Nothing on RUclips hypes me up more than a new Episode of Universal History. I hope these gents keep up the amazing work. I wish Rohlin would do a podcast using his incredible encyclopedic knowledge, or at least write us some books lol
I think the moral of the story of Grendel's Mother falling to the Giant sword is that evil will unwittingly forge and offer to you the very weapon you will need to destroy it.
Thanks for this interesting discussion! I read Beowulf as an undergraduate in my 20s (back in the mid-1980s). The professor raised many of the issues brought up here and I believe he came at his interpretation from a Christian perspective. I remember a main theme he developed was how the further away from his community Beowulf got, the more he became like a monster himself. Something like that. It's been a while. We also read Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, which has become a favorite of mine. I read it again a couple years ago and was more surprised this time around by the mixture of Christian and Pagan themes than I was when I first read it. Your discussion has prompted me to dig out the newer translation of Beowulf that my son read in college and revisit the text.
Wonderful video as always!! Reminds me of this passage from the Zohar: "There was a certain male who came into the world from the spirit of the side of Cain, and they called him Tubal-cain. And a certain female emerged with him, and human beings go astray after her, and she was called Naamah... And Naamah makes a roaring noise and cleaves to her side, and she still survives. And her dwelling is among the breakers of the great sea, and she goes out and makes sport with men, warming herself on them in dreams with human desire, and cleaving to them... The sons that she bears from mortal men present themselves to the females among mankind and they become pregnant by them and bear spirits. And they all go to ancient Lilith and she rears them."
“Reversing Hermon” by Michael Heiser had a shocking number of parallels to this discussion. If you have not read him yet, you absolutely should. He was a world-class biblical scholar, irrespective of the stream of Christianity one finds themself in. After hearing your deep dive into Beowulf, you have me convinced of the original poet’s intent.
Yeah, it's a bit sad how long does it take for these things to penetrate. I was hoping for some discussion between them while Michael was still alive. Many are set in tradition and will not go about reading from protestant scholar. For anyone interested he hosted naked bible podcast that is freely available. If you're into woo-woo fringepop321 was his outlet as well and questions allowed might be worth checking out. For starters search for Heiser logos documentary here on RUclips.
It all fits together, doesn't it?😊 Genesis is real history and we are all far closer to it then we can really realize (we are more affected by modernism and the evolution narrative than we realize, even if you don't believe it.)
If you're new to Heiser, the book to start with is The Unseen Realm. Heiser's work has a lot in common with that of Fr Stephen DeYoung, of the Lord of Spirits podcast.
@@arimathean4128 Thanks. I have read “Unseen Realm”, along with “Demons” and most of “Angels”. I do think you are right that “Unseen Realm” is probably the better starting work as it lays out the case in a gentler fashion for people who have never been exposed to this type of worldview. But “Reversing Hermon” is the more topical for the above discussion, and, in my opinion, an even more interesting read. But both are fantastic.
Hard to universalise this one, chaps, look forward to it! People may enjoy this analysis vid as a supplement: "№17 Beowulf's Bane | Anglo-Saxon origins & the eternal evils" Audience comment: "My god it was great, really set my mind alive. Haven't felt like this since peterson started the bible lectures."
In this series they do seem to celebrate both the culturally particular aspects of things as well as the way that they participate in a more universal Christian pattern. I know that's what they named this series, but do you actually think they over-emphasize the universal nature of the subjects they discuss?
@@maximosmagyar9653 a little, yes, in a negation of the particular. Even implicitly. But i'm glad it all exists. I mentioned in our dialogue that people are allergic to saying 'Anglo-Saxon' and Pageau has hosted two talks with Roland around the subject, so i'm glad for that-people need to be comfortable saying the word.
My teacher made me read Beowulf in 7th grade. It was a short book. But I remember it kind of baffling me in a way that inspired a deep interest in reading and writing. Definitely taking this video as a sign to read Beowulf through myself again.
Awesome! I just did a video for Christmas that touched on Grendel's similarities to the Grinch. You guys took something as "cute" as Groundhog Day and revealed its cosmic implications. I look forward to seeing what you've gleaned from something as gritty and manly as Beowulf.
To add to your discussion about giants and civilisation, see the Anglo Saxon poem "The Ruin". It describes a Roman ruin (the first cities in Britain were Roman) as the "handiwork of giants", "enta geweorc" in Old English.
Also see the Gnomic Verses: Cyning sceal rīce healdan. Ceastre bēoð feorran gesyne, *Orðanc enta geweorc, Þā þe on þysse eorðan syndon, Wrætlic wealstā a geweorc. *Cunning work of giants, that are on this world fallen/aloof/sundered
I loved your lecture. I recently watched a Beowulf video to prepare myself so I could follow this lecture. Richard , you are so knowledgable on this subject. I love learning from both of you. In reguard to the idea of multiple gods not being Christian, this is a more modern mindset. If you have read Michael Heiser's book (Bible Scholar), The Unseen Realm, he talks a lot about the Counsel of gods in the old testament. He said the Bible must be read and understood in the context it was written. To do this you must understand the ancient mindset, which is what you and Jonathan talk about too. Michael Heiser says there is a counsel of gods in the old testament but that the Christian/Jewish God is the God above all other Gods. He also incorporates information from Enoch and other ancient literature to acurately understand the Bible. He said the NT Disciples would have had knowledge of these writings because they were commonly known at that time. He said when the the Tower of Bable was destroyed God gave some of the lesser gods authority over certain people groups and geographical areas. This could be another reason that so many stories are repeated in various cultures. He also talks about the the spirits and monsters that are a part of the full Bible story. It makes one read the Bible with more understanding. I love the idea of Universal History because I do think everything fits together and can only be fully understood by those who use God the Lord as a reference point.
Are you a Gnostic? You think "lesser" gods (you used capital G) are giving you hidden "knowledge" about our God's "true" will? Mate, those are demons. There is no "hidden" knowledge that communing with demons will give you, beyond that which will bring you (possibly eternal) harm, as it did Adam and Eve. De council of de Ganja gods tell me to breeve de bref of de lyfe fo' eternal knowledge of de Great BONG In De Sky! I breeve de Brefalyfe upon you, dat you may be healed by de great Cannabis Council! Is that an accurate summary of a "council"? I saw it in a dream so it must be real. Smoking copious amounts of crack also reveals many hidden secrets, like how to carry full size refrigerators on one arm while riding a bicycle. Is there a Council of Crack too?
Been a long time since you guys mentioned the Goths and raised way more questions than were answered on these mysterious origins. Can't wait to delve deeper
Between these conversations and the scholarship of Tom Shippey and his book Beowulf and the North Before the Vikings, we have a very full picture of this time period in history. Bravo guys. And if you haven't heard of Tom's book... Highly recommend! Both of you should get together and compare notes. Your work very much compliments each other! ❤
point of clarification: @26m57s, the worst of the four sorts of betrayal in the final circle of Dante’s Inferno is betrayal of *benefactors*. betrayal of i. kin, ii. nations, iii. guests, and iv. *benefactors*, in that ascending order. Generally good otherwise. 🤙🏻
Richard, if you want to build some hype for your RPG, some videos about how you designed the setting and rules / game design would be super interesting
I feel like I'm REALLY late to the party. I've seen you countless times on interviews with Jordan Peterson but for some reason never bothered to check if you had a youtube channel. Well, good news for me, now I have a backlog to catch up on. : D
The Saxons were Christians. Some of the Norse tribes were Christians, but a few were still pagan. Mostly holdovers from the Roman pagan period, rather than ancient Norse gods, though there were still those too. Christianity seems to have spread faster and more traditionally Orthodox in more Western places, like England and France than in Italy. By the 600s AD, Christianity was firmly entrenched in the East and West.
My grandmother told me Beowulf was a story of Pagan/Christian conflict. Grendel, his mother represented the ancient pagan gods ir remainder of Nephlim, demanding terrible sacrifices, the dragon lurking evil or Satan. The hero from the North was a saviour, not Christ but perhaps a saint? Can't recall the detail but I loved this podcast.
In one of my other interests, folklore, anything that 19th Century antiquarians, folklore collectors and, especially in the case of Scotland, CoS Moderators didn't recognise from scripture was catalogued under "Pagan Hold over" However subsequent research has shown pretty much every one of them developed within a Christian Context and often quite far into the middle ages. Some even date to around the time of the Reformation or even later! The British Folklore Society were ahead of the curve for a long time. In the mid 20th century they ran regular questionnaires and found folklore developing in real time! In the 1930s they found all kinds of superstitions around things that were unlucky to do on Fridays and separate superstitions around the number 13, such as it being an unlucky room number. It wasn't until the 1950s or 60s that the two came together. But if you ask you'll hear people projecting it back into history, usually to the Knights Templar. A really good book to look at is Prof Ronald Hutton's book "Stations of the Sun", which is a history of the Ritual Calendar Year in Britain. Spoiler Alert: Halloween is thoroughly Christian!
Cool, will have to make time for this. This series and Jonathan helped me get into the Holy Fathers and Fr Rose and convert me to Orthodoxy. I don’t feel I really need all the archetypal stuff and Imaginal stuff any more, but this series, Beowulf, folklore etc are all very educational and interesting. If kept in its proper place and not mixed with the spirituality against hesychasm it’s all far better than the Gnostic/hermetic/Jungian/postmodern, consumerism, and government propaganda co-opting of myth, history, and fairy tales pumped 24/7 in entertainment, games and education. If there are issues with different paths to Orthodoxy having different baggage, be it a softer academic approach that can be soft and move against patristics ceding to the times, or conversely the young guys coming in against that being rude to priests, I do think those coming in this way need to be very careful about Theosophy, process theology, Origenism (Jonathan himself is very careful there), Jung etc and get into the liturgy with a spiritual father that doesn’t allow for those things. I know that splits with neoliberalism and conservatism via Peterson, but it also has extreme individualism not just from the Peterson side, but also the Gnostic psychedelic side, and on the side of natural/process theology the kind of stuff we saw with the Living Church and Christian esotericism Jonathan addressed in his video with Grail Country. This overlaps with things like an OCA bishop rejecting the ecumenical councils to be amenable to ecumenicism and modernity and extra-ecclesiastical power in academia, and left wing infiltration, subversion and state influence and pressure through scandal as well as through both Constantinople under the Turks and the infiltration of the Vatican. It involves taking COVID money and deplatforming Abbot Tryphon by Ancient Faith and coincides with lists of who not to listen to as well to avoid these things and has strange overlap with neocon boomer mentalities. I hope to see Jonathan address this with the more traditionalist priests like Fr Trenham, Fr Turbo, Fr Heers or Fr John Whiteford, or another discourse with Dyer. Thanks for your work Jonathan and Richard. God bless and have a productive Lent.
@@russellhoward3866 I bought both the Heany and Liuzza translations. The only Liuzza I could find was used with underlining and stupid marginal notes. (I hate marking up the texts of books. That’s why God created notebooks on day 6.5.)
funnily enough, there are some critical race "scholars" who are grendel sympathizers, and shun beowulf for being a mean mad white man. i enjoy these series immensely, keep it up!
Well, I’m not gonna use the R-word. But, I certainly understand the level of skepticism for obvious reasons. Plus, Beowulf was a monster slayer. So, there’s that😆
49:02 this reminded me of the poem the pearl (by the sir Gawaine poet) part of what the author seems to do is use images of Mary and combine them with images of the sanctified church and his daughter.
Have you come across the work The Heliand? I’m just discovering it, but it’s a translation of the Gospel written for the Germanic-Saxon people in the early centuries. The author understood that the mindset of the pagan north would be different from the Middle Eastern mind and so translated the Gospel to evangelize the Saxon people. Would be interested if this is something you’ve delved into.
Really interesting about Grendel being a decendent of Cain due to killing of kin and kin meaning fellow humans and the war of God v the giants being behind the flood also. I always thought the significance of the sword Beowulf found underwater was the tools of a place, like languages, are better used in that place, hence why his own sword failed. Why did Germanic people put hell in the north?
To the Germanic peoples, or at least the Norse ( the Norse get over-emphasized due to the lack of other surviving Germanic traditions), Hell is a place of Ice and cold, ruled by the goddesss Hel, daughter of Loki, from which the modern word " Hell" derives. Actually the place was'nt named Hell, it was Nifleheim.
Plus, he did have some cool weapons. Can’t remember the exact names. The book is a hard read. But, worth it if you’re a young impressionable male interested in warrior stories and such.
How is it Christian? Beowulfs adventures are all motivated by his want for fame, glory and material wealth. There are a few references to genesis and God as a sort of diety that controls fate, but none of Jesus christ.
Luther and Cranmer wrote homilies for the priests to read aloud, it was very common among Protestants of that time to read written homilies. The avoidance of it today is the aberration. But actually a lot of protestant pastors still do it; that is what that whole plagiarism scandal in the SBC was about
Which translation would Richard suggest (other than his own), for Beowulf? Would Tolkien’s be the best, since Tolkien is translating it from a strong traditional Catholic background?
Somewhere, I read that "EL" was what God was called around the time of Abraham, and that any name ending in "el" signifies belonging to God (Israel) or from God - but I am no scholar, and I can't recall the source material.
Yeah, it means divine and can be used to describe the most high or lesser divine beings. Old English has a similar word "Os" where names like Osgar (divine+spear) or Osric (divine+rule) come from. It's also cognate with Old Norse Æs, which you find in Æsir and Æsgard (which are both pronounced like the OE Os)
From chatGPT: Peterson and Pageau, as modern-day oracles, illuminate the path toward self-discovery, bridging the chasm between ancient wisdom and contemporary understanding. Their insights, shimmering like dewdrops on the leaves of our collective knowledge, nourish our thirst for meaning and purpose amidst the chaos of existence. 😂
I remember reading a portion of the poem at 17. I conclude the a large part of it must have been derived from early cristeon belfes. I was told that it was pigeon I think I dropped the topic but still it seems undoubtably influenced by cristanty.
Not sure. From what I understand Beowulf has similar invincibility to King Arthur. It may have something to do with him being king. Not clear on whether a sword is tied into that or not. But, essentially it’s because he was fated to be king.
All of this is so strange, makes too much sense. As does the rest of the series. I was raised Baptist, mid-west. And watching Orthodox and Catholoc teaching makes me feel like I have lived on the word of God, it was bread and water. No meat of Christ or Wine of Christ or fruit or vegetables or honey or milk. Personally I try to form stories to understand the world around me. Day dreaming for understanding, personal indulgence, escapism. Partly due to me having aspergers but I don't know were Aspergers ends and I begin. Hearing tales and stories and history here from Jon and Crew is immense to think and process and points out that all the stories I form or were given to form I have been, too much I have been selfish with or formed and played them to satisfy only carnal desires. Not to develop, to share, and to use them for constructive ends for myself and others. I'm not sure what I'm stating here, but in the least prayer that I can more properly understand legends, history, and symbolism around me or shown to me and that I don't selfishly keep my stories hidden regardless if they are competently written
That's funny. I was just wondering if they would ever touch of Hiawatha. They have done some work on North America, but mostly with traditions of the USA.
Anyone here read Headley's re-telling? What did you think? I plan to read it, but I am ready for it to be a re-telling that reflects the authour's views, and not the poem itself.
great class! two questions: what year do scholars think this story was written and of what thought concerning Beowulf was Tolkien? again very interesting talk
Hi Johnathan, I’ve been watching your videos and interactions with Dr. Peterson and others for some time, thank you for helping us understand the patterns of reality! I just watched an old video of yours, symbolic vs literal interpretation of the Bible, and I have a question which I want to comment on here because I don’t know if you would see this comment under an old video. Everything you say about intrinsic symbolic nature of reality seems true, but why is it that you cannot conclude with something straightforward such as, “I believe, as the church has always taught in its creeds and confessions, as historical fact, that there was, in 1st century Palestine, a Jewish man named Jesus from the town of Nazareth. The biblical gospels are an accurate representation of his life and teachings. On a certain day in the early 30s A.D., this historical Jesus of Nazareth was crucified in plain view of the public under the Roman authority of Pontius Pilate, and his dead body was put into a marked tomb. Yet this tomb was found to be empty on the third day after the burial. The most obvious non-supernatural explanation of this event has always been that body was stolen or misplaced somehow. Yet against all reason, his disciples began to teach that they encountered their rabbi Jesus in a resurrected form, in his same flesh and blood body, bearing the marks of his crucifixion, but somehow alive again, eating and drinking normal food with them, but that this was also a transformed and immortal body, which they saw ascend to into heaven and disappear in front of their eyes. They did not understand everything they saw and experienced, but the disciples each went to their deaths because they could not deny what they saw, and they believed they would also be raised to life one day with the same kind of immortal resurrection body which they saw with their own eyes and touched with their hands. The unbeliever will say that this was a lie or a mass hallucination, but I believe the Apostles were neither lying nor hallucinating, but rather they were witnesses to a truly unique miraculous event in the history, a one-of-a-kind one-place-one-time intersection of the divine Logos with the created order. And this event is the center of the cosmos, in which we find all meaning and purpose, through which we have hope for union with God into eternal life and joy.” Do you not affirm the historicity of the resurrection of Christ as I described? I get the sense that you do, but somehow you always skirt around the question for reasons I do not fully grasp.
I think the Poem is fairly clear that Beowulf is meant to reflect the pre-Christian Godfearers, and set him against the pagans of the North. The idea being that just because paganism was the main religion of the Germanic peoples, and the Scandinavians in particular. Still, God had a remnant of righteous Gentiles (like Cornelius from the Book of Acts). This is why, despite Beowulf clearly being a worshipper of the God of gods, the Poem never mentions Christ, or Jesus, or the Apostles, or anything else from the New Testament times. Because Beowulf is Godfearer, and one of the Righteous Gentiles.
I don't think pagans have got much to do with it. It seems that as far as the poet is concerned there are no other gods, pagans are just worshiping powers and principality that are under God. Beowulf is fighting demons and monsters, the spirits of kin-slaying and chaos.
Richards professor called the poet a "hard liner"?!? Dr. Tom Shippey?!? He's not the only one to use the phrase I suppose but I've heard him use it many times!
Sacramental imagination is this really a good way to portray understanding of the Holy Mysteries. Pageau, Rohlin, Fr Andrew Stephen Damick Kotar, and others are the new Orthodox Fantasy School. All excellent academics and I am sure very well meaning, but there is no monastic grounding. They grew up around Western fantasy as children and this along with western style academia where nothing is forbidden all guides a lot of their though. Like the Parisian School, there may be some good but there is also a lot of danger and bad. Understanding imagery of Orthodox Christian writings, stories, lessons is very good and needed in the west where much has been forgotten, the entire mystical mindset had been lost, but it needs to be viewed from a sober spiritual life. Being tantalised and enticed by imagination and mythical worlds (not Beowulf, but LOTR and others) as they discuss in other podcasts has many dangerous slopes to fall down. We do not need to “Imagine” the holy mysteries, we know! Saint John of the Ladder says imagination is of the daemons. The angels are present with The Christ in the altar and all the Temple during the liturgy . We do not need to imagine them. Also just because some ancient writers may have been Christian does not mean what they wrote was not influenced by demonic powers intended to confuse or lead people away. I just stress caution with all this renewed academic interest explaining imagery, myths, stories, fantasies and using that to view our True Faith.
The scriptures also blatantly state that the outer courts would be trampled on by the Gentiles/Pagans. So, basically illiterate morons getting ahold of sacred info and mutilating it to their own interpretation.
Yes! I came in through this way via Jordan Peterson/Jung/Vervaeke and Pageau, and am very grateful for that but there are going to be many who do not understand this and want to mix the intermediary realm into Orthodoxy via Jungianism and Theosophy. It’s wrong and dangerous and should be addressed with caveats every time they talk. There is good and interesting history here and a place for fairy tales and psychology outside and below the faith, but much of this was and is used for subversion and against Christianity from the Renaissance to German criticism, new age, masonry and illumanism, Hollywood, academia and post modernism. We should be very careful not to rebuild Orthodoxy on that. Pageau has been pretty good about caveats there and church closings, as well as accepting the councils rejection of Origen, but there are some danger zones along with Damick and the de platforming of Abbot Tryphon. It is typically in these open minded circles that Origenism, David Bentley Hart, Sophiology etc intellectualize the faith and cede ground to leftism and globalism (if other routes lead to phylotism and young men being rude to priests that is a separate issue.) I know there are other factors as well such as scandals (which there were in The Lives of The Saints or Herod as a puppet for the Romans, and Paul’s epistles), to the geopolitical pressure on Constantinople since WWI, but these things have to be addressed.
It's possible that the flood didn't wipe out all the Giants, but greatly reduced thier food supply such that they starved but humans didn't, and the remaining Ginats were taken care of by the humans slowly over time.
Nothing on RUclips hypes me up more than a new Episode of Universal History. I hope these gents keep up the amazing work. I wish Rohlin would do a podcast using his incredible encyclopedic knowledge, or at least write us some books lol
This
True.
As a Catholic, this series deepens my moral imagination and reminds me why I became Christian in the first place. Thank y’all!
The Universal History series would make an epic topic for a documentary series. It always inspires me to buy more obscure books 😅
I think the moral of the story of Grendel's Mother falling to the Giant sword is that evil will unwittingly forge and offer to you the very weapon you will need to destroy it.
The One ring comes to mind
@@NaturalStateWingChun Indeed it was almost but not quite a verbatum quote of Tolkien's.
Thanks for this interesting discussion! I read Beowulf as an undergraduate in my 20s (back in the mid-1980s). The professor raised many of the issues brought up here and I believe he came at his interpretation from a Christian perspective. I remember a main theme he developed was how the further away from his community Beowulf got, the more he became like a monster himself. Something like that. It's been a while. We also read Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, which has become a favorite of mine. I read it again a couple years ago and was more surprised this time around by the mixture of Christian and Pagan themes than I was when I first read it. Your discussion has prompted me to dig out the newer translation of Beowulf that my son read in college and revisit the text.
Wonderful video as always!! Reminds me of this passage from the Zohar:
"There was a certain male who came into the world from the spirit of the side of Cain, and they called him Tubal-cain. And a certain female emerged with him, and human beings go astray after her, and she was called Naamah... And Naamah makes a roaring noise and cleaves to her side, and she still survives. And her dwelling is among the breakers of the great sea, and she goes out and makes sport with men, warming herself on them in dreams with human desire, and cleaving to them... The sons that she bears from mortal men present themselves to the females among mankind and they become pregnant by them and bear spirits. And they all go to ancient Lilith and she rears them."
Y'all need to focus on this podcast more it's probably the best work out there
“Reversing Hermon” by Michael Heiser had a shocking number of parallels to this discussion. If you have not read him yet, you absolutely should. He was a world-class biblical scholar, irrespective of the stream of Christianity one finds themself in.
After hearing your deep dive into Beowulf, you have me convinced of the original poet’s intent.
Yeah, it's a bit sad how long does it take for these things to penetrate. I was hoping for some discussion between them while Michael was still alive.
Many are set in tradition and will not go about reading from protestant scholar.
For anyone interested he hosted naked bible podcast that is freely available.
If you're into woo-woo fringepop321 was his outlet as well and questions allowed might be worth checking out.
For starters search for Heiser logos documentary here on RUclips.
It all fits together, doesn't it?😊 Genesis is real history and we are all far closer to it then we can really realize (we are more affected by modernism and the evolution narrative than we realize, even if you don't believe it.)
If you're new to Heiser, the book to start with is The Unseen Realm. Heiser's work has a lot in common with that of Fr Stephen DeYoung, of the Lord of Spirits podcast.
@@arimathean4128 Thanks. I have read “Unseen Realm”, along with “Demons” and most of “Angels”. I do think you are right that “Unseen Realm” is probably the better starting work as it lays out the case in a gentler fashion for people who have never been exposed to this type of worldview. But “Reversing Hermon” is the more topical for the above discussion, and, in my opinion, an even more interesting read. But both are fantastic.
@@J.Tom.S Thanks. I have "Reversing Hermon" but haven't gotten around to reading it yet. I'll move it up on my reading list, along with 1 Enoch.
Hard to universalise this one, chaps, look forward to it! People may enjoy this analysis vid as a supplement: "№17 Beowulf's Bane | Anglo-Saxon origins & the eternal evils" Audience comment: "My god it was great, really set my mind alive. Haven't felt like this since peterson started the bible lectures."
In this series they do seem to celebrate both the culturally particular aspects of things as well as the way that they participate in a more universal Christian pattern. I know that's what they named this series, but do you actually think they over-emphasize the universal nature of the subjects they discuss?
@@maximosmagyar9653 a little, yes, in a negation of the particular. Even implicitly. But i'm glad it all exists. I mentioned in our dialogue that people are allergic to saying 'Anglo-Saxon' and Pageau has hosted two talks with Roland around the subject, so i'm glad for that-people need to be comfortable saying the word.
Everytime I hear "kinslaying", I think of Feanor.
My teacher made me read Beowulf in 7th grade. It was a short book. But I remember it kind of baffling me in a way that inspired a deep interest in reading and writing. Definitely taking this video as a sign to read Beowulf through myself again.
Awesome! I just did a video for Christmas that touched on Grendel's similarities to the Grinch. You guys took something as "cute" as Groundhog Day and revealed its cosmic implications. I look forward to seeing what you've gleaned from something as gritty and manly as Beowulf.
This was truly, truly excellent
To add to your discussion about giants and civilisation, see the Anglo Saxon poem "The Ruin". It describes a Roman ruin (the first cities in Britain were Roman) as the "handiwork of giants", "enta geweorc" in Old English.
Cities predate Roman occupation of Britain. The Celtic Oppidiums. ( I may have mispelled that, I don't know).
Also see the Gnomic Verses:
Cyning sceal rīce healdan.
Ceastre bēoð feorran gesyne,
*Orðanc enta geweorc,
Þā þe on þysse eorðan syndon,
Wrætlic wealstā a geweorc.
*Cunning work of giants, that are on this world fallen/aloof/sundered
@@jonathonfrazier6622possibly, but not that wide spread and certainly nothing like what we or the Romans would call cities.
Average Tolkien fan running to a Pageau video.
Welcome to the bottomless well.
Welcome. You’re in for a treat.
I loved your lecture. I recently watched a Beowulf video to prepare myself so I could follow this lecture. Richard , you are so knowledgable on this subject. I love learning from both of you.
In reguard to the idea of multiple gods not being Christian, this is a more modern mindset. If you have read Michael Heiser's book (Bible Scholar), The Unseen Realm, he talks a lot about the Counsel of gods in the old testament. He said the Bible must be read and understood in the context it was written. To do this you must understand the ancient mindset, which is what you and Jonathan talk about too. Michael Heiser says there is a counsel of gods in the old testament but that the Christian/Jewish God is the God above all other Gods. He also incorporates information from Enoch and other ancient literature to acurately understand the Bible. He said the NT Disciples would have had knowledge of these writings because they were commonly known at that time. He said when the the Tower of Bable was destroyed God gave some of the lesser gods authority over certain people groups and geographical areas. This could be another reason that so many stories are repeated in various cultures. He also talks about the the spirits and monsters that are a part of the full Bible story. It makes one read the Bible with more understanding. I love the idea of Universal History because I do think everything fits together and can only be fully understood by those who use God the Lord as a reference point.
Are you a Gnostic? You think "lesser" gods (you used capital G) are giving you hidden "knowledge" about our God's "true" will? Mate, those are demons. There is no "hidden" knowledge that communing with demons will give you, beyond that which will bring you (possibly eternal) harm, as it did Adam and Eve.
De council of de Ganja gods tell me to breeve de bref of de lyfe fo' eternal knowledge of de Great BONG In De Sky! I breeve de Brefalyfe upon you, dat you may be healed by de great Cannabis Council!
Is that an accurate summary of a "council"? I saw it in a dream so it must be real.
Smoking copious amounts of crack also reveals many hidden secrets, like how to carry full size refrigerators on one arm while riding a bicycle. Is there a Council of Crack too?
Okay, now this is epic
Been a long time since you guys mentioned the Goths and raised way more questions than were answered on these mysterious origins. Can't wait to delve deeper
This and the last universal history are the best ones yet, please do more on these topics!!!
Yes. This is what I have been waiting for.
Between these conversations and the scholarship of Tom Shippey and his book Beowulf and the North Before the Vikings, we have a very full picture of this time period in history. Bravo guys. And if you haven't heard of Tom's book... Highly recommend! Both of you should get together and compare notes. Your work very much compliments each other! ❤
point of clarification: @26m57s, the worst of the four sorts of betrayal in the final circle of Dante’s Inferno is betrayal of *benefactors*. betrayal of i. kin, ii. nations, iii. guests, and iv. *benefactors*, in that ascending order. Generally good otherwise. 🤙🏻
@36:35 Richard reaches for two volumes - his own translation. He is just amazing. And adorable, but let me not digress.
YEEEEESSSSS!!! I hope to meet Richard one day; coolest nerd ever, for serious. Keep these videos coming! Great stuff!
Oh baby let's go! Excited for this one
CAN’T WAIT FOR THIS!
Richard, if you want to build some hype for your RPG, some videos about how you designed the setting and rules / game design would be super interesting
"He's a hardliner when it comes to fairies." Can't explain why this makes me and Jonathan smile so much. Just goofy sounding.
A Beowulf course! Sign me up!
I haven't been able to find any info on Richard's Beowulf class. Has it started yet?
I feel like I'm REALLY late to the party.
I've seen you countless times on interviews with Jordan Peterson but for some reason never bothered to check if you had a youtube channel.
Well, good news for me, now I have a backlog to catch up on. : D
Finally. It has been too long between these!
Thank you for the knowledge
Amazing episode
At long last! It has arrived!
Really love this iteration of the intro music!!!
Looking forward to this!
The cavalcade of questions that get answered in these conversations…hell in the north; the burn of frost bite..
Thank you both. I definitely hope to participate in your class.
The Saxons were Christians. Some of the Norse tribes were Christians, but a few were still pagan. Mostly holdovers from the Roman pagan period, rather than ancient Norse gods, though there were still those too. Christianity seems to have spread faster and more traditionally Orthodox in more Western places, like England and France than in Italy. By the 600s AD, Christianity was firmly entrenched in the East and West.
My grandmother told me Beowulf was a story of Pagan/Christian conflict. Grendel, his mother represented the ancient pagan gods ir remainder of Nephlim, demanding terrible sacrifices, the dragon lurking evil or Satan. The hero from the North was a saviour, not Christ but perhaps a saint? Can't recall the detail but I loved this podcast.
In one of my other interests, folklore, anything that 19th Century antiquarians, folklore collectors and, especially in the case of Scotland, CoS Moderators didn't recognise from scripture was catalogued under "Pagan Hold over"
However subsequent research has shown pretty much every one of them developed within a Christian Context and often quite far into the middle ages. Some even date to around the time of the Reformation or even later!
The British Folklore Society were ahead of the curve for a long time. In the mid 20th century they ran regular questionnaires and found folklore developing in real time!
In the 1930s they found all kinds of superstitions around things that were unlucky to do on Fridays and separate superstitions around the number 13, such as it being an unlucky room number. It wasn't until the 1950s or 60s that the two came together. But if you ask you'll hear people projecting it back into history, usually to the Knights Templar.
A really good book to look at is Prof Ronald Hutton's book "Stations of the Sun", which is a history of the Ritual Calendar Year in Britain. Spoiler Alert: Halloween is thoroughly Christian!
Cool, will have to make time for this. This series and Jonathan helped me get into the Holy Fathers and Fr Rose and convert me to Orthodoxy.
I don’t feel I really need all the archetypal stuff and Imaginal stuff any more, but this series, Beowulf, folklore etc are all very educational and interesting.
If kept in its proper place and not mixed with the spirituality against hesychasm it’s all far better than the Gnostic/hermetic/Jungian/postmodern, consumerism, and government propaganda co-opting of myth, history, and fairy tales pumped 24/7 in entertainment, games and education.
If there are issues with different paths to Orthodoxy having different baggage, be it a softer academic approach that can be soft and move against patristics ceding to the times, or conversely the young guys coming in against that being rude to priests, I do think those coming in this way need to be very careful about Theosophy, process theology, Origenism (Jonathan himself is very careful there), Jung etc and get into the liturgy with a spiritual father that doesn’t allow for those things.
I know that splits with neoliberalism and conservatism via Peterson, but it also has extreme individualism not just from the Peterson side, but also the Gnostic psychedelic side, and on the side of natural/process theology the kind of stuff we saw with the Living Church and Christian esotericism Jonathan addressed in his video with Grail Country.
This overlaps with things like an OCA bishop rejecting the ecumenical councils to be amenable to ecumenicism and modernity and extra-ecclesiastical power in academia, and left wing infiltration, subversion and state influence and pressure through scandal as well as through both Constantinople under the Turks and the infiltration of the Vatican. It involves taking COVID money and deplatforming Abbot Tryphon by Ancient Faith and coincides with lists of who not to listen to as well to avoid these things and has strange overlap with neocon boomer mentalities.
I hope to see Jonathan address this with the more traditionalist priests like Fr Trenham, Fr Turbo, Fr Heers or Fr John Whiteford, or another discourse with Dyer.
Thanks for your work Jonathan and Richard. God bless and have a productive Lent.
The sword thing was interesting as David cut off Goliath's head with Goliath's sword.
That is a good point, thank you! David also took that sword when he sought sanctuary in the Tabernacle didn't he?
Loved this! And I want the class! ❤
Apparently it’s a Thomistic proverb: "hominem unius libri timeo" ('I fear the man of a single book').
“How did I confuse those two weirdos [Grant Morrison and Neil Gaimen]”
“I don’t know, how could you.”😂
What is the best version of Beowulf to read in preparation for the class Richard will be teaching. (I own Tolkien's translation.)
Richard told me the Ray Liuzza translation is his favorite--it cane out @ the same time as the Seamus Heeney one.
@@russellhoward3866 I bought both the Heany and Liuzza translations. The only Liuzza I could find was used with underlining and stupid marginal notes. (I hate marking up the texts of books. That’s why God created notebooks on day 6.5.)
Search on the publisher's website.
@@russellhoward3866 Thanks for the advise. A new book is on the way.
@@FDosty 👍
What do you think of the dragons on old Norwegian Stacekirkes? I think of them as guarding the treasure within.
A bit like gargoyles on later medieval churches or marginalia on manuscripts. Monsters in their proper place, guarding the peripherals of the centre
funnily enough, there are some critical race "scholars" who are grendel sympathizers, and shun beowulf for being a mean mad white man.
i enjoy these series immensely, keep it up!
Well, I’m not gonna use the R-word. But, I certainly understand the level of skepticism for obvious reasons. Plus, Beowulf was a monster slayer. So, there’s that😆
Scenes like the finding of the giants' sword make me think that Conan the Barbarian must have taken some direct inspiration from Beowulf.
Not a bad connection, for a mere castle age knight of course.
@spaak3465 Is that the taunting of longbowmen I hear?
The idea of dog headed men existed in native tribes too particularly mesoamerican tribes. Don’t quote me on that.
Is there some kind of universal history discord or group chat somewhere to discuss this stuff?
Richard
It would be lovely to get a version of your translation with footnotes, wheather as a publication or just you reeding from it
Aristotle said that if we knew 5 books really well we would be well-read.
49:02 this reminded me of the poem the pearl (by the sir Gawaine poet)
part of what the author seems to do is use images of Mary and combine them with images of the sanctified church and his daughter.
Have you come across the work The Heliand? I’m just discovering it, but it’s a translation of the Gospel written for the Germanic-Saxon people in the early centuries. The author understood that the mindset of the pagan north would be different from the Middle Eastern mind and so translated the Gospel to evangelize the Saxon people. Would be interested if this is something you’ve delved into.
I'm having a look myself, it's a Gospel Synchronization told in O.E. verse, isn't it? It came up on Jonathan's most recent video
Very epic!
Really interesting about Grendel being a decendent of Cain due to killing of kin and kin meaning fellow humans and the war of God v the giants being behind the flood also. I always thought the significance of the sword Beowulf found underwater was the tools of a place, like languages, are better used in that place, hence why his own sword failed. Why did Germanic people put hell in the north?
To the Germanic peoples, or at least the Norse ( the Norse get over-emphasized due to the lack of other surviving Germanic traditions), Hell is a place of Ice and cold, ruled by the goddesss Hel, daughter of Loki, from which the modern word " Hell" derives. Actually the place was'nt named Hell, it was Nifleheim.
Listening to this, I just realized that the xenomorph with its acidic blood is like Grendel and his mother
LARPagans can cope & seethe all they want; Beowulf will still remain a Christian story at the end of the day.
Indeed! Christ is King!
So true!
Plus, he did have some cool weapons. Can’t remember the exact names. The book is a hard read. But, worth it if you’re a young impressionable male interested in warrior stories and such.
When your religion is just a Frankenstein of every pagan religion then I guess everything pagan becomes Christian
How is it Christian? Beowulfs adventures are all motivated by his want for fame, glory and material wealth. There are a few references to genesis and God as a sort of diety that controls fate, but none of Jesus christ.
If any man ever pulls out his own translation of Beowulf in a conversation with me, I'm marrying that man.
Luther and Cranmer wrote homilies for the priests to read aloud, it was very common among Protestants of that time to read written homilies. The avoidance of it today is the aberration. But actually a lot of protestant pastors still do it; that is what that whole plagiarism scandal in the SBC was about
Can anyone recommend me which edition of Beowulf I should buy?
Pretty cool now to think of the Danes and Geats as Orthodox potentially. BC when I was a protestant and read this. Just assumed they were "catholic"
Which translation would Richard suggest (other than his own), for Beowulf? Would Tolkien’s be the best, since Tolkien is translating it from a strong traditional Catholic background?
Please, do one about the Epic of Gilgamesh
Are y'all going to go through the Mabinogion at some point?
Richard, publish your translation!?
Beyond his hand written translation, is there a particular edition of Beowulf Richard would recommend?
I don’t know the answer, but I know Tolkien wrote a translation and commentary… I’m drawn to anything by Tolkien lol. So that’s what I’m drawn to
Tolkien.
I love you guys 👍👍
Somewhere, I read that "EL" was what God was called around the time of Abraham, and that any name ending in "el" signifies belonging to God (Israel) or from God - but I am no scholar, and I can't recall the source material.
Yeah, it means divine and can be used to describe the most high or lesser divine beings. Old English has a similar word "Os" where names like Osgar (divine+spear) or Osric (divine+rule) come from. It's also cognate with Old Norse Æs, which you find in Æsir and Æsgard (which are both pronounced like the OE Os)
From chatGPT: Peterson and Pageau, as modern-day oracles, illuminate the path toward self-discovery, bridging the chasm between ancient wisdom and contemporary understanding. Their insights, shimmering like dewdrops on the leaves of our collective knowledge, nourish our thirst for meaning and purpose amidst the chaos of existence.
😂
I remember reading a portion of the poem at 17. I conclude the a large part of it must have been derived from early cristeon belfes. I was told that it was pigeon I think I dropped the topic but still it seems undoubtably influenced by cristanty.
I've heard that the folk song " John barleycorn" has some connections with the Beowulf story.
"John Barleycorn" is a whiskey recipe.
Reupload? I remember watching this a few months ago.
Interesting bit about the giant sword... any similarities between that and Goliath's sword that is held with the ark of the covenant? very interesting
Not sure. From what I understand Beowulf has similar invincibility to King Arthur. It may have something to do with him being king. Not clear on whether a sword is tied into that or not. But, essentially it’s because he was fated to be king.
It's pretty neat if you read the poem, it's said to have a serpent twisting around the hilt. Gives me Garden of Eden vibes.
All of this is so strange, makes too much sense. As does the rest of the series.
I was raised Baptist, mid-west. And watching Orthodox and Catholoc teaching makes me feel like I have lived on the word of God, it was bread and water. No meat of Christ or Wine of Christ or fruit or vegetables or honey or milk.
Personally I try to form stories to understand the world around me. Day dreaming for understanding, personal indulgence, escapism. Partly due to me having aspergers but I don't know were Aspergers ends and I begin.
Hearing tales and stories and history here from Jon and Crew is immense to think and process and points out that all the stories I form or were given to form I have been, too much I have been selfish with or formed and played them to satisfy only carnal desires. Not to develop, to share, and to use them for constructive ends for myself and others.
I'm not sure what I'm stating here, but in the least prayer that I can more properly understand legends, history, and symbolism around me or shown to me and that I don't selfishly keep my stories hidden regardless if they are competently written
The question is whether it is theologically correct in presupposing that it's good to imply grace outside the Church.
"Down from the moorlands misting fells came Grendel stalking, God's brand was on him"
Which translation should I buy? You seem to have strong feelings but the Beowulf link on the Symbolic World website is broken.
The intro music has video game "GAME OVER" vibes, but in a nice chill way.
When is universal history coming to North America? the song of Hiawatha, Wacousta, the popol Vuhl and many other things.
That's funny. I was just wondering if they would ever touch of Hiawatha. They have done some work on North America, but mostly with traditions of the USA.
Anyone here read Headley's re-telling? What did you think?
I plan to read it, but I am ready for it to be a re-telling that reflects the authour's views, and not the poem itself.
Me too !
great class! two questions: what year do scholars think this story was written and of what thought concerning Beowulf was Tolkien? again very interesting talk
So basically I just realized how much Beowulf poem is in The Hobbit
Hi Johnathan, I’ve been watching your videos and interactions with Dr. Peterson and others for some time, thank you for helping us understand the patterns of reality! I just watched an old video of yours, symbolic vs literal interpretation of the Bible, and I have a question which I want to comment on here because I don’t know if you would see this comment under an old video.
Everything you say about intrinsic symbolic nature of reality seems true, but why is it that you cannot conclude with something straightforward such as,
“I believe, as the church has always taught in its creeds and confessions, as historical fact, that there was, in 1st century Palestine, a Jewish man named Jesus from the town of Nazareth. The biblical gospels are an accurate representation of his life and teachings. On a certain day in the early 30s A.D., this historical Jesus of Nazareth was crucified in plain view of the public under the Roman authority of Pontius Pilate, and his dead body was put into a marked tomb. Yet this tomb was found to be empty on the third day after the burial. The most obvious non-supernatural explanation of this event has always been that body was stolen or misplaced somehow. Yet against all reason, his disciples began to teach that they encountered their rabbi Jesus in a resurrected form, in his same flesh and blood body, bearing the marks of his crucifixion, but somehow alive again, eating and drinking normal food with them, but that this was also a transformed and immortal body, which they saw ascend to into heaven and disappear in front of their eyes. They did not understand everything they saw and experienced, but the disciples each went to their deaths because they could not deny what they saw, and they believed they would also be raised to life one day with the same kind of immortal resurrection body which they saw with their own eyes and touched with their hands. The unbeliever will say that this was a lie or a mass hallucination, but I believe the Apostles were neither lying nor hallucinating, but rather they were witnesses to a truly unique miraculous event in the history, a one-of-a-kind one-place-one-time intersection of the divine Logos with the created order. And this event is the center of the cosmos, in which we find all meaning and purpose, through which we have hope for union with God into eternal life and joy.”
Do you not affirm the historicity of the resurrection of Christ as I described? I get the sense that you do, but somehow you always skirt around the question for reasons I do not fully grasp.
I think the Poem is fairly clear that Beowulf is meant to reflect the pre-Christian Godfearers, and set him against the pagans of the North. The idea being that just because paganism was the main religion of the Germanic peoples, and the Scandinavians in particular. Still, God had a remnant of righteous Gentiles (like Cornelius from the Book of Acts).
This is why, despite Beowulf clearly being a worshipper of the God of gods, the Poem never mentions Christ, or Jesus, or the Apostles, or anything else from the New Testament times. Because Beowulf is Godfearer, and one of the Righteous Gentiles.
I don't think pagans have got much to do with it. It seems that as far as the poet is concerned there are no other gods, pagans are just worshiping powers and principality that are under God. Beowulf is fighting demons and monsters, the spirits of kin-slaying and chaos.
Richards professor called the poet a "hard liner"?!? Dr. Tom Shippey?!? He's not the only one to use the phrase I suppose but I've heard him use it many times!
Can you refer to a recommended translation please?
How's the Tolkien translation of Beowulf?
Which is a good translation for Beowulf?
💜
Sacramental imagination is this really a good way to portray understanding of the Holy Mysteries. Pageau, Rohlin, Fr Andrew Stephen Damick Kotar, and others are the new Orthodox Fantasy School. All excellent academics and I am sure very well meaning, but there is no monastic grounding. They grew up around Western fantasy as children and this along with western style academia where nothing is forbidden all guides a lot of their though. Like the Parisian School, there may be some good but there is also a lot of danger and bad. Understanding imagery of Orthodox Christian writings, stories, lessons is very good and needed in the west where much has been forgotten, the entire mystical mindset had been lost, but it needs to be viewed from a sober spiritual life. Being tantalised and enticed by imagination and mythical worlds (not Beowulf, but LOTR and others) as they discuss in other podcasts has many dangerous slopes to fall down.
We do not need to “Imagine” the holy mysteries, we know! Saint John of the Ladder says imagination is of the daemons. The angels are present with The Christ in the altar and all the Temple during the liturgy . We do not need to imagine them. Also just because some ancient writers may have been Christian does not mean what they wrote was not influenced by demonic powers intended to confuse or lead people away. I just stress caution with all this renewed academic interest explaining imagery, myths, stories, fantasies and using that to view our True Faith.
The scriptures also blatantly state that the outer courts would be trampled on by the Gentiles/Pagans. So, basically illiterate morons getting ahold of sacred info and mutilating it to their own interpretation.
Yes! I came in through this way via Jordan Peterson/Jung/Vervaeke and Pageau, and am very grateful for that but there are going to be many who do not understand this and want to mix the intermediary realm into Orthodoxy via Jungianism and Theosophy.
It’s wrong and dangerous and should be addressed with caveats every time they talk. There is good and interesting history here and a place for fairy tales and psychology outside and below the faith, but much of this was and is used for subversion and against Christianity from the Renaissance to German criticism, new age, masonry and illumanism, Hollywood, academia and post modernism. We should be very careful not to rebuild Orthodoxy on that.
Pageau has been pretty good about caveats there and church closings, as well as accepting the councils rejection of Origen, but there are some danger zones along with Damick and the de platforming of Abbot Tryphon.
It is typically in these open minded circles that Origenism, David Bentley Hart, Sophiology etc intellectualize the faith and cede ground to leftism and globalism (if other routes lead to phylotism and young men being rude to priests that is a separate issue.) I know there are other factors as well such as scandals (which there were in The Lives of The Saints or Herod as a puppet for the Romans, and Paul’s epistles), to the geopolitical pressure on Constantinople since WWI, but these things have to be addressed.
Can the first 6 minutes be put at the end?
Role playing Owl just like Moloch
Or Lilith
You mention that the book of enoch banned by the Pope? I tried searching but can't find anything.
What translation is recommended?
I have heard good things about Tolkien's translation. I was actually surprised they didn't mention it.
@@lausdeo4944 as an alternative try that by Seamus Heaney
It's possible that the flood didn't wipe out all the Giants, but greatly reduced thier food supply such that they starved but humans didn't, and the remaining Ginats were taken care of by the humans slowly over time.
Hebrews 12:12((N.L.T.))👑
**👉🏽💪🏽
Top keks