That Qatari F-15 performance starting at 42:30 was some of the BEST flying of that aircraft I've ever seen! Man, I wish I was there to see it. I was stationed at Lakenheath in the late 80's-early 90's and have seen a LOT of airshows (especially Mildenhall's AirFete) but I regret not seeing those guys!
@@airshowvision Psst, tell us, what do the F-35 have available to them to detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR? LOL... Keep it quite, as they have absolutely nothing. Hahaha
@@airshowvision Claiming the F-16 would be a game changer in Ukraine, must be one of the dumbest things anyone could claim. What will they be? Game changer log number: 869? LMAO! Seriously, though, just what could the F-16 achieve in Ukrainian airspace, today? Or in fact, how long could an F-16 survive in Ukrainian airspace, more to the point? I'd have to estimate the F-16, would have a combat life expectancy, of less than 30 minutes over Ukraine, (and that's extremely generous). You only need to understand what it would be facing? Regardless, that we already know the F-16 can't survive against the S-300 anti-air defences, it would then need to survive against, for example, a SU-35E? So, how could it survive, is the only real question that matters? It's once again, and as always, only a lack of understanding about today's modern military world. The SU-35E, is classified a "4++ Generation Fighter" though its true capabilities go well beyond the original/current crop of 4 & 4+ Generation mounts, like the F-15, F-16, F-18, Eurofighter Typhoon, French Dassault Rafael etc. The SU-35E has a forward and rear-facing Phazotron radar system capable of simultaneous tracking of 34 targets up to 92 miles, (even over extremely uneven terrain). Its cockpit design contains a colour CRT display unit, as well as HUD (Head-Up Display unit) along with digital fly-by-wire (FBW) capability, equipped with quadruple redundancy - (the onboard computers will always find four different ways to achieve the desired results of its combat mission). Its avionics also include an Irbis-E passive phased array radar system. The SU-35E, only falls short of the standard adopted for true 5th Generation, by its lack of stealth. Yet, as we've all seen, the SU-35E's tactical value has increased massively, and its overall combat ability has broadened considerably. Meaning, the F-16, is, in effect, an obsolete, unusable aircraft in Ukraine, (and in every way imaginable), and the US must know this, really. And that shows us all, the real level of desperation we are really seeing from the USA, today.
@@airshowvision What is it, you think you could ever achieve by talking nothing but uneducated idiocy about these aircraft? Why is it that either you know nothing about these aircraft, or you're only hiding the obvious truth? The F-35B, was claimed to be a stealthy single engine multirole combat aircraft, that unlike the Harrier, would be supersonic, stealthy, with modern avionics systems, and like the Harrier, would be VTOL capable. This is why the British originally designed the two carriers without ramps. Only one of the biggest technical headaches, the British always had when building the Harrier, was the VTOL, - transferring from "lift" (downward nozzles), to forward flight (rear-facing nozzles), to then fly away from the lift-off. Apparently to achieve it took the British a hell of a lot of technical work, (three - four months at a time, over 3 years). Look up all the variants they made, but they never gave up, and they finally figured it out. I made the claim long before we saw the F-35B, that it wouldn't be VTOL capable, (even with the Rolls-Royce lift engines), because, the US has tried to produce and build a VTOL combat aircraft many times before, only they've failed each time, only ever managing to produce and build the British AV-8 Sea Harrier, able to do so. Every US airframe (and there have been many), have all failed. Copy and paste “2013 MCAS Yuma Air Show - AV8B Harrier Demo” into RUclips search. At 7 mins, 50 seconds, you'll watch a Harrier performing a proper VTOL. You'll see it lift off vertically, and then fly away from the lift-off, and you'll see the transfer of nozzles take place. Yet, you'll not find any footage anywhere, of the F-35B performing a full VTOL. Yet Lockheed Martin do claim it is VTOL capable, when it, so clearly, is not. Copy and Paste “First F-35B Vertical Takeoff Test” into RUclips search. You'll see it lift off, only then you'll see it return straight back down from the lift-off. You'll never see it fly away from the lift-off! Believe me, if it could, we'd see footage of it doing so everywhere - like we still see on all the footage of the Harrier doing so. But you'll not find any footage, anywhere, of the F-35B performing a VTOL. Believe me, if they could, we'd have footage everywhere of them doing so, but you'll not find even one piece of footage of them ever performing a VTOL. They're supposed to be carrier-based aircraft, now meaning, any slight damage to the deck or ramp, and they're unable to get the aircraft airborne! Defeating the entire purpose of having the aircraft in the first place! You can't ever lose an entire carrier, in battle, for only minor damage?, I mean goodness me, whatever next? So, why is the US lying about this? It's obviously because, the US is still a country that's never managed to produce & build a VTOL fighter aircraft. Britain did so in the late 50s, Russia did so in the late 60s, the USA has tried and failed numerous times, so it seems this time, they're going to try to lie about it. That country is a travesty, man! But it does show us, that Lockheed do indeed produce propaganda aircraft, as the F-22 is exactly the same... A failed aircraft, so today, only being used for propaganda purposes! Typical US propaganda, usually consists of silly falsehoods, fake misinformation claims, or just twisted truths, like the F-15, is said to be unbeaten in air-to-air combat? It's true (ish), only when we look at every aircraft shot down by an F-15, we find that none had any offensive capabilities, most had little if anything defensive, many without even a basic radar, meaning, you'd be absolutely stunned, if the F-15 didn't shoot every one of them down! So it's just a meaningless remedial propaganda claim. However, there is another aircraft, that's also unbeaten in air-to-air combat, that has faced off against aircraft just as capable, and just as well armed as itself, (only it's not American, so you'll never hear about it). The British Sea Harrier, is actually, the (only) aircraft unbeaten in air-to-air combat, that has faced off against worthy, viable opposition. And that really is a huge factor, that's worth knowing, unlike the F-15 propaganda claim, that you'd be shocked if it hadn't managed. You never see the delusional Americans questioning why the US government made it illegal to sell the F-22? The US government, seemingly want it believed, that because it's so good, they don't want anyone else to have it. Yet, that actually makes no sense at all, none, not even a little sense. As the facts are, they've no idea what's just around the corner in new modern military technologies, (and with the speed we're seeing so much new hi tech military tactical hardware being designed, developed, and created today), it could have made great sense to sell the F-22 at some stage. (If it actually works). If it worked, they'd have been able to recoup many of the resources spent on the aircraft, if not the resources in their entirety, even a profit! Yet, as always, there's another, and much more likely, reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22. If it is, just as I suspect it is, a "lemon", that was intended to be their leading front line strike aircraft, (that's failed), yet because of the cost/expense, to design and build them, they can't just write it off. So the US have then only used the F-22 for propaganda purposes? Then what better way of preventing anyone else from finding out, that it actually doesn't work, and really is a lemon, than making it illegal to sell? Logically thinking, that's the only real possible reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22. -- It can only be, because it's a failed aircraft that was intended to be their leading front line 5th generation strike aircraft. Well 20 years, the US have had the F-22 in service, and they've been in wars the entire time, yet they've never used it, not once! And even more telling, was, after Russia arrived in Syria in 2015, the US removed every F-22 from right across the Middle East... Iraq, Tukey, UAE and Jordan. Absolutely no doubt about it, I guarantee that we'll never see the F-22 involved in any real war scenario, or even involved in any major sortie, because it's basically junk. They've even trashed all the infrastructure they had in place to build more of them.
Sadly the UK has stupidly strict rules on EVERYTHING which might cause one or more of us to possibly injure ourselves and yes flares are tightly controlled, but not actually banned as such. I believe the operator has to prove that they can store them safely, which is crazy considering RAF Fairford is a major weapons base!
There are dozens of camp sites dotted all around Fairford but you could also try calling the cirencester tourist board for more help with local accommodation
Look carefully and you can see the whole shape of the conformal tanks have been reshaped and better intergrated - also better engines etc . . . completely different from the USAF version.
@@airshowvision there are no CFTs, theyre removed for the demo. but beyond the better engines theres also FBW systems, those MAWS in those triangle housings sitting just below and in between the pilot and WSO and a new cockpit with one massive MDF in the middle insteal of three small ones. no wide angle hud tho like in the F-15E
@@airshowvision It's not at all completely different from the USAF version. First, the USAF has several different variants of the F-15. Second, the F-15QA built for the Qatari military is the precursor of the USAF's F-15EX. The F-15EX is the USAF's new F-15 baseline, and includes the same engines as the F-15QA.
Qatar F15. The Saudi F15 was at this show and you can see it depart with the Airbus tanker on my departure video. ruclips.net/video/zxBDdRkywh4/видео.html
Turkish pilot F16....WOW what a pilot...amazind demo....Qatarian F15 wowser too tailslides ,reverse inverted flat spin what cant they do ?...lol..awesome pilot too
Le meilleur avions avec les meilleurs pilotes !!! Que dire c magnifique !!!😘😘😘❤❤❤
Glad you enjoyed it!
Cheers from Brazil. Thanks for sharing
You are welcome!
thanks from Powidz,Poland
Welcome!
Thx for being there😎👍
Thanks a Salute form Mexico
No problem!
11:52 solotürks wonderfull take off
Yes a really great team, with not one but two jets fully painted the same in case of breakdown issues.
That Qatari F-15 performance starting at 42:30 was some of the BEST flying of that aircraft I've ever seen! Man, I wish I was there to see it. I was stationed at Lakenheath in the late 80's-early 90's and have seen a LOT of airshows (especially Mildenhall's AirFete) but I regret not seeing those guys!
I think they were test pilots who flew this jet - with quite a bit more thrust than the earlier F15's have.
awesome Thanks for the stream watching and liking
Hope you enjoy the sights and sounds of freedom!
Thanks for sharing 👍👊🙏
No problem 👍
JAS 39 Gripen, Awesome! ♥
It sure is!
Grippen have taxy plane ..... no efficience...
Just in your contry !!! So noisy !!
yeah that inveted climb kills airspeed but he did it effotlessly...thank god for lift ,beats gravity lol
hell of engineering superiority has gone into the new F-15, material engineering to be specific.
i think it is not overpriced, worth it all the duck$
I am sure - I need to find out more regarding this beast.
15:35 god damnnnn
Solo Türks Squadron
That demonstration by the F-15 was beautiful. Excellent video of many great planes.👍🏻😁
Yes thank you - the F-15 was better than I had hoped for, and great to see one of them displayed with a heavy weapon load which is sadly quite rare.
@@airshowvision Hilarious display of our own obsolete aircraft, that are of no use against anyone or anything today, outstanding!
@@airshowvision Psst, tell us, what do the F-35 have available to them to detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR? LOL... Keep it quite, as they have absolutely nothing. Hahaha
@@airshowvision Claiming the F-16 would be a game changer in Ukraine, must be one of the dumbest things anyone could claim. What will they be? Game changer log number: 869? LMAO!
Seriously, though, just what could the F-16 achieve in Ukrainian airspace, today? Or in fact, how long could an F-16 survive in Ukrainian airspace, more to the point? I'd have to estimate the F-16, would have a combat life expectancy, of less than 30 minutes over Ukraine, (and that's extremely generous).
You only need to understand what it would be facing? Regardless, that we already know the F-16 can't survive against the S-300 anti-air defences, it would then need to survive against, for example, a SU-35E? So, how could it survive, is the only real question that matters? It's once again, and as always, only a lack of understanding about today's modern military world.
The SU-35E, is classified a "4++ Generation Fighter" though its true capabilities go well beyond the original/current crop of 4 & 4+ Generation mounts, like the F-15, F-16, F-18, Eurofighter Typhoon, French Dassault Rafael etc. The SU-35E has a forward and rear-facing Phazotron radar system capable of simultaneous tracking of 34 targets up to 92 miles, (even over extremely uneven terrain).
Its cockpit design contains a colour CRT display unit, as well as HUD (Head-Up Display unit) along with digital fly-by-wire (FBW) capability, equipped with quadruple redundancy - (the onboard computers will always find four different ways to achieve the desired results of its combat mission). Its avionics also include an Irbis-E passive phased array radar system.
The SU-35E, only falls short of the standard adopted for true 5th Generation, by its lack of stealth. Yet, as we've all seen, the SU-35E's tactical value has increased massively, and its overall combat ability has broadened considerably. Meaning, the F-16, is, in effect, an obsolete, unusable aircraft in Ukraine, (and in every way imaginable), and the US must know this, really.
And that shows us all, the real level of desperation we are really seeing from the USA, today.
@@airshowvision What is it, you think you could ever achieve by talking nothing but uneducated idiocy about these aircraft? Why is it that either you know nothing about these aircraft, or you're only hiding the obvious truth?
The F-35B, was claimed to be a stealthy single engine multirole combat aircraft, that unlike the Harrier, would be supersonic, stealthy, with modern avionics systems, and like the Harrier, would be VTOL capable. This is why the British originally designed the two carriers without ramps.
Only one of the biggest technical headaches, the British always had when building the Harrier, was the VTOL, - transferring from "lift" (downward nozzles), to forward flight (rear-facing nozzles), to then fly away from the lift-off.
Apparently to achieve it took the British a hell of a lot of technical work, (three - four months at a time, over 3 years). Look up all the variants they made, but they never gave up, and they finally figured it out.
I made the claim long before we saw the F-35B, that it wouldn't be VTOL capable, (even with the Rolls-Royce lift engines), because, the US has tried to produce and build a VTOL combat aircraft many times before, only they've failed each time, only ever managing to produce and build the British AV-8 Sea Harrier, able to do so. Every US airframe (and there have been many), have all failed.
Copy and paste “2013 MCAS Yuma Air Show - AV8B Harrier Demo” into RUclips search. At 7 mins, 50 seconds, you'll watch a Harrier performing a proper VTOL. You'll see it lift off vertically, and then fly away from the lift-off, and you'll see the transfer of nozzles take place. Yet, you'll not find any footage anywhere, of the F-35B performing a full VTOL.
Yet Lockheed Martin do claim it is VTOL capable, when it, so clearly, is not. Copy and Paste “First F-35B Vertical Takeoff Test” into RUclips search. You'll see it lift off, only then you'll see it return straight back down from the lift-off. You'll never see it fly away from the lift-off! Believe me, if it could, we'd see footage of it doing so everywhere - like we still see on all the footage of the Harrier doing so. But you'll not find any footage, anywhere, of the F-35B performing a VTOL. Believe me, if they could, we'd have footage everywhere of them doing so, but you'll not find even one piece of footage of them ever performing a VTOL.
They're supposed to be carrier-based aircraft, now meaning, any slight damage to the deck or ramp, and they're unable to get the aircraft airborne! Defeating the entire purpose of having the aircraft in the first place! You can't ever lose an entire carrier, in battle, for only minor damage?, I mean goodness me, whatever next?
So, why is the US lying about this? It's obviously because, the US is still a country that's never managed to produce & build a VTOL fighter aircraft. Britain did so in the late 50s, Russia did so in the late 60s, the USA has tried and failed numerous times, so it seems this time, they're going to try to lie about it.
That country is a travesty, man! But it does show us, that Lockheed do indeed produce propaganda aircraft, as the F-22 is exactly the same... A failed aircraft, so today, only being used for propaganda purposes!
Typical US propaganda, usually consists of silly falsehoods, fake misinformation claims, or just twisted truths, like the F-15, is said to be unbeaten in air-to-air combat?
It's true (ish), only when we look at every aircraft shot down by an F-15, we find that none had any offensive capabilities, most had little if anything defensive, many without even a basic radar, meaning, you'd be absolutely stunned, if the F-15 didn't shoot every one of them down!
So it's just a meaningless remedial propaganda claim. However, there is another aircraft, that's also unbeaten in air-to-air combat, that has faced off against aircraft just as capable, and just as well armed as itself, (only it's not American, so you'll never hear about it).
The British Sea Harrier, is actually, the (only) aircraft unbeaten in air-to-air combat, that has faced off against worthy, viable opposition. And that really is a huge factor, that's worth knowing, unlike the F-15 propaganda claim, that you'd be shocked if it hadn't managed.
You never see the delusional Americans questioning why the US government made it illegal to sell the F-22? The US government, seemingly want it believed, that because it's so good, they don't want anyone else to have it. Yet, that actually makes no sense at all, none, not even a little sense.
As the facts are, they've no idea what's just around the corner in new modern military technologies, (and with the speed we're seeing so much new hi tech military tactical hardware being designed, developed, and created today), it could have made great sense to sell the F-22 at some stage. (If it actually works).
If it worked, they'd have been able to recoup many of the resources spent on the aircraft, if not the resources in their entirety, even a profit! Yet, as always, there's another, and much more likely, reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22.
If it is, just as I suspect it is, a "lemon", that was intended to be their leading front line strike aircraft, (that's failed), yet because of the cost/expense, to design and build them, they can't just write it off. So the US have then only used the F-22 for propaganda purposes?
Then what better way of preventing anyone else from finding out, that it actually doesn't work, and really is a lemon, than making it illegal to sell? Logically thinking, that's the only real possible reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22. -- It can only be, because it's a failed aircraft that was intended to be their leading front line 5th generation strike aircraft.
Well 20 years, the US have had the F-22 in service, and they've been in wars the entire time, yet they've never used it, not once!
And even more telling, was, after Russia arrived in Syria in 2015, the US removed every F-22 from right across the Middle East... Iraq, Tukey, UAE and Jordan.
Absolutely no doubt about it, I guarantee that we'll never see the F-22 involved in any real war scenario, or even involved in any major sortie, because it's basically junk.
They've even trashed all the infrastructure they had in place to build more of them.
My god the Qatari Eagle drivers really know how to put on a show!!!
They were not so impressive on the show day when it was low cloud.
That was the best F-15 display I've ever seen in my 58 years. Man, I gotta put that on a really BIG screen....
ชมแล้วตื่นเต้นมาก
Great stuff - thank you!
SOLO TÜRK EXCEPTIONNEL
Wonderful commentary. Now I know the names of all the aircraft and where they come from.
Glad to be of service.
I used to attend every year until the stepladder people ruined a clear view of anything.
😂😂😂😂
They now have their own enclosure away from everyone else
This Time I See The F - 16 Fighting Falcon Is Best, Powerful In RIAT Air Tatoo 2024' , Thanks All, .... Cheerio *****.
Hey, are flares banned in RİAT or something? Because SoloTürk usually uses a lot of flares during their displays
Sadly the UK has stupidly strict rules on EVERYTHING which might cause one or more of us to possibly injure ourselves and yes flares are tightly controlled, but not actually banned as such. I believe the operator has to prove that they can store them safely, which is crazy considering RAF Fairford is a major weapons base!
@@airshowvision I see, thanks! Also great footage
Takt AG 51 bzw MFG 1 waren auch da!
I am planning for 2025 for sure but how do u get to the camp site or is that just for press etc
There are dozens of camp sites dotted all around Fairford but you could also try calling the cirencester tourist board for more help with local accommodation
Hey it’s the F-15 with new paint and different letters
Look carefully and you can see the whole shape of the conformal tanks have been reshaped and better intergrated - also better engines etc . . . completely different from the USAF version.
@@airshowvision there are no CFTs, theyre removed for the demo. but beyond the better engines theres also FBW systems, those MAWS in those triangle housings sitting just below and in between the pilot and WSO and a new cockpit with one massive MDF in the middle insteal of three small ones. no wide angle hud tho like in the F-15E
CAN'T WAIT FOR THE F-15AK EAGLE
@@airshowvision It's not at all completely different from the USAF version. First, the USAF has several different variants of the F-15. Second, the F-15QA built for the Qatari military is the precursor of the USAF's F-15EX. The F-15EX is the USAF's new F-15 baseline, and includes the same engines as the F-15QA.
Menyala boosku 🙃🙃☕️♨️🇮🇩💜🩵💙💙💚👍🙏👈
Best arrival ? 🙂
32:00 sounds like a lamborghini 🤪
Last year I think there were MIG 29s
Sadly it has been a number of years since that happened, and the Ukranians brought the SU27 in 2017/18/19. We need them back soon.
thanks is this F15 airplane? Saudia Arabia (KSA)
Qatar F15. The Saudi F15 was at this show and you can see it depart with the Airbus tanker on my departure video. ruclips.net/video/zxBDdRkywh4/видео.html
Turkish pilot F16....WOW what a pilot...amazind demo....Qatarian F15 wowser too tailslides ,reverse inverted flat spin what cant they do ?...lol..awesome pilot too
Yes - this day turned out better than the actual show day because of the weather and other issues.
❤SOLO TÜRK🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷✌️✌️❤
😆, the Mig F-15 demo
Chappie Doug I aint going make it
I thinked the thumbnail was a f14
ফুলবারি অফিস
9381 Schinner Ville
Assalamualaikum
I think solo turk is best 👍💯
F15EX????
F-15 QA Ababil I believe is the correct designation.
Yak mintsk tolong flight mode ada aku mintak tolong flight mode vedio country
Lapangan terbang sendiri sendiri
The airfield is a US air base.
555 3.18 55555 3.19
The Ukrainian SU-27’s didn’t make it.
They are kinda busy!
@@airshowvision they got shot down.
@@mikes7446 ahahahahahaha
@@mikes7446 ... do you find that funny ?
@@deano93517 ... what are you laughing about?