Видео

You have a gift in teaching!

Very good teaching! Thank you 🙏

Here i may sound hypocrite but I support both views equally since I studied sanskrit before ancient greek/Koine Greek. I have a different opinion I would teach to be and to have before going to any other verb form where I would teach them both aorist and present form for them. along with ill rather teach the verb system/logic. for example a lot of exceptions cold be explained using sanskrit logic like how Baínō has a N in the middle since sanskrit grammars talk about a nasal present infix in present tense). second rather learnt using aspect approach over tense approach cause it made sense to me (one biggest difference between sanskrit and ancient greek in terms of past tense is perfect tense acts as an inferential/renerrative tense(aorist of narration) and pluperfect as an infernetial and renerative (imperfect of narration) teaching aorist helps in learning many other forms infact since we have classes of aorist 1. sigmatic aorist 2. root aorist 3. reduplicative aorist 4. Strong aorist(which go under guṇatvas) - basically pheugō ---> éphugōn eu --> u as u stated lūō as the stem where its lab it can be explained using gunation which would be helpful(it may sound a lot but its due to sanskrit) reduplicative aorist helps in teaching perfect form more over the only difference is from sigmatic aorist and perfect is the -s- over a -k- then it would help in teaching future form where we use the sigmatic future. then aorist form would help to pave the way for imperfect form since of the é- (á- in sanskrti) prefix. one change we can do it rather than having present form is using the root form and present form which may be easier also rather than introducing them together we can break it into sigmatic aorist, root aorist reduplication aorist and string aorist where sigmatic shall be taught before. how sanskrit it taught the dictionary form is the gunationed root like the word for to be is bhū/bhuh² which goes under gunation and becomes bhāv(vedic)/bhav(classical) which us like how phu became pheu in present. then we give other forms comes in. after exam I can teach the aorist paradime

Thanks for your great video! ❤❤❤

Thanks for the great video, even living in California and now in the Philippines I have never met any Greek speakers, and at church never met any other students of Koine Greek, maybe someday I will visit Greece. ❤❤❤

Anyone else here from Mike Winger vid?

123 amen

Fantastic , thank you!

Thanks❤

Honestly the hardest part is reading it for me its almost impossible

Awesome

Personally, I go with Modern Greek pronunciation adding two more vowels, viz. [e] and [y] for η (ῃ) and υ (υι), οι respectively, instead of pronouncing all of them like [i]. These distinctions are historically justified and avoid a lot of annoying homophones (like ἡμεῖς vs. ὑμεῖς). Still, this pronunciation is perfectly understandable for someone who is familiar with the Modern pronunciation.

Thank you.

When I studied Greek in college, my professor would use the Erasmian pronunciation scheme for Classical Greek, but when it came to New Testament passages, she would have me, a native speaker, recite the passages so the other students could hear what Koine really sounded like. It came as a revelation to them how beautiful and natural it sounded as compared to the made-up Erasmian, which to them sounded awkward, stilted and demonstrably English-accented. One commented how Erasmian sounded about as authentic as a Texan trying to order lunch in French at a Paris bistro. My professor explained that itacism was essentially complete by the Second Century BC and Koine of the First Century AD was virtually identical to modern Greek. My professor was the renowned papyrologist Ann Ellis Hanson, professor of Classics at Yale, and the only Greek scholar to be given a chair in Classics at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. Your case for modern pronunciation is supported by one of the most famous Greek scholars in the world. If anyone is interested in hearing the New Testament as it actually sounded, you can download the Bible.is app where you can hear the Bible recited in virtually every language on Earth. The one you're looking for is the Greek Patriarchal Text of 1904, which is close to the Textus Receipts underlying the King James Version. Listen to some of it, and then tell me that the cringeworthy Erasmian or "reconstructed" schemes sound better and more real than it.

Amen Amen Amen you talk perfect sense

things you said are true. But there was one official way of pronoucing every letter. For example a Japanese who cant pronounce the L in an english word has a different pronounciation than a british but he is INCORRECT. So I guess the whole argument is how Greeks were pronouncing greek, not how Greek was spoken in the middle east. That's what's important for most people that study ancient greek literature or are just interested in ancient greek.

Amen, amen, AMEN

amen, amen, amen!

amen

Wow! Very cool

Amen Amen Amen

Modern Greek speakers are not afraid of homonyms. We kinda hear the etymology because we are familiar with exactly what Koine did to ancient Greek language: it allowed a less scientific way to aproach it. This is propably the recipe for success of a global language. Erasmus ignored this fact. I mean it is a Paradoxon for itself when a scholar is trying to explore a language which was taken from the scholars, simplified in its pronunciation by the people. Μη μου τους κύκλους τάραττε...

Thanks!!

Amen, amen v'amen!

In John 18:36, Jesus Christ said, “Ἡ βασιλεία ἡ ἐμὴ οὐκ ἔστιν ἐκ τοῦ κόσμου τούτου,” or in English, “My kingdom is not of this world.” The vaguer “from here,” instead of “of this world,” looks like a textual alteration by medieval Christian Nationalists wanting to obscure the fact that Jesus separated church and state.

Thoughtful video on prononciation, thanks!

Thanks Sir

Confusing. The website claims to be teaching Koine but this video (linked from the website) teaches Erasmian. These are not the same. Can you explain the mixed-up signalling?

Thanks Sir

John 5:23 23so that all may honor the Son just as they honor the Father. Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent him. Hebrews 1:6 6But when he again brings his Firstborn into the inhabited earth, he says: “And let all of God’s angels do obeisance to him.” Revelation 5:12 12and they were saying with a loud voice: “The Lamb who was slaughtered is worthy to receive the power and riches and wisdom and strength and honor and glory and blessing.”

1) Amen 2)Amen 3)Amen.......... Isaiah 60:16, Jn 4:42, Isaiah 43:11, EPH:5:23........ only one SAVIOUR!!!! AMEN!

Just awesome!

He must have been an uneducated Australian!

Oh my goodness. This was so bad. The very first example concerning Peter and the conclusion that the creator of this video came to is completely unfounded. Humans can accept proskuneo or worship from other men. Read 1 Chron. 29:20. The whole congregation of Israel “bows down and worships God and the king”! There’s no differentiation made between the worship given to Jah and to the human king of Israel. Does this indisputable fact make David or Solomon, God Almighty? No. So a creature placed in positions of authority that represent God’s rulership can receive “worship” and this doesn’t take away glory from God. In the case of Peter the man was obviously worshipping him as if he literally was God Almighty. This is why Peter rejected this act. Like most words, the word “worship” has a semantic range and context will determine its meaning. But even in verses like 1 Chron. 29:20 where no distinction is made between the worship given to Jah and to the king of Israel we know that the worship given to both was not the same.

Knowing the JW's, they dont debate on line. So when you make these claims like J"W's cannot answer..." its unfair, and probably NOT true! Ive spoken to them many times and they really know their bibles! Ok you can be a 'smart Alec' and baffle a JW youth handing out leaflets on the street while you illegally film them e.t.c! however, have you ever sat down with an experienced veteran JW and discussed the trinity? I expect not! Anyone can be a 'keyboard warrior'. Being a true Christian is not all about 'proving self right and others wrong'!

12:37 - Ha! - that’s a good one! (maybe not so much NT/Koine Greek, but I assure you: Greek IS difficult- very, very difficult...) 🤯

Years ago, there was a souvlaki joint in Astoria New York called, “Jesus The Greek” - they made the best lamb kebab, and if you ordered the ‘Cana Wedding luncheon’ you got served a half litre of their house wine for the price of a 500 ml bottled water; I also recall such specialties as ‘The Last Supper Paschal Lamb dinner platter”, the ‘Road to Emmaus on-the-go gyros’, and ‘The Fishes & Barley Loaves Double-Decker sandwhich’.

This poster is not making any valid points! I am not a JW but have had many serious discussions with them on this and similar subjects! I know for a fact that they fully understand all the know points this guy is making! what do they prove? Only that the word 'proskeneo' can mean a DEGREE of reverence & worship. Unlike catholics & protestants who 'worship' saints and even Jesus Christ, leaving the worship of the FATHER completely out of their minds! They do not pray to the Father THROUGH Jesus Christ, and worship GOD THE FATHER, again THROUGH Jesus Christ, though Jesus himself taught us do do that very thing! See John 14:6.

I love your teachings

Thank you for the great work. You are making Greek simple and enjoyable.

Great take - I was thinking of a similar issue when hearing about reconstruction pronunciation. And I ended up deciding since there’s VERY little likelihood of me actually conversing with someone in biblical Greek, it’s better to learn the Modern Greek pronunciation. If I eventually am speaking with modern Greeks some day, I won’t sound crazy!

The Bible clearly states that before humans appeared on the earth only Jehovah's family of witnesses existed in the universe. The first witness to leave the family was the angel who became "Satan" the first apostate. Today either one is serving Jehovah or the adversary Satan. There is no sitting on the fence.

The Greek word proskuneō can be translated into various meanings. Jesus himself used it in his example of the King and his slave. Matthew 18:26 KJV The servant therefore fell down, and WORSHIPED him, saying, Lord, have patience with me, and I will pay thee all. Other translations use other words, such as honour, bend the knees to, bow down etc. Thus, taking the word worship to show that Jesus was God makes no sense. Peter was worshipped. Plenty of people are worshiped in everyday life. People in high positions are addressed as 'Your worship'. If Jesus wanted worship of any kind why did he say: (Matthew 20:28) Just as the Son of man came, NOT TO BE MINISERED TO, but to minister and to give his life as a ransom in exchange for many.” Jesus is a SLAVE of God.

Thank you. You are gifted in demystifying the complex. I am enriched.

This is awesome. I had difficulties understanding how the article could be used as a personal pronoun.

❤😊Awesome! Thank you!

God bless you brother you exposed the devil servers

Priskineo ruclips.net/video/vbUmTmlYeIs/видео.html&si=w3Z16eZWqfPG5W_b Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer