@@Ulaanbasaarshould say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say
I never felt so insignificant about myself on how spacious space really is since I watched your videos. You nail on showing sizes and distances on perspectives. Thanks for the existential dread on this sunday morning.
"A star so gigantic that it completely engulfs the first 6 planets of the Solar System would barely even make it halfway to the orbit of Uranus" this guy is roasting us
This video teaches us 2 things 1 there are stars so massive that the engulf Saturn and what's before it 2 the solar system is gigantic not even the biggest star can reach that size
Those probably aren’t EBLM J0555-57Ab’s true stats, since it’s a system of several stars where one is 1.4 million kilometers in diameter and another is also a similar size. According to more recent measurements WOH G64 (2.14 Billion Kilometers) dwarfs Stephenson 2-18’s recent estimates (1.5 Billion Kilometers)
@@albireo2990 That page is literally in my video sources.🤨 The page says EBLM J0555-57 is the system, EBLM J0555-57Ab is the smallest star.🙃 Also, I meant smallest not largest in my last post. LOL
WOH G64 has been considered possibly the largest star since 2009 along with VY Canis Majoris (1.97 billion kilometers). Stephenson 2-18 also does not have any other size estimates other then the inaccurate 3 billion kilometers, so its best to just exclude it entirely.
@@BlenderTimer Looking forward for the future where you can get paid enough from this channel to pay for some editors, allowing you to post more frequently.
Keep in mind that there's not much anything else that affects the planets. Therefore, you only need a little bit of gravity to lock them in place. It's like floating in still water; with only a little push or pull you'll float away. And compared to the the nearly absolute absence of gravity in space, the pull of the sun makes a enormous difference. edit: oh and by the way ever heard about the Kuiper belt and Oort cloud? Those objects are up to 10.000 times further away from the sun than uranus and neptune are. And they still circle around the sun ;)
One simple answer: mass. The sun is so massive that it takes up 99.86% of the total mass in the solar system. That means the gravity it exerts attracts celestial bodies even from massive distances.
Don't worry, once that hydrogen is exhausted and it starts fusing helium...it will become a red giant, once the helium is gone its over, Sol ain't got enough mass to fuse the next element available which I believe is carbon.
If the sun were replaced with the most massive star, R136a1, every single planet, dwarf planet, asteroid, moon, and any other stellar object, would vaporize in approximately 15 years. While this seems like a while, the innermost terrestrial planets would vaporize within less than 3 days…
words can't describe how underrated you are and I'm being serious. you deserve 100k and 1M! thank you for this insightful video. we are really really lucky to have the sun
You have to wonder how far the planets would have to be to function similarly to our own solar system, And at what distance earth could be habitable as it is now
Crazy to see just how far everything actually is but if anything was even slightly off we’d all be fxckxd. Glad yall considered this video idea and actually made it come to fruition as well, thanks a lot this was dope 🤘🏾💯
I know a bigger star bigger than Stephenson 2-18 /meet QUASI STAR THE LARGEST STAR IN THE UNIVERSE/ITS SO LARGE IT WILL REACH THE ORBIT OF NEPTUNE /ITS 2x BIGGER THAN STEPHENSON 2-18 5:28 so quasi star is the biggest
@@BlenderTimerStephenson 2-18’s position, luminosity, temperature, size, and other properties have many uncertainties and should not be used. If you checked the newer revisions of the list of largest stars on wikipedia it wouldn’t be there.
@@BlenderTimer stephenson 2-18's size was a mistake and was recently disproven. it is a very uncertain star and should never be used in any video. he is right, and woh g64 is the largest. please do your research.
@@BlenderTimerAlso, last time I checked, a well determined luminosity, temperature, distance, and size is more accurate than a star with an uncertainty of over 50% in its distance… 😂
All the resources I could find listed WOH-G64 far smaller than Stephenson 2-18, it was mostly some random RUclips video that told everyone it was the new one. Of course, none of these measurements are 100% accurate. Most of them are just estimates since we really can't see these stars well at all.😄
I like the video, but here’s my suggestion for the next video. You can add the star WR 142, which despite its small size of 0.8 suns, is 912,000 times brighter.
@@BlenderTimer Adjectives matter in astronomy my friend. In astronomy the word massive in relation to stars generally refers to mass since mass is how stars are primarily measured along with their bolometric luminosity and spectra. For a stars physical dimensions the dwarf/giant terminology is generally used. If you want to talk about a stars physical dimensions gigantic is a far better descriptor than massive. Its less ambiguous.
I always thought the sun was a pretty tiny star compared to some of the supergiants out there, but it's actually slightly larger than average. It'd be like comparing a 5'11" man to a 7'2" man.
For anyone confused about the smallest star being smaller than Jupiter or Saturn : it all lies in density. Because of the nuclear fusion taking place inside stars, they're required to have a far higher gravity to maintain their hydrostatic equilibrium. This means that their inside is essentially a lot denser than a gaz giant's (which is still incredibly dense when you go closer and closer to their core), hence how the the smallest stars can be smaller in size compared to the largest planets. But remember : it doesn't mean that they're less massive. Mass is what determines if a celestial body can ignite nuclear fusion and become a star. This means all stars, even the smallest red dwarfs, are more massive than the largest planets despite thr largest planets being bigger in size than the smallest stars.
Remember that no matter how bright noon might be with a different star in the solar system, it still won't be brighter than your shining beautiful face. and it still won't be as hot as florida.
Space is amazing and scary at the same time and for the exact same reason. We know some of what's out there which fascinating but terrifying, and then there is so much more we don't know that's out there which is also fascinating.. and terrifying!
Honestly, the biggest (pun intended) thing I got from this video is just the ridiculous scale of distances. For pretty much the whole video the planets are single pixels, if that, and Uranus and Neptune are so far away that zooming out that far makes the terrestial planets' labels overlap.
1:13, that doesn’t seem right in the slightest. Surely it’d be dimmer and colder on Earth if this star replaced our sun, as a star smaller than Jupiter and Saturn, would be much colder, and much dimmer than our sun.
For anyone wondering! He has a Discord server
discord.gg/EBYeZ3E58c
LOL
they have no idea how impossible this was...
ok
deez cord
this is unfunny
@@adsadadadadadadadassa deez nuts
i
Never realised that our sun is so small compared to other stars and giant compared to others
Yeah. I mean I knew the Sun was small, but not quite that small!😂
@@BlenderTimerwhat
@@notifydr wdym what?🤔
@@BlenderTimer and whats more crazy is that there is more to the universe, alot more that we dont know. yet
@@mrtopjoey Yeah!
“What if we replace the sun with other stars” should the title of this video should say.
Yeah
I don’t mean to be *that guy* but you could’ve left out the “should say” at the end of your comment
""What if we replace the sun with other stars" is the title of this video should say" should the title of this video should say.
@@rafaelgames720should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say.
@@Ulaanbasaarshould say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say should say
I'm just shocked that the smallest star we know of would make earth THAT much bright and hotter
Same.😂
It's like an angry toddler
@@Xnoob545 such a good analogy
@@Xnoob545 Nah, chihuahua
How would it be hotter if it has less heat?
I never felt so insignificant about myself on how spacious space really is since I watched your videos. You nail on showing sizes and distances on perspectives. Thanks for the existential dread on this sunday morning.
but you are both insignificant and significant if you look both ways
LOL You're welcome!🤣
It's not the size. It's how you use it!
The screen getting filled with Betelgeuse at Earth at 3:21 got me laughing! 😂🤣
3:21 Betelgeuse woul- *COMPLETELY FILLED UP WITH BETELGEUSE* That literally got me so bad
I SEE YOU ON EVERY SPACE VIDEO
3:22
They need to stop named a star/planet like a freaking wifi password
Yeah, name them... Bob or something,
Yeah i don't think Bob-176V9018G is good either
@@OrionTheHunter098 yeah i don't think Bob-1729J7098 is good either
One of them are my wifi password
Setup-Acc
"A star so gigantic that it completely engulfs the first 6 planets of the Solar System would barely even make it halfway to the orbit of Uranus"
this guy is roasting us
This video teaches us 2 things
1 there are stars so massive that the engulf Saturn and what's before it
2 the solar system is gigantic not even the biggest star can reach that size
Very good summary!
Even with 64k subscribers, I think your channel is incredibly underrated.
Thank you!
R u from the future cuz i see he has 60.3k?
@@ItsOfficialArano Yeah, LOL idk
@blenderTimer I think your channel deserves 1T subscriber
@@Amandaeulo Uh..........ok LOL😂
Those probably aren’t EBLM J0555-57Ab’s true stats, since it’s a system of several stars where one is 1.4 million kilometers in diameter and another is also a similar size.
According to more recent measurements WOH G64 (2.14 Billion Kilometers) dwarfs Stephenson 2-18’s recent estimates (1.5 Billion Kilometers)
Not exactly. EBLM J0555-57 is the system, EBLM J0555-57Ab is the largest star in the system.
@@albireo2990 That page is literally in my video sources.🤨
The page says EBLM J0555-57 is the system, EBLM J0555-57Ab is the smallest star.🙃
Also, I meant smallest not largest in my last post. LOL
WOH G64 has been considered possibly the largest star since 2009 along with VY Canis Majoris (1.97 billion kilometers). Stephenson 2-18 also does not have any other size estimates other then the inaccurate 3 billion kilometers, so its best to just exclude it entirely.
Also, UY Scuti is only 1.3 billion km based on a size from 2023
@@BlenderTimer ah I see, soz
0:21 not again
I wish you made more content you makes alot of things very easy to understand
Thanks! It takes so much time though...😂
@@BlenderTimer Looking forward for the future where you can get paid enough from this channel to pay for some editors, allowing you to post more frequently.
@@Douglas12ds54 LOL
I swear they name some of these stars by fistfighting the keyboard 💀
LOL
3:21 "Uhhhhhh......." Got Me Dying
1:13 like, why tho? Why can this star that's smaller than the sun produce so much more light? What's special about it?
idk
I'd expect that to be answered in the video
Because not all stars have the same luminance.
0:03 "1.4"
4: Nah im out, take my place 3
thank you for making these type of videos you help me learn something new every time you post something new. keep posting and never give up
Thank you!
I love how he makes it intense in a funny way
This video just made me realize how insanely large the planets orbits are. Like how does the sun even affect things THAT far away?
Keep in mind that there's not much anything else that affects the planets. Therefore, you only need a little bit of gravity to lock them in place. It's like floating in still water; with only a little push or pull you'll float away. And compared to the the nearly absolute absence of gravity in space, the pull of the sun makes a enormous difference.
edit: oh and by the way ever heard about the Kuiper belt and Oort cloud? Those objects are up to 10.000 times further away from the sun than uranus and neptune are. And they still circle around the sun ;)
One simple answer: mass. The sun is so massive that it takes up 99.86% of the total mass in the solar system. That means the gravity it exerts attracts celestial bodies even from massive distances.
i like your artstyle. Its very recognizable and simple yet effective at showing information.
Thanks!
Such a great work really! We need more videos like that! Thank you
Thanks!
@@BlenderTimer Welcome
The only thing I still didn’t understand is how the smallest star ever discovered is still brighter and hotter than our sun
All of this is not new information for me as my dad is an astronomer but the animations are awesome I think it makes people learn faster
The Sun is so big yet so small at the same time it is confusing and yet easy to understand
Don't worry, once that hydrogen is exhausted and it starts fusing helium...it will become a red giant, once the helium is gone its over, Sol ain't got enough mass to fuse the next element available which I believe is carbon.
If the sun were replaced with the most massive star, R136a1, every single planet, dwarf planet, asteroid, moon, and any other stellar object, would vaporize in approximately 15 years.
While this seems like a while, the innermost terrestrial planets would vaporize within less than 3 days…
Your voice is so relaxing, a great video man it was rly informative
LOL 🙃
Thanks!
words can't describe how underrated you are and I'm being serious. you deserve 100k and 1M! thank you for this insightful video. we are really really lucky to have the sun
Thank you!
Certainly glad we have the Sun and not another star!😂
Share his video left and right with all so that he can gain more subs.
@@lightindarknessite 😂
This video is very well made! I hate to see that this channel is seriously underrated. I hope it grows quickly.
Thank you!😄
We just need to share it with everyone so that it can gain more subs.
@@lightindarknessite LOL
One of the best informative channels i've ever found! Greetings from Italy 🇮🇹
Thank you!
You have to wonder how far the planets would have to be to function similarly to our own solar system,
And at what distance earth could be habitable as it is now
don't look into the sky, the sun is a deadly laser
Commenting just to boost the algorithm for you. This one was as incredible as all your other videos. Sending thumbs up from the Czech republic! ❤❤
Very cool! Thank you!😃
Sun: gets replaced by Rigel.
Me: cutely goes to mars
Literally if the sun was 1% bigger we would already get slightly cooked, 10% pretty dead and 25% only those in bunkers would survive
3:21
EVERYTHING IS ON FIRE!
ALSO EVERYONE IS DEAD
Yeah...😐
@@BlenderTimerAAAAAAAAAQQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAWAAAAAAAAAAAAAOAJSB ŲŲHŲŲYRREHFIIR
We're not dead
Is it me or is this the real life lore narrator
3:45 If I ever get into such a situation, I'll simply inform an adult and stop panicking. 😊
underrated channel. keep up the awesome work
Thank you!
1:32 Kurzgesagt:
"Look what they need to mimic fraction of our power"
“As we all know, this gigantic star will very quickly become completely- *ahem”
5:48 That's almost 1000 times the distance between the Earth and the Sun!
Intelligent Design.
These videos are very well made! As always
Thank you!
We're getting melted with this one 🗣🔥🔥🔥🔥
What about a neutron star
love your channel dude, keep it up
Thanks!
Crazy to see just how far everything actually is but if anything was even slightly off we’d all be fxckxd. Glad yall considered this video idea and actually made it come to fruition as well, thanks a lot this was dope 🤘🏾💯
You're welcome! Thanks for the idea!
The Earth getting completely incinerated at 30,000 celcius in 6:15 got me
1:15 hey man, I noticed a huge mistake here. Those are the figures for EBLM J05G5-57Aa, not Ab
I know a bigger star bigger than Stephenson 2-18 /meet QUASI STAR THE LARGEST STAR IN THE UNIVERSE/ITS SO LARGE IT WILL REACH THE ORBIT OF NEPTUNE /ITS 2x BIGGER THAN STEPHENSON 2-18 5:28 so quasi star is the biggest
0:58 the smallest star we know of is actually Luhman 16
Luhman 16 is a binary brown dwarf system, not a star.
stephenson 2-18 is NOT the largest star, it was shown that WOH G64 is the largest at 1540 sr
No it's Stephenson 2-18. Last I checked, 1540 is less than 2150...😂
@@BlenderTimer no bro, i mean stephenson 2-18 size was a very bad estimate and the star is probably not even a red supergiant
@@BlenderTimerStephenson 2-18’s position, luminosity, temperature, size, and other properties have many uncertainties and should not be used. If you checked the newer revisions of the list of largest stars on wikipedia it wouldn’t be there.
@@BlenderTimer stephenson 2-18's size was a mistake and was recently disproven. it is a very uncertain star and should never be used in any video. he is right, and woh g64 is the largest. please do your research.
@@BlenderTimerAlso, last time I checked, a well determined luminosity, temperature, distance, and size is more accurate than a star with an uncertainty of over 50% in its distance… 😂
The new largest star i think is WOH-G64
All the resources I could find listed WOH-G64 far smaller than Stephenson 2-18, it was mostly some random RUclips video that told everyone it was the new one.
Of course, none of these measurements are 100% accurate. Most of them are just estimates since we really can't see these stars well at all.😄
Crazy that you forgot R136a1
1:03 XD
Me then: PAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
its EE bEE ell emm jay zero five five five dash five seven ay bee
Average winter day in south florida
Why is EMBL-5555Ab making Earth hot instead of cold
Cool
I have another existentional crisis
The other one is from kurzgesagt
😂
@@BlenderTimer ah yes, my favourite star/space object; HIPSO12-2000AAPQWOAP12ADF
5:33 SATURN NOOOOOO 😭🪐
Oh sorry besides that good job on this! Never knew a man could be so specific
😂 Thanks!
Could you do a video about the dimmest/coldest stars next?
I like the video, but here’s my suggestion for the next video. You can add the star WR 142, which despite its small size of 0.8 suns, is 912,000 times brighter.
Insane video master!
Thank you!
He used the luminosity of Eblm j0555-57 Aa. The star this small cannot get that effect
0:06 Diameter isnt a measure of mass!!!!! The mass of the sun is 1.989x10^30kg. 🙄
"Massive" can refer to either mass or size.
@@BlenderTimer Adjectives matter in astronomy my friend. In astronomy the word massive in relation to stars generally refers to mass since mass is how stars are primarily measured along with their bolometric luminosity and spectra. For a stars physical dimensions the dwarf/giant terminology is generally used. If you want to talk about a stars physical dimensions gigantic is a far better descriptor than massive. Its less ambiguous.
@@PoorMansChemist Well...I just tried Googling "what is a massive star". First thing I got was "A massive star is a huge star".🤷♂
🤓☝️
@@PoorMansChemist Are all his viewers astronomers?
Quasi Star pls
Not real
Would Stephenson make Pluto an option?
This channel is still so underrated!
Thank you!
I always thought the sun was a pretty tiny star compared to some of the supergiants out there, but it's actually slightly larger than average. It'd be like comparing a 5'11" man to a 7'2" man.
I mean, 75% of the stars in our galaxy are red dwarfs which tend to be small, so there's that.
3:14 I DIDN'T EVEN KNOW DIAMOND WAS MELTABLE-
For anyone confused about the smallest star being smaller than Jupiter or Saturn : it all lies in density. Because of the nuclear fusion taking place inside stars, they're required to have a far higher gravity to maintain their hydrostatic equilibrium. This means that their inside is essentially a lot denser than a gaz giant's (which is still incredibly dense when you go closer and closer to their core), hence how the the smallest stars can be smaller in size compared to the largest planets. But remember : it doesn't mean that they're less massive. Mass is what determines if a celestial body can ignite nuclear fusion and become a star. This means all stars, even the smallest red dwarfs, are more massive than the largest planets despite thr largest planets being bigger in size than the smallest stars.
Remember that no matter how bright noon might be with a different star in the solar system, it still won't be brighter than your shining beautiful face.
and it still won't be as hot as florida.
When he said Betelgeuse, I thought he said beetle juice. 😂
this boutta be crazy
i was right
Hear me out….
All of this still fits in our screens 💀
Ur content is litttttt 🔥 🔥
Thank you!
Space is amazing and scary at the same time and for the exact same reason. We know some of what's out there which fascinating but terrifying, and then there is so much more we don't know that's out there which is also fascinating.. and terrifying!
just based on how the name looks, I'm calling the smallest star Emblem Jostar
1:13 wait how? Aren’t smaller less massive stars cooler?
Now one with black holes please? And it would be cool if you include Gargantua.
Mmmm, not big enough, whip out the quasi stars!
What is VY cans Majoris?
A star...
this but with black holes would be crazy
What was the Quasi star?
How does the smallest star cause the earth to be so hot?
Wouldn't all these difverent stars have some gravitational effects as well?
Yeah.
I ignored gravitational effects for this video though because otherwise, everything would just be sucked in. LOL
@@BlenderTimer Lol, fair.
could you make a video that’s the same but with black holes? would be interesting I think!
I don't currently have any plans for one so I can't really confirm whether I will or won't. LOL
How can a tiny red dwarf be hotter and brighter than our sun?
Can someone please elaborate?
I love how you question your own words or script lol
"Oh, look, a new star, it's now A1coolguyZ26"
Honestly, the biggest (pun intended) thing I got from this video is just the ridiculous scale of distances. For pretty much the whole video the planets are single pixels, if that, and Uranus and Neptune are so far away that zooming out that far makes the terrestial planets' labels overlap.
The biggest thing I got is that Polaris melts steel beams
Oh right 1:03 thats called EBLM J0555 57Ab
The Sun is bigger than 80 percent of the stars in the known umiverse.
YOU DIDNT KNOW THE SUN WAS SMAL ASF?!?!!
U should be over 5M subs at least man
I dont understand how youtube work
LOL Thanks!
It works with a lot of luck basically
We need to share it with more people
I have one word to state.
“Quasai”.
Imagine a small planet sized star is 3x hotter than the sun 💀
1:13, that doesn’t seem right in the slightest. Surely it’d be dimmer and colder on Earth if this star replaced our sun, as a star smaller than Jupiter and Saturn, would be much colder, and much dimmer than our sun.
Why Is It So Small But So Bright? 1:22