M10 Booker: Anytime, Anywhere
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 окт 2024
- General Dynamics Land Systems won the Army’s Mobile Protected Firepower competition in 2022 and will deliver the combat vehicle recently named the M10 Booker. The Booker has commonality with the Abrams SEPv3 turret systems and is designed with larger-caliber main gun growth capability to provide protected firepower and unmatched lethality to Infantry Brigade Combat Teams (IBCTs). The Booker features add-on armor panels and under-vehicle IED protection, plus proven ammunition compartmentalization for crew safety. Its high power-to-weight ratio and hydro-pneumatic suspension provide outstanding speed and cross-country maneuverability. The Booker is built to meet all transport mode specifications and is recoverable with organic IBCT assets.
This is the first time in my life a contractor has tried to advertise a whole goddamn tank to me.
saab likes advertising the gripen to me
Best part is, it's working!
go see the swedish tank comercials lol
@SavageTamale yeah i know them, but they're before my time, so I can't say they're advertised to me.
Unless there's-- new ones?
First time you’ve come across them then
Cause they’ve been doing this a long time
These Warthunder Graphics are getting crazy.
ikr
What BR is this tho…
@@StarReveurMA in all seriousness, it would likely be 11.3. It's basically a smaller IPM1 with less armor that would get a scout drone and gets Gen 2 thermal sights for the gunner and commander.
@@Blanchboiit should be 11.0
@@an000n definitely could be
When do preorders open
Wait in line, I was here first 😅
Too bad Boys.. got to battlefield test it first... Ukraine! Or Gaza! ??
@@sebastienleblanc2708canada
@@sebastienleblanc2708at this rate, either Taipei or Beijing.
I second this
That shot on the lawn is super impressive. Even construction vehicles would tear that lawn to shreds, booker just left some light footprints. 10/10 GDLS.
Isnt it because Western/NATO mbts use tracks made out of rubber?
@@superburrito9797 Rubber track pads. The tracks themselves are still metal.
@@superburrito9797 Yes, they are softer on the ground. They also use different shapes on their tracks vs construction equipment. It is like comparing a tractor to a truck.
I just got mine in the mail, very fast delivery.
5/5 would buy again
We must protect this beautiful machine from the War Thunder forum.
Agreed!
Filthy russian game…
War thunder players will find one way or a other to leak this lol
You can’t escape from the War Thunder community. If its a tank they’ll find a way to leak classified documents.
@@LyonPercivalLmao, imagine just judging the game because it’s Russian.
Nice to see the U.S. ground tech tree get something other than an abrams
Glad to see I wasn't the only one in this mindset.
It is spanish..
@@carlosechevarria1977 The chassis its derived from is Austrian and Spanish. Aside from that its American.
Should have been called the M10 Wolverine II for name-sake.
Yeah, BUT i think the Booker name is great. Honoring TWO Medal of Honor recipients... one of which served in the Infamous "Thunder Run" into Baghdad in '03.
That man climbed out of his tank and engaged Iraqi targets on top of his vehicle with his M4 as they blitzed down the highway. (A company, 1st Battalion, 64th Armored Regiment)
RIP Stevon A Booker, a true American.
Wolverine was not the official name of the vehicle, the M10 GMC never got one officially, along with the M36.
The official designation would also need to be that of an American General/Hero in this case for traditions sake.
Very happy that the US is back to putting more stress on divisional combat and reinforcing divisions, as well as returning the lighter tank concept, without compromising firepower. Much love and respect (thanks for your service) from your humble NATO ally - Bulgaria
🇺🇸 ❤️ 🇧🇬
I'ts a video game. Wait the digital Lancet
@@gallinarabiosaNo, it's real
@@gallinarabiosa its not a video game lol
@@python3215 poor children! what a bad eye you have! Video games and fap have definitely wreaked havoc on your neurons.
"Get a LAW up here to knock out that gun emplacement!"
"Wait one, sir. We've got something better."
finally a car that i can drive my kids to school with
Does this come in the extended version I have 4 kids. Going on 5....
This is Echo 419, you know our motto, we deliver.
There it is! I've been searching for this comment!
Heyy, I didn't know you made house calls, Foehammer!
This is what I want regularly in my RUclips Recommended.
I LOVE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX!!
NCD is eternal
@@whybndsuWhat is NCD?
@@Ramzi1944non credible defense
Sometimes people whine about it .. but we have the kind of military stuff you can only get if you spend a LOT of money.
Beta-male westoid soyboy lol
Former 19K here. I would bet these will be used by the 19D Scouts as well like the accursed MGS was for a time. I see immense promise in this system and have done extensive study on the info released thus far.
It's refreshing to see a design that simply aims to find a certain balance without requiring immense industrial R&D.
This will require a lot less maintenance than the MGS.
From what i saw all m10 bookers are gonna be crewed by 19k and theyre considering making a new MOS for bradley/stryker crewman instead of being crewed by infantry.
I think it's gonna be 19Ks, but I think the army is also going to stop having soldiers constantly switch between light, stryker, and mechanized units - a tanker who crews an M10 probably won't spend much time in an M1, since the doctrine for the two vehicles is different.
Same here, former 19k. I'm all about new armor, but man I can't help but think this just looks like a new version of an m1. I'm not saying it doesn't have new stuff cuz I'm not familiar with it but it just kind of looks like a repeat. It's the same 105 mm gun same coax, track system looks the same as well. What I mean if it's a better version of the old M1 that's great but National Guard Armories are full of m1's, M1A1s, m1a2s, yeah just saying
its 19k 19d is no longer a mos lol fuck em
The M10 will be a great addition to our military.
In what sense? Like the stryker would be a good addition and it was not? 105mm is outdated by everysense. US should just buy CV90120 which is a platform that is well tested but the US likes to waste money on useless and expensive equipment.
@@anton2417 the 105mm Main Gun is deadly enough to destroy a T-72, do I need mention that Israeli tankers literally used a 105mm Main Gun of an American M-60 Patton to destroy a Soviet T-72, do I need to say more and also this 105mm Main Gun is a Rifles Cannon (M35) is which is still deadly to Legacy Soviet Era tanks like the T-72, T-80 and T-90 and even older tanks from the Soviet Union
@@aarontactical a 105mm can not pen any modern russian tanks this cannon isnt new nor does it benefit of having a rifled barrel since that is literally pointless when you have apfsds, heat or atgms. But I guess the only way you would use this is with hesh or he since the cannon is useless for everything else. US should just buy cv90120. Most modular tank design, and miles ahead of Bradley as an ifv.
@@anton2417I was talking about the 105mm rifled main gun being able to destroy Legacy Soviet Era tanks like the T-72, T-80 and T-90, its still literally capable of at least destroying a obsolete Tank like the Legacy Soviet systems
@@aarontactical so you're designing a brand new tank that cant destroy modern russian tanks, I would expect nothing less from the us gouvernment. They retired the stryker with just 20 years of service to waste more money on something that sure isnt much better. I would have looked into the CV90. Very versatile platorm that has models for every use. They could have literally bought cv90120 to replace stryker and cv9030 or 35 to replace Bradley.
GENERAL DYNAMICS AIN'T PREGNANT BUT THEY DELIVER 🔥🔥🔥🦅💯💯💯
Well done! What an absolute unit! 🇺🇲🦅🇺🇲
A revolutionary step-up in the new armored fighting doctrine, now you just need to make it open top and sports a 76
Glad light(er) tanks are back in fashion
Vidéo très impressionnante.
Merci pour le partage !
When can i buy one? Does it come with premuim time, backups and golden eagles? Pre order title?
Damm, its surprisingly delicate on the surface it rolls on, gotta love light tanks
Just pre-ordered mine, can’t wait to get my hands on this bad boy!
Not only is it a great vehicle, the music for this thing is amazing.
It weighs only 7 tons less than the most modern Russian tank, the T-90M, which is believed to be able to withstand up 800mm of APFSDS penetration.
This thing survives maybe 30mm.
Also, T-90 has a more powerful gun and lower profile. (lol)
@@IvanTre The T-90M is not something very comparable with an assault gun. An MBT requires a lot of armor, heavy firepower, high firepower, and big mobility. The T90M is that, and to be used in multiple purposes. The M10 is *not* that. It's an assault gun, meant to be air-droppable and rapid response for airborne units like the 82nd. And especially used to assist infantry in assaults by destroying fortifications and other infantry, while providing some protection, good firepower, and range.
The M10 is not an MBT. The T-90M is.
@@isaacfriedlandercohen4940
... if it has none of the features of a T90, why is it barely lighter?
Because of it's size, survivability, probable decent armor, and high power engine. I also never said it doesn't have the features of a T-90, I just said isn't an MBT. You can't expect it to have the same capabilities as one. Anyways, the T-90 is much smaller, but still requires the high caliber and high armor required of an MBT, which is probably why it gets it weight. If it was the same size as a Booker, or even an Abrams, it would weigh much more.
@@isaacfriedlandercohen4940 Booker doesn't have decent armor, it's APC tier.
It can't possibly have decent armor because it's too large.
It's a turkey. It's a concept as stupid as MBT powered by batteries.
Thank god for general dynamics land systems for a beautiful vehicle it looks amazing also banger song
At 0:54, is the material of the vision blocks on the cupola birefringence, polarization, or some other phenomenon?
Dismissing the entire potential of a tank due to the mistakes of a few operators is unjustifiable. Let's not overlook the fact that it's the operator, not the vehicle, that determines its effectiveness on the battlefield in the Ukraine War for example.
Can't wait to see the upgrades done on this beauty. Reminds me a lot of the CV90-105/120, I wonder what are their main differences?
You got me sold. where can i buy one? or thousand?
where are variants of the vehicles because I want a version with twin 50mm bushmaster pls 🥺 Also an unmanned turret one too.
The modern version of “twin 50’s”! I like it!
Is there turret stabilization?
is there any pre order bonuses or should i wait for it to release ?
Do you guys have payment plans?
Rear mounted turrets are so back baby
yeah sure i'll buy one how much does it cost
Wow, what a nice tank, i surely hope that it would not get canceled after years of development
Do we get a preorder camo?
Hey when can we pre order this?
Oh man that’s CRAZY!… I’ll take 2!
where do i order one
My new favorite modern armored vehicle
You just know the crews are going to call it the Booger
Well, Moscow left the Abrams crews picking their noses, didn't they? lol
@@hallowedbeyourdays Out of boredom, Russia spending 2 years in Ukraine is crazy.
@@klanox-uq1lt I think you mean 3 years in ukraine
Wonderful!
ARMA goin CRAZY with that realism.
"The Booker has commonality with the Abrams SEPv3 turret systems and is designed with larger-caliber main gun growth capability"
Wait... so you're saying it can house the 120 and Trophy APS if you want it to?
Maybe the new etc cannon prototype.
@@robertungsod691 XM360? I think that was what it was called... but yeah I don't think the M256 is gonna make its way to a Booker II, just too damn heavy.
@@PeterMuskrat6968 Definitely XM360, plus that'd let it use AMP and M829A4
where can I pre-order
Could I buy one of these for recreational use?
How much is the battle pass?
What I’m interested is how many rounds can fire per minute, how deep water it can cross, What’s the fuel efficiency, It’s very important for the crew in the battlefield.
Do yall deliver this?
gorgeous looking tank
I'm just waiting for a washing machine trailer to drop
It’s not orcish for shits sake! WE can afford our OWN washing machines!
do you do liver?
the bookers gonna book it there
Finally, an M10 with a fast turret
Is this item still available?
Can I get mine with heated seats and Apple Car Play?
How can i order? is A/C Optional or part of the base model? id like to have one in brown mica exterior paint, can we add individual TE37 on every track wheel? also front lift, the interior must be white and brown, also i want to tick the upgrades to the navigation system. THanks.
It looks like a tank, fires a shell like a tank, but it’s not a tank! It’s the booker!
Wow Big D! I will take two. If you could do the paint like a CV90 on mine and my wife would like purple tiger print. How many cup holders and does it have wi-fi? Hows the leg room?
Anywhere, anytime, god bless the airborne
Wow phohamer i didn't know you cared.
Well you know our moto "We deliver!"
Are student discounts available?
America’s first light tank since decades
Dang new war thunder PREMIUM tank , super cool!
Ok but does it have heated leather interior, because if not then thats a dealbreaker
Excellent job on the video, and obviously the design and fabrication of the machine.
do you guys do other paintjobs or is that aftermarket?
When Heng Long releasing this?
when is the flamethrower-holding rover gonna be out?
Dang, even tanks shoot low/left!
Damn the new graphics update for WT is sick
GENERAL DYNAMICS PLEASE HIRE ME AS A POWER ARMOR TEST PILOT I AM COMPLETELY NORMAL AND CAN BE TRUSTED TO BECOME AN UNSTOPPABLE JUGGERNAUT
Pinnacle of engineering
Is this designed to fire the M900 apfsds?
Hello I'd like to have one delivered to me, how long will that take?
Hope the Philippines will add this tank to list❤
War Thunder partnership when?
I'll take three!
I'm assuming this is being made available for home defense?
This tank was selected by the US Army over the competing M8 Buford light tank, even though the M10 Booker has identical weapons, has less protection, costs and weighs 3 times as much, can't be airdropped, and can't be airlifted in a C-130 Hercules.
The M10 Booker also weighs the same as China's Type 96 Main Battle Tank, yet has the armor of an APC.
This tank is peak Post-Kabul Pentagon.
Finally, someone pointed it out! Sergeant York 2.0 here we come!
@@tablesizeproductions4360 That anyone can promote the M10 Booker with a straight face is baffling; you can see how worthless it is just by comparing it's most basic stats to those of any other tank.
However, consider Argentina's TAM Medium Tank, which --- like the M210 Booker --- was derived from an IFV (in this case the VCTP, which is effectively a clone of the Marder 1). Both use 105mm main guns proofed to fire exactly the same ammunition, but the TAM has thicker and stronger armor while weighing 33 short tons, compared to 45 for the M10 Booker. The TAM also costs several times less, even after later modernizations that brought it's electronics to a much closer parity with the M10.
More importantly, the TAM was developed in the 1970s, and over 40 years later, GDLS and the Pentagon STILL can't do anything right.
So then what was the reason they chose the M10 over the M8?
@@Trainboy1EJR The real reason is what the Pentagon rationalizes it as "preservation of the industrial base", but is actually just cutting favors for sweetheart manufacturers that no longer have the competence to be competitive.
An infamous example was the AMSA program (later re-dubbed the B-1 program) in the late 1960s, in which the Rockwell proposal was declared the winner. The USAF later admitted that the Boeing proposal was both cheaper and better performing, but they chose the Rockwell B-1 for "preservation of the industrial base", because Boeing (fresh from B-52 production and with tons of missile programs, in addition to a range of successful civilian airliners) was thriving and healthy, while Rockwell (with no ongoing aircraft programs other than the last orders for the CV-10 Bronco and C-123 Provider) was circling the drain. It was all for naught; the 240 authorized Mach 2.4 B-1As devolved into 100 Mach 1.3 B-1Bs (the rest of the B-1 fiasco is a whole other can of worms), after which Rockwell was never able to sell anyone on any other aircraft designs, and ended up merging with Boeing anyway.
At present, look at US armored vehicle production, and it's instantly obvious that the M1 Booker was a GDLS bailout. The M1 Abrams is in trouble, as the last new-build chassis' were constructed in the 1990s, ending the possibility of more units being built (other than 77 M1A2s, all other M1A2s built for the US Army were converted from M1s and IPM1s built before 1984!), the US Army getting rid of all of it's M1A1s, and the USMC quitting the tank business altogether. GDLS also had the Stryker, but that ship has sailed. The Army has abandoned several Stryker variants altogether (including the once-celebrated M1128 Stryker MGS, which were all purged from the inventory a couple years ago), new-build sales to them are winding-down, the USMC won't touch it with a 10-foot pole, and the US State Department has been struggling for decades to find export customers.
Meanwhile, BAE Systems uis raking-in the dough, winning the AMPV Competition aimed at producing a replacement for the M113, upgrading the M109A6 Paladin into the M109A7 Paladin PIM, new major orders for M777 howitzers all over the world, and winning the ACV competition meant to furnish the USC with a replacement for the LAV 8x8 armored vehicles, just to name a few.
That the M8 Buford is the correct choice for the US Army has been self-evident since the 1990s, but BAe (who now owns rights to it, having absorbed UDLP) keeps winning and winning and winning, while GDLS keeps losing and losing and losing. Without selling the M10 Booker to the US Army, GDLS would be at risk of having to fold their US branch.
@@BlacktailDefense Ahh, a bailout, makes sense. Can’t be down to a single company after all.
Good for new drivers and small families
Can I get this medical prescription for this?
Is it drone proof?
What caliber is this
Where can i buy this lawn mower?
So an individual can buy this or what GD?
How do you change the oil on it?
Where can I buy one?
Does it use apple car play or Android auto? Thank you
WT moment
Where do I get one of these again?
I don't get the purpose of this vehicle. Can someone explain to mewhat sort of circumstances this vehicle would excel in over an AFV or MBT?
Where can i get one?
When can I buy this
M10 Bonker
Wasn't the M10 Booker supposed to be a more mobile firing point, a support vehicle like the MBT Merkava, and not a tank?
Yes, and GDLS and the US Army have constantly referred to it as not a tank, just some ppl call it a light tank because it looks like one and is equipped a lot like one. It’s pretty similar to ikv 91 in that respect I think
@@MS-qx9uw US Army popełnia błąd i marnuje tym sprzętem potencjał. Na Ukrainie lekkie typy pojazdów nie sprawdziły się, są zbyt delikatne a pancerze aluminiowe to zupełna porażka. Podobnie jak śmigłowce i lotnictwo pola walki. Środki niszczenia są zbyt potężne i precyzyjne. To moje odczucie po wysłuchaniu różnych komentarzy.
Gaijin when
Sheeeit, so long as its under 10k I'll buy one
Link to store page plz?