Видео

@@chillbro8811 part of me wants one but I do want the benefits of the GH6. May consider grabbing a Gh7 in the future since it has all the features of both cameras with the added benefit of having a CF express type B

Literally an SD Card speed test. Not sure how much clearer I can make it. Funniest comment ever commented! Thanks for making my day!

Oh man! Totally underrated lens!!! Been meaning to review it!

Hey thanks for watching! I unfortunately do NOT have an EM5 or EM5 II. But if I can find a great deal on one I may try and do some content on one!

Dude YES! There's something inert with film. Something that's not easily describable honestly. Even how the images are MADE is completely different. It's purely a chemical reaction as opposed to an electronic data. The moment that is captured in film shares the exact light and air of that very moment which digital will NEVER be able to copy. As ridiculous as that sounds that's the biggest reason some people are still able to really tell the difference between film and digital.

Well hello!

Hey @HeroVange sorry for the late reply I don't monitor my YT as diligently as I should! With the E-M1 Mark II and Mark III there's nothing you can really do about it. The newest update is actually really terrible from what I remember (I'm primarily a GH6 and Sony A9 shooter now) The ONLY thing I can say is the once of the older firmwares actually a bit better regarding the IBIS. One thing I do have to ask though is you're stating it's also visible on the dinner table? IF it's warping EVEN when you're still THAT is a possible problem with the IBIS itself! Sorry I couldn't be of better assistance!

Heck yea! Come skate with me one of these days!

My statement was simply none of that matters as much as everything around the camera. Use anything because everything else is what makes it "cinematic" not the camera.

@@AlpacoFilms The title of the video claims that “full frame is not cinematic.” If that’s true, then what exactly is considered cinematic? A full frame sensor can produce cinematic images just as well as Super 8mm, Super 16mm, Super 35mm, Super 65mm, IMAX, MFT, and other formats. Equipment is as important as skill, non is more than the other.

Exactly. You're literally just strengthening my statement. There's movies made with all types of sensor and film sizes. None of of those sizes mattered. Cinematic is the everything combined to create the story. Not sure why you're trying to argue with me here. We seem to see the same thing. I have a GH6 and an FX3. They serve different purposes. No, cropping the FX3 doesn't work out well it degrades the footage too much. That's where the GH6 works best as I have S16 vintage lenses I like using. But yea my statement isn't against full frame. Its simply stating it's not the end all be all that every RUclipsr that doesn't even work in the industry think it is. It's fantastic looking but so is every other frame size and dimension depending on the story and how you make it.

​@@AlpacoFilms I’m not arguing, just pointing out the fallacy in your statement. You claim “Full frame is NOT Cinematic,” yet also say that equipment is unimportant and any sensor can achieve a cinematic look. This contradicts your initial statement. If any sensor can be cinematic, that includes full frame. Therefore, your argument seems to be against the importance of equipment, not specifically full frame.

@ yea the title of the video is just the title. Made to grab the attention to click. But if you watch it I clearly state that the equipment outside of the camera has a much more important aspect of bringing the look to a scene. The direction and acting is much more important to bring the emotional part of the story. I am simply arguing cameras do not mean nearly as much as RUclips makes it out to be. There's clearly a lack of writers in the camera world when that is clearly the backbone of cinema. This is of course because I consider myself a writer first and hate how writers are treated in the world of filmmaking.

He definitely has a great video. Still highway robbery taking another company's item, redressing, updating firmware for it, and charging $1000 more than the company that made it.

That's awesome!

It truly is!

That is frustrating. I'm not really sure why they limited that function but there's no way to go beyond that in auto iso. Quick question though, are you trying to shoot at higher ISO in daylight? or is your camera randomly choosing 6400 iso in broad daylight but you want to shoot at a lower ISO?

@@AlpacoFilms yes my camera randomly chooses 6400 iso when it gets a bit less lightly, like often it won't go lower it just sets it to max iso idk why. i'd like to shoot on lower iso, for now i try to shoot on P mode as i can't seem to change iso at all in auto mode.... but i like auto mode otherwise so yes it is frustrating :(

Yea, I HAVE to carry a camera everyday. It really is therapeutic as well!

In terms of dynamic range yes. Sharpness NO. OM1 Prores RAW is line skipped and that definitely effects the image quality.

@@AlpacoFilms Thanks for your statement. It surely helps.

yea for sure! I prefer having a camera as well. Regarding the phone footage itself there's apps that soften the footage up and actually the newer iphones have even better dynamic range so they can actually look a lot better than my phone footage.

Infinity is not gone since there's no other element in the adapter. But AF is very slow and sometimes does not hit focus depending on the camera. Just to note. Only Single AF will work and NOT continous AF.

You're welcome! I'm glad it is worth watching!

The actual selfie camera is not as wide as the wide camera on the back of the phone. If you have an Apple Watch you can see and control your camera that way. Doing this will allow you to take a better photo using the better camera sensor and lens combo vs the selfie camera and lens. But the selfie one isn't too bad on the 15 so that's up to you. I'd test and play with it.

Heck yea! Thanks dude!

I'm happy you find it useful! Thank you for watching!

Sorry for the late reply! I don't go on YT as much anymore! Regarding using the Ninja V with the OM-1. It is still only 8-bit 422 like the E-M1 Mark II, E-M1 Mark III, and E-M1X. So it'll only be 8-bit in a 10bit container. However it IS 422 instead of 420. But that's not something that you notice very much. I've ran several tests while I had the OM-1. I was going to do a video regarding that but I've taken on a lot more jobs over the last couple years and I've slacked a bit here.

@@AlpacoFilms Ya I was hoping that the ninja could alleviate the restrictions OM has place on the video recording. They didn’t make any improvements in this regard with the mark ii version. Its a shame because with a few software tweaks this camera could be pretty solid for video.

@@MattParson which I don't understand why they wouldn't just do it. This could've easily beat the G9ii in every category if it just added everything the GH5ii had for video. It actually does raw in 444 not just 422. So it's closer to quality in cinema cameras in the $10,000 range. My FX3 and FX6 doesn't even do that. It had more DR in raw than my GH5s in raw. However it was line skipper and disgustingly noticeable.

Yea, that's the most irritating issue to me. The Panasonic cameras have ALL had AF working with the Metabones and other Speedboosters. Now that they have Hybrid AF the Autofocus works as well and sometimes better than RF Canon mount cameras with EF lenses. I think this has a lot to do with it not being JUST a hybrid but years of them using DFD that it just works well now. Hell, my buddy got the G9II and it really is the stickiest camera I've ever played with. More so than the OM-1 when I had it, however, I had it early on so I'm not sure how the experience is with that camera and the most recent firmware. I can say though is the G9ii works well even WITH EF lenses as that's what my buddy was using. He didn't even use a Canon EF lens. He was using a Sigma 50-100 f1.8 and it was pretty good with that old hunk of glass!

@@AlpacoFilms I use the metabones on my Oly Pen F and it gets the job done for taking photos with my Canon mount lenses. A Pen F with modern feature set would be great but I doubt OM would make it because they’ve gone all in on Wildlife photo market. But we’ll have to wait and see

@@MattParson they have and completely dismissed their whole thing about honoring Maitani. The M in OM is now meaningless.

Completely agree, I LOVE LOVE Super 16, I use a clip of Fruitvale Station in my video around the 1:15 mark. I actually own a bolex reflex H16 myself and I still obsess over the original Blackmagic Cinema Camera as that was my favorite Cinema camera I've ever owned even to date (even after having to deal with 5 of them as they were not very reliable cameras). I typically don't even shoot 10-bit for clients anymore. Most can't tell the difference since it resides on Social Media anyway so no VFX needed. There's films shot on 8-bit Canon C100's that still look amazing today. So much so that I'm itching to buy one for a film I'm shooting later this year. But I'll probably end up using the GH6 instead as MFT is the closest to a modern S16 I'll get. Not to mention the features really do make it a HECK of a lot easier to shoot a movie. Thanks again for watching and sorry for the late reply, I don't really do YT anymore. Might consider picking it up again sometime but unsure of that decision as of yet.

I love the Blackmagic cameras! I would have gone that route if I didn't need to take photos. But, NOW I actually have the GH6 as it's basically everything I want out of the BMPCC4k which the addition of a more compact and functional body, Opengate (which is my primary recording preference for work as we shoot for Social Media a lot), a purely photo mode, and also the fact that it's build like a TANK! Seriously, I've dropped it on rocks at the side of a steep ridge and it's completely fine.

Sorry for the late reply, I don't go on RUclips as often anymore. But, since it's RAW, you can literally use ANY of the RAW conversions. Or do what I do, I made my own LUT in FCPX (or whichever NLE you're using) I made one for 5500K, 4000K, 3000, and 2500K white balances so I have all the ranges. BUT since it's RAW, you can change the white balance in FCPX very easily. With RAW, the world is your oyster...or however the saying goes.

I love a lot of vintage lenses, but some have grown to some ridiculous prices! I also really love the cheaper chinese manual focus lenses as they use a lot of the same chemical formula as the vintage lenses. But you have the advantage of having lenses that are closer designed for your size sensors and some are cheaper than the vintage lenses. For example I know TTArtisans lenses uses similar techniques as the knock off Canon FD lenses (Brand name is Five Star) which I actually love more than the FD lenses and some of the FD lenses were used in Cinema Glass.

Well dang, I guess good things come to an end...I don't own or run the site. It was ran by someone else of their own time and money.

Hey David, as far as I know. 6400 is the MAX limit for Auto even in photos. Not sure why to be quite honest. But I'm only speaking for the E-M1 Mark II. I no longer have the Mark III. However, I do not see that this would be different for the Mark III as the firmware updates weren't nearly as great as the Mark II was.

It's strange isn't it? The BTS videos outperform the actual short films/features? And when you see these technical "filmmakers" "films" they're poorly written, horribly paced, and have nothing to say or add. It's incredible to me that it's what's passing for "films" now. It's illiteracy in storytelling.

No problem! And hey we are E-P siblings! My daily carry is a E-P3

@@AlpacoFilms Nice! Love how these older cameras are still so much fun to use.

@@steve5746 right! And in a lot of ways the older look and colors are so rich and characteristic! The newer cameras seem to follow more of Sony's path of a clinical look.

i can't access lightsnowdev, is it down?

Totally respect your views on this camera. I made this last year so a lot of it doesn't apply anymore. Especially now that the camera is easily purchased at a lower price with sales they throw throughout the year. I still experience the same things in real life practices. Most people don't actually use the features. But my opinion of the OM-5 has definitely changed. Here in Florida, it is still not very high selling. Again I do marketing for several camera stores and they simply do not sell OM-5 as well as other cameras. Great for OM for selling well in other countries though! Regarding the body, I've not heard of the frame being made of magnesium. I'll have to contact my rep I work with at OM to get that detail. But I'm more than sure it's the same template as the previous E-M5 which is not made of magnesium at all. I definitely do not agree with your sentiment about plastics/polycarbonate being tougher than metals. I've experience a lot of drops from high places (rock climbing, hikes, and bouldering) with both materials and my Olympus e-m1 mark II and lasted years of abuse. If that sentiment were true, the OM-1 would be made of Polycarbonate as well. But it's not.

You either, have been misinformed or wildly guessing at the specification of the OM-5 assembly. There is no sub-frame to speak of, let alone a magnesium alloy one. The internal components are modular and are affixed to the main shell (camera body) with small alloy and plastic brackets. The body shell is precision moulded and identical to the previous model with one variation; added material to the tripod socket anchor. The body shell is a high quality plastic but certainly not glass filled, which is would create significant problems with precision moulding and have no tangible benefit whatsoever. The plastic shell does have a premium feel however, reduces some weight overall and reduces production costs. It is completely fit for purpose and very strong but ultimately less robust than alloy variants.

It's a great camera! I just went through a few problems with it but I've heard a lot of people not experiencing the same problems I am!

Forgive me if some of this is wrong. I'm working only through memory and I no longer have E-M1 Mark III and OM-1 to test. From what i remember with ProRes RAW, you can't trigger recording on the camera at all. You can ONLY record by hitting the record button on the Ninja V. Regarding recording, have you tried this? ruclips.net/video/Kf7uRBJbvHQ/видео.htmlsi=DwW1-3U22EdaJ0_c&t=46

I think all the Olympus/OM cameras video is line skipped. I didn't actually realize this until recently (i guess months ago at this point) though. I don't have that much of a problem with it for online content creating it's more than fine. It's just something to note. I realized this when I was able to play with my buddies OG GH5 and even at the lowest codec the video was more detailed overall looked better. But again, not enough to make that big of deal for online content!

Yea it really does, but it isn't any hotter than any other external monitors I have so I just assumed this was normal.

Exactly! I couldn't of said it better.

Thanks, dude. It really shouldn't be about the size of the sensor. It's everything around it that makes the film. Without a good story, good lighting, and dedicated actors/actresses and production. The film will suffer. No matter the size of the sensor.

Thank you for you comments, itseasy to relay on the dynamic range and depth of field of Full frrame, personaly unless you have a focus puller that can work with FF its kind of pointless. Furthermore as you have indicated if the lighting isn't considered then it doesn't matter frankly what you shoot on. Even an Imax camera for instance shot against a white background is still a white background regardless. Cameras made today aren't the problem its the application of production values that creates the image. @@AlpacoFilms

@@stevenwyatt1670 exactly! Its good to hear from others about stuff like this! It gets lost in all the fluff and marketing!

I thought about editing it when I made it but the whole point wasn't against Full Frame. The point is none of that matters, sensor size doesn't dictate if something is cinematic.

@AlpacoFilms i consider little things like this to be Easter Eggs rather than mistakes. Just to test if we're listening.

Yea I get it, I posted this video hours after the rumor posted. Yea it's based on the sport model. Doesn't change the fact it's a full frame lenses that cost nearly a $1000 more than the sigma version. If they needed someone to write the code for it work with dual stab, give me the base code of the lens and I bet I could figure it out.

Glad you enjoyed it! Thanks for watching!

This is so true! Thanks for sharing!

Thank you! I really appreciate this!

I'd recommend the G9ii. It's cheaper and has all the main features for most photographers. Plus, I don't see Panasonic going anywhere for the foreseeable future.

You're very welcome!