Building a DIY CT/CAT scanner for 200$

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024

Комментарии • 268

  • @chemistryofquestionablequa6252
    @chemistryofquestionablequa6252 Год назад +379

    I often wonder what the limits of of what we could make if you got all the RUclips science nerds together with a moderate budget. I bet that not much would be off the table. Great video!

    • @PyrotechnicalScience
      @PyrotechnicalScience  Год назад +75

      We’d at least have the capabilities of a small university.

    • @chemistryofquestionablequa6252
      @chemistryofquestionablequa6252 Год назад +60

      ​@@PyrotechnicalScience we'd be a massive security threat, lol. You just know that Cody would want to build a nuke.

    • @PyrotechnicalScience
      @PyrotechnicalScience  Год назад +45

      @@chemistryofquestionablequa6252 lol I was just thinking that! Our biggest challenge would be government intervention 🤣

    • @simonwatson5299
      @simonwatson5299 Год назад +15

      @@chemistryofquestionablequa6252 Nah, build a fusion reactor!! (The fact that nobody has built one sucessfully, ever, might be a challenge though). Or improve on the old Soviet Radioisotope thermoelectric generators, that were portable (kinda).

    • @chemistryofquestionablequa6252
      @chemistryofquestionablequa6252 Год назад +14

      @@simonwatson5299 those things are kinda terrifying, mostly because there are some just rotting away in Siberia.

  • @Steelplayer59
    @Steelplayer59 Год назад +59

    Absolutely incredible that this works as well as it does. After working 4 decades in control systems, I would recommend programming at least one more additional button on your remote - an E-Stop (emergency stop) button to instantly halt the x-ray and high voltage power supply, should someone (or possibly a pet) enter into the area unexpectedly. Impressive that you researched this so completely. Well done!

  • @nasiriyah110
    @nasiriyah110 Год назад +21

    I fix CT scanners for a living. This is pretty darn cool!! When you started out, I was trying to figure out how you were going to make all of that rotate around your “patient.” You simply rotated your “patient” itself. Well done! You need to get into this business!!

  • @bilinguliar
    @bilinguliar Год назад +153

    Your beeper code does not give enough time for LOW. It does HIGH for a second, goes to LOW and immediately back to HIGH. What you need is another pause after the LOW.

    • @jhyland87
      @jhyland87 Год назад +3

      Well done.

    • @Shinobubu
      @Shinobubu Год назад

      need to hold HIGH and LOW through prolonged increments.

    • @the555timer
      @the555timer Год назад +5

      for(int i = 0; i < 45; i++)
      {
      digitalWrite(2, HIGH);
      delay(1000);
      digitalWrite(2, LOW);
      delay(1000); // this is what you were missing
      }

    • @ame7165
      @ame7165 6 месяцев назад +1

      even better is to just use PWM. the atmega's default clocks put all of the PWM frequencies in the human audible range, so you can just set PWM to 50% duty cycle, wait one second, then turn it back off. no need for a loop. example from memory: (it's been a minute since i touched an arduino so double check the syntax lol)
      // i believe this is one of the PWM pins, and i think it's in the low kHz range
      int beeperPin = 6;
      pinMode(beeperPin, OUTPUT);
      // beeper on. this is 127 of 255, so 50% duty cycle square wave. (and it's 255 because it's 8-bit, and that includes 0, so it's 256 total)
      analogWrite(beeperPin, 127);
      // let it beep for one second
      delay(1000);
      // beeper off
      analogWrite(beeperPin, 0);

  • @charleschidsey2831
    @charleschidsey2831 Год назад +166

    Bravo my friend! I was in medical school in the 1970’s when the first CT scanner was developed by the engineering branch of EMI Limited in London, England. They were better known at the time as one of the four largest music publishing companies in the world. I believe at one time they owned the rights to the entire Beatles catalogue. I spent 41 years doing general surgery and, without a doubt, the CT scanner was the most useful of all the technologies in my medical toolbox. Originally it was only able to perform brain imaging and the scans were quite pixelated but, of course, the technology rapidly improved and eventually it was applied to all parts of the body. In the space of about a decade, “exploratory laparotomy” (opening a patient’s abdomen to find out what was causing pain, infection, obstruction, bleeding, etc.) became nearly obsolete. Currently a surgeon generally knows a lot about what he/she will find before the patient ever reaches the operating room allowing for careful preplanning of the procedure. I recall many exploratory surgeries early in my career where there were at least a half dozen possibilities going in. Surgeons had to essentially be ready for almost any eventuality. This forced a very rapid assessment, diagnosis and treatment plan while the surgery was in progress. This was exciting to say the least but also very stressful. It is rare nowadays to be in that sort of situation, though it still sometimes occurs when a patient’s condition is too unstable even to perform a brief CT scan. Excellent work young man. When I read the title of your video, I thought perhaps you misunderstood the complex nature of the reconstruction algorithm. Turns out I was the one trying to keep up with your explanations and logic. Sir Godfrey Hounsfield shared the Nobel Prize for his work in developing computed axial tomography, perhaps one day you might help invent some new technology to make the world a better place. I’m rooting for you.

    • @gregorymalchuk272
      @gregorymalchuk272 Год назад +3

      What kind of computers were they using to collate the x-ray scans and render a graphical result?

    • @Smytjf11
      @Smytjf11 Год назад +4

      Should I not be feeling like I'm watching a kid play with a live grenade?

    • @jamescostello6529
      @jamescostello6529 Год назад +8

      @@gregorymalchuk272 I believe it was DEC computer and the output was to a dot matrix printer. I had one done of my head at John Hopkins in 1974.

    • @izybit
      @izybit Год назад +8

      @@Smytjf11 These radiation levels aren't really that dangerous unless you sit in front of it for extended periods of time. If anyone knows how to use these components they also know not to stay next to them while operating.

    • @charleschidsey6192
      @charleschidsey6192 Год назад +8

      @@gregorymalchuk272 they are mostly proprietary and sold with the scanner by companies like GE, Siemens, Toshiba, etc. most are about the size of a home refrigerator though I don’t know if most of that is taken up by memory modules. That’s why I was skeptical that the RUclipsr could perform the spatial reconstructions using a laptop, but he proved me wrong. What’s more, this was just his initial attempt. He could refine this significantly using an old microwave oven with rotating platform as was suggested by another commenter.

  • @sfertman
    @sfertman Год назад +13

    While not medical grade, it still demonstrates the working principle and actually extremely useful for imaging internal structures of all sorts of things!!

  • @johanlindeberg7304
    @johanlindeberg7304 Год назад +7

    Impressive! If you are doing this much do not forget radiation safety!

  • @petermarin
    @petermarin Год назад +6

    I’d be careful about that direction of the x-rays since you’re not using proper shielding. It’d be terrible to give cancer to your neighbours..

  • @thatslogan1
    @thatslogan1 Год назад +2

    I’m not going to lie, most of this video confused the hell out of me, but this is actually amazing. I’d love to see what else you come up with, could be saving lives man🙏🏻

  • @judebox1185
    @judebox1185 Год назад +1

    Sweet, been waiting for this video. Great job and results.

  • @killsalot78
    @killsalot78 Год назад +3

    man all you gotta do is build a nice rig that keeps the scanner actually true with what its looking at and this thing is already good enough for a lot of scanning projects, still impressive what a cardboard box can do

  • @jerome1lm
    @jerome1lm 3 месяца назад +1

    I love the evil mad scientist energy!

  • @stephengfazio
    @stephengfazio Год назад +3

    I’m an electrical engineering student and this is the type of tomfoolery shenanigans I signed up for. Oddly enough, I too am guilty of searching for old ultrasound and X-ray machines, and yeah they’re all out of my student budget. Thanks so much for sharing
    I might consider doing a version of this project for my signals and systems class and maybe get into signal processing more. I’m really interested in ultrasonic levitation and phased arrays for the purpose of capturing mosquitos and other small insects 🐜 muahaha

  • @johnnyunfiltered1832
    @johnnyunfiltered1832 Год назад +1

    Arduino needs to sponsor this man

  • @mbunds
    @mbunds Год назад +2

    THANK YOU!!!! Now I understand the difference between CAT/CT and MRI; before your production I thought these were similar systems. Was I ever wrong, thanks again!

  • @nhand42
    @nhand42 Год назад

    When I was in school my science fair project was a bi-carb volcano. Kids these days are so much more advanced.

  • @SussyFortskinNiteFreakbob
    @SussyFortskinNiteFreakbob Год назад +4

    It kinda blows my mind it's still cheaper to build a CT scanner than get a CT scan here in the US 😂

    • @stickyfox
      @stickyfox Год назад +1

      We're the only country with a privatized for-profit healthcare system. :(

  • @al3k
    @al3k Год назад +1

    This is going to be absolutely golden info for after the apocalypse. Thanks man. Good stuff!

  • @jimsamson7934
    @jimsamson7934 Год назад

    After hearing about the Therac-25 story, I would never want to mess with X-ray equipment. Especially if you're relying on a wimpy arduino as your control board.

  • @mapleleaf4ever
    @mapleleaf4ever Год назад +4

    That was friggin' mint! Well done with a budget. I'd say you got better than $200 of image quality as that looks about as good as some airport scanners. lol

  • @beppe3001
    @beppe3001 Год назад +3

    Great video! From the point of view of en electronic engineer what you've done is very cool but also I don't see any disclaimer - explanation about X-ray safety. I'm pretty sure that you know risks of ionizing radiation expoasure and extremely high voltage but must consider that viewers might not know it! I'm sorry to bother about safety but I think it is very important, expecially for the most unexperienced viewers, and since you are giving the information (through the video) it is your responsability.
    Hope I've pass the message without being too much annoying, peace :)

  • @arnoldogonzalez2214
    @arnoldogonzalez2214 2 месяца назад +1

    Anyone else trying to look at their sealed trading cards? 😂

  • @TheBlackFoxMaster
    @TheBlackFoxMaster Год назад +1

    Помню в сериале девяностых Вэлари Айронс Протэкшен показывали такой. За 30 лет ничего не поменялось.

  • @chrishayes5755
    @chrishayes5755 Год назад +3

    your skillset is deadly 🔥🔥🔥
    cool project

  • @TechneMoira
    @TechneMoira Год назад +7

    Very ingenious setup :) This is what I imagine raw unfettered experimenting with simple means should be. Nicely done, but please remember that Xrays are not a trivial thing ! Always take the necessary precautions. I'm curious how far you'll take the concept :)

    • @davidconner-shover51
      @davidconner-shover51 Год назад +4

      hence, why he was across the yard.
      BTW, I helped build a general medical scanning facility once, the Xray and CT scanner rooms were lined in lead along the sides.
      the MRI room was lined in copper sheeting

  • @hullinstruments
    @hullinstruments Год назад +1

    Scrap yards. That's where I find my x-ray machines and I've even found a CT and other more niche machines. With the older ones just be careful about the pcbs in the high voltage oil
    Buddy of mine runs a local industrial salvage yard, but they also take just general scrap from the public. Not many people allowed to look around in there but he lets me come in whenever I want. I bought a half a dozen x-ray machines over the last 4 or 5 years. Some of them old nice film types, some of them super modern Siemens digital wrap-arounds. You can find a scrap yard and make friends, you'll definitely get some X-ray and medical stuff from time to time... But here's the key... You need to find out who the clients were that brought it and talk to them. In my case it was a guy who owns a business repairing, setting up, and brokering all types of machines like that. So he gave me a heads up when he was bringing the remains of a CT to the yard. That way I could get it before it hit the ground and receive damage. you'd be amazed what kind of stuff comes in these scrap yards. The smaller family-owned yards are usually the only ones that will let you come in and buy. But a few boxes of cookies and a polite attitude... And they'll keep your number on their desk and call you when certain things come in.
    A lot of corporations have bought out so many of the small scrap yards and they won't even let their own employees buy from them because of the liability. So you have to find a family-owned or smaller scrap yard. I pay around $0.05 per pound which means I got those x-ray machines for between 15 and $25 according to their weight.
    Some of the smaller scrapyards might not have a portal scanner or monitoring system. Basically that type of system is something you would find at airports, customs, and a tractor trailer weigh in stations. It's a super-sensitive scintillating Crystal detector probe and a radiation monitor with alarm. You can pick them up on eBay from time to time for pennies on the dollar. At the very least I would get a good Ludlum m and a good sensitive scintillation probe detector. Because scrapyards can get some really spicy things from time to time and they might not even know it. I've got a collection that includes some really spicy things. One of which my scintillation probe started singing and freaking out when I was more than a half a mile away from the yard. I guess it helps to be near Chattanooga Tennessee and just right next door to oak ridge national Lab. That's not necessarily were some of the radiation sources came from, but due to the huge history of radiological events and development around here... The stuff just seems more prevalent. The spiciest thing I ever foundis something similar to what I mentioned above. It is in a 5-gallon bucket with LED flashing wrapped around it about 6 in thick on all sides. That is submerged in a 50 gallon drum of water and kept in my storm cellar away from the house and underground. So yeah spicy to say the least and I was very lucky to find something like that and prevent my buddies or anybody else at the yard getting exposure. This is happened multiple times with similar situations. Sometimes not so spicy but sometimes super hot and scary. Calling the proper authorities and people with the experience to remove stuff like that... A lot of times they will come and check it out and unless it's something weapons-grade or something truly truly dangerous they won't even confiscate it. Although they will find the yard for not having portal in area monitors. They're more interested in getting the tag number of the dude who brought it and all the pictures taken by the yard so they can track them down and see what else they might have.

  • @Shinobubu
    @Shinobubu Год назад

    Here comes the Arduino kit.. THERE IT IS!!!

  • @WisdomEDM
    @WisdomEDM Год назад +1

    That'd be dope to compare sieverts to a modern x-ray machine

  • @tttuberc
    @tttuberc Год назад +2

    You are so smart at such a young age. Great project and very good concept. I've wanted to do a home made xray for a long time. This seems to have all the ingredients I need and extra great stuff. Love the info about reconstruction of the 3d object

  • @aga5897
    @aga5897 Год назад

    Absolutely Awesome !
    Superb project, very well done !
    Don't take any crap about the arduino code - if it works, it's good.
    Sure it could be better, so could we all.

  • @jchulski19
    @jchulski19 Год назад

    this is the best most dangerous thing i'v ever seen

  • @AmaroqStarwind
    @AmaroqStarwind Год назад +3

    Random idea: an Ionizing Radiation Detector peripheral for the original GameBoy. The more cost effective you can make it, the better.
    You could collaborate with “The Thought Emporium” and/or “stacksmashing”.

  • @glennfelpel9785
    @glennfelpel9785 Год назад

    I believe you need a delay (1000) or so after the digitalwrite(2, LOW); statement. After the digitalwrite(2, LOW) you are immediately going back to writing it high again.
    Wonderful video

  • @DonnyHooterHoot
    @DonnyHooterHoot Год назад +1

    Next up? Here Kitty, Kitty! Just kidding, I know, NO living things must be home scanned. Great video!

  • @jameslucarelli7172
    @jameslucarelli7172 Год назад

    oh my gosh dude this is awesome. im only slightly jealous cause ive had a simillar idea for a while now but ive gotten distracted by other projects im working on

  • @needsmorecoffee
    @needsmorecoffee Год назад +1

    6:40 Still way better than the software written for the Therac-25 😂
    Nice project bro

  • @miken7629
    @miken7629 Месяц назад

    Being technically competent at such a young age is great, you have serious future potential. Since you can produce X-Rays might I suggest an application other than imagery. Try to develop a receiver antenna that would convert X-Rays back into electricity similar to a solar panel converting photons into electricity. Space travel has a problem with cosmic rays penetrating the space ship and damaging the astronauts, like being under constant X-Ray bombardment, current shielding is insufficient. Astronauts during Apollo missions kept seeing flashes of light even when their eyes were closed, those were cosmic rays hitting their bodies. If you can convert X-Rays into useful electricity before they penetrate the ship that would save astronauts lives & produce power for Plasma engines. It is worth the research. X-Rays are different frequency than gamma rays but the approach should be similar. Gamma rays also come from nuclear waste, an antenna encasing nuclear waste would become a battery that last for centuries and worth a Nobel Prize.

  • @BruceNJeffAreMyFlies
    @BruceNJeffAreMyFlies Год назад

    You've got your beep in a loop so its going to happen 45 times. It seems to be 'staying on' because there is no delay between the switching off and the switching on. It goes on, waits for a second, goes off, then it changes the value of 'i' and does a check, once that check is done it instantly goes back to the 'switch on' instruction. The time it takes to switch back on is imperceptibly short. It will perceptibly stay on for 45 seconds and then turn off and continue the rest of the code.

    • @gnomeprints
      @gnomeprints Год назад

      Yep this is the reason. I was going to post this exact thing but then I saw this. Set another delay after the LOW or it has zero delay and just stays on all the time.(or set the delay before the HIGH ... I personally don't do anything before the HIGH :) )

  • @markmalonson7531
    @markmalonson7531 Год назад +1

    This is great wow. Question what about radiation cell damage from exposure to x-rays is there shielding etc?

  • @arjbingly
    @arjbingly Год назад +4

    I think it’ll be really cool to repurpose an old microwave machine to do this. Since it’s already got a turning table and stuff.

    • @PyrotechnicalScience
      @PyrotechnicalScience  Год назад +3

      Hmmm you’re onto something there! I could lead shield it then replace the old electronics with my own, I’ll definitely probably try that in the future!

    • @arjbingly
      @arjbingly Год назад

      @@PyrotechnicalScience yep, super excited to see it.

    • @Charlie8food
      @Charlie8food Год назад +2

      @@PyrotechnicalScience the microwave motor would have to be a non standard one. The motors that I have found inside the microwaves take a random direction when they are turned on.

    • @PyrotechnicalScience
      @PyrotechnicalScience  Год назад +1

      @@Charlie8food I’d just replace it with a stepper motor

  • @johnkelly7264
    @johnkelly7264 Год назад +1

    This is all so interesting, and love the technical detail. Subbed here!

  • @TheSpookiestSkeleton
    @TheSpookiestSkeleton Год назад +2

    Okay I had no clue they went as low as 39k, that's scary

  • @DMANOG
    @DMANOG 6 месяцев назад

    Thanks to you I'm going around offering free cat scans to cats

  • @algorithminc.8850
    @algorithminc.8850 Год назад

    Really enjoyed your set of videos on X-rays. Thanks. Subscribed. Cheers.

  • @TT-lf5hi
    @TT-lf5hi Год назад +1

    Very cool. MATLAB is good and is very well documented so any problems you have can usually be resolved by doing a google search. Also, going into the deep end is always a learning experience, MATLAB might be worth it if you do simulations or data analysis.

  • @alexanderrolfe7620
    @alexanderrolfe7620 Год назад

    7:25 It's probably been mentioned but the issue with the buzzer staying on is that it turns off at the end of the loop cycle, but then immediately starts the cycle over turning itself back on. doing something like "buzzer on, wait 500ms, buzzer off, wait 500ms" would produce something similar to what you want.

  • @PedroHenrique-xm1yt
    @PedroHenrique-xm1yt Год назад +1

    Great job! One thing, it's probably much harder and slightly questionable regarding safety, but if you manage to run the tube at full power (not sure how many kV you are using) you can probably record video directly of the intensifying screen, then you just do a pretty quick 360spin and then extract the frames, are you using long exposure for the pictures? Excellent video, and sorry if it's something you already considered hahahaha

  • @ethanbarnes3973
    @ethanbarnes3973 Год назад +2

    See if chat got can upgrade your code for you?! Could be a neat quick video!

  • @jamesmurphy7442
    @jamesmurphy7442 Год назад

    Love the shielding being used, or not in this case.

  • @May-pu8rs
    @May-pu8rs Год назад

    Hello, you have a beautiful mind. Keep posting videos
    😍

  • @deadlikedisco4726
    @deadlikedisco4726 Год назад +6

    I enjoyed the shit out of this video. Please keep it up and continue refining your coding skills. I bet you could get this process to come out very smooth.

  • @MBaltz
    @MBaltz Год назад +1

    Very nice video!!

  • @riscy00
    @riscy00 Год назад

    Wow that was good video..... I now know. How. It work great work!!

  • @unwarranted3472
    @unwarranted3472 Год назад

    I appreciate someone picking up the baton from William Osman

  • @emmetray9703
    @emmetray9703 Год назад +1

    FBI and DEA loves you.. greetings from bureau

  • @Rustaceann
    @Rustaceann Год назад

    Somebody probably answered this, but in your buzzer loop you need another delay after writing LOW to create off-time. Because it's a loop, it's going straight from digitalWrite(LOW) to digitalWrite(HIGH) without a delay.
    Original script:
    for(i = 0; i < 45: i++) {
    digitalWrite(2, HIGH);
    delay(1000);
    digitalWrite(2, LOW);
    //delay(1000);

  • @JimmyZNJ
    @JimmyZNJ Год назад

    Very cool project!! But if my doctor pulls out a setup like this I am running! lol

  • @kevinfelker5544
    @kevinfelker5544 Год назад

    Your videos are so kool. U actually explained this so well. Keep making great content like these videos.

  • @unusualfabrication9937
    @unusualfabrication9937 Год назад +1

    styropyro has a successor it seems.
    seriously, this shit is crazy. Impressive, but crazy

    • @davidconner-shover51
      @davidconner-shover51 Год назад

      this guy seems less likely to get killed IMO, he seemed to be standing in the right place anyways.
      is it me, or does that Mammography Xray tube look like it was made on the cheap as well?

  • @spicemasterii6775
    @spicemasterii6775 Год назад

    Amazing. Pretty soon you'll be building a nuclear reactor

  • @NicholasAndre1
    @NicholasAndre1 Год назад +1

    Hmm curious how the crazy phone image AI that they use to improve the image interferes/helps. If it’s possible to find an app that turns off some of the magic would be good to compare. During scientific things it’s best to remove as much of the magic and apply it later, especially because it can vary from shot to shot.
    Also if you add a counter or something that was visible in the image it would help to map the particular degrees of a shot. Probably the best move is to integrate it with a Pi or something so you can correlate the shots with the actual data on rotation.

  • @rkan2
    @rkan2 Год назад

    Now I wanna see you make the thing that spins really fast 😂

  • @SpruceHouse
    @SpruceHouse Год назад

    you should build a mini MRI next

  • @Slydder68
    @Slydder68 Год назад

    this would be really cool to reverse engineer and properly generate a boardview of logicboards where only schematics are currently available. nice job guy.

    • @maxhouseman3129
      @maxhouseman3129 Год назад

      If it's more than one layer it's mostly impossible. Cooper is normally used as beam filter in Xray machines.

  • @fitybux4664
    @fitybux4664 Год назад +1

    6:52 Your problem with the code was not just asking ChatGPT to give you Arduino code, then describe your project and the pins being used. 😆
    Welcome to "programming" in 2023.

  • @jg1772
    @jg1772 Год назад

    Bro, how do you know all this stuff?! You don’t look very old. Awesome buddy!!

  • @rharnatkiewicz
    @rharnatkiewicz Год назад

    you need to add a delay for the beep because the statement is still true so it will instantly turn back on @7:34

  • @jterry211
    @jterry211 Год назад

    The nuclear boy scout comes to mind

  • @Xenu321
    @Xenu321 10 месяцев назад

    Actually this is a cone beam ct, not a fan beam ct as it would be in a modern ct. However, It's pretty interesting

  • @j.h.656
    @j.h.656 Год назад

    Very nice channel, hope you keep it up and grow a ton

  • @DaveEtchells
    @DaveEtchells 2 месяца назад

    Fantastic project!
    Is the number of slices tied to the number of original shots, or is it just down to how the data is processed? (I imagine there’s a relationship in terms of useful depth resolution, but probably not a direct one, given multiple other variables.)

  • @SciHeartJourney
    @SciHeartJourney Год назад

    I love this, but be very careful when using X-ray tubes!

  • @mrdan2898
    @mrdan2898 Год назад +1

    Make sure NOT to expose your skin, body parts to your scanner. It's cool, but the wrong Xray strength can seriously harm the body.

  • @realcygnus
    @realcygnus Год назад

    Nifty ! You seem to have quite a lot of technical knowledge/skills, especially for such a young'n. I think its a safe bet that we can expect more great things from you. Instant sub ! 👍 Yup, I did say young'n BTW. 🤪

  • @dirtbuilder4615
    @dirtbuilder4615 Год назад

    the constant beep thing you have in your code happens because you turn the beeper on, wait 1 second turn it of and repeat this 45 times in a loop, it shoud beep for about 45 seconds

  • @zebo-the-fat
    @zebo-the-fat Год назад

    That is very impressive!

  • @amitaimedan
    @amitaimedan Год назад

    Impressive...

  • @Cici1kus
    @Cici1kus 3 месяца назад

    Great video. 🎉🎉
    But I have a question. Why do you scan the object 360 degrees? Isn't 180 degree of rotation enough? 0° and 180° images should be just mirror images. What am I missing?

  • @karlswanson95
    @karlswanson95 Год назад

    Enjoyed your video. Have you considered doing video on x-ray fluorescense spectroscopy?

  • @alexkart9239
    @alexkart9239 Год назад +1

    What do you think about building a scanner with an array of electronic sensors like those used by Peter Jansen? it can allow you to detect a weak signal directly, with higher sensitivity and much faster. The original "openCT 2" (can be found on 'hackaday') has a pretty low resolution, but signal-to-noize ratio is pretty impressive.

  • @bryanne274
    @bryanne274 Год назад

    Someone make a video capturing how many times he said ct scan 😂😅

  • @trollenz
    @trollenz Год назад

    That deserves a sub

  • @OnnieKoski
    @OnnieKoski Год назад

    Very cool! I’d love to see how to turn this into a 3d model in Blender or something.

  • @marcusm8009
    @marcusm8009 Год назад

    Sounds like Netflix and Disney are about the same. Netflix is for filings, Disney gets too hot and takes too long.

  • @ET_AYY_LMAO
    @ET_AYY_LMAO Год назад

    7:30 your beeper code just beeps continuously for 45 seconds...

  • @DanBader
    @DanBader Год назад +1

    So..... Ebay? Or what? Where did you get a working x-ray tube and HV power supply for under $200?

  • @anthony4530
    @anthony4530 Год назад

    I think it would be more fun to be spun around at ludicrous speed inside a stationary CT scanner instead of lying still on the bed while several hundred pounds of equipment is trying not to fly apart while spinning at several hundred rotations per minute.
    (*”fun” = DANGEROUS!)

  • @tobyoverton_hvacr
    @tobyoverton_hvacr Год назад

    But where’s your aluminum foil covered door? No one likes roasted nuts…

  • @illegalcoding
    @illegalcoding Год назад

    Great video!

  • @chuxxsss
    @chuxxsss Год назад +1

    Well done, you are very brilliant. You did well finding the parts.

  • @Machiflores
    @Machiflores Год назад

    I don't know if the algorithm wrought me here because I saw a bunch of videos about incidents with radiation (work in nuclear), or because I look a lot of engineering videos. The CT machine looks nice, but bear in mind you are toying with radiation fields. Did you research on radiation protection? Ie: What if you relay gets stuck? Would you notice?

  • @m.l.5284
    @m.l.5284 Год назад

    Very nice project. Would it also be possible to build an MRI scanner? I don't like to expose my body too much to X-Ray. MRI is the way to go I.m.o.

  • @Xray-Rep
    @Xray-Rep Год назад

    Awesome project! Can you provide some details about the X-ray source, such as the high voltage magnitude and the current (mA) that the tube draws? I have experience repairing dental X-ray machines, and so I have a good understanding of the circuitry and how it functions. Do you have a link to your construction details that you can share with others who might want to duplicate this project? THANKS!

  • @eversoncoutinhooficial
    @eversoncoutinhooficial Год назад +1

    What type of x-ray tube did tou use?

  • @Dallemations
    @Dallemations Год назад +2

    Dude this guy needs a scholarship to mit!

  • @jhyland87
    @jhyland87 Год назад

    I just realized I'm not a patreon of yours :-O So I signed up.
    (Edit:* Now that I think about it, I may have been a member before, but I realized I was spending too much on Patreon, so I went through and deleted most of the memberships that used a monthly model as opposed to per video model. But I re-signed up.
    If you create new levels that are _per video,_ I'm sure more people would sign up for those (I only prefer it because sometimes channels stop uploading for like a year or more, and Patreon keeps going if I don't unsubscribe).

    • @PyrotechnicalScience
      @PyrotechnicalScience  Год назад

      Thanks for becoming a member I appreciate that a lot! I also got some patreon rewards coming out so I’ll be sending you a real lead white paint sample (if you want it of course)
      Also didn’t know patreon offers a per video subscription, I’ll have to set that up!

    • @jhyland87
      @jhyland87 Год назад

      @@PyrotechnicalScience yeah, I wish there was a way for someone to do both (eg: contribute $5/mo and then $10 per video), I think that would be neat

  • @qewqeqeqwew3977
    @qewqeqeqwew3977 Год назад

    I don't know what country you are from, but in almost every country in the world you are not allowed to operate such devices without a special permit, certified radiation protection equipment, being a certified operator, in presence of a certified radiation protection officer, with your device being tested, certified and registered by an appropriate governmental institution and many more requirements. So make sure you are not committing any felony there.

  • @straightalk7206
    @straightalk7206 Год назад

    He only lost a couple of IQ points when he cracked his head long boarding....then goes on to make his own CT scanner for $200 using and Arduino and some spare parts. Mind = blown.

  • @MorningStarChrist
    @MorningStarChrist Год назад

    I wanna make a death ray

  • @HugoHugunin
    @HugoHugunin Год назад

    CT scan a watermelon, or pomegranate and see all of the seeds, skin/rind and membranes.