Often in chess videos, especially for relative beginners like myself, the narrator often neglects to either explain what the idea is for both white and black, or what the goal is of certain moves in enough detail, which might not be clear to some. You excel in that respect though, you're so clear and easy to follow. Thank you!
+Dereque Kelley I know I'm late to the party, but seriously, you're awesome. You're demeanor is so welcoming, and I know I'm getting clear thoughts and ideas with your videos. Huge thumbs up and thank you so much.
Great videos! For a majority of chess videos that I find online, I often lose focus or get tired. Your videos do a great job of keeping the energy up and keeping me focused with the ideas. Keep up the good work!
I really like your explanations. Very few people go to the length of both explaining why the openings are the way they are, and the reasons not to make certain moves. Even though I have learned many openings by rote, it's not always clear why they are structured the way they are. Great video, and series, thank you.
Hi Dereque, Thank you for the well-presented chess lessons. May I suggest that you present the lessons when they involve black openings from black's perspective of the board? I enjoy your chess lessons,and enjoy how you present them, Dereque. Good luck with your chess career, and keep up the great teaching of chess to us mere mortals!
You are the best Chess instructor/coach I have ever witnessed. I am so proud of what you have accomplished. You enunciate your words and have great passion for what you teach. The passion comes out in your teaching that lets us feel your excitement for the game and the beauty of it all. It makes me want to learn more and helps me memorize the information better. You make Chess fun and I can't thank you enough for sharing your passion and knowledge with the rest of the world! You are awesome Dereque! You are #1!
Finally, I found my counter for my very own most powerful opening. Thank you. your the real one who explain it very clearly and very simple. its easy now. your great man. please show us more.
I really liked all of your ideas.I agree with some comments that it would be nice to flip the board so we can see it more clearly from black's prespective because this video is after all about how to counter the queen's gambit rather than how to play it. Have you done a video on the Slav defence because that's the one which I know lots of people employ against D4?
Thank you for taking the time to explain the goals of both sides of the opening. As someone who's bad at this game (but getting better), I find that understanding why certain moves are played is much more important than knowing which moves are played. Subscribed. Keep it up!
I have to say, after browsing youtube for a week to learn something about chess in order to be able to play with my old man, your videos have been the most helpful. Exploring all the possibilities of the different openings instead of following certain lines into the middle and end game has helped me understand WHY the pieces are played the way they are. Other international and grand masters haven't been able to convey that information to me so far. Hope you keep giving us little guys something to watch for a long time!
Nice video, been looking for a decent chess channel for along time. Most just skip over the fundamentals and don't properly explain why each move is the best but you do. Clear, concise and easy to follow. Subbed
Thank you for this great content, Dereque. At 5:30, you mentioned how white had the advantage of occupying Queen's Pawn at D4. I'm new to actual strategy and tactics and I'm having trouble seeing how White holds the upper hand in that scenario when it looks like Black has the advantage to my untrained eye. Also, thanks for making videos for Black's opening responses as I almost always play as Black.
It is a complicated question, I will not reply it here okay, maybe sometime it can be revealed or you could take private session or two or three(from me) and then you would understand the answer to this I'm very sure about it
As a lifelong mediocre chess player, I always abhorred playing against D4 and the 'Queen's Gambit.' This video is an inspiration and unlike many other chess presenters out there, this young man cuts to the chase and explains things clearly and concisely both in terms of tactics and overall strategy without getting bogged down in too many 'lines.' I'm impressed!
This is a very good chess teacher. He thoroughly explains every move and the ideas behind them. I've learned a lot about chess from watching his videos. Other chess teachers should emulate him.
Wow i am impressed with this instructor's presentation! Seriously he is by far one of the best who explains complicated chess ideas in a very simple understandable fashion. The level of instruction also is high even if the material covered appeals mostly to beginners and intermediates. I really enjoyed watching his body and eye movement which seems as if he is enjoying teaching chess. Great work and nice video presentation with the voice over the chess board. The lightning is fine and room appears bright enough. The voice is a bit amplified by the closed glasss room environment. It is a bit disturbing i think, but it still sounds loud and clear nonetheless. The material covered should be more extensive or perhaps another video should follow this one teaching chess openings ideas mainly for the intermediate/advanced level. Overall the video is excellent and deseves an award. Great presentation and wonderful production. I give it 5 stars out of 5.
I think the strongest reply against d4 is either the Grunfeld or the Slav, though. The problem I have with the nimzo-indian defense is that it seems like development is harder to achieve, especially with the queenside knight; it seems a bit cramped. With the Grunfeld, while thats true in the exchange variation, the Grunfeld puts tons of pressure on the vulnerable c3 square which can slow and stop ideas for white, well, technically/maybe. I also mentioned the Slav because its played at Grandmaster level all the time and its definitely a sound defense choice. I don't know much about the slav though, other than the Semi-slav botvinnik variation.
It's amazing how glasses change he image of a person. You're the same, but somehow it's different. Sorry for that comment, i like your videos, glasses or not!
This was a very nice explanation. I’m new to chess and my tendency is to want to memorize openings, but it’s far better to understand the themes and what each side is trying to accomplish to improve my overall understanding of the game and basics tactics. I love it! Thanks!
This video goes far beyond what the title suggests, explaining the themes behind 1e4 AND 1 d4. The knowledge I gained was invaluable. Thanks Dereque- I love your videos!
Please change the title....there is no such thing as strongest reply. Its what black wants to play... solid or sharp... How is the Nimzo stronger than grunfeld or kings indian or whatever... all normal openings are good.
Marty Bishop cause of statistics i would assume, ah the end of the day playing the nimzo might have higher win and draw rates as opposed to anything with 1d5 for example
What statistics? I you'd only take all the games of Fischer and Kasparov played with Nimzo or Grünfeld or King's Indian you could also well explain why they had a better score with the Nimzo-Indian! Because they used it as a surprise weapon and not as their standard response to 1 d4! During his matches with Karpov Kasparov swiched to Grünfeld (instead of his beloved King's Indian) because he felt Karpov is less well prepared. Probably Kasparov was right doing so! After his last match with Karpov Kasparov went on playing the King's Indian again! So even statistic isn't telling all the truth! xD
MusikPiratCH you are considering games from the best players ever, we dont evento begin to grasp most of their moves, dereque is teaching normal people not súper Gm's
Yeah, these videos were some of the videos I stumbled upon in the years prior to me doing chess RUclips myself (2020). Always interesting videos to watch
This guy really has a gift at running down multiple variations by explaining the logic behind the moves in a way that's easy to understand. I can't believe how much ground he covered in 14 minutes. I guess you could classify his style as 'cheerful logic'. Good presentation. Looking forward to more videos as I digest what I've already seen.
Mr. Kelley, thank you for the great videos! I would like to make a personal request if you haven't had in mind already. I was hoping for some thought on the Berlin Defense. Thanks either way!
There is no strongest reply. I think there are better choices just to equalize and better choices if you must win as black. For example KID and Grunfeld gives more winning chances than the QGD Lasker variation for instance , but they are also more risky. I think it is "easier" to equalize with the QGD Lasker than with the Grunfeld and the KID.
Excellent video! Your explanations cover the prime moves very well, your speech is clear, and the audio is great. Thank you for sharing, much appreciated!!!
Dereque, I have a chess team at one of the correspondence chess sites (GameKnot) and I'm recommending your videos as we play French Winawer/Nimzo-Indian/Queen's Indian with a rolled up response of: 1....e6 to 1.e4/1.d4/1.c4 etc. Your videos give us a good grounding in each of these openings. French Winawer and Nimzo do share ideas with the pawn doubling, so learning the theory behind is helped by the clustering of ideas. We also recommend 1.Nf3 (Reti/Barcza/KIA) for white. Any chance for a video on that opening set? Again, ideas behind the various opening sets would be good and I think it could be popular. With the team, I stress that white can usually get away with the fist 6 moves of the Barcza set up for most defenses black puts up. We stress a narrowed opening set for beginners, and study of tactics/endgames/mating patterns and game analysis to progress more quickly rather than get bogged down on opening memorization as we simply want to get them to a playable middle game. We also stay away from the weird/offbeat/flank openings as you cannot grow with those over time and yet too many folks fall into them because they simply don't want to spend time on opening study. Good Chess, Alex
Fantastic videos. He really goes out of his way to illustrate underlying concepts and increase fundamental understanding of the positions. Love my new weapons.
Thank you so much, lichess have introduced a new feature - chess insights, recently and I realized from the statistics that I didn't know what to do really for 1.d4 as Black. Typed in A40 in the search box, and now things are much clearer.
One thing I love about chess is that I can look at these 7, or 10 year old openings videos and still learn very useful stuff for today. The meta doesnt shift too much.
8:49 doesn't advancing the C or D black pawns two squares subject them to 'en passent'? It'll screw up white's game plan, but will cripple blacks pawn position.
+algol291 No. En passant is only applicable to pawns that could have been captured had they only been one square but were instead moved two squares. White would have to have a pawn on the sixth rank to peform en passant. If white had pawns on c4 and d5, and if black plays c5, then the d5 pawn can capture the c5 pawn (because it would have been possible had it only moved once, ie. to c6).
Excellent video, he explains so clearly, and with so many variations, it gives you a lot of choices in case white plays in different ways. Subscribed!!
You are very easy to hear and understand.. It is obvious you know what you will say before the video begins. I was sick of videos by people for whom English was not their native language and they mumble and do not decide what level of player they are aimed at. I regularly recommend your videos to my chess students!
I've learned a lot from your series! I would say, however, that after 1.d4 e6, the reason some players don't want to play 2.e4 is that they don't want to be transposed into the 1.e4 mainline (French defence). Because the player may be more well versed in the usual Queen pawn opening set-ups (that's why he/she avoided 1.e4 right?) If player playing Black is comfortable with the French defense, he/she should consider playing 1.d4 e6 -- it does offer quite a bit of flexibility for transposition (e.g. If playing for the Dutch defense, it can avoid some annoying 1.d4 f5 2.Bg5!? lines) Not sure if you may have any opinion on this view.
Thanks for explaining why the King doesn't try the f-pawn. I had vaugely wondered about that in the course of considering other things, but you made so clear that I could even explain it to someone else.
you explain everything!lol you even explianed why moving f pawn too early is dangerous but moving the c pawn is profitable.you are great my friend thanks to you i was always confused between the slav,nimzo,KID,semi slav.big thanks
Thanks for the detailed and concise videos. I love the straight to the point style. Also IMO it would be nice if when you explained a move primarily meant for Black's perspective you flipped the board. Thanks again.
Good video, Dereque. I've been playing primarily the Queen's Gambit since the early eighties, though, and outside of the first 3 or 4 times, the Nimzo-Indian has never really given me any trouble. I usually play Qd3 immediately after Nb4, to force the exchange of the Bishop for the Knight, and then Qxc3, avoiding the disruption of the queenside pawn chain and obtaining the two bishops.
+Querent2000 4.Qd3 is a possibility but I have some questions : 1) Does that move can favor the development of White's forces, most of all the bishop on f1? 2) Does the Queen is really safe on d3? This piece seems to be more exposed on the d3 square than in the 4.Qc2 variation. 3) Why Black would be forced to take the White knight on c3? Black can attack the center and try to open it by 4...c5 for example. Black can castle very quickly unlike White and will have a lead in development.
+TheAvenger766 Actually at first glance, this move should just about transpose into 4.Qc2 as after 4.Qd3 O-O 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.Qxc3 we have a transposition. 4...d5!? is also possible. In this case after a standard reply like 5.cxd5 exd5 6.Bg5 h6 Black can celebrate the fact that the queen is somewhat misplaced on d3, blocking White's most logical development scheme of e3, Bd3 (White still has g3 but the bishop may not be as well situated there in these kinds of Queen's Gambit Declined setups, but this is a long story to go into here :)
Dereque Kelley 4...d5 is a good option. It prevents the rush e2-e4 and Black can develop his pieces easily, whereas White have troubles to do so. However I prefer 4...c5 with the threat 5...cxd4 6. Dxd4 Cc6 winning a tempo on the Queen. After the withdraw of the Queen, Black could castle and would prepare the rush ...d7-d5 very soon. If Black manages to open the center, White would be in serious trouble. White would have to neutralize Black' scheme while trying to develop his own pieces. Not quite the ideal way to start a game.
Thank you so much, I appreciate it! Glad to hear you're getting a lot of the time you spend looking at the videos we've prepared. It's a privilege to hear this! :)
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Often in chess videos, especially for relative beginners like myself, the narrator often neglects to either explain what the idea is for both white and black, or what the goal is of certain moves in enough detail, which might not be clear to some. You excel in that respect though, you're so clear and easy to follow. Thank you!
leerobbo92 Thank you for the kind words, much appreciated!
Yup
Well said !!!!
@@KebuChess you are the best honestly. I'd love to see you cover more about chess after openings. such as tactics and end games
As a relatively low rated player I find the clarity of your explanations of the various variations refreshing and very helpful. Thanks!
Hes great. Gothamchess is great too. Levy is still active, I miss these vids but at least theres still a great channel with quality updated content.
} 06
You suck because your name is Joe. nobody named Joe ever had been good in chess
@@jerrygraves6531 Joe mama
You suck more because your name is Graves. Nobody dead has ever been good at chess
You are an excellent instructor. A clear presentation of the ideas behind one of the chess openings.
Dan Kelly So great to hear you're enjoying the videos my friend!
+Dereque Kelley Yes, nice job bro! Your videos are very helpful :)
+Dereque Kelley I know I'm late to the party, but seriously, you're awesome. You're demeanor is so welcoming, and I know I'm getting clear thoughts and ideas with your videos. Huge thumbs up and thank you so much.
Man, you are so incredibly happy, it's a pleasure watching your videos.
You sure do enjoy what you're doing, keep that up!
Deep0r Lol! Thanks :)
@@KebuChess are you a master sir?
@@enlightenedwarrior7119 Yes I am an National Master! :) I have won the title about 9 years ago!! :) :)
@@KebuChess National Master! I throway salute!🙋🏿♂️
6:07 "in the game of chess."
Wait, this is a chess tutorial? ~Drops badminton racket ~
Good stuff btw :)
Haha ;)
Thanks
*racquet
one of my fav youtube comments of all time
The best opening videos out there, hands down. Thanks, Dereque for the clear presentation, excellent production values and awesome attitude!
Great videos! For a majority of chess videos that I find online, I often lose focus or get tired. Your videos do a great job of keeping the energy up and keeping me focused with the ideas. Keep up the good work!
Excellent, this is great to hear! Thank yoU! :)
I really like your explanations. Very few people go to the length of both explaining why the openings are the way they are, and the reasons not to make certain moves. Even though I have learned many openings by rote, it's not always clear why they are structured the way they are. Great video, and series, thank you.
Dude, Dereque is fabulous.
Thank you, that's very kind!
Dereque Kelley Love how you cover the basics!
True!
:)
:D
Best tutorials I've seen. Thank you! I'd like to see your recommendations for an intermediate repertoire for white and black.
Hi Dereque, Thank you for the well-presented chess lessons. May I suggest that you present the lessons when they involve black openings from black's perspective of the board? I enjoy your chess lessons,and enjoy how you present them, Dereque. Good luck with your chess career, and keep up the great teaching of chess to us mere mortals!
You are the best Chess instructor/coach I have ever witnessed. I am so proud of what you have accomplished. You enunciate your words and have great passion for what you teach. The passion comes out in your teaching that lets us feel your excitement for the game and the beauty of it all. It makes me want to learn more and helps me memorize the information better. You make Chess fun and I can't thank you enough for sharing your passion and knowledge with the rest of the world! You are awesome Dereque! You are #1!
Thank you so much, I super appreciate this! :)
This is by far the best chess video I came across. I had to sub!
Welcome and thank you!! :)
Jovani Goins k
Very nice. Just one remark. The room reflects your voice a lot from the walls and windows
Excellent, thank you for the feedback!! :)
absolutely fantastic as always man you're so easy to watch and to follow thanks for another great video
Thank you! :)
Finally, I found my counter for my very own most powerful opening.
Thank you.
your the real one who explain it very clearly and very simple.
its easy now.
your great man.
please show us more.
Very descriptive, nice video! One of the bests reviews I watched so far! Thank you!
I really liked all of your ideas.I agree with some comments that it would be nice to flip the board so we can see it more clearly from black's prespective because this video is after all about how to counter the queen's gambit rather than how to play it. Have you done a video on the Slav defence because that's the one which I know lots of people employ against D4?
You are very good at explaining and backing up what u say
Thank you for taking the time to explain the goals of both sides of the opening. As someone who's bad at this game (but getting better), I find that understanding why certain moves are played is much more important than knowing which moves are played. Subscribed. Keep it up!
Thank you for subscribing, welcome! I appreciate your kind words! :)
What I like most about the Nimzo set up 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 is its flexibility. Black may play a Queens Gambit declined;Nimzo,Queens Indian;or Benoni
examinfo :)
examinfo that's why I play e6, even more flexibility with the French being added
Jonathan Johnson and dutch
I usually play g6 because I'm fond of the King's Indian Defense.
You can play Bogo indian defense too
I find your explanations the easiest to understand of all the videos I've watched. Easiest to understand, yet thorough and intelligent! Thank you.
Thanks so much, I super appreciate it!! :) :) :) :)
Super presentation as usual. Thank you!
I love how simple and easy to understand this guy's explanations are. I just wish I wasn't too stupid to remember any of this stuff.
Super clear and informative - great video
I have to say, after browsing youtube for a week to learn something about chess in order to be able to play with my old man, your videos have been the most helpful. Exploring all the possibilities of the different openings instead of following certain lines into the middle and end game has helped me understand WHY the pieces are played the way they are. Other international and grand masters haven't been able to convey that information to me so far. Hope you keep giving us little guys something to watch for a long time!
I absolutely am in love with your voice and clear analysis! Thank you bunches and you have my sub!
Thank you very much! I appreciate it! :)
Nice video, been looking for a decent chess channel for along time. Most just skip over the fundamentals and don't properly explain why each move is the best but you do. Clear, concise and easy to follow. Subbed
Thank you for joining us! I much appreciate the kind remarks!!
Very clear instruction. Very Good.
Thank you for this great content, Dereque. At 5:30, you mentioned how white had the advantage of occupying Queen's Pawn at D4. I'm new to actual strategy and tactics and I'm having trouble seeing how White holds the upper hand in that scenario when it looks like Black has the advantage to my untrained eye. Also, thanks for making videos for Black's opening responses as I almost always play as Black.
It is a complicated question, I will not reply it here okay, maybe sometime it can be revealed or you could take private session or two or three(from me) and then you would understand the answer to this I'm very sure about it
As a lifelong mediocre chess player, I always abhorred playing against D4 and the 'Queen's Gambit.' This video is an inspiration and unlike many other chess presenters out there, this young man cuts to the chase and explains things clearly and concisely both in terms of tactics and overall strategy without getting bogged down in too many 'lines.' I'm impressed!
This is a very good chess teacher. He thoroughly explains every move and the ideas behind them. I've learned a lot about chess from watching his videos. Other chess teachers should emulate him.
Wow i am impressed with this instructor's presentation! Seriously he is by far one of the best who explains complicated chess ideas in a very simple understandable fashion. The level of instruction also is high even if the material covered appeals mostly to beginners and intermediates. I really enjoyed watching his body and eye movement which seems as if he is enjoying teaching chess. Great work and nice video presentation with the voice over the chess board. The lightning is fine and room appears bright enough. The voice is a bit amplified by the closed glasss room environment. It is a bit disturbing i think, but it still sounds loud and clear nonetheless. The material covered should be more extensive or perhaps another video should follow this one teaching chess openings ideas mainly for the intermediate/advanced level. Overall the video is excellent and deseves an award. Great presentation and wonderful production. I give it 5 stars out of 5.
Thank you so much!! I appreciate the kind words!! :)
You get 3/5 stars for your comment. Too wordy.
Plot twist: j/k
It's remarkable that I never see any negative comments on your videos. I think that's a huge tribute to your talent and presentation.
Absolutely brilliant video, I always struggle when playing d5 reply and your explanation articulated it perfectly, thanks for making this.
Thank you much, I'm glad this video was valuable for you!! :)
I love the enthusiasm of the speaker and the clear explanations.
Very good and clear explanations. I've always liked the Nimzo as black, and from what I've sen white often try to avoid it if they can.
Thank you, glad you enjoyed the video!
Clear analysis and good background. Very well put together video and well said!!
+Chess64 Glad to hear you enjoyed the video! :)
I think the strongest reply against d4 is either the Grunfeld or the Slav, though. The problem I have with the nimzo-indian defense is that it seems like development is harder to achieve, especially with the queenside knight; it seems a bit cramped. With the Grunfeld, while thats true in the exchange variation, the Grunfeld puts tons of pressure on the vulnerable c3 square which can slow and stop ideas for white, well, technically/maybe. I also mentioned the Slav because its played at Grandmaster level all the time and its definitely a sound defense choice. I don't know much about the slav though, other than the Semi-slav botvinnik variation.
***** These are excellent insights and it's clear that you know you're stuff :)
Dereque Kelley *your
Cleverconure Gruenfield and Botvinnik variation of Slav are both strong fighters.
Thank you for introducting newbies like me to basic opening theory. You do it with in a very explicative and detailed way.
This guys should do more chess videos, especially with the chess hype that's going on rn.
Thank you, I truly agree! And thank you for the kind words!! -Krishna :)
Brilliant video, Dereque! I love the way you thorougly explain the ideas behind the openings. Every one of your videos is like that.
It's amazing how glasses change he image of a person. You're the same, but somehow it's different. Sorry for that comment, i like your videos, glasses or not!
Walküre Unruh :):)
This was a very nice explanation. I’m new to chess and my tendency is to want to memorize openings, but it’s far better to understand the themes and what each side is trying to accomplish to improve my overall understanding of the game and basics tactics. I love it! Thanks!
Just reading the title I knew it was the Nimzo-indian. It causes headache to d4 players.
+Enrique Ibarra Yeah, hehe
+Enrique Ibarra :) :)
Nope
This video goes far beyond what the title suggests, explaining the themes behind 1e4 AND 1 d4. The knowledge I gained was invaluable. Thanks Dereque- I love your videos!
+Jono Mccon So great to hear, thank you!
The strongest reply is to flip the table and throw a tantrum
Haha :)
Best chess videos I've come across so far! Good pace, clear explanations, and he keeps you very engaged. Thank you!
Thanks! That's very kind and encouraging!
hello kelly . i have been looking for strongest reply towards e4 if you could do a video i would be thankful.thankyou
are you a speedcuber?
Ye
Yes
Where do you live?
Statistically it’s c5, sicilian defense which may evolve into Dragon and Najdorf variations and a few more with long names I can’t spell.
There are a number of videos on chess openings. Though none of them offer as much clarity and conservation of time. Well done. Thanks.
Thank you so much, I truly appreciate this!! :)
Please change the title....there is no such thing as strongest reply. Its what black wants to play... solid or sharp... How is the Nimzo stronger than grunfeld or kings indian or whatever... all normal openings are good.
Marty Bishop agreed
Marty Bishop cause of statistics i would assume, ah the end of the day playing the nimzo might have higher win and draw rates as opposed to anything with 1d5 for example
What statistics? I you'd only take all the games of Fischer and Kasparov played with Nimzo or Grünfeld or King's Indian you could also well explain why they had a better score with the Nimzo-Indian! Because they used it as a surprise weapon and not as their standard response to 1 d4!
During his matches with Karpov Kasparov swiched to Grünfeld (instead of his beloved King's Indian) because he felt Karpov is less well prepared. Probably Kasparov was right doing so! After his last match with Karpov Kasparov went on playing the King's Indian again!
So even statistic isn't telling all the truth! xD
MusikPiratCH you are considering games from the best players ever, we dont evento begin to grasp most of their moves, dereque is teaching normal people not súper Gm's
Thanks for the feedback Marty!
Yeah, these videos were some of the videos I stumbled upon in the years prior to me doing chess RUclips myself (2020). Always interesting videos to watch
what a great video!!
This guy really has a gift at running down multiple variations by explaining the logic behind the moves in a way that's easy to understand. I can't believe how much ground he covered in 14 minutes. I guess you could classify his style as 'cheerful logic'. Good presentation. Looking forward to more videos as I digest what I've already seen.
I know Finally someone who get to the point, some the gift of explanation,
the Dutch defence is strongest reply 4 me
B7
At 8:12 why shouldn’t white move a3? It’s protected by the b pawn, which can also capture on c3.
Dereque Kelley I sent a message to you awhile back, but you never replied! :-(
***** Where did you send the message?
Dereque Kelley I sent the message to your inbox.
***** I just sent a reply but it did not send a memo to say that it went through - simply deleted my message. Let me know if you didn't receive it
Mr. Kelley, thank you for the great videos! I would like to make a personal request if you haven't had in mind already. I was hoping for some thought on the Berlin Defense. Thanks either way!
This is a truly great video, I hope you upload some more in the near future.
There is no strongest reply. I think there are better choices just to equalize and better choices if you must win as black. For example KID and Grunfeld gives more winning chances than the QGD Lasker variation for instance , but they are also more risky. I think it is "easier" to equalize with the QGD Lasker than with the Grunfeld and the KID.
Thanks for sharing!
I love your videos!
i love his choice of words! making it so easy to follow.
Thank you, thank you! :)
Excellent video! Your explanations cover the prime moves very well, your speech is clear, and the audio is great. Thank you for sharing, much appreciated!!!
Thanks so much! I very much appreciate it!
This was incredible thank you
You’re enthusiasm is the infectious, thanks for the guide :)
4:54 Can someone tell me why it wouldn't be a good move for black to play Nxe4 after white castled?
I love your videos man! So much clarity and so clear and specified! They are so educational! thanks !
That's great to hear, thank you!
You explain very nicely. It's nice to see your smile while you speak.
Pleasantly surprised to see you back to make a video :)
:)
Dereque, I have a chess team at one of the correspondence chess sites (GameKnot) and I'm recommending your videos as we play French Winawer/Nimzo-Indian/Queen's Indian with a rolled up response of: 1....e6 to 1.e4/1.d4/1.c4 etc. Your videos give us a good grounding in each of these openings. French Winawer and Nimzo do share ideas with the pawn doubling, so learning the theory behind is helped by the clustering of ideas.
We also recommend 1.Nf3 (Reti/Barcza/KIA) for white. Any chance for a video on that opening set? Again, ideas behind the various opening sets would be good and I think it could be popular. With the team, I stress that white can usually get away with the fist 6 moves of the Barcza set up for most defenses black puts up.
We stress a narrowed opening set for beginners, and study of tactics/endgames/mating patterns and game analysis to progress more quickly rather than get bogged down on opening memorization as we simply want to get them to a playable middle game. We also stay away from the weird/offbeat/flank openings as you cannot grow with those over time and yet too many folks fall into them because they simply don't want to spend time on opening study.
Good Chess,
Alex
Fantastic videos. He really goes out of his way to illustrate underlying concepts and increase fundamental understanding of the positions. Love my new weapons.
Thanks so much, I super appreciate all the kind words, thank you, thank you! :)
Thank you Dereque, for your awesome explanations and awesomness
Olaf Anders Thank you Olaf!
The very best explanation and presentation style I seen! You are a phenomenal teacher!
Thank you very much, I truly appreciate this! :)
Fantastic - you show the moves while explaining the why - a quality of a fantastic coach. :)
Thank you, I super appreciate the feedback!!!! :)
love the passion in your teaching man!
Thank you so much, lichess have introduced a new feature - chess insights, recently and I realized from the statistics that I didn't know what to do really for 1.d4 as Black. Typed in A40 in the search box, and now things are much clearer.
+ziya dalkılıç :) thank you!
One thing I love about chess is that I can look at these 7, or 10 year old openings videos and still learn very useful stuff for today. The meta doesnt shift too much.
These are the best chess videos. You're a good speaker!
+Tarek Nabulsi Wow, thank you!!
Thank you, Krishna. Fantastic explanations. Crystal clear and very helpful.
Thank you! -Krishna
8:49 doesn't advancing the C or D black pawns two squares subject them to 'en passent'? It'll screw up white's game plan, but will cripple blacks pawn position.
+algol291 No. En passant is only applicable to pawns that could have been captured had they only been one square but were instead moved two squares. White would have to have a pawn on the sixth rank to peform en passant. If white had pawns on c4 and d5, and if black plays c5, then the d5 pawn can capture the c5 pawn (because it would have been possible had it only moved once, ie. to c6).
Excellent video, he explains so clearly, and with so many variations, it gives you a lot of choices in case white plays in different ways. Subscribed!!
Thank you so much! And welcome as a subscriber! :)
You are very easy to hear and understand.. It is obvious you know what you will say before the video begins. I was sick of videos by people for whom English was not their native language and they mumble and do not decide what level of player they are aimed at. I regularly recommend your videos to my chess students!
Chris Goldthorpe Thank you for recommending the videos and also for the kind words! I'm glad to hear you're finding the videos helpful! :)
I've learned a lot from your series! I would say, however, that after 1.d4 e6, the reason some players don't want to play 2.e4 is that they don't want to be transposed into the 1.e4 mainline (French defence). Because the player may be more well versed in the usual Queen pawn opening set-ups (that's why he/she avoided 1.e4 right?)
If player playing Black is comfortable with the French defense, he/she should consider playing 1.d4 e6 -- it does offer quite a bit of flexibility for transposition (e.g. If playing for the Dutch defense, it can avoid some annoying 1.d4 f5 2.Bg5!? lines)
Not sure if you may have any opinion on this view.
Please keep the fire of teaching us! I really subscribed this channel! Really informative.
Working on it, thank you!! :) :)
Happy to see your smiles with full of confidence. Thanks for the video.
Excellent video. It's great that you explain the ideas for both players in each variation.
I love the way you teach! I've recently gotten a lot into chess and you have really helped me with my opening abilities!
Excellent! Wonderful to hear
Your videos are so easy to follow, thank you for these, I learn a lot. They aren't boring either!
Thank you!! :)
Loved this. So glad I found your channel!
Wow!! So nice to see some new videos Mr Kelley :) Well done :) Thx!!
vedder758 Thank you! :)
Just discovered these. You have a great attitude and a way with teaching! Nice videos!
Thanks for explaining why the King doesn't try the f-pawn. I had vaugely wondered about that in the course of considering other things, but you made so clear that I could even explain it to someone else.
Very good, I'm glad to hear this! :)
Incredibly helpful, best channel for chess beginners
GREAT explanations... You just received a new subscriber.
you explain everything!lol you even explianed why moving f pawn too early is dangerous but moving the c pawn is profitable.you are great my friend thanks to you i was always confused between the slav,nimzo,KID,semi slav.big thanks
I love your channel! Thanks for all the work! :)
Thank you for the kind words, much appreciated!!! :)
I love everything about the aesthetics of this video!
Thanks for the detailed and concise videos. I love the straight to the point style. Also IMO it would be nice if when you explained a move primarily meant for Black's perspective you flipped the board. Thanks again.
Good video, Dereque. I've been playing primarily the Queen's Gambit since the early eighties, though, and outside of the first 3 or 4 times, the Nimzo-Indian has never really given me any trouble. I usually play Qd3 immediately after Nb4, to force the exchange of the Bishop for the Knight, and then Qxc3, avoiding the disruption of the queenside pawn chain and obtaining the two bishops.
+Querent2000
4.Qd3 is a possibility but I have some questions :
1) Does that move can favor the development of White's forces, most of all the bishop on f1?
2) Does the Queen is really safe on d3? This piece seems to be more exposed on the d3 square than in the 4.Qc2 variation.
3) Why Black would be forced to take the White knight on c3? Black can attack the center and try to open it by 4...c5 for example. Black can castle very quickly unlike White and will have a lead in development.
+Querent2000 Interesting! If it works, stick with it! Thank you for the kind words :)
+TheAvenger766 Actually at first glance, this move should just about transpose into 4.Qc2 as after 4.Qd3 O-O 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.Qxc3 we have a transposition. 4...d5!? is also possible. In this case after a standard reply like 5.cxd5 exd5 6.Bg5 h6 Black can celebrate the fact that the queen is somewhat misplaced on d3, blocking White's most logical development scheme of e3, Bd3 (White still has g3 but the bishop may not be as well situated there in these kinds of Queen's Gambit Declined setups, but this is a long story to go into here :)
Dereque Kelley
4...d5 is a good option. It prevents the rush e2-e4 and Black can develop his pieces easily, whereas White have troubles to do so.
However I prefer 4...c5 with the threat 5...cxd4 6. Dxd4 Cc6 winning a tempo on the Queen. After the withdraw of the Queen, Black could castle and would prepare the rush ...d7-d5 very soon. If Black manages to open the center, White would be in serious trouble.
White would have to neutralize Black' scheme while trying to develop his own pieces.
Not quite the ideal way to start a game.
Dereque, you are a fantastic chess teacher! Thanks; I sure get a lot out of the time I spend looking at your work.
Thank you so much, I appreciate it! Glad to hear you're getting a lot of the time you spend looking at the videos we've prepared. It's a privilege to hear this! :)
Kelly your lessons are excellent !
Thank you very much for your devotion the game.
+Luis Medina Yeah his lessons are really good.