Rudyard Lynch: This Is How a Second Civil War Will Start
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 фев 2025
- Rudyard Lynch, host of “WhatIfAltHist” on RUclips, explains why he believes that the United States is on the verge of a second civil war. Drawing on economic and social patterns from history, Rudyard highlights key factors that have created a perfect storm of potential triggers for unrest in America. While many envision a civil war as chaotic and all-encompassing-and therefore dismiss the possibility as too far-fetched-he paints a subtler picture of what this conflict would look like, with everyday life continuing amid a fraying social fabric.
Check out the full episode this clip was featured in here: • Rudyard Lynch on Datin...
Subscribe and ring the notification bell so you don’t miss a single video!
Follow Dad Saves America on Substack: dadsavesameric...
Subscribe to the podcast: dadsavesameric...
Make a tax-deductible donation to Dad Saves America: secure.anedot....
Follow Rudyard on X (formerly Twitter): x.com/whatifal...
Check out Rudyard’s RUclips channel: / whatifalthist
_____________________________________
Our Website: www.dadsavesam...
_____________________________________
Dad Saves America explores the philosophies and practical steps we need to raise capable, curious, independent adults ready to thrive in a virtuous free society... and want to keep it that way.
We’ve had many experts in the studio, including Jonathan Haidt, Dr. Drew Pinsky, Troy Kotsur, John Mackey, Ben Askren, and Adam Carolla.
#civilwar #history #election2024
If you like what you see and want to stay up to date with Dad Saves America, please subscribe here on RUclips or over on Substack, where you can find weekly articles and the audio version of the podcast, with more to come in the near future!
www.dadsavesamerica.com
Shot in the dark here.
Rudyard is around my kids' age. I'm genuinely concerned about him. Recently, like today, I learned that he experienced some sort of "thing" last month, and as far as I can tell has kind of fallen off the radar. I sincerely hope he has someone in his life supporting him.
He's done the rounds with various podcasters, and yours was one of the more recent ones I watched. I'm a nobody and don't know him, but you are someone with some grey hair, sorry wisdom who has at least talked to him recently. Perhaps you could contact him and see if he's okay, if he needs help, maybe give him some advice and encouragement to get it. --like I said, its a shot in the dark.
It's hard to start a Civil War with people who check their phones every 30 seconds and think the electricity going out for one hour is a major tragedy.
Or you start one with information that was hidden forum them. See the printing press and the Protestant Reformation and the wars that came from them.
Or you get something like the 30 Years War coming from the printing press and the Protestant Reformation. You hide things from people, and they find out, God help you.
Or you get something like the 30 Years War coming from the printing press and the Protestant Reformation. You hide things from people, and they find out, God help you.
Like the printing press? The ruling class has been hiding a lot from us. This is like the Protestant Reformation and the 30 Years War. Stop thinking of 1861-1865.
But if the power stays off for two or three weeks… People will turn on each other really quick.
I never put a time on it but in the 2010s, I started worrying that we had lost any national consensus. I kept thinking with no shared values, or historical narrative "the center can not hold."
Looking at the first Trump presidency, he was pretty centrist in his policies. Yet he is seen as an extremist. Because there is no center anymore, kind of by definition. If you agree with anything Trump says, you are in one camp. If you by definition disagree with everything he says , you're in the other camp.
Man, I had that feeling in the mid 90's when I moved from a conservative area to a state run by libs. It felt like a different country.
National consensus was being fought over in the 1960s. But after all that time has the narative so separated from reality those pushing the narative have finally lost credibility? Do I now believe these two more than I did Walter Cronkite? (TBH I did not believe him all that much anyway) The USA is very different in that most of it's wars have not been fought anywhere near it so have been rather separate affairs, other than the random family member killed or wounded.
This is what happens in Alzheimer's patients (they get lost in the narrative).
There hasn’t been national consensus since constitutional convention of 1787
A moral government is essential to have democracy
Our government is designed to be a constitutional republic, I stopped in here because of this guys YT shorts illustrating that fact.
AIPAC would argue that
You should never expect a moral government. People who seek power and wealth are less likely to be moral. The government needs to live in fear of a moral people. That has been what the fight over 'woke' and the other efforts to remove morality from the people.
Whose morals is the issue.
And a good moral republic must have a good moral people
Civil Unrest - ok; Civil War? - I’m sorry but that’s not happening
Yeah sometimes they do this thing like, “well people will be killing each other over politics all around the country.” That’s just civil unrest. Bad, yes. Civil war, no. I certainly hope it doesn’t happen but I’d need to see large groups of soldiers killing each other to be a civil war. The Troubles in Ireland were horrible but even that is civil unrest to my mind. Hard to imagine something worse than that happening by April.
Exactly. Modern humans are too pacified
@@josec.6394not that, moreso standard of living is high even if certain things are now unaffordable, if food becomes unaffordable then we’d be talking civil war of some sort
@@burntxela1258 True that. Humans will go tiger under certain circumstances. It would just take a lot.
@@burntxela1258 ok we’re not anywhere near that point yet. At least not where I live in USA.
Mens punching power is 162% greater than womens.
That seems like a low average...
Not if I have a robot arm, bicth
Like a girly man and a strong woman? I would imagine closer to 400%
@@teslabot5650 Yeah I am fat and out of shape and I can still dead lift 200 lbs... most woman I see having issues with even half that.
I imagine threat of no sex would lower punching power...
Actually, Alex Jones has been correct on nearly EVERYTHING he has claimed, with SOME EXCEPTIONS big and small
To dismiss him in that way shows me not only that you aren't paying attention, but you won't admit when you're PROVEN wrong, and therefore your credibility is lacking.
agree, immediately skeptical of this guy if he thinks alex is just schizo
Exactly! Alex trying to save world and this guy shit on himself by disrespecting him! Let’s see?
dismissing him as a kook just shows how low IQ both these idiots in the video are
This.
No he hasn't 😂
It's always of interest hear Rudyard's observations, the cost of living during the great Depression was in fact quite low, having said that, there was no currency/money regardless of the low cost. The depression inflicted extreme degradation into the lives of millions of people not only in America but around the northern hemisphere. Life is not a systematic mechanical equation, cycle and pattern prophets are more wrong than right.
Alex Jones called 9/11 months before it happened. 🤷🏼♂️
He also told parents that lost children to a mass shooter that it was staged…he is clearly a disciple of Satan which makes you one by proxy. Jesus sees through your false idols and judgement is coming
No he didn't.
@ July 25th 2001
@@Liam-w4h4w he did - the video is easily found lol
& the Vaxscam & Dont get me started on Climate Change scam .
I usually like your guests, but this one is an obnoxious know-it-all who sounds like a walking Reddit post.
"I use a combination of intuition and empiricism." That's called judgement, and it's pretty much universally how people make predictions. It's not special.
Please go back to having people with actual substantial experience and justified intuition on your show, not little kids with a doomsday fetish.
haha "like a reddit post". Thats very true, this guy is just spouting nonsense.
Amen to what you said.
you definitely don't know who you're talking about 😂
Hey bud, watch how you talk about the chuds. Chuds are back in control now.
No. Most people don’t use empiricism.
I suggest if you are a academic middle class office working male. Well I would watch my mouth around working class males. Shaming rallying and gossiping is a bish tactic.
He developed his theory with empirical and "intuitive" clues. This guy doesn't have the intuition to pour piss out of a boot.
You did a really job at ignoring all the historical parallels he gave. A REALLY good job.
As soon as he said “model”…..
I’m out.
This guy is all over suggesting this war, but no one in the real world is suggesting this (im in michigan). Maybe this is how he pushes for it, and puts it into the minds of the vulnerable.
When he is proven wrong, people need to understand why he pushed it...
I left his channel, and RUclips now suggest this ... pushing more deception
www.google.com/search?q=unrest+after+election&oq=unrest+&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqDQgBEAAYgwEYsQMYgAQyBggAEEUYOTINCAEQABiDARixAxiABDIGCAIQABgDMgYIAxAAGAMyDQgEEAAYgwEYsQMYgAQyEAgFEAAYgwEYsQMYgAQYigUyCggGEC4Y1AIYgAQyEAgHEAAYgwEYsQMYgAQYigUyBwgIEAAYgAQyBwgJEAAYgAQyEAgKEAAYgwEYsQMYgAQYigUyCggLEAAYsQMYgAQyBwgMEAAYgAQyBwgNEC4YgAQyEAgOEAAYgwEYsQMYgAQYigXSAQg1MDY3ajBqOagCALACAQ&client=ms-android-cricket-us-rvc3&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
@ He’s not “pushing” anything. You did a great job at ignoring all the reasons he gave for believing this will happen. He’s using historical models to try and predict the future. Just because you don’t agree doesn’t mean he’s trying to brainwash people into committing atrocities 😂 Fucking people can’t handle hearing anything that you disagree with.
Remember the 5th of November
Trump won both the popular and Electoral College votes. No post-election drama. Anyone invested in the S&P is having a great November 5 and 6th!
The MAGA Party treason and plot...
2024 Super Tuesday election, or Gunpowder Treason and Plot, or both? 😂
@willywonka4340 Interestingly, both.
Remember your white
This Guy doesn't know USA History, But his Prediction might occur end of 2025!😂😂😂😂
Las Vegas.
New Orleans.
Jan 1st, 2025.
Work 80 plus hrs per pay period! Haven’t payed a bill on time or had three meals a day in nearly 7 yrs!!!!
I appreciate these conversations. Thanks.
Did he say he was 11 when Obama was president. That explains alot what has he been through. Sometimes you have to be in the trenches to see something coming.
idk how it’s going to end, but i think SOMETHING is coming, I have a feeling in my gut, it’s like we’re in the calm before the storm
THIS POST DATE IS NOT AGING WELL
Give it time.
@@genx7006 Update: 😃
Did this guy ever even read 1984 or Brave New World?
He has
he is extremely well read, of course
On Election Day too dude, it takes guts 😭
Saying Alex being right over and over for over 30 years if verbal diarrhea really discredits you
This guy was terrible...he was brought on to talk about another civil war and it was like pulling teeth to get him to really say anything of substance. When you got to the all women are cowards part, I turned it off...please don't bring this guy back.
Yea when he said that about women it made me realize he may be well read but he has very little life experience
I havent watched it all, but this guy recently posted like a 10+ hour video thing where he claims Thor is posessing him to deliver messages.
He is not to be taken seriously.
living is but 1 problem, and not the biggest. The Catcher In The Rye describes a situation where youth has no idea where to find MEANING in their lives, and it’s gotten worse with recent generations. That’s why we see them bandwagoning on any case, despite the nonsense of it. when you have a bunch of youth with no meaning, then you have a powder keg ready to explode, even if only for a purpose and change from meaninglessness. They blame society, and rightfully so.
Most of the points mentioned were not unique to the US but global. Canada has having a major real estate crisis right now and Japan's debt to GDP ratio is trouble (263% as of 2023). What makes the US situation all that different?
After seeing Trumps appontments, Civil war is now a possibility.
Two of my favorite internet philosophic thinkers together. So much wisdom to absorb. Thank you for this video!
Rudyard Lynch doesn't have a clue what he's babbling about. Zero actual credentials. Why would you bother listening to him?
Lost me on this episode once I heard Alex Jones disregarded... Sad to see people tip toe around the UNs 17 boxes and pretend that UN policy isn't behind all of this.
You mean the guy who's in the middle of having his ass reamed out for repeatedly and extendedly lying about the murder of a few dozen schoolchildren?
History can’t predict the future
Yes it can just broadly
Their are plenty of patterns to make decent educated guesses for predictions for the future. Future might be unknown but knowing and understanding the past is best idea for making predictions for the future. Without understanding the past you have no objective idea of how to make predictions in the first place
But it does help. History is the closest thing to the future, that we have information about.
@@craizytvboomb7779 that is true history doesn't repeat but it rhymes a lot and has pattern that exists
History doesn't predict the future, it determines it.
I believe that once many people realize they were lied to by Trump, and life here gets worse, not better, then sentiments will change. So, on one side will be those who regret their choice and really want the country back, and those who continue to support Trump.
Prior to the election I would have agreed with Rudyard but seeing how the left has reacted so far makes me think that this outcome is not as likely as it once was.
I was struck by the guest's use of the phrase "...I've studied..." He did so to lend credibility to his position. HOWEVER, I found his analysis interesting, but incredibly flawed. His analysis relied on pattern analysis based on selection of key indicators. This type of analysis relies on the congruency of key indicators from situation to situation. This is a shallow analysis because it does not examine core/root causes of conflict, but sometimes key indicators is all you have, the rest of the root causal data is lost to history because historians failed to understand its significance. I research brain architecture and the biological, evolutionary, and structure of emotions. This DNA programming resides in all humans and operates the same regardless of language or society and controls all human behavior. This guest's analysis failed to relate to the necessary excitement of neurological pathways needed for conflict to occur. There are two similar neurological pathways that produce "conflict" but have two distinct manifestations. Both pathways concern competition for scarce resources. One is an intra-tribal competition and the other is an extra-tribal competition. Liberals favor collectivism; conservatives favor individual action; both are problem-solving algorithms embedded in our species' DNA. Societal rules - laws, regulations, societal norms, etc.- apply to those with whom we compete within our tribe. Societal norms, laws, rules, etc., do not apply to competition with other tribes. They're not of our tribe, therefore they do not get the benefit of our tribal rules. For example, a track meet between schools - a competition within a tribe - does not allow the stabbing of the person in the next lane as a way of competitive advantage. Stabbing tribal members is contra to tribal laws and norms. However, this would be permissible, and even desirable if you were at war with the other tribe. Point is, Liberals define their tribe as anyone who is a Democrat. Republicans define their tribe as anyone who is an American, which includes liberals. So there are two divergent means of completion occurring here. This is why liberals use violence in the form of words in what they call Republicans -'Trump is Hitler'. Republicans compete but use societal norms in their treatment of Liberals. This is why historically violence always originates with liberalism - because it narrowly defines their collective, who is tribal and who is not tribal; and why conservatives will go to great lengths to point out extra-tribal competitions to justify violence and war This is why Trump had two assassination attempts - because he was a "...threat to our democracy..." a veiled reference to liberals version of democracy, and was external the liberal's tribe; and why Republicans go to war for oil, a competition for a scarce resource with another tribe. This guest's analysis would benefit from the inclusion of this published science in his analysis. Maybe then, he could produce a more causal model from his studies rather than pattern analysis which tends to be far less accurate.
This was informative. Thank you. Though when I think of civil war it's based on the premise of class divide. When it becomes so unaffordable to live the working poor lash out against the resource privelaged. I'd like your thoughts on a, French revolution esque, civil war scenario.
@@qs6706 Your points reside within the model I explain. Competition for scare resources, in your scenario, is food. People can redefine their tribes - it can be a fluid process. In order to kill for food, all one has to do is say, me, I myself tribe, is more important than you, and I can use any means to take what you want. Now to be sure, there can be other neural circuits and cognitive algorithms involved in conflicts, but human behavior is highly predictable (under my current model is 100% accurate across 98% of the human population) in how humans will generate all human behaviors. Please note I said how they will process and produce human behavior, not what they will do. The example I like to use is tax software like TurboTax. Tax laws and form, and their accompany calculations are the same in every copy of TurboTax, yet nobody gets the same tax return. Why? Because even though they all use the same software, the inputs into that software are all unique and thus produce individualized tax return outcomes. I model the DNA encode software of biological brains which is entirely controlled by emotions. So civil wars occur when different tribes/factions arise and compete with other tribes/factions for scarce resources.
@@scottsyverson4260 Would you say that today's technological world has made it possible to potentially eliminate scarcity within our lifetime?
@qs6706 The French and Russian revolutions were middle class- the poor are too busy eking out a living to have time to rebel. It's middle class people losing status are the ones who get angry.
@@Robert_Douglass No. You have to separate production from distribution. Production can be scaled to meet needs; however, distribution can never be met because getting goods to where they're needed at the time they're needed requires the ability to foretell the future. Okay, that's the practical side, now examine the human factor. There are people who will always benefit from creating scarcity, in particular if they control the item. So beyond the information problem in market forecasting and humans' DNA behaviors to create certainty in their environment by creating shortages of products to create demand, we can never solve this problem. This is why communism's centrally planned economies will always fail. And, why free markets will never be perfect, but the will always be the most efficient means of distribution.
yet remember, 65 percent of the population lived on the farm and were self sufficient during the great depression.. the ones in the cities and working in factories had the most difficulties and those supporting the factories. if that were to happen now or in the future. not good.
Never underestimate the power of stupidity and greed.
A second civil war in the US would be much different than the first. It wouldn't the north vs. the south. There would be small wars scattered all over the country. Like a lot of Hatfield's and McCoy's style feuds. Difference would be some from one side would join with the other side like happened in the first civil war.
When is the war going to start. Did the war ever stop I can't tell
The guy is obviously smart and well read and speaks confidently and for enough people that's all they need.
One side has the military, vets, police, hunters and gun owners. The other side has the theys, thems, climate nuts and rainbow people. 😂
😂😂😂
That's what Republicans thought last time and got cooked because of it
I disagree. There are tons of leftist gun owners, the military and police would most certainly be with the left and you can't forget gang members who would most certainly be with the left as well. The left isn't as filled with they/thems as much as you think, it's just that the internet makes so much fun of SJWs that we think that's all they offer.
Armed rainbow people.
@@rudytreyRepublicans won the last civil war...
The Great Depression: "Besides the unemployment ... it was super cheap to have a family". WTF?
I had a dream about the 4th temple... The only way to discover its layout was to maintain plausible deniability and act like i knew exactly where I was going when I had absolutely no clue. The cameras and staff were watching and would've escorted me out had I not did that. 😂
-A cheating girlfriend would maintain plausible deniability by lulling you into a false sense of security and acting as if she isn't your enemy in your face, but behind your back she is.
-If your wife left home and took your children, an enemy would bring theirs around to plausibly deniably rub it in.
-The Pepsi factories that closed suddenly maintained plausible deniability until the abrupt closures.
-Employers that want to get rid of certain employees would set them up for failure plausibly deniably to make them look incompetent or have other employees gossip and give them a hard time (plausible deniable work place harassment) hoping the environment is so toxic they leave voluntarily.
There are many different ways to find it and just not enough time to explain it all.
This guy's voice is that meme of "Awctually" He even has the teeth 😂😂😂😂
The thing is if it ever came to a civil war 1 side has Americans the other side has Disney it wouldn't be more than a day of cleaning house
Seems like a given but the truth is that the left has gangs that sympathize with them. It would be a drawn out process best case scenario. Refer to the Northern Ireland troubles. People self segregate far before the opening salvo is fired. There may never be an opening salvo and small acts of terror will be the way the war is fought.
Funny. That is what they said in April 1861. Ha, ha, ha.
It seems that new terminology needs to be developed for these patterns, "Cival war" puts an idea in my head that seems different then what he is explain8ng. Good clip!
As I watch this video on election night. I see how polarized America has become. Even though the majority of people realize how bad and how incompetent Kamala is as a leader. The race is still close. Because we have people who will vote for their party regardless of how bad their candidate may be. This really is developing into a case where the only remedy to this polarization is separation. The only thing that remains to be seen is how violent the separation will be.
Never thought I hear the 30yrs war being compared to marvel smash lmfao
Excellent video! I don’t think “modern day philosophers” don’t account for the general apathy of the public-authors and influencers are motivated people- often ginned up over their own ideas and beliefs - surrounded by like-minded followers-unfortunately, they never look outside of their own echo chamber to see the rest of the world- these modern philosophers believe they can predict the future but they can’t even predict the weather
Re; women and plausible deniability, women on the whole hate confrontation bc they value social harmony with others more. Women define their lives by there relationships. men by their accomplishments.
It’s starting…Jan 1st 2025.
on inflation, correlation does not equal causation. there are so many variables it is impossible to predict with accuracy. He doesn’t understand that the United States has more flexibility on this issue than the “past” because the dollar is the reserve currency of the world. it is important because it means we borrow and pay in our own currency that we control.
No one knows when or if the dollar will use its reserve currency status. but there has to be alternative. The British pound was reserve currency for the world prior to WW1 and it was replaced by the dollar by the time the war ended. But you cannot name a single currency, or any list of currencies today that will stack up to replace the dollar. There is NOTHING. It may not be that way always, but you need another country to develop. China would be an alternative if the CCP were toppled and replaced with democratic republic and the rule of law. But the CCP makes the rembi a joke. No one is dying to hold rembis. If the CCP did not artifically support the rembi it would vanish in to oblivion.
This guy’s kind of an idiot. Who the hell compares WW2 to marvel smash.
Basic food is not a scarce resource in the west as it was before the green revolution and no longer a driving force to fight for survival. Modern farming prevents one of the main motivating factors for war.
Oh, nice. A watered-down, aged, knock-off Tim Pool-lite RUclipsr.. Even talks and sounds like him.
So, where are we now?
Kid, you play too much D&D
14:28 honestly that's kind of a reason why I moved to Texas too 😂😂
I already liked Lynch's channel, but the plausible deniability tangent ratcheted up my respect. Describes a socio / political reality well enough that many can see how revealing of an indicator it is of deception & motive.
People are upset, yes. However, who would actually support with money a violent struggle? For what?
Whatalthist is a incel. Smart, but an incel nonetheless.
he is also completely and utterly insane. he uploaded a 8 hour video rambling on and on about how Odin sent him to save the west and some other schizophrenic nonsense. he deleted it but I think you can still find the thing.
And the US military. It is not rich people that join the Army
He's got balls making such specific predictions but he's never right lol
Rudyard is very interesting, but the problem I have listening to him is that his area of study requires so many inputs. When he explains his position, he has to fill in so much background info and goes off on so many tangents, I lost track of the discussion.
Budget = Taxation. Taxation will be the cause.
Focus on your point stay on target
WELL STATED...seemed to be scattering all over the place FRUSTRATING TO FOLLOW
If you look at Alex Garland's Civil War movie and the basic premise of military and civilian factions teaming up to eliminate a rogue president... I wonder if we're in line for something like that with a loony president with fascist tendencies about to take office in a couple of months
interesting interview
*_Again, if you Fear God more than you fear the radicals on your own side,_* then you are less likely to help escalate tensions into a Civil War.
😎♥✝🇺🇸💯
"And this is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent" (John 17:3, ESV).
Lmao I swear to God he IS his Dad. They look exactly alike but one is a bit older.
the simpsons have proven to be more accurate than alex jones
I respect whatif alot and think he is smart however americans by and large are to well off to start a civil war , we are to wealthy and rich to have one
I thought the same thing but you need a certain amount of wealth and freedom to support dissent. If you can't feed yourself, you can't fight. You need enough freedom to see it being taken away while still providing enough to allow you to fight. Add that to the age of marriage and the feeling of no way out of the situation and you're getting close to the right conditions. I don't think we're there yet, but we're getting close. And what's even scarier is there's no where to run. Almost every country is at this point
Doesn’t take long for it all to go. Look at Europe.
People said the same thing before WW1 and probably before the American civil war and French revolution. Although hopefully trump has a decent plan on how to lower the price of groceries and necessities and the Democrats finally calm down on pushing division
Just found this channel. Whatifstalist (spelling?) is a good mind. He's one of my "knives in the dirt"
I dont know if you can trust a kid that claims to be a agent of Odin and went a a over 10 hour rant on drugs this kid needs help
A model? you have to be kidding. models are creations. they don’t predict the future.
This guy earned my respect by not holding back and just being honest
Even though he's not an actual historian?
Yow haven't watched it yet bet it's gonna be a banger enjoy life and VOTE❤🎉🎉🎉
As long as there’s internet porn, there will be no civil war.
Electricity/internet being out for an extended period of time would change this.
@@bobcobb158 true
I always thought the most realistic portrayal of how a current day american Civil War might go was Euel Arden’s novel, Down Here in the Warmth. Great book. Militia on the streets of NYC. Very controversial. Amazon banned it for a while but its back. Its quite a triggering book but really turns out to be somewhat enlightening, if that makes any sense.
Who paid you?
His point about feminism being a cover for not being able to afford to have families is nonsense. It’s more cost effective to have a two person household. Kids are sticky and expensive plus pregnancy is very hard on your body. Next is the interesting pool of “eligible” partners being unappealing at times. Sometimes it’s easier to be single and eat ramen. God forbid women consider what THEY want instead of living for those around them or surrendering to societal pressures. It’s almost like when you give people choice you get a lot of varied outcomes.
In the 1930s, the average US household spent up to 25% of their disposable income on food. In 2023, the average US consumer spent 11.2% of their disposable income on food.
now do housing
Also not to ignore is the fact that never before has America been in this situation where it’s doomsday for America irrespective who wins the election s both candidates are agenda driven and fail to evaluate the reality if the fact facing America’s future for return to prosperity.
I disagree entirely with this guy I don't think we're anywhere near close to a civil war. The last civil war we had was because of political and social issues not because of economic issues. Americans traditionally can tolerate quite a few economic problems before they become severely irritated but in the end they're not going to sit there and start a revolution because of economics. Using the rest of the world as an example for us not exactly the best. Play we're not the rest of the world, are also if you're not from the US traditionally then of course you're not going to understand us. You keep using foreign examples to try to prove your point. We're not the English we're not the Germans we're not the Russians we're not the people in Africa we're not the Asians we are Americans. We are completely different from the rest of the world if we have a civil war it's going to be because of political issues not because of economic ones
11:06 giving you the side eye
The minute I hear "verbal diarrhea ", about AJ....
Intuition & empiricism are the opposite of one another, you silly rabbits! They, at best, cancel each other out.
Hate to be the one to break this to you, Rudyard, but although your knowledge of big history is impressive, you are NOT more well-read than Alex Jones in general and you’re knowledge of contemporary history absolutely pales in comparison to Alex Jones’. This is why he gets things right. Don’t let arrogance prejudice your viewpoints.
Once this kid said he was 11 in 2012 I stopped listening lol
According to the 'Fourth Turning " model we are due for a large near world involving conflict.
This, ladies and gentlemen is how a college kid reasons. So much talk about little factoids that he “learned” or “studied”. He can’t get to the point or keep his train of thought. This is what we call an IYI.
His prediction about the election was dead wrong!
FORGET and DENIAL
No on feminism. Not in the least. Maybe put yourself in the shoes of women as if you can imagine yourself being born as one. So many of us are not interested in being a slave to man and kids. So we want the same things men want. An independent life.
You are free to be independent. But your statement “being a slave to man and kid” shows your mental frame, and it falsehood. When independent women vote to expand societal benefits that statistically they benefit from in majority, its funding will be in unequal part taxed by government from men. Ironically “enslaving” men to your benefit. Simply put, you are not independent, no one person is. You are simply avoiding the natural dependency that is built into male/female relationships and fulfilling your “needs” with social programs. While men and population numbers suffer the outcomes. Once population diminishes enough, ALL will suffer the outcomes.
I'm not saying it can't still happen, but putting negativity out into the universe via RUclips doesn't help things. It can become a self-fulfilling prophecy if you don't stop talking about it. It's time for this country to HEAL, so my advice is to cut the shit.
Their has to be signs of healing to be optimistic. We literally just had a mainstream Hollywood movie about the same topic and concept this year so the topic is already their
Did Tim Pool get hair plugs? Lol. #CivilWar
"Obama created wokeness". How? Before that, what is wokeness?
There hasn’t been deflation since ever to my knowledge. Our inflation today is on top of every year previously. Not to mention wage stagnation since the 1980s
Rudyard Lynch is not a real historian. You might as well just interview some random guy at a bus stop.
Budget is back to #1 now I guess.
So what will this prophet say if one side wins majority power in all branches of the federal government?
Shortly…