Would the survivors, or their descendants, really envy the dead? I suppose they might if they happened to have been citizens of any of the nations that were targeted directly within the nuclear holocaust. Otherwise (such as if they were not directly targeted by nuclear attack), I believe the survivors, and their descendants, might pity the dead (perhaps for their foolishness) instead of envying them.
Considerably, if every nuke was to go off in it's place of storage there would be a whole different end than if they went off on the surface, the dust cloud would be far weaker, as a large portion of the nukes are underwater, as would the rad storms, however ocean life would be far more destroyed.
The country that would be worse off would be russia due to their mobile nuclear deterrence Though every nuclear equipped submarine would be devastating
@@rodturner6759 how exactly would the oceans be devastated? Water is an incredibly good radiation shield and the ocean is massive compared to land on the surface.
This is actually an old hypothesis. Scientists have recently said that an all-out nuclear war wouldn't end mankind. Maybe I am wrong, and the study was more based on active nukes.
The video was a hypothetical about all nukes in existence going of. Meaning ALL of them, those in reserve that wouldnt go off in an initial nuclear face off as well. You are right in that a nuclear face off wouldnt end the world completely, However the vast majority of the world population is still going to die. As well as serious climate effects and horrible mass extinctions. Though all the hardiest stuff will make it. Bears for example will probably take a heavy drop but might make it through, just barely. Most of us are going to die. We can cross our fingers and hope we are that %2 that makes it through to the other side of winter but those are some desperate odds.
@@Cipher_Paul there has been talks recently whether nuclear winter would actually occur. I'd imagine it would be far worse if we had this type of scenario happen in the mid 80s when the total stockpile was close to 80k...
Mankind - nope. Civilization - yep. I really don't wanna see the day AFTER every single nuke went off. That's because that event will throw mankind back to the stone ages. Besides that? Even if we glass our planet three times over, Earth still will be the one and only life supporting planet in this system. Good luck finding another one BEFORE the nuclear event as there's no true AFTER once it's over ...
It depends on where the bombs explode. If they exploded all in the same place, than the disaster could be not so destructive (humanity will still have a bad time, but some survivors can resist). But that clearly is not what will happen in a nuclear war. If the bombs will explode in the right place, than just 100 will be really enough to cause small nuclear winter and make a large portion of the planet inabitable. But if all the bombs, nuclear and hidrogen, that we have built will detonate in different part of the world, than the result will be the same of the one caused by the asteroid that wiped out dinosaurs 66 million years ago. That will be humanity extinction event. The reason bevause scientists believe that a nuclear war wouldn't end humanity is because... simply no one should have to explode so much bombs. To destroy an entire country you need far less than 100 bombs. In conclusion, the war will be win by the one that strike first, with no need to make all the nuclear arsenal of the humanity to explode
Doomsday shelters are a dangerous thing to depend on. Let’s say, you reach your shelter twelve hours after the (totally unexpected) nuclear attack. You have been exposed to radiation, but you are not injured. And this is a very positive scenario. Will the people in the shelter let you in? First you are a problem because of the radiation on you. Second in a total nuclear war everyone knows, that food and water will be a problem in the years to come and that food lasts longer, the less you will have to share. And now let’s say, you reach the bunker within two weeks as no car works after the multiple EM-Impulses. You have been exposed to a lot of radiation on your way to the location of the bunker and you had been forced to eat and drink conterminated food and water. Again - will the inhabitants that have made it earlier let you in? Especially when a group of regular people is following you in hope of rescue. I am not sure, if I would depend on such things. And finally - pure hope is not a strategy.
You start the comment saying you have your own shelter then ask would someone let you in. If you have your own, why are you trying to get into someone else's? You say they are dangerous thing to depend on but everyone already in shelter is ok as long as they don't let anyone with radiation in. Shelters are find when used correctly just like anything else.
I feel like infographics is basically every kid who grew up in the late cold war America and wanted to turn lunch period convos into cartoon explainables.
if you wanna see an accurate portrayal of nuclear fallout, watch an old tv movie from the 80s; The Day After. Very realistic, but don't watch it if you're not prepared to be depressed for the rest of the day.
There would be some big holes in the ground, and some tidal waves from submarines. Most mobile launchers are a long way from civilization, the same with bombers. There would be some fallout, and it would be really rough on sea life, but we could bounce back. If everything launched however, pretty much game over.
@@TML0677 Not necessarily. If for example the US and Russia would start to bomb eachother, or India and Pakistan, then after a few bombs the damage would already be so much they might not even be able to launch the rest of their stock, or they can even change their mind in the process seeing all the destruction...
A hydrogen bomb is not automatically thousands of times stronger than a conventional nuclear weapon, larger bombs are just built as hydrogen bombs because they are more efficient.
I’m a bit freaked out how well I understood the fission vs fusion bombs… Infographics…you know how to explain extremely complex topics in a way that a peeb like me can understand…. Bravo!
Know what's odd? Kurzgesagt, a channel that fully cites its sources and mathematics... showed that a maximum of 6b people (likely) would die. Even including the nuclear winter. *_Yes_* this was an episode about detonating all nuclear weapons on Earth. Weird, that.
I once read somewhere that Robert Oppenheimer in later life regretted his involvement in the Manhatten project, and campaigned against the hydrogen bomb
if you think the equator would be frozen after just 5 years you are *way* underestimating water's ability to retain heat. The sub-arctic oceans wouldn't freeze nearly that quickly. Especially not very deep. It would be cold, though.
@@ashtonrickard2075 that would also take decades at *least*.. And what in this scenario would be causing the poles to completely melt? Even if the air temperature rose to 100 Fahrenheit at the poles, it would take years for all the ice to melt, and this scenario wouldn't significantly heat the planet for more than a few weeks before the nuclear winter sets in.
@@TheScrubExpress I think they meant if you Nuked the Poles with all the nukes in the world. but it would vaporize a ton of it ... so not sure it would end anything lol
Thank you so much for this interesting video. This video reminds me of the terminator movies when Skynet decides to launch nuclear attacks throughout the planet. Let's hope that such a situation would never happen in our lifetime.
Most nuclear weapons are deployed far away from urban areas. Our major cities would mostly be spared. The radiation debris would be contained over smaller areas than if they were launched
Next they’ve gotta explore alien life that could be alive deep below a planets oceans, as they said in this one it’s pretty much a completely isolated and different ecosystem where the energy comes originally from the heat of the core of the planet instead of a sun
@@trinbaker993 True. My friend is in the army and is in Poland right now. He says we are in no danger at this time but if it happens then "that's all folks"
Leaders need to watch this Chanel and realize we don’t need this many nukes on the planet if anything we should point them or send them into space and watch for meteors that are heading toward earth. I want to live a long life then come right back.
@@MetalTrabant Given enough time, the ecosystem would recover and rebalance. Probably with a whole new balance of flora and fauna. I imagine that almost all big mammals would go extinct, same with birds, etc. But insects? Tardigrades? Cockroaches? Most microorganism? Most deep-sea creatures? Many hardy and adaptable simpler plant life? They'll survive, adapt, and mutate. Our post-nuclear-apocalypse ecosystem in 1-2 million years, would look VERY strange to us living today. I kinda wish for a glimpse into THAT future...
I love the video, but I think you would easily get millions of views on an extended video on describing fission vs fusion and atomic vs thermonuclear….the info in this video is great, but I want more!
When fallout 3 was still new and it was game of the year I remember seeing an article about it being called the most realistic post apocalyptic simulator
Nuclear winter is not scientifically proven. The concept of nuclear winter was popularized in the early 80's, when the so-called TTAPS model/study was published by Carl Sagan(and others, but he was the famous "rockstar" scientist, so to speak). But, later on, in 1991, when the kuwaiti oil wells was set on fire by Saddam, Carl Sagan and his fellows applied their TTAPS model on the well fires to predict the environmental effects, and they stated that burning oil would cause the same effect as a nuclear winter - the black soot would rise into the stratosphere, remain there for years, the temperatures will drop, crops will fail, weallgonnadie, etcetc. Needless to say, nothing like that happened. The 2 common flaws of these nuclear winter models: they predict that 1. considerable amount of soot will reach stratosphere 2. it will remain there for many years. But none of these predictions are verified. The detonations themselves simply not strong enough to launch up considerable amount of powdery material into the stratosphere - moreover, there's no material at all to be launched up, since the nukes typically detonated high up in the air. The other way soot can reach the stratosphere is by the fires started by the bomb's heatwave. Well, soot from simple fires can not reach the stratosphere, period. They remain in the troposphere and settle down quickly. IF firestorms are formed, they have the capability to lift up soot into the lower layer of stratosphere. These firestorms occur occasionally during the largest wildfires, and can bring considerable amount of soot into the stratosphere, but even if that's the case, the soot remains there for months, not years - and this is not an assumption, this is fact, it was observed, measured during the 2017 Australian bushfires. So, based on the facts, observations, and current scientific knowledge, even the worst case scenario would be most likely a few month, maybe half year long "nuclear autumn", which is nowhere near to a decade long freezing winter.
I'm no scientist or something along the line, but the latter halve of this video screams "fearmongering" to me. This is not the chicxulub meteor that hits us.
It's the storyline a Ray Bradbury novel, where people living on Mars, watch the Earth get destroyed, after the people on Earth war with each other, which was made into a television series in the eighties. It is also the end of the satirical film Doctor Strangelove. Note this scenario is not too different from what happened, sixty six million years ago to the dinosaurs, although that wasn't as bad.
The opposite is now likely, unfortunately. China is building it's nuclear arsenal and they are not part of the nuclear non proliferation treaty so no one knows just how many they have. Officially its 300 but many suspect way more
"had I known that the Germans would not succeed in developing an atomic bomb, I would have done nothing." - Albert Einstein "I do not know how the Third World War will be fought, but I can tell you what they will use in the Fourth - sticks and stones". - Albert Einstein
I think it's nuts that scientists looked at the original fission ones and thought to themselves "Nah, not big enough." after they had levelled a city each.
Could this be the start of Atlantis? I mean the new humans could evolve underwater over billions of years of evolution when the surface is inhospitable
So the vast majority of these warheads are in silos, submarines, or underground storage bunkers. Yeah it'd be a bad time, but nothing like what's depicted.
If I knew where a nuke was going to fall I’d try to be right underneath it when it goes off. Getting instantly vaporized is much better than dying from radiation burns and poisoning.
![Megan Thee Stallion - Roc Steady (feat. Flo Milli) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HozPPyqW0dY/mqdefault.jpg)
What if everybody in the world farted at the same time
That’s actually a good question
The ozone layer would be destroyed instantly🤣🤣
BAD THINGS
The entire world might smell stinky for a few hours
That is even worse than nukes
"The survivors (of a nuclear war) would envy the dead." - Nikita Khrushchev
nah I wanna see the insane destruction first!
He was right.
@@FatRescueSwimmer04 not me
Would the survivors, or their descendants, really envy the dead? I suppose they might if they happened to have been citizens of any of the nations that were targeted directly within the nuclear holocaust.
Otherwise (such as if they were not directly targeted by nuclear attack), I believe the survivors, and their descendants, might pity the dead (perhaps for their foolishness) instead of envying them.
@@ShadowWolfTJC Well yeah of course if you survive and are in relatively good shape, then of course you wouldnt care
Atomic Bomb: *Explodes*
People from every city: "OH NOOOOOOOOO!!!"
People of Detroit: "A regular tuesday like any other..."
Yeah, okay
Is that a jojo reference?
people of chicago: this isn't so bad!
Considerably, if every nuke was to go off in it's place of storage there would be a whole different end than if they went off on the surface, the dust cloud would be far weaker, as a large portion of the nukes are underwater, as would the rad storms, however ocean life would be far more destroyed.
The country that would be worse off would be russia due to their mobile nuclear deterrence
Though every nuclear equipped submarine would be devastating
@E Van I mean nuclear weapons moving around are more dangerous than those in storage
Even if you were correct, life on land is depndant on life in the ocean. So if the oceans die so do we...
@E Van yes the fallout for you but not for everyone else
@@rodturner6759 how exactly would the oceans be devastated? Water is an incredibly good radiation shield and the ocean is massive compared to land on the surface.
Imagine being so strong that your inventions can destroy 99% of life
it's not strength just smarts/stupidity
Thats actually called being too smart for your own good.
DOOMSDAY MACHINES
I’m really loving this theme of exploring the effects of apocalyptic scenarios
Yeas it's so aesthetic
You're one if thoes i want to know how im going out
anytime this can actually be reality
I watch this RUclips channel called What If and it covers a lot of that
In my opinion humans are the only lifeforms on earth that don't learn from past events/ mistakes. Nature always seems to correct it self.
"Write that down, write that down!" - Alien 👽 Invaders
lol
"but, Sir. That'll destroy all the Coca-Cola we came here to buy then resale back home."
It's ID4 but with nukes.
@@nikidesignsolutionsandgami1518 AMERICAN FOUND
This is actually an old hypothesis. Scientists have recently said that an all-out nuclear war wouldn't end mankind. Maybe I am wrong, and the study was more based on active nukes.
Nuclear war wouldn't end humanity, but nuclear winter may do it instead.
The video was a hypothetical about all nukes in existence going of. Meaning ALL of them, those in reserve that wouldnt go off in an initial nuclear face off as well.
You are right in that a nuclear face off wouldnt end the world completely,
However the vast majority of the world population is still going to die. As well as serious climate effects and horrible mass extinctions.
Though all the hardiest stuff will make it.
Bears for example will probably take a heavy drop but might make it through, just barely.
Most of us are going to die. We can cross our fingers and hope we are that %2 that makes it through to the other side of winter but those are some desperate odds.
@@Cipher_Paul there has been talks recently whether nuclear winter would actually occur. I'd imagine it would be far worse if we had this type of scenario happen in the mid 80s when the total stockpile was close to 80k...
Mankind - nope.
Civilization - yep.
I really don't wanna see the day AFTER every single nuke went off. That's because that event will throw mankind back to the stone ages.
Besides that? Even if we glass our planet three times over, Earth still will be the one and only life supporting planet in this system. Good luck finding another one BEFORE the nuclear event as there's no true AFTER once it's over ...
It depends on where the bombs explode. If they exploded all in the same place, than the disaster could be not so destructive (humanity will still have a bad time, but some survivors can resist). But that clearly is not what will happen in a nuclear war. If the bombs will explode in the right place, than just 100 will be really enough to cause small nuclear winter and make a large portion of the planet inabitable. But if all the bombs, nuclear and hidrogen, that we have built will detonate in different part of the world, than the result will be the same of the one caused by the asteroid that wiped out dinosaurs 66 million years ago. That will be humanity extinction event. The reason bevause scientists believe that a nuclear war wouldn't end humanity is because... simply no one should have to explode so much bombs. To destroy an entire country you need far less than 100 bombs. In conclusion, the war will be win by the one that strike first, with no need to make all the nuclear arsenal of the humanity to explode
Doomsday shelters are a dangerous thing to depend on. Let’s say, you reach your shelter twelve hours after the (totally unexpected) nuclear attack. You have been exposed to radiation, but you are not injured. And this is a very positive scenario.
Will the people in the shelter let you in? First you are a problem because of the radiation on you. Second in a total nuclear war everyone knows, that food and water will be a problem in the years to come and that food lasts longer, the less you will have to share.
And now let’s say, you reach the bunker within two weeks as no car works after the multiple EM-Impulses. You have been exposed to a lot of radiation on your way to the location of the bunker and you had been forced to eat and drink conterminated food and water.
Again - will the inhabitants that have made it earlier let you in? Especially when a group of regular people is following you in hope of rescue.
I am not sure, if I would depend on such things. And finally - pure hope is not a strategy.
You start the comment saying you have your own shelter then ask would someone let you in. If you have your own, why are you trying to get into someone else's? You say they are dangerous thing to depend on but everyone already in shelter is ok as long as they don't let anyone with radiation in.
Shelters are find when used correctly just like anything else.
old cars without chips Would still start
@@richierich1835 spark plugs won’t work
@@richierich1835 Diesel engines would survive the EMP. Also up date the vacuum tube.
it definitely would make a difference weather they were launched or just blew up at the storage and missile silos
He said it wouldn't matter in the long run, not that there is no difference
Yeah both Nagasaki and Hiroshima had air detonation, both are thriving
Oppenheimer’s Nightmare
I feel like infographics is basically every kid who grew up in the late cold war America and wanted to turn lunch period convos into cartoon explainables.
@@maxwellkukowski8818 facts bro
@@maxwellkukowski8818 tru but I'm talking like real 80s style Nintendo cold war
Keep up the amazing work mr. Narrator!!
if you wanna see an accurate portrayal of nuclear fallout, watch an old tv movie from the 80s; The Day After. Very realistic, but don't watch it if you're not prepared to be depressed for the rest of the day.
There would be some big holes in the ground, and some tidal waves from submarines. Most mobile launchers are a long way from civilization, the same with bombers. There would be some fallout, and it would be really rough on sea life, but we could bounce back. If everything launched however, pretty much game over.
Its everything or nothing
@@TML0677 Not necessarily. If for example the US and Russia would start to bomb eachother, or India and Pakistan, then after a few bombs the damage would already be so much they might not even be able to launch the rest of their stock, or they can even change their mind in the process seeing all the destruction...
@@TML0677 which is a sure fire means of destroying life.
A hydrogen bomb is not automatically thousands of times stronger than a conventional nuclear weapon, larger bombs are just built as hydrogen bombs because they are more efficient.
I’m a bit freaked out how well I understood the fission vs fusion bombs… Infographics…you know how to explain extremely complex topics in a way that a peeb like me can understand…. Bravo!
I learned more from this channel than school 🎒 itself 😂
Why freaked out? You should be proud
Know what's odd? Kurzgesagt, a channel that fully cites its sources and mathematics... showed that a maximum of 6b people (likely) would die. Even including the nuclear winter. *_Yes_* this was an episode about detonating all nuclear weapons on Earth. Weird, that.
Sponsored now. They all changing their content 😢
Narrator: "The U.S. and Russia have custody of 90% of all the nukes in the World."
Me: [Shambles in sheer terror.]
We are doomed
@@duanebry im american and trust me must people in our country dont support it. but theres nothing that we can really do about it
@Nikolai we dont support the creation/testing/using nukes. its our government chioce, not ours
@Nikolai same goes for russia, only reason the US hasn’t taken it
@@duanebry pretty much yeah
I once read somewhere that Robert Oppenheimer in later life regretted his involvement in the Manhatten project, and campaigned against the hydrogen bomb
if you think the equator would be frozen after just 5 years you are *way* underestimating water's ability to retain heat. The sub-arctic oceans wouldn't freeze nearly that quickly. Especially not very deep. It would be cold, though.
But if the poles melted, it would stop the currents transporting warm and cool water, and THAT would cause the planet to cool.
@@ashtonrickard2075 that would also take decades at *least*.. And what in this scenario would be causing the poles to completely melt? Even if the air temperature rose to 100 Fahrenheit at the poles, it would take years for all the ice to melt, and this scenario wouldn't significantly heat the planet for more than a few weeks before the nuclear winter sets in.
@@TheScrubExpress I think they meant if you Nuked the Poles with all the nukes in the world. but it would vaporize a ton of it ... so not sure it would end anything lol
@@ashtonrickard2075 no just in the north and south no warm water.
"Patrolling the Mojave almost makes you wish for a nuclear winter.."
When do we get part 2 of the survivor's story? We want more!
That was a good one.
no such story
@@TML0677 Did you ever hear the tragedy of "no such story."?
Thank you so much for this interesting video. This video reminds me of the terminator movies when Skynet decides to launch nuclear attacks throughout the planet. Let's hope that such a situation would never happen in our lifetime.
Humanity wipes itself out by 13,000 nukes
*Intelligent cockroaches evolve*
yeah so whats intresting is cockroaches could be sitting next to a smaller nuke when it went off and survive. thats how resilent cockroaches are.
I love this channel. I'm constantly looking for the new uploads now
Most nuclear weapons are deployed far away from urban areas. Our major cities would mostly be spared. The radiation debris would be contained over smaller areas than if they were launched
"In nuclear war, all men are cremated equal." - Dexter Gordon
they stop talking about how a bomb works at 5:00 for the ones that just wanna see what happens
Fallout and Terminator told us a different story about the nukes
The bad thing is this can happen at any moment
Not really, but I keep hoping it happens ASAP. We need to equalize things.
"You cannot out run it!"
Meanwhile... Florida Man: "Ka-Chow!"
Next they’ve gotta explore alien life that could be alive deep below a planets oceans, as they said in this one it’s pretty much a completely isolated and different ecosystem where the energy comes originally from the heat of the core of the planet instead of a sun
Nobody
Kim jong-un: write that down
These are the videos that give this world so much hope 🙌
Better to be informed than not.
Infographics post
I settled in for another unbelievable story experience 😊
When it happens do all the radios start playing “here comes the sun *dodododo*”
It would be the end of the world if this happened. Scary to even think about it.
Scary to think that this might happen
@@trinbaker993 True. My friend is in the army and is in Poland right now. He says we are in no danger at this time but if it happens then "that's all folks"
no such thing as the end of the world.. just the end of humanity. That actually might be a good thing
@@RSVPrr true that.
Happened before and will happen again.
Leaders need to watch this Chanel and realize we don’t need this many nukes on the planet if anything we should point them or send them into space and watch for meteors that are heading toward earth. I want to live a long life then come right back.
Now THIS! Is a true way to end our foolishness.
Yes! I keep praying for this to occur. The playing field needs to be leveled.
This would be the ultimate foolishness, but sadly it wouldn't just destroy us, but this beautiful planet with all the innocent life on it as well... 😕
@@MetalTrabant Given enough time, the ecosystem would recover and rebalance. Probably with a whole new balance of flora and fauna. I imagine that almost all big mammals would go extinct, same with birds, etc. But insects? Tardigrades? Cockroaches? Most microorganism? Most deep-sea creatures? Many hardy and adaptable simpler plant life? They'll survive, adapt, and mutate.
Our post-nuclear-apocalypse ecosystem in 1-2 million years, would look VERY strange to us living today. I kinda wish for a glimpse into THAT future...
Only for a failed species.
@@ChineduOpara I wholly despize people like you. You refuse to off yourself and want the rest of us to.
I love the video, but I think you would easily get millions of views on an extended video on describing fission vs fusion and atomic vs thermonuclear….the info in this video is great, but I want more!
Agreed 👍
Love this series of nuclear problems
When fallout 3 was still new and it was game of the year I remember seeing an article about it being called the most realistic post apocalyptic simulator
I love this channel...and "Be Amazed" both are entertaining and pretty accurate, informative and enjoyable to watch.....makes you think, no?
in my opinion, the infographic show is better
If you exploded all the nuclear bombs in the same place at the same time... it would break the Earth's crust! 🌍💣🔥
Nuclear winter is not scientifically proven.
The concept of nuclear winter was popularized in the early 80's, when the so-called TTAPS model/study was published by Carl Sagan(and others, but he was the famous "rockstar" scientist, so to speak).
But, later on, in 1991, when the kuwaiti oil wells was set on fire by Saddam, Carl Sagan and his fellows applied their TTAPS model on the well fires to predict the environmental effects, and they stated that burning oil would cause the same effect as a nuclear winter - the black soot would rise into the stratosphere, remain there for years, the temperatures will drop, crops will fail, weallgonnadie, etcetc.
Needless to say, nothing like that happened.
The 2 common flaws of these nuclear winter models: they predict that 1. considerable amount of soot will reach stratosphere 2. it will remain there for many years.
But none of these predictions are verified.
The detonations themselves simply not strong enough to launch up considerable amount of powdery material into the stratosphere - moreover, there's no material at all to be launched up, since the nukes typically detonated high up in the air.
The other way soot can reach the stratosphere is by the fires started by the bomb's heatwave.
Well, soot from simple fires can not reach the stratosphere, period. They remain in the troposphere and settle down quickly.
IF firestorms are formed, they have the capability to lift up soot into the lower layer of stratosphere. These firestorms occur occasionally during the largest wildfires, and can bring considerable amount of soot into the stratosphere, but even if that's the case, the soot remains there for months, not years - and this is not an assumption, this is fact, it was observed, measured during the 2017 Australian bushfires.
So, based on the facts, observations, and current scientific knowledge, even the worst case scenario would be most likely a few month, maybe half year long "nuclear autumn", which is nowhere near to a decade long freezing winter.
Then we'd all be Playing Fallout IRL
Always look forward to your content.
The uranium gun type bomb has been obsolete since 1945
Still works and destroy a city.
Tsunamis and EQ's: Give us a credit too 🌊
Infographics nuke obsession ia amazing 😂
_....And I love it!_ 🤪
We need these world leaders to get along. This shouldn’t even be a thing.
What if nuclear bombs aren't radioactive & didn't cause a nuclear winter?
We'd be better off.
At that point we really don't have anything to worry about...
All of the worlds nukes: blow up
South America: that sounds like a you problem
I have a video idea!!! How about what would happen minute by minute if you stood right next to the elephants foot in Chernobyl??
I'm no scientist or something along the line, but the latter halve of this video screams "fearmongering" to me.
This is not the chicxulub meteor that hits us.
The people who die in the initial detonations will be the lucky ones
I really pray that this never happens
Queen elizabeth: Pathetic, I SAW THE BIG BANG. Chuck norris: What just happened.
It's the storyline a Ray Bradbury novel, where people living on Mars, watch the Earth get destroyed, after the people on Earth war with each other, which was made into a television series in the eighties.
It is also the end of the satirical film Doctor Strangelove.
Note this scenario is not too different from what happened, sixty six million years ago to the dinosaurs, although that wasn't as bad.
Just no radiation, it removed them so that mammals can take over.
Fallout 4 has prepared me for this.
Same
Wouldn’t the oceans be messed up too if all the nukes in submarines exploded too
The opposite is now likely, unfortunately. China is building it's nuclear arsenal and they are not part of the nuclear non proliferation treaty so no one knows just how many they have. Officially its 300 but many suspect way more
1:48 "This is our city and this is what we do every day, because that's who we are.. "
Cockroaches also go extinct?
Nuclear apocalypse, i misjudged you.
Simple answer: The server will lag so hard that each of us will get kicked.
6:45, Since when is distance measured in square miles? Nice editing
That hypothetical alien scenario really IS poetic.
Hey I got a Infographics show you could do. What it would be like to be living on a planet when two planets collide.
"had I known that the Germans would not succeed in developing an atomic bomb, I would have done nothing." - Albert Einstein
"I do not know how the Third World War will be fought, but I can tell you what they will use in the Fourth - sticks and stones". - Albert Einstein
Yeah the scariest thing comes after the explosion, the looters looking for big screen tv's.
This is extremely scary to think about tbh, Nukes should have never been created
Patrolling the Mojave almost makes you wish for a... OH FU 💀
Pretty sure this was the basic plot of the show The 100. Great show, fun to watch!
If this is what it takes to get rid of 'reality' TV, it's worth it.
Bro just did a Kurzgesagt 💀
we can't build that complex of a bomb but can't figure out homelessness or cancer
0:10 R.I.P Iverson
I think it's nuts that scientists looked at the original fission ones and thought to themselves "Nah, not big enough." after they had levelled a city each.
Hold on, doesn't the radiation from radioactive fallout from nuclear bombs drop to acceptable levels in about 2 weeks??
Infographics getting comfortable with nukes and war
ALL THE fallout 4 players saving they bottle caps for this day
Whenever I think about all nukes or nuclear I always think of Terminator lol.
SkyNet's got this 👍
The details of the workings of both the bombs are (atleast to me) more exhaustive than, I've read anywhere else.
The explanation of a fussion bomb was crazy but imagine trying to get it to work - how long did it really take
Telling a different Story every week ,no death ,all death ,way to tell me that you have no clue either
how realistic is the netflix show the 100
I love that alien analogy lol.
Could this be the start of Atlantis? I mean the new humans could evolve underwater over billions of years of evolution when the surface is inhospitable
This should be made into an actual film.
Well, "Nuclear War Survival Skills" says otherwise.
What if everyone in the world smoked a joint at the same time
My bunker is legit. Can stay in there for a year. I'll be good.
@@santorini8423 no that was me being facetious. Work on your understanding of sarcasm clown
So the vast majority of these warheads are in silos, submarines, or underground storage bunkers. Yeah it'd be a bad time, but nothing like what's depicted.
It's EXACTLY as depicted!
@@TML0677 No.
@@SpencerAK74M You'd shoot at nuclear snow?
@@TML0677 🤣 🤣 🤣
And as Dr. Ian Malcolm.From Jurassic Park says “Life will find a way”.
Wow that would be crazy. Nice vid.
Absolutly disgusting that we could literally end it all at the press of a button.
i love how aliens said "nuke them 😃"
If I knew where a nuke was going to fall I’d try to be right underneath it when it goes off. Getting instantly vaporized is much better than dying from radiation burns and poisoning.