It would not be Ms. Walders duty to "call" the NY Times. 24:20 It's certainly not cowardly to fulfill one's duty. Her duty was fullfilled and does not include "calling" the NY Times for any reason. Any concern should be brought to one's chain of command or congressional representatives. I wouldn't place a Want Ad in the NY Times. Anyone who would use the word coward has no appreciation for or must be completely ignorant of the safety Tracy Walder and those like her have provided to the world.
I think she is very brave to go right out of her comfort zone to take on these jobs. Good on her for pushing her limits. What does Tracy think about Snowden?
Snowden, in my humble opinion,........DID.....get out of his comfort zone. He had to...."move"....out of the comfort zone of the USA. A judge in the USA "ruled", for what I understand, that proceeds from Snowden's book "Permanent Record" would not go to Snowden. I currently have that book in my personal library. Post Tenebras Lux
@@uwekonnigsstaddt524 Yes, but you are obviously a self-identified complete idiot. National security documents must be held secure or you have no national security. This should be obvious to any being with a at least a pretense to intellectual competence on such issues. An intelligent 8-year-old can see it. "Chelsea" Manning is a related case in point. Private communications between governments must be kept private if the wheels of diplomacy can function and thereby produce peace. Without privacy in such communications, that process is retarded and much less can be accomplished. The result in an even more hostile and tense world. Such simple facts that even a first-year new lawyer can understand has apparently escaped your vast intellect and sagacious wisdom.
She has to really be with it to make it in both the CIA and FBI, but she comes across so timid and almost too sweet. I think she's tougher than she looks.
It's a measured approach. Human intelligence officers have a practiced approach for most social situations, called a pretext. If you've seen her on MSNBC lately, then you've seen her speaking with the icy, hard cold steel of a seasoned agent. She can do both!
@@bwackbeedows3629 correct; that’s why I used the analogy of the Blue-Ringed octopus……beautiful…..yet intelligent, efficient. A professional. And cute to boot. Wait, I’ve already said that.
ThIs goofy bioch talking shyt about Puff Daddy justifying the excessive use of force during the unlawful raids of his properties. This dumb azz chick claims the excessive force was warranted "because he has had trouble with the law before" biatch Diddy has never been convicted of any crimes involving weapons ever so what the fook you talking about? another dummbazz Karen running her mouth for $🤷🏾.
You should re-upload these RUclips videos after applying iZotope RX 8 to the audio. Super 007 spy people should be able to handle the software and it would really improve your interview quality.
You forgot to ask one of the most important questions which is- How come no WMD was found in Iraq? After all that was the most significant argument advanced for the invasion of Iraq? Flowing from her response to this question the next question ought to have been asked, What led/ misled you into believing that there was WMD there??
She was really lucky to grow up in a family which valued "experiences", over material things. Life doesn't mean anything, it's an experience. The experience of being alive, while guided by one's "pysche". Just read Joseph Campbell's works on comparative mythology.
I really like her overall "energy". The hardest position to take politically is non partisan (independent of part affiliation). Then we can speak our truth, while aiming for what's best for the majority. Once the late Zen Master, Thich Nhat Hahn replied, when asked which side he was on during the Vietnam war (while visiting the United States to get support for the suffering people of Vietnam): "I'm from the center.".
I like her and I think she's very smart and probably did a good job -- especially since she had no experience at all -- but is anyone else wondering why our government -- who can hire the smartest and most experienced people in the world to find terrorists (who are the number one threat to our country -- after China) would hire a 21-year-old kid right out of college, to work with the top people in our country???? Hiring her to work at the CIA is fine, I am glad they did. But how many kids have been advising our presidents? I DO think we should have young people in the mix -- and get their opinions, especially on certain things. But this all seems very odd to me. And then they take the chart -- and completely sabotage all the good work her team did???? These are the things you would do if you didn't really want to catch the terrorists.
kdlofty Absolutely. The *BEST* are always needed in jobs, regardless of their genders, race, etc. Results matter. Meritocracy matters. Think of the opposites who compromise the national security of their countries. Imagine recruiting those with too much thin-skinning, personality disorders, criminal tendencies, terrorist mindset, etc.
Out of curiosity, why would it be mentioned where she lives and with whom? Doesn't seem pertinent in any way but is a security failure even if in a very small sense, or is it to deter potential suitors?
The politicization Of different agencies over time Made it harder To do your job and do it in the right way I feel sorry for peopleIn this goes where any agencies dealing with a federal government is too bad For the nation or any nation.Once a valuable service For anyone to be in no not so much.
@@markrtaylor Were you home schooled, or self taught? You seem to be disrespectful of the teaching profession. Did you have a bad experience, or is it that Rush Limbaugh is your hero and you just love to quote him?
(34:00 FBI 1st days) I've found when gaining new employment, coworkers purely resent any seemingly spectacular work history. I'm beyond being competitive, and want to genuinely appreciate all my coworkers, but they become petty and vicious when learning of certain things. The FBI has become far from non partisan. It's dominated by leftists who despise anything labeled 'anti terror.' They also refuse to pursue Marxists in relation to terrorism. Not all Marxists are terrorists, but almost all terrorists are Marxists. These are old facts. News agencies also refuse to cover the relationship between Marxism and terrorism.
I didn't hear her say that in this interview -- did she say that somewhere else? If so, that's very strange, I agree -- because this interview, along with another video I saw on this channel recently, convinced me that the FBI is more corrupt than I thought --that it is not only the top people (as Trump says), and that the whole FBI culture is rotten, and has been, ever since that little pervert Hoover started the agency.
@Southeastern777 You mean, aside from the Strozk and Page emails? Others at the FBI as well? (It would not surprise me.) When Page emailed him and said, "Do you think Trump could get elected?" (or something along those lines), Strokz said , "We won't let that happen." I watched the video here, from the Spy Museum, "The Burglary that Exposed the FBI's Secret Surveillance Program" -- it shows how widespread and evil the FBI's nation-wide spying and infiltrating program was. They intentionally got people ill, lied about people, framed people, and really stopped at nothing. I knew all about their part in killing Martin Luther King and others, and I knew Hoover was a psychopath -- but this video shows us that the entire agency went along with his illegal and really evil practices. They need to be shut down. ruclips.net/video/BpNaflAh3Gc/видео.html
@Southeastern777 JFK said the CIA should be blown up into a million pieces, and then they killed him. They are and have always been completely out of control. It's true that "the fish rots at the head." Many of the bad agents would not be as bad, or would be weeded out, if the top people were good -- if the culture was good -- but they aren't and it isn't . . . but OF COURSE, there are MANY good, honest patriots in the agencies. I still think most cops are good people and I agree with you that the dirty cops and corrupt chiefs give them a bad name. I cannot say the same for lawyers or doctors. Most soldiers are good too, but it's tricky -- because psychopaths are drawn to certain professions, and the the military is one of them - they love killing people. (Lawyers, politicians, and news anchors have a higher percentage of psychopaths in their ranks also.) I don't think we need a CIA. We should have analysts in the State Department -- they do not need to be secret. The CIA needs to be blown up into a million pieces. We need a federal bureau of investigation -- but this one that we have is probably too rotten to reform. The other thing is that the FBI and the CIA are riddled with spies and traitors, and always have been. They keep it quiet -- only publicizing the big ones who cost our country billions and had so many people killed . . . It turns out that MOST of them are working with the enemy BEFORE they join the agencies. This means that the recruiting process is seriously flawed and must be completely changed. Experts IN the CIA say that they only catch 5% of them, and 95% get away with it. But they have caught dozens! I've only been looking into this for a few days and I already have DOZENS of names of identified traitors that worked in these agencies or in our government. FDR's government, for instance, was full of Russian agents -- even in the White House. (And some of them were already working with the Chinese as well, and other countries.) General Patton knew about FDR's traitors. (Many of them were eventually revealed.) The head of the CIA (Wild Bill Donovan) assassinated General Patton. They also killed JFK. Our government and these agencies are chock full of spies and double agents right now -- probably mostly Chinese. It took them 10 years to catch Aldrich Ames and he wasn't even smart. (He was buying $500,000 houses with cash.) Robert Hanssen got away with it for 22 years and they only caught him because a Russian ratted him out. They ignored sign after sign after sign -- people even tried to turn him in and they were ignored. I believe there are traitors at the very top of these agencies. The FBI is thought to be the best investigative agency in the world. No one rinning it could be so unbelievably negligent and incompetent. I believe that someone was protecting him and he didn't even know it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Hanssen -- Some reporter just exposed how many people in our government have direct ties (such as spouses) to the Chinese Communist party right now. They just busted a bunch of Chinese spies working with Harvard professors. The CIA and FBI and other intelligence agencies are a liability.
9/11 was planned in 1978. The greater isreal project written by ex foreign minister oded yione. Like Wolfowitz wrote in document " plan for the New American century to invade the middle east 7 countries the same countries named in 1978 from the nile to the alfraties. We need another pearl harbour! And we know now FDR let japan waltz right in there. Plus again to start a war in Egypt isreali fighter jets attacked the uss liberty and were to blame Egypt but there were survivors! Vietnam in the river tompkin they said again North Vietnamese attacked a ship which was another lie . False flags started just about all wars .
Consider the following: ONLY those species who get off of this Earth and out of this solar system continue to survive longer into the future, (if it can even actually be done for various reasons), everybody else dies and goes extinct. It is basically a survival game in outer space. Enjoy the game. (Reusable code from my files): Consider the following: * There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1: a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity. b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity. c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity. * 3 reduced down to 2: a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity. b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die. * 2 reduced down to 1: a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity. b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity. (And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.) And then ask yourself the following questions: 1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents. 2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input. 3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center. 4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence. 5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity. 6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to? Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things. Our true destiny currently appears to be: 1. We are ALL going to die one day from something. 2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced. 3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place. Currently: Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA) * (Note: This includes the rich, powerful, and those who believe in the right to life and the sanctity of human life. God does not actually exist and Nature is not biased other than as Nature. Nature does what Nature does in a cause and effect kind of way. Truth is still truth and reality is still reality, regardless of whatever we believe that reality to be. And denying future reality will not make future reality any less real in a cause and effect state of existence.) ** Hence also though, legalizing suicide so as to let people leave this life on their own terms if they wish to do so. Many people and species are going to die in the 6th mass extinction event that has already started, at least some, horrible deaths. Many will wish they could die, and all will, eventually. And the 6th mass extinction event will not be the last mass extinction event for this Earth. But if suicide were legal, at least some people would not have the added guilt of breaking societies' law before doing so. Just trying to plan ahead here. Giving people an 'out' if they wish to take it.
Find some entity to do my gravity test and possibly have the literal Theory Of Everything: (More reusable code from my files): Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a. My Current TOE: THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons. 10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. 11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks. 12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. 14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe. 15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true. 26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught? DISCLAIMER: 27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty. Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way. a. Imagine a 12 hour clock. b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions. c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions. (The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.) d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields. e. Do this with the em fields on and off. (The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.) f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects. (Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.) (And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.) (An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.) 'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done. 'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
If numbers themselves do not exist in this universe by the following or some similar way for math to do what math does in this universe, then how exactly do numbers exist in this universe for math to do what math does in this universe? (Reusable code from my files): 'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows: Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction; Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction; Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction. Then: 1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe. (And possibly '0', zero, as possibly neutrals are against other neutrals, even if only briefly, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have).
120 Chemical elements to finish off the Periodic Table of the Elements: (Reusable code from my files): I currently believe that there are 120 chemical elements in this universe. If a person were to look at how electrons fill up the shells in atoms: 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 (seven shells), and realizing that energy could freely flow in this universe if nothing stopped it from doing so, then a natural bell shaped curve might occur. An eighth energy shell might exist with a maximum of two elements in it, chemical element #119 (8s1) and chemical element #120 (8s2). Chemical Element #119 (8s1): #119 I put at the bottom of the Hydrogen group on the Periodic Table of the Elements. It only has one electron in it's outer shell with room for only one more electron. Energy might even enter the atom through the missing electron spot and then at least some of the energy might get trapped inside of the atom under the atom's outer shell. Chemical Element #120 (8s2): #120 I put at the bottom of the Helium group since it's outer shell is full of electrons. It might have some of the properties of group two, Beryllium group (Alkali Earth Metals group) since it has two electrons in it's outer shell; as well as some of the properties of the Helium group (Noble Gases group) since it's outer shell is full of electrons; and if you look at the step down deflection of the semi-metals and where #120 would be located on the chart, it's possible #120 might even have some semi-metal characteristics. #120 would be the heaviest element in this universe. I believe chemical element #120 could possibly be found inside the center of stars. When a neutron split inside of this atom, it would give off one proton, one electron, neutrinos and energy. The proton and electron would be ejected outside of the atom since all their respective areas are full. One proton and one electron are basic hydrogen, of which the Sun is primarily made up of, and the Sun certainly gives off neutrinos and energy. And note, it's the neutron that split, not a proton. So even after the split, there are still 120 protons inside of the atom and the atom still exists as element #120. The star would last longer that way. In addition, if the neutron that split triggered a chain reaction inside of the star, this could possibly be how stars nova, (even if only periodically). If stars were looked at as if this theoretical idea were true, and found to even be somewhat true, then we might just have a better model of the universe to work with, even if it's not totally 100% true. And if it's all 100% true, then all the better.
Math so far for the TOE idea: (Reusable code from my files): The mathematics for the TOE doesn't even exist yet as far as I am currently aware. It goes beyond any quantum field theory formulas that I am currently aware of. The outline though is basically as follows: The formula has at least 3 levels to it: 1. The Internal Photon Level: The 3 interacting forces, (which might even be just a singular force with 3 different modalities), all interacting at basically 90 degrees to each other and all simultaneously pulsating and swirling. A complex part of the formula but I believe to be totally doable. 2. The External Photon Level: For each pulsating, swirling photon, all the pulsating, swirling photons interacting with it. An exponential part of the formula that I am not even sure modern day super computers could adequately handle. 3. The Inter-dimensional Photon Level: For each modality within each photon would have an energy frequency associated with it. The energy frequencies could be seen as being in their own space time dimension. (For me, 'space' is energy itself of which is the 'gem' photon and 'time' is the flow of energy; 'temperature' is the interaction of energy), so one would be dealing with way more than just 3 spatial dimensions and way more than just 1 time dimension (as there would many different energy frequencies with many different flows of energy). Whenever like resonate energy frequencies resonated with each other, they would affect each other, kind of like 'spooky action at a distance'. Anytime energy frequencies overlapped, there would be a temporary spike of some sort in each space time dimension. In addition, if in reality the 'gem' photon is just a singular force with 3 different modalities, it's possible that energy could 'slip' between modalities which would also affect the results. A very complex part of the formula on top of all the complexity that came before it. 4. Any time any energy moved in the system, the entire formula would have to be recalculated due to potential ripple effects. Like I said above, I don't even believe the mathematics exists yet for what I am trying to do, but at a minimum, the formula would contain the above levels the way I currently see it to be.
"Space Time": (Reusable code from my files): FOR ME: 'Space' is energy itself. Wherever space is, energy is. Wherever energy is, space is. They are one and the same thing. And for me, the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe. 'Time' is the flow of energy. 'Time' (flow of energy) cannot exist unless 'space' (energy itself) exists. And 'space' (energy itself) that does not flow (no flow of time / energy) is basically useless. An entity cannot even think a thought without a flow of energy. If all the energy in the universe stopped flowing, wouldn't we say that 'time stood still'? Time itself would still exist, it would just not be flowing, (basically 'time' stopped). But then also, how space and time are linked in what is called 'space time', (energy and it's flow).
She is very beautiful. I don't know if it's an optical illusion but her body looks mis proportioned or something. Is probably an optical illusion. But I would like to see her sitting next to a pool..
I am impressed by her humility and accomplishments. Thank you for your service.
I just read her book, "The Unexpected Spy" Fabulous book and she's a rock star!!! (February 2024)
Ordered the book after listening.
Hearing your story over the heads of those who tried to hold you back is extremely satisfying.
This lady is amazing. Thank you for your service. They should have appreciated you.
I enjoyed this interview. Going to read her book.
❤❤❤❤ Tracy Walder. Excellent interview!
It would not be Ms. Walders duty to "call" the NY Times. 24:20 It's certainly not cowardly to fulfill one's duty. Her duty was fullfilled and does not include "calling" the NY Times for any reason. Any concern should be brought to one's chain of command or congressional representatives. I wouldn't place a Want Ad in the NY Times. Anyone who would use the word coward has no appreciation for or must be completely ignorant of the safety Tracy Walder and those like her have provided to the world.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 perfectly said
I think she is very brave to go right out of her comfort zone to take on these jobs. Good on her for pushing her limits.
What does Tracy think about Snowden?
Snowden, in my humble opinion,........DID.....get out of his comfort zone. He had to...."move"....out of the comfort zone of the USA. A judge in the USA "ruled", for what I understand, that proceeds from Snowden's book "Permanent Record" would not go to Snowden. I currently have that book in my personal library. Post Tenebras Lux
@@uwekonnigsstaddt524 Yes, but you are obviously a self-identified complete idiot. National security documents must be held secure or you have no national security. This should be obvious to any being with a at least a pretense to intellectual competence on such issues. An intelligent 8-year-old can see it. "Chelsea" Manning is a related case in point. Private communications between governments must be kept private if the wheels of diplomacy can function and thereby produce peace. Without privacy in such communications, that process is retarded and much less can be accomplished. The result in an even more hostile and tense world. Such simple facts that even a first-year new lawyer can understand has apparently escaped your vast intellect and sagacious wisdom.
She has to really be with it to make it in both the CIA and FBI, but she comes across so timid and almost too sweet. I think she's tougher than she looks.
She's a tough lady. She Reminds me of the Blue-ringed octopus.....one of the most beautiful creatures at sea. Post Tenebras Lux
It's a measured approach. Human intelligence officers have a practiced approach for most social situations, called a pretext.
If you've seen her on MSNBC lately, then you've seen her speaking with the icy, hard cold steel of a seasoned agent. She can do both!
@@bwackbeedows3629 correct; that’s why I used the analogy of the Blue-Ringed octopus……beautiful…..yet intelligent, efficient. A professional. And cute to boot. Wait, I’ve already said that.
@@uwekonnigsstaddt524 Post Tenebras Lux! 🙏🏿
ThIs goofy bioch talking shyt about Puff Daddy justifying the excessive use of force during the unlawful raids of his properties. This dumb azz chick claims the excessive force was warranted "because he has had trouble with the law before" biatch Diddy has never been convicted of any crimes involving weapons ever so what the fook you talking about? another dummbazz Karen running her mouth for $🤷🏾.
I really like this YT channel. Thank you for putting these up.
Very interesting. Thanks.
Great teacher.
You should re-upload these RUclips videos after applying iZotope RX 8 to the audio. Super 007 spy people should be able to handle the software and it would really improve your interview quality.
You forgot to ask one of the most important questions which is-
How come no WMD was found in Iraq? After all that was the most significant argument advanced for the invasion of Iraq?
Flowing from her response to this question the next question ought to have been asked,
What led/ misled you into believing that there was WMD there??
Because the was no WMD… the story was all made up
She was really lucky to grow up in a family which valued "experiences", over material things. Life doesn't mean anything, it's an experience. The experience of being alive, while guided by one's "pysche". Just read Joseph Campbell's works on comparative mythology.
I really like her overall "energy". The hardest position to take politically is non partisan (independent of part affiliation). Then we can speak our truth, while aiming for what's best for the majority. Once the late Zen Master, Thich Nhat Hahn replied, when asked which side he was on during the Vietnam war (while visiting the United States to get support for the suffering people of Vietnam): "I'm from the center.".
Good it's online here, not so many prople in the auditorium .
Omg I needed this
I like her and I think she's very smart and probably did a good job -- especially since she had no experience at all -- but is anyone else wondering why our government -- who can hire the smartest and most experienced people in the world to find terrorists (who are the number one threat to our country -- after China) would hire a 21-year-old kid right out of college, to work with the top people in our country???? Hiring her to work at the CIA is fine, I am glad they did. But how many kids have been advising our presidents? I DO think we should have young people in the mix -- and get their opinions, especially on certain things. But this all seems very odd to me. And then they take the chart -- and completely sabotage all the good work her team did???? These are the things you would do if you didn't really want to catch the terrorists.
We needling people especially women, doing the work of keeping the homeland safe.
Why do we "need" "women" specifically? Surely you "need" the best person? Or are you just sexist?
kdlofty Absolutely. The *BEST* are always needed in jobs, regardless of their genders, race, etc. Results matter. Meritocracy matters. Think of the opposites who compromise the national security of their countries. Imagine recruiting those with too much thin-skinning, personality disorders, criminal tendencies, terrorist mindset, etc.
Interesting conversation.
So much was not discussed .
The Intel Community is not like TV.
Out of curiosity, why would it be mentioned where she lives and with whom? Doesn't seem pertinent in any way but is a security failure even if in a very small sense, or is it to deter potential suitors?
Thank You Tracy " Zero Dark Thirty " ! ! You Rock. :)
Is she the character its based on.
I thought the same thing…..wonder if she found Bin Laden….however she is sworn to secrecy for the rest of her life….
Actually….she’s too young as Bin Laden was years ago…
She failed Spy School but got Straight A's with the CIA. Lots of blood on her hands.
Night time .. is the right time
The politicization Of different agencies over time Made it harder To do your job and do it in the right way I feel sorry for peopleIn this goes where any agencies dealing with a federal government is too bad For the nation or any nation.Once a valuable service For anyone to be in no not so much.
Women that wish they were her and men that will never get to touch her, ruined her career.... and that really sucks, I guess jealousy is everywhere
Those that can DO, Those that CAN'T teach!
What a naive thing to say.
@@carterjackson8033 Truth hurts, doesn't it Professor......
@@markrtaylor Were you home schooled, or self taught? You seem to be disrespectful of the teaching profession. Did you have a bad experience, or is it that Rush Limbaugh is your hero and you just love to quote him?
@@carterjackson8033 Projection is considered a Mental Illness!
@@markrtaylor okay, I see, Rush Limbaugh was your teacher. That's a pretty old right wing line. Have a nice day.
"We don't work on Sundays" sounds like something a German would say, having lived there.
They are efficient and can get easily get things done in 6 days or less.
It was France I bet
She can teach me a lot
(34:00 FBI 1st days)
I've found when gaining new employment, coworkers purely resent any seemingly spectacular work history. I'm beyond being competitive, and want to genuinely appreciate all my coworkers, but they become petty and vicious when learning of certain things.
The FBI has become far from non partisan. It's dominated by leftists who despise anything labeled 'anti terror.' They also refuse to pursue Marxists in relation to terrorism. Not all Marxists are terrorists, but almost all terrorists are Marxists. These are old facts. News agencies also refuse to cover the relationship between Marxism and terrorism.
Strange that she has stated that Trump's negative criticism of the F.B.I. culture is unwarranted?
I didn't hear her say that in this interview -- did she say that somewhere else? If so, that's very strange, I agree -- because this interview, along with another video I saw on this channel recently, convinced me that the FBI is more corrupt than I thought --that it is not only the top people (as Trump says), and that the whole FBI culture is rotten, and has been, ever since that little pervert Hoover started the agency.
@Southeastern777 You mean, aside from the Strozk and Page emails? Others at the FBI as well? (It would not surprise me.) When Page emailed him and said, "Do you think Trump could get elected?" (or something along those lines), Strokz said , "We won't let that happen."
I watched the video here, from the Spy Museum, "The Burglary that Exposed the FBI's Secret Surveillance Program" -- it shows how widespread and evil the FBI's nation-wide spying and infiltrating program was. They intentionally got people ill, lied about people, framed people, and really stopped at nothing.
I knew all about their part in killing Martin Luther King and others, and I knew Hoover was a psychopath -- but this video shows us that the entire agency went along with his illegal and really evil practices. They need to be shut down. ruclips.net/video/BpNaflAh3Gc/видео.html
@Southeastern777 JFK said the CIA should be blown up into a million pieces, and then they killed him. They are and have always been completely out of control. It's true that "the fish rots at the head." Many of the bad agents would not be as bad, or would be weeded out, if the top people were good -- if the culture was good -- but they aren't and it isn't . . . but OF COURSE, there are MANY good, honest patriots in the agencies.
I still think most cops are good people and I agree with you that the dirty cops and corrupt chiefs give them a bad name. I cannot say the same for lawyers or doctors. Most soldiers are good too, but it's tricky -- because psychopaths are drawn to certain professions, and the the military is one of them - they love killing people. (Lawyers, politicians, and news anchors have a higher percentage of psychopaths in their ranks also.)
I don't think we need a CIA. We should have analysts in the State Department -- they do not need to be secret. The CIA needs to be blown up into a million pieces. We need a federal bureau of investigation -- but this one that we have is probably too rotten to reform.
The other thing is that the FBI and the CIA are riddled with spies and traitors, and always have been. They keep it quiet -- only publicizing the big ones who cost our country billions and had so many people killed . . . It turns out that MOST of them are working with the enemy BEFORE they join the agencies. This means that the recruiting process is seriously flawed and must be completely changed. Experts IN the CIA say that they only catch 5% of them, and 95% get away with it. But they have caught dozens! I've only been looking into this for a few days and I already have DOZENS of names of identified traitors that worked in these agencies or in our government. FDR's government, for instance, was full of Russian agents -- even in the White House. (And some of them were already working with the Chinese as well, and other countries.) General Patton knew about FDR's traitors. (Many of them were eventually revealed.) The head of the CIA (Wild Bill Donovan) assassinated General Patton. They also killed JFK. Our government and these agencies are chock full of spies and double agents right now -- probably mostly Chinese.
It took them 10 years to catch Aldrich Ames and he wasn't even smart. (He was buying $500,000 houses with cash.) Robert Hanssen got away with it for 22 years and they only caught him because a Russian ratted him out. They ignored sign after sign after sign -- people even tried to turn him in and they were ignored. I believe there are traitors at the very top of these agencies. The FBI is thought to be the best investigative agency in the world. No one rinning it could be so unbelievably negligent and incompetent. I believe that someone was protecting him and he didn't even know it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Hanssen -- Some reporter just exposed how many people in our government have direct ties (such as spouses) to the Chinese Communist party right now. They just busted a bunch of Chinese spies working with Harvard professors. The CIA and FBI and other intelligence agencies are a liability.
So did she predict that the DOD would commit a world wide program of Genocide ?
there are always two sides to every story. We heard only her perspective, regarding being mistreated even by other women in the agencies.
i had a dream and i loved it, not a nightmare for ...............
What are her views on Snowden?
" A famous serial killer..." Why do I have a weird feeling we're NOT talking about Ted Bundy? 😀
Tracy was my honey trap...
9/11 was planned in 1978. The greater isreal project written by ex foreign minister oded yione. Like Wolfowitz wrote in document " plan for the New American century to invade the middle east 7 countries the same countries named in 1978 from the nile to the alfraties. We need another pearl harbour! And we know now FDR let japan waltz right in there. Plus again to start a war in Egypt isreali fighter jets attacked the uss liberty and were to blame Egypt but there were survivors! Vietnam in the river tompkin they said again North Vietnamese attacked a ship which was another lie . False flags started just about all wars .
Tracy!!! Hi!!!
She a tiger.. my tiger
Wait she got put in the counter terror program on 9/10/11, the day before the surprise attack? Ummmmmmmmm.
Apparently nothing has changed …
This moderator is the worst.
Listen.. I’m making some changes.. take care of your self..
Very nervous energy...
You didn’t say anything… I’m here… all is ok! Say hello for once! I gotta do everything
You can be my teacher 👩🏫
No reason why
🙏🌻🌼🌼🌻🌻🥦🥦🥬👌
Things could of went different
Algorithm.
The greatest threat to the whole world is religion.
Margaritas and a hotel spi beach
What pap.
You know I’m 22.. 😘😜😉
Would have preferred hearing her talk more and less of him
Glad I brought $2500,000,000 million dollars in one day
Interviewer takes over… had to stop watching.
CIA concentration test. Focus on what she is saying not what you would like to do with her:)
I think that's the general idea. 😀
Consider the following: ONLY those species who get off of this Earth and out of this solar system continue to survive longer into the future, (if it can even actually be done for various reasons), everybody else dies and goes extinct. It is basically a survival game in outer space. Enjoy the game.
(Reusable code from my files):
Consider the following:
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
And then ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Our true destiny currently appears to be:
1. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
* (Note: This includes the rich, powerful, and those who believe in the right to life and the sanctity of human life. God does not actually exist and Nature is not biased other than as Nature. Nature does what Nature does in a cause and effect kind of way. Truth is still truth and reality is still reality, regardless of whatever we believe that reality to be. And denying future reality will not make future reality any less real in a cause and effect state of existence.)
** Hence also though, legalizing suicide so as to let people leave this life on their own terms if they wish to do so. Many people and species are going to die in the 6th mass extinction event that has already started, at least some, horrible deaths. Many will wish they could die, and all will, eventually. And the 6th mass extinction event will not be the last mass extinction event for this Earth. But if suicide were legal, at least some people would not have the added guilt of breaking societies' law before doing so. Just trying to plan ahead here. Giving people an 'out' if they wish to take it.
Find some entity to do my gravity test and possibly have the literal Theory Of Everything:
(More reusable code from my files):
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
If numbers themselves do not exist in this universe by the following or some similar way for math to do what math does in this universe, then how exactly do numbers exist in this universe for math to do what math does in this universe?
(Reusable code from my files):
'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows:
Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction.
Then:
1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe.
(And possibly '0', zero, as possibly neutrals are against other neutrals, even if only briefly, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have).
120 Chemical elements to finish off the Periodic Table of the Elements:
(Reusable code from my files):
I currently believe that there are 120 chemical elements in this universe. If a person were to look at how electrons fill up the shells in atoms: 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 (seven shells), and realizing that energy could freely flow in this universe if nothing stopped it from doing so, then a natural bell shaped curve might occur. An eighth energy shell might exist with a maximum of two elements in it, chemical element #119 (8s1) and chemical element #120 (8s2).
Chemical Element #119 (8s1):
#119 I put at the bottom of the Hydrogen group on the Periodic Table of the Elements. It only has one electron in it's outer shell with room for only one more electron. Energy might even enter the atom through the missing electron spot and then at least some of the energy might get trapped inside of the atom under the atom's outer shell.
Chemical Element #120 (8s2):
#120 I put at the bottom of the Helium group since it's outer shell is full of electrons. It might have some of the properties of group two, Beryllium group (Alkali Earth Metals group) since it has two electrons in it's outer shell; as well as some of the properties of the Helium group (Noble Gases group) since it's outer shell is full of electrons; and if you look at the step down deflection of the semi-metals and where #120 would be located on the chart, it's possible #120 might even have some semi-metal characteristics. #120 would be the heaviest element in this universe. I believe chemical element #120 could possibly be found inside the center of stars.
When a neutron split inside of this atom, it would give off one proton, one electron, neutrinos and energy. The proton and electron would be ejected outside of the atom since all their respective areas are full. One proton and one electron are basic hydrogen, of which the Sun is primarily made up of, and the Sun certainly gives off neutrinos and energy. And note, it's the neutron that split, not a proton. So even after the split, there are still 120 protons inside of the atom and the atom still exists as element #120. The star would last longer that way.
In addition, if the neutron that split triggered a chain reaction inside of the star, this could possibly be how stars nova, (even if only periodically).
If stars were looked at as if this theoretical idea were true, and found to even be somewhat true, then we might just have a better model of the universe to work with, even if it's not totally 100% true. And if it's all 100% true, then all the better.
Math so far for the TOE idea:
(Reusable code from my files):
The mathematics for the TOE doesn't even exist yet as far as I am currently aware. It goes beyond any quantum field theory formulas that I am currently aware of. The outline though is basically as follows:
The formula has at least 3 levels to it:
1. The Internal Photon Level: The 3 interacting forces, (which might even be just a singular force with 3 different modalities), all interacting at basically 90 degrees to each other and all simultaneously pulsating and swirling. A complex part of the formula but I believe to be totally doable.
2. The External Photon Level: For each pulsating, swirling photon, all the pulsating, swirling photons interacting with it. An exponential part of the formula that I am not even sure modern day super computers could adequately handle.
3. The Inter-dimensional Photon Level: For each modality within each photon would have an energy frequency associated with it. The energy frequencies could be seen as being in their own space time dimension. (For me, 'space' is energy itself of which is the 'gem' photon and 'time' is the flow of energy; 'temperature' is the interaction of energy), so one would be dealing with way more than just 3 spatial dimensions and way more than just 1 time dimension (as there would many different energy frequencies with many different flows of energy). Whenever like resonate energy frequencies resonated with each other, they would affect each other, kind of like 'spooky action at a distance'. Anytime energy frequencies overlapped, there would be a temporary spike of some sort in each space time dimension. In addition, if in reality the 'gem' photon is just a singular force with 3 different modalities, it's possible that energy could 'slip' between modalities which would also affect the results. A very complex part of the formula on top of all the complexity that came before it.
4. Any time any energy moved in the system, the entire formula would have to be recalculated due to potential ripple effects.
Like I said above, I don't even believe the mathematics exists yet for what I am trying to do, but at a minimum, the formula would contain the above levels the way I currently see it to be.
"Space Time":
(Reusable code from my files):
FOR ME:
'Space' is energy itself. Wherever space is, energy is. Wherever energy is, space is. They are one and the same thing. And for me, the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe.
'Time' is the flow of energy.
'Time' (flow of energy) cannot exist unless 'space' (energy itself) exists. And 'space' (energy itself) that does not flow (no flow of time / energy) is basically useless. An entity cannot even think a thought without a flow of energy. If all the energy in the universe stopped flowing, wouldn't we say that 'time stood still'? Time itself would still exist, it would just not be flowing, (basically 'time' stopped).
But then also, how space and time are linked in what is called 'space time', (energy and it's flow).
Tracy Tracy.. be my baby….. mi mamacita!
What ? Who wallowed in self pity after 9/11 . Dumb comment .
What role did she play , if any, on the decision to invade Iraq .
She is very beautiful. I don't know if it's an optical illusion but her body looks mis proportioned or something. Is probably an optical illusion. But I would like to see her sitting next to a pool..
So glad the Spy Museum is closed. I hope they lose a bundle.
Why is that? Just curious..
@@eleasahridley
1/ Verbally abusive managers.
2/ Rude employees.
3/ Expensive admission.
4/ Interactive displays constantly breaking down.
@@stevencharles9534 My family had a great time there.
@@daywilliams1000
Different people have different experiences. We all have different levels of expectation.
yes Karen! please accept our apologies!
very great intellince super smart lecture.🏕🏕🏕🏕🏕🏕🏕🏕🏕🏕🏝🌎🏔