one of the most beautiful arrangements of a magnificent piece. I wouldn't say that the piano is any better than a full orchestra...but they just sound so vastly and magnificently different. Gorgeous work!
You know it’s funny, the cadenza for harp is still written the same but nobody actually plays it that way anymore. I was told playing as it is would come across as old fashioned.
@@marinadela1361 Tchaikovsky's version of the cadenza is awkward and undermelodic. David Bruce has a video essay on Tchaikovsky's harp orchestration being not great
Amazing recommendation, thank you! The cadenza/beginning section especially has some incredible harmonies. It's definitely one of my favorites, if not my favorite transcription.
This is actually Tchaikovsky's own arrangement for solo piano, published by P. Jurgenson. For whatever reason this arrangement lacks some of the well-known melodic flourishes seen in the orchestral score, so it really is an arrangement rather than an orchestra reduction.
@@luisdeleon9728 Tchaikovsky's and Taneyev's arrangements are nearly identical until the repetition of the main theme. Tchaikovsky's is significantly easier as it omits a lot of the countermelodies and call-and-response from the ballet. Taneyev's arrangement is far closer to the orchestral score; I think it's a better arrangement in most areas.
Спасибо! Потрясающее исполнение Вальса цветов Чайковского!!!! Мне очень понравилось!!! 👏👏👏
one of the most beautiful arrangements of a magnificent piece. I wouldn't say that the piano is any better than a full orchestra...but they just sound so vastly and magnificently different. Gorgeous work!
Splendido pezzo 💥❤️
he s got the best codas. also when the performer went in thru the climax with piano instead of forte, it did something for me. it was sooo delicate.
Love this arrangement and !performance!
You know it’s funny, the cadenza for harp is still written the same but nobody actually plays it that way anymore. I was told playing as it is would come across as old fashioned.
How come?
@@marinadela1361 Tchaikovsky's version of the cadenza is awkward and undermelodic. David Bruce has a video essay on Tchaikovsky's harp orchestration being not great
Vzletná a krásná skladba.😊
넘 좋다ㅜㅜ
When Tchaikovsky sounds like Chopin…❤❤❤
Percy Grainger's transcription is beautiful and virtuosic. Check it out
Amazing recommendation, thank you! The cadenza/beginning section especially has some incredible harmonies. It's definitely one of my favorites, if not my favorite transcription.
целый оркестр на одном рояле
Aight den, Nobu! Unlocked the blue eyes white dragon on dat muhhfukka!
😍😍😍
💜💜💜
who arranged this?
This is actually Tchaikovsky's own arrangement for solo piano, published by P. Jurgenson. For whatever reason this arrangement lacks some of the well-known melodic flourishes seen in the orchestral score, so it really is an arrangement rather than an orchestra reduction.
I think that’s the Schirmer Edition. There are other editions that have more of the original Music in it.
@@wgiauque that's interesting. thank you for the info
@@wgiauquewow didn't know Tchaikovsky made an arrangement, I was thinking in taneyevs arr
@@luisdeleon9728 Tchaikovsky's and Taneyev's arrangements are nearly identical until the repetition of the main theme. Tchaikovsky's is significantly easier as it omits a lot of the countermelodies and call-and-response from the ballet. Taneyev's arrangement is far closer to the orchestral score; I think it's a better arrangement in most areas.
Swan lake pleaseee
Poorly played
Yes
how?? at least give some examples cuz the guy playing is frickin blind
Agreed, but the pianist is visually impaired and can’t see the keyboard.
the pianist is blind....
Why?