@@rolanddiaz1974 I guess 'top speed' is how you/them define it. The book may say 128-135 or whatever, but realalistically when are you EVER going to achieve that? Unless you're on track and that's NOT what this bike is about. I'm much more interested in 0-60 figures. And being a lightweight, small framed bike I would think the acceleration is more than enough. (As reference, I commute to work on a Triumph 660. The fastest I've been on it is just over 80mph on a motorway. On twisty A roads it'll do 60-70 around corners. More than fast enough). Manufacturers 'claimed' top speed is rather irrelevant in the real world.
@@Corky341 it's not about how you do top speed thru your hands, it's the motorcycle machine that brings higher HP, if your bike is slower, low top speed, and low performance waist of money, that's y we need motorcycle for better top speed
vibes?
How much top speed?
Kawasaki doesn’t list a top speed in the specs but there is plenty of power still at your fingertips at the speed limit :)
@@TeamMotoMotorcycles so u mean kawasaki are low top speed?
@@rolanddiaz1974 I guess 'top speed' is how you/them define it. The book may say 128-135 or whatever, but realalistically when are you EVER going to achieve that? Unless you're on track and that's NOT what this bike is about. I'm much more interested in 0-60 figures. And being a lightweight, small framed bike I would think the acceleration is more than enough. (As reference, I commute to work on a Triumph 660. The fastest I've been on it is just over 80mph on a motorway. On twisty A roads it'll do 60-70 around corners. More than fast enough). Manufacturers 'claimed' top speed is rather irrelevant in the real world.
@@Corky341 it's not about how you do top speed thru your hands, it's the motorcycle machine that brings higher HP, if your bike is slower, low top speed, and low performance waist of money, that's y we need motorcycle for better top speed
damn fucking low iq comment hurts my brain
Entendi tudo que ele falou .