Every penny, dime, pence, and euro will be money well spent. Russia is being taken out of the picture as an aggressive nation and won't be a superpower after this. It will just be a big country with nukes. That's priceless.
The cost of simply allowing Russia to take Ukraine will only lead to more of the same. It is unfortunate, but there is no option apart from defeating Putin.
@@wonkygustav4457 .....and others Step forward China next if Putin is seen to win. China (and others are complicit in this war because of their tacit support
Let's also not forget that Putin's intentions for his military clearly extended far beyond Ukraine. Right before he invaded Ukraine in February, Putin was demanding that NATO pull back out of ALL Eastern Europe. Leaving The Baltic States, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Czechia and Slovakia possibly later targets for Putin invasion. Putin had vast ambitions, but his military has been an almost total fail in Ukraine. Now with NATO budgets greatly increased, two incoming new members with Finland and Sweden and the announcement of a 300,000 strong NATO rapid reaction force, the possibility of Putin extending his Russian empire deep into Europe is almost certainly over.
And I can asure you, Sweden and Finland are lightyears ahead of ukrainian military defense. Sweden have the best submarines in the world, a very strong airforce and Finlands army are the strongest in Europe. They have been prepared for war with russia since the end of ww2, so these 2 nations in Nato will be a gigantic lift.
@@johnadam2885 NATO does not have a 300,000 rapid reaction force. It currently has 40,000 troop in high readiness for the DEFENSE OF NATO MEMBER NATIONS. Ukraine is NOT A NATO MEMBER. Cowardice has nothing to do with NATO non-intervention in Ukraine.
Not sure they’ve “Ripped the guts out”, but have certainly given it a reality check in terms of it’s capability, the costs associated with invading a neighbour and also the danger of underestimating the resolve of those determined to stop you succeeding. Russia will be paying for this for years, if not decades.
I think "Rip the guts out" was more of the world's perception of the Russian Military and it's capabilities. The world was shocked how incompetent Russia was against a vastly weaker military such as Ukraine. On paper it should have had this in the bag, but it certainly didn't expect that resolve. Russia claims to be the 2nd most powerful military in the world, yet after the initial surge it has taken very little ground in the last three months of conflict.
That's what none of these people understand that the Ukrainians have the advantage of their country they're not going anywhere and if anybody has any delusions that the Russians are going to just be able to call a ceasefire and live peacefully on their occupied territory and the Ukrainians are just going to stop attacking them and fighting guerrilla warfare and the Russians being a target every day are out of their minds, because they certainly will be targets every second of every day the Ukrainians are never going to stop with Putin's continuing to attack civilians the Ukrainians just hate him more and more and more they will NEVER negotiate with Putin.
@@The31stcenturyfox A weaker Ukraine ? For 8 years US/NATO have used billions in order to create an Ukrainien army comparable to that of NATO. Weapons, training, US intelligence + fortification of Eastern Ukraine is not a "weak" Ukraine.
@@ellengran6814 Until February 24, 2022, NATO had provided very little support to Ukraine. They began the war with weapons inherited from the USSR, not western weapons.
@@ellengran6814 you don't get much for your billions in terms of military spending. They were on paper a lot weaker in terms of hardware. It has shown that wars are not just about hardware though. Russia's military are much weaker now that's for sure.
Coming from an Australian, I'm so glad to see the west so united like I haven't seen in my lifetime. Bullying is no longer acceptable in today's world.
@@Withnail1969 All it takes for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing. You can claim indifference, which is actually ignorance, but you can't step a foot outside your door without having an effect on others around you.
If the west doesnt suport Ukraine.Your basicaly giving Russia confidence to continue with their aggression.So they must continue to suport them no matter the cost and no matter the amount of time needed
Part of the issue with the Russian military and why it fails in modern mobile warfare is the culture that hides facts from lower ranks and does not give them independence in making decisions. Hence so many dead generals. Arguably the only way to change that is for Russia to adopt a more open culture but of course once Russia does that Russians get to see the stupidity of the war and how immoral it is. In short if Russia wants a better educated military it isn't going to be able to mount these kind of imperialistic attacks on its neighbours.
It is gaining ground in the Donbas. I don't see it being defeated easily if oil and gas prices remain at record levels.Russia is awash with hard cash and has big numbers
Fails? Are you watching a different movie? Does anyone really believe that Russia intended to capture he whole of Ukraine with a force of 100-200K men? Is this guy for real? He probably was told that we've all been lobotomized.
The west doesn't have long range artillery in huge numbers.The numbers are available. The west relies on US air, not artillery by the tens of thousands.
Totally don’t agree with the interviewee. Russia will go further after some time, not right away, but definitely will, if it is not stopped now. And it will be a much greater problem for the whole world.
Russia fights with just 15% of its army against a huge American puppet and takes 20% of heavily protected territory in 4 months. The US faught 20 years in Afghanistan but eventually got kicked by Taliban supported by in fact almost nobody.
Yes! You are right! They have to be definitely stopped now. Russia does not forgive defeats and does not abandon its imperialist plans. Because they are the only thing it has! We have to destroy Russia, before it destroys us. That's the truth. Maybe sad for someone. But better to be sad now than after the West's defeat.
@david healy Nato expansion is just an excuse for Putin. Dictators need excuses to justify their sick ideas and hate. Putin hates Ukraine because its people don't want to be his slaves. He can not stand USSR is gone and Ukraine is not his backyard anymore. Joining Nato it's a choice of every independent state and it's not Russia to decide about it. Why should we care abou Putin's paranoia and excuses? Ukraine gave up its nukes and Russia was supposed to respect Ukraine's independence and borders according to Budapest deal. Nato never attacked Russia, Ukraine never attacked Russia, its Russia who keeps invading neighbors.
The UK could soften the financial blow of supporting Ukraine by reversing all the tax cuts it's given to the rich who've transferred the money they've saved into off shore accounts.
Keep in mind that NATO weapons stockpiles may start to run low in the near future, but that's nothing compared to the state of Russian weapons stock. Putin has mostly run out of precision guided missiles not to mention +300 killed Russian officers ranks from captain to general.
Also let's not forget that the majority of the weapons that the West has been supplying to Ukraine are from old stocks of Soviet weaponry. Once those have been used up, higher tech Western weapons will be coming on line. That hopefully will be the turning point in this war of attrition.
NATO said it wouldn't expand. The west said it wouldn't get involved in Russia's sphere of influence. Lots of things are said, but when psychopaths are left unchecked, everything goes out the window.
@@backsync613 Yes, so we can say Russia reneged on its protection and recognition of Ukraine. And we can say at all times from 2004 and agression by Russia until the present time that Ukraine had no protection from NATO. So were countries like Poland et al wise to join NATO or not? We see countries not under NATO protection systematically being bullied by Putin, while NATO members enjoy the protection from NATO. Most critics of NATO criticise it for its brutality and not for its inaction. For example when it overran Iraq the losses for Iraq were difficult to estimate but we know they were apocalyptic.
@@jfryer485 Didn't really need a NATO for Iraq 1991. Most of the world that had a military was involved in that one with even a small platoon just to show real support. Everyone would have been in, NATO or no. You don't need defense agreements to help your friends or do what you believe is right. I'm guessing if Russia were to roll into Poland, article 5 would immediately take effect, so I'm thinking it's a good thing for them.
Exactly. It doesn't matter who pulls the trigger, so long as the investment is being used for its primary purpose - defending against dumb Russian aggression
Much better given to Ukraine to use up on the targets the taxpayers paid for them to be built for, than have them get old and obsolete and scrapped. If current ordnance and kit is being drawn down, get the manufacturers to build more. This is a much a world reset as the 2001 attacks were. Time to forget the renewables stupidity and get back to cheap energy and major strategic manufacturing in the west.
Yes, we are reducing our stocks of weapons by sending them to Ukraine, but remember that this is our war as well, and this is what the weapons are for. So we need to just get on with it.
@@defaultuser9423 Well since russian troops & weapons get destroyed by western/nato supplied stuff, it's certainly "our war" too in some ways, and russia sees it too.
Only US and Turkey have anything. Europe keeps around 200 tanks and 175 fast jets each. They are literally parasites off of US defense these days in terms of numbers of pieces. Iff you think we should give all of our tanks and jets we have in numbers to Ukraine, you are crazy. Remember how many pieces of equipment it took just to rather quickly beat up Iraq in 1991.
Ukraine has certainly embarrassed Russia's' military, but haven't ripped its guts out just yet. Hopefully their offensive in the South will change things soon.
No one is emberrassed. What was embarassing is US losing in vietnam and afghanistan after 20 years of fighting. Russia, while it could have performed better, is still meeting its main goals without full mobilazation and with usage of mainly old equipement. The world hasnt seen a conflict like this in decades. This is advanced warfare compared to wars US faught in recent years. People who expected russia to just take ukraine (second largest country in europe) in 2 days are not living in real world. And no, russias government never said russia is gonna take ukraine in 2 days. A common myth.
@@adembajramov3539 nope Ukraine with lend lease equipment from western countries, Russia loves to try to spin it as a conflict with NATO to justify being out fought by a smaller country where most of the equipment is of a lower specification than Russia’s. Considering that Russia had a Navy + strategic airforce + standoff weapons they’ve performed laughably.
After 19 years since the beginning of the invasion of Iraq, has the West forgotten this war? The Iraq war is said to have resulted in 1 million deaths the difference is russia have weapons of mass destruction A message to the future generations never make russia feel threatened the difference between "looking dangerous" and "being dangerous".Russia describes military doctrine as defensive military doctrine. With regard to nuclear weapons specifically, Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons: in response to the use of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it or its allies,in case of aggression against Russia with the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is threatened Russia has the World's Largest Bomber As of 2022, the Federation of American Scientists estimates that Russia possesses 5,977 nuclear weapons, while the United States has 5,428; Russia and the U.S. each have about 1,600 active deployed strategic nuclear warheads. Russia has the most nuclear weapons of any country, at 6,257. Of these, 1,458 are active, meaning they are already deployed, 3,039 are available (can be deployed if needed) and 1,760 are retired (out of use and awaiting dismantlement How do Russian nuclear weapons compare to the rest of the world? Russia - 6,257 America 5,550 UK - 225 France - 290 China - 350 Israel - 90 Pakistan - 165 India - 156 North Korea - 40 When you tell the truth it's always gonna be controversial. sar Bomba, (Russian: “King of Bombs”) , byname of RDS-220, also called Big Ivan, Soviet thermonuclear bomb that was detonated in a test over Novaya Zemlya island in the Arctic Ocean on October 30, 1961. The largest nuclear weapon ever set off, it produced the most powerful human-made explosion ever recorded. Russia's Tsar bomba: World's most powerful nuclear weapon of mass destruction. The Tsar bomba exploded about 4 km above the ground and reportedly produced a mushroom cloud 60 km high However, the Soviet Union developed three AN602 physics packages at 101.5 megatons (Mt) and these are more powerful than the Tsar Bomba, which was downscaled to 51 Mt before being used RDS-220 Vanya. it was modified to yield 50 megatons, which was estimated to be about 3,800 times the strength of the U.S. bomb dropped on Hiroshima during World War II The declassified study from the scientists at the Los Alamos laboratory, published in 1947 had first shed light on the question that how many nuclear bombs it would take to destroy the world. According to the study, it would take about ten to a hundred 'super nukes' to end humanity plus see this NATO attack: 14,500 have died in Libya 165,000 have died in Afghanistan 224,000 have died in Syria 1,200,000 killed in Iraq It did not shock anyone. None of these countries received approval. Russia's killing of 200 Ukrainian troops came as a shock. Human pain overflowed. Does NATO have any right to blame Russia at all The 10 Most Powerful Nuclear Bombs RDS-220 Hydrogen Bomb-"Tsar Bomba" (50 Megatons) B41 (25 Megatons) TX-21 "Shrimp" (14.8 Megatons) Mk-17 (10 to 15 Megatons) Mk-24 (10 to 15 Megatons) "Ivy Mike" H-Bomb (10.4 Megatons) Mk-36 (10 Megatons) B53 (9 Megatons) Mk-16 (7 Megatons) Mk-14 (6.9 Megatons USA bombing list : the democracy world tour -Korea and China 1950-1953 (Korean War) -Guatemala 1954 -Indonesia 1958 -Cuba 1959-1961 -Guatemala 1960 -Congo 1964 -Laos 1964-1973 -Vietnam 1961-1973 -Cambodia 1969-1970 -Guatemala 1967-1969 -Grenada 1983 -Lebanon 1983-1984 (both lebanese and syrian targets) -Libya 1986 -Elsavador 1980s -Nicaragua 1980s -Iran 1987 -Panama 1989 -Iraq 1991 (persian gulf war) -Kuwait 1991 -Somalia 1993 -Bosnia 1994-1995 -Sudan 1998 -Afghanistan 1998 -Yugoslavia 1999 -Yemen 2002 -Iraq 1991-2003 (US/UK on reguler basis) -Iraq 2003-2015 -Afghanistan 2001-2015 -Pakistan 2007-2015 -Somalia 2007-8 and 2011 -Yemen 2009 and 2011 -Libya 2011 and 2015 -Syiria 2014-2015 Never forget who's the real threat to the world !!
Putler has been engaged in asymmetric warfare against democracies since before he came to power - we didn't start this but us democracies need to finish it once and for all in Ukraine. Get on with it and supply the weapons and get it done - we have great fighters in Ukraine - they just need the tools.
Based on the Russian advances in eastern Ukraine due to lack of sufficent Ukrainian equipment and ammunition, the current result is expected. It could change if the West promptly provides the needed equipment and ammunition. Ukraine has the necessary and intelligent manpower. Let’s not repeat the mistakes of previous years.
@@MikeBrown-go1pc Is that what Pravda told YOU? You either forgot or are IGNORANT that when the Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons to Russia, Russia, the USA and Britain GUARANTEED to PROTECT the Ukraine! Russia of course didn't do that since Putin is STILL a KGB murderer with NO HONOR!
@@MikeBrown-go1pc really? Taking down terror camps was a mistake? I agree that involvement in syria might have been a mistake as interference and manipulation by unknown parties had the west thinking that the syrian govt was out of control for a while.
@@MikeBrown-go1pc which justified an undercover operation from russian army(which they denied 100 times, only after they annexed crimea they said it was all true)? We have a civilized society today, the false flag wars from russia are with nothing to justify.
Im not being bombarded, still have my house and cars, have a job, my son son is not going to war,.........i m not complaining about the gas prices for a good reason...these peoples need help NOW!!!!!
@@MikeBrown-go1pc Putin will try more land grabs in the future, and potentially attack other countries. Better to smash the Russian army now when it's on the back foot, and render it ineffective for future illegal wars.
@@bekeneel If US and NATO launched a high end air campaign on the scale of 1991 Iraq with today's planes on Russian forces in Ukraine, Russians would think aliens were attacking. Even years later, they still would not be able to tell what happened besides they were forced to abandon their campaign. Their only hope would be S-300,S-400 and BUK which my money is on US knowing where most are and they would be hit with swarms of cruise missiles, air jamming, drones and stealth aircraft. Their systems would be completely overwhelmed.
"Americans, indeed ALL FREE MEN, remember that in the final choice a soldier's pack is not so heavy a burden as a prisoner's chains." ... Ukraine soldiers are fighting and dying so they can be FREE MEN (AND WOMEN)!!! There is a nobility in their struggle ... not in war itself, instead the burning, white heat desire to be FREE.
Correct! They know what it is like to live under Soviet Rule and then with Pro-Russian politicians in power in Ukraine and they clearly have no desire to return to those days again! That is why they are fighting and dying to save Ukraine from the Russian Invasion.
Yes, winter will be cold. Yes, energy costs will be high. Every single person in the West wears a little bit. Together it's a lot. What kind of human life is this? How much does a human life cost? I like to put on a jacket in winter. Greetings from Germany
What is that price? What is winning for Russia. I know there are far greater enemies righy here at home than putin. Can't see my life changing at all if whatever Russia winning is happens.
@@MikeBrown-go1pc actually it will. The war ending will almost certainly reduce the price of fuel oil, vegetable oil and wheat, as well as wood (lots of LVL wooden beams come from Russia)
Gas and electricity and food may be cheaper but that's only if you let it be and lift sanctions. But that's never going to happen We have to pay heigh cost no matter what happens . More guns more tanks more soldiers all paid for with price hike and tax .
"Guns and tanks and planes are nothing unless there is a solid spirit, a solid heart, and great productiveness behind it." ... Eisenhower, again ...Maybe it is important to realise the Ukrainians are fighting for their very survival!!! And this places the burden on the Free World to help Ukraine in any way we can, they possess a "solid spirit and a solid heart."
@@bulwinkle "Despise nothing except meanness, selfishness and CORRUPTION"... "Fear nothing except disloyalty, indifference and cowardice" ... I'am a believer in the Ukrainian leadership.
@@bulwinkle "Despise nothing except meanness, selfishness and CORRUPTION" ... Fear nothing except disloyalty, indifference, and cowardice." I'am a believer in the Ukrainian leadership. Unlike Russia, I think the Ukrainians understand the 8% rule... 8% of defence spending is allocated to hardware, the rest is allocated to training their people, maintenance and a ready supply of ammunition.
This person seems very opinionated, though his ideas lack philosophical and historical grounding,. Also, cultures live and are united by values, people are willing to die for them. European leaders are united on this one for a reason. They completely miscalculated Putin.
This war has also shown how an abundance of relatively cheap, highly advanced weapons like Javelin and the manpads have mitigated a disadvantage in airforce and armour. And that artillery is still King...
Artillery is still King..yes, but advanced HIMAR guided rocket artillery has superceded conventional artillery.. Ukraine just needs more now, and Russia's whole way of way will be finished.
Ok guy … Russian has taken Ukraines oil and gas fields… They also have control or destroyed most of their best farmland… A third or 15m people will never return to their homes…
Looks like they have given up - the replacements are shopkeepers and lawyers and Comedians coming from Kyiv to fight - what a shock going up against the Chechens
@@cliveengel5744 Russia has lost 1/4 of it's Army and gained no strategically important cities. Russia holds less territory now than they did at the start of the invasion and advanced weaponry is only now starting to pour into Ukraine.
" An ADD Society ", right there is the central issue. Another issue is that our adversaries do not change governing administrations every four years. Can America willfully, and strongly prosecute a war that would require unification of purpose without the interruption of grandstanding politics from one party or the other? I'm not saying change our system, to the contrary. I am saying different leaders can support different means, different things, and the yo-yo effect on a serious war effort where for instance our culture, and society may be at risk, will these leaders stick to an initial plan, and fortify it? This is what our adversaries believe we cannot do. This presents a lack of diligence and determination to follow through. Glory to God, Victory for Ukraine, Rise Free Nations!
On the point of governments changing, this is actually a good thing. Putin can't mobilise because he fears the reaction. He lacks the legitimacy and the confidence that his people are behind him. He is also isolated from reality, surrounded by cronies, because he has been in power too long, which allows this to develop. Consequently, his decision making is terrible, because the information he receives is terrible.
"Get there firstest with the mostest." Gen. N.B. Forrest. Logistics summed up in 6 words. NATO has already BADLY blown the "firstest" part. Advanced weapons systems should have been delivered to Ukraine MONTHS ago. Let's hope the dithering, delaying bureaucrats at NATO wake up and do the "mostest" part effectively. To do so, NATO must pour massive amounts of kit and munitions into Ukraine continuously until every orc is driven out of Ukraine.
Yeah, that's if we wanted ukraine to win right away.. it's in America's best interest that Russia dies of a thousand cuts while we turn our attention to China.
The EU must have its own unified military with soldiers from every country in the union to fight for its own sovereignty with 450 million people and the euro stronger than the US dollar this is their time
@duncan smith can you remind me again who invaded who? Sources on these weapons being destroyed? Because I feel like if that were true the conscripted slaves that were on Snake Island would have something to say.. if they could..
Severodonestk just fell a week ago and lysychansk has fallen yesterday. siversk is experiencing heavy fighting today and is on the verge if collapse withing the next 48 hours....the title of this video is odd.
It seems to me Ukraine didn't even put up a fight for lysychansk, they already gave up donbass. But it's gonna be a lot harder for Russia once they push to the west, perhaps Kramatorsk & Sloviansk will fall too but then they will be haltered.
Look up the term Phyrric victory. The loss of high end equipment and officers is also not something that can be easily reversed. At present Russia is prevailing as it can simply bring a considerably greater weight of firepower to bear than Ukraine can, but that has its limits, and Russia is fighting a war of conquest (the war the Russians were arguiing at the start of this, despite all evidence, that they weren't fighting) against a nation that knows if it loses, it loses it's identity. It's a war of choice for Russia, and existential fight for Ukraine. Once it is done, even if Russia keeps its acquired gains simply for lack of ability of Ukraine to force them out, it will struggle to target anyone else for quite a while, it simply doesn't have the industrial capacity.
@@JohnSmith-gd2fg problem is russia can easily change itself to produce the hardware it needs. Russia supplies the world with the raw Materials needed to produce. Ask it needs is reorganize to go from raw metals to actual equipment
I agree. As much as I want to see putins Russia lose. They're still clawing ground, be that at a small scale. Personally the west should be doing twice as much. 4 HIMARS in one package simply isnt enough.
@@karabenomar Yep in your dreams 💤 Russia is a paper bear in decline. An aging population. I doubt there will even be a Country called Russia soon. A gas station with Soviet era Nukes. All this through a Soviet obsessed ego maniac 👍🏻
Russias gain in Ukraine last month since the end of May was 0.3% extra of Ukraine. Even though it is a heavy toll they're still gaining land. NATO must do more.
@duncan smith if demilitarization of Ukraine was really Pootin’s goal, then they have failed miserably! UAF are now 3-4x more numerous than they were in February!
@duncan smith not sure of the casualty toll to be honest, I know Ukraine are saying about 140K Russian casualties so far (makes sense as for every death there are 3 injured, so if theres 35k killed theres 105k injured). But with the fact that RU are throwing 40-50K artillery shells a day down range compared to UKR 5-6K shells. It doesnt look good. places like Germany need to show more commitment.
You have to remember what will happen when the weather starts to get colder and wetter. When the military of Russia is sitting in the nice four and five mile convoy and out of fuel, how many troops and tanks are going to be ripped apart
When weather get colder Russia will have all goals complete already. Then they will be in defense mode a wait for Ukrainian tanks stuck in mud. Also EU will start to cry for gas and will forget to supply UA with weapons. Picture is so clear you just need to open your eyes.
@Michael Gratton It's obvious now that Russia fights against Nato, not against Ukraine. It will take longer to finish all goals,but once liberates Bakhmut, most of the goals will be complete :)
you forget that now ukraine candidate join the eu and to become a full member the country must be conflict free this means that the russians must be driven back to the historical borders of the country. this also means that the full eu will continue to support ukraine until this is achieved is a member of the eu and to become a full member the country must be conflict free, meaning that the russians must be pushed back to the country's historic borders. this also means that the full eu will continue to support ukraine until this is achieved
@@boymande So another destroyed town it will have to spend Billions to rebuild, the infrastructure and Industry they are destroying they will never be able to afford to rebuild
@@thundereagle4130 wrong cypress is in a dormant conflict that is quite different from an armed conflict or war it is a very complicated story but a country must not have had any armed conflicts in the year before accession have no claim to territory from other countries and acquired territory by annexation must be returned to the belonging country two years before accession. this does not apply to land that has belonged to the land for more than two hundred years. this is one of the reasons why turkey is not allowed to join the eu
The issue here is oil and gas. The timing is unfortunate but necessary in his mind. The wounds of the ussr were still quite raw when oil and gas were discovered in ukraine, therefore the ukrainians would likely let anyone but russia exploit it. Indeed, the americans started to extract oil and gas in ukraine. This situation was not good for russia who invade the donbas to get it instead as they likely wanted no competition.
Ukrain is loosing, civilians dying, citizens displaced and there infrastructures damaged. All NATO is doing is prolonging the war to see if we can weaking Russian. We are not helping the Ukrainian people instead we are using them to fight our battle.
There is no amount of weapons the west can provide that could allow Ukraine to win this conflict by military means. Zero chance. Thus, more military aid only prolongs and extends the suffering of the Ukrainian people. Reaching for peace ASAP is the only sensible way to go. unfortunately, peace doesn’t make the military industrial complex richer
As a member of NATO that doesn't have a common border with Russia, the UK has admirably given Ukraine plenty of weapons but only in relation to other NATO members. The UK should feel free to give Ukraine more since it's prefereable that those weapons by used on a Ukrainian battlefiedl than on a UK battlefield. Weapons to Ukraine are not wasted or in any way some kind of lesser use than in the hands of a UK soldier. And, other countries should give Ukraine based on same prindpicles... That it's far better for the Russians to be fouight on Ukraine's soil than on any members's soil.
How many of your 300 tanks and 200 fast jet do you think you should give away? BEtter check the numbers befor you start giving all your stuff away. western europe has been playing parasite off of US defense in the past couple decades. None of you have any serious weapons to give. You already do not have enough.
For Russia to be bringing munitions back from its neighbors to resupply the front indicates a problem for them, one bridge stands between success or failure in the south east
What I found interesting was that the interviewed expert said, it would take Russia many years to build back their military power after the current losses in the Ukraine. Looking at history (and speaking from a perspective of a German) we were able to build back our military power completely and even surpass WW1 level within 20 years even though we were under very heavy sanctions, forced payments as dictated by the treaty of Versailles - not to mention the world economic crises of the 1920s. The above mentioned economic situation was to such an extent that many thousands died of hunger in the inter war years. This brings me to the conclusion that Russia possibly does not need all that much time to rebuild its military power, even if they are under sanctions (?...)
Making dumb inaccurate artillery etc vastly different than modern weapons albeit you're right Russia could easily replenish it's stocks, as it's mostly WWII era.
This so called 'expert' hasn't got a clue. No.1 Russia has only dedicated 15% of their total military inventory for the military operation in Ukraine. No.2 Russia has NOT declared war on Ukraine or fully mobilised for war. No.3 Russia was ask by leaders of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions for help to stop Ukrainian shelling of civilian areas. Ukraine was also increasing troop numbers for a full invasion of the Donbass before Russia started building up troops on Ukraine's border. No.4 Ukraine has been committing ethnic cleansing in the Donbass for the last 8 years killing over 10,000 Donbass civilians which is FULLY supported by the West as is the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in Israel. No.5 Majority of Russian military equipment used was older post-soviet equipment like the T-72 tanks and older. Russia only just sent one of the first T-90's to Ukraine the other week and ZERO T-14 Armata's have been sent for example. No.6 Russia has used more cruise missiles in 4 months than what the USA can manufacture in a whole year. FACT: Russia can maintain this level of ammunition and cruise missile production indefinitely. No.7 Western manufacturing for ammo and missiles can NOT keep pace with Russia's large manufacturing base. Refer to the Duran and The new Atlas for far more accurate analysis rather than a Muppet regurgitating Western propaganda like a dumb parrot. No.8 Ukraine's military is being grind down and crushed, over 11,000 Ukrainian military units now destroyed which is over half their inventory. The West is being defeated economically (mainly due to their own reckless reactionary incompetent measures, which has only exacerbated Western economic woes) to the point the liberal world order is now in question.
The “cost” is not exactly the cost. Most times that billion isn’t going into things like hospitals. It’s being wasted on fancy military experiments that won’t be used or to send to tanks to Egypt that they’ll never use let alone unpack.
What blows me away is the west is running out of munitions supporting a regional conflict. What happens when there is a wider conflict? The weapons have gotten so sophisticated they take months/years to replace. The P-51 mustang went from a sketch to a working prototype in less than 90 days. The F-35 required over 10 years to develop. If there ever was a "hot war" I think these weapon systems lifespans would be measured in weeks. After that we are back to the P-51 Mustang
During a hot war the economy of every NATO country will switch to a war economy. Which basically means a lot of people will either be drafted as a soldier or be send to ammo factories. Also every workshop that has any capacity to make bullets, bombs or engines will basically be confiscated by the government. So yeah a lot of bad stuff people will only accept when they are directly in danger of being bombed/occupied.
@@thundereagle4130 With today's tech they won't be able to manufacture the systems fast enough to replace what's been destroyed in the field. Warfare will quickly be reduced to rifles and bullets. Training personal alone to use all this stuff takes years. God save us if they build robot armies, humanity will cease to exist
You mean nations that sold all their stuff and stopped building are running out. All of a sudden that Trump guy knew what he was talking about when he was going around saying western europe were parasites off of US defense and NATO was a waste for us. Another CHarity case for US taxpayers who are 30 trillion in debt and now beginning to starve. Now it's time to pay the piper and western europE's cupbords are bare and dusty. 200 tanks and 200 fast jets each just doesn't cut it. When Germany France and England combined don't have even 50% of the number of tanks and jets as the former united states, I smell us getting F- ed as usual.
Why do these videos loop the same thing twice, exactly? It felt like I was going crazy on one video, now after hearing it in another one I'm questioning your own sanity
Killing innocent peoples is never forgiven ever, there will be a price to pay. Ukraine is fighting a one sided war, defensive, whilst russia is fighting a offensive war and bullying and killing people, genocide.
How much did the Russians pay ? They now have more land . Ukraine should be proud of defeat and loss of their nation ? Most Ukrainains will not come back to Ukraime ? I wish you where in thier shoes so that you can be proud. I believe you are from UK. Pray that is happem to your country so that you can be proud
@@celestineoc1123 I am proud . Millions of Ukraines have left there home in fear , that speaks for its self . And to fight against a country the don't want war ,then forced into war . That like kicking a man whist he's down . Would Russia have done this if Ukraine had nukes .
@@knutkatastrophe2722 There are significant signs that the Russian forces are weakening. The Ukraine will be a major problem for Russia now for decades to come. They will be chipping away at Russia for years, backed financially and militarily by the west. Russia has made it's bed and now must lie on it. It's just a shame that Putin will take the people of Russia down with him.
The analyst is wrong. He is focusing too much on Putin. But Putin exist within a cultural context, the one you can easily see on the State Media and the bellicose diatribes of those who speak there. This means that if Russia (the country, not its president) gets away with territorial gains in Ukraine (beyond the ones they already got before 2022) even after the whole West parade of sanctions and loud charade of support (many that didn’t materialize on due time) then the famous NATO deterrence is left lest terrible, lest fearsome. Russia is already making deals with China and India (and others) to have them as main consumers of their fossil fuels and those are huge countries that are growing, what means that they can easily replace Europe’s consumption. Plus those other countries aren’t that friendly with the West. 20 years for a single individual is a long time, for a nation is merely another step for the next war if there is not a clear defeat or a change on the sociopolitical building of a country: that’s what happened with Germany after WWI: it simply prepared for the second world war, even after losing, due to internal struggles (plus the indecisiveness of Europe due to the advance of communism in Russia as they thought as strong Germany could deter it). Some people think that Russia should be strong to deter China on the Far East. The West got addicted to the prosperity that came after the fall of Soviet Union as there was no longer the Cold War and they thought they could divert military expenses on more useful social spending than to prevent a collapsed enemy to get up again, as they thought that it was about communism alone: it wasn’t. It was a geostrategic stance that superseded communism. And Russia would reclaim what it sees as its natural place in Europe and the world.
One big consideration is the vast amount of military knowledge that has been gained from this war. First, the concept of separate treatment of non combatants has been completely discarded by eastern governments and military leaders. Entire cities of millions have been mercilessly razed to secure advantage. We saw it first in Syria, now on our own doorstep. Second, in spite of the apparent ubiquity of modern communication systems, the power of propaganda can still guide and energise the vast majority of public opinion and backing in the aggressor nation. Third, the concept of mechanised Blitzkrieg, unless much more carefully planned and executed is no longer valid in Europe, especially when opposed with smart precision munitions and unmanned air support. Fourth, artillery, the technology that revolutionised warfare hundreds, even thousands of years ago, is still a powerful tool, especially if you no longer care about avoiding civilian casualties, as now seems to be the case where Russia is concerned. Fifth, a motivated, professional and well equipped national army can withstand a conventional invasion surprisingly well, even against seemingly overwhelming power. NATO will need to take all of these learnings into consideration when planning for future hardware and training. It has already saved trillions in avoiding purchases that have been shown up as little more than a dictator’s toy chest. So let’s take this opportunity to thank the Ukrainians now for these future savings. Give them what they need to achieve the kind of military success that will also make possible a Western political victory (I.e. restoration of a real, sustainable democracy in Russia)
Rapid mobile warfare is always valid, and always will be. When properly executed, men on foot with hand-held weapons have no ability to stop it. You do need control of the air though, or at least rough parity, to make deep tank strikes work...........a real army could upend Russia's artillery-heavy, slowly-grinding-forward approach pretty quickly through a deep drive behind enemy lines, surrounding the artillery and men near the front.
The lesson I'm getting is that mass artillery bombardments are ineffective in comparison to smaller numbers of artillery carrying out precision strikes. What is the point of wasting ammunition to carpet an area when a few shells or rockets can take out selected targets. The Ukrainians are able to take out strategic targets at long range now. With sufficient numbers of precision weapons they could systematically destroy Russian artillery and command centres while relatively safe from return fire.
@@nerdyali4154 Alistair, I think (hope) that you will be proved correct when and if the promised systems are deployed in sufficient volume, if it is not too late. But to me it seems we haven’t really seen the full effect of this phase of the war yet, apparently down to either lack of training or foot dragging by western governments or probably some of each. And again, the results from introduction of this capability will be keenly observed by NATO strategists who will then be better able to tailor their hardware purchasing programs to better economic effect. But it will still be Ukrainian blood that will continue to be shed. My point is that the West should double down on the supply of these weapons, not only because it is the morally correct action, but also, selfishly, to see how well they work in a real, large scale life and death scenario.
@@nerdyali4154 Ukraine is losing badly. Western media is simply out of touch with reality. The resistance has collapsed. UA backbone is broken by Russians. In fact as a nato commander, I would be very worried looking at overwhelming superiority of Russian artillery.
@@realnapster1522 western media is generally not saying Ukraine is winning. They do like to emphasize ukranian wins (snake island). This war is not indicative of how nato would fight Russia. Actually, after seeing how poorly the Russian Air Force has performed I suspect nato air forces are even more confident in their air superiority tactics. If Ukraine had nato caliber Air Force, they’d quickly crush the artillery advantage of Russia. Heck Russia has already had to pull back its navy because western arms, and the himars are causing Russia to push back its command centers. This is nothing but a proxy war and nato is capturing immense intelligence on the poor state of Russian army, equipment and tactics….without losing a single nato soldier
With only 120K soldiers and against 400K NATO trained Ukrainians, Russians have done pretty well. Ukraine has been winning this war since day 1 but only in the news.
I think it's 180 to 200k Russian soldiers vs 250k professional UA soldiers and over 300k (not sure about last number) territorial defense. Your comment is the first sensible one I saw in this section and I had to scroll for a while. 100% true, Ukraine is winning just in the media. People should check non western sources before making those silly comments
But Russia is only weeks away from getting the whole of the Donbas and the land bridge. This can be called a victory and it looks very unlikely that Ukraine will be able to get any territory back. I also dispute that Putin ever intended to invade the whole of the Ukraine. I would suggest that you do a search for John Mearsheimer for much more detail.
All of Europe should have declared a state of emergency in response to Russia's invasion. That was the minimum step needed to get the general public to understand the seriousness of the situation. Instead, our governments all like to pretend that we can continue as normal, in political and economic terms, while at the same time engaging in military support for Ukraine and economic warfare against Russia. We have huge costs to face for both the support and the sanctions, and by not having a state of emergency we leave our politics wide open to a popular backlash against the costs incurred. That is something Putin and his supporters will exploit mercilessly, driving as much unrest as possible across Europe to reduce or even negate the support for Ukraine. Ukraine might seem like a country far, far away. But so was Czechoslovakia 1938.
The cost ? I have my Family safe - food in the cupboards - a roof over my head. Yes cost of living is up and there's nothing much left BUT I support and admire ukrain plus my countries support
Is this a joke? Ukraine has absolutely ZERO say so in their fate at this point. Russia fought this battle on its own terms. The cost has been perfectly acceptable to them. Their intention was to destroy the Ukraine military and it has done that handily.
@@mattdonna9677 Lol. Says who? Russia has NEVER conducted any military operation like that. Keep reaching for face saving victories. The fact is NATO tried to bully a country that had a lot stiffer left hook than any of them dreamed.
There's not really an alternative to support Ukraine to the bitter end. Russia will only become more dangerous and aggressive if not given appropriate opposition. Really the western powers should not have pledged not to support Ukraine with troops.
The cost of backing Ukraine fully (to get back all it's land) will be immense, the cost of not backing Ukraine will be incalculable.
Every penny, dime, pence, and euro will be money well spent. Russia is being taken out of the picture as an aggressive nation and won't be a superpower after this. It will just be a big country with nukes. That's priceless.
They can't get their land back. By the time weapons arrive it will take months to learn how to use. Ukraine has no pathway to victory.
agreed...A Putin win would inspire more hot headed people around the world
Oh really... most probably didn't know Ukraine existed few months ago. Nuclear war sounds cliché until it really starts happening. For what?
@duncan smith you definitely would have been on Germany’s side in 1939! Despicable!
The cost of simply allowing Russia to take Ukraine will only lead to more of the same. It is unfortunate, but there is no option apart from defeating Putin.
Exactly! Well said.
Spot on
This is true, if you don’t act you are only encouraging the despot
@@wonkygustav4457 .....and others Step forward China next if Putin is seen to win. China (and others are complicit in this war because of their tacit support
@@mikependleton1296 until humans stop being so ignorant and choose to think for themselves they will continue to destroy themselves.
Let's also not forget that Putin's intentions for his military clearly extended far beyond Ukraine. Right before he invaded Ukraine in February, Putin was demanding that NATO pull back out of ALL Eastern Europe. Leaving The Baltic States, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Czechia and Slovakia possibly later targets for Putin invasion.
Putin had vast ambitions, but his military has been an almost total fail in Ukraine. Now with NATO budgets greatly increased, two incoming new members with Finland and Sweden and the announcement of a 300,000 strong NATO rapid reaction force, the possibility of Putin extending his Russian empire deep into Europe is almost certainly over.
So why do you not send the 300,000 strong NATO rapid reaction force to save Ukraine annihilation ? Cowardice perhaps ?
And I can asure you, Sweden and Finland are lightyears ahead of ukrainian military defense. Sweden have the best submarines in the world, a very strong airforce and Finlands army are the strongest in Europe. They have been prepared for war with russia since the end of ww2, so these 2 nations in Nato will be a gigantic lift.
@@johnadam2885 It's not cowardice to not want to start WW III.
@@Northman-from-the-North 100%
@@johnadam2885 NATO does not have a 300,000 rapid reaction force. It currently has 40,000 troop in high readiness for the DEFENSE OF NATO MEMBER NATIONS. Ukraine is NOT A NATO MEMBER. Cowardice has nothing to do with NATO non-intervention in Ukraine.
Not sure they’ve “Ripped the guts out”, but have certainly given it a reality check in terms of it’s capability, the costs associated with invading a neighbour and also the danger of underestimating the resolve of those determined to stop you succeeding. Russia will be paying for this for years, if not decades.
I think "Rip the guts out" was more of the world's perception of the Russian Military and it's capabilities. The world was shocked how incompetent Russia was against a vastly weaker military such as Ukraine. On paper it should have had this in the bag, but it certainly didn't expect that resolve. Russia claims to be the 2nd most powerful military in the world, yet after the initial surge it has taken very little ground in the last three months of conflict.
That's what none of these people understand that the Ukrainians have the advantage of their country they're not going anywhere and if anybody has any delusions that the Russians are going to just be able to call a ceasefire and live peacefully on their occupied territory and the Ukrainians are just going to stop attacking them and fighting guerrilla warfare and the Russians being a target every day are out of their minds, because they certainly will be targets every second of every day the Ukrainians are never going to stop with Putin's continuing to attack civilians the Ukrainians just hate him more and more and more they will NEVER negotiate with Putin.
@@The31stcenturyfox A weaker Ukraine ? For 8 years US/NATO have used billions in order to create an Ukrainien army comparable to that of NATO. Weapons, training, US intelligence + fortification of Eastern Ukraine is not a "weak" Ukraine.
@@ellengran6814 Until February 24, 2022, NATO had provided very little support to Ukraine. They began the war with weapons inherited from the USSR, not western weapons.
@@ellengran6814 you don't get much for your billions in terms of military spending. They were on paper a lot weaker in terms of hardware. It has shown that wars are not just about hardware though. Russia's military are much weaker now that's for sure.
Coming from an Australian, I'm so glad to see the west so united like I haven't seen in my lifetime. Bullying is no longer acceptable in today's world.
So who are the worst bullies in the world ?
Yeah the west is very united.Thats why Hungary is still buying Russian oil and gas.
Lol... You can't be serious. Iraq Afghanistan Libya Yemen Syria Vietnam... Who was bombing them again?
@@VicMansaMusa erm i think russia pretty much pounded syria into rubble
The US did, they even ran out of bombs. Plus, Russia was invited while the US invaded as usual
Democracies: Send the brave 'Ukes' everything they need pronto; let them finish the job Putin started. Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦🇨🇦!!
🇺🇸🦅⚔️
Defeating Russia is as existential to the west as it is for to consolidate is twisted idea of "russian empire".
Cheers from Portugal.
Speak for yourself. I don't care who runs Ukraine.
@@Withnail1969 - aren't you dark and edgy - and useless
@@Withnail1969 Sure, but you should realise that your brand of snivelling self interest is the exception rather than the rule, thankfully.
@@Withnail1969 All it takes for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing. You can claim indifference, which is actually ignorance, but you can't step a foot outside your door without having an effect on others around you.
@@Withnail1969 You are a toilet trader!
If the west doesnt suport Ukraine.Your basicaly giving Russia confidence to continue with their aggression.So they must continue to suport them no matter the cost and no matter the amount of time needed
agree 100%
Ukraine has already lost this war. Much of western media and public is out of touch with reality. Watch some neutral sources.
@@realnapster1522 neutral sources?is there such a source.Any media has picked sides
you obviously don't know what you are talking about.
Sounds insane
Part of the issue with the Russian military and why it fails in modern mobile warfare is the culture that hides facts from lower ranks and does not give them independence in making decisions. Hence so many dead generals. Arguably the only way to change that is for Russia to adopt a more open culture but of course once Russia does that Russians get to see the stupidity of the war and how immoral it is. In short if Russia wants a better educated military it isn't going to be able to mount these kind of imperialistic attacks on its neighbours.
It is gaining ground in the Donbas.
I don't see it being defeated easily if oil and gas prices remain at record levels.Russia is awash with hard cash and has big numbers
@@Marvin-dg8vj You can't fund morale to fight with money for infinite periods.
Another issue is that they seem to have only two genders whereas other countries have a pool of seven genders
Fails? Are you watching a different movie? Does anyone really believe that Russia intended to capture he whole of Ukraine with a force of 100-200K men? Is this guy for real? He probably was told that we've all been lobotomized.
Hahaha Russian military is not Failing!!! Why don’t the US UK send troops??? Because they will lose! YOU have got no idea
Little Vlad must retire. Russia is better off without him 👍🤠
Dude, it's Russia, there is no better, they don't know any better, they were raised that way.
He owns Ruusia. This is his gas he's getting young Russians to die for. It's all for him.
@@MitchDonovan only they'll have real trouble still selling that gas or oil for a decent prize, or even transporting it.
The west and NATO is simply not doing enough. The west should supply air defence, and long range artillery is huge numbers.
Ukraine has already lost this war. Much of western media and public is out of touch with reality. Watch some neutral sources.
The west doesn't have long range artillery in huge numbers.The numbers are available. The west relies on US air, not artillery by the tens of thousands.
A10 Warthogs. Brrrrrrrrrrrrt!!
Totally don’t agree with the interviewee. Russia will go further after some time, not right away, but definitely will, if it is not stopped now. And it will be a much greater problem for the whole world.
Russia fights with just 15% of its army against a huge American puppet and takes 20% of heavily protected territory in 4 months. The US faught 20 years in Afghanistan but eventually got kicked by Taliban supported by in fact almost nobody.
Listen to your ignorance
Yes! You are right!
They have to be definitely stopped now.
Russia does not forgive defeats and does not abandon its imperialist plans. Because they are the only thing it has!
We have to destroy Russia, before it destroys us. That's the truth. Maybe sad for someone. But better to be sad now than after the West's defeat.
@david healy 🧟🦠
@david healy Nato expansion is just an excuse for Putin. Dictators need excuses to justify their sick ideas and hate. Putin hates Ukraine because its people don't want to be his slaves. He can not stand USSR is gone and Ukraine is not his backyard anymore. Joining Nato it's a choice of every independent state and it's not Russia to decide about it. Why should we care abou Putin's paranoia and excuses? Ukraine gave up its nukes and Russia was supposed to respect Ukraine's independence and borders according to Budapest deal. Nato never attacked Russia, Ukraine never attacked Russia, its Russia who keeps invading neighbors.
The UK could soften the financial blow of supporting Ukraine by reversing all the tax cuts it's given to the rich who've transferred the money they've saved into off shore accounts.
Russia should pay for the damage they have done , plain and simple .
Keep in mind that NATO weapons stockpiles may start to run low in the near future, but that's nothing compared to the state of Russian weapons stock. Putin has mostly run out of precision guided missiles not to mention +300 killed Russian officers ranks from captain to general.
Also let's not forget that the majority of the weapons that the West has been supplying to Ukraine are from old stocks of Soviet weaponry. Once those have been used up, higher tech Western weapons will be coming on line. That hopefully will be the turning point in this war of attrition.
😂Russians running out of everything 😂 ... go away and have yet another J Arthur while you're waiting.
to be fair, russian leadership has been so inept - is it actually a loss to lose such incompetent officers?
It's hard to believe words from an actor 😂
Then again if US would really push a full on war time production, there would be a silly amount of steel
Making threats, and not having the will nor the capacity to carry them out, is a pure rookie mistake.
Telling others what you're going to do is a bad idea.
NATO is set ready to rock and roll,at the border now waiting waiting and waiting Russians soldiers turn the other direction 🤣
Russia is winning this war
There is worse mistake: making threats and having will to carry them out and lacking ability to do so.
It’s what happens when you believe your own propaganda.
Shouldn’t it be pointed out that Russia promised to never invade Ukraine as party of the Ukraine turned its nukes back to Russia?
@@backsync613 the answer is yes to both.
NATO said it wouldn't expand. The west said it wouldn't get involved in Russia's sphere of influence. Lots of things are said, but when psychopaths are left unchecked, everything goes out the window.
@@MikeBrown-go1pc it’s no doubt in my mind who’s in the wrong and should be dissolved. It’s only a matter of time and there will be no Russia.
@@backsync613 Yes, so we can say Russia reneged on its protection and recognition of Ukraine.
And we can say at all times from 2004 and agression by Russia until the present time that Ukraine had no protection from NATO.
So were countries like Poland et al wise to join NATO or not?
We see countries not under NATO protection systematically being bullied by Putin, while NATO members enjoy the protection from NATO.
Most critics of NATO criticise it for its brutality and not for its inaction.
For example when it overran Iraq the losses for Iraq were difficult to estimate but we know they were apocalyptic.
@@jfryer485 Didn't really need a NATO for Iraq 1991. Most of the world that had a military was involved in that one with even a small platoon just to show real support. Everyone would have been in, NATO or no. You don't need defense agreements to help your friends or do what you believe is right.
I'm guessing if Russia were to roll into Poland, article 5 would immediately take effect, so I'm thinking it's a good thing for them.
Now is the time Georgia to get your land back.
At least stop putin from moving the border fence.
Yes, and maybe also time for the Belarusian opposition to stage another uprising. Lukashenko must be on shaky political ground now.
@@larrysteinke1839 Absolutely. Its just a matter of time. Once Putin falls, Lukashenko falls. And maybe Belarus will also rather look west than east.
Keep dreaming UKraine is going back to Russia and there’s nothing pathetic little nato is going to do anything about it.
@Ace point. yes, i'm sure they have a few scores to settle with the Russian invaders.
The weapons were purchased to fight Russia in the first place, so not that much of a problem to draw down stockpiles a lot.
Exactly. It doesn't matter who pulls the trigger, so long as the investment is being used for its primary purpose - defending against dumb Russian aggression
Much better given to Ukraine to use up on the targets the taxpayers paid for them to be built for, than have them get old and obsolete and scrapped. If current ordnance and kit is being drawn down, get the manufacturers to build more. This is a much a world reset as the 2001 attacks were. Time to forget the renewables stupidity and get back to cheap energy and major strategic manufacturing in the west.
Yes, we are reducing our stocks of weapons by sending them to Ukraine, but remember that this is our war as well, and this is what the weapons are for. So we need to just get on with it.
People acting like these weapons made in the cold war weren't for the russians smh
Every russian tank destroyed in ukraine is one less tank to take on NATO with.
Oh really. This is not "our war" . We ain't seen nothin yet.
@@defaultuser9423 Well since russian troops & weapons get destroyed by western/nato supplied stuff, it's certainly "our war" too in some ways, and russia sees it too.
NOT my war, I can't remember saying I'd be happy to go to war for a comedian
Slava Ukraini
ukraine the abject zionist regime will lose soon.
Who else would you use your weapons against, if not Putin? And where? NATO as a whole still has plenty!
Only US and Turkey have anything. Europe keeps around 200 tanks and 175 fast jets each. They are literally parasites off of US defense these days in terms of numbers of pieces. Iff you think we should give all of our tanks and jets we have in numbers to Ukraine, you are crazy. Remember how many pieces of equipment it took just to rather quickly beat up Iraq in 1991.
Ukraine has certainly embarrassed Russia's' military, but haven't ripped its guts out just yet. Hopefully their offensive in the South will change things soon.
What Ukraine did were wiping s**t from russias arsh.. look at the equipment that have been destroyed... 90% are soviet era
Jou means Ukraine and thé whole nato
No one is emberrassed. What was embarassing is US losing in vietnam and afghanistan after 20 years of fighting. Russia, while it could have performed better, is still meeting its main goals without full mobilazation and with usage of mainly old equipement. The world hasnt seen a conflict like this in decades. This is advanced warfare compared to wars US faught in recent years. People who expected russia to just take ukraine (second largest country in europe) in 2 days are not living in real world. And no, russias government never said russia is gonna take ukraine in 2 days. A common myth.
@@adembajramov3539 nope Ukraine with lend lease equipment from western countries, Russia loves to try to spin it as a conflict with NATO to justify being out fought by a smaller country where most of the equipment is of a lower specification than Russia’s. Considering that Russia had a Navy + strategic airforce + standoff weapons they’ve performed laughably.
After 19 years since the beginning of the invasion of Iraq, has the West forgotten this war?
The Iraq war is said to have resulted in 1 million deaths the difference is russia have weapons of mass destruction
A message to the future generations never make russia feel threatened
the difference between "looking dangerous" and "being dangerous".Russia
describes military doctrine as defensive military doctrine. With regard
to nuclear weapons specifically, Russia reserves the right to use
nuclear weapons: in response to the use of nuclear and other types of
weapons of mass destruction against it or its allies,in case of
aggression against Russia with the use of conventional weapons when the
very existence of the state is threatened
Russia has the World's Largest Bomber
As of 2022, the Federation of American Scientists estimates that Russia possesses 5,977 nuclear weapons, while the United States has 5,428; Russia and the U.S. each have about 1,600 active deployed strategic nuclear warheads.
Russia has the most nuclear weapons of any country, at 6,257. Of these, 1,458 are active, meaning they are already deployed, 3,039 are available (can be deployed if needed) and 1,760 are retired (out of use and awaiting dismantlement
How do Russian nuclear weapons compare to the rest of the world?
Russia - 6,257
America 5,550
UK - 225
France - 290
China - 350
Israel - 90
Pakistan - 165
India - 156
North Korea - 40
When you tell the truth it's always gonna be controversial.
sar Bomba, (Russian: “King of Bombs”) , byname of RDS-220, also called Big Ivan, Soviet thermonuclear bomb that was detonated in a test over Novaya Zemlya island in the Arctic Ocean on October 30, 1961. The largest nuclear weapon ever set off, it produced the most powerful human-made explosion ever recorded.
Russia's Tsar bomba: World's most powerful nuclear weapon of mass destruction. The Tsar bomba exploded about 4 km above the ground and reportedly produced a mushroom cloud 60 km high
However, the Soviet Union developed three AN602 physics packages at 101.5 megatons (Mt) and these are more powerful than the Tsar Bomba, which was downscaled to 51 Mt before being used RDS-220 Vanya.
it was modified to yield 50 megatons, which was estimated to be about 3,800 times the strength of the U.S. bomb dropped on Hiroshima during World War II
The declassified study from the scientists at the Los Alamos laboratory, published in 1947 had first shed light on the question that how many nuclear bombs it would take to destroy the world. According to the study, it would take about ten to a hundred 'super nukes' to end humanity
plus see this NATO attack:
14,500 have died in Libya
165,000 have died in Afghanistan
224,000 have died in Syria
1,200,000 killed in Iraq
It did not shock anyone.
None of these countries received approval.
Russia's killing of 200 Ukrainian troops came as a shock. Human pain overflowed.
Does NATO have any right to blame Russia at all
The 10 Most Powerful Nuclear Bombs
RDS-220 Hydrogen Bomb-"Tsar Bomba" (50 Megatons)
B41 (25 Megatons)
TX-21 "Shrimp" (14.8 Megatons)
Mk-17 (10 to 15 Megatons)
Mk-24 (10 to 15 Megatons)
"Ivy Mike" H-Bomb (10.4 Megatons)
Mk-36 (10 Megatons)
B53 (9 Megatons)
Mk-16 (7 Megatons)
Mk-14 (6.9 Megatons
USA bombing list : the democracy world tour
-Korea and China 1950-1953
(Korean War)
-Guatemala 1954
-Indonesia 1958
-Cuba 1959-1961
-Guatemala 1960
-Congo 1964
-Laos 1964-1973
-Vietnam 1961-1973
-Cambodia 1969-1970
-Guatemala 1967-1969
-Grenada 1983
-Lebanon 1983-1984
(both lebanese and syrian targets)
-Libya 1986
-Elsavador 1980s
-Nicaragua 1980s
-Iran 1987
-Panama 1989
-Iraq 1991 (persian gulf war)
-Kuwait 1991
-Somalia 1993
-Bosnia 1994-1995
-Sudan 1998
-Afghanistan 1998
-Yugoslavia 1999
-Yemen 2002
-Iraq 1991-2003
(US/UK on reguler basis)
-Iraq 2003-2015
-Afghanistan 2001-2015
-Pakistan 2007-2015
-Somalia 2007-8 and 2011
-Yemen 2009 and 2011
-Libya 2011 and 2015
-Syiria 2014-2015
Never forget who's the real threat to the world !!
This guy has been smokin' the really good stuff.
Putler has been engaged in asymmetric warfare against democracies since before he came to power - we didn't start this but us democracies need to finish it once and for all in Ukraine. Get on with it and supply the weapons and get it done - we have great fighters in Ukraine - they just need the tools.
20 years of corruption and greed can do a lot of harm to an army.
and to EUROPE too
@@kukulroukul4698 all militaries have corruption but most western militaries have safeguards set in place to catch it before it gets too bad.
One trillion $ for a aircraft program. That's 20 times the entire Russian defense budget. So 🍻 cheers🍻
Based on the Russian advances in eastern Ukraine due to lack of sufficent Ukrainian equipment and ammunition, the current result is expected. It could change if the West promptly provides the needed equipment and ammunition. Ukraine has the necessary and intelligent manpower. Let’s not repeat the mistakes of previous years.
???? Part of the mistakes of the previos years was messing around in Russias sphere of influence though.
@@MikeBrown-go1pc Is that what Pravda told YOU? You either forgot or are IGNORANT that when the Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons to Russia, Russia, the USA and Britain GUARANTEED to PROTECT the Ukraine! Russia of course didn't do that since Putin is STILL a KGB murderer with NO HONOR!
@@MikeBrown-go1pc really? Taking down terror camps was a mistake? I agree that involvement in syria might have been a mistake as interference and manipulation by unknown parties had the west thinking that the syrian govt was out of control for a while.
Probably you should also learn how to clone Ukrainian soldiers and send them to the East.
@@MikeBrown-go1pc which justified an undercover operation from russian army(which they denied 100 times, only after they annexed crimea they said it was all true)? We have a civilized society today, the false flag wars from russia are with nothing to justify.
Im not being bombarded, still have my house and cars, have a job, my son son is not going to war,.........i m not complaining about the gas prices for a good reason...these peoples need help NOW!!!!!
The cost of letting puttin win is far higher.
I keep seeing this. What is that cost?
@@MikeBrown-go1pc Putin will try more land grabs in the future, and potentially attack other countries. Better to smash the Russian army now when it's on the back foot, and render it ineffective for future illegal wars.
@@MikeBrown-go1pc Perhaps Nato having to fight Russia, but they couldn't win that battle anyway so.
@@bekeneel If US and NATO launched a high end air campaign on the scale of 1991 Iraq with today's planes on Russian forces in Ukraine, Russians would think aliens were attacking. Even years later, they still would not be able to tell what happened besides they were forced to abandon their campaign.
Their only hope would be S-300,S-400 and BUK which my money is on US knowing where most are and they would be hit with swarms of cruise missiles, air jamming, drones and stealth aircraft. Their systems would be completely overwhelmed.
"Americans, indeed ALL FREE MEN, remember that in the final choice a soldier's pack is not so heavy a burden as a prisoner's chains." ... Ukraine soldiers are fighting and dying so they can be FREE MEN (AND WOMEN)!!! There is a nobility in their struggle ... not in war itself, instead the burning, white heat desire to be FREE.
Thank heavens you remembered the wimmen.
Correct! They know what it is like to live under Soviet Rule and then with Pro-Russian politicians in power in Ukraine and they clearly have no desire to return to those days again! That is why they are fighting and dying to save Ukraine from the Russian Invasion.
@@richardmoloney689 YES!!! You are so right, Sir.😊
Huh! 🤔Words of wisdom my friend.
The inclusion and respect for women is a sign of a healthy democracy. And an extremely important sign at that.
Yes, winter will be cold. Yes, energy costs will be high. Every single person in the West wears a little bit. Together it's a lot. What kind of human life is this? How much does a human life cost? I like to put on a jacket in winter. Greetings from Germany
winter will be cold and old people will die from it without energy supplies.
What about Russias attention deficit disorder? War is a two way street and Russians are feeling war fatigue maybe even more than the west
Well that's there fault. They should of stayed in there own borders.
What war fatigue? Only Ukraine had mobilized men and women...
@@joselugo4536 A destroyed economy tends to irritate populations.
The only Russian who matters is Putin.
@Linus 67 It must be a terrible feeling to face 15 years in prison for calling war in Ukraine a war that it in fact is.
Real question should be, are we willing to pay the price if Putler wins.
If Russia takes Ukraine, there would likely be an interstice, while arms are built-up. Round two, Russia won’t defeat the West.
What is that price? What is winning for Russia. I know there are far greater enemies righy here at home than putin. Can't see my life changing at all if whatever Russia winning is happens.
@@MikeBrown-go1pc actually it will. The war ending will almost certainly reduce the price of fuel oil, vegetable oil and wheat, as well as wood (lots of LVL wooden beams come from Russia)
@@happyhappynuts then let's pray Russians checkmates Ukraians soon.
Gas and electricity and food may be cheaper but that's only if you let it be and lift sanctions.
But that's never going to happen
We have to pay heigh cost no matter what happens .
More guns more tanks more soldiers all paid for with price hike and tax .
"Guns and tanks and planes are nothing unless there is a solid spirit, a solid heart, and great productiveness behind it." ... Eisenhower, again ...Maybe it is important to realise the Ukrainians are fighting for their very survival!!! And this places the burden on the Free World to help Ukraine in any way we can, they possess a "solid spirit and a solid heart."
They are also nothing if the money for their maintenance finds its way into the pockets of dishonest actors.
@@bulwinkle "Despise nothing except meanness, selfishness and CORRUPTION"... "Fear nothing except disloyalty, indifference and cowardice" ... I'am a believer in the Ukrainian leadership.
@@bulwinkle "Despise nothing except meanness, selfishness and CORRUPTION" ... Fear nothing except disloyalty, indifference, and cowardice." I'am a believer in the Ukrainian leadership. Unlike Russia, I think the Ukrainians understand the 8% rule... 8% of defence spending is allocated to hardware, the rest is allocated to training their people, maintenance and a ready supply of ammunition.
wake up fool...
Indeed. I think Russia, and those that follow Russia, are hungry for more land.
This person seems very opinionated, though his ideas lack philosophical and historical grounding,. Also, cultures live and are united by values, people are willing to die for them. European leaders are united on this one for a reason. They completely miscalculated Putin.
This war has also shown how an abundance of relatively cheap, highly advanced weapons like Javelin and the manpads have mitigated a disadvantage in airforce and armour. And that artillery is still King...
Artillery is still King..yes, but advanced HIMAR guided rocket artillery has superceded conventional artillery.. Ukraine just needs more now, and Russia's whole way of way will be finished.
@@sirrodneyffing1 They don't call it "Rocket Artillery" for nothing.
“We’ll go down in history as the first society that wouldn’t save itself because it wasn’t cost-effective.” - (attributed to Kurt Vonnegut)
Yes. Russia is no longer considered a strong, conventional, military power.
Their army is still taking Ukrainian land with a scorched earth policy
Lol still is just small time war, I want to see both sides losing million soldiers and nuking themselves
Ok guy … Russian has taken Ukraines oil and gas fields… They also have control or destroyed most of their best farmland… A third or 15m people will never return to their homes…
Yep, and wrecked 1:5 of their military doing jack. Not a world power. And now they never can be.
Check the news. Russia just had another major victory in the Donbass because Ukrainian forces retreated in the face of encirclement.
Times Radio, well done. I enjoyed this. #Ukraine #PutinWarCriminal
Ukrainian troops are in high spirits and tough as nails. They are not going to give up anytime soon that is their homeland.
Looks like they have given up - the replacements are shopkeepers and lawyers and Comedians coming from Kyiv to fight - what a shock going up against the Chechens
There is no army there my dear
@@cliveengel5744 Russia has lost 1/4 of it's Army and gained no strategically important cities. Russia holds less territory now than they did at the start of the invasion and advanced weaponry is only now starting to pour into Ukraine.
@@cliveengel5744 nice story but it needs more dragons
@@cliveengel5744 The Russian MoD has not provided a Russian casualty update since March. Take an educated guess on why the refuse to do so.
❤️Ukrainian 🇬🇪
" An ADD Society ", right there is the central issue. Another issue is that our adversaries do not change governing administrations every four years.
Can America willfully, and strongly prosecute a war that would require unification of purpose without the interruption of grandstanding politics from one party or the other?
I'm not saying change our system, to the contrary. I am saying different leaders can support different means, different things, and the yo-yo effect on a serious war effort where for instance our culture, and society may be at risk, will these leaders stick to an initial plan, and fortify it?
This is what our adversaries believe we cannot do. This presents a lack of diligence and determination to follow through.
Glory to God,
Victory for Ukraine,
Rise Free Nations!
On the point of governments changing, this is actually a good thing. Putin can't mobilise because he fears the reaction. He lacks the legitimacy and the confidence that his people are behind him. He is also isolated from reality, surrounded by cronies, because he has been in power too long, which allows this to develop. Consequently, his decision making is terrible, because the information he receives is terrible.
"Get there firstest with the mostest." Gen. N.B. Forrest. Logistics summed up in 6 words. NATO has already BADLY blown the "firstest" part. Advanced weapons systems should have been delivered to Ukraine MONTHS ago. Let's hope the dithering, delaying bureaucrats at NATO wake up and do the "mostest" part effectively. To do so, NATO must pour massive amounts of kit and munitions into Ukraine continuously until every orc is driven out of Ukraine.
Orc is rampage pillaging Ukraine cities
Yeah, that's if we wanted ukraine to win right away.. it's in America's best interest that Russia dies of a thousand cuts while we turn our attention to China.
The EU must have its own unified military with soldiers from every country in the union to fight for its own sovereignty with 450 million people and the euro stronger than the US dollar this is their time
@duncan smith can you remind me again who invaded who?
Sources on these weapons being destroyed? Because I feel like if that were true the conscripted slaves that were on Snake Island would have something to say.. if they could..
@@jamesjackovich5886 how is the euro being stronger than the dollar relevant? The dollar is still king of the world.
NATO, give Putin 5 (five) days to get out of ALL OF UKRAINE!
Pure genius..thank you again for leaving nothing unturned..your a scholar of your trade craft
Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦❤️🇬🇧
Slava Ukraini Australia is with Ukraine 🇺🇦 🇦🇺
Severodonestk just fell a week ago and lysychansk has fallen yesterday. siversk is experiencing heavy fighting today and is on the verge if collapse withing the next 48 hours....the title of this video is odd.
It seems to me Ukraine didn't even put up a fight for lysychansk, they already gave up donbass. But it's gonna be a lot harder for Russia once they push to the west, perhaps Kramatorsk & Sloviansk will fall too but then they will be haltered.
Look up the term Phyrric victory.
The loss of high end equipment and officers is also not something that can be easily reversed. At present Russia is prevailing as it can simply bring a considerably greater weight of firepower to bear than Ukraine can, but that has its limits, and Russia is fighting a war of conquest (the war the Russians were arguiing at the start of this, despite all evidence, that they weren't fighting) against a nation that knows if it loses, it loses it's identity.
It's a war of choice for Russia, and existential fight for Ukraine. Once it is done, even if Russia keeps its acquired gains simply for lack of ability of Ukraine to force them out, it will struggle to target anyone else for quite a while, it simply doesn't have the industrial capacity.
@@JohnSmith-gd2fg problem is russia can easily change itself to produce the hardware it needs. Russia supplies the world with the raw Materials needed to produce. Ask it needs is reorganize to go from raw metals to actual equipment
Putler has lost, and badly.
Your face.
I hope you Europeans have learned that you need to fight evil early, and in someone else’s country. Pay now or pay later
Considering what's happening that's a serious overstatement
I agree. As much as I want to see putins Russia lose. They're still clawing ground, be that at a small scale. Personally the west should be doing twice as much. 4 HIMARS in one package simply isnt enough.
It's nonsense.
"We are now four months into our glorious 14 day special operation, everything goes according to plan"...V Putin.
"It's going so well we decided to extend it!"
@@karabenomar Yep in your dreams 💤 Russia is a paper bear in decline. An aging population. I doubt there will even be a Country called Russia soon. A gas station with Soviet era Nukes. All this through a Soviet obsessed ego maniac 👍🏻
@@karabenomar 😆
@@karabenomar 😂😂😂
@@karabenomar extend the pain of the Ukrainians right...🤣😂🤣🤣😂
Russias gain in Ukraine last month since the end of May was 0.3% extra of Ukraine. Even though it is a heavy toll they're still gaining land. NATO must do more.
True Russia is gaining!! NATO is just sending toys and moral support from the Media
@duncan smith if demilitarization of Ukraine was really Pootin’s goal, then they have failed miserably! UAF are now 3-4x more numerous than they were in February!
@duncan smith not sure of the casualty toll to be honest, I know Ukraine are saying about 140K Russian casualties so far (makes sense as for every death there are 3 injured, so if theres 35k killed theres 105k injured). But with the fact that RU are throwing 40-50K artillery shells a day down range compared to UKR 5-6K shells. It doesnt look good. places like Germany need to show more commitment.
@@st-ex8506 Russian soldiers casualty vs Ukraine territory!! 🤔
@@matthewredman7814 I wonder it too.. maybe Ukrainian is undead or robots
You have to remember what will happen when the weather starts to get colder and wetter. When the military of Russia is sitting in the nice four and five mile convoy and out of fuel, how many troops and tanks are going to be ripped apart
😂... you sound like a child with a gang of imaginary friends
Eh bro it isn't March anymore. Russia made it past those mistakes. They have adapted.
When weather get colder Russia will have all goals complete already. Then they will be in defense mode a wait for Ukrainian tanks stuck in mud. Also EU will start to cry for gas and will forget to supply UA with weapons. Picture is so clear you just need to open your eyes.
@@zorancupac7145 This comment has not aged well.
@Michael Gratton It's obvious now that Russia fights against Nato, not against Ukraine. It will take longer to finish all goals,but once liberates Bakhmut, most of the goals will be complete :)
Russian military is making slow small gains in a certain area. But suffering huge loses as they go
Very interesting opinions, thank you Times Radio, we've had some fantastic guests on over the last few months, well done TR!!
you forget that now ukraine candidate join the eu and to become a full member the country must be conflict free this means that the russians must be driven back to the historical borders of the country.
this also means that the full eu will continue to support ukraine until this is achieved is a member of the eu and to become a full member the country must be conflict free, meaning that the russians must be pushed back to the country's historic borders.
this also means that the full eu will continue to support ukraine until this is achieved
Although Ukraine joining the EU would not be simple but... doesn't the "conflict free" clause only apply to joining NATO?
WELL RIGHT NOW THE OPPOSITE IS HAPPENING
Russia just took another town
@@boymande So another destroyed town it will have to spend Billions to rebuild, the infrastructure and Industry they are destroying they will never be able to afford to rebuild
@@wladmuir yep, it only applies to NATO. Cyprus is still in conflict with Turkey, yet it is a member of the EU.
@@thundereagle4130 wrong cypress is in a dormant conflict that is quite different from an armed conflict or war it is a very complicated story but a country must not have had any armed conflicts in the year before accession have no claim to territory from other countries and acquired territory by annexation must be returned to the belonging country two years before accession. this does not apply to land that has belonged to the land for more than two hundred years.
this is one of the reasons why turkey is not allowed to join the eu
His 'legacy' could have been totally different if he had worked at beneficial policies instead of foolish conquest.
That's precisely what Merkel was trying to do. Unfortunately, she failed.
Putin did work for a beneficial policy, beneficial to Russia... unlike the western leaders who only work to keep their people down.
The issue here is oil and gas. The timing is unfortunate but necessary in his mind.
The wounds of the ussr were still quite raw when oil and gas were discovered in ukraine, therefore the ukrainians would likely let anyone but russia exploit it. Indeed, the americans started to extract oil and gas in ukraine.
This situation was not good for russia who invade the donbas to get it instead as they likely wanted no competition.
“Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.” - Napoleon
Napoleon? Lol
Ukrain is loosing, civilians dying, citizens displaced and there infrastructures damaged. All NATO is doing is prolonging the war to see if we can weaking Russian. We are not helping the Ukrainian people instead we are using them to fight our battle.
Uh, Hello? Ukraine wants to fight and ask for weapons? Handing them weapons is helping?
There is no amount of weapons the west can provide that could allow Ukraine to win this conflict by military means. Zero chance. Thus, more military aid only prolongs and extends the suffering of the Ukrainian people. Reaching for peace ASAP is the only sensible way to go. unfortunately, peace doesn’t make the military industrial complex richer
@@rauld.rodriguez2399 Of course there is. What nonsense.
As a member of NATO that doesn't have a common border with Russia, the UK has admirably given Ukraine plenty of weapons but only in relation to other NATO members. The UK should feel free to give Ukraine more since it's prefereable that those weapons by used on a Ukrainian battlefiedl than on a UK battlefield. Weapons to Ukraine are not wasted or in any way some kind of lesser use than in the hands of a UK soldier. And, other countries should give Ukraine based on same prindpicles... That it's far better for the Russians to be fouight on Ukraine's soil than on any members's soil.
I think that;s the idea, UK just dosen't have very much to give due to cutbacks year on year. Our armed forces , in terms of numbers, are a joke.
How many of your 300 tanks and 200 fast jet do you think you should give away? BEtter check the numbers befor you start giving all your stuff away. western europe has been playing parasite off of US defense in the past couple decades. None of you have any serious weapons to give. You already do not have enough.
For Russia to be bringing munitions back from its neighbors to resupply the front indicates a problem for them, one bridge stands between success or failure in the south east
A very coherent commentator!
Ukraine is getting stronger as Russia empties its prisons to replace Russian losses , not a sign of a strong military
Time to forget about tricks for clicks. Time to choose, democracy or tyranny.
What I found interesting was that the interviewed expert said, it would take Russia many years to build back their military power after the current losses in the Ukraine.
Looking at history (and speaking from a perspective of a German) we were able to build back our military power completely and even surpass WW1 level within 20 years even though we were under very heavy sanctions, forced payments as dictated by the treaty of Versailles - not to mention the world economic crises of the 1920s.
The above mentioned economic situation was to such an extent that many thousands died of hunger in the inter war years.
This brings me to the conclusion that Russia possibly does not need all that much time to rebuild its military power, even if they are under sanctions (?...)
Several good points.
You are possible right in numbers, however sanctions on electronics, might ensure that they they are not able to stay abreast with modern weaponry.
Making dumb inaccurate artillery etc vastly different than modern weapons albeit you're right Russia could easily replenish it's stocks, as it's mostly WWII era.
This so called 'expert' hasn't got a clue.
No.1 Russia has only dedicated 15% of their total military inventory for the military operation in Ukraine.
No.2 Russia has NOT declared war on Ukraine or fully mobilised for war.
No.3 Russia was ask by leaders of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions for help to stop Ukrainian shelling of civilian areas. Ukraine was also increasing troop numbers for a full invasion of the Donbass before Russia started building up troops on Ukraine's border.
No.4 Ukraine has been committing ethnic cleansing in the Donbass for the last 8 years killing over 10,000 Donbass civilians which is FULLY supported by the West as is the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in Israel.
No.5 Majority of Russian military equipment used was older post-soviet equipment like the T-72 tanks and older. Russia only just sent one of the first T-90's to Ukraine the other week and ZERO T-14 Armata's have been sent for example.
No.6 Russia has used more cruise missiles in 4 months than what the USA can manufacture in a whole year. FACT: Russia can maintain this level of ammunition and cruise missile production indefinitely.
No.7 Western manufacturing for ammo and missiles can NOT keep pace with Russia's large manufacturing base.
Refer to the Duran and The new Atlas for far more accurate analysis rather than a Muppet regurgitating Western propaganda like a dumb parrot.
No.8 Ukraine's military is being grind down and crushed, over 11,000 Ukrainian military units now destroyed which is over half their inventory. The West is being defeated economically (mainly due to their own reckless reactionary incompetent measures, which has only exacerbated Western economic woes) to the point the liberal world order is now in question.
@@nathansmith622 Putzin backed up his hinder parts to your waiting upturned mouth and filled you full of confidence. It reeks.
The “cost” is not exactly the cost. Most times that billion isn’t going into things like hospitals. It’s being wasted on fancy military experiments that won’t be used or to send to tanks to Egypt that they’ll never use let alone unpack.
What blows me away is the west is running out of munitions supporting a regional conflict. What happens when there is a wider conflict? The weapons have gotten so sophisticated they take months/years to replace. The P-51 mustang went from a sketch to a working prototype in less than 90 days. The F-35 required over 10 years to develop. If there ever was a "hot war" I think these weapon systems lifespans would be measured in weeks. After that we are back to the P-51 Mustang
During a hot war the economy of every NATO country will switch to a war economy. Which basically means a lot of people will either be drafted as a soldier or be send to ammo factories. Also every workshop that has any capacity to make bullets, bombs or engines will basically be confiscated by the government. So yeah a lot of bad stuff people will only accept when they are directly in danger of being bombed/occupied.
@@thundereagle4130 With today's tech they won't be able to manufacture the systems fast enough to replace what's been destroyed in the field. Warfare will quickly be reduced to rifles and bullets. Training personal alone to use all this stuff takes years. God save us if they build robot armies, humanity will cease to exist
It might be a good idea that the US has unbelievably large numbers of 'obsolete' ships, armor and planes mothballed. They could come in handy.
You mean nations that sold all their stuff and stopped building are running out. All of a sudden that Trump guy knew what he was talking about when he was going around saying western europe were parasites off of US defense and NATO was a waste for us. Another CHarity case for US taxpayers who are 30 trillion in debt and now beginning to starve. Now it's time to pay the piper and western europE's cupbords are bare and dusty. 200 tanks and 200 fast jets each just doesn't cut it. When Germany France and England combined don't have even 50% of the number of tanks and jets as the former united states, I smell us getting F- ed as usual.
@@MikeBrown-go1pc exactly!
Great talk and 100% on point
One of smartest comments and to the point
Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦🇺🇸🇪🇺
I don't know what the price of defeating Putin is but the price of not defeating is unaffordable.
Trying to cover up Ukraine losses?
Why do these videos loop the same thing twice, exactly? It felt like I was going crazy on one video, now after hearing it in another one I'm questioning your own sanity
Killing innocent peoples is never forgiven ever, there will be a price to pay. Ukraine is fighting a one sided war, defensive, whilst russia is fighting a offensive war and bullying and killing people, genocide.
Ripping the gut out of russia ? Ukraine has made russia pay .. Ukraine brave people that need a salute . They should be proud . 🇬🇧 🇺🇦....
How much did the Russians pay ? They now have more land . Ukraine should be proud of defeat and loss of their nation ? Most Ukrainains will not come back to Ukraime ? I wish you where in thier shoes so that you can be proud. I believe you are from UK. Pray that is happem to your country so that you can be proud
@@celestineoc1123 I am proud . Millions of Ukraines have left there home in fear , that speaks for its self . And to fight against a country the don't want war ,then forced into war . That like kicking a man whist he's down . Would Russia have done this if Ukraine had nukes .
At the NATO meeting last week total support for Ukraine was pledged. It wont weaken.
You Bet? Hahahahahahaha
@@knutkatastrophe2722 There are significant signs that the Russian forces are weakening. The Ukraine will be a major problem for Russia now for decades to come. They will be chipping away at Russia for years, backed financially and militarily by the west. Russia has made it's bed and now must lie on it. It's just a shame that Putin will take the people of Russia down with him.
The analyst is wrong. He is focusing too much on Putin. But Putin exist within a cultural context, the one you can easily see on the State Media and the bellicose diatribes of those who speak there. This means that if Russia (the country, not its president) gets away with territorial gains in Ukraine (beyond the ones they already got before 2022) even after the whole West parade of sanctions and loud charade of support (many that didn’t materialize on due time) then the famous NATO deterrence is left lest terrible, lest fearsome.
Russia is already making deals with China and India (and others) to have them as main consumers of their fossil fuels and those are huge countries that are growing, what means that they can easily replace Europe’s consumption. Plus those other countries aren’t that friendly with the West.
20 years for a single individual is a long time, for a nation is merely another step for the next war if there is not a clear defeat or a change on the sociopolitical building of a country: that’s what happened with Germany after WWI: it simply prepared for the second world war, even after losing, due to internal struggles (plus the indecisiveness of Europe due to the advance of communism in Russia as they thought as strong Germany could deter it). Some people think that Russia should be strong to deter China on the Far East.
The West got addicted to the prosperity that came after the fall of Soviet Union as there was no longer the Cold War and they thought they could divert military expenses on more useful social spending than to prevent a collapsed enemy to get up again, as they thought that it was about communism alone: it wasn’t. It was a geostrategic stance that superseded communism. And Russia would reclaim what it sees as its natural place in Europe and the world.
Reclaim you can. Good luck with that.
Weigh the price of defeat against the price of winning and you have the price of waging the war. OBVIOUSLY !
its going to be like afganistan for little pooty he will never win it will be blood shed forever god bless ukraine
One big consideration is the vast amount of military knowledge that has been gained from this war. First, the concept of separate treatment of non combatants has been completely discarded by eastern governments and military leaders. Entire cities of millions have been mercilessly razed to secure advantage. We saw it first in Syria, now on our own doorstep. Second, in spite of the apparent ubiquity of modern communication systems, the power of propaganda can still guide and energise the vast majority of public opinion and backing in the aggressor nation. Third, the concept of mechanised Blitzkrieg, unless much more carefully planned and executed is no longer valid in Europe, especially when opposed with smart precision munitions and unmanned air support. Fourth, artillery, the technology that revolutionised warfare hundreds, even thousands of years ago, is still a powerful tool, especially if you no longer care about avoiding civilian casualties, as now seems to be the case where Russia is concerned. Fifth, a motivated, professional and well equipped national army can withstand a conventional invasion surprisingly well, even against seemingly overwhelming power. NATO will need to take all of these learnings into consideration when planning for future hardware and training. It has already saved trillions in avoiding purchases that have been shown up as little more than a dictator’s toy chest. So let’s take this opportunity to thank the Ukrainians now for these future savings. Give them what they need to achieve the kind of military success that will also make possible a Western political victory (I.e. restoration of a real, sustainable democracy in Russia)
Rapid mobile warfare is always valid, and always will be. When properly executed, men on foot with hand-held weapons have no ability to stop it. You do need control of the air though, or at least rough parity, to make deep tank strikes work...........a real army could upend Russia's artillery-heavy, slowly-grinding-forward approach pretty quickly through a deep drive behind enemy lines, surrounding the artillery and men near the front.
The lesson I'm getting is that mass artillery bombardments are ineffective in comparison to smaller numbers of artillery carrying out precision strikes. What is the point of wasting ammunition to carpet an area when a few shells or rockets can take out selected targets. The Ukrainians are able to take out strategic targets at long range now. With sufficient numbers of precision weapons they could systematically destroy Russian artillery and command centres while relatively safe from return fire.
@@nerdyali4154 Alistair, I think (hope) that you will be proved correct when and if the promised systems are deployed in sufficient volume, if it is not too late. But to me it seems we haven’t really seen the full effect of this phase of the war yet, apparently down to either lack of training or foot dragging by western governments or probably some of each. And again, the results from introduction of this capability will be keenly observed by NATO strategists who will then be better able to tailor their hardware purchasing programs to better economic effect. But it will still be Ukrainian blood that will continue to be shed. My point is that the West should double down on the supply of these weapons, not only because it is the morally correct action, but also, selfishly, to see how well they work in a real, large scale life and death scenario.
@@nerdyali4154 Ukraine is losing badly. Western media is simply out of touch with reality. The resistance has collapsed. UA backbone is broken by Russians. In fact as a nato commander, I would be very worried looking at overwhelming superiority of Russian artillery.
@@realnapster1522 western media is generally not saying Ukraine is winning. They do like to emphasize ukranian wins (snake island). This war is not indicative of how nato would fight Russia. Actually, after seeing how poorly the Russian Air Force has performed I suspect nato air forces are even more confident in their air superiority tactics. If Ukraine had nato caliber Air Force, they’d quickly crush the artillery advantage of Russia. Heck Russia has already had to pull back its navy because western arms, and the himars are causing Russia to push back its command centers. This is nothing but a proxy war and nato is capturing immense intelligence on the poor state of Russian army, equipment and tactics….without losing a single nato soldier
Russia, Thank Putin for your situation.
With only 120K soldiers and against 400K NATO trained Ukrainians, Russians have done pretty well. Ukraine has been winning this war since day 1 but only in the news.
I think it's 180 to 200k Russian soldiers vs 250k professional UA soldiers and over 300k (not sure about last number) territorial defense. Your comment is the first sensible one I saw in this section and I had to scroll for a while. 100% true, Ukraine is winning just in the media. People should check non western sources before making those silly comments
Good points here👍
Great interview, logical and common sense
Wow, this is some spin.
The spin here is incredible!🤦🏿♂️
I dont think torn Russia's guts out more like broke Russia's nose, removed some teeth, a broken some ribs but hey the Russian ogre is still fighting .
Not even that. Just scuffed their overcoat
Yes, Ukraine proved Russia is grossly weak. 20 years of modernization and in a few months Ukraine have shown they are weak.
Do you really need to replay the same piece ?
But Russia is only weeks away from getting the whole of the Donbas and the land bridge. This can be called a victory and it looks very unlikely that Ukraine will be able to get any territory back. I also dispute that Putin ever intended to invade the whole of the Ukraine. I would suggest that you do a search for John Mearsheimer for much more detail.
All of Europe should have declared a state of emergency in response to Russia's invasion. That was the minimum step needed to get the general public to understand the seriousness of the situation. Instead, our governments all like to pretend that we can continue as normal, in political and economic terms, while at the same time engaging in military support for Ukraine and economic warfare against Russia. We have huge costs to face for both the support and the sanctions, and by not having a state of emergency we leave our politics wide open to a popular backlash against the costs incurred. That is something Putin and his supporters will exploit mercilessly, driving as much unrest as possible across Europe to reduce or even negate the support for Ukraine.
Ukraine might seem like a country far, far away. But so was Czechoslovakia 1938.
"The Russian Army will be out of men and ammo in 10 days." - Every Western military analyst, 4 months ago.
Name one.
No one said that
"Our military operation will be over in 14 days" - Putin, 4 months ago.
@@idleishde6124 "It's just a military exercise, the west is being hysterical"
Putin and Lavrov, mid february
The cost ?
I have my Family safe - food in the cupboards - a roof over my head. Yes cost of living is up and there's nothing much left BUT I support and admire ukrain plus my countries support
Good interview.
Ukraine can take back Crimea by having 50 harpoon/tridents locked and loaded to keep the Russian navy far from the coast
YOU SANK MY BATTLESHIP
Putin will take that as a declaration of war and use it to justify full mobilisation.
They would need to take out the Kerch Strait bridge as well, and then get control with boots on the ground.
Rather easier said than done.
Is this a joke? Ukraine has absolutely ZERO say so in their fate at this point. Russia fought this battle on its own terms. The cost has been perfectly acceptable to them. Their intention was to destroy the Ukraine military and it has done that handily.
The intent was to take the capital in 3 days, Gregory.
@@mattdonna9677 Lol. Says who? Russia has NEVER conducted any military operation like that. Keep reaching for face saving victories. The fact is NATO tried to bully a country that had a lot stiffer left hook than any of them dreamed.
There's not really an alternative to support Ukraine to the bitter end. Russia will only become more dangerous and aggressive if not given appropriate opposition. Really the western powers should not have pledged not to support Ukraine with troops.
This guy is spot on
How is your population not being willing or able to tolerate years of inflation and economic disruption “attention deficit disorder”?