WHAT A FINAL CHORD!! The Beatles "A Day In The Life" (Remastered 2009) | REACTION
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 июн 2024
- Mugnify Reacts To A Day In The Life (Remastered 2009)
Road to 100k Subs
💰 SUPPORT/DONATE TO THE CHANNEL
►patreon.com/mugnifyreacts
►Cashapp: $ALJ83
►Paypal: paypal.me/MugetsuZeiro
►www.buymeacoffee.com/MUGNIFIED
►My Amazon WishList: www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls...
THE GOODS!!
amzn.to/3XKvXPz
www.underluckystars.com/MUGNI...
📢 GET IN TOUCH WITH ME
►Instagram: / mugnifyreacts
►Twitter: / mugnifyrts
*Copyright Disclaimer
Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS* 
Развлечения
![MORTAL KOMBAT 1 - KOMBAT PACK 2 REVEAL TRAILER!! [REACTION]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Mi2M58zEQVc/mqdefault.jpg)
You really don't know much about great music, do you son!
You might wanna go back to that hip-shit, or hip hope, or hip hop whetever it is!
@@paulsullivan1650I’ll let my real subs talk to you
It's definitely a pin of shame. Music transcends race, age, and status. You don't have to be anything or anybody to listen to a certain kind of music.
This is a very strange remix though imo. Prefer the original
@paulsullivan why don't you quit telling people what to like or do! Are you a control freak or something? Your social skills seem to be seriously lacking !
It's a hard heart and deaf ear that writes smack about a man on a 🎶 journey, and invites us along. I ❤ Mugnify bc he is learning from his audience & we're learning from him.
Just imagine what our facial expressions were back in 1967 when this came out!!! A MASTERPIECE!!!
What in the world was that ...A master piece
Re-mastering doesn't usually change vocal channels. It simply improves audio quality of a recording. Sort of like sharpening a picture. Re-mixing would change the vocal channels. They probably wouldn't change that though because the original mono and stereo mixes are somewhat historical documents in music history.
When recordings are mixed, they're mixed for the media of the time. In the '60s, people were listening to AM radio and vinyl, mostly. Because of the limited bandwidth and frequency response of that media, your final mix down and equalization has to sound good for those mediums. As time goes on, media technology gets better, so when they go back to the master tapes they can add stereo information that was never put on to media before because the limitations of the past technology is not in the way anymore. When they go back to the masters, they have to mix and equalize every track all over again, and so it's far more than just a higher resolution, it's usually a very different experience altogether, depending on who does the final mix and with what technology they used to do it with.
I believe groups re-master their songs because at a certain point (say twenty years) the rights to the music reverts to the original artist from the label. But the original recording (would still be owned by the label).
Remastering doesn't really change it that much, it's mostly EQ and compression and stuff. Remixing is a different matter obviously. But as someone else pointed out, really the original recordings have kind of just become part of our music history, and I don't think you will see them significantly changed. The biggest thing in that direction was many years ago and they released a lot of the early stuff in true stereo, rather than mono or fake stereo.
@@stevedahlberg8680The Beatles too clever for their own good.
@@stevedahlberg8680 The original artists remaster to get a bigger chunk of change.
It's from 1967 at a British studio that only had 4 channels to work with. What they were able to accomplish is an engineering marvel. By today's standards, primitive. And yet, no one has topped this even until today.
I just love Ringo's drumming in this song. They start out so timid and uncertain, then they hit the pocket during the the 'ahhh ah ah ah ahhhh....' It's fucking amazing.
It's his best drumming on record, in my opinion. Just supports the mood of the song so well, while being so different and punchy in its on right.
One of my top favorite Beatles songs. Enjoy 😂
Back in that day stereo was fairly new. They use the separation of channels in stereo to create a sense of three-dimensionality they did so by panning back and forth with vocals and other instruments
It is a thought provoking song, the structure alone is fascinating considering the era, Beatles were at the top of their game
your facial expression during the middle of the song ,when everything changes, was spot on.
yeah I think most of us thought the same thing when we first heard that song! 🤣
Your reaction said it all - how do you think we felt hearing this back in 1967 😊
I hesitate to…This song is so brilliant, I get upset when the topic is not understood. Still relevant today.
More Beatles Please! Beatles/If I Fell😮😊
😂 ❤ Loved your reaction. Your expression.😂😂
Best-selling artists of all time for a reason 😉
The Beatles at this time were in full experimental mode. There was little of convention that interested them. The vocals are shifting, drums unsteady but always tasteful ... Great stuff
We didn't listen to music in headphones back then, speakers.
That last note is three different pianos hitting an E-Major chord at the same time.
Chord
@@MrDiddyDee yep, typo, thanks
Beatles Forever,!
A Masterpiece of music
no one seems to ever catch the joke - "now they know how many holes it takes to Fill the albert hall." by definition a hole is an empty crevis. a hole can't fill anything! one if the best songs ever written and performed. there's quite a few of them. its amazing just how many of them are beatle songs. thanks for video.
that last bit was an uncredited piece called "the inner groove." old vinyl has a silent play-out section at the end of each side. when the stylus hit the end it would jump back a little and just keep doing that until someone got up and manually cradled it. on this album the beatles decided to add a little something in that "inner groove." played backwaords it says - i'll "f" you like superman." "the inner groove" didn't appear on the american/capitol release of "sgt pepper."
This was the last song on the album, meant to serve as the 'climax'. That why the drama was turned up a notch.
John, scrambling that morning to still come up with a song after given weeks before the new album, picked up the morning paper, and basically wrote a few headlines and lines from the paper for the song. Paul, had a little bit of a song that never led to completion, but it fit in the middle here, with some orchestration to blend the two.
Ringo, John, Paul and George Martin as well as Mal Evan (roadie) all played the low C note on the piano and the tracks were overlapped to extend it out longer than pianos normally vibrate.
"Turn you on" was getting people to try acid
This is raw genius! Welcome to the family, my friend.
The vocals going from one side to the other was always a part of the mix from the beginning.
The beatles loooved doing weird shit in the studio, but that section where the piano chords are simultaneously getting more intense but quieter, is so unsettling lmao 5:20
also, your face at 5:45 is perfect.
I agree
Too bad you are unsettled. Widen your musical horizons a bit, and you'll find a whole universe of other music out there that will change your perspective.
@@glass2467 whaaat? No man, unsettled is a good thing, it means that section was extremely effective - I've been a musician since the early 90s - when you can elicit an emotion regardless of your opinion of its positivity or negativity, you won.
@@NotBenCoultry That's what I'm saying. Music can express so much more than what the average listener expects from music. Many listeners get "unsettled" by anything that's outside of their comfort zone. But they might not want music to unsettle them, so that's as far as they go. I recommend going further into it.
ruclips.net/video/vbHMgqHtAy0/видео.html
I don't know what an analog is but I know I'm named after Paul McCartney. I'm supposed to be a boy so I'm here for it good evening
The Analogues are a Beatles cover band. Not a 'tribute' band, so to speak, because they have various musicians (about 7 or 8 of them). Highly recommend, though.
I find that final chord terrifying.
That chord still ringin somewhere
Yup, along with everything the human race has broadcast, sweeping out 'Across the universe' as radio signals.
Stereo was still a relatively new toy when this was recorded, and they were playing with that toy, landscaping where they wanted you to hear the sounds they were creating. They were panning to create musical effects that were unknown or untried at that time.
Pycodellic song.they were in that area
Pycodellic - Having eaten too many pies at the delicatessen.
The vocal panning is intentional, and from the original production.
Dude, the mix is original. When this was released it was early days for stereo LP records. A lot of music was still released in mono in the 60s.
So, there was some radical mixing done with the new technology. People experimented with it. We loved listening to the separation of tracks with headphones. For me, the trippiest recording was Whole Lotta Love by Led Zeppelin. We absolutely loved that when it was first released.
The last part was in the end groove of the record. It wasn't part of the actual song. It was a fun thing that would repeat over and over until the needle was lifted from the record.
2:43 I believe groups re-master their songs because at a certain point (say twenty years) the rights to the music reverts to the original artist from the label. But the original recording (would still be owned by the label).
You asked what was that...well it was 1960's drug induced chaos lol, but i love that song!!
PS-really looking forward to this one!!!
YAY!!!!😊
You’re having a mare , this is the beginning’s of all music you know.
The guy over at Wings of Pegasus says these days remastered on youtube means run through auto tune. In 40 years of hearing this song I've never heard those vocals have tremelo like I just heard.
In 7 years of recording The Beatles produced more brilliance than others could in a lifetime. They were a major pivot point in music only equaled by the likes of Bach, Mozart and Beethoven. The Beatles sit alone in the rock era looking down from the mountain at everybody else. As far as bands go, they are at the ludicrous level.
That last bit of noise I don't think is considered part of the song. Anyway it is a weird song but I love the variety of the Beatles, you NEVER know what you're gonna get
It's two songs from Paul and John (unrelated) and George Martin put it together. IT IS THEIR BEST SONG
It's a great song but it's not their best song
The Beatles figured out how to put it together, not George Martin.
There is a more recent release that is remastered but also newly remixed - gone is the hard panning, and the mix has more punch -
I like it a bit better-
There’s also an earlier version of this on that remix/remaster
where the last chord, rather than piano, is the four of them humming the chord - great in a different way
As a Beatles fan of 60+ years I apologize for this jerk's pinned comment. I am not a fan of hip hop but the song clearly affected you. It is, in fact, a true masterpiece. Keep digging into The Beatles the were on a whole different level and changed everything including modern classical music. The were also charming and funny and just magical. Welcome to the family, my friend!
More beatles pls
"My Mind has been Psycodalazied" 🤣😂
"What in the world was that?" you say? Can you imagine the poor people in 1967 hearing this for the first time? They would have been at least as confused about this as you are, likely more so, as you have the benefit of both technology and hindsight! It was a very different world indeed back then. . . .
I'm riding with ya Mugs!...Keep it up Bro
Back in the 60s, when stereo recording was first becoming a thing, groups like the Beatles liked to mess around in the studio and have the vocals and different instruments coming through their own separate channel. When listening on stereo speakers it can give the illusion that an invisible band is performing in your living room. The singer is in that corner, the trumpet player is over there, etc. It's not as effective when listening on headphones. Stereo recording was meant to fill a room with what sounded like live music. People were fascinated by stereo music back in the day.
The sound bouncing between the headphones is the way it was heard by us back then, too. It was the days of early stereo and early headphones. Most albums had songs meant to swing the music from ear to ear to take advantage of the new technology. Led Zeppelin did it all the time. We would look for those tunes on the album. Good bong songs because we all had headphones on and plugged into the receiver.
Great review. Enjoy the Beatles.
Just me as a Beatles fan, have to vote for this as much better.
Vocals are supposed to be separated. The entire song is the dichotomy of life. Logical vs. Artistic. Daily routine vs. The big picture. Introversion vs. Extroversion. Left Brain vs. Right Brain. John is singing into your left ear, which travels to your right brain half, which is in charge of emotions and color and art. Paul is singing to your right ear, which travels to the left brain half, which is responsible for logic, math, tabulation, and routine.
The panning was original. Stereo was a new toy back then.
And all four Beatles were sitting at four separate pianos at the end of the song and had to do a number of takes before they all hit the chord simultaneously, and with the microphone at full volume, they held the chord to silence. Well, almost. If you listen carefully at the end of the chord, you can actually hear the squeak of a chair because the microphone volume is so high. Nonetheless, one of many brilliant parts that goes together to make this amazing song!
The beetles started their career recording in mono by the time we got to this stereo had been invented a lot of stuff from this era used stereo effects placing different instruments or vocals either to the left or right of Centre and sometimes panning the audio left to right you have already listened to a lot of music from this era that did the same it was done for impact and artistic affect.
Taking advantage of the 'stereo' effect, the engineers developed sound separations that were referred to as "imaging". The idea is that closing your eyes you can imagine where the separate artist are in the room. The first vocalist may be on the left. The hamonies are coming from the right and the guitar may be in the middle. Led Zepplein, Pink Floyd and many other used this approach on all their albums. Music (particularly White music) is often for the head to digest and not for the ass to bounce. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereo_imaging
Some of the hard left and right panning of the 60's and 70's was creative, and sometimes the result of limitations of the recording process, only 4 track recorders being available. The Beatles career spans a decade of huge technological change, some of it's innovations directly instigated by them and the production staff at EMI Studios.The BBC national TV and radio channels were broadcast in mono, so if you want to hear the mix they spent their time on it would be those, stereo mixes were still very much a novelty at the time of this album, and a gimmick that might not take off with the general public, not many had any stereo equipment, it was mostly jazz and classical music that was given this treatment. As technology has developed over the decades since, there are now various remasters and remixes that have been made. Relatively recently Giles Martin (son of The Beatles original producer George Martin) has remixed most of their albums and singles, and addressed the stereo positioning of vocals and instruments more in line with modern expectations. Although purist fans will argue over which releases are their own personal favourites, as there is now a very wide range of alternatives to choose from, making it a bit of a minefield for first reaction channels to pick which version to use.
One of my favorites. React to Wes Montgomery's version, if you play jazz, but for sure more Beatles.
Glad you heard the inner groove. That went on until you lifted off the tonearm. The end of one of the top albums in music history. The orchestra buildup is (was to ears at the time) a psychedelic sonic peek beyond the ego - an audio finger pointing at the vastness beyond us. "I'd Love To Turn You On" was about expanding your mind. I think many people heard it that way back then. I know I did.
I wish they'd clip that end piece off digital copies. It's a vinyl trick that makes no sense without the record.
I don't think that last bit belongs as part of A day in the life. It was a separate "track" in the runoff groove. If you had a fairly aggressive auto-changer you never got to hear it. With a manual turntable it went on playing till you picked up the tone arm.
Certainly not a recording expert, but typically the Beatles re-mastering was simply for clarity. They were only using 4 track analogue tape recorders in 1967 when recording this song, so that technology had its limits. As for the vocals to one side. . .this is classically the way they recorded their music with this technology, and I'm guessing they wanted to preserve that in this re-mix.
the Beatles did the left/right vocals on purpose on the orig albums!👌👍✌😁
You may not have seen it yet but this is a turning point in rock history 1967. And now, check Jeff Beck's cover 2010 of the same song live at Ronnie Scott's
Ironic that Beck would cover it considering he dismissed the album when it was first released
The Analogues are unlike any other cover band -- they use all the original instruments and amps (same brand and model, not the actual same ones), and create a note-for-note version of the songs. They focus on the songs the Beatles made in the studio years, bringing orchestral instruments, sitar, harp onstage -- whatever is needed. Except for Revolution 9 and the orchestra build-up in this song, it's all done live onstage. In my opinion they would be just amazing to see live, and it's great to watch their videos, but their sound recordings are so instrumentally close to the Beatles, while their vocals are not, they're not a great listen and you're better off just listening to the Beatles.
Listen to the remix for a modern mix of the song. The remaster from 2009 kept it the same as the original
I believe I get high with a Little Help from My Friends on here the Joe Cocker song you covered my favorite song on here is Lucy in the Sky
John left ear, Paul in the right ear. Not a mistake and no changes in the remaster that changed it. Style choice.
crescendo, vn v longest recorded held note in musical historey, acidentely. alway found vis song facinating.
Prog is now
"That" is called marijuana, lol. Great reaction.
No, it would be blasphemy to move them from their original panned positions, which was pioneering and groundbreaking at the time, and move it instead to what we are more used to with a majority of stuff, where they need to be at or near the center. The Beatles were experimental in so many ways, and stereo was really just becoming a thing, and so they were pushing the boundaries and it thrilled people.
One way you might understand it is when a lot of people from a rock background dive into studio engineering for hip hop, they are astonished to find that the kick drum or the 808 boom or whatever can be anywhere in the mix, and there can be multiple of them, some center but maybe one way off to the side, one up high in the mix; it just seems to defy everything we've ever known, which is that the kick drum should always be low and totally centered. It's just about creativity given the situation at the time.
I honestly have to say that, at least through headphones, they mangled the hell out of that song. The main elements, vocal, bass and drums, are all way too separated during the verses. John's voice needs to be front and center, not so isolated in the left.
Not to me. I enjoy stereo separation. When I record, I like to do the vocals on one channel or the other. Sometimes I have keyboards and vocals on one channel, and guitar on the other.
The 2009 remaster left the 1967 George Martin 4-track mix in place. The recent 2017 remasters by Giles Martin started afresh with the soundstage and in my opinion is a far better mix than this one.
It’s a shame you never had a chance to get with George Martin to help fix the engineering.
Imagine how good they could’ve been.
Sensational Alex Harvey Band - Amos Moses ruclips.net/video/dgTUvJv9MP8/видео.html
The Sensational Alex Harvey Band Sharks Teeth ruclips.net/video/_BT4nafu-II/видео.html
The Sensational Alex Harvey Band framed live 1974 ruclips.net/video/YRbfFZnJZYQ/видео.html
The Sensational Alex Harvey Band - Midnight Moses. ruclips.net/video/7PorTxFQKRY/видео.html
The Sensational Alex Harvey Band - The Faith Healer ruclips.net/video/kR63tbQXGT8/видео.html
The Sensational Alex Harvey Band the man in the jar ruclips.net/video/SNiAY-AfaK4/видео.html
The Sensational Alex Harvey Band - Jungle Rub Out ruclips.net/video/AvIxwQonj4I/видео.html
The Sensational Alex Harvey Band - $25 for a Massage ruclips.net/video/N7A0C_d-THw/видео.html
The Sensational Alex Harvey Band The Tale Of The Giant Stoneater ruclips.net/video/q0vXpi_Ruhk/видео.html
The Sensational Alex Harvey Band Boston tea party ruclips.net/video/qTycpX72vyA/видео.html
The Sensational Alex Harvey Band Give My Compliments To The Chef ruclips.net/video/n-nosdSTqEE/видео.html
The Sensational Alex Harvey Band - Tomahawk Kid ruclips.net/video/wequ74gSumg/видео.html
The Sensational Alex Harvey Band Next ruclips.net/video/wB9t9bcgQnk/видео.html
The Sensational Alex Harvey Band - Isobel Goudie ruclips.net/video/vtKCJAlkFA4/видео.htmlsi=zOxiTKB49pFPVdo2
The Sensational Alex Harvey Band Swampsnake ruclips.net/video/_uC13XXzrAI/видео.html
The Sensational Alex Harvey Band - Water Beastie ruclips.net/video/27qbD4oHkj0/видео.html
The Sensational Alex Harvey Band The Dolphins ruclips.net/video/F6YBqx22bJo/видео.html
I did go through a Beatles phase. I haven't listened to the Beatles in 30 years.
If I remember correctly, the vocals were panned back and forth in the original recordings. I'm old enough to have owned the originals, still have them but they are unlistenable.
Open your mind to other artistic ways of doing things. Everything doesn't have to fit into your preconceived ways of appreciating music. This is a masterpiece and was ground breaking. I think it's still ground breaking, because music has fallen backwards in many ways, and thus today's listener's perspective has become smaller. Just my opinion.
ruclips.net/video/vbHMgqHtAy0/видео.html
Giles Martin (George Martin's son) compared re-mastering and re-mixing as the difference between detailing a car (spiffing it up) and breaking a car down to its components and building it up again.
But I am no expert in sound mixing or cars. I am just grateful that you did not use that horrible video to accompany your reaction, as so many reactors do. Much better to just listen to the song as those of us who grew up with this music did, sans video!
Oh wow! This is only 21 hours old! You picked a masterpiece here! Many say this is the Beatles greatest song! However, you'd have an argument on your hands whenever you try to call out either the Beatles greatest song or greatest album. Their musical body of work is like that!
PEOPLE 'COVER' CUZ THE ORIGINAL NAILS IT ... ALWAYS STICK TO THE ORIGINAL ... GOOD CALL! THE ORIGINAL PANNED
Slow burn
No issue with a Beatles Masterpiece. I always prefer the original version of the song to the remastered version…
I'm not a fan of most re-mastered music. If the vocals are on one side, it's for a reason. After decades of listening to music out of one speaker, artists wanted to use stereo sound to its full potential. IMO, no one did it better than The Beatles or Pink Floyd.
Remastered means to screw the whole thing up
Listen to the REMIXES not the REMASTERS to get much better audio panning and mixing.
I'm certainly no musician, but to my experience, The Beatles music doesn't need to be remastered.
Think out of the box a bit.
Sargent Peppers Hart Club Band!
It this same as always
You cannot not like this.
That sounded too fast
Don't use re-mastered version of songs, they are almost always inferior to the original.
AMEN!!!
@@snakeinthegrass7443 The only exception I would make would be for Led Zeppelin songs. Jimmy Page remastered many of them himself, and they are improvements over the originals.
A final chord is your comment. So lame.
I think this song is dated but it did spawn copy cats. Beatles were into experimentation especially in the middle period. Day in the life is a favorite of many devotees of the Beatles. I'm a Beatles fan but less so of this song,, which I consider more of a novelty piece.
If you weren't sure what to make of that you should listen to some old school Pink Floyd with Sid Barrett. Maybe "careful with that axe Eugene ' or "several furry species gathered together in a cave grooving with a pick!?" But here's some good ones if you haven't already done them. Just suggestions "let him roll" or "the randall knife' by Guy Clark or "if I could only fly" by Blaze Foley. "Rex's blues" Townes Van Zandt "it makes no difference" the band "ragged old truck " Billy Joe Shaver