Apologize To The Cop, Or Be Jailed For Contempt Of Court
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 июн 2024
- ChuckDefense.com/James
/ cantonpd
Send videos you'd like to see featured on the channel to Realjamesfreeman@gmail.com
Want to help me travel to more locations?
cash.app/$jamesfreemanmedia
www.paypal.me/jamesfreemanmedia
The videos on this channel are for the purposes of education, reporting, and entertainment, and should not be considered legal advice.
FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.
If anything, the cop should apologize for being a dick.
He is what he eats.
CORRECT! THE COP COMMITTED A CRIME. STANDING IN FRONT OF A VEHICLE TO PREVENT IT FROM MOVING IS A CRIME.
Narcissists are physically unable to apologize. Their body locks-up.
Should be fined and jailed for unconstitutionally prolonged detention. He was trying to get this guy to drive in a way he could claim was endangering him. There’s no other reason to place himself ahead of the car after delivering the ticket and stating the driver is free to go.
that was my instinctive thought also! if anything the cop has cited him for a false violation, then pouring salt on his wounds by provoking the driver bc he believed qualified immunity makes him bullet proof. hence the provocative misconduct.
Sue the judge for violating his 1st Amendment Rights.
You would think you should be able to do that, but you absolutely cannot, it will not happen.
File judicial misconduct charges.
@@Welderman007You are correct. Judges are protected by judicial immunity. They are not held accountable for anything they do.
@@kennybachman35 Yes, that always works out good when we have government investigate themselves.
@@Welderman007 You're dead wrong. this man can charge the Judge criminally, name the crimes, and monetary damages, and THEN sue him under a civil rights violation under color of whatever the Judge thinks he is and ISN'T. We are the Masters, THEY are the servants, and they are TASKED with protecting our Rights, not violating them, and when they DO violate our Rights, they violate their OATH OF OFFICE. Which makes them not only criminals, but traitors!
Hey Judge, if YOU don’t publicly admit what you did in court was wrong and apologize to Reginald, over a million of us will make sure your reputation is absolutely trashed and non stop complaints until you are no longer a judge. This is disgusting.
The judge needs six months in general population.
He would have to PC out of PC.
I think he should be shipped off to North Korea.
that judge is a pile of garbage and should be forced to apologize to Reggie and then removed from the bench.
With the threat of going to jail if he doesn't apologize in writing to Reggie!
Removed from the US.
@@johnwesley256🤪
Abolish Judicial immunity
Finally we have a winner! Everyone harps about QI, but it's these judges that are driving all these buses.
Abolish all immunity.
@@robwiljas This. It's mind-blowing that anyone has immunity so they harm others and get away with it.
@@robwiljasyes sir! 🫡
*Abolish the legal system crime ring.
The judge and the Cop are too EMBARRASSED to comment..They tried to make a fool out of this Man and he did not BOW DOWN!!!😡
The Corrupt Judge should be disbarred for misconduct.
The cop should be charged for impeding his free movement since the traffic atop was over once he got the ticket.
Yup. Clearly established.
Judicial immunity is a huge enabler of criminal behavior. They need to be held to a higher standard, not lower.
@@williamshelton4318 I agree, but they can also affect far more people. Our private prison systems have made many of them filthy rich, on the backs of many.
Look at Judge Sharon Holmes! Ron Durbin exposed that tyrant and she is now trying to get him DISBARED!
FEDS need 👀 on The Corrupt Sharon Holmes
Who will hold them to that standard?
The government of which they are part?
Or the people who have no access to the criminal justice system and very limited access to the civil system?
No one will hold themselves accountable, stop being so naive and silly.
Answer this question, who can charge a crime? Who can prosecute a crime?
The answer is, NOT YOU, only the state can charge and prosecute a crime. Only the criminal organization can prosecute criminals.
Are you seeing the fundamental problem.
Asking the fox to punish himself if the chickens he is guarding get eaten by himself.
Doesn't work in theory, doesn't work in practice, stop expecting it to work and stop asking the criminals to police themselves.
Who will hold them to any standard of they are the authority on authority?
You? Lol. Right. No one will. They will pay lip service. They will put on a show, give the illusion that there is justice and equality. But you have to be pretty naive to believe that and still see the reality all around you.
Immunity isn't just given to the government by the government in doctrine. Immunity exists because you have no authority over your servants. Some judges are elected, some appointed.
You might have some control with your vote but even that is highly questionable.
We have a judicial system for the purpose of providing a fair, impartial and consistent application of laws. To create faith and belief in the system in order to prevent vigilante and mob justice becoming the way of the land.
But once the impartiality is gone, once the fairness ceases, once the faith and belief fade, there will be only vigilante justice.
You could completely remove all immunities and nothing would change really. All that would allow would be for civil suits to occur.
But still you need the court to hear the case, you need standing in a timely manner with remedy obvious and possible from the court.
Your case is not ripe in the spring, you lack standing, latches in summer and moot by fall.
The point being, there is always an excuse, always a way to deny justice even in civil litigation if you rely entirely upon the state for justice.
Why not allow the victim access to a grand jury. If the Grand jury indicts, let the victim decide to prosecute or not and let the state/ the people pay for the prosecution just as we pay for every single criminal prosecution already?
We can use the system if we have access to it, if we have equal protection under the law.
Otherwise we are subject to begging the state to prosecute state agents for criminal acts.
We are asking the criminal gang to prosecute their own for "we the victims".
Shockingly, this is exactly what we get. No accountability, no criminal prosecution and denied any civil remedy because of self created, self declared immunity.
Judicial immunity was not given to the courts, it was created by the courts and given to every public employee. From your town hall janitor up to the Vice President.
The only immunity that arguably exist Constitutionally might be presidential immunity and diplomatic immunities.
Everything else was created by the government for the government in direct conflict with The Declaration of Independence and The United States Constitution.
The criminal created immunity for themselves and you see that immunity as enabling the criminal?
Well no kidding but immunity did not come first, the crime came first, the criminal came before the crime, immunity was the result of criminality not the cause of criminality.
There would be no need for immunity if the criminals did not commit crimes.
Immunity protects from consequences it doesn't enable the act. Power and authority enable the acts. Immunity is a symptom people fixate on because they want to see others suffer. If they wanted to stop the crimes, prevent the violations they would remove the power and authority, make prosecutions mandatory for violations under color of law.
Instead they focus on immunity that really only applies to civil litigation not so much to criminal liability.
Civil litigation against a state agent puts the individual plaintiff against the entire system backed by all of our resources and holding all the power.
Criminal prosecution puts the entire system and all of our resources against the individual who commits the crime.
You want immunity removed so an individual can take on the system but you seem to ignore what a mismatch that is. You seem to ignore the criminal aspect of liability, deterrence and accountability that every other person faces.
You want protections removed but ignore the power that is being abused to commit the acts.
Fine, remove this judge today. Tomorrow a new face will take their place and have the exact same powers to commit the exact same crimes with the exact same liabilities.
The judge won't pay the awarded judgement if and when one is gotten.
The state, we the people, will pay the judgement on behalf of our servant who caused harm abusing our power on our behalf.
That would be the best case scenario if immunity was abolished.
And it should be.
But it won't actually fix the underlying problems. In my opinion.
Just thoughts
@@eshootziscrs2868 I guess my main point was to try and remove the temptations. Your point is it won't change anything. I won't argue that, but wish it were different and vent about it. A lot of good that does.... Naively, I still think public servants need to actually serve the public and not themselves. Fat chance I know.
@@treborheminway3814
You're definitely not wrong. I think there is a bigger picture with deeper roots.
We do would do well if we could actually hold our servants to any standard but we have very little power or recourse with which to do so.
Immunity is definitely a blockade to accountability.
This judge can’t remain in his position legally, absolutely unconstitutional
Judicial immunity is why!! When no one in government is held accountable here we are 🤮
That judge needs locked up.
How DARE he violate the rights of the citizens and the LAW!!!
Judges have too much power!!!
@@NutnboujeeIs it time for vigilante retribution yet?!
Why
@@coffeepeachesplans The judge violated federal law. 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law.
Clear conspiracy to deprive rights under color or crap .
Judge should be prosecuted for terroristic threatening.
Exactly! The judge threatened to take away this man's freedom for absolutely nothing. Perhaps the judge will do this to the wrong person and when they get out they will be his karma. For some people, if they feel the punishment, then they will commit the crime.
THE JUDGE NEEDS TO BE DISBARRED OR HE WILL DO IT AGAIN!!! THE COP NEEDS TO BE FIRED AND NEVER TO BE A COP AGAIN, AND 60 DAYS IN JAIL FOR THE CRIME HE COMMITTED.
What about the next face, and the one after that....
Maybe it's not a problem with individuals but a systemic problem with the system.
You do realize the judge committed felony crimes against the victim and the people.
But you don't want equal protection under the law for all, you want the judge disbarred while anyone else would be criminally prosecuted.
Why don't you want the judge prosecuted, convicted and sentenced for his crimes?
Interesting.
Judges need to be held accountable just like everyone else !
Still waiting for an apology from Uvalde cops.
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
That will never happen.
Texas rewarded Uvalde cops
@@ano1962 and that's the second reason we need second amendment, and 2 be able to carry openly. You can't depend on you damn sure can't trust them cuz they lie, and they're never there when you need them
Btw who ended that threat? I thought it was like special forces or something
The case was dismissed because the judge forgot free speech was a constitutional right. He needed EVERYONE on all platforms to remind him...........
He didn't forget.
He's been doing this since his first day
It was dismissed because he didn’t think it would go global/viral and he got caught.
@@MartintheTinman 💯 %! 😉 Unbias
He and the Cop are dribbling twats. I guess they are going to hunt me down and force me to apologize for my insult.
This man should still sue the chit out of this judge for his abuse of power. God knows I would be.
“. . . I have nothing but contempt for every single court in the United States of America.”
VERY WELL SAID!
This is the city where I got a $350 ticket for cussing a game warden. Instead of getting an attorney, I contested the ticket so the game warden had to repeat every foul and disgusting thing I called him in open court. It turned into a laugh fest and the judge(not Bull) reduced the fine to $25. It was worth it and, if I ever see "little princess" again, I'll give him part two of my Navy vernacular.
😅😂👏👍😅
💯💯💯
Should have argued ANY fee...It's ALL protected speech under Federal Case law
The judge should spend the rest of his life in prison for this. He's done this before and he knows that's not legal yet still thinks he can get away with it.
💯
Judges and prosecutors are pretty much untouchable You cannot Sue them. They illegally prosecute and convict people all the time and are almost never held responsible. They have judicial immunity
which allows this to happen. It's a pretty sweet system they have set up for themselves to not be responsible for their actions.
The prosecutor of the duke lacrosse fake rape case only has to serve 1 day in countyjail for his illegal acts.. the family court judge who illegally entered a mans home andlet his ex wife rifle thru his personal items. Was thrown off the bench and he has sucessfully sued her in federal court. Those are the only 2 examples i know of were even a little action was taking against these tyrants.@@Welderman007
Because he can. This will blow over and he will keep doing it.
Unfortunately he does get away with it all too often 😣
Never apologize to a thug with a badge and gun and a big ego
That woman has to believe that "Cussing a cop " is an illegal act. never the less she is believeing a LYING JUDGE. Bless her little heart
As a yankee,id like to join in and bless her heart too.
first. it doesn't matter that he DA and judge 'backed off' making him apologize. he needs to sue them for the threat in the first place. as the threat of punishment is all it takes for a violation to happen. and try to get that judge's immunity removed and sue him personally... bankrupt him.... AND have him removed from the bench. a JUDGE SHOULD KNOW that the 1st Amendment protects his speech and NEVER should have required him to apologize.
Second, I'd sue the cop for harassment for his behavior for 1. extending the traffic stop by refusing to move away from the vehicle to allow him to leave after it was over... that's a violation of the 4th Amendment according to the Supreme Court on 'extending traffic stops'.... 2. it HAD to be the cop that reported that he cussed during the traffic stop in order to further get him into trouble because he KNEW that the DA and that Judge were blue line boot lickers and probably have done this kind of shit before... that's a violation of his 1st Amendment by trying to stifle his Free Speech by using the DA and the Judge to do the dirty work for him...
This judge should be disbarred, and all this court case is relooved at by an independent organization
relooved WTF is that?
Doing 28 in a 25mph zone. The stop was ridiculous in the first place.
99% of stops are pretextual. The pull over is to see what they can find
I don't believe a word the cop said. The cop lied about him going 28. It's ridiculous to believe that the cop got behind him, hit cruise control at 28 and then hit the lights.
The judge needs to be held accountable for violating someone's Constitutional Rights, free speech judge! He should be ashamed of himself!
The Judge should apologize to us "WE THE PEOPLE"! Shame SHAME!
Props to this brave man for standing on his rights! Three miles over the speed limit that he couldn’t even prove???
The judge should be in prison. If the 1st amendment isn't "clearly established law" then nothing is.
In my mind, it is not "Clearly Established" when they authorize locking you up for months in coercive detention until they get their coveted "conviction". I spoke with one prisoner who had been fighting bogus charges who had spent over a year in the local jail. They know how to fatigue you into "compliance" since they know they no longer need "the consent of the governed". The quid pro quo relationship between cops and courts is clearly establishing a religion of "we say so with the "cuz law". What is the Cuz law? Just cus. Arbitrary power in protected municipalities always gets buried under a sea of obfuscation.
When she asked why it was any of your business. I would have asked her if The first amendment is a state law or a constitutional law. The fact that someone would even fix their lips to ask why someone should be concerned that a judge thinks he has the right to compel the speech of another American is quite pathetic
What punishment does the judge get for trying to violate constitutional rights?
If people actually stood up and held him accountable then he could get the opportunity to water the tree of liberty........
He walks away with full pension! That's the reality of it all.... 😔
Promotion to scotus
Reading one of John Whiteheads post this morning, he summarized how the government likes to come up with their own labels describing personal behavior and conduct of others. But if we identify them openly knowingly and willingly destroying the lives, liberty or property of strangers, there is a financial incentive behind it. To label them as communist, pirates and scoundrels may to much too generous in some of the "memory holed" cases.
The judge for this case is as dumb as a log, he needs to be disbarred immediately before violating more people's constitutional rights and costing the taxpayers to payout for lawsuit for his shameful display of bootlicking and unconstitutional order.
You got that right James, if they’re not hiding anything, release the body cam.
I LIVE IN ALABAMA, THERE IS NO PROTECTED SPEECH HERE, IF YOU WANT FREE MONEY AND BIG LAWSUITS , I ENCOURAGE AUDITORS TO COME HERE.
Sounds like YOU have some work to do
The case may be dropped but it is NOT forgotten. That judge and that cop will get that man no matter how long it takes.
😢👆👎👎
Typical justice system.
3 mph over the speed limit? Story should stop right there.
Thought the same thing.... joke...
Black only applied law.
So so dangerous. I bet he didn't even wear his mandatory strap around his chest while he was driving. Thinking about how many lives were put into danger
@@rafaelA9781it's called the JUST-US system so sad 😢😢😢
Don't say only. I been ticketed for going less than 3 over.@@rafaelA9781
Imagine having a badge, gun, qualified immunity, a public funded attorney, and courts biased in your favor. How would you act?
The judge should get written up and actually disciplined. He violated his oath big time.
Bodycam footage is public records. It belongs to the people. To hold it back should be just illegal!
It is but they will drag it out in court with no repercussions to them.
Judge tried to rub his nose in it.
Three miles over the speed limit was ridiculous in the first place! Sounds like a fishing exhibition!
There is a town in he state where I live that had cops who wrote citations for one MPH over the limit if the sign was passed even though slowing down. I was stopped for one over and as I was being lectured, a semi busting the limit went past in the opposite direction. The cop threw my stuff in my lap, went back to the patrol car, did a U-turn and went after the truck. If I could have found the driver of the truck, I would have bought him a steak dinner.
Sounds like a corrupt judge! 🤦🏻♀️
So now judges can compel someone to lie?
"I have to say sorry or go to jail...so, sorry, I guess".
🤣best comment
Yes, it would be illegal under 18USC1001, but they cut out a special exemption for judges in section b
This isn't serving and protecting or judging fairly or impartially. It's, "Bow down to my massive authoritarian ego and kiss my ring ........or else!"
The church created law, lawyers, so you are absolutely correct.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS LEGAL. THE COP PREVENTING THE DRIVER FROM TRAVELING IS A CRIME, THE JUDGE IS VIOLATING THE DRIVER'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IS A CRIME.
Forcing someone to write such a "letter of apology" is a very clear breach of the First Amendment. Freedom of speech does not only mean that you can freely express any opinion you want without punishment, but it also means that you can't be forced to say what you don't want to say, or face punishment, ie. compelled speech.
And the judicial madness continues!
Taxes and tyranny nullifies the American dream, and freedom
This Judge and The Officer both need to lose their Jobs and NEVER AGAIN WORK IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THE JUSTICE SYSTEM!! Such an abuse of the System!!!
100% AGREE !!!
Remove the judge. This is judicial abuse! He has a right to remonstrate.
" *RESPECT* *MY* *AUTHORITAY* " 🤬
The judge should write a apology letter or face 10 days
Bravo! James thanks for reporting this to we the people. Kudos to Reggie for standing for his (and all of our) rights against the criminal blue line thug/gang members who have qualified and/or judicial immunity.
The judge and cop should be in jail.
Accountability went out the window the moment the public was forced to pay by government.
Let’s go voluntary
I bet Alabama has some sort of Judicial review board who might be interested in hearing about this rogue judge. Kudos to that man for standing up for his rights. Your bravery in standing up for yourself helps all of us everywhere.
I stopped reading at “Alabama”
Sure they would. Right after they go out to lunch with the judge.
Yeah they wouldn’t want to create a precedent that would harm their own industry
Sounds like this judge doesn’t believe in the first amendment. I think this judge should go to jail for a month to think about what freedom of speech and the right to redress grievances actually means. Absolutely disgusting.
Let's support This man anyway we can he is taking a stand.
❤ you James, Right the judge needs to apologize to everyone and resign.
Now it’s time to sue them sue that judge
Google judicial immunity
If there is no equality, then there is no justice. NO ONE should get immunity from bad acts. When do we pesky taxpayers ever get immunity in real life?
This judge is a great example of the huge problem caused by the go along to get along crowd. They have bowed to the self-appointed authority of these people to the point they just expect it. Its a blow to their ego anytime someone questions it or stands on their rights. They dont know or care about the law because they have never had to. People really need to wake up.
The police and the courts invoke the sorcery of "magical thinking" that the rest of the 4th amendment is supplanted by "probable cause, reasonable suspicion, suspicious behavior and more specious excuses to justify the unjust. Like bubbles in a boiling pot, they rise to the top, do their damage and disappear almost as quickly as they attack, all in real time. When it comes to a rigged game, stranger danger is not just a wayward expression, I cannot deny the anxiety I experience when police present a clear and present danger, and the neighbors just bleat Oh well.
Utterly ridiculous
Paul Harvey is a Legend!!
I agree. Everyone should read Paul's " If I were the Devil" and then everybody would see where we are today.
I heard someone say his tagline a few years ago, and I actually found a couple of videos on here and around.
That was a nice conversation you had with that lady, James. Even tho I love it when your interactions call for you having to be a little spicy 😂 I like it even more when you naturally resort to being polite and respectful, in about five seconds you took that lady from “no comment” to a full-on 10 minute conversation 😂
I love how you call out judicial misconduct and out of control judges.
Yours , Mine , and the Truth … That will always put the guy telling the truth at a serious disadvantage…
I think the judge was right **cough** and we as caring community should all go stand outside his home to let him know how much we care....
That poor lady at the end was so close to the truth, but her cognitive dissonance wouldn’t let her. she would say I don’t understand why they wouldn’t release the body camp footage lol bless her little heart
Would be a shame if someone took justice into their own hands
“I’m just a regular guy” who is able to get people to talk (and talk and talk) even when they say “no comment” 3 times.
Well done James ..... A great discussion with that woman.
When will the insanity stop???
In Alabama...never
When the citizens create their own justice system
Using the 2nd to protect the 1st
I’m glad to see people are brushing up on the first amendment… now let’s take a look at that second one, hmmmm.
Great conversation with her. It's everyone's business when peoples rights are abused no matter what state. Interesting story
This judge is a disgrace and should know the constitution better than the man in the street. The fact that he doesnt speaks volumes about him. He is a disgrace to the bench and needs to be disbarred and if not stripped of his judicial immunity. What a clown
West Virginia constitutional lawyer helped get a judge censored ejected whatever you want to call it, she no longer has a job😅
The judge, in my case, was so old and senile he said if I don't pay the fine, they'll suspend my license. I was charged with driving on a suspend license.
When we were kids ,a buddy got busted on his 4 wheeler and got a ticket.
Went to court and paid it.
Got a license suspension notice 2 months later because of a screwup at the courthouse.
Oh, did I mention he was like 15 at the time?
Do I even have to ask, how do you suspend a license when they arent old enough to have one?
I'm sure they have a way ,they always do.
Never apologize to a government employee. delete lawz apologized to the cop in court and the judge still put him in jail.
This violates his first amendment right of freedom of speech, his first first amendment right to redress the government for his grievances, his 5th amendment right against compelled speech, and his 8th amendment right against unusual punishment.
Like Roaches, when you shine the light, they take to the hills
FT JUDGE and the cop
Now, the judge needs to write a letter of apology to the victim.
*NOT A POLITICIAN IN SIGHT*
These types of cases will become more and more common. The DA's and judges will retaliate on behalf of the police departments. The more people that stand up for their rights, the more this will happen.
It's been going on forever. Social media and proliferation of video recording is the only reason we get any justice now. 2 tier system across the board and it has nothing to do with race
Judge needs to be disbarred for his blatant violations of the first amendment protection of free speech. This Judge should know better, his failure to uphold the constitution, and his demonstrated willful disregard for this guy's rights shows clear cause to disbar him. Give him a taste of his own medicine, I'm sure he'll want to apologize for his willful disregard for violating this guy's rights. But that's not good enough. Make him find other career opportunities, because he's unfit for his current position! The simple fact he was willing to demand the apology letter under threat of deprivation of freedom is appalling, and needs a remedy like disbarrment to send a message that it won't be tolerated! This bullshit immunity for people who demand compliance and enforce law with convictions with fines,or imprisonment, need these same consequences for their unlawful actions, how else will they learn. That's how they justify punishing us! Why is or should it be any different for them!
This is why free speech application of media is so important
0yyVeyy you can't offend our poIicy enforcers!
the judge needs to apologize and learn the law.
What a perfect ending to your cordial conversation with that magistrate. Well done my friend and thank you so much for all your time and effort.
The lady instructed to say no comment didn't know when to stop talking if she is truly giving no comment.
James ❤❤❤❤
It gives me a small amount of hope when i see local news outlets highlight such situations.
Notice how the reporter was afraid the man would be targeted by his local police.
They know police are unaccountable, yet they won't spend any time addressing it aside from the stray, out of the ordinary story.
The judges and polices refusal to release the bodycams or make a statement is the administration of guilt to me. When government refuses to be transparent it is because they are attempting to hide their wrongdoing
Excellent video James! The fact that the nice lady thinks it should only be an issue for the people of her state to deal with speaks volumes.
Using the color of law to chill free speech, bad job judge.
That white lady on the phone was fantastic.
The judge needs to write an an apology letter to the municipality, state, country, then serve the term he threatened the victim with
"Judicial immunity" = Judges are held to a lower standard than the average citizen, because "ignorance of the law isn't an excuse" for us.