Видео

I like Miranda cameras but I see absolutely no point bashing the Pentax 17 for it. You like old cameras? Fine. Someone else can buy the Pentax 17 if it fits their purpose but don't ruin it for everyone else.

🙄 . . . 🫣 😣 😭 Questo è il mio commento.

I think you speak very well. Thank you for this video. I Just get one of this camera for 150 €. 👍

I bought one in very nice condition a few weeks ago with the 50mm F2 ai. It's my first analog SLR. It's such a neat camera.

It is beautiful but too expensive. 450 is enough for this.

This is a great selection of lenses. The lesser known Japanese brands from the era are also excellent: Fujinon, Tomioka, Yashica/ Chinon/ Revuenon, Topcor etc and of course the German lenses. Once multi-coatings were introduced in into the design of lenses, the gains in lens technology have been incremental and generally at the cost of ever increasing size!

The mechanical sound is magic!

Carl Zeiss 1.4/85mm Planar in Nikon F-mount. Yes, YES and YEEESSS!

I just watched your video about the Sony A7R2, and I think I might opt for that one to adapt my vintage glass on, Una Domanda: I am hoping to use the high resolution of the A7R2, did you notice that cropping in the image you obtained from the vintage glass can introduce some unwanted loss in the quality of the image ?

I Always Enjoy Watching Your Videos !!!!!! :) :) :)

Great advice if you're buying 'face to face', but not so much when buying online.

what battery it use ?

Thank you for your perspective! I think the new Rollei 35 AF is much better than the Pentax 17. I would have welcomed the original 40mm instead of the 35mm for the Rollei. I take photos with a Rollei 35s and I find the new Rollei 35AF interesting if it delivers good image quality. A Pentax 17 with an f1.7 lens :-) and better choice of materials would have pleased many analog camera fans. The old Olympus Pen D3 has an f1.7 lens and half frame. Pentax-Ricoh made the wrong choice here when it came to equipping the Pentax 17!!! The price of the new Rollei 35AF is OK! Film and development and scanning costs are really expensive!!!! It doesn't matter which analog camera you use. If these prices continue to rise, analog photography will become a super luxury. A hobby that most people no longer want or can afford.

I love it! Where are the pictures with film, Sir?

I see you also put the lens cap on upside down - I thought I was the only one!

I have the Vivitar Series 1 lens in 70-210. The spring-loaded tiny ball bearing for the F stops works fine. Yours may be stuck inside or missing? Nikon mount.

It is very nice, but you can get a wonderful camera from the 80-90'ies for €50,-

What a nice channel you have! I got one of these yesterday 😊 I already have 3 hexanon lenses to adapt to digital cameras, so I decided to get the original camera for them. Still thing about batteries - it came without.

Hello friend! I also scan my film negatives with my A7Rii. Pro tip: Use a bright blue light table when you record the RAW. This will shift the color information in the RAW so you can get perfect color balance with one click by using the white balance tool and selecting an unexposed piece of the film. This is not possible when scanning color negatives against a white light table. ❤

I am actually also in a process to test a lot of 50mm lenses. The canon, the Nikon, the Pentax are already finished projects and I agree with your results. I did not compare these one by one, but the canon is for sure the most weakest. I especially didn’t like the canons bokeh. At the moment I test a Nikon 1.8 and it is much better, than the 1.4 wide open on the Center. Maybe the 1.4 was more for marketing and less for usability. 😊

Great collection

Could it be the translucent mirror, and not double sensor that does the trick?

I Do Not Condone or Celebrate, what the Nazi System did in ANY-WAY (and I hope You Do-Not)... But I do not think that history should be removed or forgotten or, it may reoccur... We are seeing a resurgence of such Horrible Hatred in Many Modern Governments around the World, and I think that we can show what happened, when Charismatic Orators , try to create their own Cult !!!!!!! We may see that camera for what it is, A Time To Remember So It Never Returns (and also just a camera)!!!!!!! If I were You I would tape over the markings if You take it outside (or simply use a Leica, Leica copy or FED or Zorki) for the fun of using this type..... I am not sure why the FED, Zorki, n Keiv do not create the same kind of hatred (if we look at the kind of Government and Rulers, of the Past, and in USSR n Russia of today) FOOD for THOUGHT: Many manufacturers from times gone by were builders of weapons of war, and we buy their offerings today, and no such display of hate as some commentors here (HMMM)..... Maybe I am Naive (Love n Peace to All) :( :( :(

Eclectic Collection :) And You Use them !!!! ThankYou :) :) :)

tyvm for another fun vid. I would've loved to see more images with each camera, but that might be a bit much. very interesting collection - I wish I had a few of them for myself! I have an earlier version of your porst 135mm f1.8 - the spiratone 135mm f1.8. I don't think it has any coatings to speak of so it flares like crazy and runs from contrast (olympus mount).

You need to give the make of the lens

Love your collection, thank you for the display.

Can I know where to buy this camera? It's hard to find it now.... Many thanks:)

How can you update this camera in 2024?

there’s nothing to lough or smile, showing a camera with those emblems… why you didn’t post the same video on your other channel?

I read the video thumbnail as "Are these really Sexy?" 😂😂😅😅

I don't see the meteor mic in the wild much.

How do you adapt these lenses to the cameras?

I have a Sony A57 in my collection. It's a nice light camera compared to its reflex brothers and because there's no mirror it just makes a "snick" noise as the focal plane shutter operates. The focus is a bit slow and the EVF although workable is nothing compared to the latest models. Y

rip

Just a dude talking about camera gear - love it!

I believe in the DSLT, the light transmission loss is 1/3rd of a stop, rather than 1/3rd of the total light. So, it’s 1/3rd of 50%.

awesome! was the lenses on perfect condition with no molds, scratches or haze?

Thanks! (Gracias en español)

But the Pentax 17 costs only 550...

tyvm for the comparison. although i disagree with a few of your findings, your thoroughness made it easy for me to come to my own conclusions. i own all of these lenses except i have an older version of the nikon. i hope you will also do a comparison of the 35mm f2 models of all these lenses (f1.8 for the minolta). great video!

You got scammed bro these are hella fake

lmao you got scammed

Maybe not such a good idea to go outside with it to shoot pictures.

Not cool.

Yep, fake Leica with fake markings, they going around for years now. The real ones that were used by the German army didn't have any eagle engraving, they were just marked with "Eigentum" (ownership) marking, either Kriegsmarine, Luftwaffe or Wehrmacht. They were I believe all Leica IIIc models and they have a specific serial range (which can be looked up online). The real ones in good condition go easily around the 2000euro mark, excellent examples even more.

Kamerad, hat diese Kamera auch einen "Blitzkrieg" Modus? xD Grüße aus der Führerhauptstadt Berlin.

I love it that’s really cool :3

Check the laws for Nazi symbols or memorabilia and sale or purchase. It is forbidden in many countries (and certainly in the EU). Be careful and maybe check. There where never Nazi 'branded' cameras that left a factory as far documentation shows. Some people at the time did have jewelers or craftsmen engraving their belongings with Nazi symbols, among some are camera's.

1:13 "...estimation focusing" Don't under-eastimate that method - Rollei 35S's 'estimation focusing' was/is great for "getting a feel" for distances and, combined with setting the aperture, for depth-of-field. I did learn(ed) a lot from it.