My Take On The Washington Post Cancelling Our Interview & The State Of The Media
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 фев 2025
- The Washington Post cancelled our interview scheduled for 10am today to discuss further the hit piece against me, and I talk about the state of the media these days.
Watch the full episode of Barstool Radio here: • Dave Portnoy Went on t...
Follow me here:
Facebook: / stoolpresidente
Twitter: / stoolpresidente
Instagram: / stoolpresidente
Tik Tok: www.tiktok.com... 
Развлечения
Watch the full episode of Barstool Radio here: ruclips.net/video/SRsuBqLN2AY/видео.html
By not suing... you're part of the problem today. Very sad.
David I love the way u phone this rat up and told her straight lad ha and the press are scum bags who lie lie and lie fake news
@@NickCager0
@@NickCager By victim blaming and shaming, it is you who are the enabler, problem, and MSM bootlicker. Neat flex and solid projection though.
That's not grey area, that's defamation. Her response shows malice and recklessness which is the biggest hurdle for defamation.
She got caught and lied her face off...we all knew she was grossly insincere!
That Washington Compost is comprised of some really nasty hateful individuals.
*psilocybin
Of course they canceled. This was an attempt to strip Dave’s sponsors by threatening them with bad press if they didn’t drop him. Despicable
Well they didn’t cancel they tried to reschedule the time…. I think Dave self snitched a little bit and maybe opened out a light on his participation in these WWE- esque conroversies. He benefits from dragging this out and painting his narrative same as the Washington post so ehh idk
EXACTLY BUT she they didn’t know he would find out about it 🤣🤣🤣
@@AlexThompson-fq3kkThat’s gaslighting
@@AlexThompson-fq3kkbull crap. She’s delaying to get in front of the interview with the story. Portnoy loses the chess game if the story comes out first.
so faking true. Same shit over, "and over"
He established the following with his first call:
1. She lied (she labeled him a misogynist in the approach).
2. She is disingenuous, “I am in the exploring phase.” “But you put that as a fact about me. It doesn’t seem like it’s still in exploring phase, but rather you established this.” “You didn’t even talk to me.” “I was going to ask tomorrow!” “Yeah but the article comes out Friday. It will be written by then!” “No!”
3. She is manipulative, “well it’s a technique to force them to respond.”
4. She is ruthless/sociopathic, “you realize you can hurt my business and all the things that benefit from the festival. You are hurting people.” “Well I’m trying to write an article and that’s what matters to me.”
So, Dave, you should take a shot a journalism! Rent a full page ad in the biggest competitor. The ad should be your own investigative journalism piece regarding the integrity and ethics of this journalist. Include all the quotes, established facts and a website address to see the video.
Also, you should approach all of the Washington Post advertisers demanding they answer about how they feel doing business and supporting an organization who lacks ethics, is manipulative and sociopathic.
agreed
They are not reporters, they are activists.
Hacktivists
And controlled by the CIA, like all other corporate media, thus all outlets always have the same talking points and verbiage.
And always asthetically hideous, bitter and brimming with h. At ered.
The modern day 'not cees' who call us that 😂
Like Dave, go figure.
@@Mat-fw1kyBTW that's already a word, it means computer hackers who hack as a form of activism.
Them canceling came as a shock to absolutely nobody. Majority of media outlets are opinionated, rude, and classless shitheads.
Also low IQ
Wset 13 Lynchburg va is a prime example of shitty news media.
None of them though, are as bad as the Washington Compost. A terrible group of haters.
Where do you think that shithead owner of that pizza joint in Massachusetts who went into hysterics about Portnoy visiting his business formulated his opinion from? None other then online leftist rags like MYT and WaPo.
These people need to be dealt with in a legal and non violent way.
I really love that Dave checked the media, finally someone respectfully pushes back and exposes “hit piece” negative journalism. Dave for the win!
I don’t understand why someone like Dave doesn’t hire his own Investigators to dig up dirt on some of these journalists.
Seriously should talk to Stu and get a PI guy, no way all these people are all “holier than thou”
Because not everyone gets off on childish nonsense
"Digging up dirt" is absolutely happening by Dave's lawyers. It just won't be turned into tabloid. I'm sure he's playing the long (legal) game. He's probably not interested in 3 word "gotcha"moments and cheap insults. More like defamation and misrepresentation case and millions of dollars, then the gotcha moments because it's Dave after all. Be patient.
ive always wondered that....get a group, get some serious money together and hire a team of investigators and unleash them on these bastards,,,
@@randallrhoads3271 You think that doesn’t happen already? Of course the rich and powerful try to dig up dirt on and harass journalists they don’t like. The Post has security people and legal teams to help their journalists deal with that stuff
Everyone knows as soon as she said can we continue this tomorrow, she was just brushing you off. So cancellation or a no show was expected.
@@Blue_Collar_Hero what??
@@atrain132its essentially what she did to dave kinda like an eye for an eye kinda deal
@atrain132 He saying, that if she is going to defame Dave, then Dave should defame her and accuse her of things she never actually did. Ever heard of "equal rights = equal fights"?
@@brucej.willson4764 yeah, I know. It's just a weird ass comment.
Excellent handling of this situation Dave. You gave the reporter FAR more leeway than anyone else would and as expected, she folded.
💯agree
Well most people aren’t rapists/misogynistic bigots
@@shootthechit I shouldn’t have to tell you, but yeah, that’s dave
@@shootthechit I’ll have to get in line, and you’ll need to read the first 3 that were already written. Lol like ya know they exist buddy
As soon as I heard her say can we talk tomorrow, I knew 100% without uncertainty that there would be no talk lolol
She needs to be sued for defamation. That’s the only way these scumbags change. Accountability!!!!!
He couldn't win that case or he would.
@@jackiehedges320 I don't see how this is not defamation, They are saying that he is a misogynistic person, and has a pattern of problematic behavior. These are both claims, that are in the letter and article, she asserts to be true. Then in the phone call, she admits that she doesn't know that those are true, and she only said them to get a response from sponsors. Then Dave asks why did you not talk to me before the article was published, she did not answer him on that question, saying I want to talk to you tomorrow. But that is too late, because the article will already be out there, and the damage will have been done. If this was a fair article, they would back up their claims with evidence, and would give him a fair chance to responds to that evidence. They did not, and therefore I think Dave could argue defamation because this is not a fair article, and people who will read that without context or doing researching for themselves, will now think Dave is a misogynistic person, with a pattern of problematic behavior.
@@D4BadRecordsit’s grey area with American journalism. He would likely spend so much time in the lawsuit it would not be worth it
Tortious interference
I didn't read the article bc you have to sign up for the wp and fk that, but according to the quoted email, she said "Dave portnoy, WHOS BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH..." That makes all the legal difference. It's been said before so they will just say she's not the one who said it.
Bro sue those haters. Their job is to portray the truth not pretend your mistakes are the best way to describe you.
This is all a work, guy.
He would lose, the wording of the journalist was not direct enough to rise to the level of defamation
@@lilloneson defamation maybe he will lose but not tortious interference.
Depends on what gets published completely. They're opening themselves to a lawsuit, if they do continue down a path of negligent public portrayal, if they support their opinions with organized and structured means of malicious intent without source of truth. In civil tort law, it's not beyond reasonable doubt; rather evidence and relying on supported substantial malintent. Was the intent outright damaging? Was the piece reasonably supported by the facts? Was the piece reasonably giving the impression towards others/public that negatively impact Dave without any truth, attempts to pursue truth; the arguable definition of what is reasonably "truth".
Intent and reason are the two most commonly repeated terms in both civil law and criminal law, because they are the two biggest factors towards defining legal language. These terms are constantly battling sides of roughly drawn grey lines, as laws are never just cut and dry definitions based on their language. Precedence exists because of this, otherwise new issues would not impact prior outcomes whatsoever. Thus, how reasonable the Post was to defend their position, how reasonable they were in offensively damaging Dave and Barstool by a malicious structured means, and how reasonable an opinion a public reader, customer, or partner of Dave/BS would form based on the piece, are the overarching issues at hand, followed first by the level of intent.
@@Platerpus7 lmao, so doing journalism is considered tortious interference now?
Let me spread the word
It’s really time to start sueing individuals/corporations etc that are running hit pieces, and running cancellation campaigns. Dave has a real opportunity here, to set a precedent and keep these people on their toes. I would go for it…
Lot of legal fees just for a defamation lawsuit. Washington Post has deeper pockets unfortunately
Lawyers would love it.
He has no case. It would be funny to watch him try, though. It would most likely be dismissed, just like Trump’s defamation case against the Post was
I think that's just another form of free speech suppression. It's time people vote with their wallets and stop reading bad activist "journalists." The Washington Post is already tanking. They've been laying off people for 2 years, their subscription numbers are down massively, there are rumblings Bezos wants to sell the paper. I was a subscriber at one point, I am a liberal, I stopped reading the paper when it became clear they'd become a rag.
@@dr.badass702And people are going apeshit on the DiFara post.
Yo bro, i ain't gon watch this clip, but just so you know, we appreciate you and i watched you on the phone with the lady that you called out and politic-talked you into not admitting what you caught her on live for us to see. Do more of that when they side step you, and know that we have your back. The world is a better place with you in it, so thank you. Keep doing you and let the losers do them. Winners gotta be winners bro. Luv your honesty and reviews bro!
honestly sounds like, they were hoping to get a sponsor to cancel under the threat of a negative article. Then reach out to you for comment on sponsor dropping your event. Self fulfiling hit piece. When they couldn't get a sponsor to drop the event they moved your interview back to give themselves more time.
Headline would have been “sponsors pull out of Portnoy event due to misogynistic past” and then the article would have been just full on smear.
The biggest sin in journalism is to insert yourself into the story. True journalism is dead and buried.
@@sherileigh792 Matt Taibbi is one of the only good ones left
Self fulfilling hit piece is a beautifully worded description. Its how journalists/news nudges culture in specific directions
The WAPO reporter researched Dave's net worth and they realized a lawsuit brewing so the gig is up. Good work Dave !
Yup, she defamed Dave to a sponsor and admitted in a recorded call that it was a deliberate and calculated lie. WaPo's lawyers (and everyone else) becoming aware of this made a follow-up call absolutely impossible. Especially with dave mentioning tortious interference in the call.
I truly enjoyed your call to the Washington Post reporter. There was obviously no news story or professional journalism conducted. However, there was a blatant attempt to discourage your event sponsors. As expected she canceled the interview. It's a damn that this behavior is an example of so called journalism.
I’m a survivor of S/A n love dave. Ive been so emotionally invested in this story and hope he finds his peace and people treat him with as much love as he puts out.
it's awesome that you have aired everything and streamed, no way she can spin it and lie about her interaction with you.
The only way to shut them up with the lies is to sue the, for millions. Just sue them!
She kept saying I would like to have a conversation with you while having a conversation with him. Anyone with half a brain understands what that means
No surprise she punked out, Dave. You scared her yesterday. And props for the "Don't give up the ship" flag. The last words of Capt James Lawrence during the war of 1812. And word to live by!
This is why women shouldn't be in this position, or have a career. Every man intimidates them when they think they're being courageous and brave. They cower in fear. The world is so inverted after urging women to have careers.
It looks like she double booked. She was probably interviewing Dragon Pizza at 11am.
I think you should sue for defamation. They constantly go far unpunished. They need to finally feel the consequences for their irresponsible journalism
Not possible
Congrats Dave!! Standing up to this clown world is exactly what has to happen. "Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth." -- Mike Tyson
This clown world that says raping women is bad
@@Astro-J hahahahaha
youtube is so partisan i am surprised this was on my suggested page. Great Win Dave.
Respect David. Opening our eyes even further to this cancel culture crap. Like with Rumble today and Russell Brand
Russell brand gonna need to explain those text messages before I call his cancellation unreasonable.
He’s an actual bad person so stop enabling them
The WP lawyers nixed this 100%. Id still investigate a possible lawsuit.
Yeap. They wouldn't hesitate to sue. He can do it for us if he doesn't want to do it for him. It's not about him. It's about the point.
@@iwalkincircles2960 I think he's hesitant because he already tried to sue Wall Street Journal and lost because of the old articles that were written about him. Super hard to win a lawsuit against "news" publications even if you're right.
Nothing sue about
@@griffen5748 good point. Definitely depends on who resides over the case also.
Portnoy is an ABSOLUTE legend! 💯
‘I’m King Kong of Pizza’.....😂FACTS!!
Of course she canceled. She doesn't want the truth to interfere with her hatchet job article. How people can call themselves journalists is beyond me.
She's not a journalist. She's used as the face of these slanderous articles so that men who are being attacked in the media must be respectful to them because they're a female. But if you notice there's always a "man" i.e. simp or homosexual that's over them telling these females what to do.
Good for you Dave. You handled that like the pro you are. You have a lot of stones. My compliments.
This is the end for the fools in the mainstream media industry. The clown show will eventually come to an end, the people have awakened! Thank-you so much Dave and keep safe!
I can't think of single soul who actually read the Compost's stuff. No one!
We can only hope…
The media is out if control.
I feel like I could tell from the moment she realized it was you on the phone she immediately went into the tactic of trying to schedule a formal phone call and get you off the phone. You're giving her way too much benefit of doubt.
The laws on recording vary from state to state. Where I live, so long as you are a participant in the conversation, you don't need the other person's permission or knowledge to record. Also known as 1 party consent law. Might be useful depending on which state you find yourself in when these issues arise.
Wow great advice i hope his lawyers read your comment quickly.
@@Bigredwillol if his laywers are actually worth their salt they would already know this
Lol great work on exposing the washington post reporter. That woman was a coward
Get em Dave!! Good luck with the event Saturday!
The lawyers made her cancel. Good job Dave!
Been watching your Pizza shorts and now after this hit pice. Subscribed to channel and now a supporter. Not a slice but the whole damn pie support
One bite, this guy does not know the rules.
I would be shocked if the article came out now that Dave posted the call and is talking about it. If they tried the whole "we reached out to him for comment but received no response" people know its a blatant lie. They were never going to contant him to begin with.
You have good grounds for a defamation lawsuit. Or start contacting their advertisers spreading disinformation about them.
No he doesn’t. Tortious interference he does.
He won't do anything except use this for views, engagement, and cold hard cash.
@@Platerpus7People like you spread misinformation. Stop. You’re not even close to being close to being close to being close to correct.
@@Platerpus7 At least try to be close
@@cwg73160it’s textbook tortious interference. It’s not textbook defamation. Get your facts right buddy guy.
He said it so many times I started thinking maybe I was wrong about that word. 😂😂😂
Keep fighting the good fight Dave
Clearly a secondary market being born in journalism. The “new”
Journalism. Which could be the old principles. Just being done 😭 the market moves!
This is journalism today. No readership leads to, no ad revenue, and that leads to, Change in ownership. Being proactive was a master move. 10 Fuck Yeas to team Portnoy. Well done.
WOW. I watch Kenji Alt all the time! I had no idea that guy was a slimeball. No more of him for me.
I can’t believe how a lot of these media companies haven’t been sued for defamation it boggles my mind
The reason there’s so few lawsuits against these media companies that blatantly and provably lie, is because the criteria for defamation includes malice. It’s hard to prove they lied out of malice (meaning the motivation for the lie, was to harm the person they lied about).
Caught her off guard, she tried to talk her way out of it. Never had any intentions of chatting with you again today. Complete and total fraud.
100%.
She screwed herself and didn't enjoy it 😂😂
She didn't know that you would have aired your conversation with her.
They cancelled because you called them on their bs. So they tucked tall and ran. That woman is a gash. Absolutely no integrity at stinkington post.
That's exactly who rags like WA PO hire. Swamp creatures, groomed, ivy-league stenographers for power.
The complete lack of character and integrity among these Progressives is truly scary to witness. Who the f**k raises these maggots?
24:39 when KFC cuts off Dave before he can give his answer was unreal! New host needed 🛑
He does that shit alllllllllll the time and it's so obvious and stupid. Worse host ever. Can't stop talking about his opinion and how it's more important than everyone else's despite how shitty it is lol
Recently started watching you and I love your shit!
She wasn’t ready to defend her actions. Everyone including businesses will gain the public’s credibility by calling these “journalist” out.
Their lawyers probably shat bricks when they saw that video you uploaded with her email and her admission. She lied on the call then admitted to intentional defamation with reckless disregard for the truth just to provoke a reaction from your sponsor. It was obviously attempted TI and again we don't even know if there was an article. If she'd gotten a sponsor to withdraw then she'd have had something to write about and satisfied that activist itch darkening her soul. The best part here is you farmed her misconduct for content and got more out of it than they ever will. Heck she's now a poster child for the abject state of journalism with that interview on Fox.
Sorry you get treated like this, you deserve so much better Mr.Portnoy. We ALL deserve better from these chumps. simple as.
This is kind of similar to when someone at work tries to devise a narrative to get you fired. She kept saying "pointed" but really meant "defamatory."
This has to start having personal consequences
Greetings from Annapolis, Maryland. I like the "Don't give up the Ship" flag!
Sue her, it’s the only way these grimmy slugs will learn, or they will keep doin it again and again.
He's not going to sue her or the Washington Post because it's his "people".
In all reality, you are right. Her behavior was deliberate. No one will change course unless the negative consequences outweigh the reward of her original intent.
Thanks for sharing this!
Dave calling it mysogenic is actually such a big brain move
Misogynic is an actual word meaning Misogynist
??? What are you getting at??? I was trying to figure out why he was mispronouncing the word because I’m sure he’s heard it before. I’m trying to understand if Dave is playing 4d chess by doing that. If so damn Dave gains much more of my respect for playing their stupid games and using it against them. Dave Portnoy 2024 El Presidente🎉
@@Seedavis397 he wasnt mis pronouncing it. Misogynic is a work.
@@Mvpoker88 oh I thought he was trying to pronounce misogynistic
@@Mvpoker88It is, but the actual word in the email from which he was quoting was ‘misogynistic’
Its no surprise that they cancelled the interview. She was caught off guard when you called her & fumbled her way through the original phone call. Even with her & her colleague on the interview, they would make a mess of it. They cannot with a any level of honesty say that their behaviour was fair or in good faith & they know it. They just don't want themselves on record admitting that they are hacks that call themselves journalists. They were looking for a hit piece but didn't expect the target of the hit piece to actually talk to them. Cowards.
Dave really scared the shit out of WaPo dropping the word „Tortious“
Don’t give up the ship! My dad always said that to me 65 years ago!! I’m 73!
You could tell from the call yesterday that she was shocked you called. She was definitely caught off guard and backtracked alot. You should have known that they were not gonna do it.
Also it's hard to control your temper when the other person is clearly not smart
She thinks she's smart though. In fact, she and her fellow maggots at the Compost think they are morally and intellectually superior to anyone who didn't grow up in their Progressive Elitist World.
You beat them to the punch and called them out plus they clearly denied then back tracked about your point.😂 😆
Dave has truly become the man and El Pres
Ha! I’m a bit of a word person and I’m hitting siri and google trying to get the definition of “misogenic” to no avail 🤣🤣🤣 Got me Dave!
Everyone knows it was always going to be a hit piece.
That's how it works, we come up with words that describe people.
I feel like you should sue in this situation so they stop using that tactic. Isn't it defamation to make up a lie about someone causing them to lose money?
Why would he sue?? Such a dumb take 😂😂
Sue? Tf is wrong with you? Lmao omfg
To set a precedent. These fuckbags will continue this bullshit until they are held accountable. This a much larger issue than what is seen on the surface level. This tactic is used across the board in every aspect of media!
He can't sue for defamation, because journalists are trained day in day out to word things to avoid being sued.
HOWEVER he does have a potential tortuous interference and him saying that phrase "tortuous interference" during the call absolutely must've set off alarm bells at WaPo and give their lawyers a heart attack - because there is definitely basis for a tortuous interference suit.
@@obtuse186 That lawsuit is probably going to be full of twists and turns. There’ll be a lot of complex bends to get around. Nothing straightforward about tortuous interference.
this is a common tactic, journalists have been doing this to Rogan (Spotify), Fox News, and Daily Wire for years
Why the hell is a Food Reporter doing a hit piece?!?
To get someone to read their dogsh*t column.
I'm sending the telephone conversation to a close family member who has massive experience as a reporter and is a graduate of one of the top schools of journalism in the country. Truly, this is an awful and stunning example of journalism gone horribly wrong.
Figures she was trying to just get you off the call rather than actually scheduling a 10am interview. Whenever she mentioned it, I was hoping you'd reply 'Well we're already talking now, so...'
Bad news and portraying people in a negative light gets views. That’s the media today. “Dave gave $50 mil to small business” will not generate views unfortunately. They know that, we know that. But there’s nothing wrong with fighting back. Respect Dave for that
I’m at the point where I just lean into the accusations. When you try to prove yourself virtuous in their eyes, you give them all the power.
Holy shit, I haven't seen a Stacker 2 ad since I was in high school watching rasslin on Spike TV.
That reporter has a potential amazing come back story with a amazing twist and climax. But she wont, cause shes a narcisist.
Recording laws vary by state. Most states only 1 party of the conversation has to be aware that the conversation is being recorded, and it doesn’t matter what the laws are in the other state.
WAPO bomb thrower got caught with her finger in the pooch... she didn't expect to get caught talking to the person she was smearing. ❤️🙏
they put the food reporter on the story. She had no idea what she was getting into lol
It’s funny she cancelled the 10 o’clock appointment, that’s all she could say yesterday on the phone. it’s highlarious..!
Undeniable example of what is wrong with this media world today.
We have no media that is just natural and does black-and-white fair journalism anymore.
I honestly don't know if we ever had real journalism ever.
im a fan of kenji (his cooking books and vids), learned alot from him; he pushed hard for restaurants to stay shut down in cali during covid. started selling more books and left the state. not a fan of his politics. i remember he was doin book signings and forcing everyone to mask etc well after all the mandates ended. he didnt have a father in his home growin up so kind of a cucck
Keep crushing it and forget about any media.
dave’s so cool
I agree!
After you got her and blew up her BS the boss said no go😂HOLD THIS W, DAVE!!
Dave should go on an interview with a show like Jimmy Dore, Tim Pool, or Patrick Bet David.
BOOM! JD destroys stenographers for power. Let's go!
A rogues gallery of media hacks lmao
@@goblin6587 TY for self identifying as an establishment bootlicker. Found the WA PO burner account.
All r words
Ouch and gross. He’s fine.
Come to Sheridan, Wyoming and we can go fly fishing brother… you’re the man. 👊🏽
Just for fun, sue them for defamation to your sponsors. (I have no idea if that's legally possible but it would be sick)
Could tell she was doing her best tap dancing!😂
So Kenji Alt started a crusade against you? I am glad I stopped following him a while back. He sounds like a terminally twitter user.
Can’t wait to read the complaint. Sue ‘em good.
I thought mysogenic was just some new made up thing I haven't heard of yet 😂
I did too lol. I thought it was just a new fancier way of saying it
I’m a dem. I support Dave. Common sense shouldn’t be this hard. That was a massive W Davey. ✌️
The sad thing is Dave votes the same way as the far leftwing Washington Post 😁
And his parents. Remember, his dad consumes all that mainstream media.
Very sad. They eat their own!
Which is nothing to do with individual incidents in everyday life..
He called him a freelance reporter with no office! haha That is cold!