Oppenheimer (2023) First Time Watching | MOVIE REACTION
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
- the Bomb who changed the course of History!
Enjoy our reaction to Oppenheimer (2023)
#couplereacts #reactionvideo #firstreaction #moviereaction
NOTE: We could not add all the great scenes including his personal life in this video edit to avoid copyright issues...you can join us on our Patreon to see the full-length reaction. Thank you!
Please don't hesitate to support us, so we can keep doing what we love 🥰You can support us by subscribing to our channel, or if you want to give us extra love and help, you can click the "SUPER THANKS" button above! 💚
and for full-length or unedited reactions, come to join our Patreon
👉 / mjoy4fun
-----------------------------------------
➡ MJoy4Fun is an interracial couple from Romania and the Philippines. We mainly post reactions and vlogs on our channel! if you enjoyed this video, leave us a comment below! 😊
-----------------------------------------
Follow us on:
Facebook: mjoy4funreacts
Winner of 7 Oscars:
Best Picture
Best Director
Best Actor
Best Supporting Actor
Best Cinematography
Best Film Editing
Best Original Score.
This has to be the best historical film I ever watched in 2023!!! Not a single CGI effect was shown! Nolan is the best director with practical effects!!!
Ehhh…. In my opinion, the Trinity test should have been CGI. He tried so hard to edit around it and used forced perspective to make it seem bigger, but it still looks like a small gasoline explosion rather than the detonation of a nuclear device.
@@primevaltimes despite that it’s still one of the absolute best historical films ever
Fun fact: Per the transcripts of his testimony, Hill was not only disgusted by the treatment of Oppenheimer but also had serious misgivings about Strauss' leadership abilities based on his time as head of the AEC, characterizing him as a micromanager who frequently ignored the advice of the very scientists he brought in to furnish him with information, and prioritized secrecy and controlling the flow of information over transparency and a well-informed scientific community and the general public. Whilst Hill recognized that Strauss may well have believed this was for the greater good, he felt it nevertheless hampered the work of his fellow scientists and did not reflect the qualities best suited to a government official. Hill also took issue with Strauss' attempts to further his credibility for the nomination by citing the approval of scientists who were no longer alive to speak for themselves, such as Hill's close friend and colleague Enrico Fermi, as well as what he saw as Strauss' failure/unwillingness to vigorously repudiate the claims of a book published in 1950 that Hill saw as a deliberate hatchet job intended to undermine and discredit Oppenheimer and throw the Los Alamos team under the bus for the Russians obtaining the A-bomb and not pushing harder on the H-bomb; as the only person quoted by the book who did not publicly disavow its conclusions, Strauss supposedly criticized it only on the basis that its publication was not at the time politically expedient, and that it should have been published long after those named in it were dead (and unable to contradict it).
Also...
The elder member of the Gray Board, Ward Evans - the one who smiles warmly at Kitty as she jousts verbally with Robb - did indeed write the minority report, the single member of the three-person panel who dissented against revoking Oppenheimer's Q clearance. As much as the proceeding was a kangaroo court, at least one member of the board was on his side.
Ward Evans' minority report was concise and sharply worded. He criticized the AEC for investigating Oppenheimer for charges on which he had previously been cleared in 1947. Oppenheimer "did not hinder the development of the H-bomb, and there is absolutely nothing in the testimony to show that he did." Evans acknowledged that Oppenheimer had left-wing and even Communist friends, but "the evidence indicates that he has fewer of them than in 1947, when he was last cleared." Moreover, "he is not as naïve as he was then. He has more judgment... it is better now than it was in 1947, and to damn him now and ruin his career and his service, I cannot do it." He concluded that failure to clear Oppenheimer would be "a black mark on the escutcheon of our country."
A German professor, retained by the Nazis, made a mistake about graphite as a moderator (easier to get than graphite). The German professors are never questioned. The supply of heavy water from Norway was interdicted by Norwegian commandos.
I’m impressed that Marion is well informed even more so than a LOT of Americans 👍
My gramps fought Japan. He was furious that I even played Nintendo. lol
That made me laugh more than it should lol, but times move on and we have to move on with it, but I can understand some people from that time having a hard time moving on.
@@dudermcdudeface3674 yep…. My grandfather’s brother died (fighter pilot) in WWII. He owned a garage and service station. Japanese cars made him livid in the late 70s and early 80s.
My Dad was a nuclear engineer and could easily understand the nuclear terminology in this movie. He could have easily helped you learn those words. Just wish this movie had come out before 2021.
The surviving author of the book it’s based on met the cast and crew. According to Murphy, American Prometheus was required reading for the movie. There is an Oppenheimer documentary on Peacock called To End all Wars, people being interviewed include the Director and the surviving author. You two might like it
Don’t forget Jason Robards in “the Day After” . 1983
I know this all happened about 80 years ago but I'm surprised that you didn't know Oppenheimer was 'the father of the nuclear bomb'. I thought everyone would know this, even now...🤯
Maybe it's more widely known here in the USA because we used the Bomb..
@@Alvan81 I'm not from the USA...
A channel called Kirsty Cotton is stealing MJoy4Fun videos. I reported them to RUclips.
Pretty sure that's the same channel that was stealing "The Homies" reaction videos as well. I reported that a couple months ago.
@@timothyhedrick5295 Yes it is and all of those stolen videos are gone so maybe RUclips jumped on them. This is the 3rd scammer I have run across on RUclips doing this. Takes weeks of reporting before RUclips will do anything.
My great-grandfather was involved with the project in Oak Ridge, TN. I don’t know if he ever talked about it to my grandmother or anyone else.
My logic professor in college was a Manhattan Project man.
I do believe Robert would have been mortified to have his private life splashed all over the movie screen.
@31:49 Germany did have a nuclear program, however, it was never remotely as well funded or organized as the American program and never came anywhere close to producing an operational nuclear bomb. The Allies never really had a good picture of how far along the Nazi program was so the race to produce nuclear weapons first was in reaction to what was perceived as a real threat of Nazi weapons being developed and used. Russia (soon to become the USSR) jumped in late and (with allegedly stolen information from the US) developed nuclear weapons shortly after the end of WWII. That Russian program was not a reaction to the German program but more one towards the US (and other Western Countries) and their (accurate) hostility towards the spread of communism, particularly in Eastern Europe.
You will love Chernobyl (2019), HBO Max mini series. its only 5 episodes but its really well done. you guys will love it.
Part of the Japanese Army tried to coup against the Emperor, to stop surrender. The coup came within 5 minutes of success.
Nice 👍🎬, guys you should do some IMDB trivia after every movie, would be nice addition...
You guys are my favorite channel to watch and it was a real joy to watch you discover this chapter of american history! Or I guess world history. Anyway thanks for another great reaction!
Wow, thank you!🥰
Watching this on IMAX was incredible !!
In my opinion that movie has the single scariest ending dialogue in movie history...the last sentences scared the living crap out of me and everyone I know...
I can not believe that you did not see this movie before when it was in the theater IMAX....
react to the film - central Brazil
One of my favorite couples ;-)
thank you!
Electrical storms do bad things to electronics.
If you two like books, I can recommend "The Making of the Atomic Bomb," by Richard Rhodes. I'm reading "American Prometheus," from which this movie was made, but I haven't finished it yet.
Great video
The former Soviet Union holds the record for the most irresponsible use of a thermonuclear bomb, when decades ago (1961), they detonated one on a small island north of the arctic circle that yielded approximately 50 megatons. See "Tsar Bomb".
No, the USA used it on living people. That is criminal.
They reduced the power by half with that bomb.
@@jbdragon3295 Yes
Absolute cinema
There was actually plenty of good reason to take Oppenheimer’s security clearance.
this is one of few recent films I'm actually interested in watching though some people have criticized it for being overlong and overwrought⚛😀❤
Guys, watch Emily Blunt again in A Quiet Place 1&2 & Fall Guy. It's totally worth it 👌.
please upload CHERNOBYL
♥
You need to reexamine the dual slit experiment. I think your interpretation is a little off.
There's another movie (made by George Clooney) called Good Night And Good Luck that's all about the anti-communist hysteria in the US in the 1950s. It also has one Robert Downey Jr. in it. Good film but much less intense than this picture.
Love that marion is always well versed in history, but yes it basically shows in the movie the Germans had the lead in phys is and there was a race to create the first bomb.
he loves history!
30:14 Nope. The main subject was how Oppenheimer was railroaded afterwards.
The film really turned out fantastic thanks to the actors and director. The only funny thing about such scenarios is the distortion of history. This film claims that the war ended thanks to the United States, which bombed Hiroshima and Nagosaki in Japan, although the bloodiest battles took place in Europe, which was liberated by the Soviet Union, putting an end to the war and storming Berlin, which is extremely inconvenient to remember in the Western world these days. . However, for the ending, I am ready to applaud Nolan every time after the credits. The message of the film is very strong and... unfortunately relevant right now.
well, I'm first
Your 7th 😅
Im honest this movie is not for me but i love your reactions and your discussion about the topic Stay safe love from Portugal ❤
thank you! appreciate it. 🥰
🥱😴🥱😴🥱😴🥱😴
Clint Eastwood made two ww2 movies "Flags of Our Father's" and "Letters From Iwo Jima" if y'all haven't seen those, they're quite entertaining
Salaar please
I didn't care too much for this film. If you just like to watch people talking for 2hrs, well OK. I prefer the movie Fat Man and Little Boy which tells a much better story of developing the Atomic Bomb.
That was a good one, too.
I found this movie boring and depressing.
Yeah, Oppenheimer was not a happy-go-lucky guy. And this fed into his own self-critical disillusion after the bomb drop (honestly, probably before).
lol 😅
No no.. Communist Russia does the torturing.. not so much the Americans. They do but they wouldn't ever do it to Oppenheimer.. 😂
I'm rewatching this. I'm glad you explained at the end. I'm not a history buff and I could never understand the reasoning for using the bombs on Japan. I still don't agree with it but I can see that if they really thought they'd never surrender thinking that was the answer. I hated Oppenheimer this whole movie and was rooting for Strauss because I do think they ruined the world with the bomb. Who knew it could actually get more ruined tho? 🦠😷
So you were rooting for someone that wanted to make even bigger bombs ?
@@Maxime_G ok. I guess I should have said I was rooting for him to lose his security clearance. Point was he was an arrogant pr*ck to the point of risking ending the world just to prove his theory. I know the movie wanted us to somehow sympathize with him but it was still well made even if glorified him.
@@antoinettelopes well... It wasn't glorifying him. If it was, then the whole security clearance thing wouldn't be there.
It was more complicated than that, it wasn't glorifying nor denuncing a man, it was just... telling his story, his view, his psychology both subjectively and objectively... And shows that he at a moment of his life he had been against merciless political bastards like Strauss...
We Can debate on if the fact that his security clearance was necessary or not, we weren't there to have a perfect conclusion and answer, and nobody was to have it. However, we can't root for the people responsible for it because of how and why they really did it. And it wasn't because of real "national security risk" but completely out of personal vendictivness... Which is different.
And saying what you're saying about the destruction of the world and his theory... Well, he's not entirely in charge of that, he didn't have any choice, and it was not the only Time in science history where you can't completely erase a terrible possibility
Japan in the 1940s never would’ve surrendered. They were as ruthless as the Viet Cong of the 1960s and North Korea of today. NK doesn’t consider us human therefore torture and death carries as much meaning as working in farm animal meat processing