YF-22 Vs. YF-23 1986 - 1991

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 фев 2018
  • Description
  • КиноКино

Комментарии • 19

  • @Pilkie101
    @Pilkie101 11 месяцев назад +1

    Smart Clint Eastwood type badass pilot talking about the plane. Pity it was rejected. It was a fabulous plane.

  • @Dakers11
    @Dakers11 4 года назад +15

    The main reason expressed by Congress was ,the YF-22 cost less per Unit than the YF-23. That the YF-22 was slightly more manueverable at certain, but not all attack angles. That turned out to be , not true since the commissioned F-22 had several cost overuns. The F-22 Originally priced at 137$ million per plane. Is now 377$ miilion per unit. Sometimes, depending on the plane estimates run high as 678$ million per Unit. The canopy wears out sooner than expected. The terxture coatings of the F-22 wear out sooner than projected or expected. But it's still better than the PAK-Fa 50 by the Rusiians . Who are 20 years behind , if you do the math when the planes were rolled out and tested. The projection lifespan of the F-22 was/is 40 years.

    • @keithpennock
      @keithpennock 3 года назад +2

      Dakers11 I heard the primary reason Northrop lost was because of their massive cost overruns on the B-2. In light of the cost overruns on the F-22, I wonder if that incentive system (and desire to punish) will be in place when they evaluate 6th Gen fighters. Although it does not help the per unit cost when the military keeps cutting total numbers because the development costs are sunk and now have to be distributed over fewer aircraft so that drives up the per unit cost. The Air Force could seriously stand to have had more F-22s right now. We are seriously short of tactical units and the F-15 airframes are aging out (so are the F-16) and those are both based on 1970s design technology.

    • @MITWILLN
      @MITWILLN Месяц назад

      Wrong, the F-22’s unit cost is not $377 million, it was around 150 million, as per reported unit costs of the last raptors manufactured

  • @raymondyee2008
    @raymondyee2008 2 года назад +5

    I tested the YF-23 in “SFMC” and she could have been a game changer for the USAF.

    • @draygoes
      @draygoes Год назад

      What is SMFC?

    • @ruskiwaffle1991
      @ruskiwaffle1991 10 месяцев назад

      @@draygoes strike fighters modern combat, some mobile game

  • @stephenszabo2361
    @stephenszabo2361 2 года назад +1

    I don't buy that landing gear gearwas down as the chase planes have to use afterburner to keep up...because you over speed the gear near 300 knts.

  • @johnnyblaze9808
    @johnnyblaze9808 5 лет назад +2

    Sounds good to me

  • @danielcampbell6564
    @danielcampbell6564 4 года назад +1

    WF-23 , put a ramjet in it.

  • @knightlife98
    @knightlife98 4 года назад

    Hard to believe that this took place in the late 80's and early 90's...!? I'd love to see where they are actually at, when it comes down to what they can put in the air today.....

    • @worm3165
      @worm3165 3 года назад +2

      One's at the national museum of the usaf and the other onr is in some small airport museum in soithern california.

    • @knightlife98
      @knightlife98 3 года назад +1

      @@worm3165 Thanks, Worm!

    • @worm3165
      @worm3165 3 года назад +1

      @@knightlife98 So the exact name of california museum is called the western museum of flight in torrence, Ca. Its just sitting outside, exposed to the elements :(

    • @knightlife98
      @knightlife98 3 года назад

      @@worm3165 Seriously....!? Wtf!!!

    • @worm3165
      @worm3165 3 года назад +1

      @@knightlife98 There's images of it on google

  • @tinto278
    @tinto278 5 месяцев назад

    2:57 what?

  • @phouvanvihaphat5679
    @phouvanvihaphat5679 3 года назад

    Soy Phouvan Vihaphat astrong viles el original no Henry astrong