My five cents as an active 747 captain with many years of experience with air traffic controllers worldwide: Situations like this one in San Diego can and will happen again. We are human beings and even the best technology is just a backup. And it will be for a long, long time. Situational awareness is part of our daily life in our cockpits and on the control towers. Fact is: The San Diego air traffic controllers did a very good job in saving the day on this demanding, single runway airport. The pilots reacted in a calm and professional way, too. I would call it a non event. All of us were given a valuable lesson. I hope everyone involved in this incident are back in their jobs without additional training and without inquiry or inspection! It's part of our profession to serve the demanding public and press... Since none of these have a clue about the complexity of aviation, we should not listen to them, at all. To broadcast a "personal opinion" of an "instructor" highlights their (the media) goals. Fact is: The problem was solved excellently by all professionals involved. Would I fly on Southwest or would I fly my jumbojet to San Diego international airport at night in foggy conditions? Yes, of course!! Regards from Switzerland ✈. .
The system worked well and that San Diego international airport may be a dangerous airport, but it's also the most safest airport but it's held a fantastic record for how long it's been in San Diego downtown. Too much fear-mongering going on. I've worked this at this airport for over 35 years. I would know.
My five cents as an active 747 captain with many years of experience with air traffic controllers worldwide: Situations like this one in San Diego can and will happen again. We are human beings and even the best technology is just a backup. And it will be for a long, long time. Situational awareness is part of our daily life in our cockpits and on the control towers. Fact is: The San Diego air traffic controllers did a very good job in saving the day on this demanding, single runway airport. The pilots reacted in a calm and professional way, too. I would call it a non event. All of us were given a valuable lesson. I hope everyone involved in this incident are back in their jobs without additional training and without inquiry or inspection! It's part of our profession to serve the demanding public and press... Since none of these have a clue about the complexity of aviation, we should not listen to them, at all. To broadcast a "personal opinion" of an "instructor" highlights their (the media) goals. Fact is: The problem was solved excellently by all professionals involved. Would I fly on Southwest or would I fly my jumbojet to San Diego international airport at night in foggy conditions? Yes, of course!! Regards from Switzerland ✈. .
As a fellow pilot, it's great to see someone spreading awareness about this. These so-called "aviation experts" are just spreading lies to make people scared of flying.
You are absolutely right. My five cents as an active 747 captain with many years of experience with air traffic controllers worldwide: Situations like this one in San Diego can and will happen again. We are human beings and even the best technology is just a backup. And it will be for a long, long time. Situational awareness is part of our daily life in our cockpits and on the control towers. Fact is: The San Diego air traffic controllers did a very good job in saving the day on this demanding, single runway airport. The pilots reacted in a calm and professional way, too. I would call it a non event. All of us were given a valuable lesson. I hope everyone involved in this incident are back in their jobs without additional training and without inquiry or inspection! It's part of our profession to serve the demanding public and press... Since none of these have a clue about the complexity of aviation, we should not listen to them, at all. To broadcast a "personal opinion" of an "instructor" highlights their (the media) goals. Fact is: The problem was solved excellently by all professionals involved. Would I fly on Southwest or would I fly my jumbojet to San Diego international airport at night in foggy conditions? Yes, of course!! Regards from Switzerland ✈. .
@@brianshaffer7578If people are scared of flying, take a train. If more scared, take a drive. If extremely scared, take a walk. When all else fail, stay home…. People make money while others spend them. Welcome to the world of journalism.
The comments by the flight instructor are wrong. The hold-short lines are an added distance from the runway that controllers and pilots use to provide an increased level of safety. There are controller rules that say they are not allowed to use the runway to land or takeoff when another aircraft has passed the hold-short line. Since the crossing aircraft had not entered the runway when told to stop and the departing aircraft was also told to stop his takeoff, this was “not” a near miss. When controllers make a mistake they can correct the mistake by having the crossing aircraft hold short of the runway and the aircraft on the runway stop the takeoff. If it had been a landing aircraft the controller would have had the landing aircraft go around. These are rare but not uncommon occurrences.
This is also happening at other airports around the country. Usually it seems to be a discrepancy between ground and the tower. I'm not even close to an expert, but I love watching the Reat ATC and VASaviation channels. ruclips.net/video/u-Hh2j-8MxY/видео.html
There is always someone out there willing to overdramatize the potential when an incident occurs. I'm sure the FAA will work to minimize future problems at this airport.
First of all it's called "taxiway" not taxipath. Second it's not called a near miss. There was no "miss" and they didn't even got "near" to each other. Professionals call something like that a runway incursion. Most important question no one asked. Were they both on Tower frequency or was one crew talking to ground control and the other one talking to tower? If they were both on the same freq the incidence raises eybrows about controller training and the situational awareness of both crews involved. If they were on seperate freqs they also need to look at controller training and their local procedures. Just my 2 cents. You had your flightinstructor to comment. Why not ask him for the correct terminology. Journalism at its best.😂
This occurs way too often. I've always known we only have one runway. Why we didn't build a new one when we had chance, I'll never know. I think they need to remove cell phones. I would be tempted to use mine. This is a very high stress job requiring constant vigilance.
There's only 1 runway in San Diego, I believe. How this they mix those up? (and don't assume the lady is in the fault simply becuase it's a lady. the guy could be wrong as well. so wait until the report comes out before passing immediate judgement).
Typically inaccurate, misleading opening sentence, showing typical journalistic ignorance and lack of attention to precisely articulating the truth of a topic: "An aborted takeoff . . . is raising concerns about safety . . . " The aborted takeoff isn't raising concerns about safety; the near miss is. The aborted takeoff was the correct response in the situation and was executed correctly, a critical action among others which avoided disaster. The fact of the aborted takeoff isn't the issue or cause of concern; the circumstances that made the aborted takeoff required in order to avoid a disaster are the issue.
My five cents as an active 747 captain with many years of experience with air traffic controllers worldwide: Situations like this one in San Diego can and will happen again. We are human beings and even the best technology is just a backup. And it will be for a long, long time. Situational awareness is part of our daily life in our cockpits and on the control towers. Fact is: The San Diego air traffic controllers did a very good job in saving the day on this demanding, single runway airport. The pilots reacted in a calm and professional way, too. I would call it a non event. All of us were given a valuable lesson. I hope everyone involved in this incident are back in their jobs without additional training and without inquiry or inspection! It's part of our profession to serve the demanding public and press... Since none of these have a clue about the complexity of aviation, we should not listen to them, at all. To broadcast a "personal opinion" of an "instructor" highlights their (the media) goals. Fact is: The problem was solved excellently by all professionals involved. Would I fly on Southwest or would I fly my jumbojet to San Diego international airport at night in foggy conditions? Yes, of course!! Regards from Switzerland ✈.
KSAN is 17 feet above sea level and getting lower. Start building a causeway extending I-8 about 2-miles offshore with roads and rail that can carry interlocking dolosse, rock, equipment, etc., to build an island from seabed to 100 feet above sea level. Use ships and barges as needed. Also consider extending SR-52 through a tunnel under La Jolla, to the north end of the artificial island to provide a loop for vehicles. Build an airport, hotels, restaurants, bait shops, recreational, artificial reefs, fishing spots, kayaking, SeaWorld2, ... Aircraft noise will be far enough away that wave noise will block it. You have time, do have desire?
My five cents as an active 747 captain with many years of experience with air traffic controllers worldwide: Situations like this one in San Diego can and will happen again. We are human beings and even the best technology is just a backup. And it will be for a long, long time. Situational awareness is part of our daily life in our cockpits and on the control towers. Fact is: The San Diego air traffic controllers did a very good job in saving the day on this demanding, single runway airport. The pilots reacted in a calm and professional way, too. I would call it a non event. All of us were given a valuable lesson. I hope everyone involved in this incident are back in their jobs without additional training and without inquiry or inspection! It's part of our profession to serve the demanding public and press... Since none of these have a clue about the complexity of aviation, we should not listen to them, at all. To broadcast a "personal opinion" of an "instructor" highlights their (the media) goals. Fact is: The problem was solved excellently by all professionals involved. Would I fly on Southwest or would I fly my jumbojet to San Diego international airport at night in foggy conditions? Yes, of course!! Regards from Switzerland ✈. .
@@andrewpowers9443 ATC saves 500 lives, $150 million in aircraft, $400 million in insurance and lawsuits, plus cleanup, investigative costs, and delays to the rest of the flight system, plus audits for everyone involved, and @melovetorun takes a big ol' pull off the meth pipe, cracks his knuckles, and starts posting RUclips comments. Peak humanity right there.
My five cents as an active 747 captain with many years of experience with air traffic controllers worldwide: Situations like this one in San Diego can and will happen again. We are human beings and even the best technology is just a backup. And it will be for a long, long time. Situational awareness is part of our daily life in our cockpits and on the control towers. Fact is: The San Diego air traffic controllers did a very good job in saving the day on this demanding, single runway airport. The pilots reacted in a calm and professional way, too. I would call it a non event. All of us were given a valuable lesson. I hope everyone involved in this incident are back in their jobs without additional training and without inquiry or inspection! It's part of our profession to serve the demanding public and press... Since none of these have a clue about the complexity of aviation, we should not listen to them, at all. To broadcast a "personal opinion" of an "instructor" highlights their (the media) goals. Fact is: The problem was solved excellently by all professionals involved. Would I fly on Southwest or would I fly my jumbojet to San Diego international airport at night in foggy conditions? Yes, of course!! Regards from Switzerland ✈. PS: Yes, I am aware of DEI ...
My god it was hard listening to this reporter
My five cents as an active 747 captain with many years of experience with air traffic controllers worldwide: Situations like this one in San Diego can and will happen again. We are human beings and even the best technology is just a backup. And it will be for a long, long time. Situational awareness is part of our daily life in our cockpits and on the control towers. Fact is: The San Diego air traffic controllers did a very good job in saving the day on this demanding, single runway airport. The pilots reacted in a calm and professional way, too. I would call it a non event. All of us were given a valuable lesson.
I hope everyone involved in this incident are back in their jobs without additional training and without inquiry or inspection! It's part of our profession to serve the demanding public and press... Since none of these have a clue about the complexity of aviation, we should not listen to them, at all. To broadcast a "personal opinion" of an "instructor" highlights their (the media) goals.
Fact is: The problem was solved excellently by all professionals involved.
Would I fly on Southwest or would I fly my jumbojet to San Diego international airport at night in foggy conditions? Yes, of course!!
Regards from Switzerland ✈.
.
👍🏻
Hey I’ve got an idea. How about two people cannot clear the same runway. Just a thought.
It's going to be the scene of a major accident... Dramatic much?! 😂
0:32 Sick drift!
The system worked well and that San Diego international airport may be a dangerous airport, but it's also the most safest airport but it's held a fantastic record for how long it's been in San Diego downtown. Too much fear-mongering going on. I've worked this at this airport for over 35 years. I would know.
My five cents as an active 747 captain with many years of experience with air traffic controllers worldwide: Situations like this one in San Diego can and will happen again. We are human beings and even the best technology is just a backup. And it will be for a long, long time. Situational awareness is part of our daily life in our cockpits and on the control towers. Fact is: The San Diego air traffic controllers did a very good job in saving the day on this demanding, single runway airport. The pilots reacted in a calm and professional way, too. I would call it a non event. All of us were given a valuable lesson.
I hope everyone involved in this incident are back in their jobs without additional training and without inquiry or inspection! It's part of our profession to serve the demanding public and press... Since none of these have a clue about the complexity of aviation, we should not listen to them, at all. To broadcast a "personal opinion" of an "instructor" highlights their (the media) goals.
Fact is: The problem was solved excellently by all professionals involved.
Would I fly on Southwest or would I fly my jumbojet to San Diego international airport at night in foggy conditions? Yes, of course!!
Regards from Switzerland ✈.
.
System worked.
lol this ain’t news.
Us pilots know what’s up. These news stations have nothing good to talk about.
As a fellow pilot, it's great to see someone spreading awareness about this. These so-called "aviation experts" are just spreading lies to make people scared of flying.
You are absolutely right. My five cents as an active 747 captain with many years of experience with air traffic controllers worldwide: Situations like this one in San Diego can and will happen again. We are human beings and even the best technology is just a backup. And it will be for a long, long time. Situational awareness is part of our daily life in our cockpits and on the control towers. Fact is: The San Diego air traffic controllers did a very good job in saving the day on this demanding, single runway airport. The pilots reacted in a calm and professional way, too. I would call it a non event. All of us were given a valuable lesson.
I hope everyone involved in this incident are back in their jobs without additional training and without inquiry or inspection! It's part of our profession to serve the demanding public and press... Since none of these have a clue about the complexity of aviation, we should not listen to them, at all. To broadcast a "personal opinion" of an "instructor" highlights their (the media) goals.
Fact is: The problem was solved excellently by all professionals involved.
Would I fly on Southwest or would I fly my jumbojet to San Diego international airport at night in foggy conditions? Yes, of course!!
Regards from Switzerland ✈.
.
@@brianshaffer7578If people are scared of flying, take a train. If more scared, take a drive. If extremely scared, take a walk. When all else fail, stay home…. People make money while others spend them. Welcome to the world of journalism.
Why two different individual are talking on same Air traffic control should be only one person talking to one Airline
The comments by the flight instructor are wrong. The hold-short lines are an added distance from the runway that controllers and pilots use to provide an increased level of safety. There are controller rules that say they are not allowed to use the runway to land or takeoff when another aircraft has passed the hold-short line. Since the crossing aircraft had not entered the runway when told to stop and the departing aircraft was also told to stop his takeoff, this was “not” a near miss. When controllers make a mistake they can correct the mistake by having the crossing aircraft hold short of the runway and the aircraft on the runway stop the takeoff. If it had been a landing aircraft the controller would have had the landing aircraft go around. These are rare but not uncommon occurrences.
40 years as a flight instructor means he can't get a job at the airlines.
Not EVERY pilot wants a job at the airlines.
This is also happening at other airports around the country. Usually it seems to be a discrepancy between ground and the tower. I'm not even close to an expert, but I love watching the Reat ATC and VASaviation channels. ruclips.net/video/u-Hh2j-8MxY/видео.html
Pretty obvious what/who the problem is!
“It’s going to be the scene of the next Major accident” ok bud
There is always someone out there willing to overdramatize the potential when an incident occurs. I'm sure the FAA will work to minimize future problems at this airport.
Pass the hold line, wings can hit? I assume.
First of all it's called "taxiway" not taxipath. Second it's not called a near miss. There was no "miss" and they didn't even got "near" to each other.
Professionals call something like that a runway incursion.
Most important question no one asked. Were they both on Tower frequency or was one crew talking to ground control and the other one talking to tower? If they were both on the same freq the incidence raises eybrows about controller training and the situational awareness of both crews involved. If they were on seperate freqs they also need to look at controller training and their local procedures.
Just my 2 cents.
You had your flightinstructor to comment. Why not ask him for the correct terminology. Journalism at its best.😂
This occurs way too often. I've always known we only have one runway. Why we didn't build a new one when we had chance, I'll never know. I think they need to remove cell phones. I would be tempted to use mine. This is a very high stress job requiring constant vigilance.
To many SW planes would confuse me also
isn't this an old incident?
There's only 1 runway in San Diego, I believe. How this they mix those up?
(and don't assume the lady is in the fault simply becuase it's a lady. the guy could be wrong as well. so wait until the report comes out before passing immediate judgement).
Typically inaccurate, misleading opening sentence, showing typical journalistic ignorance and lack of attention to precisely articulating the truth of a topic: "An aborted takeoff . . . is raising concerns about safety . . . " The aborted takeoff isn't raising concerns about safety; the near miss is. The aborted takeoff was the correct response in the situation and was executed correctly, a critical action among others which avoided disaster. The fact of the aborted takeoff isn't the issue or cause of concern; the circumstances that made the aborted takeoff required in order to avoid a disaster are the issue.
“We should get paid the same” lol 😂
I've always said that commercial aviation is the canary in the coal mine...
Lindbergh Field is no joke
Just a case of the right hand not knowing what the left hand is doing.
The expert was a tad dramatic in his bullshit conclusions 😂😂
My five cents as an active 747 captain with many years of experience with air traffic controllers worldwide: Situations like this one in San Diego can and will happen again. We are human beings and even the best technology is just a backup. And it will be for a long, long time. Situational awareness is part of our daily life in our cockpits and on the control towers. Fact is: The San Diego air traffic controllers did a very good job in saving the day on this demanding, single runway airport. The pilots reacted in a calm and professional way, too. I would call it a non event. All of us were given a valuable lesson.
I hope everyone involved in this incident are back in their jobs without additional training and without inquiry or inspection! It's part of our profession to serve the demanding public and press... Since none of these have a clue about the complexity of aviation, we should not listen to them, at all. To broadcast a "personal opinion" of an "instructor" highlights their (the media) goals.
Fact is: The problem was solved excellently by all professionals involved.
Would I fly on Southwest or would I fly my jumbojet to San Diego international airport at night in foggy conditions? Yes, of course!!
Regards from Switzerland ✈.
Why were they traveling to the north runway?
New T1 certainly won't add to the already overpacked capacity. Yeesh!
Controllers need to slow down their talking. That 1st call to reject the TO was garbled.
The guy on the phone was a bit melodramatic.
And SD is small!! Wow
What does a near miss have to do with public safety? Who writes this stuff?
Absolutely nothing
Near hit.
DEI equals we all die.
MAGA freak
Close call 😮
Happens all the time, nafink new 'ere 😂😂😂
KSAN is 17 feet above sea level and getting lower. Start building a causeway extending I-8 about 2-miles offshore with roads and rail that can carry interlocking dolosse, rock, equipment, etc., to build an island from seabed to 100 feet above sea level. Use ships and barges as needed. Also consider extending SR-52 through a tunnel under La Jolla, to the north end of the artificial island to provide a loop for vehicles. Build an airport, hotels, restaurants, bait shops, recreational, artificial reefs, fishing spots, kayaking, SeaWorld2, ... Aircraft noise will be far enough away that wave noise will block it. You have time, do have desire?
Do you have 25 billion dollars?
flying is not safe.
DEI Cali.
DEI
Replace those air traffic controllers with AI. Humans can’t do their job right risking lives.
Um ok. You aren’t the brightest are you?
@@Hope4all2she made a critical mistake she does not need your sympathy she needs to be fired
My five cents as an active 747 captain with many years of experience with air traffic controllers worldwide: Situations like this one in San Diego can and will happen again. We are human beings and even the best technology is just a backup. And it will be for a long, long time. Situational awareness is part of our daily life in our cockpits and on the control towers. Fact is: The San Diego air traffic controllers did a very good job in saving the day on this demanding, single runway airport. The pilots reacted in a calm and professional way, too. I would call it a non event. All of us were given a valuable lesson.
I hope everyone involved in this incident are back in their jobs without additional training and without inquiry or inspection! It's part of our profession to serve the demanding public and press... Since none of these have a clue about the complexity of aviation, we should not listen to them, at all. To broadcast a "personal opinion" of an "instructor" highlights their (the media) goals.
Fact is: The problem was solved excellently by all professionals involved.
Would I fly on Southwest or would I fly my jumbojet to San Diego international airport at night in foggy conditions? Yes, of course!!
Regards from Switzerland ✈.
.
Enjoy the replacement workers and breeders
Probably DEI air control.
Well there's the dumbest comment of the day.
@@shipyaad Just facts.
@@melovetorun i like how probably immediately turned into facts
@@melovetorunHere’s a fact: your comment is dumb. All you’re doing is parroting nonsense and not doing that too well, either.
@@andrewpowers9443 ATC saves 500 lives, $150 million in aircraft, $400 million in insurance and lawsuits, plus cleanup, investigative costs, and delays to the rest of the flight system, plus audits for everyone involved, and @melovetorun takes a big ol' pull off the meth pipe, cracks his knuckles, and starts posting RUclips comments. Peak humanity right there.
😮
Stinks of dei.
Racist
My five cents as an active 747 captain with many years of experience with air traffic controllers worldwide: Situations like this one in San Diego can and will happen again. We are human beings and even the best technology is just a backup. And it will be for a long, long time. Situational awareness is part of our daily life in our cockpits and on the control towers. Fact is: The San Diego air traffic controllers did a very good job in saving the day on this demanding, single runway airport. The pilots reacted in a calm and professional way, too. I would call it a non event. All of us were given a valuable lesson.
I hope everyone involved in this incident are back in their jobs without additional training and without inquiry or inspection! It's part of our profession to serve the demanding public and press... Since none of these have a clue about the complexity of aviation, we should not listen to them, at all. To broadcast a "personal opinion" of an "instructor" highlights their (the media) goals.
Fact is: The problem was solved excellently by all professionals involved.
Would I fly on Southwest or would I fly my jumbojet to San Diego international airport at night in foggy conditions? Yes, of course!!
Regards from Switzerland ✈.
PS: Yes, I am aware of DEI ...