Neuronal code, How neurons talk to create behaviors: Michael Hausser at TEDxBarcelona

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 21

  • @MJAGSALOG
    @MJAGSALOG 12 лет назад +6

    Great talk...can't help but think of the philosophical implications that may follow if we do "break" the neural code.

  • @Ruby_V_
    @Ruby_V_ 12 лет назад +3

    Its so very easy to comically pass off neuroscience as a bunch of guys getting paid to play with rats, but when you take a moment to see the incredible depth to these seemingly trivial activities, it is truly astounding.

  • @tusitw
    @tusitw 7 лет назад +7

    I wish the person filming has full screen on the slide so we can follow what he is pointing and lecturing, instead...!

  • @dosomething3
    @dosomething3 5 лет назад +7

    4:19 “the 3 f’s - Fighting Feeding and Mating”.

    • @area51xi
      @area51xi 3 года назад +1

      This is a really old joke.

  • @cypresse1620
    @cypresse1620 4 года назад

    I love his voice

  • @eenkjet
    @eenkjet 5 лет назад +2

    Keep in mind "cracking the code" doesn't mean understanding causation. Recent advances have killed Hodgkin Huxley. The voltage is just a pumping of the lipid which crystallizes to create an electromechanical signal... but not so fast... the signal is likely electromagnetic as flux... not so fast... braided magnetic flux which is a fractal frequency. So just providing voltage and getting a result doesn't mean you've reached the "code".

    • @kevinfairweather3661
      @kevinfairweather3661 5 лет назад +2

      What do you think the code is.. Do you think that in time we will be able to work out what the brain is doing ?

    • @KenanSeyidov
      @KenanSeyidov 5 лет назад +1

      Can you please explain how magnetic flux is of relevance to neural code

  • @shimondoodkin
    @shimondoodkin 5 лет назад +1

    the title is misleading he is describing how to track and manipulate neurons in the lab using genetic an optical technics.
    there was no a single word about How neurons talk to create behaviors

    • @dosomething3
      @dosomething3 5 лет назад

      Shimon Doodkin just by looking at the date of the video upload I could’ve told you that this video cannot have any new information. Very sad. They are not sending their best.

  • @area51xi
    @area51xi 3 года назад +1

    When a speaker is showing slides, you should show the slides not the speaker. AKA fundamentals of showing a presentation. TED talks have really slipped in quality. I'm not talking about the this particular speaker. I thought the talk was great. I'm referring to how it was produced and distributed.

  • @hacun3jr
    @hacun3jr 12 лет назад

    Only to you of course.

  • @holdenmcgroin8917
    @holdenmcgroin8917 5 лет назад +1

    This is deeply disturbing

  • @hedonepicurea4327
    @hedonepicurea4327 Год назад

    2:38 This is the wrong direction. Storing information in particles like photons is the right direction.
    This video is a great try but, definitely incorrect. This still requires foreign factors.
    This doesn't solve body malfunctions
    The wiring of a brain is unimportant. No matter how you're wired, if you can control and recircuit neuronal energy then, having symptoms like allergic rhinitis wilo disappear.
    Depending on wiring and physical solutions is a waste of money and inherently the wrong direction. Example, Japan and China have verifiable historical events where "chi" or "ki" was used yo obtain highly unlikely outcomes. If these societies depended on your physical methods then, the neurons would still short out or malfunction due to the physical reality of facing 10000 armed men with only a few soldiers or curing patients of unknown untreatable illnesses.
    Programming the energy itself or discharging it without relying on external factors is the answer and unfortunately for westerners the easterners have a very long head start in advancing past you. It all depends if they put 2+2 together.

  • @CrawlingAxle
    @CrawlingAxle 12 лет назад +1

    you lose credibility because you make no sense.
    almost everyone in the academia uses macs. mostly because they can use grant money to buy them.

  • @AngelusMortis1000
    @AngelusMortis1000 8 лет назад

    optogenetics is entirely silly, just as silly as parallel universes and mindupload