Видео

It may be because your computer might not be compatible with that version. Try to install lower version. Try 2020.3.17.

@@devansh8846 what website do i? "Uptodown" website? I saw some older version of it

Thank you😊

Thanks for watching and sharing the information. 😊

As much as I know, Flightgear is one of the flight simulators that works well in low end pcs. Try to lower your graphics settings to increase performance.

@@devansh8846 played it before it was good but it gets laggy and thank you for the tip to reduce the lag

@@planespotter512 then you can download the older version of it which worked well in your system.

@@devansh8846 im using 20.20.03

Hello

Thanks for watching 😊

Thanks for watching😊

@@devansh8846 welcome

Thanks for watching. Here is the link github.com/franck-vmd/Boeing-777-Flightgear

Thank you so much, mate. Thanks for all your consistent support. 😊

@@devansh8846 :) Welcome

Thank you so much. It would have not been possible without your support and help.😊

Thanks for the info. I try to get established by 500ft in non-precision approach. But this time I couldn't 😅. Even though I continued because the picture looked do-able. I had to do three go-arounds yesterday as I couldn't stabilise myself. I haven't shown that in the video but I do go-around when it is not safe to continue. 😅

Thanks buddy😊

Hello and Thanks 😊

Yes😅

Haha, let's hope so. You have a good day. 😊

I'm glad you liked it. I should have chosen a better airport with more fps. Thanks for watching😊

I have seen that 777's cockpit is of yellowish brown color. But I'm not sure about the 777X. Even though, this looks beautiful! Here is the link for this bird:- github.com/franck-vmd/Boeing-777-Flightgear And Yes, it does have a working switch to fold the wing. As much as I remember, it is situated at lower left of the overhead panel. It also has indication for it on the EICAS. 😊

@@devansh8846 that's great! Yes, the 777 does have a "yellowish brown" color, but the 777X is much similar to the 787. You couldn't really tell the difference between the two if it weren't for some key features, such as "777" printed out on the yoke

Yup! 🤣. For me, what I use and how the graphic of the sim looks doesn't matter much. Sim-ing is all about self discipline and continuous learning. Hope you liked the short. Thanks for watching. 😊

It is Flightgear. It is an open source Free flight simulator. You can download it from its official website. Only for pc. Thanks for watching. 😊

Thanks for watching 😊

Nothing. I wasn't using any inbuilt failures. I was trying to mimic a checkride. I intentionally turned off the engine master switch. Thanks for watching. 😊

Thanks buddy😊

@@devansh8846 Welcome :)

Thank you so much for watching and visiting my channel. MD-11 is a wonderful aircraft. I'll be soon flying it again, without a doubt. Thank you for your consistent hardwork in making flightgear experience better by making such amazing flight models. 😊

@devansh8846 thanks for your kind words!

Thanks for watching. I am glad that you liked the flight. I just google the icao name of the airports + chart and whatever link provides me a pdf, I go for it. Works fine for sim with no atc and traffic.

I have kept that in mind in the upcoming video😊

Hey! Long time no see, mate. Thanks for watching. 😊

I usually use the default approach provided by the route manager whenever I fly in India. There is lack of waypoints and navaids. From my experience, I know, even the ILSs are not align with the runway at most of the airports in India. If I had followed the VOR radial published in the chart, I would have been way away from the runway. There is also no VOR horizontal and vertical guidence available on the pfd like in real aircraft. As per the chart, it is a VOR approach. But in actual, it is a default approach until 6 nm from the runway threshold. Then a continuous descent of 3°, followed by a visual approach. 😅

@@devansh8846 I see... That VOR vertical and horizontal guidance that you're talking about is called V/DEV, and is not only usedwoth VORs, but with all kinds of non-precision approaches

😂

That's cool. A comment right from the cockpit. I can just imagine that. I had no idea how to do it. I just wanted to get the plane down and make it stop on the runway. I was expecting brake overheat light to be illuminated but it didn't happen. I am grateful that Madeira Airport Spotting guy, Pedro, visited my channel. And no problem, take your time. You have a wonderful day and an awesome flight. 😊

Thanks😊

@@devansh8846 Welcome :)

I agree, it was all wrong mostly. Even I knew when I started doing it. When I checked the weather for my destination, I came to know that wind was not in the favour of a precision approach. I could have done a VOR approach. But I took it as an opportunity to try the circling approach because I didn't fly it in a while. I didn't have the chart for Rovaniemi. So, I don't know which side of the airport circling is permissible and at what altitude. I went below my own decided altitude, about 200ft or so. I didn't turn off the FD and LS. After passing the threshold and being 1000ft above the airport altitude, I should have initiated the turn to base at 30 seconds minus 4 seconds for 4 knots of tailwinds. Being honest, I got overwhelmed when doing it. I was also quite unstable on final as well. I will be more than happy and thankful if you tell me the correct procedure. Especially when breaking out/off, how much degree we should turn for how many seconds. I found some of the liveries from here, github.com/Pilot2938/Pilot2938-FG-liveries/tree/master/A320-family

It's Flightgear. Open source free flight simulator for pc. You can download it from it's official website. Thanks for watching😊🙏🏻

Thanks mate😊

@@devansh8846 Welcome :)

Wow! It is an honor to have you on my channel. Thank you so much for watching and giving a lovely feedback. Made my day. 😊