I’m a “serious” photographer for work but FUN cameras are why I got into it in the first place, and what I use for my personal al work. Great video 👍🏻 Subscribed.
Interesting video. I’ve just shot my first roll of Tiger 110 in a Lomomatic 110 camera. The results were more consistent than Ed got from the Hanimex although obviously not the same quality as 35mm.
Thanks again for watching. What were you shooting with the Tiger? Did you spot anything interesting with the film as a stock? I couldn't really gauge it from my efforts.
Thanks Ian, and thanks for watching. I think the main culprit is the camera, though those negatives are tiny...wouldn't want to try making a gallery print from one (but then that's not what they're for) 🙂
I’m a “serious” photographer for work but FUN cameras are why I got into it in the first place, and what I use for my personal al work. Great video 👍🏻 Subscribed.
Thanks Jon. Good to hear from someone of “like mind” when it comes to photography! I must check out some of your work. Thanks for subscribing 🙂
Interesting video. I’ve just shot my first roll of Tiger 110 in a Lomomatic 110 camera. The results were more consistent than Ed got from the Hanimex although obviously not the same quality as 35mm.
Thanks again for watching. What were you shooting with the Tiger? Did you spot anything interesting with the film as a stock? I couldn't really gauge it from my efforts.
super Cool
It's seriously underexposing. With a decent 110 camera, you can obtain really good results.
Thanks Ian, and thanks for watching. I think the main culprit is the camera, though those negatives are tiny...wouldn't want to try making a gallery print from one (but then that's not what they're for) 🙂