SAUCONY ENDORPHIN PRO+ vs. PUMA DEVIATE NITRO ELITE SP | Between Two Shoes

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 ноя 2024
  • СпортСпорт

Комментарии • 25

  • @GGori_99
    @GGori_99 3 года назад +4

    Puma has been so great with their styles decision on the Nitro shoes.. i hope they would not change too much or not change at all in the future.. right amount of stack height.. nice upper.. nice midsole.. nice outsole..

  • @RobertHarridge
    @RobertHarridge 3 года назад +8

    According to Puma, SP stands for Spectrum, like a light spectrum, it produces all different colors, hence the colorway.

    • @russellbutt1553
      @russellbutt1553 3 года назад +2

      *Spectra

    • @Believeintherun
      @Believeintherun  3 года назад

      You are correct and at one point we knew this. Too many specs in our brains!

  • @caroselangelomalinis7463
    @caroselangelomalinis7463 2 года назад +3

    I hope you do a vid like this for Asics Edge+ vs Saucony Endorphin Pro 3. Thanks for these vids!

  • @KoIhara
    @KoIhara 3 года назад +2

    Puma’s bet on Molly Seidel must be paying off - I hope they sell tons of these Deviate shoes. But, Endorphin Pro’s so good

  • @gpersonaltrainer
    @gpersonaltrainer Год назад +1

    I've tested both at the running track. Well, I'm a Saucony guy, but these Pumas have literally smoked the Pro +. Feel free to watch my video.

  • @leonal2680
    @leonal2680 3 года назад +2

    The Puma shoe is Nitrogen-infused Pebax

  • @jeroen1989
    @jeroen1989 3 года назад +2

    SP mostly stands for special performance...

  • @fabi8731
    @fabi8731 3 года назад +4

    BUT!: the Puma is impossible to buy anywhere in Europe, whereas I could get my hands on the Saucony for roughly 200 quit already

  • @SuperAloeFresh
    @SuperAloeFresh 3 года назад

    The puma is still not on their site. It’s still sold out

  • @nathus7993
    @nathus7993 Месяц назад

    The puma have peba form

  • @jeffdover6845
    @jeffdover6845 3 года назад +2

    Actually puma is sold out

    • @Believeintherun
      @Believeintherun  3 года назад

      They were there at some point, for quite a short time apparently

  • @moreybrown870
    @moreybrown870 3 года назад +3

    Short answer: Molly would have won Gold in a Vaporfly or Endorphin Pro.

    • @arkamukhopadhyay9111
      @arkamukhopadhyay9111 2 года назад

      Molly is great for an American, but a few light years behind the average African runner, so nah, she wouldn't have.

    • @moreybrown870
      @moreybrown870 2 года назад +2

      @@arkamukhopadhyay9111 molly was 10 seconds shy of silver and 26 seconds behind the winner, Peres Jepchirchir. That’s 1 sec per mile difference. I’ve never run in her Puma’s but I run in the other two- and the difference they make is way more than that.

    • @arkamukhopadhyay9111
      @arkamukhopadhyay9111 2 года назад

      @@moreybrown870 Her PB is 2:22. There are I think around 50 African women with sub 2:20 PBs. You were saying?

    • @moreybrown870
      @moreybrown870 2 года назад +2

      @@arkamukhopadhyay9111 I'm not saying that Molly is the best in the world. I was saying that on that given day (Tokyo Olympics, very hot marathon conditions), with the competition she had on that day- it may have been a very different race if Molly were wearing potentially more efficient shoes. Molly is still young- she hasn't run her fastest marathon yet.

    • @arkamukhopadhyay9111
      @arkamukhopadhyay9111 2 года назад

      @@moreybrown870 Jepchirchir and Kosegei were both in Nikes, if I'm not wrong, so still don't think Molly having them would have made any difference.

  • @bigshotz1240
    @bigshotz1240 3 года назад +1

    Lmao, widely available?