@@CatchBurning Please stop spreading that lie, the academic world knew the earth is a globe since 600 B.C. Maps and Navigation were built around that, Warfare did include astronomics, and so on. What the christians didn't accept for a while was that Earth is not the Center of our Solar System.
"Given that diamonds are harder than i am when Muffet pours me a cup of spiders" Lol wat Also when people mine They're not striking the diamond They're breaking the rock around it Because would you want to carry a big damn rock around because it has diamonds in it? Not that steve would give a shit Considering his inventory is fucking magic and he can carry more gold than there is in the entire fucking solar system without breaking a sweat
As a coder, I'll tell you a secret: the Minecraft world is a rectangular box, divided into several increasingly smaller rectangular boxes. Once you get close enough to the end of that box, another is created/loaded to give the illusion of a continuous world. Once you get far enough from the first one, it disappears. This is because computer games can't actually simulate reality, only a very crude approximation of it. And in the case of Minecraft, where the world is a box that consists of groups of 1x1x1m boxes, it's about as crude as it can get.
Why not just go all the way and find out which video game characters are capable of holding the largest amount of mass. Not just item density, but total mass.
Luke, with the inventory, at max with gold which has a 19.2 Ton per Cubic meter and 1Meter=1Cube, You have 9*4 place in your inventory with a 64 object per stack which gives you:9*4*64*19.2Tons=44 236.8 metirc tons or 44 236 800Kg or *2.2 =97 320 960 Pounds or the mass of a fully loaded Aircraft Carrier in your pocket, knowing a pocket has ~ The volume of a Wallet which is 9cm *5 cm*3 cm and there is for pocket so 540cubic centimer so 0.00054 cubic meter, it gives a density of: 180 224 000 000Kg/m^3 or 180 224 000Tons/m^3 or 1.80224*10^11Kg/m^3 or 1.80224*10^8Tons/m^3. The density of a neutron stars is :10^17Kg/m^3 so the millionth of the density of a neutron stars. Have a good day.
Dog & sans Bold In Starmade (It's like Minecraft in space) the planets are actually shaped like 12 sided dice to roughly simulate roundness in a block-based universe. Considering the obstacles that was actually probably one of the better solutions I think.
Not really, he assumes you would move the earth with rockets, but by the time you could make an artificial earth, you would have much more effective, efficient, technology. That, and the fact he assumes the THEORY of gravity is indeed fact, when it is just a theory.
Jaydengt5 Theory is an measure of observation and explaining certain types of phenomena in the natural world and is repeatable in accordance to the scientific method. the reasons we call it theory in a scientific sense is we can't prove what causes gravity.
Since steve doesnt age nor grows could we say he build a world for himself? He seams to be a godlike existence since he also just restarts after his former body died, so could he just...?
Aaron Long I’m not saying that making up fictions is wrong! I never did. It’s just weird how someone would try to explain fiction with real life sciences or vise versa. Making fiction is fine! Explaining it with physics (with are totally crap) is just dumb! Your trying to explain MAGIC with SCIENCE it just doesn’t work!
Dear Austin: I am curious about the physics of Recoil Boosting, the act of using the recoil of weaponry to propel someone in the air. From games like Shantae, Devil May Cry, Jetpack Joyride, No Time to Explain, and GTA, they always show Recoil Boosting as easy and baking Hot Pockets. (Clearly, this is bullshit) Could you do a video on this subject? How many of the Engineer's infinite pistols would be needed to make a person fly? How many chainguns would be needed to fuel a commercial airliner? If the Tsar Bomba and other WMDs were repurposed into rockets, how far would they fly? Big Fan, Neo
Randall Munroe did a take on it on xkcd What If. I'll just quote him here: "The GAU-8 Avenger fires up to sixty one-pound bullets a second. It produces almost five tons of recoil force, which is crazy considering that it’s mounted in a type of plane (the A-10 "Warthog") whose two engines produce only four tons of thrust each. If you put two of them in one aircraft, and fired both guns forward while opening up the throttle, the guns would win and you’d accelerate backward. To put it another way: If I mounted a GAU-8 on my car, put the car in neutral, and started firing backward from a standstill, I would be breaking the interstate speed limit in less than three seconds. As good as this gun would be as a rocket pack engine, the Russians built one that would work even better. The Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-6-30 weighs half as much as the GAU-8 and has an even higher fire rate. Its thrust-to-weight ratio approaches 40, which means if you pointed one at the ground and fired, not only would it take off in a rapidly expanding spray of deadly metal fragments, but you would experience 40 gees of acceleration. [...] But if you somehow braced the human rider, made the craft strong enough to survive the acceleration, wrapped it in an aerodynamic shell, and made sure it was adequately cooled with a GSH-6-30, you could jump mountains."
10:28 cool proposition, ultimately incorrect. The idea of relativity is NOT that it becomes harder to accelerate as you approach the speed of light. As an observer, the planet would be slowing its acceleration, but to the player, the planet would be continuing to accelerate at a normal 9.12 m/s^2. This is because the time for observers is remaining at a constant rate, while time is slowing down for the people on the planet, meaning the planet is technically slowing down, but for the player it has no effect. This means eventually it will feel like you are moving faster than what is physically possible (reaching planets thought to be multiple light years away in mere seconds), but the planets will now seem to be very close to the planet that you are on, so the speed would appear normal to your player. So what would actually happen is the stars above the player in the minecraft world would look closer to the player as time went on.
ok seriously are we not going to talk about the matpat thing?! like the litterally made a video about the same thing in the same day, contradicting each other.
matpat tried to prove that a SQUARE planet would not work ShoddyCast showed to the fullest that a FLAT planet would work until you reach the speed of light it's two different thing on one videogame just go to youtube and write minecraft everyone copies shit this is a different topic and a better one if i can put my opinion even if gametheorist will probably find where i live and skin me alive for not liking matpat :p
It was a more up beat anime until that moment until it said this ain't what you signed up for but your here for the ride bitch because shits gonna get dark the cake is a lie and so is this
I've had this thought for a while, since gravity clearly has an effect on light, it makes me wonder if the gravity of a flat earth would be enough to bend light bouncing off distant points at a shallow angle to actually come back down to the surface over a long enough distance in effect making the flat earth surface actually look like a giant shallow bowl. I would imagine that if there was a large enough flat earth it might be a prominent enough effect to make it appear as if we were on the inside of a sphere with the horizon being a small circle up in the sky that looks like a hole in said sphere, lol.
the acceleration will only decrease from outside perspective. Because the speed will stretch time too, so the G forces will not change due to relativity. (Your argument would imply that your speed compared to an external frame of reference is detectable without comparing to the external frame, which is not. Because the G forces on your "spaceship" are internal to the "spaceship".) But that does not change your point at all. Chemical fuel is so ineffective anyway. It is somewhat better if you use a black-hole drive, or other more exotic propulsion device, but even that would not change things that much, because you are using propellant.
don't they say earth is on the back of giraffes on the back of elephants on the back of a turtle? magic, magic explains it. we just haven't caught up the technological level of galactic turtles. i believe the earth is a 2 dimensional triangle, because mountains.... yeah
Well considering that gravity pulls with a force both based on distance and mass of the objects, the closer you got to the black hole, the faster you would accelerate. Also you run into the problem of passing through the Event Horizon after a while, which wouldn't be good.
This would only work to approximate normal gravity for a pretty short period of time. And only if the bottom of minecraft is pointed at the black hole. In truth you and minecraft would accelerate in to the black hole at nearly the same rate at first. This would create the illusion from your perspective that there wasn't any gravity worth speaking of at all. Pushing off of minecraft would send you hurling through the air. You'd never escape the black hole by jumping of course. But from your frame of reference the change of acceleration looks like micro gravity. The reality is you're just falling in a little bit slower than minecraft now. As you got closer to the black hole all kinds of really horrible things start to happen. Eventually the bottom of minecraft is being pulled much harder than the surface. Each layer of minecraft is stripped away from the others. Then the blocks themselves are ripped apart by the same tidal forces. Minecraft Steeve is long since dead by this point. He might be spared having his body torn in to micro sectons if the Black hole is feeding at the time. Then the astounding radioactivity of the accretion disk would fry him to death before he ever got that close.
infinite lava and water possible through quantum theory. particles appear and disapear in other parts of the universe. this happens leading to the phenomenon that is infinite water or larva. i think i did this correctly but it is 1:44 am and my brain is sort of fuccked from needing sleep and a video on infinite numbers which the brain can't fully comprehend.
1:14 I love the way he speaks his profanity. It's just the way he says it: how self-assured and angry he sounds, the context of disproving something, and how he says it in a harmonious way that flows well.
A Troll Named Rod not a circle. You'd still be accelerating an an increasing rate, even when you don't seem to travel at all. The Speed of Light isn't a distance, it's a velocity. Eliminating the distance factor doesn't change the acceleration and velocity vector. I believe you are using the logic of inertia, which is an object's ability to resist a change in motion. However, even that is flawed, as an object closer to the center or rotation will not be moving as quickly as a person at the edge, the effect only getting more intense the closer the center or rotation. If this were the case, we would notice a very significant gravity difference from one pole to the next. Rotating the disk only adds more inertial force to the edges of the disk. Based on the logo of the flat earth society, people in the northern hemisphere would see the least difference in inertia, but the Southern Hemisphere would see the highest. Considering the gravity of earth is fairly consistent throughout the planet (again, relative), the rotation vector can't be it either. Basically, having a flat earth go around in a circle would create a very noticeable difference in g-forces towards the center of rotation. Not the center of the disk, the center or rotation. And that has little to do with gravity. That's physics for amateurs!
I'm pretty sure that it would be because if you were standing on it and it stopped accelerating, both you and the flat world would be drifting through space at the same speed. If you pushed off of it to try to walk or something, you would then be moving faster than your world, pretty much making you float away.
you would need acceleration to make that artificial gravity, as Jordan said if you just pushed off of the flat earth, you would be making your velocity greater than earths, basically meaning that there is no artificial gravity.
Dylan Maloney can I mention terminal velocity. In terms of gravity the acceleration stops at a certain point, which is terminal velocity. So, How would you reach the speed of light if capped by terminal velocity?
Dylan Maloney yea. I guess so. Another tangent. Wouldn't the floating mass end up impacting space bodies eventually, like an asteroid or another earth?
5:59 even if it's spread out... you would calculate the gravitational attraction using F = Gm1m2/r^2 using you and the minecraft world as m1m2, and the distance between you and the centre of mass of the minecraft world as r, so the gravity is not negligible, and would get weaker as you got further away from the centre of mas as gravity gets weaker, and the gravity would be in the direction of the centre of mass, so it would be pulling you more and more sideways as you got closer to the edge
Actually relativity would only have the effect of reducing the acceleration from the perspective of a stationary observer, it would not do that for anyone on the accelerating world because relativity states that all reference frames are equivalent including ones that accelerate and/or spin.
I suddenly realized that something must be seriously wrong when the video said, "Your character will start floating off into space as you approach the speed of light." The obvious question is: the speed of light relative to what? There's no absolute way to measure anything's speed; speed can only be measured between two objects. So it's Minecraft world and what? And why should our choice of reference object affect the energy needs of Minecraft world's rockets?
True. There would be no *observable* effect due to relativity; the only observable effect of your increased speed would be that, as you speed up *relative to the stars*, their light would blueshift, into ultraviolet, X-rays, and eventually gamma rays. So apart from all life being gradually killed and then vaporised, it's all good!
this is great show, but what about first law of gravity? if something moves and its not disturbed by any force, it keeps on moving and no power is needed to continue this motion (sorry, bad english)
Jakub Herbuś The problem with that is that the earth would need much more fuel to keep accelerating. When the fuel runs out, it would move at the same speed forever, so no G-Forces would be felt. The velocity would stay the same, but acceleration is needed to feel G-Forces.
No, it doesn't. It does have a rendering border (which is basically a limitation set by your computer's strength and graphics settings you set ingame).
Because Minecraft actually, literally, occurs in a plane, if you could possibly render all the chunks at once, you could see till your resolution would no longer be high enough to determine any features. No horizon.
No, we like Austin and MatPat. They do different things normally. Austin does a lot of analysis on how it would actually work and what would happen because of it, MatPat does things with a new idea and evidence within the lore of games to support his hypothesis/theory.
KosherKitten I think he used the player character's falling speed to calculate gravity and then the gravity to calculate its size. Though how he got the surface area I don't know.
Maybe hes using console minecrafts? On PC it does go on infinitely until the file gets so large your computer cant handle it. I think even the issue of the badlands has been fixed which use to be considered the edge of the world. But that only because the algorithm started messing up pretty bad at that point.
The software can only generate a finite amount of chunks, which is why there's a barrier at at "edge" of the world, which is X/Z +/- 30,000,000. Go outside the barrier and it tries to keep going, but weird things start to happen. For all intensive purposes, that's the size of the world.
Even though I never played Minecraft, the world in the game is round, you can see at 4:12 that the stars come up on the horizon as the camera moves forward.
ikr come to the netherlands were you can smell the sea if you are just about to die from the sea(save the enviroment because the tempature is going to raise and the sea too we are all going to die) 😱😱😱😱
Super dense ? But you can mine obsidian , which is super strong , so how could you not mine bed rock? How strong would bedrock have to be for you to not be able to even scratch it with a diamond pick axe.
Totole But then the bottom of the world is super dense, whist the top is not, meaning that it'll probably collapse in on itself, creating a ball. Secondly, He doesn't even go into the fact that there is a 10 minute each day/night cycle, which would mean that the 'flat' planet would have to be spiralling, not traveling in a straight line, requiring RIDICULOUS Delta-V to sustain.
Wait, if your in space and you are at relatively the same speed and it just stops, wouldn't keep going since there are no other natural sources in space?
I have this theory that Minecraft is a future where nuclear bombs mutated and killed everyone (hence villagers are weird and monsters). And you are the last human(s) alive
Actually they focused on different aspects of the Minecraft world theory. Shoddycast focused on could Minecraft's world be flat and Game Theory focused on could the Minecraft's world be cubed.
Erattic8 in space there's hydrogen atoms creating friction, slowing it down. Even if you were to ignore that, it would keep on moving just not accelerating, meaning that gravity would work differently. It would move at a constant speed that wouldn't change, so you'd fall at a constant speed without accelerating, which is not how gravity works in minecraft or in real life (it is required for it to work in real life as well, because this whole theory's basis is the equivalence principle)
Using your logic, things would come to a stop when traveling in space, which would eliminate asteroids and comets, and the big bang theory wouldn't have actually worked, as things immediately started slowing down with friction to a standstill in space.
unidentified guy Things do slow down from friction, it's just that the forces that slow them are so insignificant that it won't cause a noticeable difference in speed over time
9:05 once it's moved that much in a vacuum (say in between galaxies) you would keep the same speed due to no forces changing your speed BECAUSE SCIENCE
I think the worst part of these shows is the fact I now enter every social interaction by saying "Hi! It's Me, Woody!" Thanks Austin. Way to make such an awesome show I'm now subconsciously mimicking you.
Thanks this helps alot! im doing a hw assessment disproving flat earth and by explain how eventually would have a mass and density of 2 juipters making the flat earth theory impossible can really help!!
I believe that your last part, about less and less acceleration being felt over time is only relative to an outside observer. To someone on the planet, the acceleration would keep going just fine.
When Austin said the Earth was flat, my mind was like," Is Austin taking drugs? Is he suffering from psychological disorders? IS HE GOING MAD?". Then he denies it 5 seconds later and all worries go away.
There's also the issues of A) the moon's steady orbit, B) the sun's constant presence, and C) the stars not disappearing behind every horizon constantly.
There is only an invisible barrier that stops you from continuing. There are blocks after it, so you are limited to a part if the planet, not the entirety of it.
Thanks for the help with my physics homework. I knew I could come here for the difference between acceleration and velocity (also I can tell my parents I'm doing homework instead of watching videos)
Well I guess this makes sense. In some part of the universe there is a flat disc that is carried on the backs of 4 giant elephants which then in turn stand on a colossal sea turtle named A'Tuin.
"If you walk to the edge of minecraft it doesnt just wrap around!" Well yes but actually no. You see it WOULD if there was no world border (or just before like 1.5 release) the only thing stopping that from happening is mojangs hardcoded limit once you hit 2^32 blocks would start to repeat however because entity coordinates are doubles youd eventually just hit x=Infinity
I think you could get round the perpetual increase in speed by sending the hypothetical flat minecraft world in a huge loop. If the parameters were picked right surely you could achieve the necessary acceleration from the change in direction rather than an increase in speed?
Have you considered its actually rotating a super massive black hole? The void is a good contender for that and if you get it moving around it will stay in the proper higjt
Good video, but a few points: I would like to note that as the ship reaches relativistic speeds, it wouldn't actually "feel" like it's accelerating less, it would only appear from a stationary observer to be accelerating less. Because of the time dilation, you would still feel ~1g of acceleration the whole time. This is because you must always be consistent in your own reference frame. Sure, the sky might get blue shifted and meteorites would blow holes in the crust, but on the planet itself the world must remain consistent with itself. There's also a point about the rocket. As anyone who plays KSP well knows, Nuclear rocket engines (and to a lesser extent, other chemical rockets) can be far more efficient than the F-1 rocket engines of the Saturn V. While in the long run we still need planet-sized reaction mass, using a barrage of nuclear bombs (Orion Nuclear Pulse style) for propulsion or an open cycle gas core Nuclear Thermal Rocket would make the rocketworld considerably smaller in propellant mass. Perhaps it is more realistic to propose that Minecraft is on an absolutely huge, slow rotating centrifuge?
I've never heard Austin curse uncensored and, it's beautiful.
Same
FUCKING SAME
10,000 Ideas Austin cussing is awesome!!!
I agree, it just makes the science even better.
I wish RUclips wasn't punishing adult language, I miss Austin swearing.
Austin then: “The Minecraft world is flat!”
Austin now: *“THE MINECRAFT WORLD IS ROUNDD!!”*
Austin must have entered the realm of politics.
Rationalityislost101 he might have but if you watch it you will understand
He says the flat earth makes NO SENST
Well, it took our Christian ancestors a lot longer to change their minds about the earth’s shape. He did a pretty good job. 😂
@@CatchBurning Please stop spreading that lie, the academic world knew the earth is a globe since 600 B.C. Maps and Navigation were built around that, Warfare did include astronomics, and so on. What the christians didn't accept for a while was that Earth is not the Center of our Solar System.
3:46 - Bach, Brandenburg Concerto no. 3 in G major, BWV 1048.
8:34 - Beethoven, Symphony no. 5 in C minor, op. 67, movement 1.
You are a true hero
Wow, this video comes right before a game theory episode on same subject.
Conga Mann ikr
Conga Mann indeed
coincidence? i fink not
ILUMINATI
Confirmed
I love how 2 hours after this comes out, MatPat uploads his theory on how the minecraft world isn't flat. Talk about coincidence.
Stephen Strange ikr
I know right
Like how MatPat and Vsauce 3 both did watch dogs.
Did something happen and cause this theory to come up?
Austin: hey Matt wanna do a video on the same day on the same game but opposite eachothers arguments
Matt: hell fuckin yeah man
"Given that diamonds are harder than i am when Muffet pours me a cup of spiders"
Lol wat
Also when people mine
They're not striking the diamond
They're breaking the rock around it
Because would you want to carry a big damn rock around because it has diamonds in it?
Not that steve would give a shit
Considering his inventory is fucking magic and he can carry more gold than there is in the entire fucking solar system without breaking a sweat
I died when he said "out the ass end of the rocket nozzle"
Also your "Example rocket"
for Minecraft is just an upside down jar with a handle...
I've never heard him swear...
Spartan War118 thanks for a different episode reference
the flat earth movement has people all around the world
I see what you did there....
Spacefrisian i did what you see there
pc master race 👍👍
*The globe
+pc master race XD
Hearing Austin curse is a whole new experience and I want to life like this forever.
As a coder, I'll tell you a secret: the Minecraft world is a rectangular box, divided into several increasingly smaller rectangular boxes. Once you get close enough to the end of that box, another is created/loaded to give the illusion of a continuous world. Once you get far enough from the first one, it disappears.
This is because computer games can't actually simulate reality, only a very crude approximation of it. And in the case of Minecraft, where the world is a box that consists of groups of 1x1x1m boxes, it's about as crude as it can get.
fuck everyone knows this
not really a secret though because a lot of people already knew this
Well I mean it makes sense and he said he was a hacker soooo sorry Austin!
@@imjustaweirdhuman2722 he said he was a coder, not a hacker.
I͎m͎ j͎u͎s͎t͎ a͎ W͎e͎i͎r͎d͎ h͎u͎m͎a͎n͎ two very different things
Austin, you should do a episode about minecraft inventory density.
I heavily second this.
Perhaps he could do a broader topic on loads of games with crazy inventories, like pulling missile launchers out of your arse in GTA.
Why not just go all the way and find out which video game characters are capable of holding the largest amount of mass. Not just item density, but total mass.
Luke, with the inventory, at max with gold which has a 19.2 Ton per Cubic meter and 1Meter=1Cube, You have 9*4 place in your inventory with a 64 object per stack which gives you:9*4*64*19.2Tons=44 236.8 metirc tons or 44 236 800Kg or *2.2 =97 320 960 Pounds or the mass of a fully loaded Aircraft Carrier in your pocket, knowing a pocket has ~ The volume of a Wallet which is 9cm *5 cm*3 cm and there is for pocket so 540cubic centimer so 0.00054 cubic meter, it gives a density of: 180 224 000 000Kg/m^3 or 180 224 000Tons/m^3 or 1.80224*10^11Kg/m^3 or 1.80224*10^8Tons/m^3. The density of a neutron stars is :10^17Kg/m^3 so the millionth of the density of a neutron stars. Have a good day.
Essentially, you can hold the equivalent weight of the Eiffel Tower in 1 cubic meter gold blocks in your pocket.
The add before this was for a group trying to tell everyone about the secret space program and hollow earth
That sounds hilarious. I want what's in your view history.
Oh my gosh me too! I'm really glad I'm not the only crazy one here. Too much Game Grumps I think.
I never watch anything remotely related to that lol. RUclips must've just seen 'flat earth' and gone "ah, say no more.! I know your type"
Hey Hobie! I didn't know you watched ShoddyCast. How does it feel to be recognised by fans?
i got it too!!
"I suggest Minecraft, it seems to be doing alright for now" 2020: Top-selling game ever
I like how mat pat posted a similar video an hour later
Lord Blasman yeah matpats video was literally right above this one
Pretty real, hypothetical, smart-ass.
Skinny121 579 never said that... im not an idiot
+Trens Gemini Wait what brobeans? That makes no sense, and what's up with those commas?
I saw that
Earth isn't a ball or flat it's a dodecahedron
lol, no it's not x'D
Mikes8899 it's a joke
Oh you must be from Starmade, love that game.
Dog & sans Bold
In Starmade (It's like Minecraft in space) the planets are actually shaped like 12 sided dice to roughly simulate roundness in a block-based universe. Considering the obstacles that was actually probably one of the better solutions I think.
*takes off glasses* my god, he's right!
Little did we know this would be the start of something epic
Can those 22 trillion rockets cook my hot dog?
Nah.
It won't even be able to find the hotdog.
Kyle Peng
Nope.
Depends how big the hot dog is
No- cause I’ll have already stolen and used your hotdog as more fuel for my rockets
You should do the science behind the Fus Ro Dah. I'm courious to how powerful it really is and stuff like that
vsauce 3 did that. basically, the whole universe gets destroyed.
You and Matpat need to have a hardcore deathwatch of science,math and funny animations.
Forever Unknown deathmatch?
Yeah
team deathmatch?
Forever Unknown Epic Rap Battles of Theories!
You just rekt a lot of flat-earthers.
Toxic Potato yeah
yeah narcissism is a sad thing, you should look into a mirror.
Disproving a flat earth in a round earth system doesn't prove anything
Not really, he assumes you would move the earth with rockets, but by the time you could make an artificial earth, you would have much more effective, efficient, technology. That, and the fact he assumes the THEORY of gravity is indeed fact, when it is just a theory.
Jaydengt5 Theory is an measure of observation and explaining certain types of phenomena in the natural world and is repeatable in accordance to the scientific method. the reasons we call it theory in a scientific sense is we can't prove what causes gravity.
I'm a tiny bit proud of myself. As soon as I heard "Accelarating at a constant rate" I was thinking "shit's gonna get relativistic at some point."
Since steve doesnt age nor grows could we say he build a world for himself?
He seams to be a godlike existence since he also just restarts after his former body died, so could he just...?
Hes god!!
CRAP LOGIC!!!!!! FICTION = LOGIC WHY!!!
Aaron Long I’m not saying that making up fictions is wrong! I never did. It’s just weird how someone would try to explain fiction with real life sciences or vise versa. Making fiction is fine! Explaining it with physics (with are totally crap) is just dumb! Your trying to explain MAGIC with SCIENCE it just doesn’t work!
My brain is going to hurt by the time this is over isn't it?
well, yeah. math is included.
wouldn't be a shoddycast Austin rant if it it didn't lol
Don't think about the numbers, it will hurt less.
too late ugh my head it hurts it's math magic again make it stop pleasse
sory To say but my head doesnt Hurt at all
You should do a science video for the 3D maneuver gear
yes
Aurora Bennett it would never work but I would be cool
Aurora Bennett nah it uses fake physics. Cool but there's a reason why the explanation of how it works is 'classified'
Hookshot physics. You would be torn apart.
I know but I still wanna know about it
Me and the boys up at 2 AM approaching the Speed of Light.
If the earth isn't flat, then why are pancakes flat?
Flat earth truthers: 1
Ball earth Wrongers: 0
You know too much
Launch pancake batter into space put it in to an orbit (free fall) cook on medium heat for a few miniutes it'll form a pancake sphere.
now I want a round ball of fried cake with maple syrup oceans.
But how can we know Kevin bacon isn't real if our history isn't real?
How can mirrors be real if our eyes aren't real?
Dear Austin:
I am curious about the physics of Recoil Boosting, the act of using the recoil of weaponry to propel someone in the air. From games like Shantae, Devil May Cry, Jetpack Joyride, No Time to Explain, and GTA, they always show Recoil Boosting as easy and baking Hot Pockets.
(Clearly, this is bullshit)
Could you do a video on this subject? How many of the Engineer's infinite pistols would be needed to make a person fly? How many chainguns would be needed to fuel a commercial airliner? If the Tsar Bomba and other WMDs were repurposed into rockets, how far would they fly?
Big Fan,
Neo
Neo Machine what-if.xkcd.com/21/
Also, grenade jumping in Halo 2 is kind of related.
Randall Munroe did a take on it on xkcd What If. I'll just quote him here:
"The GAU-8 Avenger fires up
to sixty one-pound bullets a second. It produces almost five tons of
recoil force, which is crazy considering that it’s mounted in a type of
plane (the A-10 "Warthog") whose two
engines produce only four tons of thrust each. If you put two of them in
one aircraft, and fired both guns forward while opening up the throttle,
the guns would win and you’d accelerate backward.
To put it another way: If I mounted a GAU-8 on my car, put the car in
neutral, and started firing backward from a standstill, I would be
breaking the interstate speed limit in less than three seconds.
As good as this gun would be as a rocket pack engine, the Russians built
one that would work even better. The Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-6-30 weighs
half as much as the GAU-8 and has an even higher fire rate. Its
thrust-to-weight ratio approaches 40, which means if you pointed one at
the ground and fired, not only would it take off in a rapidly expanding
spray of deadly metal fragments, but you would experience 40 gees of
acceleration.
[...]
But if you somehow braced the human rider, made the craft strong enough
to survive the acceleration, wrapped it in an aerodynamic shell, and
made sure it was adequately cooled with a GSH-6-30, you could jump mountains."
so like ruby and yang using there weapons to propel themselves?
what-if.xkcd.com/21/ here's the link buddies, maybe send that for the kickass pictures
If the minecraft map is so large, how friggin fast does the player character have to be to run across the map!?
Renegade Gray you could traverse the Minecraft planet at any speed. It would just take longer.
Unless he was flying that would be impossible to calculate and would change since jumping time is slightly slower then runnning
Hwiagumbum vv
Lauri Elsilä yeah he did a bunch of charity streams of it as well
/tp ~29999999 ~0 ~29999999
Don't worry if you don't understand, it's literally rocket science.
I've learned rocket science, it's actually not that hard. Well, that really depends on what field you're talking about.
@@GamerBoss1013 what
@@GamerBoss1013 ahhhhhhh got it
Could you talk about the feasability of some r6 siege gadgets, like pulses cardiac sensor, or IQ's Red MkIII Spectre? like so he sees it
Please. Maybe Thermites breach charges or Sledge and his sledge hammer.
yes! that would be awesome!
Andrew_FTW they're all feasible... Thermite even fucking explains what it is in a short version. Jfc
NaudizCubed well then please explain Echo's drone, Pulse's sensor, and Hibana's charges.
OH! THAT'S A GOOD FUCKIN' IDEA!
10:28 cool proposition, ultimately incorrect. The idea of relativity is NOT that it becomes harder to accelerate as you approach the speed of light. As an observer, the planet would be slowing its acceleration, but to the player, the planet would be continuing to accelerate at a normal 9.12 m/s^2. This is because the time for observers is remaining at a constant rate, while time is slowing down for the people on the planet, meaning the planet is technically slowing down, but for the player it has no effect. This means eventually it will feel like you are moving faster than what is physically possible (reaching planets thought to be multiple light years away in mere seconds), but the planets will now seem to be very close to the planet that you are on, so the speed would appear normal to your player. So what would actually happen is the stars above the player in the minecraft world would look closer to the player as time went on.
I think the question should be: Does Minecraft prove Earth could be a CUBE?
The World Can't be Flat! it's not even Level! FUCKING MOUNTAINS!
The earth is flat you idiot...
Nghtstorm161 :0
Nghtstorm161 so what about the pics from space?
Great another one of those Mountain believers, can't leave Night Vale without running into one of you. ;)
ifkr
I refuse to believe Austin and Matpat uploading videos about the SAME topic on the SAME day was a coincidence
9:09 Toriel, he's making a theory! XD
ok seriously are we not going to talk about the matpat thing?! like the litterally made a video about the same thing in the same day, contradicting each other.
So...what you're saying is that you didn't watch the video, you just wrote a comment because of presumptions based on the title and thumbnail?
Game theory anounced this video a week ago.
Probably planned together to give interesting counter-arguments.
Twenty-Something Nerd yeah essentially, I wrote the comment like half way through the video, my bad. But at least the same thematic is there.
matpat tried to prove that a SQUARE planet would not work ShoddyCast showed to the fullest that a FLAT planet would work until you reach the speed of light it's two different thing on one videogame just go to youtube and write minecraft everyone copies shit this is a different topic and a better one if i can put my opinion even if gametheorist will probably find where i live and skin me alive for not liking matpat :p
Wait… there’s a JUST AUSTIN CHANNEL!? YES!!!
Ah i really needed the Vietnam flash back of the musket girl getting her head bit off
It was a more up beat anime until that moment until it said this ain't what you signed up for but your here for the ride bitch because shits gonna get dark the cake is a lie and so is this
I've had this thought for a while, since gravity clearly has an effect on light, it makes me wonder if the gravity of a flat earth would be enough to bend light bouncing off distant points at a shallow angle to actually come back down to the surface over a long enough distance in effect making the flat earth surface actually look like a giant shallow bowl. I would imagine that if there was a large enough flat earth it might be a prominent enough effect to make it appear as if we were on the inside of a sphere with the horizon being a small circle up in the sky that looks like a hole in said sphere, lol.
Rick and Morty fan confirmed.
IQ:9999
Ian S you should do a theory video on that! I’m interested.
"What I do in the comfort and anonymity of my own home is up to me" he says as Rosario x Vampire scrolls by
I'm so glad that this wasn't just the same as game theory's video
even if it was, austin uploaded it first.
Game theory anounced this video a week ago.
Who cares?
the acceleration will only decrease from outside perspective. Because the speed will stretch time too, so the G forces will not change due to relativity. (Your argument would imply that your speed compared to an external frame of reference is detectable without comparing to the external frame, which is not. Because the G forces on your "spaceship" are internal to the "spaceship".)
But that does not change your point at all. Chemical fuel is so ineffective anyway. It is somewhat better if you use a black-hole drive, or other more exotic propulsion device, but even that would not change things that much, because you are using propellant.
9:17 when he said Delta Vee a few people had either a good chuckle or an epiphany
Wow... you and GT just did the same video. Well same topic.
But you both went in the complete opposite directions XD
RainMasterXD hmmmm...
Alex Barbu Because a flat world wouldn't make sense either in the end. Like Austin said it would end up being a sphere in the end anyway.
don't they say earth is on the back of giraffes on the back of elephants on the back of a turtle? magic, magic explains it. we just haven't caught up the technological level of galactic turtles. i believe the earth is a 2 dimensional triangle, because mountains.... yeah
isn't a 2D triangle just a triangular flat world?
no no no its turtles all the way down.
We live on earth not discworld.
Also just imagine the force of those giraffe farts.
If Earth is a 2D triangle than the moon is just a grey Dorito.
there is something oh so nice about hearing that classical opening. These videos are just too good Austin.
EVERYONE TWEET THIS AT FLAT EARTH PEOPLE!
What if the minecraft planet just accelarates towards a giant black hole at 9.1 m/s^2
Well considering that gravity pulls with a force both based on distance and mass of the objects, the closer you got to the black hole, the faster you would accelerate.
Also you run into the problem of passing through the Event Horizon after a while, which wouldn't be good.
This would only work to approximate normal gravity for a pretty short period of time. And only if the bottom of minecraft is pointed at the black hole. In truth you and minecraft would accelerate in to the black hole at nearly the same rate at first. This would create the illusion from your perspective that there wasn't any gravity worth speaking of at all. Pushing off of minecraft would send you hurling through the air. You'd never escape the black hole by jumping of course. But from your frame of reference the change of acceleration looks like micro gravity. The reality is you're just falling in a little bit slower than minecraft now.
As you got closer to the black hole all kinds of really horrible things start to happen. Eventually the bottom of minecraft is being pulled much harder than the surface. Each layer of minecraft is stripped away from the others. Then the blocks themselves are ripped apart by the same tidal forces. Minecraft Steeve is long since dead by this point. He might be spared having his body torn in to micro sectons if the Black hole is feeding at the time. Then the astounding radioactivity of the accretion disk would fry him to death before he ever got that close.
Haha love it, this would make a great game ending.
Also the black hole would accelerate both the minecraft planet And its inhabitants, so your character would still be experiencing weightlessness.
I spent 2 days trying to find these episodes on game theory. I fought Austin and his SCIENCE episodes how no clipped into the backrooms
8:11 Twice what we started with is 1.2e20kg more than what we ended up with.
That's almost fifty percent.
infinite lava and water possible through quantum theory. particles appear and disapear in other parts of the universe. this happens leading to the phenomenon that is infinite water or larva. i think i did this correctly but it is 1:44 am and my brain is sort of fuccked from needing sleep and a video on infinite numbers which the brain can't fully comprehend.
minecraft doesnt have infinite lava tho
+Fluorescentgreen5
It does, but it's less simple than infinte water.
You'd need to make a 3x3 lava field and always take out of the middle.
Gybbson Lesly that would create an equal amout of anti mater so you would have to destroy matter eventually
Gybbson Lesly 😂 in theory it is possible- but there would have to be very specific conditions.
1:14 I love the way he speaks his profanity. It's just the way he says it: how self-assured and angry he sounds, the context of disproving something, and how he says it in a harmonious way that flows well.
Acceleration is a vector, so changing your direction counts as acceleration. You can just go in a circle, you don't actually have to keep speeding up.
A Troll Named Rod not a circle. You'd still be accelerating an an increasing rate, even when you don't seem to travel at all. The Speed of Light isn't a distance, it's a velocity. Eliminating the distance factor doesn't change the acceleration and velocity vector.
I believe you are using the logic of inertia, which is an object's ability to resist a change in motion. However, even that is flawed, as an object closer to the center or rotation will not be moving as quickly as a person at the edge, the effect only getting more intense the closer the center or rotation. If this were the case, we would notice a very significant gravity difference from one pole to the next. Rotating the disk only adds more inertial force to the edges of the disk. Based on the logo of the flat earth society, people in the northern hemisphere would see the least difference in inertia, but the Southern Hemisphere would see the highest. Considering the gravity of earth is fairly consistent throughout the planet (again, relative), the rotation vector can't be it either.
Basically, having a flat earth go around in a circle would create a very noticeable difference in g-forces towards the center of rotation. Not the center of the disk, the center or rotation. And that has little to do with gravity. That's physics for amateurs!
Coriolis effect isn't observable in Minecraft
German Pepe... That's not how that works lol
10:28 Why can't it just go the same speed to keep the same gravity?
I'm pretty sure that it would be because if you were standing on it and it stopped accelerating, both you and the flat world would be drifting through space at the same speed. If you pushed off of it to try to walk or something, you would then be moving faster than your world, pretty much making you float away.
you would need acceleration to make that artificial gravity, as Jordan said if you just pushed off of the flat earth, you would be making your velocity greater than earths, basically meaning that there is no artificial gravity.
Dylan Maloney can I mention terminal velocity. In terms of gravity the acceleration stops at a certain point, which is terminal velocity. So, How would you reach the speed of light if capped by terminal velocity?
Dylan Maloney yea. I guess so. Another tangent. Wouldn't the floating mass end up impacting space bodies eventually, like an asteroid or another earth?
THE ZOMBIE TRAINER That is a good point, though. The planet wouldn't slow down because it has no friction to slow it down
5:59 even if it's spread out... you would calculate the gravitational attraction using F = Gm1m2/r^2 using you and the minecraft world as m1m2, and the distance between you and the centre of mass of the minecraft world as r, so the gravity is not negligible, and would get weaker as you got further away from the centre of mas as gravity gets weaker, and the gravity would be in the direction of the centre of mass, so it would be pulling you more and more sideways as you got closer to the edge
Actually relativity would only have the effect of reducing the acceleration from the perspective of a stationary observer, it would not do that for anyone on the accelerating world because relativity states that all reference frames are equivalent including ones that accelerate and/or spin.
I suddenly realized that something must be seriously wrong when the video said, "Your character will start floating off into space as you approach the speed of light." The obvious question is: the speed of light relative to what? There's no absolute way to measure anything's speed; speed can only be measured between two objects. So it's Minecraft world and what? And why should our choice of reference object affect the energy needs of Minecraft world's rockets?
Underrated post.
Mr. Bacon nice bait
True. There would be no *observable* effect due to relativity; the only observable effect of your increased speed would be that, as you speed up *relative to the stars*, their light would blueshift, into ultraviolet, X-rays, and eventually gamma rays. So apart from all life being gradually killed and then vaporised, it's all good!
Cosmo Goblin 😂 lol
6:50 Oh Austin, what a horrible rocket launch that was...
what is the Rocket thing he used in the vid?
It's a rocket, build in the amazing game Kerbal Soace Programm.
What else would it be?
I guess I didn't explain that very well, but I was asking about the game. and thanks
and that is why you use struts!
Saturn V: I am the most powerful rocket
The Soviet N1: Am I a joke to you?
this is great show, but what about first law of gravity? if something moves and its not disturbed by any force, it keeps on moving and no power is needed to continue this motion (sorry, bad english)
Jakub Herbuś The problem with that is that the earth would need much more fuel to keep accelerating. When the fuel runs out, it would move at the same speed forever, so no G-Forces would be felt. The velocity would stay the same, but acceleration is needed to feel G-Forces.
The first checkmate. Minecraft has a horizon.
.... Video cut down to a few minutes
Minecraft doesn't have a horizon... what could possibly make you think that?
do you know what a horizon is?
No, it doesn't. It does have a rendering border (which is basically a limitation set by your computer's strength and graphics settings you set ingame).
Because Minecraft actually, literally, occurs in a plane, if you could possibly render all the chunks at once, you could see till your resolution would no longer be high enough to determine any features. No horizon.
Austin: 32.8/ms
Also Austin: 9.1/ms
O shit here come the matpat fanboys.
Hi
No, we like Austin and MatPat. They do different things normally. Austin does a lot of analysis on how it would actually work and what would happen because of it, MatPat does things with a new idea and evidence within the lore of games to support his hypothesis/theory.
Sup
I prefer both.
ThatOne Do you not understand sarcasm?
That’s a lot of swearing compared to the GT versions
I love how at 7:27 the subtitles add a swear, even though Austin doesn't swear.
I'm curious as to how you limited a technically infinite world to find a surface area for it
KosherKitten I think he used the player character's falling speed to calculate gravity and then the gravity to calculate its size. Though how he got the surface area I don't know.
Surface area is 60 billion squared square meters. That's where the border is
Maybe hes using console minecrafts? On PC it does go on infinitely until the file gets so large your computer cant handle it. I think even the issue of the badlands has been fixed which use to be considered the edge of the world. But that only because the algorithm started messing up pretty bad at that point.
Minecraft has a limit at like 30 million blocks where you can't get past
The software can only generate a finite amount of chunks, which is why there's a barrier at at "edge" of the world, which is X/Z +/- 30,000,000. Go outside the barrier and it tries to keep going, but weird things start to happen. For all intensive purposes, that's the size of the world.
Ah, cursing Austin
Even though I never played Minecraft, the world in the game is round, you can see at 4:12 that the stars come up on the horizon as the camera moves forward.
If you want to experience a flat earth. You should come to Denmark! the highest point is 170.86 m (561 ft) Thats even more flat than minecraft :D
Frederik Bøgelund Denmark looks like it's sinking into the Baltic Sea.
*Ahem*Netherlands is mostly below sea level*Ahem*
ikr come to the netherlands were you can smell the sea if you are just about to die from the sea(save the enviroment because the tempature is going to raise and the sea too we are all going to die) 😱😱😱😱
hey Shoddy.
Maybe bedrock is just super dense and is acting like the core of a planet.
Super dense ? But you can mine obsidian , which is super strong , so how could you not mine bed rock? How strong would bedrock have to be for you to not be able to even scratch it with a diamond pick axe.
Diamond is strong but not hard. Obsidian and bedrock are also clearly different materials with no comparison able to be done.
maybe it wasn't bedrock they have redstone and redstone doesn't exist
Totole But then the bottom of the world is super dense, whist the top is not, meaning that it'll probably collapse in on itself, creating a ball. Secondly, He doesn't even go into the fact that there is a 10 minute each day/night cycle, which would mean that the 'flat' planet would have to be spiralling, not traveling in a straight line, requiring RIDICULOUS Delta-V to sustain.
I wasn't talking about flat-earth here. I was just saying that the bedrock could be what is the "core" of minecraft's planet.
Wait, if your in space and you are at relatively the same speed and it just stops, wouldn't keep going since there are no other natural sources in space?
Why the fuck did Austin and matpat make a video of minecraft about flat earth theory and On the same fuckkkkking day -_-
I Don't Get It.
Don’t worry, I do :)
I have this theory that Minecraft is a future where nuclear bombs mutated and killed everyone (hence villagers are weird and monsters). And you are the last human(s) alive
Game Theory just dissproved your video like 30 minutes ago.
No, more like proved it, and created a solution. Aka they both were right.
And you trust GT? Are you alright?
Actually they focused on different aspects of the Minecraft world theory. Shoddycast focused on could Minecraft's world be flat and Game Theory focused on could the Minecraft's world be cubed.
Mate, I do trust them, that doesn't mean I don't fact check. Fact check most science videos I watch. When you make your own it's what you do.
Hey dumbass, this video is three hours older than game theory's
I'm not even going to bother watching this clickbait garbage.
The answer is No.
Its still pretty damn entertaining though.
You're right, the answer was no, but he goes into the science behind why not as well.
I usually turn AdBlock on when Its a video that will clearly be stupid or is clickbait. In this case both.
This isn't a video on proving the earth to be flat lol
Simple solution: When you approach light speed slam on the breaks, so you can accelerate again. What could possibly go wrong?
I'm a bit early here. Let me make a joke.
Read more
You want to hear another joke?
Your life.
What corner of hell did you crawl out from
the west 1, I saw him...
All hail our king
Haha original
but you are in space.........You would only have to accelerate it for one second because objects in motion tend to stay in motion
Erattic8 in space there's hydrogen atoms creating friction, slowing it down. Even if you were to ignore that, it would keep on moving just not accelerating, meaning that gravity would work differently. It would move at a constant speed that wouldn't change, so you'd fall at a constant speed without accelerating, which is not how gravity works in minecraft or in real life (it is required for it to work in real life as well, because this whole theory's basis is the equivalence principle)
hydrogen? arent you flying trough vaccum?
Jakub Herbuś a vacuum still has particles, the least dense region in space is 1 molecule per cubic meter
Using your logic, things would come to a stop when traveling in space, which would eliminate asteroids and comets, and the big bang theory wouldn't have actually worked, as things immediately started slowing down with friction to a standstill in space.
unidentified guy Things do slow down from friction, it's just that the forces that slow them are so insignificant that it won't cause a noticeable difference in speed over time
it made me chuckle that while you were talking about good anime, there was a screenshot for rasario vampire on the screen
try no game no life its an epic anime
6:59 my biggest flex is that i've built that lego set twice and both times it was under 6 hours
9:05 once it's moved that much in a vacuum (say in between galaxies) you would keep the same speed due to no forces changing your speed BECAUSE SCIENCE
I think the worst part of these shows is the fact I now enter every social interaction by saying "Hi! It's Me, Woody!"
Thanks Austin. Way to make such an awesome show I'm now subconsciously mimicking you.
Thanks this helps alot! im doing a hw assessment disproving flat earth and by explain how eventually would have a mass and density of 2 juipters making the flat earth theory impossible can really help!!
I believe that your last part, about less and less acceleration being felt over time is only relative to an outside observer. To someone on the planet, the acceleration would keep going just fine.
When Austin said the Earth was flat, my mind was like," Is Austin taking drugs? Is he suffering from psychological disorders? IS HE GOING MAD?". Then he denies it 5 seconds later and all worries go away.
There's also the issues of A) the moon's steady orbit, B) the sun's constant presence, and C) the stars not disappearing behind every horizon constantly.
I was waiting for you to get to the 'acceleration isn't speed' thing from the moment you mentioned it would be a block flying through space.
There is only an invisible barrier that stops you from continuing. There are blocks after it, so you are limited to a part if the planet, not the entirety of it.
You can make infinite water with the banach tarski Paradox, even though applying it would be impossible it is theoretically possible.
The reason for the difference in gravitational field strength could be that in the mine craft universe has a different gravitational constant
You should do a short video series on the all the tech of Arpeggio of blue steel: Ars Nova
Thanks for the help with my physics homework. I knew I could come here for the difference between acceleration and velocity (also I can tell my parents I'm doing homework instead of watching videos)
Well I guess this makes sense. In some part of the universe there is a flat disc that is carried on the backs of 4 giant elephants which then in turn stand on a colossal sea turtle named A'Tuin.
"If you walk to the edge of minecraft it doesnt just wrap around!"
Well yes but actually no. You see it WOULD if there was no world border (or just before like 1.5 release) the only thing stopping that from happening is mojangs hardcoded limit once you hit 2^32 blocks would start to repeat however because entity coordinates are doubles youd eventually just hit x=Infinity
I think you could get round the perpetual increase in speed by sending the hypothetical flat minecraft world in a huge loop. If the parameters were picked right surely you could achieve the necessary acceleration from the change in direction rather than an increase in speed?
Send this to the flat earthers Facebook page and see what happens
10:25 Well, rockets get lighter as they burn fuel, which results in higher G-forces - so they will counteract relativistic effects slightly.
Have you considered its actually rotating a super massive black hole?
The void is a good contender for that and if you get it moving around it will stay in the proper higjt
funny Austin, you upload a video about this, a couple of days later than Matthew.
Most entertaining coincidence I've seen in a while xD
Good video, but a few points:
I would like to note that as the ship reaches relativistic speeds, it wouldn't actually "feel" like it's accelerating less, it would only appear from a stationary observer to be accelerating less. Because of the time dilation, you would still feel ~1g of acceleration the whole time. This is because you must always be consistent in your own reference frame. Sure, the sky might get blue shifted and meteorites would blow holes in the crust, but on the planet itself the world must remain consistent with itself.
There's also a point about the rocket. As anyone who plays KSP well knows, Nuclear rocket engines (and to a lesser extent, other chemical rockets) can be far more efficient than the F-1 rocket engines of the Saturn V. While in the long run we still need planet-sized reaction mass, using a barrage of nuclear bombs (Orion Nuclear Pulse style) for propulsion or an open cycle gas core Nuclear Thermal Rocket would make the rocketworld considerably smaller in propellant mass.
Perhaps it is more realistic to propose that Minecraft is on an absolutely huge, slow rotating centrifuge?