Видео

Hold your horses. Gripen E is NOT the same gen as F-16V. F-16 dates back to the 1970's, Gripen E is totally new. Even if it may look like Gripen C (a plan 20+ years younger than the f-16 from the start.) and a modified Gripen C are probably the same gen. as The F-16V. Gripen E is a 5th gen fighter. it's size makes the radar cross section comparable to some "stealth fighters". The current "gen. system" is only an american advertisement trick to sell their own jets. The EW system on Gripen E is more 6th gen. Far superior to anything else today.

This video is kinda wrong on some points. Maybe the inspiration for the iris-t first came from the r73, but they obviously changed it for the MICA missile. The iris-t design is so much like the one of the French MICA, where the r73 got copied by the sidewinder. Back then when they were developing the iris-t, the MICA already entered in service, and became the best short to medium range missile. While the iris-t is only a short range. Without to forgot the iris-t is also copying the unique idea and concept first introduced by the MICA missiles, of being a multiroles missile (air to air, ground to air, sea to air, used as an attack or defense).

The derby not 20 and 40 km Its 45 and 100 km

Ukraine should invest in the Gripen E, these would be great for Ukraine as you can land and launch these planes from anywhere making it hard for Russia to track them down. Ukraine needs new technology to defend itself from the Russians. I also wished that my country Canada bought these planes as they’re more cost effective and the F-35’s, we have a large country and need a large airforce to protect it.

Su27

It shd.read "which", not "what". Pls correct.

This should be the European aircraft of choice.

China has the best CIWS.

Sir i can use this video with credit for my RUclips channel

Passive radar aren’t below AESA radar, it is just they have different purposes and importance, Passive radar are good for encountering stealth fighter jets

Ukraine should purchase Gripen E fighters for their next fighter plane since they can be launched from country roads.

I do not agree with this at all

Children come back to earth.

Lots of random ships shown...

Fun tidbit: Gripen have a peace/war switch. When switched to "war" limits in prestanda are removed.

Gripen C has already shown that it is more than capable of taking down multiple F16’s. For me, the two biggest differences between the two, must be the operational costs. The F16 costs 3.5 times more to fly than the Gripen E. And the Gripen’s sensor fusion ability, and its ability to integrate into a information network.

There is always next level cool shit going on, but Gripen would be the X-wing in Star wars.

Old Gripen won over Chinese plane in training too!😊

I think maybe these ships focus on anti aircraft , instead of anti submarine warfare

Ai-shit

Dude it has 36 VLS cells!! ESSMs are quad packed which means it can carry a maximum of 144 of those if they want to but that's not an optimal configuration since the Mark 41 can carry other type of missiles according to the mission 🚀

Actually an AI voiced video which didn't annoy with unnecessary remarks and constant like reminders. Love that thing. Got too see one live all the way back in 2015 and that thing is very spacious.

Low effort video with too much numbers yet no onscreen text 👎🏻

Some points that (should) have been included to consider: 1. Airfields/bases are prime targets during a real war situation. The cost of defending such bases (and the cost of relocating personnel, repair/servicing equipment) is considerably higher for F-16s (owing to the number ~20 support personnel per jet), plus the limitations of finding alternative bases (e.g. risks of debris in the air-intake on alternative runways). In this regard , the Gripen performs better at more fluid logistical relocation, and operational continuity. 2. Political/Economic support (15:25): Actually, the *requirement* to have political/economic support is possibly a *drawback* for any country which uses the F-16 platform. Why? Because any upgrades, weapons packages need the approval of the country providing the technology. Delays in approvals, partisan politics can add considerable delays, and the situation gets more complex when technology has been co-developed between several nations (in which case, all parties need to reach consensus in agreement, further compounding the complexity/lead-times of any decision making processes). The Swedish Gripen does not have as significant "political/economic baggage" as the F-16. Lastly, any nation's decision to acquire a fighter jet weapons platform is a way more complicated process than the few points outlined in this video. For example, this video does not mention the service lifetime of the airframe (F-16 is about 8000 hours, F-15EX is about 15,000, Gripen is about 8000 hours), then there is the cost-per-hour of flight time, the required flight hours required per pilot (NATO recommends 350 per year as a minimum) to maintain a high level of pilot competence (which also accelerates the depreciation of the airframe), the geographical terrain considerations (combat radius would factor in here), and type of missions the airforce is trying to build the capabilities for (intercept, SEAD, EW, Recon/Spy, GA/A2A), and the contractual negotiations of the rights of usage (e.g. sale to another country)... and much, much more. Plus, if all that wasn't overwhelming enough, the "technology window" - e.g by the time contracts are agreed, production begins (typically more than a year), and deliveries start coming in, new combat capabilities/technologies would have caught-up to surpass the original list of technologies/capabilities considered in the decisioning process. So, decision makers have to consider the risks of production delays (which do happen, and are inevitable), and assess where this sits in a multi-year (decade or more) block of time. So, the summary is: "which fighter jet is better?" is never as simple as deciding which car to buy (given an equal amount of cash to spend, and features to choose from).

Ce classement est assez...surprenant les FREMM Françaises, ont été récompensées a plusieur reprise par la "NAVY" en matière de lutte anti-sous-marine et ce pour la troisième année consécutive. Plusieurs bâtiments français sont lauréats du « Hook’Em Award ». Créée en 1975, cette distinction, remise par le commandant de la 6ème flotte américaine, est attribué aux unités les plus performantes en matière de lutte ASM. « Ce prix d’excellence a été décerné cette année par le vice-amiral d’escadre Ishee (C6F) au vice-amiral d’escadre Boidevezi, commandant de la Task Force 470 (CTF 470) et aux FREMM Auvergne, Bretagne, Languedoc et Provence, pour leurs déploiements en Méditerranée en coordination avec la marine américaine ». Alors après je peux comprendre qu'il y a la théorie, mais pour ce qui du niveau ( le plus important" à ce stade) efficacité sur le théatre d'opération, les FREMM Français méritent certainement une meilleure place. Et là je ne parle pas non plus de la dernière FREMM "l"Amiral Ronarc'h", car elle vient de faire sa première sortie le 9/10/2024. Mais sera une référence dans l'avenir!

And you said nothing about spectra that the Rafale can carry which is the most sofisticated in the world

How do the electronic components survive the G force after been fired?

We did send the only 2 awaks recon plane

Every thing is better then the F-35. 29% is working, they do no harm when on the ground. ruclips.net/video/UOzAZZV3rps/видео.html

If you are small, you have to be smarter! Gripen👍🏻

My over all assessment the Gripen E wins over F16 Viper. How much more if both aircraft companies will collaborate to make a more affordable but equally effective multi role fighter.

They have more systems to help finding the target.

Gripen E can connect and fuse their sensors to detect even F35 long before f35 can see the gripen and long before they are within range with their aging amraams.

The Jas 39 of all kinds uses peacetime settings in all exercises so the capabilities of the fighters radar was restricted.

We are in America we messure in fraction's not decimal's, get with the ptogram.

Nice content but poor English grammar skills in the manuscript for your weak AI narrator!

Gripen C and the F-15s are old acquaintances. During Loyal Arrow in Sweden, 3 F-15C’s from the USAF were intercepted by a Gripen acting as an aggressor. The result was 2 F-15’s shot down and one managed to escape due to better thrust/weight. Since 2006, Gripen has not lost against the F-15, the F-16 or the F-18 ever!

It is Not the first time Gripen (and Swedish pilots) have been in simulated combat, Gripen has been attending Red Flag several times.🫡🇸🇪

give some to Ukraine !

Choosing the Gripen was a smart choice by Brazil, giving a big boost to local aviation industry in technological know how and design philosophy. Gripen is a beautiful aircraft in more ways than one. Besides the technical "stuff", its very pleasing seeing the cooperation between 🇸🇪🤝🇧🇷 On a more personal note, got to say i just Love Brazil, and i Love Brazilian Portuguese....hearing you guys speak is like someone gently whispering poetry in my ear 😂❤️

Congratulations Columbia, you are buying a great fighter! Especially when it comes to EW, electronic warfare, were Gripen probably is the best in the world at the moment.

Which F15 model are we comparing here? The standard F15 was built in 1976 where as the Gripen was built in 1998?!

The Gripen is a highly capable and very beautiful aircraft. Thanks for this video.👏🏻

Gripens have been at Red Flag several times since 2006..!

Philippines should have three of this 💪💪💪💪💪💪

Didi yoy see this? Gripen (2) KILLS vs F-15 (0) KILL simulation war ruclips.net/video/o_c9v4uSExA/видео.htmlsi=sDnG7Pie4D9JvB4p

I am Colombian and love the Jas Gripen ❤👍

Gripen E = 7 days / week / 365 days in years. Just F..* love the slim and elegant design, and the sound on a gripen is just GORGEOUS!

Y con que van a volar jaja ,preguntenle al gyerrillero gay

Excellent 👍🏻