Видео

The truth, as always, is sidestepped by JL. The truth is that AI is real, but god isn't.

If your god made a global flood and killed all humans then where are the fossils of those humans. Where did all the water go? LMAO

1. *If God is willing to prevent evil but not able, then He is not omnipotent (all-powerful).* 2. *If He is able but not willing, then He is malevolent (not all-good).* 3. *If He is both able and willing, then why does evil exist?* 4. *If He is neither able nor willing, then why call Him God?*

...no doubt, that some very good points have been made. However, the one most difficult question asked over why man suffers, leading many doubt there is a God,...was either skirted around that no one would be offended,...or John has not had it revealed to him yet. Thank you John, for at least your submission to be used to give testimony as you have been.

Atheism offers the truth. .

Why you are looking the texte in Hebrew !? Jesus never talked in Hebrew but in Araméen. So you are wrong, no matter with witch specialist in Hebrew you consult.

this worldly question has a worldly answer as a man, none of the above. the spiritual answer is written in james from the book of god.

In summary John is saying that, in his view, science can't answer all the questions from which it follows that there must be an eternal deity who created everything. Non sequitur.

JL is not clever. He's a charlatan. He is the master of doubt and fear, the champion of uncertainty and legerdemain, undermining Science every chance he gets, so he can replace it with his cult-like doctrine of a creator.

Christianity is not different from any other religion. The basic foundation of all religions is belief in myths and lies. Oh yes, the fables are different, but the principal tenet is "We are the only true religion, and everyone else is wrong" or "My god is the only true gods, all other gods are fake." Actually there is nobody who holds a Christian religion. There are more than several thousand religions under the umbrella of Christianity; these Christian religions are at odds with each other, and sometimes fight wars over their differences.

I once heard a story that captures the irony of the 'I don’t believe in God because of suffering' argument, and I think it’s worth sharing. Imagine God hears our complaints and eliminates all our greatest fears: diseases, cancer, wars-you name it. Suddenly, we’re living in a utopia of peace, health, and harmony. But wait! The atheist pipes up: 'How can I believe in a God who lets me experience minor discomforts?' Fine, says God, and poof-no discomforts at all. Now, do you think everyone’s finally satisfied? Of course not! Someone will grumble, 'How can I believe in a God who lets me feel sad sometimes?' So, God waves a divine hand, and voilà, everyone’s eternally happy. No pain, no sadness-just perfect, perpetual bliss. But guess what? Someone will still manage to complain: 'How can I believe in a God who allows water puddles that mess up my shoes? and so on. Enough with the irony, I praise the wonderful answer given by John Lennox. God bless him for what is doing to proclaim the gospel.

I’m sure he’s a brilliant mathematician but as a philosopher or a thinker, I’m not so sure. The idea that we need purpose and certainty in our lives is simply a reflection of human weakness. Read Camus’ The Plague and understand the value of a life lived without such childish illusions.

I’m sure he’s a brilliant mathematician but as a philosopher or a thinker, I’m not so sure. The idea that we need purpose and certainty in our lives is simply a reflection of human weakness. Read Camus’ The Plague and understand the value of a life lived without such childish illusions.

Good Morning Thank You for the platform time and effort. Keep up the Good Work. 🙏🏾💓🙌🏾

❤

John needs to read the Bible more carefully as biblical cosmology alludes to a flat stationery earth. Perhaps he is in darkness on this subject because he is an apparent all knowing intellectual. Doesn't the Bible say something about pride? I like that he is a defender of the faith, but he is a bit condescending at times.

So he (Lennox) is saying, we saw, what Atheism brought to Romania, duirng the cold war. Hahaha, this is the biggest, biggest nonsense almost I've ever heard. It was Comunism, not Atheism. Sure that this guy tought in Oxford?

Thank you for putting into words how I feel. Somebody has already said that you put into words what most of us can't. I was baptised at 42 and my faith is very important to me. I thought I may be crazy but my faith has helped me understand so much and still know I know very little your a blessing sir ❤

How does logic go to legitimize the fairy tales of the Middle East that is suoremcist ideology

There is world other than European theicracy

Fascinating. What matters is that “God [spoke into creation (Gk/Aramaic)] the entire universe; not from what is seen, but from what was Unseen.” Hebrews 11.3😊. Praised may His name be … now and forever. 🎸👨🏼‍⚕️. 🫶✌️♾️

that guy doesn't know what is really going in the book. don't buy it. @ladybabylon.

If we could understand the meaning of Nothing, there would be no questions to ask.

This is ridiculous 😂

Blessings,🌿 ❤️‍🔥<=== IN JESUS NAME====€ PSALM 2

Hanging on a pole and suffering for hours is not comparable to living in agony for decades. God is not human and never has been. Christ is not human but a hybrid. They cannot know, know, what it is like to be human. Christ could not be deceived, could not be manipulated, knew the future, knew no doubt, and could perform miraculous acts. No human being can claim the same. Please do not claim that God and Christ "know our pain." They don't because they can't.

Very well put.CS was a true teacher without trying to be.God Bless ⚡

The name "John" means "God is gracious". Indeed, John Lennox is God's gracious gift, not only to Christians but to the world. Thank you for making this video available on RUclips. God bless you.

He takes the false narrative (a.k.a. lie) that men have been to the moon at face value. Basic research into that claim tells us that it is not true.

Most - if not all - flat earthers that I know absolutely believe in God. Indeed, it was researching flat earth that brought them there.

He's pretty good at defending belief in God. But he still gives too much credence to subjects that are labelled as being sciences, but which really aren't.

About declining numbers C S Lewis addressed this years ago. Youth don't know because they aren't told.

That is correct. There is no way to quantify the longest evening. In addition, the first few days were not time slaved to the physical sun because it wasn't made yet. God was the luminary for those first days and he took as much relative time as he desired....a thing we'll never know...and that could have lasted any amount of time as we comprehend it. For all we know, these were 'million' or billion year-long days. They could have been microseconds long. Only God knows. What we are told is that those days were not anchored to the physical sun yet and therefore not restricted to 24 hrs whatsoever.

Nobody DEFINES god as "the god of the gaps." Instead atheists expose the fallacious argument so often invoked by believers to the effect: "you can't explain the origin of the universe, therefore god did it," or "the origin of life," or "the nature of consciousness," or several other major unsolved problems. There have been innumerable cases where that fallacious theistic argument has been made and EVERY time science "closes the gap" the theists retreat to "but you still haven't explained... X... and thus god did THAT." Invalid and OH so boring.

That's right. It tells you absolutely nothing

He said that he couldn’t answer the question so he answered a completely unrelated question that no one asked. What a pompous dumb ass.

John Lennox is right in calling the question of suffering the most difficult at 15:19. It can be asked without the concept of "evil". It is simply the question of suffering and premature death by violence or disease. To me this still shows that there is no God. It is the only answer that I found conclusive to explain what is actually going on in the world. It is true that this leaves no hope beyond our earthly life, but that does not mean I can suddenly choose differently and will myself to believe in a God. It would be nice to have a perspective of life after death, but I think it's just a made up idea without any basis in reality.

Biblical literalism in the West is acting as the main agent behind the decline in the faith. Centuries passed and never has any theologian or a scholar has ever taken each and every statement made in bible as if they were factual beyond reason and logos. Scholars of the faith often emphasized on how the stories of the bible were meant to be a spiritual lesson and not on creation. Most of the better scholars of the past were from the Church and never was the idea of science and religion was against each other have been preached. To this day it amazes me how lessons on faith are transpiring into science and history lessons. We have God to teach us and logos, whom are together, do not seperate them

The light of Christ shines through him.

Monotheism must end

11 For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day.

Amazing that John strongly objects to flat earth in the premise of non believers. Believers hold the perspective of flat earth. Not non believers. Scripture strongly points to aspects of flat earth belief. John has always been much more honest than that. I've honestly never seen John so uncomfortable answering a question as the flat earth question. Believes however that he was poisoned by the Russians during a visit and then found wisdom enough to return and concluded they don't try to poison him anymore. Interesting

What about the relation from the firmament and flat Earth ?

🇷🇴🇹🇩🇹🇩

My faith is not on the age of the earth but in Christ Jesus Himself!!!

Love Dr John Lennox. So gentle and eloquent.

To err is human. To be truly evil, you need religion.

Why is that interesting?

Would "X creates X" in this cosmic schema just be like saying "God(dess) creates Universe and is Always One with it." I feel like this isn't confusing to an intelligent Hindu or Western esotericist. Some of these weird "controversies" appear from outside more like prick measuring contests. Notable, it always seems to involve either some personal, definitely male god OUTSIDE EXISTENCE material or other...or it involves equally bizarre sophirties about gravity making the Universe but there's somehow in place of outside god just a quantifiable void. Or something. Both sides are grasping for something common but insist on putting a heck of a lot of ego-defense and ego-constructs into it. Let's try a thought experiment that may be helpful: Logos is the word or song or frequency reading essences in the wave to resonance. Where is Logos eternally potential? Where did Logos come from? There may already be all the scientific and religious models and allegories/iconographies for this, even in Christianity, where it is strangely obvious but also strained into implausible euhermirazions (worse, these are imposed upon dissected actual histories that I have reason to believe were more miraculous and powerful than soi-disant Christians normally do). Both tracks on these matters seem like they lead to nihilism, one maybe faster than the other, but I've learned even presenting things Socratically to people who've decided on "Christian" or "atheist" and all the nonsense that goes with either oftenmost results in reactions only psychoanalysists seem prepared for. I'm not a therapist so...I'll keep asking and stating things, but the whole programmed mind thing is a bit scary. Psychic malware.

If your god made a global flood and killed all humans then where are the fossils of those humans. Where did all the water go? LMAO