Видео

I am Colombian and love the Jas Gripen ❤👍

Gripen E = 7 days / week / 365 days in years. Just F..* love the slim and elegant design, and the sound on a gripen is just GORGEOUS!

Y con que van a volar jaja ,preguntenle al gyerrillero gay

Excellent 👍🏻

😀🇸🇪👍🏻

Not only Gripen. Viggen also...

👍👍👍

O WAD, painel do cockpit, é tecnologia Brasileira!

Rafale offcourse... for NUCLEAR WARNING SHOT 😂

Aselsan Gokdeniz?

Magnificant machine

War in Ukraie sowd how uselss is F-16. It took 2 years just for pilot training

A very fine and interesting video 🙂👍

Fake

Gripen E Is Better.

Changing a rafale engine take one hour , three Times less than ur statement

To be able to take off and land on roads is a good feature, also being light weight a excellent aircraft

Embrarer is a good company this jet will serve many countries well. But the 130 has been doing it for nearly 70 years.We a;so have larger globe masters and the galaxies so the US is positioned best out of all for logistics.

And the result is finally here: Gripen Wins the F-15 by 2 kills on the BVR. Dont know why not on news...

Sweden ordered 6 units.

🇨🇴🇧🇷🇸🇪🇨🇷🇵🇭🇿🇦 💪

The will be the eighth nation to operate Gripen 👍🏻

Gripen from Brazil won a simulation war against F-15C.

At Cruzex, this week, this plane shot down two US National Guard F15 eagles in simulated combat.

Yesterday Brazil also announced that they will buy more Gripen E fighters...

The gripen got two "kills" against the F15s

🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩💪👍

🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩💪👍 2

🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩💪👍 2

Gripen E-F uses Meteor air-to-air missiles. Period.

3:51 I's a Typhoon not a Rafale on FLIR. The duck wings are under the cockpit. Even the air inlets are visible.... 6:50 RafalÉ? RafalE.

เทพตกบ่อยไปหน่อยน่ะ

FREMM?

Interesting Video, Thank's for posting. New Sub.👍

Bonne présentation

RAFALE can do "buddy tanking" !

When the Americans are beaten by a generation 4.5 of the French Mosquito with canard wing (Rafale) during an exercise, this comparison of the Grippen with Canard wing Gen 4.5 against an F16 and despite its facelift, the fact remains that the age of its design remains the same...the Grippen is the winner.

CQFD : Et si cette fois c’était la bonne ? En mars dernier une petite phrase prononcée par Emmanuel Macron mettait le feu aux poudres sur le dossier du remplacement des AMX A-1M et des Northrop F-5EM/FM Tiger II de la Força Aérea Brasileira. À l’approche du sommet du G20 à Rio de Janeiro dans trois semaine le dossier revient sur la table avec cette fois un chiffre : il serait question de vingt-quatre Dassault Aviation Rafale F4. Et puis aussi d’hélicoptères légers, de sous-marins, ou encore de véhicules terrestres. En fait le Rafale F4 revient dans le jeu brésilien au meilleur moment pour lui. D’abord le rythme des livraisons de Saab JAS 39E/F Gripen est toujours aussi lent, trop même si on en croit les médias brésiliens. Et ensuite la flotte de chasseurs F-5EM/FM Tiger II est immobilisée pour une durée indéterminée. De ce fait la Força Aérea Brasileira fait ici l’expérience de voler avec seulement quelques avions d’attaque au sol A-1M totalement inadaptés à la défense aérienne et avec moins d’une quinzaine de chasseurs multi-rôles F-39E/F Gripen. Rappelons que le Brésil en terme de superficie c’est 17 fois la France, ce n’est donc pas exactement un petit pays. Même si Dassault Aviation livre encore ses Rafale à un rythme jugé parfois lent c’est un avionneur qui n’a jamais souffert de retards considérables. Sauf peut-être durant la période de confinement du Covid-19, mais là tous les constructeurs étaient logés à la même enseigne ! Aussi cela se sait que l’industriel français est fiable à bien des égards, bien plus que son concurrent suédois. Et ça aux yeux des Brésiliens c’est forcément un argument massue. En outre ils peuvent compter sur leurs partenaires indiens, au sein de l’organisation BRICS, pour leur confirmer les qualités intrinsèques du jet clodoaldien. Enfin le Rafale a le vent en poupe au niveau continental, Colombiens et Péruviens l’ayant largement dans leurs collimateurs respectifs. Si les Brésiliens veulent continuer d’avoir la puissance dominante dans les cieux sud-américains ils doivent donc eux aussi faire l’acquisition d’exemplaires. Car sinon leurs Saab F-39E/F Gripen risquent bien d’avoir l’air miséreux en exercices internationaux face à des Dassault Aviation Rafale colombiens et/ou péruviens.

Bulgaria bought F16 block 70 for nearly twice the price of Gripen....how stupid is that .

This kind of comparisons, though entertaining, are pointless. Take the radar …. what about modes and other details? And by the way Gripen's radar can locate and identify targets up to 120 km away, while the Rafale's RBE2-AA radar has a range of over 200 km. And the EW system? Rafale‘s multi-spectral integrated defensive aids suite SPECTRA (Self-Protection Equipment to Counter Threats for Rafale Aircraft) is possibly the most advanced system besides the F-35.

lol grippen never combat proven ... rafale win easily !

Russia's howitzer has low accuracy rate compared to Western howitzers like Archer.Cope harder Putin's bot.🤣🤣😂🤣

First of all, comparing a single engine jet to a dual engine is like comparing apples with oranges. Of course a dual engine configuration will enable heavier payload including more fuel which will lead to longer range. That’s simply a physics fact. But there is a reason to why Sweden opted for a single engine configuration for the Gripen E, and that is cost. Lower cost can enable more aircraft for the same amount of money, which was a key design goal, and range and payload was deemed good enough. In fact, range and payload has increased from the Gripen C which was also deemed good enough from a Swedish context. So while the Rafale has a longer range and more payload, those features would not have made the Rafale a “winner” for Sweden (or customers with similar needs). These youtube videos with robot voices that compares synthetic benchmarks from spread sheets completely out of context is kind of tiresome and pointless. At least IMHO…

In a genuine ww3 environment, being able to fly off a carrier makes the Rafale the winner. Rafale also is the faster fighter of the lot from order to active to duty, so its more effectively maintained.

I think both are amazing. I love Greece which I think by now has 30 Rafeles either in their hands or partly still incoming, aside if F35s, latest upgraded F16s etc

Le nombre de pays qui ont choisi le Rafale clos définitivement ce débat 🇨🇵

Obviously the guy who made this have no clue about radars, electronic and optronic systems. Counting number of antenna is irrelevant. It is the systems inside and software that is used that makes the difference. How the signals are processed, can it resolve the floating signals and variously modulated signals, hoping signals etc. In radar technology, software is equally important as hardware, especially for AESA radars. It is way to complex to explain in comment, but such comparison is ridiculous at least. Also, Indian F3R are using IRST, that will now be part of F4 Rafale. France cannot introduce it as it's agency must test it and certify it, but it is already available and in use for some time. Rafale has larger wheels, so it is better in that aspect... That is the level of quality of this video🤣🤣🤣

With respect to the LASER warning question; the second window on the Gripen missile detector shown is an optional LASER warning sensor.

This is a fairly bad comparative analysis. First, one should identify which version is really compared. In this case, it seems that the Rafale F-3R version is being used and not the more modern F4.1, with improved electronics. There are also a number of inaccuracies in the data provided. But most importantly you cannot restrict a comparison to 3 criteria. For example, availability and maintenance are critical elements, as well as many other logistics and compatibility criteria. Range, robustness, ergonomics etc. are all important elements for comparison. The reason why Rafale came on top of I believe all the national trials that included both planes is because customers take into account a broad diversity of criteria. But at the end of the day, getting the "best" plane may not be the "best" choice for a country, and there are plenty of cases where a customer should take the Gripen over the Rafale even if the Rafale is usually considered as a better plane, because it fits its needs.

It depends on the user requirements as always but Gripen is the most cost effective fighter in the world at this point! I think the mix of different fighters NATO has makes us more dangerous for the intended opponents. United we stand 💪🏻