Prakhar, please bring Shivam Shankar Singh and/or Anand V on your talkshow The Art Of Conjuring Alternate Realities: How Information Warfare Shapes Your World
True guys, but he also stresses on the importance of 'dharma', which is widely misinterpreted among people. As he says, science is for the world which is seen, adhyatma is for the one who sees.
Pranav’s logic is so flawed and evasive. All opinions are biased as hell. When prakhar is trying to be unbiased and open to positive possibilities of religion, Pranav continues to be the cry baby that keeps making up excuses to hate religion.
Science doesnt care about skepticism if you give no promising evidence. Religion has been here for thousands of years, none of the religion has been able to prove any of its claims, hence its safe to say religion is unrational, unscientific and very dangerous.
He does not hate religion. He criticises people making links between religion and science. When there is no evidence to back up the claims made by the "gurus", you have to be harsh. Imagine if someone misinterprets your work and twists it to make a completely new sentence, would you just sit and do nothing? Only you know how to hate, Pranav was criticising irrationality. Please don't drag science into religion.
Why the hell these people are trying to depict Sadhguru as anti science, Sadhguru always tells not to believe anything without experience and that includes his own words. I am doing Sadhguru's yoga practices as it benifits me physiologically and psychologically, but I dont believe a single word Sadhguru says. There is no conflict with Science in Hinduism as there is no need of belief, only methods and techniques are relevant, philosophy and ideology has very little to do with true Hindu spiritual journey.
@@shashankgangavatiker7201 Then what is reliable? Many western scientists have said Advaita is in many cases congruent with scientific principles. If you're gonna go with one school of thought, you can't deny the validity of the other without proving the former is superior. Indian science always will have a place in the hall of fame. Just using Sadhguru as the strawman to basically say before 1800 we knew nothing is retarded.
Of course destroying (😂😂😂) Sadhguru is great way to get lot of views when you have no content of your own. Didn't expect this title from Prakhar...Well, understandable you are also looking for views.
@@rememberwhen7271 you know lots of youtuber acting as a science ke thekedar specially this youtuber ( science is dope) most of his videos are totally bulshit kindra brain washing at the same time
I am at that point in life where I can appreciate religion, religious leaders, spirituality or spiritual leaders without following anything blindly, i won't hate, i would surely disagree. I have watched his videos on Sadguru and Sri Ravishankar, though i agree with his points, i don't discredit these people as mere con men, they have substance to them regardless.
@@Shubhankar_mhkd +1 THESE UNSCIENTIFIC MANIACS THINK THEY KNOW EVERYTHING COZ THEY SIT AND CHANT "I AM NOT THE BODY I AM NOT EVEN THE MIND" FOR LIKE 100TIMES EVERYDAY...XD
@@Shubhankar_mhkd In fact buddhism is also theist religion Cuz it belives in Supernatural deities like Indra, Concept of Hell, Mythology like worshipping of phallus worshipping widely practiced in bhutan, Nirvan (illogical concept)
Ninja technique for more views :- Prakhar knows that he doesn't get views on this video... Then bhai ne Sadhguru ka photo laga diya ab To view milega hi milega... 😂😂🙄
i agree with many things that Pranav says...but when it comes to Sadhguru i think that all the social media game is just 1% of the actual ground work he is doing in transforming people and the planet.
Prakhar, you asked him a few leading questions that I think attenuated the convo. # Leading questions 10:2113:51 North India (and later Indians as a whole) are more susceptible (You basically forced him to agree with you and justify the statement) 28:3430:14 Morality coming from THE book. (There is no THE book from which Indian society draws it's morality, no 10 commandments equivalent) 14:51 He basically gave an intuitive answer. Is there any evidence of science not giving meaning to their life. Why are science and religion even competing ? Has science ever attempted to give meaning to people, or is it his presupposition. Therein, I think, lies a deeper, more genuine motivation for his content. I've seen similar motivations in other Abrahamic society atheists (3:41 evidently he used to consume a lot of 'that' content). The details may change, but the meta-narrative remains the same. The cult of God is to be replaced by the cult of Science. And the original sin is to be 'non-rational' and we must civilize the heretic so on. 33:10 There are a few Ayurveda journals (all fairly young). I don't understand why he thinks it is hard to isolate the active ingredient. It's a mix of multiple herbs, so, pretty much everything is a mix of multiple things. What else is scientific method for, if not eliminate possibilities. Few of the statements also sound a bit sus 7:50 'Whichever religion is in power' 10:14 When you glorify religion in a religious festival, it becomes problematic All in all, waiting to hear a more structured, longer interview-type thing.
There is no Book named "The Morals - Hindu/Muslim/etc.. " if that's what u meant..but morality is fed through mythological stories and legends of God and it's representatives..
@@networkengineer2734 Mr. चाटुकार, what is the religion of Taliban and what Are they doing?(Ans: Jihad) Instead of licking balls of liberals, take a deep breath and observe the world (like what are going on?, Which cult has high fertility rate, which country support slave till now), Observe in Bird's eye View whole world
That's why it is not a religion it is the Dharma, Sanatana Dharma, it changes with time, it respects science, if you say this is a wrong practice, they will not discard the dharma itself, they will correct themselves and move on with the culture. I believe this guys problem is not only with superstitions but also with the cultural sanatana pride of Indians (he is like dhruv rathee). The thing is you can't kill the dharma, even if I am an atheist, I am still Sanatana. EDIT: ATLEAST INDIANS SHOULD KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WORDS "RELIGION" AND "DHARMA". BUT FOOLS TODAY TRANSLATE "SECULARISM" AS DHARMA-NIRPEKSHTA WHICH IS SO DUMB! START CALLING IT "PANTH-NIRPEKSHTA" AND HALF OF THE ISSUES ARE ALREADY SORTED. 🙏
Tru bro. Hindu dharm is made of various opinions over the years. Influence of 1000s of books. There is no hard way like Abrahamic religion. There is no one rule. There is no supreme book.
@@vivekkumar-yf1ok you are again mistaking something here, Jain and Budhhism are also a manifestation of same sanatana Dharma, in Budhism there is indeed the concept of Dhamma, also I am someone who consider Islamic Sufi culture also as Sanatana, because they are all about love and righteousness, infact they were the one's who were bringing much needed changes in Islam, which the radicals didn't accept anyways.
tbh, no disrespect to the guest, he is still doing a better job than so called influencers. But Prakhar, mazza nhi aya, unfortunately the depth was missing from the guest and i get that like when he said ki we have innate code of conduct for morality in ourselves, i mean NO!! we are just the byproduct of our social conditioning by our parents, friends, media, etc. The best moral decision would come after a serious enquiry and that conscious free will decision will come and become your morality, obviously people will argue that the decision after deep enquiries are based on the limited experience you have and therefore u are a slave to your social conditioning but you can expand it now by negating what's shallow and non sensible and allowing your mind to gain knowledge by question everything till your capacity allows, this btw would be a better way to think and reach the best possible decision, i think in Nietzsche's ubermensch the same thing can be observed. Secondly I like the fact when he says intuition based thinking vs evidence based thinking, but he was not going deep enough with it, i think when you become curios enough you will know how to test your intuition based on experimenting in real life and have multiple non biased encounters to your intuition,I would not drag advaita vedanta in between but i think these scriptures are made by a lot of thinking behind it, so any interested peeps can look into it if curious about life as a whole, or i should say anything before discarding the facts you can get through religion.
Advaita vedanta are accepted by atheist schools too so🙄 i don't really consider the guest a smart guy. He's just like an average person using his straight up anti-religion logics
@aditya 22082002 yes i agree with evolution psychology, like fear of unknown, the urge for reproduction, etc etc i should have added that , thanks for pointing out, but living only based on that may and will lead to chaos, especially after having higher lvl of consciousness and intelligence. Wat i wanted to convey was evolutionary stimulus is not enough in complex situations, like suppose a child who is never exposed to the world suddenly encounters a kill or be killed situation he may choose solely based on survival, but i think life if way more than only survival, becoz then kindness, empathy, love for freedom won't exist much. Freedom fighters won't exist, or many other incidents where the most obvious action was to kill others but still chose not to wouldn't have existed.
With all that science claims to 'know', it still doesn't know a damm thing about death, which is the most fundamental and permanent thing about life. Sadhguru clearly says not to believe him, nor disbelieve him, just listen(if you want to), if you don't understand what he is saying, don't listen - simple. But, don't tell others about your views on Sadhguru, let them find out themselves. #savesoil lets make it happen 🌱
Sadhguru's logic of belief and disbelief is itself wrong.he doesn't understand that knowing something is also believing something bcuz believing just means accepting something as true and when u know something you're also accepting it to be true therefore you're also believing it
I don't buy this "don't believe, don't disbelieve" gimmick - belief and disbelief are the only two logically consistent positions given any claim, with evidence serving as the deciding criterion. Also, there are a lot of things science doesn't know - this does NOT mean that this baba is justified in pretending as if he knows it all without providing any justification whatsoever. Ironically, Sadhguru doesn't seem to follow the only sensible piece of advice I've heard him give to his followers - "Know when to say I don't know.."
Personal take. The major reason for the youth being less atheist is because the modern atheist are aggressive. They can't stand someone with beliefs, they out right hate them. And by nature humans are compassionate.
I don't see any people who are atheist and are aggressive but I am not saying that there are not atheist who don't do that. But, you will find examples of religious people being violent because someone goes against their ideology but here I am also not saying that every religious person does it I have seen many very calm people who handle this kinda things very well. What I am saying is it is false that modern youth are being less atheist because the atheist now a days are very aggressive. There are many factors behind this.
@@raktimamchiforthe4thtime445 Most religious people do not indulge in conversations as such, but new age Atheists seek confrontation & are no different from the Social Justice Warriors of the west. I believe both of them are the same cultural MARXISTS pretending to be something else inorder to gain mass acceptance in society.
@@lfds8342 even if he work for Christians but he did many good work like stop Sati Practices and child marriage and too much. We should respect him for that.
Do anyone of you people know when did sati and child marriage started? How many people actually practiced? "Empirical, evidence based conclusion"? Nobody knows the answer for this. The history textbooks in the ncert is a fake narrative which everybody knows. Please read the history properly. This Roy fellow was stooge for missionary. Converted a lot of people. So called social reformist lol. PS : read the atrocities of Muslim rulers first, you'll understand why sati and child marriage was done.
Pranav represent my thought process when I was 16 years old. I used to do this empirical, evidence based etc stuff on everything too after reading atheist pages all day. Thankfully I matured after reading about various perspective and philosophical literature on the subject. I still hold the same point of view, just equipped with better tools to defend them.
Science is empirical, there is no way around that. And pranav almost always discusses pseudoscience, and discussing pseudoscience is an easier job, it is all about asking for evidence or reasoning for claims. Philosophy may give metaphysical tools to judge scientific process or science as whole, but countering pseudoscience is not a difficult job, it is just being critical.
FenuGreek represents my thought process when I was 17 years old. Where I assumed intellectual superiority on anyone based on a vaguely started point and asserted it in a one-sided RUclips comment charged with rhetoric.
All they said was good but they didn't had guts to mention one word about Islam in the whole conversation. Also advait concept in upanishads is a masterpiece and will be better if we as a generation bring in those texts instead of ignoring them in name of atheism which is just another word for satisfying your ego.
Well i dont think the topic went towards islam so they didnt mention it but I have seen prakhar mention islam before long time ago on stream a few times. Also what if they dont have knowledge on islam? why should they talk about it? if they dont know about something why would they talk about it. That is useless.
My dear friend if I was an atheist born in the states/Europe I would criticise Christianity more if I was an atheist born in the Middle East I would criticise Islam more and if I’m born in the subcontinent what do you expect me to do ?
prakhar i have watched this guy on the pakistani mulhid channel for the first time..i liked him, then i searched about him on twitter, bhai iska asliyat udhar nikal gaya...he is actually against the hindus and specifically the so called UP CASTE, he likes tweets of islamists, a rational person never sympathises with those tweets which support HIJAB in classrooms. AGAR religion ko burah kehteh ho toh sabko kaho...why target only hindus???????.... *DOGLA* *SCIENCE is DOPE*
ok so you made all the effort to check his activity on twitter and called him anti national for his political views but you couldnt even check up his youtube channel where he has made an entire video exposing zakir naik the favourite preacher of islamists. that video gained lot of traction from ex muslims. where was hinduphobia in that? he has also criticised christian godmen multiple times. but u dont seem to care about that. every time someone questions the pseudoscience that is spoused about by people like you, they are tagged as jihadis. i mean had u criticised his political views that would have been absolutely fine but look at ur vocabulary. pakistani mulhid channel? this is the problem with guys like u and all those who dont even think before tagging people. again im saying this, had he made some hypocritical tweet its fine if u criticise him, but he has actively exposed islamists too. that is my point.
@@hetmehtaa he is not against hinduism, he is against pseudoscience and andhvishwas spread in the name of religion and spirituality. just check his channel and ull find videos where many of these so called revolutionary people have made baseless claims and no one questioned them in the name of religion.
lol, look at what sam harris has to say about religion (islam and christianity). Sam harris is the gold standard. Your "Science is dope" is trying to be a rationalist.
I would just say listen to everyone but don't let them influence you completely. Listen to what sadhguru says and listen to this guy as well, think about both the arguments and finally make your own decision. As at the end of the day each one them is a human and have their own perspectives to look at the things.
@Digvijay Singh 28:30 when prakhar asked .. Isn't structure of morality got reinforced because of religion? The guest clearly said that we are only looking at the posivites of religion. That clearly shows that he is here to tell the negative aspects of religion, which is fine by me but I am the person who will try to follow and propagate only the positives of my religion which I think I have the choice of doing so.
@@siddhantgarodia3381 Lol exactly, when you're so ignorant of accepting science and u don't know that air resistance might make a difference on too much lighter objecs but the gravitational force would pull them at same speed only
@@cosmiclegend4181 bro what are your academic qualifications ..don't feel sad ..you are not that good in science...first of all speed is scalar ... U meant velocity..but no velocity would be different ...the formula states that g or the acelaration due to gravity will be same. That too for a very limited distance
@@dr.subhadeepmondal2040 how much of that matters if i use speed in place of "velocity" here?? You're just trying to look a science geek by just pointing this out. Both are still almost same concept only. Also there's no reason to use velocity in place of "speed" here bcuz everybody knows in what direction gravitational force on earth will pull the object And idk from which formula you're concluding it but its a general fact that gravity pulls every object at same velocity only, we have a lot of times even studied that in school
Bro I challenge u Enroll for inner engineering complition Complete the process and then arrive at any conclusion u want Im not supporting sadguru but dude that guys meditation technique really changed my life. He meditation technique are legit Like just sit for intitaion process and see the magic
@@Sleezy5711 Keralites have a belief they have a better understanding of social cohesion, harmony, religion and so on. A condescending bunch of schmucks most of them (particularly Leftists).
@@Sleezy5711 they try to find faults in everything , if they can't find a fault in someone's argument, they will target him for his caste, birthplace, religion etc
7:43 That was exactly what was deterring me into looking at atheism objectively. Because it was more of a rebellion than about rationality or critical thinking. Hope that the scene will change and more and more people will at least come closer to it, if not fully into it.
Science is dope is talking like a teenage boy rebel holding the torch of science and debunking myths...his inner understanding of things and stuffs and his explanations are really childish and sub par than the content we actually get from this channel and from prakhar.... Prakhar I would request you to bring people like sir Abhijit chavda to have a more quality conversation and content.
But Abhijit Chavda is open minded according to you😂😂😂😂 although his content is filled with cultural superiority bias and whatever u said about pranav is just an argument from ignorance and also ad hominem bcuz u nowhere actually tell what did he said wrong instead u just adding labels to him
@@cosmiclegend4181 Wait so Western historians are "Open minded" and do not have Cultural Superiority bias ?? Yeah tell me about it lol. Your Colonial Hangover is showing my friend.
@@smedits2705 Yes but I'm talking about the liberal one's not of those time's you're talking about like see world of antiquity channel he's a nice historian
bro i have added such labels to pranav because i used to think like that when i was a lot younger thatswhy i connected ....its a very linear way of looking at things ....now talking about the so called science is okay and cool..but adding layers to a thought ...and having different perspectives and reducing the observer (in this case) a thinkers bias is the aim ........... and the religion is not needed for good behaviour is just a hokum ............ our human brain has evolved us to associate us with identities...the religious violence is not because of the religion but that disproportionate identity disorder ..which is also a very predictable variation in the entire human history.
Ugh another 30yr old manchild Bollywood hero trying to be Cool and get an identity by being so called Rational. Spirituality is about experience and not dogma. It's individual, discard once u have tired urself like millions other have and benefited accross the globe, through Yoga, through Shinto meditation and through other ancient eastern practices. Get a real Life dude..no one is mad about Superstition especially the spiritual ones and those who are , aren't even watching you what hypocrisy
Lots of disagreement. The over celebration of Science, Individuality resulting in over celebration of mind has lead to west’s skyrocketing mental health issues. Having being an avid listener of podcasts for 4,5 years now, I would say that I can recognise repetitive ideas under fresh label going nowhere. This black and white, binary approach of Science is not ultimate state of being.
My friend, how do we know that the West has more mental health issues than the ones present in collectivistic societies? In the West these issues are simply more visible. There's a greater awareness of these issues in the West.
@@dem0_o14You seem like a colonial fool🤡 to me....that science is dope guy's research doesn't even agree with his arguments ......just go and read his sources thoroughly and compare him with his sources and if you can't do this watch the video which I am pinning and don't believe it that easily go yourself do some research just don't spread hate without knowing anything lol.... ruclips.net/video/3Kgxfxg3Vq8/видео.html
@@dem0_o14 Most of his facts are assumptions and baseless. I have seen some of his videos they are all juvenile level, one-sided narratives. No am not a bhakt but an anti-andh bhakt.
This guy isn't passionate about "rationality" itself. But the use of rationality to criticize things he doesn't like. He'll never use "rationality" to criticize young kids being injected of puberty blockers because "science" thinks gender is social construct. But he'll use "rationality" to battle religion and other ideas he doesn't like. Like for this dude, wearing a topaz ring is superstitious but adding your "gender pronouns" is rational.
@@pleasemakethatface3579 i mean yes it's ok to be religious but conservative ritualistic is something worrying. Most Indians don't know any philosophy in religious text most people are just ritualistic .
Indians view science and technology as a tool that can better our lives *if used correctly*. They do not seek fulfillment from it, they do not consider “scientific living” as the ultimate goal of humanity. Even though I have a Robotics PhD, I agree with this viewpoint 100%. In Indian culture, deep fulfillment comes from recognizing your true identity and escaping the cycle of actions and their consequences. This manifests itself in vastly diverse forms - purely logical ज्ञानयोग, surrendering to the supreme being in a relatable manifestation भक्तियोग, deep meditation i.e. what we know today as just योग, vigorous action कर्मयोग, or a combination of these. To the extent that these things were not mentioned even once, and strawman issues like nofap, Sadhguru’s statement on lunar eclipses, or worshipping an idol made of cow dung were used to reject “religion” all together, I think both Prakhar and Pranav’s understanding of these subjects is ridiculously lacking. The incident of Govardhan pooja or worshipping the idol made of cow dung that Prakhar described with disgust inspired me to write this comment. Imagine, we are people who can see the supreme being in such a daily routine substance. It shows the beautiful and deeply practical manifestation of भक्तियोग we have developed over millennia! Cow dung is not some pot of poison. Indians have been using it in daily activities for millennia. Have we all died? Where are the bacteria Prakhar is so scared of? People have cooked their food and plastered their houses all over the country over centuries with cow dung. And Prakhar shits on that just because some Western so-called “rational thinkers” use it to demean Hindus? Shameful. Prakhar asked “why are Indians so uniquely susceptible to superstition”. Pranav gave a good factual reply mentioning mega Churches in the supposedly rational leader societies. But my answer is: Because we know that ultimate fulfillment does not lie in materialism. Today when there is a lack of qualified teachers who are able to explain the Indic philosophies of our true identity to the masses, some people do fall for the fakers, but they are the exception, not the norm.
Sir I an teen and impressed with your argument . I also want to learn about our culture and write befitting arguments like you . How can I learn it ?? Sir please share your Instagram I'd , I have bunch of more questions.
@@chanakyabhakt I don't have an Instagram account. For learning about our Indian culture I would suggest reading रामायण / महाभारत / भागवद्गीता. Preferably in your mother language. I started too late, so I used this lecture series in English by a Ramakrishna Mission monk: ruclips.net/p/PL2imXor63HtS4ewIKryBL4ZVeiaH8Ij4R. One more thing - don't feel unconfident when making arguments, if you have the knowledge within you. Remember, a lot of difficulty is added because we try to make arguments in English - a foreign language. Think about how much more confident you would be while making the same argument in your mother tongue.
You know good sir just keep it a secret don't tell them all that if they will try it they will be fulfilled just be fulfilled by yourself and after that I suppose you know enough.👍🌻
a robotics PhD that awesome can you tell me some interesting new directions robotics is going like out of factories and more like a vacuum robots integrations in day to day life like what is the next big thing in robotics which will be incorporated in our day to day life
Gobar has bacteria... Seriously.. I didn't know this cuz my teachers throughout the school used to say that it shows anti bacterial qualities in the presence of sun and that's why most people use gobar to basically clean their houses.. Mostly in villages..... I'm very confused right now... So if anyone has any knowledge regarding this plz clarify a lil bit for me... Feel free to teach me
Bro he has no fucking idea about things he is talking about. Gaanv mein kaache gharo ko har mahine gobar aur taalab ki mitti ko milake leepa jata hai. Baati aur choorma donon hi gobar se banne wali kor ya uple jo hote hain unke upar sek kar banaye hate hain. Jo govardhanji ki baat ki hai uske liye gobar basti ke har ghar se ata hai aur dahi bhi. Dahi ko pet wali jagah par dala jata hai aur parikarma ke baad mein thoda sa Prasad ke Roop mein Grahan kiya jata hai Uske baad mein Gaye ke bachde ke khur govardhanji mein gadaye Kate Hein.
Mere history ke teacher ek badi acchi baat kaha karte the:-Jab Tak Bharat mein Sanatan Sanskriti hai tab tak Gai,Ganga aur Govind Bharat ki atma ka abhimn ang bane rahenge.
@@parthsarthi2667 so what we are studying today in Psychology and philosophy etc after thousands years these things also become useless.. Jis Logic ko tum use kar ke 1000 years Purane Books ko useless bol rahe ho waise hi aaj se 1000 years baad jis Books philosophy ko tum bahut Great mante ho usse bhi koi tumhare jaisa chomu Bulshit bol dega so in short according to your childish logic the things which we are studying today it is actually a Bulshit which is declared after 1000 years... 😂😂 Kabhi chicha soch te ho bolne se pahale ki bol kya rahe ho... And do you know wo 1000 saal purana Kitab aaj bhi kyu relevant hai kyu uss samaya bhi tum jaise cht¡ye the aur aaj bhi hai...
We won't be able to do it because government is not working for it seriously they are totally destroyed.but yeah if a bit can happen it's better than nothing.
@@murtazazaza What is wrong with that? These videoes should be reached to large audience right? A random person who doesn't know about Prakhar or Science is dope will never click on these videoes.
Instead of looking on the severity of the problem of soil, they want to prove how smart they are by discussing about Sadhguru and wanted to get views out of it. This is what overthinking and selfish mind does to you. Please keep all your rational thinking in your pocket , if it cannot be used in any way to benefit the world. #savesoil
I was just thinking about prakhar and pranoy to collab yesterday and here it is!! It's good to see prakhar is doing so much collab and conversations ✨✨ keep doing the good work prakhar ✨✨
Pranav (science is dope) sees things through a microscope and only tries to absorb what he thinks is true and justified, he is so close minded which annoys me. we may not agree on all things but that doesn't mean u can throw vile tantrums like a butthurt. I always urge people to not believe everything blindly, listen to what both parties are saying and reach a conclusion using your own cognitive abilities, always be skeptical of yourself , you may not be true all the times just try to accept your shortcomings and try to correct them and grow to be a humble being. please don't be like Pranav be openminded
Ironically, it is people like Pranav that think of themselves as "rationalist" and "universalists" when their entire world-view is influenced by their tunnel vision.
At least tell me what close minded thing u found about him and if you're just asserting he is close minded without actually giving proper basis then you're simply using the fallacy "argument from ignorance"
No fap is essentially important if you want to quit porn. In my case after completing 10 days of noFap I am feeling more energetic and more confident, I am now more career oriented and ambitious then ever before. In the end it's all about your own perspective. I started it and I am seeing some good results...
😂 lol , yes I was also used to be thinking that i am an atheist but now i know who I am !👍 Atheist is nothing but just idea of believe in nothing but actually they believe in nothing , nothing in india means " Shiva " Shiva means voidness means "shunya" 0 , zero or nothing , so now I know Shiva !🙏🕉️
@@avinashkeot7402 many idiots are trying brother 😂😂 but they will never be able to bcoz Sadhguru never clings to any belief systems as such😂 only what you have experienced has to be trusted, rest everything has to be doubted and seeked🧘♂️🌟💕
Ye takla apne ko bahut bada rational aur scientific minded banta hai. Iski baaton se lagta hai ki Enstein bhi Ishse tution lene aata tha. Takla kahi ka.. Internet se thoda ulta sidha information kya le leta h ki apne ko Guru se bhi upar samajhne laga hai.
idk why but pranav is only pointing out hindu godmen and christan slavery but why didnt he mention the most peacefull religion of the planet earth once i m talking about islam.and his reasons against sadhguru are just too weak man need to do some homework before going into the debate or you will represent youself as a propagandist nd i believe you are not,, it is just you dont like sadhguru which is acceptable but going all against a man who can dismantle you within seconds ,you really need strong arguements against him.
@@shashankgangavatiker7201 sorry, but there is different e b/w 2 lines . 1. I don't care if god exist or not 2. I don't believe there exist a god or I believe their is no god. Second one is clearly a believer too, just that he / her doesn't believe in God.
@@TarunKumar-ef7vbNo, you are confusing rejection with refutation. There is a difference between saying - 1. "I don't believe God exists" and 2. " I believe God does not exist" This is not just word play. The second statement is a belief in a positive claim (that God does not exist) which is required to meet its burden of proof by providing evidence to support the non-existence of God. The first statement supports no claim but is rather a dismissal of the claim "God exists" based on lack of evidence. No beliefs are being asserted here, is just that unjustified beliefs are being evaluated.
Ok so I had a friend in class 11 who used to say God doesn't exist and used to make fun of bhagwaan krishna by saying he had the real fun with gopiyaan(he was himself a hindu). Later in 12 he became so polarized he was literally verbally abusing munnawar Faruqui for doing that joke and said why always hindu gods are made fun of......
Indian Leftists and Anti-Hindu forces are responsible for redicalisation of Youth. If you keep attacking a particular faith at some point they will retaliate.
India me sidha simple hisab hai. Logo ko koi probelm nhi hoti jab tak joke dusre k religion par ho. Mera dost aadhe ghante ka lecture dega k religion par joke nhi karna chaiye aur fir baithkar Lucifer dekhega.
@@digvijaysingh4585 indian left namuna hai. Par Liberal hamesha se har religion ka majak banate aa rahe. Ab west me sabse zyada joke christianity par bante hain kyuki waha k logo ko usse relate kar pate hain. Mujhe life of brian jaise movie samjh nhi aati kyuki mene christianity k stories nhi padi. So, jaha jo religion majority me hota hai, joke uspar zyada hote hain.
Munnawar faruqi was scandalizing deities in the name of Joke. It's insulting someone. Please try to understand the anti hindu propaganda and bashing. Just like you can't scandalize Courts, you cannot do that deities of our religion. There's a difference between joke and insult or soft abuse or sometimes abuse.
Most of us thinks the practice we follow in the name of dharma is real Hindu dharm but they are totally wrong and does not have any knowledge of Dharm but if you just go through Ashtavakra Geeta or Upanishads (currently I am reading ashtavakra Geeta) they come to know how great great great The Hindu dharm is...
@@romilmahant2971 There is no correct meaning of Dharma. Dharma is what you chose to make it about. Hinduism has always been about the all paths lead to the same goal way of life, no reason why we shouldn’t use that analogy while examining Dharma.
Something to all the pro-science guys with a scientific touch, "Absence of proof is not necessarily proof of absence ". Being pro-science is no different than following religions, food for thought.
@@vijaysolanki6593 The problem is the way this statement is used to promote quackery, just use this argument to justify any kind of bullshit hypothesis
As a every writer or podcaster you have not taken a name of one religion. Because you know if you take name of their god you already know what is the situation you will face in future. There is a idiom in gujarati પોચુ ભાળે ને ત્યાં જ આંગળી મારે Means you always poke those people only that you know they not going to hurt you at any level.
Tbh dude pranav has even made videos on Islamic clerics where he debunked Zakir naik's false claims. When it comes explicitly to scripture, he hasn't made any videos on Hinduism too because that just isn't his genre.
@@ritayanchaudhuri8516 Muslims don't take Zakir Naik seriously. Infact he is banned by many Muslim organisations. So no fatwa for speaking against Zakir . Pranav is smart so he cherry picked Zakir, doesn't dare speak on Moulvis or Islam. He knows the consequences.
Knowledged people who believe in God, do trust in false practices which're non-religious and simply influenced by some god-men or whatever.. understanding and bridging the gap between God truly depends on oneself... ❤️
God-men is a term which media has propogated otherwise you pick up any guru who has shown path and transformed people claiming as God-Men you take sadhguru he is a guru a guru means one who dispells darkness where is GOD-MEN imply here pls be conscious while picking up words as it changes the trajectory and the meaning of what you say
Science is dope is one of my favourite channels as he is one the few youtube channels that debunks pseudoscience and tries to educate people with scientific rationality... It was great to see you guys collab and make this podcast happen..Great content Prakhar 👍
But if we look from a broader perspective, it's insignificant. He's kinda making myth busters. People who follow those people he debunks, won't even search his channel and if they come across, they will disagree. Also science is dope some times wrong, watch his Vedic math video, it was utter bs. In Praveen mohan too he was misleading. And shark tank video was an attempt to get views. Personally there is nothing special what he's doing
@@kaustubhprakash1273 people who are thinking a bit rationally automatically increase their skepticism at a point without any Richard Dawkins or Sam Harris. Their intelligence eventually leads them to a conclusions from conclusions. Which can be theism to athiesm, or athiesm to theism. This happens whole life, the more they think, research, observe the further they go and stronger their opinions become. Just like nearly everyone getting into science or philosophy becomes athiests, but people who are in the game long term, become agnostic and switch back to theism. And that's the point. One of the first steps of the millions in gaining wisdom is acknowledging things you can never know.
@@sigmachadtrillioniare6372 I think plenty of us have had the questioning God and atheism phase and returned back to theism. It’s just that something about the complexity and brilliance of the Universe makes you feel, in the heart of your hearts, that there is God. Maybe not as a father in heaven, but just as an entity, or even as the Universe itself.
@@thephilosopherwhojoked4249 absolutely, and not only that. I have many many reasons to turn back to theism. Hypocrisy in athiest arguments were also a reason. They claim to have “debunked” many of theist arguments for god, but all they do is make broad assumptions with zero mathematical and scientific backing themselves. And on internet oh god, they're all just making stupid sarcasm, and using repeated quotes from famous athiests. Also, my athiesm was based on Christian and islamic claims if God. When I actually read about daoism, budhism, Confuciusism, zen budhism, hinduism. My athiesm got struck. Their depiction of time was way better, an infinite cycle of life and dead through bodies of various species. No permanence was the only reason I belive in them. Because it's a well established undeniable fact, that nothing is permanent. Neither death, nor life neither pleasure nor suffering, the only permanent thing is the cycle itself, and inorder for this chaous to end, on shall attain Nirvana, also known as moksha
You have a logical human mind Prakhar while your guest is humanoid with AI. Life is not all about algorithms ....life would be much more happy and content when we know that Someone up there is taking care of us. We all are rebellious at some stage of our lives... against our religion ,our parents ,the society but when we come out of the phase ,we realize that they were right in some way.
This is so true, I was against every thing you mentioned but my faith is restored and this time it’s rock solid. Really ancient India was way ahead in every sense. If we just eradicate all superstitious and malpractices then no one would be close to us in terms of culture richness.
@@jain_saiyam it’s like saying “agar Ramayan se sita Ko Nikal de, toh Raavan Ek Bahut Achha Aadmi Tha” Are bhai Sita Nahin hoti to Gita Hoti, Ravan toh wahi hai na.. and again if you remove Sita completely from Ramayana then it would be some other story…
No, it won't be .. tell the same thing that there is someone to take care of them who is so unfortunate and fill with misery not because of his own fault but because of some disaster like tell it to someone who lost everything in a earthquake or natural disaster....... You have to accept that we are tiny specs in this vivid universe and nature.. and we don't matter much .... Anything could happen at anytime...... And the unvierse and nature will keep going... Our elders especially Indian elders are load of crap that's why we don't have critical thinkers and philosophers like we used to have... This submission to authoritative arguements is bullshit.... If you are actually strong enough you have to accept the fact that what we are and start understanding things from there
For a WhatsApp scientist Science is always dope. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.This Pranav blocked me on his youtube channel for exposing him badly.😂😂SHAME ON YOU PRANAV, NOWHERE TO HIDE YOUR FACE.#SaveSoil
@@MkMk-rp1wb Yeah.People have obviously ignored him.Ask him how trees has he planted in his life criticizing Cauvery Calling?????Just busy mocking other people without any evidence.......#SaveSoil
@@bhaveshtochabbra6853 Let's take #Savesoil movement:This idiot says that how riding a bike could save soil???But the fool doesn't know that by 2045,40 % lees food and by 2050 90% of our agricultural land will be UNCULTIVABLE!!!!!!!.Also he was criticising Cauvery Calling Project without doing proper research just baseless accusations so I just mentioned few facts and he blocked me.BTW 72 nations have already pledged to #SaveSoil movement and Govt of India recently allocated 19000 crores to revatalize 13 rivers of India based on Cauvery Calling success.#SaveSoil
I totally appreciate Pranab's scientific critical analysis of Sadhguru's talk on various topics science, but he should also highlight the various scientific studies done on the meditation techniques taught by Sadhguru which have impacted millions across the world and not simply disregard his immense contribution to the society.
@@lucky_lolI watched a video of him debunking the whole distance to Sun in Hanuman Chalisa. I checked his comment section and all of it was just a rave for atheists. They were outright mocking Hanuman Chalisa. And funny part is, he was hearting those comments too. Now I watched another video done by project Shivoham and he also came into the same Conclusion. But he was more courteous and respectful. Not only that he later released videos highlighting the multiple knowledgeable aspects of Hanuman Chalisa. If you want to watch true unbiased content regarding all of this, go watch Project Shivoham not this guy who is just a south Indian version of Dhruv Rathee.
Mahashivratri what? There is a day called national science day where you two who have 0 contribution to science get excited just like we spiritual people get excited on mahashivratri.
@@kandaghatvalley181bro do you know how much economy, revolve around, how many beautiful architecture and temples made for it , do you know how many good quality music and song made for it , do you know how many people gathered like family for these special occassion in this fast running world where people who are literally social animals but don't have time to meet loved ones , do you know doing fast even in name of God helps your gut to be good , how can you be rational if you are not looking at every aspect of something which you are disscussing
@@Kaal3339 brother keep clam the economy you are talking about is not progressive and I do fast on shivratri and help in the temple when we have shivpuran in our village for 11 days but I don’t believe in your fake following for god in the name of science and economics you pick select science when you need to prove god or prove anything related to god and most of you guys have lost their own culture and tell others what religion is by reading some article on internet we have a cultural society in which I have not forgotten my culture but you guys have own religion doesn’t ask for anything it’s allows ours to question everything even the gods we believe in and follow it gives us the rite to find our own path but not to follow blindly these political parties and dhongi babas like most of the India follows know your own culture like village people do
Title is misleading. The quality and quantity of arguments, thoughts raised by Pranoy were pale compared to what Prakhar had to say and ask. (I come from a rationalist clan). Simply love the clarity of thought Prakhar has !
@@dem0_o14 lol. You don't even know me. If you did, you would know that I am such a big anti-Sadhguru. I just said this because I have Science is dope and Prakhar's videos and they just spew bullshit with 0 knowledge. If this guy really needs to speak on this topic, he needs to spend like 1-2 months with Abhijit Mitra actually going into the nuances of the topic or a good physicist or scientist (I mean, he has connections with that 30 under 30 scientist and IDK why doesn't he do like a detailed science stream with him. He can even pick anyone from stupid IIT and they will have more knowledge on the topics related to science). But he is just overconfident asshole in everything. he is selling 15k courses on crap material that a person can anyways learn if he/she puts in a little more effort. To lead a good daily life, we don't need so much philosophy. I have talked to him on discord also and he was like that everyone should think so deeply and I asked him what if we are not interested? and he had no answer. So, he is a fluke and does less research and speaks as if he knows everything and propagates his way of living as if it is the right way according to him and if someone, like Vedant, challenges it, he gets petty unknowingly. So, that is why. By saying someone is offended without understanding the context you just proved that you are a blind bhakt of your Prakhar Bhaiya. He is just doing business of philosophy and selling tags rather than ideas and I don't know anyone like Shwetabh even talks to him.
Prakhar looks so oversmart, it almost seemed that he's trying hard to look like an intellectual. Whereas Pranav is actually knowledgeable and is to the point.
This guy is breath of fresh air man. Prakhar you're right, a significant change from the mid 2000s or early 2010s has been there but I do have hope for the future. Thanks again for bringing him to the show.
Yes watch acharya prashant and project shivoham's recent video...Agnosticism , rationalism , atheism are also part of one of the 6 school of thoughts of vedas....So we cannot reject good parts of religion at all..It will make us slave of our natural instincts...Even Savarkar was an Hindu atheist...
@@adwaitvedant3297 savarkar literally justified consuming non-veg and said raping muslim women is fine (not throwing random stuff, check this out and you will be shocked). He added the prefix "hindu" cuz he wanted to form the hindu mahasabha and gain hindu support ! If one hasn't learned to be compassionate after studying vedas then Idk what has he even learnt from vedant lol
Prakhar, please bring Shivam Shankar Singh and/or Anand V on your talkshow The Art Of Conjuring Alternate Realities: How Information Warfare Shapes Your World
Raja Ram Mohan Roy was just a British agent sati was never part of Indian culture this was just British propaganda against India you should see Abhijit chavda video on this
yes bro Hindu all time nice person broo....he can't do nothing bro....before British no caste system bro....Mughal brought sati bro...Hindu society most progressive even 1000 year before...
@@RajaRam-xx1kp yes hindu ki baas itni gaalti thi ki woh baas united nhi tha varna ...... 😤 Jis tarah chandra Gupta maurya ne Alexander and selecus nicator ki band bajayithi ...... Usi tarah Mughal aur angrezo ki band bajate
I have so many questions! Normally what i understand from science is test and accept anything if it is true. But all the wrong theories(most of them in chemistry) were and are given by scientists itself. And another scientist comes and rectifies that this not true, my theory explains this concept better. And the world. But the same world accepted the previous scientist and gave appreciation(like Noble prize). So should we accept these theories as evidence according you guys OR should everyone in the world start experimenting each and everything and then act according to their results? Another doubt is that in the religious books(like Bhagwad Geeta, Bible, Quran) , they say that GOD is the reason behind all the creation and destruction of the universes, and scientists reject these theories, but till now i didn't get any answer that then how are the universes are created. I know most of the science knowledge guys tell some big bang theory or black hole theory or matter theory. My question is who created those matter/black hole etc.?? I have tons of doubts like these. If anyone is interested we can discuss these topics and I'll be ready to hear your point of view. Kindly reply to my questions with EVIDENCE!!
>my question is who created those matter/black hole And my question is who created the god? You'll probably say god doesn't need to be created or he created himself or he always existed, now why don't you apply this logic to matter? If god doesn't need a creator then why does matter need it?
Since your comment is respectful, lets have a good discussion :) 1. Yes you are right, science is about creating new theories and rectifying those. For an example take the newton's theory of gravity. The math works, but it is false and we have a new theory, given by einstein. But still newtonian mechanics works in most of the situations, and it's simpler than einstein's theory. It also has a ton of applications in the field of science. Another example is the bohr model of atom. It doesn't work for any other atom other than hydrogen, and we never said its correct for all elements. Now we have the quantum model of atom, which does prove to be correct mathematically. You know evidence based approach is the best for it. This talk doesnt really involve any concept that has only a mathematical proof or a really complex scientific concept. 2. Simply giving a placeholder(GOD) for something we dont know is not a correct approach to answer a question. You know since the time humans started thinking philosophically and scientifically, the need for a placeholder i.e. GOD started decreasing and decreasing, now its only the creation of universe. And you really wanna believe in a GOD placeholder for that question? Now when we say god created the universe, then we immediately are driven to think how the god is created. If the answer is he always existed, then from a causality standpoint, it makes no sense at all. Then how or why did he create the universe at some nth second, and how could that happen if he existed forever? 3. Your question of who created the things that we see around, is a fun topic to talk about. You see ever since the universe began, things obeyed in a particular way, we can call them a set of universally obeyed laws. These laws together mixed up with events chaining created a series of other events, and it goes on. Thats how stars are created, that's how sun is created, thats how earth is created. And thats how we are and our brains are created, thats how everything we see around is created. If you disagree with me feel free to reply, looking forward for more questions from you
1. The misconception that you have started out with is that theories are 'True' or 'False'- scientific theories are neither. They are simply the best possible descriptions about the observable universe supported by mountains of empirical evidence. Old theories are never 'proved false', it is just that new theories accommodate them as a part of a bigger picture to better explain new observations and to reconcile them with the pre-existing evidence. Unlike a previous answer suggests, Einstein didn't "prove Newton wrong"- Newton's law of gravitation is consistently accurate when dealing with non-relativistic frames of reference. Einstein simply expanded on Newton's work to include an additional set of observations which led outside of Newton's domain. 2. The idea behind God creating the universe is not a "theory", it is pure superstition. A necessary criteria for any scientific theory is that it must be supported by evidence, and there is zero evidence to support the existence of God. 3. Nobody knows how the universe came into existence, because nobody knows what happened before the big bang. This question itself may be non sensical because of time itself began at the moment of the big bang, you cannot ask what CAUSED the big bang because causality cannot exist without time...
Well to a certain extent, you're certainly correct about science. It's the nature of human inquiry and curiosity. I haven't done much research in terms of astrophysics, but as far as i know, the most feasible theory to explain the beginning of the universe of the big bang. However, instead of just accepting the big bang entirely, science still works on trying to think of more and different theories. However, most religions already justify it through scriptures, claiming it as evidence. Science never 'claimed', it 'proposed' it's ideas. Again, I'm not saying that I feel the big bang is a 100% accurate, confirmed theory, and I'm not sure what evidence is there for it. However the ones who need to provide evidence are the ones who claim that the universe was created by a supreme, omniscient being who simply (and conveniently) exists beyond time and space. The evidence needs to be provided by those claiming these extraordinary ideas. All i believe science does is reject this claim on the basis of the fact that there's no definitive proof of the existence of such a being, and nor does it provide any scope of improvement or criticism. Anyways, hopefully we can reach a proper conclusion has to how the universe began. Hope you could get some insight. :)
I think moralizing is a self-inflicted punishment. Example, someone trying to conform to strict beauty standards would think twice before eating a cake, and upon eating it, they would feel guilty for having committed the 'sin' of gluttony. We have internalized some moral norms that we use to inflict pain upon ourselves emotionally. Also, moralism leads to an affirmation of the status quo. As are the present state of things, moralists would always question the use of any kind of violence done by the individual against property or another individual, while ignorantly refusing to acknowledge the systemic violence that kills and harms people on a daily basic.
It's better than not having any morals at all. Then you fall in nihilism and existential anxiety. Having morals is, the only option. But we can make it better by having the right morals.
Agreed. Imagine a state wherein there are no rules or laws of morality ex: no capital punishment for murder or any sort of crime. And also everyone thinks freely(hypothetical) i.e they completely live in the present. Do u think we would have the same crime rate or more or less?
@@pulkitdhingra8351 exactly bro ye Jo hai na so called mainstream gurus vo nahi hai guru bahut saare guru hai jo ekdum genuine hai and saying that these gurus have this that is wrong cos again generalising is wrong
This guy is far from being a "science" man. All of his content have just become an echo chamber for atheists to confirm their biases. Science in general came this far with relatively higher accuracy in its explanations because it accepted it could be wrong at times, which boosted its potential to discover and experiment on a higher degree. Science makes arguments with reliable hypothesis and backings that have years of research in them. This guy is exactly opposite of what he says and advertises. All of his arguments contain "this isn't logical, this is psedoscience, this is bullshit" - He never puts an effort in his 10 min+ videos to explain any of his arguments with scientific backings (peer reviewed research papers, not some random article a google search away). Ironic that this guy calls his channel "science is dope" - more like "atheism echochamber is dope, yo dawg". All of the guys he criticises deserve legit criticism, but he is the last person who should be considered competent to do so.
Ever read the Tridosha principles Ayurveda which is it's foundation. It is a pseudoscientific belief with absolutely No empirical evidence to support it & lots of things written in Charak & Sushrut Samhita are just Factually incorrect. Ayurveda has contributions in the field of medicine by being pioneer of many Medical & surgical interventions. But that's not the excuse to blindly accept wherever is written in the scriptures without critical evaluation.
Totally agree. I respect atheist as they question even science but Pranav is a believer of science what an anthesis. Pure unadulterated pseudo intellectual is what he is.
Please differentiate between the ideology/ tenets of religion and that of it’s followers. In this regard , in the interest of fairness , if you read the Quran you will find your kind of logic- but you are skeptical without reading it - isn’t that unreasonable ?
Time cord - 30:10 Same Like you ,alws pick choose the religion by your convenience/bias/ narrative or m b the hatred..like not taking ones on the bad thing of Islamic atrocities but selectively cherry picking frm Hindu religion mostly nd Christianity sometimes.. these only define your nature of Baseness from fear towards one community of society … it occurs m b cz of your childhood connection to the state “Kerala” .. cz its a combination of communism+with Islamic over influence in ur nearby society nd from the past experience it alws makes(communism + Islamic XYZ) a deadly combination of Hindu + cultural hatred …
they understand if they will criticize the other religion their head will be chopped off and they will not be able to have dope science talks with each other without head
Prakhar got exposed,like just did what Pranav said. Just quoting rationality absolutely wrong,passion has nothing to do with it. We have facts and data and we just look in it. Come on Prakhar our guy isn't gonna fall for word play.
The thing is India is one the most religious nations on earth. Cow is sacred yet it's the place with worst health conditions for cows and largest beef exporter in the world. And the poor is still neglected, and prosperity is still slow. Meanwhile, the west is developed, introducing to the world, Hyperloop, electric cars, internet, medicine vaccine, smartphones etc. India still stays prideful on inventing 0 thousands of years ago. Dear India, religion isn't bad but please balance it with some reason - don't be too obsessed.
Thanks for calling me on Prakhar! Enjoyed talking with you!
Yo you're good man
I wonder why it's not pinned yet.
@science is dope Bruh, do you have reddit threads for breakfast, lunch and dinner?
Prakhar, please bring Shivam Shankar Singh and/or Anand V on your talkshow
The Art Of Conjuring Alternate Realities: How Information Warfare Shapes Your World
"Alllah ki maa ki chut" !!!
Think the man got famous from critiquing Sadhguru
Pranav should once debate with acharya Prashant!😂❤️
I am also looking forward to this
@@HarshitKumar-bv2ss we will gain nothing out of it. Acharya Prashant is not anti science, k what will they debate?
No point, they will basically agree on same points
Acharya parsant is a pro scientific man..
True guys, but he also stresses on the importance of 'dharma', which is widely misinterpreted among people. As he says, science is for the world which is seen, adhyatma is for the one who sees.
Pranav’s logic is so flawed and evasive. All opinions are biased as hell. When prakhar is trying to be unbiased and open to positive possibilities of religion, Pranav continues to be the cry baby that keeps making up excuses to hate religion.
Chup chutiye.religion ka koi use nhi modern age mei
Science doesnt care about skepticism if you give no promising evidence. Religion has been here for thousands of years, none of the religion has been able to prove any of its claims, hence its safe to say religion is unrational, unscientific and very dangerous.
He does not hate religion. He criticises people making links between religion and science. When there is no evidence to back up the claims made by the "gurus", you have to be harsh. Imagine if someone misinterprets your work and twists it to make a completely new sentence, would you just sit and do nothing? Only you know how to hate, Pranav was criticising irrationality. Please don't drag science into religion.
Why the hell these people are trying to depict Sadhguru as anti science, Sadhguru always tells not to believe anything without experience and that includes his own words. I am doing Sadhguru's yoga practices as it benifits me physiologically and psychologically, but I dont believe a single word Sadhguru says. There is no conflict with Science in Hinduism as there is no need of belief, only methods and techniques are relevant, philosophy and ideology has very little to do with true Hindu spiritual journey.
Not to believe anything without experience 😂 is the redflag. It's just ps anything poured before or after that sentence.
Because in the name of science their agenda is clear everyone wants to dominate the world and atheist are in that race too
Why would you believe in your experiences? How do you know that you're experiences are a reliable source of information?
@@shashankgangavatiker7201 Then what is reliable? Many western scientists have said Advaita is in many cases congruent with scientific principles. If you're gonna go with one school of thought, you can't deny the validity of the other without proving the former is superior. Indian science always will have a place in the hall of fame. Just using Sadhguru as the strawman to basically say before 1800 we knew nothing is retarded.
@@shashankgangavatiker7201 He knows it because I don't think he is mental like you.
I'M 100% SURE PRANOY SITTING IN KERALA CAN'T CRITICIZE I$LAM & CHRISTIANITY THAT BUILT ON DOGMA
Check out his channel he has already made video on zakir naik
He have made video on christian faith healers and on zakir naik
@@nawabshahzebuddin1452 lol, has he criticised quran and mohammad ??
@@MayankRai3 Has he spoken about what is written in the bible and quran ??
@@nawabshahzebuddin1452 HE HASN'T CRITICISED THE QURAN & BIBLE FOR DISCRIMINATORY VERSES BCOZ HE DOESN'T HAVE THE GUTS TO DO IT IN KERALA
Worst and biased talk
Of course destroying (😂😂😂) Sadhguru is great way to get lot of views when you have no content of your own.
Didn't expect this title from Prakhar...Well, understandable you are also looking for views.
Ofcourse, appropriating Sadhguru is also a nice way to gain a lot of views
Own*
Use your brain and figure out who's unscientific and who's scientific
@@rememberwhen7271 Sadhguru is Unscientific? Bruh. Because he made some claims which is not scientifically backed? Even our politicians do it.
@@rememberwhen7271 you know lots of youtuber acting as a science ke thekedar specially this youtuber ( science is dope) most of his videos are totally bulshit kindra brain washing at the same time
I am at that point in life where I can appreciate religion, religious leaders, spirituality or spiritual leaders without following anything blindly, i won't hate, i would surely disagree. I have watched his videos on Sadguru and Sri Ravishankar, though i agree with his points, i don't discredit these people as mere con men, they have substance to them regardless.
+1
+1
+1
👌
+1
Atheists in India be like.. भगवान की कसम खाके बोलता हूं मैं नास्तिक हूं..😂
Said no Atheist ever
@@Shubhankar_mhkd +1
THESE UNSCIENTIFIC MANIACS THINK THEY KNOW EVERYTHING COZ THEY SIT AND CHANT "I AM NOT THE BODY I AM NOT EVEN THE MIND" FOR LIKE 100TIMES EVERYDAY...XD
@@Shubhankar_mhkd In fact buddhism is also theist religion
Cuz it belives in Supernatural deities like Indra, Concept of Hell, Mythology like worshipping of phallus worshipping widely practiced in bhutan, Nirvan (illogical concept)
There's a phenomenal documentary of James Jani on MEGA CHURCHES, A must watch for everyone 👍
@SUGAR TEDDY yup its james jani latest doc. Story telling is also top notch 👌
Nhi dekh raha
That channel is GOLD
@@vatsalaykhobragade yes ! Indeed
Ninja technique for more views :- Prakhar knows that he doesn't get views on this video... Then bhai ne Sadhguru ka photo laga diya ab To view milega hi milega... 😂😂🙄
are cool guy agya
ruko likh leta hu upsc me na ajaye
i agree with many things that Pranav says...but when it comes to Sadhguru i think that all the social media game is just 1% of the actual ground work he is doing in transforming people and the planet.
Exactly 🙌
💯
What is that transformation? Where is it exhibited?
@@softgrowl apni g**d m jhanko...vahi laga hai exibition.
No shit
why not islam symbol
Coz that might have consequences buddy, start being intolerant and you won't see OM symbol too.
@@vijaysolanki6593 😂😂Itna sach bhi nahi bolna that yaar
@@vijaysolanki6593 bro you just said the truth, biggest good thing in our culture is the ability to question
@@vijaysolanki6593 he removed the thumbnail.
Saar nai bache gaa toh views leke kya krna??
Prakhar, you asked him a few leading questions that I think attenuated the convo.
# Leading questions
10:21 13:51 North India (and later Indians as a whole) are more susceptible
(You basically forced him to agree with you and justify the statement)
28:34 30:14 Morality coming from THE book.
(There is no THE book from which Indian society draws it's morality, no 10 commandments equivalent)
14:51 He basically gave an intuitive answer. Is there any evidence of science not giving meaning to their life. Why are science and religion even competing ? Has science ever attempted to give meaning to people, or is it his presupposition.
Therein, I think, lies a deeper, more genuine motivation for his content. I've seen similar motivations in other Abrahamic society atheists (3:41 evidently he used to consume a lot of 'that' content). The details may change, but the meta-narrative remains the same. The cult of God is to be replaced by the cult of Science. And the original sin is to be 'non-rational' and we must civilize the heretic so on.
33:10 There are a few Ayurveda journals (all fairly young). I don't understand why he thinks it is hard to isolate the active ingredient. It's a mix of multiple herbs, so, pretty much everything is a mix of multiple things. What else is scientific method for, if not eliminate possibilities.
Few of the statements also sound a bit sus
7:50 'Whichever religion is in power'
10:14 When you glorify religion in a religious festival, it becomes problematic
All in all, waiting to hear a more structured, longer interview-type thing.
Such a beautiful comment
@@pulkitdhingra8351 fr
There is no Book named "The Morals - Hindu/Muslim/etc.. " if that's what u meant..but morality is fed through mythological stories and legends of God and it's representatives..
@@mufaddal19 yes, communism (abrahmism without god) tried to give morality to people and it failed miserably.
@@mufaddal19 morality is fed with "secular" means as well, religion just tend to be the potent one among the lot
*Atheism is fading away from Indian youth.* That hit me hard !
So there's hope. Thank God.
@@naiyayika no Mr.Andhbhakt there is cult creation like Taliban not hope
@@networkengineer2734 yep ! and this time it's even bigger than Taliban.
@@networkengineer2734 to jihadi kya hua gando
@@networkengineer2734 Mr. चाटुकार, what is the religion of Taliban and what Are they doing?(Ans: Jihad)
Instead of licking balls of liberals, take a deep breath and observe the world (like what are going on?, Which cult has high fertility rate, which country support slave till now), Observe in Bird's eye View whole world
That's why it is not a religion it is the Dharma, Sanatana Dharma, it changes with time, it respects science, if you say this is a wrong practice, they will not discard the dharma itself, they will correct themselves and move on with the culture. I believe this guys problem is not only with superstitions but also with the cultural sanatana pride of Indians (he is like dhruv rathee). The thing is you can't kill the dharma, even if I am an atheist, I am still Sanatana.
EDIT: ATLEAST INDIANS SHOULD KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WORDS "RELIGION" AND "DHARMA". BUT FOOLS TODAY TRANSLATE "SECULARISM" AS DHARMA-NIRPEKSHTA WHICH IS SO DUMB! START CALLING IT "PANTH-NIRPEKSHTA" AND HALF OF THE ISSUES ARE ALREADY SORTED. 🙏
Tru bro. Hindu dharm is made of various opinions over the years. Influence of 1000s of books. There is no hard way like Abrahamic religion. There is no one rule. There is no supreme book.
Giving up culture doesnt happen because of youtube videos....we can only tackle bullshit....hindu culture is our part
What is "dharma"?
Cam u explain.
@@vivekkumar-yf1ok you are again mistaking something here, Jain and Budhhism are also a manifestation of same sanatana Dharma, in Budhism there is indeed the concept of Dhamma, also I am someone who consider Islamic Sufi culture also as Sanatana, because they are all about love and righteousness, infact they were the one's who were bringing much needed changes in Islam, which the radicals didn't accept anyways.
Wow, Mann! this is so so accurate.
tbh, no disrespect to the guest, he is still doing a better job than so called influencers. But Prakhar, mazza nhi aya, unfortunately the depth was missing from the guest and i get that like when he said ki we have innate code of conduct for morality in ourselves, i mean NO!! we are just the byproduct of our social conditioning by our parents, friends, media, etc. The best moral decision would come after a serious enquiry and that conscious free will decision will come and become your morality, obviously people will argue that the decision after deep enquiries are based on the limited experience you have and therefore u are a slave to your social conditioning but you can expand it now by negating what's shallow and non sensible and allowing your mind to gain knowledge by question everything till your capacity allows, this btw would be a better way to think and reach the best possible decision, i think in Nietzsche's ubermensch the same thing can be observed.
Secondly I like the fact when he says intuition based thinking vs evidence based thinking, but he was not going deep enough with it, i think when you become curios enough you will know how to test your intuition based on experimenting in real life and have multiple non biased encounters to your intuition,I would not drag advaita vedanta in between but i think these scriptures are made by a lot of thinking behind it, so any interested peeps can look into it if curious about life as a whole, or i should say anything before discarding the facts you can get through religion.
Advaita vedanta are accepted by atheist schools too so🙄 i don't really consider the guest a smart guy. He's just like an average person using his straight up anti-religion logics
Evolutionary psychology disagrees lol. Your whole answer is based on the assumption of humans being the blank slate
@aditya 22082002 yes i agree with evolution psychology, like fear of unknown, the urge for reproduction, etc etc i should have added that , thanks for pointing out, but living only based on that may and will lead to chaos, especially after having higher lvl of consciousness and intelligence. Wat i wanted to convey was evolutionary stimulus is not enough in complex situations, like suppose a child who is never exposed to the world suddenly encounters a kill or be killed situation he may choose solely based on survival, but i think life if way more than only survival, becoz then kindness, empathy, love for freedom won't exist much. Freedom fighters won't exist, or many other incidents where the most obvious action was to kill others but still chose not to wouldn't have existed.
@@varunpratapsingh1940 god exist guys I can bet my life on it
@@darwinhubc7481 ur name is quite ironical btw lol
With all that science claims to 'know', it still doesn't know a damm thing about death, which is the most fundamental and permanent thing about life. Sadhguru clearly says not to believe him, nor disbelieve him, just listen(if you want to), if you don't understand what he is saying, don't listen - simple. But, don't tell others about your views on Sadhguru, let them find out themselves. #savesoil lets make it happen 🌱
But if they don't shit on someone of famous personal, how would they gain view on RUclips. The thumbnail says it all.
Sadhguru's logic of belief and disbelief is itself wrong.he doesn't understand that knowing something is also believing something bcuz believing just means accepting something as true and when u know something you're also accepting it to be true therefore you're also believing it
Science knows about death. What did Sadhguru say about death
There is not much to know about death, and science knows everything.
I don't buy this "don't believe, don't disbelieve" gimmick - belief and disbelief are the only two logically consistent positions given any claim, with evidence serving as the deciding criterion. Also, there are a lot of things science doesn't know - this does NOT mean that this baba is justified in pretending as if he knows it all without providing any justification whatsoever. Ironically, Sadhguru doesn't seem to follow the only sensible piece of advice I've heard him give to his followers - "Know when to say I don't know.."
Personal take. The major reason for the youth being less atheist is because the modern atheist are aggressive. They can't stand someone with beliefs, they out right hate them. And by nature humans are compassionate.
I don't see any people who are atheist and are aggressive but I am not saying that there are not atheist who don't do that. But, you will find examples of religious people being violent because someone goes against their ideology but here I am also not saying that every religious person does it I have seen many very calm people who handle this kinda things very well. What I am saying is it is false that modern youth are being less atheist because the atheist now a days are very aggressive. There are many factors behind this.
@@raktimamchiforthe4thtime445 Most religious people do not indulge in conversations as such, but new age Atheists seek confrontation & are no different from the Social Justice Warriors of the west. I believe both of them are the same cultural MARXISTS pretending to be something else inorder to gain mass acceptance in society.
@@Albetroz1415 ya agree most atheist would want to have discussion about the existence of God.
If anything it's these religious idiots who are creating ruckus🤣
@@raktimamchiforthe4thtime445 The religious radicalization are Fundamentalist,Zealots,Extremist,PsuedoScience & WitchHunting
Raja Ram Mohan roy he is a Christian missionary tool he had a stone engraved in church of England for his works
Wtf
@@Batman-my7wx Actually, Raja ram mohan roy was a euro-centric crypto-christian.
So what?
Even if that is true ( I tnk it's not), what is the point you want to make?
@@lfds8342 even if he work for Christians but he did many good work like stop Sati Practices and child marriage and too much. We should respect him for that.
Do anyone of you people know when did sati and child marriage started? How many people actually practiced? "Empirical, evidence based conclusion"? Nobody knows the answer for this. The history textbooks in the ncert is a fake narrative which everybody knows. Please read the history properly. This Roy fellow was stooge for missionary. Converted a lot of people. So called social reformist lol.
PS : read the atrocities of Muslim rulers first, you'll understand why sati and child marriage was done.
Pranav represent my thought process when I was 16 years old. I used to do this empirical, evidence based etc stuff on everything too after reading atheist pages all day. Thankfully I matured after reading about various perspective and philosophical literature on the subject. I still hold the same point of view, just equipped with better tools to defend them.
Science is empirical, there is no way around that. And pranav almost always discusses pseudoscience, and discussing pseudoscience is an easier job, it is all about asking for evidence or reasoning for claims. Philosophy may give metaphysical tools to judge scientific process or science as whole, but countering pseudoscience is not a difficult job, it is just being critical.
FenuGreek represents my thought process when I was 17 years old. Where I assumed intellectual superiority on anyone based on a vaguely started point and asserted it in a one-sided RUclips comment charged with rhetoric.
@@berserk322 berserk represwntsy though process when I was 15 years old when I would repeat sentences said by my friend to irritate him
@@pulkitdhingra8351 a moderate use of mockery could correct vices
also dude you are 13. You either can't spell or type. Comprehending my comment would be asking for too much
My mans here doesn’t know enough about religion and the human mind to debunk it properly
The have no interest they are working for there belly only..!!
All they said was good but they didn't had guts to mention one word about Islam in the whole conversation. Also advait concept in upanishads is a masterpiece and will be better if we as a generation bring in those texts instead of ignoring them in name of atheism which is just another word for satisfying your ego.
But the question is why do we need these things? What is that which technology or human studies cannot provide you?!
Well i dont think the topic went towards islam so they didnt mention it but I have seen prakhar mention islam before long time ago on stream a few times. Also what if they dont have knowledge on islam? why should they talk about it? if they dont know about something why would they talk about it. That is useless.
@@deepeshbajpai4423 happiness? Why is there so much depression even in Western countries?
Agreed
My dear friend if I was an atheist born in the states/Europe I would criticise Christianity more if I was an atheist born in the Middle East I would criticise Islam more and if I’m born in the subcontinent what do you expect me to do ?
prakhar i have watched this guy on the pakistani mulhid channel for the first time..i liked him, then i searched about him on twitter, bhai iska asliyat udhar nikal gaya...he is actually against the hindus and specifically the so called UP CASTE, he likes tweets of islamists, a rational person never sympathises with those tweets which support HIJAB in classrooms. AGAR religion ko burah kehteh ho toh sabko kaho...why target only hindus???????.... *DOGLA* *SCIENCE is DOPE*
This episode is bullishit
I don't know why but people think, being against Hindu or any religion is a intelligence 🤦🏻
Bro he has made a video on that dr zakir naik , and proved him wrong completely ,he isn't biased towards hindus
ok so you made all the effort to check his activity on twitter and called him anti national for his political views but you couldnt even check up his youtube channel where he has made an entire video exposing zakir naik the favourite preacher of islamists. that video gained lot of traction from ex muslims. where was hinduphobia in that? he has also criticised christian godmen multiple times. but u dont seem to care about that. every time someone questions the pseudoscience that is spoused about by people like you, they are tagged as jihadis. i mean had u criticised his political views that would have been absolutely fine but look at ur vocabulary. pakistani mulhid channel? this is the problem with guys like u and all those who dont even think before tagging people.
again im saying this, had he made some hypocritical tweet its fine if u criticise him, but he has actively exposed islamists too. that is my point.
@@hetmehtaa he is not against hinduism, he is against pseudoscience and andhvishwas spread in the name of religion and spirituality. just check his channel and ull find videos where many of these so called revolutionary people have made baseless claims and no one questioned them in the name of religion.
Science is dope debunks myth without spreading hate... It's not that easy... He is very unique... 😊😊
lol, look at what sam harris has to say about religion (islam and christianity). Sam harris is the gold standard. Your "Science is dope" is trying to be a rationalist.
True
@@lfds8342 he is deleting comments too which makes logical arguments against his'
He reeks of bias in all his videos. He snobbishly strawmans all his targets.
@@ofAwxen faxxx 🔥
I would just say listen to everyone but don't let them influence you completely. Listen to what sadhguru says and listen to this guy as well, think about both the arguments and finally make your own decision. As at the end of the day each one them is a human and have their own perspectives to look at the things.
Some Perspectives are just wrong. Some Perspectives are more nuanced than others.
@@digvijaysingh4585 Religion is the name which our ancestors gave to the Science they didn't understand. How about this perspective?
@Digvijay Singh 28:30 when prakhar asked .. Isn't structure of morality got reinforced because of religion? The guest clearly said that we are only looking at the posivites of religion. That clearly shows that he is here to tell the negative aspects of religion, which is fine by me but I am the person who will try to follow and propagate only the positives of my religion which I think I have the choice of doing so.
@@trilokrathore9904 it's a medieval feudal idea aimed at controlling masses.
@Alexios I Komnenos did u read bhagwad geeta or u read any scriptures of hinduism?
ironically the science guy forgot that both heavy and light object falls at same rate under vacuum condition and not in every condition...
Lol exactly, when you just read books and forget real life applications. Ignored air resistance and drag😂
So isn't an object falling in earth is under vacuum condition only??
@@siddhantgarodia3381 Lol exactly, when you're so ignorant of accepting science and u don't know that air resistance might make a difference on too much lighter objecs but the gravitational force would pull them at same speed only
@@cosmiclegend4181 bro what are your academic qualifications ..don't feel sad ..you are not that good in science...first of all speed is scalar ... U meant velocity..but no velocity would be different ...the formula states that g or the acelaration due to gravity will be same. That too for a very limited distance
@@dr.subhadeepmondal2040 how much of that matters if i use speed in place of "velocity" here?? You're just trying to look a science geek by just pointing this out. Both are still almost same concept only. Also there's no reason to use velocity in place of "speed" here bcuz everybody knows in what direction gravitational force on earth will pull the object And idk from which formula you're concluding it but its a general fact that gravity pulls every object at same velocity only, we have a lot of times even studied that in school
Bro I challenge u
Enroll for inner engineering complition
Complete the process and then arrive at any conclusion u want
Im not supporting sadguru but dude that guys meditation technique really changed my life.
He meditation technique are legit
Like just sit for intitaion process and see the magic
@Sandkey just attend his intitaton process bro the emotion and experience that happens cannot be fake try it with an open mind..
@@mehulrajgor6441 Don't get got into his cult real gurus are people like Ramakrishna paramhansa, Ramama maharshi etc.
6:04 for raja ram manohar ray
Watch this video of abhijit chavda on same topic
ruclips.net/video/ivUv32ynD4Q/видео.html
The moment he said.. i grew up in kerela i knew this wasnt going to non biased
Kerala has unfortunately become a cesspool of marxists parading around as "rationalists".
Wtf so anyone from kerala calling out bs is biased? Gtfo here.
@@Sleezy5711 Keralites have a belief they have a better understanding of social cohesion, harmony, religion and so on. A condescending bunch of schmucks most of them (particularly Leftists).
@@Sleezy5711 they try to find faults in everything , if they can't find a fault in someone's argument, they will target him for his caste, birthplace, religion etc
@@Sleezy5711 most keralite have negative IQ.
7:43 That was exactly what was deterring me into looking at atheism objectively. Because it was more of a rebellion than about rationality or critical thinking. Hope that the scene will change and more and more people will at least come closer to it, if not fully into it.
Science is dope is talking like a teenage boy rebel holding the torch of science and debunking myths...his inner understanding of things and stuffs and his explanations are really childish and sub par than the content we actually get from this channel and from prakhar.... Prakhar I would request you to bring people like sir Abhijit chavda to have a more quality conversation and content.
But Abhijit Chavda is open minded according to you😂😂😂😂 although his content is filled with cultural superiority bias and whatever u said about pranav is just an argument from ignorance and also ad hominem bcuz u nowhere actually tell what did he said wrong instead u just adding labels to him
You guys are obsessed with identity nowadays.
@@cosmiclegend4181 Wait so Western historians are "Open minded" and do not have Cultural Superiority bias ??
Yeah tell me about it lol.
Your Colonial Hangover is showing my friend.
@@smedits2705 Yes but I'm talking about the liberal one's not of those time's you're talking about like see world of antiquity channel he's a nice historian
bro i have added such labels to pranav because i used to think like that when i was a lot younger thatswhy i connected ....its a very linear way of looking at things ....now talking about the so called science is okay and cool..but adding layers to a thought ...and having different perspectives and reducing the observer (in this case) a thinkers bias is the aim ........... and the religion is not needed for good behaviour is just a hokum ............ our human brain has evolved us to associate us with identities...the religious violence is not because of the religion but that disproportionate identity disorder ..which is also a very predictable variation in the entire human history.
The Richard Dawkins vs Jordan Peterson at home:
😂😂😂
Lol
No.
brahnhhhn😂😂😂
Nowhere near 😕
Ugh another 30yr old manchild Bollywood hero trying to be Cool and get an identity by being so called Rational. Spirituality is about experience and not dogma. It's individual, discard once u have tired urself like millions other have and benefited accross the globe, through Yoga, through Shinto meditation and through other ancient eastern practices. Get a real Life dude..no one is mad about Superstition especially the spiritual ones and those who are , aren't even watching you what hypocrisy
Another bitter Jaggi lover 😂
Lots of disagreement. The over celebration of Science, Individuality resulting in over celebration of mind has lead to west’s skyrocketing mental health issues. Having being an avid listener of podcasts for 4,5 years now, I would say that I can recognise repetitive ideas under fresh label going nowhere. This black and white, binary approach of Science is not ultimate state of being.
Do u think religious people or those who live in conservative societies like in India, don't have mental health issues??
My friend, how do we know that the West has more mental health issues than the ones present in collectivistic societies? In the West these issues are simply more visible. There's a greater awareness of these issues in the West.
Bro he himself is a wannabe science guy , he acts like master of everything and I still don't know why his viewers aren't skeptical about him yet
Go and find your ultimate state
@@anshulpaswan750 just like Sadhguru who's a wannabe godman
Prakhar ji... This guy Pranav is a very surface knowledge.. He is one more guy to be cool among bashing Indian culture..
🤡🤡🤡🤡 haa bhai... sadhguru toh boht deep knowledge rakhte hai science ki....
Someone talks facts = bashing indian culture 🤣🤣
Classic bakths
@@dem0_o14You seem like a colonial fool🤡 to me....that science is dope guy's research doesn't even agree with his arguments ......just go and read his sources thoroughly and compare him with his sources and if you can't do this watch the video which I am pinning and don't believe it that easily go yourself do some research just don't spread hate without knowing anything lol.... ruclips.net/video/3Kgxfxg3Vq8/видео.html
@@dem0_o14 Most of his facts are assumptions and baseless. I have seen some of his videos they are all juvenile level, one-sided narratives. No am not a bhakt but an anti-andh bhakt.
@@rabhav1443 Assumptions ? Baseless? I hope ur talking about sadhguru who never leaves a source for whatever he is talking
This guy isn't passionate about "rationality" itself. But the use of rationality to criticize things he doesn't like. He'll never use "rationality" to criticize young kids being injected of puberty blockers because "science" thinks gender is social construct. But he'll use "rationality" to battle religion and other ideas he doesn't like.
Like for this dude, wearing a topaz ring is superstitious but adding your "gender pronouns" is rational.
True his videos are more of a rant on religions. There are many people who are educated more that him in "science".
@@Aryan-ex2gg I mean some of them were needed..
@@pleasemakethatface3579 i mean yes it's ok to be religious but conservative ritualistic is something worrying. Most Indians don't know any philosophy in religious text most people are just ritualistic .
@@Aryan-ex2gg 💯 you left this 👑
@@ananysharma1633 to ananya, did you use to study in Amity Gurgaon?
Indians view science and technology as a tool that can better our lives *if used correctly*. They do not seek fulfillment from it, they do not consider “scientific living” as the ultimate goal of humanity.
Even though I have a Robotics PhD, I agree with this viewpoint 100%.
In Indian culture, deep fulfillment comes from recognizing your true identity and escaping the cycle of actions and their consequences. This manifests itself in vastly diverse forms - purely logical ज्ञानयोग, surrendering to the supreme being in a relatable manifestation भक्तियोग, deep meditation i.e. what we know today as just योग, vigorous action कर्मयोग, or a combination of these.
To the extent that these things were not mentioned even once, and strawman issues like nofap, Sadhguru’s statement on lunar eclipses, or worshipping an idol made of cow dung were used to reject “religion” all together, I think both Prakhar and Pranav’s understanding of these subjects is ridiculously lacking.
The incident of Govardhan pooja or worshipping the idol made of cow dung that Prakhar described with disgust inspired me to write this comment. Imagine, we are people who can see the supreme being in such a daily routine substance. It shows the beautiful and deeply practical manifestation of भक्तियोग we have developed over millennia! Cow dung is not some pot of poison. Indians have been using it in daily activities for millennia. Have we all died? Where are the bacteria Prakhar is so scared of? People have cooked their food and plastered their houses all over the country over centuries with cow dung. And Prakhar shits on that just because some Western so-called “rational thinkers” use it to demean Hindus? Shameful.
Prakhar asked “why are Indians so uniquely susceptible to superstition”. Pranav gave a good factual reply mentioning mega Churches in the supposedly rational leader societies. But my answer is: Because we know that ultimate fulfillment does not lie in materialism. Today when there is a lack of qualified teachers who are able to explain the Indic philosophies of our true identity to the masses, some people do fall for the fakers, but they are the exception, not the norm.
Sir I an teen and impressed with your argument . I also want to learn about our culture and write befitting arguments like you . How can I learn it ?? Sir please share your Instagram I'd , I have bunch of more questions.
@@chanakyabhakt I don't have an Instagram account. For learning about our Indian culture I would suggest reading रामायण / महाभारत / भागवद्गीता. Preferably in your mother language. I started too late, so I used this lecture series in English by a Ramakrishna Mission monk: ruclips.net/p/PL2imXor63HtS4ewIKryBL4ZVeiaH8Ij4R.
One more thing - don't feel unconfident when making arguments, if you have the knowledge within you. Remember, a lot of difficulty is added because we try to make arguments in English - a foreign language. Think about how much more confident you would be while making the same argument in your mother tongue.
You know good sir just keep it a secret don't tell them all that if they will try it they will be fulfilled just be fulfilled by yourself and after that I suppose you know enough.👍🌻
a robotics PhD that awesome can you tell me some interesting new directions robotics is going like out of factories and more like a vacuum robots integrations in day to day life like what is the next big thing in robotics which will be incorporated in our day to day life
@samrath your PhD is good man.. Keep the scientific temperament up.. Dont fall to these.. Goonies. Godman...
Gobar has bacteria... Seriously.. I didn't know this cuz my teachers throughout the school used to say that it shows anti bacterial qualities in the presence of sun and that's why most people use gobar to basically clean their houses.. Mostly in villages.....
I'm very confused right now... So if anyone has any knowledge regarding this plz clarify a lil bit for me... Feel free to teach me
Bro he has no fucking idea about things he is talking about.
Gaanv mein kaache gharo ko har mahine gobar aur taalab ki mitti ko milake leepa jata hai.
Baati aur choorma donon hi gobar se banne wali kor ya uple jo hote hain unke upar sek kar banaye hate hain.
Jo govardhanji ki baat ki hai uske liye gobar basti ke har ghar se ata hai aur dahi bhi. Dahi ko pet wali jagah par dala jata hai aur parikarma ke baad mein thoda sa Prasad ke Roop mein Grahan kiya jata hai
Uske baad mein Gaye ke bachde ke khur govardhanji mein gadaye Kate Hein.
@@martandgurjar4303 +1 i can also confirm this ,in my village in Uttrakhand similar procedure used.
Aur Rahi indians ke bahut zyada religious hone ki to Dharm(not religion) Bharat ke har vyakti mein racha basa hai
Mere history ke teacher ek badi acchi baat kaha karte the:-Jab Tak Bharat mein Sanatan Sanskriti hai tab tak Gai,Ganga aur Govind Bharat ki atma ka abhimn ang bane rahenge.
@@martandgurjar4303 vo gobar ko dry krte he na uske baad no bacteria. gobar is like sasta cement
The whole problem in believing God or spirituality arises when people start speaking nonsense about these things and give any argument to justify it
Yes quoting 1000s year old books in midst of an argument is very annoying.
@@notnavlookaway do you believe in any absurdity even though you understand?
@@parthsarthi2667 so what we are studying today in Psychology and philosophy etc after thousands years these things also become useless.. Jis Logic ko tum use kar ke 1000 years Purane Books ko useless bol rahe ho waise hi aaj se 1000 years baad jis Books philosophy ko tum bahut Great mante ho usse bhi koi tumhare jaisa chomu Bulshit bol dega so in short according to your childish logic the things which we are studying today it is actually a Bulshit which is declared after 1000 years... 😂😂
Kabhi chicha soch te ho bolne se pahale ki bol kya rahe ho...
And do you know wo 1000 saal purana Kitab aaj bhi kyu relevant hai kyu uss samaya bhi tum jaise cht¡ye the aur aaj bhi hai...
Toofan zalzala aate hi sbko bhgwan yaad aa jata h…
@@xxgreekgodxx3289 nope
#savesoil let's make it happen 🌱
We won't be able to do it because government is not working for it seriously they are totally destroyed.but yeah if a bit can happen it's better than nothing.
Yes let's make it happen💕
Let us make life roar in all possible ways✨ ~Sadhguru🧘♂️🌟💕
I think you're trying to mislead the audience with the title
How does it matter
@@theaditxys so you're saying it doesn't matter if a youtuber is misleading their audience?
@@murtazazaza it's a click bait. Are you new to RUclips or something?
@@digvijaysingh4585 assigning a term for it doesn't make it right🤦🏻♂️
@@murtazazaza What is wrong with that? These videoes should be reached to large audience right?
A random person who doesn't know about Prakhar or Science is dope will never click on these videoes.
Instead of looking on the severity of the problem of soil, they want to prove how smart they are by discussing about Sadhguru and wanted to get views out of it.
This is what overthinking and selfish mind does to you.
Please keep all your rational thinking in your pocket , if it cannot be used in any way to benefit the world. #savesoil
We were expecting this collab one day or the other.. Thanks for the insightful talk ❤️
I was just thinking about prakhar and pranoy to collab yesterday and here it is!!
It's good to see prakhar is doing so much collab and conversations ✨✨ keep doing the good work prakhar ✨✨
Pranav (science is dope) sees things through a microscope and only tries to absorb what he thinks is true and justified, he is so close minded which annoys me. we may not agree on all things but that doesn't mean u can throw vile tantrums like a butthurt. I always urge people to not believe everything blindly, listen to what both parties are saying and reach a conclusion using your own cognitive abilities, always be skeptical of yourself , you may not be true all the times just try to accept your shortcomings and try to correct them and grow to be a humble being.
please don't be like Pranav be openminded
But he considers himself most open minded
Ironically, it is people like Pranav that think of themselves as "rationalist" and "universalists" when their entire world-view is influenced by their tunnel vision.
@@rbsrasoi5692 Me too Consider myself better than Newton and Einstein combined without even interest so is it?👽
@@ofAwxen what tunnel vision u mean ? And thats argument from ignorance what u used by describing his view as close minded
At least tell me what close minded thing u found about him and if you're just asserting he is close minded without actually giving proper basis then you're simply using the fallacy "argument from ignorance"
No fap is essentially important if you want to quit porn. In my case after completing 10 days of noFap I am feeling more energetic and more confident, I am now more career oriented and ambitious then ever before. In the end it's all about your own perspective. I started it and I am seeing some good results...
Maturity is when you realize Atheism is also a belief system....
Indian dharmas have already had atheism based religions like buddhism and jainism.., i think you are talking about pro materialistic atheism..
Not believing in something is not believe ....but materialistic atheism is also harmful ..... Its a practise that will later exploit ....
😂 lol , yes I was also used to be thinking that i am an atheist but now i know who I am !👍 Atheist is nothing but just idea of believe in nothing but actually they believe in nothing , nothing in india means " Shiva " Shiva means voidness means "shunya" 0 , zero or nothing , so now I know Shiva !🙏🕉️
@@aumkartarkar2272 logical fallacy
@@rimonislam2809 😂 wow you must believe in that logical fallacy to call my comment a logical fallacy at the end !
This kid cannot destroy the Master✨
😂😂🙏 exactly, though he tried hard
@@avinashkeot7402 many idiots are trying brother 😂😂 but they will never be able to bcoz Sadhguru never clings to any belief systems as such😂 only what you have experienced has to be trusted, rest everything has to be doubted and seeked🧘♂️🌟💕
He is just a notorious student
Ye takla apne ko bahut bada rational aur scientific minded banta hai. Iski baaton se lagta hai ki Enstein bhi Ishse tution lene aata tha. Takla kahi ka.. Internet se thoda ulta sidha information kya le leta h ki apne ko Guru se bhi upar samajhne laga hai.
he destroyed him logically but logic is the last thing sad guru fans would like
idk why but pranav is only pointing out hindu godmen and christan slavery but why didnt he mention the most peacefull religion of the planet earth once i m talking about islam.and his reasons against sadhguru are just too weak man need to do some homework before going into the debate or you will represent youself as a propagandist nd i believe you are not,, it is just you dont like sadhguru which is acceptable but going all against a man who can dismantle you within seconds ,you really need strong arguements against him.
Visit his channel
Zakir Naik ka bhi bajaya hai barobar
What is diffrence between believing in god and not believing God both are same . No fact only belief
Wrong. The absence of the belief in something isn't a belief in itself, just as 'off' isn't a TV channel.
@@shashankgangavatiker7201 sorry, but there is different e b/w 2 lines .
1. I don't care if god exist or not
2. I don't believe there exist a god or I believe their is no god.
Second one is clearly a believer too, just that he / her doesn't believe in God.
@@TarunKumar-ef7vbNo, you are confusing rejection with refutation. There is a difference between saying -
1. "I don't believe God exists" and
2. " I believe God does not exist"
This is not just word play. The second statement is a belief in a positive claim (that God does not exist) which is required to meet its burden of proof by providing evidence to support the non-existence of God. The first statement supports no claim but is rather a dismissal of the claim "God exists" based on lack of evidence. No beliefs are being asserted here, is just that unjustified beliefs are being evaluated.
Ok so I had a friend in class 11 who used to say God doesn't exist and used to make fun of bhagwaan krishna by saying he had the real fun with gopiyaan(he was himself a hindu). Later in 12 he became so polarized he was literally verbally abusing munnawar Faruqui for doing that joke and said why always hindu gods are made fun of......
Indian Leftists and Anti-Hindu forces are responsible for redicalisation of Youth.
If you keep attacking a particular faith at some point they will retaliate.
Hinduism is not just not a religion. It's an identity as well.
India me sidha simple hisab hai. Logo ko koi probelm nhi hoti jab tak joke dusre k religion par ho. Mera dost aadhe ghante ka lecture dega k religion par joke nhi karna chaiye aur fir baithkar Lucifer dekhega.
@@digvijaysingh4585 indian left namuna hai. Par Liberal hamesha se har religion ka majak banate aa rahe. Ab west me sabse zyada joke christianity par bante hain kyuki waha k logo ko usse relate kar pate hain. Mujhe life of brian jaise movie samjh nhi aati kyuki mene christianity k stories nhi padi. So, jaha jo religion majority me hota hai, joke uspar zyada hote hain.
Munnawar faruqi was scandalizing deities in the name of Joke. It's insulting someone. Please try to understand the anti hindu propaganda and bashing. Just like you can't scandalize Courts, you cannot do that deities of our religion. There's a difference between joke and insult or soft abuse or sometimes abuse.
Science man just destroyed himself.
Great to see THE GUY getting recognition. So happy!!
Most of us thinks the practice we follow in the name of dharma is real Hindu dharm but they are totally wrong and does not have any knowledge of Dharm but if you just go through Ashtavakra Geeta or Upanishads (currently I am reading ashtavakra Geeta) they come to know how great great great The Hindu dharm is...
Brilliant comment. Upanishads, Bhagvad Gita, Ashtawakra Gita, these are gems that if understood change lives of its followers.
@@pulkitdhingra8351 have you understood them? Have read these books you mentioned?
And what makes you think that you know the correct meaning of dharma
@@romilmahant2971 There is no correct meaning of Dharma. Dharma is what you chose to make it about. Hinduism has always been about the all paths lead to the same goal way of life, no reason why we shouldn’t use that analogy while examining Dharma.
@@romilmahant2971 I have tried and they have changed my life in proportion of as much as I have understood them.
Religious symbols are there leaving the most prominent one... (Thumbnail)
That's the one which every activist and woke are afraid to even mention cuz that community can cancel anyone overnight
You know who am i talking about
Something to all the pro-science guys with a scientific touch, "Absence of proof is not necessarily proof of absence ". Being pro-science is no different than following religions, food for thought.
But its still isn't the proof of presense
@@cosmiclegend4181 So micro organisms didn't exist, before the discovery of microscope?
@@vijaysolanki6593 but any hypothesis of micro organism didn't existed then. If u are making any hypothesis then it should have evidence yes
@@vijaysolanki6593 They existed but you weren't talking about their existence either, which is the whole point!
@@vijaysolanki6593 The problem is the way this statement is used to promote quackery, just use this argument to justify any kind of bullshit hypothesis
Guest hasn't opened himself to other dimensions, he confined himself to modern science.
Saduru andha bhakts only have many dimensions...
What we don't have 😭
Please give me stuff to open other dimensions 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
@@investing_master
Scientism is religion
@@ToastRusk
Do deep meditation
@@G_Singh222 look where all the meditation got you to.
As a every writer or podcaster you have not taken a name of one religion. Because you know if you take name of their god you already know what is the situation you will face in future.
There is a idiom in gujarati
પોચુ ભાળે ને ત્યાં જ આંગળી મારે
Means you always poke those people only that you know they not going to hurt you at any level.
Tbh dude pranav has even made videos on Islamic clerics where he debunked Zakir naik's false claims. When it comes explicitly to scripture, he hasn't made any videos on Hinduism too because that just isn't his genre.
@@ritayanchaudhuri8516 Muslims don't take Zakir Naik seriously. Infact he is banned by many Muslim organisations. So no fatwa for speaking against Zakir . Pranav is smart so he cherry picked Zakir, doesn't dare speak on Moulvis or Islam. He knows the consequences.
Knowledged people who believe in God, do trust in false practices which're non-religious and simply influenced by some god-men or whatever.. understanding and bridging the gap between God truly depends on oneself... ❤️
Nice comment
That is if one exists
God-men is a term which media has propogated otherwise you pick up any guru who has shown path and transformed people claiming as God-Men you take sadhguru he is a guru a guru means one who dispells darkness where is GOD-MEN imply here pls be conscious while picking up words as it changes the trajectory and the meaning of what you say
@@siddharthsingh5886 I refer only to God-men.. not gurus
@@nagthelastboy7029 exactly there are only gurus the term GOD-MEN is given by the media the ones who claimed GOD-MEN are behind the bars
Science is dope is one of my favourite channels as he is one the few youtube channels that debunks pseudoscience and tries to educate people with scientific rationality... It was great to see you guys collab and make this podcast happen..Great content Prakhar 👍
But if we look from a broader perspective, it's insignificant. He's kinda making myth busters. People who follow those people he debunks, won't even search his channel and if they come across, they will disagree. Also science is dope some times wrong, watch his Vedic math video, it was utter bs. In Praveen mohan too he was misleading. And shark tank video was an attempt to get views. Personally there is nothing special what he's doing
@@sigmachadtrillioniare6372 Even if he's able to get 1 out of a 100 people to atleast increase their skepticism, I think it's a net positive
@@kaustubhprakash1273 people who are thinking a bit rationally automatically increase their skepticism at a point without any Richard Dawkins or Sam Harris. Their intelligence eventually leads them to a conclusions from conclusions. Which can be theism to athiesm, or athiesm to theism. This happens whole life, the more they think, research, observe the further they go and stronger their opinions become. Just like nearly everyone getting into science or philosophy becomes athiests, but people who are in the game long term, become agnostic and switch back to theism. And that's the point. One of the first steps of the millions in gaining wisdom is acknowledging things you can never know.
@@sigmachadtrillioniare6372 I think plenty of us have had the questioning God and atheism phase and returned back to theism. It’s just that something about the complexity and brilliance of the Universe makes you feel, in the heart of your hearts, that there is God. Maybe not as a father in heaven, but just as an entity, or even as the Universe itself.
@@thephilosopherwhojoked4249 absolutely, and not only that. I have many many reasons to turn back to theism. Hypocrisy in athiest arguments were also a reason. They claim to have “debunked” many of theist arguments for god, but all they do is make broad assumptions with zero mathematical and scientific backing themselves. And on internet oh god, they're all just making stupid sarcasm, and using repeated quotes from famous athiests. Also, my athiesm was based on Christian and islamic claims if God. When I actually read about daoism, budhism, Confuciusism, zen budhism, hinduism. My athiesm got struck. Their depiction of time was way better, an infinite cycle of life and dead through bodies of various species. No permanence was the only reason I belive in them. Because it's a well established undeniable fact, that nothing is permanent. Neither death, nor life neither pleasure nor suffering, the only permanent thing is the cycle itself, and inorder for this chaous to end, on shall attain Nirvana, also known as moksha
You have a logical human mind Prakhar while your guest is humanoid with AI. Life is not all about algorithms ....life would be much more happy and content when we know that Someone up there is taking care of us. We all are rebellious at some stage of our lives... against our religion ,our parents ,the society but when we come out of the phase ,we realize that they were right in some way.
@@bulldozer7399 pop culture ke blind followers hai ye log aur chale hai dusro pe sawal karne
+1 now this ia something
This is so true, I was against every thing you mentioned but my faith is restored and this time it’s rock solid. Really ancient India was way ahead in every sense. If we just eradicate all superstitious and malpractices then no one would be close to us in terms of culture richness.
@@jain_saiyam it’s like saying “agar Ramayan se sita Ko Nikal de, toh Raavan Ek Bahut Achha Aadmi Tha” Are bhai Sita Nahin hoti to Gita Hoti, Ravan toh wahi hai na.. and again if you remove Sita completely from Ramayana then it would be some other story…
No, it won't be .. tell the same thing that there is someone to take care of them who is so unfortunate and fill with misery not because of his own fault but because of some disaster like tell it to someone who lost everything in a earthquake or natural disaster....... You have to accept that we are tiny specs in this vivid universe and nature.. and we don't matter much .... Anything could happen at anytime...... And the unvierse and nature will keep going... Our elders especially Indian elders are load of crap that's why we don't have critical thinkers and philosophers like we used to have... This submission to authoritative arguements is bullshit.... If you are actually strong enough you have to accept the fact that what we are and start understanding things from there
For a WhatsApp scientist Science is always dope. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.This Pranav blocked me on his youtube channel for exposing him badly.😂😂SHAME ON YOU PRANAV, NOWHERE TO HIDE YOUR FACE.#SaveSoil
these people need subscribers just by mocking famous people's 😂
@@MkMk-rp1wb Yeah.People have obviously ignored him.Ask him how trees has he planted in his life criticizing Cauvery Calling?????Just busy mocking other people without any evidence.......#SaveSoil
@@vinayapansare644 expose him? Please I want to read your explanations
@@bhaveshtochabbra6853 Let's take #Savesoil movement:This idiot says that how riding a bike could save soil???But the fool doesn't know that by 2045,40 % lees food and by 2050 90% of our agricultural land will be UNCULTIVABLE!!!!!!!.Also he was criticising Cauvery Calling Project without doing proper research just baseless accusations so I just mentioned few facts and he blocked me.BTW 72 nations have already pledged to #SaveSoil movement and Govt of India recently allocated 19000 crores to revatalize 13 rivers of India based on Cauvery Calling success.#SaveSoil
Keep the good work coming ✨❣️
where is the part of destroying sadhguru
Prakhar bro , you should read "Behave, the biology of human behavior at our best and worst " by Dr. Robert Sapolsky
Prakhar looks like Vijay Deverakonda.
I've been watching Pranav from a while, and i really like his content
His content is a joke.
@@mangopudding5979 you too
@@denken7764 No Bro, you can see his biases clearly if you have the intent.
@@mangopudding5979 like u
@@yash-vk1cm na bro he have proofs....which pseudo science does not have...rather he mostly debunks public figure
I totally appreciate Pranab's scientific critical analysis of Sadhguru's talk on various topics science, but he should also highlight the various scientific studies done on the meditation techniques taught by Sadhguru which have impacted millions across the world and not simply disregard his immense contribution to the society.
He appreciates the good
He criticize the bad
Pls watch his content, It generally makes us proud of our country by using actual real stuff
@@lucky_lolI watched a video of him debunking the whole distance to Sun in Hanuman Chalisa. I checked his comment section and all of it was just a rave for atheists. They were outright mocking Hanuman Chalisa. And funny part is, he was hearting those comments too.
Now I watched another video done by project Shivoham and he also came into the same Conclusion. But he was more courteous and respectful. Not only that he later released videos highlighting the multiple knowledgeable aspects of Hanuman Chalisa.
If you want to watch true unbiased content regarding all of this, go watch Project Shivoham not this guy who is just a south Indian version of Dhruv Rathee.
Mahashivratri what? There is a day called national science day where you two who have 0 contribution to science get excited just like we spiritual people get excited on mahashivratri.
And what is your contribution for mahashivratri bro
@@kandaghatvalley181bro do you know how much economy, revolve around, how many beautiful architecture and temples made for it , do you know how many good quality music and song made for it , do you know how many people gathered like family for these special occassion in this fast running world where people who are literally social animals but don't have time to meet loved ones , do you know doing fast even in name of God helps your gut to be good , how can you be rational if you are not looking at every aspect of something which you are disscussing
@@Kaal3339 brother keep clam the economy you are talking about is not progressive and I do fast on shivratri and help in the temple when we have shivpuran in our village for 11 days but I don’t believe in your fake following for god in the name of science and economics you pick select science when you need to prove god or prove anything related to god and most of you guys have lost their own culture and tell others what religion is by reading some article on internet we have a cultural society in which I have not forgotten my culture but you guys have own religion doesn’t ask for anything it’s allows ours to question everything even the gods we believe in and follow it gives us the rite to find our own path but not to follow blindly these political parties and dhongi babas like most of the India follows know your own culture like village people do
Title is misleading. The quality and quantity of arguments, thoughts raised by Pranoy were pale compared to what Prakhar had to say and ask. (I come from a rationalist clan). Simply love the clarity of thought Prakhar has !
Now bring Sadhguru as well and hear his side as well. Don't play sides. Karni hai to dono side ki philosophy karo.
Aww someones offended
@@dem0_o14 lol. You don't even know me. If you did, you would know that I am such a big anti-Sadhguru. I just said this because I have Science is dope and Prakhar's videos and they just spew bullshit with 0 knowledge. If this guy really needs to speak on this topic, he needs to spend like 1-2 months with Abhijit Mitra actually going into the nuances of the topic or a good physicist or scientist (I mean, he has connections with that 30 under 30 scientist and IDK why doesn't he do like a detailed science stream with him. He can even pick anyone from stupid IIT and they will have more knowledge on the topics related to science). But he is just overconfident asshole in everything. he is selling 15k courses on crap material that a person can anyways learn if he/she puts in a little more effort. To lead a good daily life, we don't need so much philosophy. I have talked to him on discord also and he was like that everyone should think so deeply and I asked him what if we are not interested? and he had no answer. So, he is a fluke and does less research and speaks as if he knows everything and propagates his way of living as if it is the right way according to him and if someone, like Vedant, challenges it, he gets petty unknowingly. So, that is why. By saying someone is offended without understanding the context you just proved that you are a blind bhakt of your Prakhar Bhaiya.
He is just doing business of philosophy and selling tags rather than ideas and I don't know anyone like Shwetabh even talks to him.
bhai you should watch the other side of argument on the MYTH of sati...refer to Abhijit chavda or minakshi jain
The art of getting views by Prakhar Gupta
Prakhar looks so oversmart, it almost seemed that he's trying hard to look like an intellectual. Whereas Pranav is actually knowledgeable and is to the point.
awww really bengali / bangladeshi ??
Dude!! Excellent content
This guy is breath of fresh air man. Prakhar you're right, a significant change from the mid 2000s or early 2010s has been there but I do have hope for the future. Thanks again for bringing him to the show.
I am an agnostic but I found Acharya Prashant Advice very useful and profound.
Yes watch acharya prashant and project shivoham's recent video...Agnosticism , rationalism , atheism are also part of one of the 6 school of thoughts of vedas....So we cannot reject good parts of religion at all..It will make us slave of our natural instincts...Even Savarkar was an Hindu atheist...
@@adwaitvedant3297 savarkar literally justified consuming non-veg and said raping muslim women is fine (not throwing random stuff, check this out and you will be shocked). He added the prefix "hindu" cuz he wanted to form the hindu mahasabha and gain hindu support !
If one hasn't learned to be compassionate after studying vedas then Idk what has he even learnt from vedant lol
😂
Collab with Vivek aghnihotri
Ho gaya hai bohot pehele Kashmir files bhi discuss kiya tha ..pg Chanel pe hai ig
@@pleasemakethatface3579 ha patah hain bt Collab again bro , he is such a ittlectual
I don't think he is an intellectual
He is blinded with his political ideology he fails to see beyond that just check his Twitter
@@senjuhashiram_a idk about him a lot..but the podcast was good..got to know a lot of his experiences ..
Prakhar, please bring Shivam Shankar Singh and/or Anand V on your talkshow
The Art Of Conjuring Alternate Realities: How Information Warfare Shapes Your World
Raja Ram Mohan Roy was just a British agent sati was never part of Indian culture this was just British propaganda against India you should see Abhijit chavda video on this
Finally someone said this 😤
haa bhai... sab kuch british, mughal, aliens ne hi kiya hai.. ham toh doodh ke dhule the
yes bro Hindu all time nice person broo....he can't do nothing bro....before British no caste system bro....Mughal brought sati bro...Hindu society most progressive even 1000 year before...
@@RajaRam-xx1kp yes hindu ki baas itni gaalti thi ki woh baas united nhi tha varna ...... 😤 Jis tarah chandra Gupta maurya ne Alexander and selecus nicator ki band bajayithi ...... Usi tarah Mughal aur angrezo ki band bajate
Stop lying Phogat. Accept the mistakes done by your ancestors.
I have so many questions!
Normally what i understand from science is test and accept anything if it is true. But all the wrong theories(most of them in chemistry) were and are given by scientists itself. And another scientist comes and rectifies that this not true, my theory explains this concept better. And the world. But the same world accepted the previous scientist and gave appreciation(like Noble prize).
So should we accept these theories as evidence according you guys OR should everyone in the world start experimenting each and everything and then act according to their results?
Another doubt is that in the religious books(like Bhagwad Geeta, Bible, Quran) , they say that GOD is the reason behind all the creation and destruction of the universes, and scientists reject these theories, but till now i didn't get any answer that then how are the universes are created. I know most of the science knowledge guys tell some big bang theory or black hole theory or matter theory. My question is who created those matter/black hole etc.??
I have tons of doubts like these. If anyone is interested we can discuss these topics and I'll be ready to hear your point of view.
Kindly reply to my questions with EVIDENCE!!
You'd never know😏
>my question is who created those matter/black hole
And my question is who created the god? You'll probably say god doesn't need to be created or he created himself or he always existed, now why don't you apply this logic to matter? If god doesn't need a creator then why does matter need it?
Since your comment is respectful, lets have a good discussion :)
1. Yes you are right, science is about creating new theories and rectifying those. For an example take the newton's theory of gravity. The math works, but it is false and we have a new theory, given by einstein. But still newtonian mechanics works in most of the situations, and it's simpler than einstein's theory. It also has a ton of applications in the field of science.
Another example is the bohr model of atom. It doesn't work for any other atom other than hydrogen, and we never said its correct for all elements. Now we have the quantum model of atom, which does prove to be correct mathematically.
You know evidence based approach is the best for it. This talk doesnt really involve any concept that has only a mathematical proof or a really complex scientific concept.
2. Simply giving a placeholder(GOD) for something we dont know is not a correct approach to answer a question. You know since the time humans started thinking philosophically and scientifically, the need for a placeholder i.e. GOD started decreasing and decreasing, now its only the creation of universe. And you really wanna believe in a GOD placeholder for that question?
Now when we say god created the universe, then we immediately are driven to think how the god is created. If the answer is he always existed, then from a causality standpoint, it makes no sense at all. Then how or why did he create the universe at some nth second, and how could that happen if he existed forever?
3. Your question of who created the things that we see around, is a fun topic to talk about. You see ever since the universe began, things obeyed in a particular way, we can call them a set of universally obeyed laws. These laws together mixed up with events chaining created a series of other events, and it goes on. Thats how stars are created, that's how sun is created, thats how earth is created. And thats how we are and our brains are created, thats how everything we see around is created.
If you disagree with me feel free to reply, looking forward for more questions from you
1. The misconception that you have started out with is that theories are 'True' or 'False'- scientific theories are neither. They are simply the best possible descriptions about the observable universe supported by mountains of empirical evidence. Old theories are never 'proved false', it is just that new theories accommodate them as a part of a bigger picture to better explain new observations and to reconcile them with the pre-existing evidence. Unlike a previous answer suggests, Einstein didn't "prove Newton wrong"- Newton's law of gravitation is consistently accurate when dealing with non-relativistic frames of reference. Einstein simply expanded on Newton's work to include an additional set of observations which led outside of Newton's domain.
2. The idea behind God creating the universe is not a "theory", it is pure superstition. A necessary criteria for any scientific theory is that it must be supported by evidence, and there is zero evidence to support the existence of God.
3. Nobody knows how the universe came into existence, because nobody knows what happened before the big bang. This question itself may be non sensical because of time itself began at the moment of the big bang, you cannot ask what CAUSED the big bang because causality cannot exist without time...
Well to a certain extent, you're certainly correct about science. It's the nature of human inquiry and curiosity. I haven't done much research in terms of astrophysics, but as far as i know, the most feasible theory to explain the beginning of the universe of the big bang. However, instead of just accepting the big bang entirely, science still works on trying to think of more and different theories. However, most religions already justify it through scriptures, claiming it as evidence. Science never 'claimed', it 'proposed' it's ideas. Again, I'm not saying that I feel the big bang is a 100% accurate, confirmed theory, and I'm not sure what evidence is there for it.
However the ones who need to provide evidence are the ones who claim that the universe was created by a supreme, omniscient being who simply (and conveniently) exists beyond time and space. The evidence needs to be provided by those claiming these extraordinary ideas.
All i believe science does is reject this claim on the basis of the fact that there's no definitive proof of the existence of such a being, and nor does it provide any scope of improvement or criticism.
Anyways, hopefully we can reach a proper conclusion has to how the universe began. Hope you could get some insight. :)
I'm so happy to have found Science is Dope channel... I'll always thank Pranav for opening this channel
Science is Dope is a sham.
Science is dope and... science journey are my two most streamed channels on RUclips... hope you'll like it
@@wiredUP3 wtf science journey
If someone wants to fill his mind with gutter then i can say Science journey is best
@@wiredUP3 Nope Science journey is Fake buddhist cum ambedkarite channel.
@@trueRationalThinker ohh .... definitely his streams are really about gutters which have blinded the society ...
I think moralizing is a self-inflicted punishment. Example, someone trying to conform to strict beauty standards would think twice before eating a cake, and upon eating it, they would feel guilty for having committed the 'sin' of gluttony. We have internalized some moral norms that we use to inflict pain upon ourselves emotionally.
Also, moralism leads to an affirmation of the status quo. As are the present state of things, moralists would always question the use of any kind of violence done by the individual against property or another individual, while ignorantly refusing to acknowledge the systemic violence that kills and harms people on a daily basic.
It's better than not having any morals at all. Then you fall in nihilism and existential anxiety. Having morals is, the only option. But we can make it better by having the right morals.
@@SmarterWithRahul are you saying we should become naga 🤣
Agreed. Imagine a state wherein there are no rules or laws of morality ex: no capital punishment for murder or any sort of crime. And also everyone thinks freely(hypothetical) i.e they completely live in the present. Do u think we would have the same crime rate or more or less?
@@SmarterWithRahul Nihilism as an emotional state will always be there with of without moral structure since morality is abstract
@@Pseudosapien29 much more crime ratio
prqakhar first read our scriptures than talk about our gurus their is a difference between our gurs and the so called godmen cos they are western
Many are real gurus too.
@@pulkitdhingra8351 exactly bro ye Jo hai na so called mainstream gurus vo nahi hai guru bahut saare guru hai jo ekdum genuine hai and saying that these gurus have this that is wrong cos again generalising is wrong
This guy is far from being a "science" man. All of his content have just become an echo chamber for atheists to confirm their biases. Science in general came this far with relatively higher accuracy in its explanations because it accepted it could be wrong at times, which boosted its potential to discover and experiment on a higher degree. Science makes arguments with reliable hypothesis and backings that have years of research in them.
This guy is exactly opposite of what he says and advertises. All of his arguments contain "this isn't logical, this is psedoscience, this is bullshit" - He never puts an effort in his 10 min+ videos to explain any of his arguments with scientific backings (peer reviewed research papers, not some random article a google search away). Ironic that this guy calls his channel "science is dope" - more like "atheism echochamber is dope, yo dawg".
All of the guys he criticises deserve legit criticism, but he is the last person who should be considered competent to do so.
💯💯💯
Ever read the Tridosha principles Ayurveda which is it's foundation. It is a pseudoscientific belief with absolutely No empirical evidence to support it & lots of things written in Charak & Sushrut Samhita are just Factually incorrect. Ayurveda has contributions in the field of medicine by being pioneer of many Medical & surgical interventions. But that's not the excuse to blindly accept wherever is written in the scriptures without critical evaluation.
Totally agree. I respect atheist as they question even science but Pranav is a believer of science what an anthesis. Pure unadulterated pseudo intellectual is what he is.
What a coincidence!I really love watching both of you.I consume both of your content every day on RUclips and today here we are.
what's your favourite Nirvana song?
@@krszkkn I think it is "in bloom" I just sticked to never mind album and listening to that in a loop.What's your fav?
@@sharankurada3562 Polly
@@sharankurada3562 have you listened to papercuts ?
God bless you
Who's this guy pranav...just loved hearing him❤❤
bruh thumbnail dekh ke lgta kisi ne maarli prakhar ki
😂😂😂😂🤣🤣
Zyzz is my favourite i start doing gym after watching him
@@61eo86 HAHA XD
@@61eo86 great bro , zyzz will be proud for sure
Expected it from a Mallu guy. We should ask why he came to Bangalore to study and work instead of Kerala..
He is not a ba ba black sheep following godman and their pseudoscience like you
I know he is not the cup of cofee for an andhbhakt like you
Ye kya bakchodi hai? He is an Indian vo koi bhi state m jaa sakta hai.
i love that guy 🤩 i wish people could be a little more like that in our country
Please differentiate between the ideology/ tenets of religion and that of it’s followers. In this regard , in the interest of fairness , if you read the Quran you will find your kind of logic- but you are skeptical without reading it - isn’t that unreasonable ?
A much awaited podcast love you both ❤❤
This guy is a hidden gem.
Amazing podcast, Great job
Time cord - 30:10
Same Like you ,alws pick choose the religion by your convenience/bias/ narrative or m b the hatred..like not taking ones on the bad thing of Islamic atrocities but selectively cherry picking frm Hindu religion mostly nd Christianity sometimes.. these only define your nature of Baseness from fear towards one community of society … it occurs m b cz of your childhood connection to the state “Kerala” .. cz its a combination of communism+with Islamic over influence in ur nearby society nd from the past experience it alws makes(communism + Islamic XYZ) a deadly combination of Hindu + cultural hatred …
they understand if they will criticize the other religion their head will be chopped off and they will not be able to have dope science talks with each other without head
Fabulous discussion
Have a conversation with Om swami
Prakhar got exposed,like just did what Pranav said. Just quoting rationality absolutely wrong,passion has nothing to do with it. We have facts and data and we just look in it. Come on Prakhar our guy isn't gonna fall for word play.
we??/ whats we"??? and u have facts and data for what??
The thing is India is one the most religious nations on earth. Cow is sacred yet it's the place with worst health conditions for cows and largest beef exporter in the world. And the poor is still neglected, and prosperity is still slow.
Meanwhile, the west is developed, introducing to the world, Hyperloop, electric cars, internet, medicine vaccine, smartphones etc. India still stays prideful on inventing 0 thousands of years ago.
Dear India, religion isn't bad but please balance it with some reason - don't be too obsessed.