Видео

is there a single reason to quad remesh a hard surface asset? unless you want it to be bendable ofc.

@@Munsplit can't I just use triangulate modifier?(just asking)

@@pritampaul3127 ofc you can!

Dear ShapeRush, I want to express my deepest gratitude for taking the time to watch my videos and provide constructive criticism. Your comment has truly made an impact on me, and I appreciate your honesty and straightforwardness. It’s not every day that someone cares enough to offer feedback, especially when it comes to creative work. Upon reflection, I realize that your advice is incredibly valuable. The idea of duplicating my model and documenting the stages of my work is both practical and insightful. It’s like a light bulb moment-I can’t believe I hadn’t thought of it before! Your suggestion has opened my eyes to a more efficient and organized approach. I’m genuinely thankful for your perspective. In fact, I’ve already started implementing your recommendation. I’ve created a detailed timeline for my next project, breaking it down into manageable stages. Each step is meticulously documented, and I can already see the benefits. Not only does this method help me keep track of my progress, but it also allows me to identify areas for improvement more easily. Your comment has also prompted me to reevaluate my mindset. You’re right-I shouldn’t complain like a noob. Instead, I should embrace challenges and view them as opportunities for growth. Your straightforward language has cut through any self-doubt, and I’m determined to rise to the occasion. I’ve even shared your insights with my fellow creators. We’ve had some enlightening discussions about workflow optimization, and your name has become synonymous with practical wisdom. You’ve become a legend in our little creative community, ShapeRush! So, thank you. Thank you for being candid, for pushing me to think differently, and for making me a better artist. I’ll continue to learn from your words and strive to improve. And if you ever have more advice to share, please don’t hesitate-I’ll be all ears (or eyes, in this case). Wishing you all the best in your creative endeavors, ShapeRush. May your insights continue to inspire others as they have inspired me.

im really sorry, i shouldve named the video "why go solid early in 99.9% of situations (not including advanced surfacing)". to be fair i wasnt able to imagine a single scenario where working on a sketch in plasticity beyond basic shapes would be beneficial, but there is a chance that im wrong so i had to subtract 0.1%. BUT it doesnt mean you have to! you can do whatever you want! just as i am, and i will use this argument to keep the video as is, thank you!

@@Munsplit Thank you too! By basic shapes do you mean you take the model and enhance it elsewhere, like in Zbrush?

im actually not sure what you mean. blured? looks fine to me, but yeah, in general blender baking is not as good as marmoset

I mean that the normal map colours are a little bit "faded" ( I think thats a good word) compared with other baking softwares. that's true blender bakes are not as good quality as MT for example:)Thanks for the awesome workflow! @@Munsplit

Yes!

you can dm me on discord (@beelb0u) with the screenshots but probably not much you can do

I have solution for that. You should create some kind of loop around scew. It should be surrounded by perpendicular vertex normals

потому что он теперь бесплатно на этом же йотуб канале.

Спасибо! Вообще это чудо что у меня что-то вышло, все мои знакомые даже те кто учили меня геймреди считали что это тухлая задумка и все что можно уже давно придумали. По вопросам- честно я хз. Тут проблема что за 2 месяца до релиза туториала я не умел делать геймреди, вот вы спросили а не поедет ли скейл, а я не знаю, может и поедет, хз, я даже не смотрел особо на это, просто видел что в целом люди так делают.

Fixed

перпендикулярно в смысле без дисторшна? да хз никак наверное, весь этот процесс он хорош если ты согласен на все компромиссы, если что-то не нравится скорее всего сильно лучше сделать никак нельзя, и надо просто пойти стандартно збраш+марм. а если ты про несколько объектов на одну лоуполь, то просто называешь соответствующе и бейкаешь много на один. разве что лучше взять какой аддон который антиальязинг сможет накинуть без рендера 4х размера.

@@Munsplit Спасибо

are you sure about that? have you tried it yourself?

@@Munsplit Yes, I use it every time with success, it works like a harm

i think im not the best person to ask since i dont really do a lot of surfacing. ive dropped moi after an hour when looking for a fusion alternative. for me its moi < fusion < plasticity with like really huge gaps inbetween, i know some surfacing people who switched from moi to plasticity, they say some stuff is better, some stuff is worse, but overall it felt like an upgrade to them.

мармосет печет лучше льва и тигра но зато в цирке с бевел шейдером не выступает. опять же, если очень надо можно отсюда только булианы оболочек взять и сделать стандартно збраш+марм. Да блендер печет хуже, но к сожалению блендеровский бевел шейдер запекать можно только в самом блендере.

​@@Munsplitчестно говоря, я не понимаю почему в блендере до сих пор не сделали нормальный бейкер. Если бы можно было нормально печь с бевел шейдера то это изменило бы мир. Зато они испортили опцию auto smooth в новом обновлении

Thank you for your kind words, this means a lot to me!

^^

zavtra stanet besplatniy, k relizu 1.4

because you don't have enough brains.what you just saw is a license from the Siemens cad of the parasolid core, with a synchronous simulation cad interface from the same Siemens

Damn, thanks for your support! i hope you will like it. the first one might be boring but it has everything id want to know myself if i was starting out.

Thats a good question. A lot of artists who are switching to PL (like myself) use it as a faster fusion 360 alternative. starts in seconds, works faster, can handle working in a much dirtier way, ui is much faster. i dont want precision sketches, or history, i want to extrude a thing, move faces around until it looks good, and if it doesnt i want to just delete it. history would only slow me down. a lot of other people come from polygonal modeling where its a pain to manage complex boolean structures if you want to stay somewhat dynamic, a lot of shading issues, cant easily use your concept as a hp or lp, and so on. i dont care if i need to fillet my model in a separate software that would take me from 1 to 20 minutes if modeling something in PL this way would take me 5 days instead of 10.

@@Munsplit Agree Fusion360 is nice, but Plasticity does the same and in cases better thing using the same workflow.

For quick dirty cad style modeling it's not bad at all... procedural stuff takes time planning and thinking to set up correctly and often isn't worth the time for a one-off model... it's really meant for making variations of a specific type of object IE same thing but all look slightly different.. like a tree or plant generator.