Видео

Only one thing: You forgot Finland. Except that: Very realistic.

Thanks for this video from Brazil 🇧🇷

As a Vietnamese, I wish I could travel back in time to save China and my country from falling to communism.

this is the better history of china

Still waiting 7:15

Didn't South Africa only destabilise after Apartheid ended though, also look at what happened when majority rule was granted in Rhodesia, it didn't result in a prosperous Zimbabwe

3:28, the problem with this map is that the allies had already planned the occupation zones in Germany beforehand, so Germany would look the same, and the Allies would also be unlikely to actually capture Berlin instead of removing the Nazis from their future occupation zones

idk, i think china would be poorer cuz no economic aid from the US, and mao's great leap forward was quite bad early on, but it urbanized china really quick.

Nice world.

If the Nationalists won I doubt they’d go head first into being an American ally. They would get along against communism, but Chinese and American interests in Asia would overlap.

Gotta say, I love your videos, very optimistic!

If Turkey joined the Axis powers, he's first goal will be Resurrecting the Ottoman empire

What if Native americans kickout the anglo saxons? I assumed there will be world peace?

I don't mean to demean or anything but I think there are a few problems 0:47 It's not entirely possible, because there was no "national government" at the time, only cliques full of different regional warlords with no person beside Chiang Kai-Shek in charge. If he were to die, the nation would basically collapse. Many armies would not pledge to invade Tibet nor listen to a central consolidated government, why lose power if you have so much? The only reason it happened in Taiwan is because there was no land to own, however there was even possibility of civil war at this point. So no, even if the government would be completely in one place, it must have had to happen early-1950s at the earliest. 1:31 It is more possible than the prior idea BUT a lot more possible. But if the earlier one fails (90% or more chance), Kai-Shek could only implement it in one area or not even be able to at all. However, even if we assume that it does happen, Taiwan's didn't happen until the 1960s and China is a lot bigger. Peasants supported the CCP but in the Kuomintang, corruption was king, including Chiang Kai-Shek himself. Such reforms couldn't happen until a destruction of corruption, that would take long and centralization of the nation. By the time they can implement it, it would be Deng Xiaoping's time. If Chiang Kai-Shek tries to create economic reforms in the 1950s, Mao also tried and caused huge famines, if Chiang tries, likely the same will happen. 2:55 China may have not caused Viet Nam's creation in the first place, the Ho Chi Minh trail, viet cong and better strategy led to Viet Nam's success. As with the warlords thing, armies may be affected by viet cong insurgents, that they may promise to end if they pledge to not fight. South Vietnam, in all honesty, collapsed on itself, it wasn't really strong enough to exist. 3:00 Around this time, china is centralized and can actually act as one nation, not a warlord confederacy 3:11 Like I said, economic reforms could not have come until ~1979-1981, so it is more likely that there would be supressed economic protests 3:45 Real democratic deforms in China, albeit with a poorer mass now 4:05 Actual Dengist economic reforms take place now 4:07 At 4:05, the earliest time for economic reforms would have occurred. So, if they have happened later at the expected time, then yes I agree with you 4:32 China was never seriously involved in any communist rebellions that brought upon communism (iirc), so I don't think it would change here. Yes, they supported the Rouge in Kampuchea, but it was limited by Communistic Vietnam, so I don't agree with this either. 5:04 Good point, the DPP need not exist due to Taiwan being a small part. If one from our timeline need be in charge, may I suggest Ma Hushan? He was a Kuomintang leader, but executed by the communists during a war. If they won, he wouldn't be executed and could be a potential successor. However, he was not a majority Han and was Kai-Shek's age, so he may not be alive by then. Wang Dan was the leader of the students' protest at Tianamen Square in 1989, a pro-democracy student activist, so of age and pro-democracy Beijinger. Yan Jiaqi, Bao Tang are others, though associated with the CCP, are pro-democracy. 5:24 I disagree with "Maoist disasters," firstly, China was very fractured in the beginning, a unification would cause human, economic and social losses to the nation, economic reforms must've taken place under 1980s, meaning bad economy from the beginning, and agragarian -> industrial change in Taiwan, a small nation WAY smaller than China didn't even change until the 1960s. An average of 3.02-4.1 million died from famines happening every 3-5 years before Mao, and if you take a nation and need to quickly increase the GDP, bad stuff will happen. If Chiang Kai-Shek tries to make economic reforms in the 50s like Mao, he will face similar disasters. So at the maximum, not the bare minimum, it would be the 3rd or really trying, barely 2nd highest, I doubt it, considering how much greater Japan's success was. 6:04 To conclude with my thoughts, I think that despite for the democratic and Hong Kong factors, the ROC's existence in economic and social terms would be pretty similar and equal to the PRC. So thank you for reading my yapology seminar.

H PBM, I lost my discord acc. again. What's yours so can add you?

국민당이 중국대륙을 통일 했다면 한국과 일본은 지금 수준의 경제 , 군사력을 키울수 없었지 . 한국 , 일본 모두 중국에 속국이 되었을 가능성이 높지

Truman is a bug

@patrioticbritishmapper8352 l always thought that Mexico would cede Baja to America if joined the war. Good job sticking to realism with this video. This is realistic, great job

The goodish ending Nice video! Awesome to see that you took my suggestions, and great interpretation of this scenario overall! Mussolini: to get revenge on the allies WE WILL JOIN THE ALLIES!!!!

@patrioticbritishmapper8352 Now we are at actual History Germany countries in the world

Fire music

This would be the only way Taiwan would be united with the mainland as a chinese, i wish i am lived in this timeline

Good video! :P Nice video. l think after WWII Hitler would stabilize and then invade Italy since he wouldn't need allies anymore

Post colonial africa lore is so peak i swear Patriotic British Mapper truly is a Patriotic British Mapper with that voice

nice vids dude

Thanks For this! Love your content! Suggestion: What if Napoleón IV survival and married princess Beatrice?

Nice video. Could you do, What if Austria unified Germany?

3 years later, still a beautiful video! God save the queen/king 🇬🇧 ❤ Edit 1 : whats the song name of the uk anthem at the start of the video?

The ideal timeline

Alternative history hub would have dreamed of this being real l think l prefer this timeline This was very good! Interesting well done!!

Ah yes, the "Morally gray WW2 Germany" ending.

Whites winning is extremely ambiguous and would lead to a lot of outcomes like one of the commenters said, because “Whites” was basically nearly everyone who opposed Reds - from moderate socialists and liberals to monarchists. So it could potentially lead to Social democratic Russia or a liberal Republic or the resurrection of Empire

This is a very good video, but l have just one question. Since France won, why doesn't it take the British colonies in West Africa ?

Hmm might join

@patrioticbritishmapper8352 This is the most sensible alternative history empire scenario of imperial federation, good work !!

Long live the Franco-British UK and France friendship !

Pretty good videos, but the events are too fast man. Keep up the good work!

1900s Presidential timeline if Roosevelt ran in 1908: 26) Theodore Roosevelt 1901-1913. VP 26)Charles W. Fairbanks 1905-1913. 27) Charles Evans Hughes: 1913-1921 VP 27) Herbert S. Hadley 1913-1917 28) Theodore E. Burton. 28) Leonard Wood: 1921-1927 VP 29)Calvin Coolidge 1921-1927. 29) Calvin Coolidge 1927-1933. VP 30) Charles Curtis. 1929-1933. 30) Charles Curtis. (Jan-March 1933). 31)Al Smith 1933-1941 VP 31) John Nance Garner 1933-1941. 32) Thomas E. Dewey (Won in 1938).1941-1949 VP 32) Charles L. McNary 1941-1944 33) John W. Bricker 1945-1949. 33) Earl Warren 1949-1957 VP 34) Harold Stassen (Reelected 1944) became senator in 1946. 34) Harold Stassen. 1957-1965 VP 35) William F. Knowland. 35) JFK 1965-1973 VP 36)Ralph Yarborough. 36) Ronald Reagan 1973-1981 VP 37) Edgar Whitcomb. 37) George H. W. Bush 1981-1989 VP 38)Charles H. Percy. 38) Michael Dukakis 1989-1997 VP 39) Lloyd Bentsen. 39) John McCain 1997-2005 VP 40)John Engler.

The Axis being blue and the Allies being red is so cursed

Make vídeo what if german y won ww2

Atlee was a socialist, it doesn't make sense that he would support colonialism at all A more likely scenario is one where Churchill wins the '45 election and tries to hold on to the empire but even than that results in a much poorer and weaker britain from fighting unsustainable wars for so long

You forgot the economic reforms

Personally, I feel like Theodore’s best shot at being president during WW1 is if he had decided to run for reelection in 1908 and win it. I think he would’ve had to have been still in charge as the first president to win a third term in 1908.

I beleive that instead of being a single country it would be number of countries with similar foreign policy and intregrated defense

good work I subscribe and support you with my free epic music

4:48 why would this be needed if apartheid never existed in this version of history?

The Americans would not make a atomic bomb for a war with Japan

Basically Korea and Vietnam switch place😂

Would the HMHS Britannic still sink in this WW1?

So basically our world is more peaceful