The Rashidun Caliphate and the Islamic Conquests | Casual Historian | Islamic History
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
- Support this channel on Patreon
/ casualhistorian
What happened to Islam after the death of the Prophet Muhammad? Well, there were succession crises, assassinations, conquests, and rebellions. This time of expansion and turmoil was lead by the Rashidun, or the "Rightly Guided" Caliphs. Men who personally knew the prophet, and are recognized by all Muslims as genuine successors to Muhammad. But short sighted mistakes would lead to the end of the Rashidun Caliphate, and the Birth of the Umayyad Caliphate.
Give a one time contribution on PayPal
www.paypal.me/...
Buy me a book or piece of equipment on my Amazon Wish List
www.amazon.com...
Check Out the Blog
casualhistorian...
Check Out My History of the Modern Middle East Podcast
www.historyoft...
Ali was so upset that he named his younger sons Abubakar,umar and uthman during the caliphate of umar?
No
@@aaqibqureshi8957 His sons were named that whether you are shia or sunni or not even muslims... into simple history
no he wasnt there was nothing called the caliphate of umar and none of his sons were named that
@@abdelazizgohar758 well i am not sure about what the caliphate was called but he is right about the children's names . Umar bin ali and abi bakr bin ali were the names.
Edit :You can google that if you don't believe it.
@@aaqibqureshi8957 sorry i remembered the names right after i released the comment so i didnt know how to delete it btw ali radiallahu anhu didnt regret naming his sons names of the sahaba
If the Caliphates were a movies Trilogy.
Rashidun: The breakout, low budget hit with tons of drama
Ummayed: The big budget sequal that the fans loved, but was a bit iffy for others.
Abbasid: The finale that started off being awesome, but then completely derailed halfway through.
@quotetheraven90 u r wrong both r hated except a few of the caliphs from the both dynasty. Muslims often call there caliphate as malukuyat = regime becuz the forced themselves upon everyone and when someone didn't except them they would kill. Even madina was raided and later many of Prophets followers were martyred. And Abbasids were more into worldly affairs and they forced the first Imam Abu Hanifa into becoming his Qazi= judge which he refused and was later poisoned.
@quotetheraven90 only the Rashidun Caliphs were rightly guided.
@مذكر انصارى the spinoff netflix series that everybody hated but kept on airing for multiple seasons.
@Charles Martel probably a filler short movie, which wasn't that bad for a filler.
@@samyebeid4534 yeah it was great but they didn't last long tho I'd put it as a spin off series or something.
Too many mistakes and use of fabricated narrations:
1. The biggest contenders for the next Caliph were Abu Bakr, Umar and Saad ibn Ubada at Saqifah. After 3 days of heated debate there was a consensus under the companions of prophet Muhammad and the whole people of Madinah (of course including Ali).
Ali fully accepted the decision and was content with it. Some may argue that he came late to give Abu Bakr the pledge of allegiance but this only happened, because Ali was busy of the funeral procession of the prophet since he was part of the family.
And also from where did you get this that Aisha didnt allow to see the Prophet? Also the narrations of the hatred between them are too weak, because of the chain of narrators.
Also a sidenote: Neither Abu Bakr nor Ali had any intent on becoming the next Caliph. It was Umar who took Abu Bakrs hand gave him the pledge of allegiance in front of the Ansaar who then also gave him the pledge.
2. The narrations about Umar and Fatima are weak and this is a well known fact by the science of hadith.
And let's say this event really happened then that would mean that Ali was a weak man who couldn't even confront the man who beat his wife and killed his child.
But as it is already established in the narrations that Ali was a man of honour and would immediately kill the man who even would only dare to touch the daughter of the Prophet! This story in itself is very contradictory and made up.
3. The tribes did indeed become apostates not because some few of them didnt recognise Abu Bakrs leadership. But because they refused to accept that paying the zakah is obligatory! And some tribeleaders even called themselves prophet at the time of prophet Muhammad! So the war against the apostates began de facto at the end of his lifetime!
4. The wars with the byzantine empire and persian empire was not something so easy to accomplish by some desert bois. You have to remember that these two were the superpowers at that time. And the muslims almost all of the time were extreme under number. For example the battle of Yarmouk: Muslims=24,000-40,000 , Byzantines=100,000-200,000.
It was only surprising for these superpowers that the desert people after hundreds of years finally wanted to go out and challenge the whole world.
They couldn't comprehend the reasoning behind it. In todays age it would be like Ireland taking on the Soviet-Union and the USA.
5. The only reason of Uthman being favored over Ali was because his style of jurisprudence. Since Uthman promised to take on the same jurisprudence as Umar. The people of the Islamic State at that time were already used to the jurisprudence of 10 years by Umars time. And Ali chose to use his style of jurisprudence. Of course normally this would favor him over Uthman, because this means he is confident with his own jurisprudence! Jurisprudence= Ijtihad.
Wow I'll stop here since there are so many invented and weak narrations used in this video.
I don't know why the Uploader used exactly the weak and fabricated narrations but I'll leave it as that.
I recommend everyone to read for yourselves the history books written by well established scientists who of course only use strong narrations. This is also the beauty of science of narrations. Because of that you will know which story is fabricated and which one is authentic.
To give you some names: Ibn Ishaq, At-Tabary, Ibn Kathir, Ibn Hisham.
Alhamdulillah what a nice explaination brother. To be honest i stopped watching video after he started to narrate weak narration about Umar (R.A.) and Fathima (R.A.)
@Caliph Cordoba True. Shia movement started as a political movement without any fabrication of Hadith in the initial stage. But unfortunately now everything is changed. Anyways as a Muslim (irrespective of shia/sunni as these category not valid in our deen) we should stick to the authentic Hadith. I pray Allah will revive the khulaf-e- rashidun again
Why don’t you get back to studying instead of writing a 7 paragraph rant.
Gavintheterrible2 this is what studying is for, to use the knowledge for good, may that be to correct someone or to add more to someone else’s knowledge.
THANKS, A LOT, BROTHER FOR YOUR EXPLANATIONS
Whenever I try to simply explain Islamic succession to Muhammad, this is the easiest way;
Caliphate (Sunni): meritocratic and elected
Imamate (Shiite): arostocraric and inherited.
@Swapn Lok authoritative or authoritarian?
So a Sultanate is a Imamate for Sunni Muslims?
One thing I don't quite understand, why is the Muslim world seem to remain so obsessed with this political division of an empire that have ceased to exist for centuries?
@@abram3283 Frankly, I do not think I, nor my fellow Muslims know.
@@abram3283 It's not about succession anymore. It has become two fully divided sects with different theologies and practices.
Narrated Ibn `Abbas:
While I was standing amongst the people who were invoking Allah for `Umar bin Al-Khattab who was lying (dead) on his bed, a man behind me rested his elbows on my shoulder and said, "(O `Umar!) May Allah bestow His Mercy on you. I always hoped that Allah will keep you with your two companions, for I often heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, "I, Abu Bakr and `Umar were (somewhere). I, Abu Bakr and `Umar did (something). I, Abu Bakr and `Umar set out.' So I hoped that Allah will keep you with both of them." I turned back to see that the speaker was `Ali bin Abi Talib.
Sahih al-Bukhari 3677
In-book : Book 62, Hadith 27
Many many mistakes, the biggest one of them is saying that Mu'aya had said that Ali was responsible for Othman death which is not true Mu'aya wanted to take revenge from who killed Othman immediately but Ali saw that the situations at that time were not suitable to take revenge so the conflict isn't about authority nor even revenge for Othman but it was about time of revenge.
It’s just a theory. Also, Muawiyah said that he wanted revenge for Uthman’s murder in his aggressive Anti Ali campaign. Guess you fell for it too.
@@jordanianchristian8387 Muawiyah is famous in Levant/Syria today Syria, Jordan, Palestine and Lebanon, Umayyad because Muawiyah married with Ghassanid Arabs Christian women. and Muawiyah. while in Iraq Ali more famous. Both Iraq and Syria hate each other because of War between Eastern Roman and Vassal Ghassanid, Lakmids arab under Vassal of Persian in Iraq, they fight eachother. many family died and want to take revenage. it was a mess. Syrian army beheaded Hussien because one of reason he want to rebel.
@@safuwanfauzi5014 So that's why the Levant is suffering so much...it's because they supported the enemies of ahlubayt.
Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala said:
إِنَّمَا الْمُؤْمِنُونَ إِخْوَةٌ فَأَصْلِحُوا بَيْنَ أَخَوَيْكُمْ ۚ وَاتَّقُوا اللَّهَ لَعَلَّكُمْ تُرْحَمُونَ
"The believers are but brothers, so make settlement between your brothers. And fear Allah that you may receive mercy."
(QS. Al-Hujuraat 49: Verse 10)
Narrated Al-Hasan Al-Basri:
When Al-Hasan bin `Ali moved with army units against Muawiya, `Amr bin AL-As said to Muawiya, "I see an army that will not retreat unless and until the opposing army retreats." Muawiya said, "(If the Muslims are killed) who will look after their children?" `Amr bin Al-As said: I (will look after them). On that, `Abdullah bin 'Amir and `Abdur-Rahman bin Samura said, "Let us meet Muawaiya and suggest peace." Al-Hasan Al-Basri added: No doubt, I heard that Abu Bakra said, "Once while the Prophet was addressing (the people), Al-Hasan (bin `Ali) came and the Prophet (ﷺ) said, 'This son of mine is a chief, and Allah may make peace between two groups of Muslims through him."
Sahih al-Bukhari 7109
In-book : Book 92, Hadith 56
@@zxera9702 the enemy of AhlulBayt is Shia not Sunnis
Why are there so many sunnis hating this video? I don't see shias hating all other history videos that present the rashidun caliphate in a sunni narrative. Makes you wonder which school of thought is on the right path...
Aren't you a follower of prophet Muhammad pbuh
He is taking his name in a disrespectful way and put an image
And he is faking the story
Brother we r muslim not shia sunni
I seriously think you should consider re-doing this video using more reliable sources. A lot of the Sunni/Shia sources that are written at least 150 after the Prophet have a lot of pro/anti-Sunni/Shia bias, so unless you're a trained historian you shouldn't just regurgitate "facts" written mostly +200 years after the fact.
huh?
@@williamrobert9898 This guy reads late shia undocumented no prove whatsoever made up stories. This is bs. The Ridda wars are far more complicated than that. Also they are based on Taxes most importantly Zakat (which is one of 5 pilers of Islam. The rich didn't want to do it. But as it is a piler it is a sin that brakes your Islam. They didn'twant to pay it 2.5% of weath for ever and change Islam teachings. Also there is other layers too.)
Abu Baker didn't name he suggested. Omar was elected , chosen by the many leaders amongst them.
Also, it is not unless they are monastic. Non-Muslim are non-muslims lol.
Alie didn't kill them because they had amongst them important people from Syria, Egypt and Iraq and some travle leaders sons. Thus killing them might make a really big problem.
At sametime Alie was assassinated Muawa was also attacked with an assassination attempt but it failed.
Khargate where against both sides in an extreme way. Also vast majority of them are new Muslims from Mesopotamia/Iraq.
There was a forth party of Persian nobles in the background.
If only there was an unbiased history...
it's very hard to find though
You should see his stuff on israel... Dude goes out of his way to "debunk" shit completely "unbiased." I hate this dude's channel. Selective processing at it's best.
Rashidun caliphate is more badass compared to other caliphate
Looks like Ali is the only guy who wanted to maintain peace and avoiding civil war, he was Muhammad's cousin, brother, son in law, and legitimate heir
whoever I was his Mulla then Ali is His Mulla. The Propt Muhammad( Be peace upon him) Say.
Are you shia
Stop spreading confusion purposly. The Companions NEVER competed with each other. That's Shia Rafidah perverted stories.
Exactly
Exactly
Stopped watching at 4:36 , this was taken from a shia extremist oral tradition. Not even well known shia historians record this.
Sure, Read Youre كتب الحديث الستة, Especially صحيح البخاري.
ALMUIZ FATIMI fuck off shias are the best
A small disagreement you stopped watching lol. How closes minded can you be
闇冬 to us it’s not that small. One of the 4 khalifahs. If Ali wasn’t disappointed about the rulers than why are we nearly 1400 years later.
Hamdaan Chalky how do you know he wasn’t because your told he wasn’t ?
It's hard not to believe this guy is not shia 🤣
U mean the one who says right things is shia that is why your whole sect is lie
@@samreenfatima6592 your existense is a lie
@@SHAHZAIBKHAN-me9sw apne me hi khush raho pta krlo kisise bhi ki ali as ka haal khilafat me kaisa tha jake sahih bukhari me padho ki kisne fatima ka ghar jalaya fir samajh ayega who is liar
@@samreenfatima6592 being a sunni isn't being in a sect, the sunnis are orthodox muslims. the only reason that it has a name is to differentiate from the sects and show that we abide by the Quran and Sunnah
@@mansa8354 who said to you that you are orthodox muslim go and see who started the wahabism it was started back in 1700 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Thank you for fairly presenting the Shia side as well as the Sunni one. Usually the Shia narrative is instantly dismissed in favour of the Sunni one. This was very balanced. We need more historians like you!
Balanced!!
It was a mess
@@napolien1310 The only reason you say that is because the Shia narrative was given the time of day that it usually never gets. Balanced for you would be excluding it completely
Because your narrative is borderline insane 😂
Listen from Ali radiallahu anhu
Narrated Ibn `Abbas:
While I was standing amongst the people who were invoking Allah for `Umar bin Al-Khattab who was lying (dead) on his bed, a man behind me rested his elbows on my shoulder and said, "(O `Umar!) May Allah bestow His Mercy on you. I always hoped that Allah will keep you with your two companions, for I often heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, "I, Abu Bakr and `Umar were (somewhere). I, Abu Bakr and `Umar did (something). I, Abu Bakr and `Umar set out.' So I hoped that Allah will keep you with both of them." I turned back to see that the speaker was `Ali bin Abi Talib.
Sahih al-Bukhari 3677
In-book : Book 62, Hadith 27
Alis death wasn’t the end of the Rashidun Caliphate Alis son Hasan rueld after the death of his father.
Umar❤ is the most famous leader in history no mother will gave birth one like him
No my mother gave birth.
You're wrong. It’s prophet Muhammad (SW)
Ali (as) is great not your umar. Tell me Where was your umar. In the battle of khyber? Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) called Ali (as) every sahaba called Ali as their Maula. he is the lion of Allah. The strongest warrior.
ooo sister forget it. we should not fight for this. respect all. Ali(pbuh)&umar(pbuh) foth was friend of each other. unity is straight 💜💜💜
@@aminaislam3050 No sis I am not fighting he said no mother can give birth to person like hazrat umar. By saying this he is indirectly insulting Hazrat Muhammad (sawa) and Imam Ali (as). Hazrat Muhammad (as) is best creation of Almighty Allah. And Imam Ali (as) is strongest warrior. He has a title called Haider e karrar. He is lion of Allah. These people insult prophet's parents by saying they are in hell. They call prophet's mother as kaafira (Nauzubillah) and he is praising Hazrat umars mother. such a hypocrate.
Abu Bakr is without a doubt the best Caliph in history, I'd go further and say that he's a slightly better politician than The prophet himself.
He petrified Arabia into unification, then made the wise decision of making Khalid the main army general, he saw the cracks in the Persian and Byzantine empires and attacked them out if the blue opening the floodgates for Islamic conquests.
If Abu Bakr lived 5 more years, Islam would be the main religion of Europe.
Why did you put a image of prophet Muhammad pbuh
That's actually not his image but then also it is bad
we appreciated your hard work to make vedio on Rashidun khalifat ,I would like to say 90% of your description wrong so for your further vedio’s please use the adequate reference of islamic books.
you are doing good & bad at the same time.Your speach provoke the conflict between Muslim Ummah.Thanks
There’s some wrong info in here!
In comments I have never seen a muslim disrespect any other person or religion
But others come in the Islamic video they disrespect in the comment, disrespect islam and prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and when we defend ourselves they said your religion is wrong and taught to disrespect.
🤣🤣🤣
Dont uploaded picture on cover of video
The Islamic conquests in many ways ended Antiquity and were the start of the Medieval period. The worlds two long-standing powers, Rome and Iran were both defeated by previously unremarkable desert tribes. Rome was reduced to a fraction of its former self while Iran was destroyed and remade in the image of the new masters of the world.
Your narrative is taken from shia sources, this is not true at all, there was no hatred towards Ali from any of the companions or wives of prophet Mohammad
Haha 😂 you serious? read your own hadees u will come to know. how many sahabas waged war against Imam Ali (as)
Muhammad, peace be upon him, did not give Hashemites control over the Kaaba, he gave it to Abd-al-Dar ibn Qusai Cousins of the Hashemites
All the clapback by pissed-off Sunnis is great...just what I came here to read. 🍿
LOL same
Bro change the thumbnail!
I love the completely unbiased opinions of this video claiming it's false and bad simply because of the sunni/Shia divide.
Any specialist in Islamic history would say the same things about this video. I went to the University of Chicago and specialized in Islamic history, there are major problems with this video. These are valid concerns. Any professor of Islamic history would raise the same concerns.
We were taught that the question of leadership immediately after the death of Mohammad, was settled by cultural custom: leadership was settled upon by a pre-Islamic custom of election of the oldest member. Abu Bakr was the oldest tribal leader, hence, the majority settled leadership on him, even though Mohammad had said that Ali and his descendants, Mohammad's grandchildren, were chosen.
truly ?
What is there, do you realize that the Arabs choose the eldest as a general ruler, and what is your source about choosing Ali as caliph?
the PROPHITE Mohamed peace be upon him
Abu Bakr was appointed as an imam for Muslims at the time of prayer, a period before his death, may God bless him and grant him peace, and this is a clear harm
The story is partly bs and has a lot of Shia fake history mixed in it.
For more details scroll down to the comment of skilled son of adam he breaks it down well...anyone who read seera would realise the many mistakes.
@Joe Smoe thanks
Hush abdool
Whose picture have you uploaded on the cover of video.
this why is why never learn islamic historical from non-muslim
What were the nations/tribes before islam was born?
Watch his previous videos, but, in a nutshell, there were various tribes that mainly followed traditional polytheistic pantheons, as well as various Jewish tribes in the Penensula and the Christian Kingdom of Axum, which ruled Yemen for a time
Ghasasinids in the levant
Some were firebenders but a majority were water, earth and airbenders. More you know.
The Himyarite kingdom in southern Arabia was one, but if memory serves it didn't last three centuries.
all that is wrong omar loved ali more than anyone he was like his brother and ali was never forced to submit but he agreed that abubakr will be the first caliph
@Out lander yup trust me brother the history of islam is the best
Yes He was.
Narrated Ibn `Abbas:
While I was standing amongst the people who were invoking Allah for `Umar bin Al-Khattab who was lying (dead) on his bed, a man behind me rested his elbows on my shoulder and said, "(O `Umar!) May Allah bestow His Mercy on you. I always hoped that Allah will keep you with your two companions, for I often heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, "I, Abu Bakr and `Umar were (somewhere). I, Abu Bakr and `Umar did (something). I, Abu Bakr and `Umar set out.' So I hoped that Allah will keep you with both of them." I turned back to see that the speaker was `Ali bin Abi Talib.
Sahih al-Bukhari 3677
In-book : Book 62, Hadith 27
The abdools are so mad 😂😂
Can you please remove the picture of Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم?
The picture is of Ali.
It's not the prophet picture the prophet has no pictures and any picture drawn is rejected, it's not allowed.
Casual Historian You cannot draw any pictures of any prophet it is forbidden in Islam
@@haruncelebi5115 yeh but Ali isn't a prophet? Why are some of you so religious yet so stupid. Thought Allah was all about education, no?
@@Fixided drawing Prophet Muhammad is not allowed. Any of the prophets actually because they might be worshipped
You need to actually read up on the arabic side of the story.. The english version of events is distorted and sometimes flat out wrong and from my abysmal memory I can point out sone mistakes.. However the one that bothered me the most was the Mohammed gave his tribe control of the kaaba.. Wrong.. He gave it to the tribe that had cared for the kaaba since before he was a prophet and that tribe still controls it to this day and that tribe was not his own "bani hashem / hashemites", can't remember their name though.. They're famous though.. Shouldn't be hard to find.. But you need to go through the older arabic books for more accurate information.. Old arabic prints are getting harder and harder to find and command ridiculous prices for their value.. As they are far more trustworthy.
alot of what you said is not correct
i think youv took this form shia stories that most of it is not correct
How so?
@@xmfr7578 "Religion of peace"
Maybe you should really reconsider your thumbnail and I am really offended. And maybe there are some people who could do some serious things to you.
Hey dude, I am a Muslim and I believe that you had done a VERY WRONG thing. (not sayin in a mad way, just mentioning.)
To address the Shia-Sunni thing: almost all of both sects agree with the idea that images of Muhammad and the prophets should not be produced. There might be some small, random minority cult that thinks its okay, but it would not be part of either Shia or Sunni ideology.
Muslims also do not approve of images of Jesus, Moses and Abraham (I don't really see images of Abraham). However, as we are required to be tolerant of other religions, and other religions feel the need to worship Jesus or create images of Moses, it is not our right to protest these or ban them. Since images of Muhammad are not made for religious needs, and images of Muhammad are not allowed by Islam, we can protest them. Non-Muslims are making images of Muhammad all the time that are not protested by Muslims, because non-Muslims can do whatever they want. It is when Muhammad is being insulted that Muslims peacefully protest against it (here I will add before anyone ignorant enough cleverly mentions: the radicalized murderers do not deserve to lumped in with the general "Muslims" even though they think they do).
Additionally, images of Jesus, Moses, Abraham etc are banned by Muslims for other Muslims to produce. (For example, churches in Pakistan have statues of Jesus, but the state would never approve of a Muslim-made movie portraying Jesus).
No he was the first boy to accept Islam.abu bakr was the man to accept islam.hazrat ali was named karamolla waziraha by prophet.sheikh Mohammed bin zine was the custodian of khaaba after uthman bin talha they were not from hashim tribe.
Why are you taking so much from the Shia sources when Sunnis are the VAST majority? Wallahi theres so much bullshit i cant even finish this vid.
Other youtubers at least try to remain neutral and present both versions.
The Arabic words are grossly mispronounced and أبو طالب was not connected in your diagram, nor الخوارج. However, much of your narrative many specialists in Islamic history would agree with. Much of your narrative about the Succession of the Rashidun Caliphate is mere speculation and hotly debated. Its far from being that simple. The Ridda wars had nothing to do with tribes breaking away from Abu Bakr per se, but rather with their unwillingness to pay tax (zakah) to the new Islamic polity. They denied a religious obligation ordained in Quran, therefore they were apostates. Its also hotly debated as to why the Islamic conquests were so successful, some cite recent urban plagues, some cite wars of attrition between the Byzantines and Sassanids, whereas Christian sectarianism was of little concern to most historians. There was really no division of the Caliphate between 'Ali and Mu'awiyyah, it was essentially Mu'awiyyah who held all practical power. Your video comes across as very biased leaning towards Orientalist-Revisionist and Shi'i historiographies.
He is quoting all the spicy stuff most from shia refrences 👍
bro Where do you get your information about Aisha and Ali from?
I am a Sunni Muslim who is deeply in-depth with the Sunni and Shia sources for these events, and I have not heard of such stories.
You have much research to do. Try again.
Do you know of an accurate source for information about this on RUclips? I've read books, but I'd like to see some good, historical videos.
Warning!
Triggered Abdools & Moohammeds below.
Scroll down with caution.
because this video is not reliable
@@jnvrsoc8967 yes it is
@@SKM_KB i didnt watch it but when i read the comments I see most of them are saying this guy use weak or shia sources so everything thats shia is not reliable
@@jnvrsoc8967 everything that's sunni is not reliable
Hey you 😑..The man in the pic is not the prophet muhammad ...and this is haram in islam ok
You dare not post any photo of the prophet in the thumbnail or in your videos.
Don't do this again.
Many many mistakes, this guy mixed many unauthentic things and Mixed Shia and Sunni view also
this comment section is funny:
-following muh narratives=truth
-not following muh narratives=false
jeez how closed minded they're.
for real lol
What a bogus fairytale, it’s not a Judaic Religion where every person is jealous of others or here and there some family dramas as perpetuated in the Biblical stories, Islam is far far removed from such fairytales, all the Prophet’s wives and family members are highly regarded in Islam, earning them the title of Mother of the Believers, Just as All the Biblical prophets who are depicted as sinner in the Bible are highly regarded and elevated their mention in Islam. So don’t try to demean our heroic figures and personalities.
Shiiah sources are lies. If you study the year right after prophit Mohammed death. You will realise he was the best fit to be the first khalif
Abdool stop it
This succession crisis kind of shows you how Muhammad only cared about his own power , not the fate of his "religion" .
How? Muhammad supported democracy.
When donkeys talk
@@tasinal-hassan8268
How ? .He literally murdered everyone who criticize him .Even single mothers with their children at their feet .Even old men .
@@Vllili
One did: he created the Quran
@@oolooo Those were not criticisms. Blasphemy is different from that. They blasphemed him by making fun of his women, heritage, and incited war against him. Muhammad wanted to be a pacifist at first, but he was living in a region where you can't win against tyranny without resorting to violence. Any sane and righteous man would've gone to war against the pagans.
If war booty and power were his goal, he would've had that ages ago. His own enemies offered him wealth, women, and power in exchange for him leaving Islam. They were actually shocked when it was found out that he refused to accept their offers. Whatever he acquired through war/conquests is way less than that what was offered to him before he declined them.
So that shows that he had no desire for power for the sake of power.
Notice how the guy shivers everytime he moved his hands?
you are telling lies, please go and get the truth.
The project never said her read the most perfect of God’s messengers, the Quran clearly states that there is no difference amongst god messengers or cute little edit should be removed.
While there were battles that weakened the regions that were conquered everyone conveniently forgets that the stands were at a perpetual state of war themselves for centuries right before the prophet there was a 40 year long war called harb albassus and the Arabs never faced large armies and were never equipped equally as they were, and lacking general man power. The reason for the war should also be stated as initially between client Arab kingdoms of Byzantine and Sassanids stacked the Arabs first the lakhmids and their rivals.
Ayesha was possibly forced into the battle of the camel against her will, being detained by ibn al zubayr and others and having no more leadership role, more is a symbolic one. Abu lulua was a Christian, him being in the capital is a great mystery because Omar specifically banned all foreigners from being there for security, he was possibly an umayyad agent, Umayyads being the ruling elite clan of the quraysh before Islam lends credence to this and their ascension.
Marawan was the one responsible for writing the letter, Ali was also from quraysh. The Hashemites weren’t appointed by the prophets for the kaaba, they already were the keepers of the kaaba and simply remained that way. Ali wasn’t weakened by the camel, he was forced into arbitration by the kharijites in his own army when muawiyas soldiers put Quran at the end of their Spears. There’s no argument against Othman coming the Quran, it’s well attested for by carbon dating.
This guy is just quoting history from shia sources. Man please do some research.
I apologize but this is largely inaccurate and very much mistaken on many of instances that are too numerous to name all but I shall name a few.
The contention of the succession to Muhammad was only challenged by the Ansar of Medina who saw that the caliph should be one of them and they elected Saad ibn Ubada. The meccans who were represented by Abu Bakir, Umar and Abu Ubaida disagreed and saw that caliph should be one of them as they held a stronger position with the rest of the Arabs and that this would be the smoothest transition of power and that this would the right way to maintain stability. The people of Medina agreed and so what was left was to decide who of the Meccans would rule. Abu Bakir nominated both Umar and Abu Ubaida and told the Ansar to choose one but Umar and Abu Ubaida disagreed and thought that Abu Bakir was best qualified (owing to a number of clear reasons that require a few paragraphs to fully explain) and so it was that the Ansar pledged allegiance to Abu Bakir and the rest of people whom were not present did the following day. Now we ask where was Ali during all of this? He was busy preparing for the prophets funeral so he was not present during the talks on who should be caliph. It was also noted that Ali was late in pledging allegiance to Abu Bakir when he was asked why by Abu Bakir he said that he was upset that the discussions happened without him having a say if and that it wasn’t because he wished to be caliph. The idea that there was any hatred between these two men is laughable. This is also shown clearly during Umar accession to caliph in which some were upset that Umar had been chosen because he was known to be strict and some feared he maybe to strict to lead. Ali defended Umar saying “I have often heard the prophet say that he was in the company of Abu Bakir and Umar or that he had been out with Abu Bakir and Umar, these two men were his closest friends” this clearly means that he viewed them both as worthy to rule. Not to mention that Ali named 3 of his sons after Abu Bakir Umar and Othman, why would he do that if he had hated them?
This is just one instance of a mistake in this video, it would be too long to refute it all but rest assured that much of what he said is false and has no historical evidence
You may ask for sources of individual facts which I have mentioned, I also didn’t include them all since I mentioned more than one and I didn’t know how to cite them without it being confusing.
The video is full of historical errors. Unfortunately, the sources are not reliable, regardless of whether they are Shiite or Sunni
Where did you get your source? Facebook ?
Poor Ali... Feel sorry for him
Who looted or invaded more as Islamic invaders,Shia or Sunni ?
Great video! However, I think you need to work on the pronunciation of some places and names.
Some information is wrong the wars of apostate happened because of reclaim land and the stop false prophets
Maula Ali R.A./A.S. was right successor
Dont upload fake picture of our beloved very pure HAZRAT MUHAMMAD RASULALLAH SALALLAHU ALAIHIWASALLAM as cover picture. Remove it fast.
very very wrong portrayal of history...pretty surfaced knowledge
the election of first caliph has a completely different scenario to what u hv explained
Bro is telling the story from an almost purely shia perspective and presenting it as history.. the majority of the stories he began with had weak broken sources compared to the other more credible tellings of the events
I studied this history. You depended on sources which have had problems with Abu Bkr, Othman, Aisha. These sources actually say that they're non-Muslims. Or perhaps you depended on sources which depended on those sources.
So I appreciate that you discuss your sources in one of your videos.
Sources
Sources
the story of Umar atacked Fatima pace be upon her is not true totally lie
It is true.
@@tarikb712 Please cite some source...
@@salmanmasud918 it's 100% true and even prooven from sunni books umar burnt house of my bibi Fatimah (as). Shehzadi e Rasool 😢
@@alishahussain2108
THE TRUTH IS ALI KILLED. THOUSANDS IN THE BATTLE OF JAMAL
THE TRUTH SUCCESOR TO MOHAMMED WAS HIS ADOPTED SON
what the hell is going on???
Fake video
90% of your sources are Shia…
Was thinking the same thing. As if shias funded this video for their propaganda
You got some wrong informations
Please remove picture of prophet Muhammad peace be upon him from the background of video... that is haram in Islam ☪️
This is ali not muhamad
@erick meyer No,that's Ali.
Police be upon muhammed
🤦🤦 which link did you clicked
Clearly this guy knows what he’s talking about well done 👍
Hi, I am referring to this video for my History project. Can someone point out the mistakes here and mention a reliable source instead as several people here seem believe that the story's incorrect?
hi, you projekt is probably over but i can still tell you that there are pretty much no reliable sources. the koran doesn't mention any of the companions of Muhammed. only the hadiths do. and they were written long after all of them died. you can only look up the facts that both shia and suni agree on. or at least don't strongly oppose.
@@urdunibnpeter7276 Oh, thank you so much. My project is done but I like to do research on stuff like this.
The comments of peace.
This sayes Islam is Real relegion
Shia propaganda
I can just tell this man is a christian. He heavily favors rafidi narrations. Pagans strong together
*It's Madinah Not Yathrib*
This video is so blatantly anti islam
unserious
Do not ever attempt to depict prophet Muhammad pbuh ever. Delete that thumbnail immediatly as you will offened many of us muslims
That's not Muhammad in the Thumbnail. It's Ali.
@@CasualHistorian Thank god you did not depicit the prophet. By the way i love your videos im a new subscriber
All of it wrong.... Ali and abu baker don't hate each others
So many mistakes in this
Just like the Quran
But bro why are you dancing
his telling fals story of islam and creating confusion trap for the viewers.
each of them were assassinated
Who would win: Two of the mightiest empires of all time
Some bible fanfic
@Pecu Alex last time I checked it was the Ottoman empire who beat the crusaders, not the other way around 🤣
Did you even read the Sunni view of succession either all your patrons are Shia or their is something else. Not impressed by this video😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠
Your sources are very weak and biased towards much later written Shia lore. A lot of what you say and pass as facts attributed and a consensus in Muslim sources accepted by only 10% which are Shia, is rejected by 90 which are Sunni. And when examined by scientific historic method is less reliable than many other sources that contradict these stories.
Approach this with more science and with an agnostic mindset instead of doing the leftist thing and taking the stories of whom you deem as the underdog. This really affects your credibility.
This is a fantasy picture of some fake person on thumbnail
Sir Kant god I hope so
*The guy on the thumbnail looks like Ali(RA) but not in real life , in Umar Ibn Al Khatabs movie, you can watch it*
Utter falsehood umar didn't do that.ali willingly agreed to abu bakr caliphate
Are you jewish?
no Abubakr radiallahu anhu was the first male convert
Imam Ali was the first male convert
actually it was ali, even sunni sources agree that ali was the first male convert. however they try to degrade his status by saying that ali was the first young MAN and that abu bakr was the first MAN. but by gender, they agree that ali was the first MALE.
buzz lightyear I’m pretty sure Ali was born Muslim. He was born in the kaaba
buzz lightyear Khadijah was the first women to convert to Islam