I wonder why matt is even there in most cases since he rearly say anything, I will assume it is to make it look like kent does not stand alone in his world view or something lol
@@spatrk6634 yea I know that is what said but if thats the case one would think Kent would give him a more of a role in the programming but hey kent works in mysterious ways just like his god
So let me get this right, the flood lays down the layers and compresses them into rock, while simultaneously cutting the rock it is laying down and has not yet solidified? Got it.
Exactly! Was the flood laying down the rock layers or carving them up? Or both at the same time?! And where was this 'evaporation' part of the process for producing rock while under the flood waters? Ken Hovind's explanations are as clear as the mud of his imaginary flood waters. Also, which direction were the flood waters moving? Look at a map of the Grand Canyon and Colorado River - they twist around in all directions. That's one confused flood!
@@DissedRedEngie Point. I'd certainly be concerned if I were stuck in a room with a bloviating creationist. By the way, your profile picture looks like a dapper Mr. Carmen Sandiego, PE. Cheers.
Thunderf00t covered a claim similar to this in his Why Do People Laugh At Creationists series. He said the water would have had to rush through at a speed greater than sound…
As a person who ACTUALLY LIVES next to the dam of the Colorado River, I want to give Kent a pile of loose dirt next to a big chunk of sandstone then ask him to SIMPLY, take a scoop out of each one with his hand. Comedy gold that.
You're nicer than me. I would simply tell him that, if he really believes there's no difference, he shouldn't mind if I whack him in the head with the sandstone.
I poured milk onto my Cornflakes this morning, and I am now convinced that the Grand Canyon was created in a single morning when Jebus made his breakfast.
If the grand canyon was formed in "about a week", due to the biblical flood, why aren't there grand canyons all over the world? Why hasn't Australia got grand canyons? Why is it fairly flat, with rivers that aren't at the bottom of huge canyons? Or New Zealand. Or the Amazon?
Or additionally, why is the Grand Canyon a windy, twisty path? There are a lot of curves in the canyon that a high pressure, high volume water flow would not have made. Speaks to a more sedate and time-intensive process to me.
In the scablands of eastern Washington, there are ripples in the ground like you see at the beach. However these are huge ripples, 100 meters wide and 3 meters tall. That is what the result of a giant flood, in this case the Missula megaflood, looks like. If there really was a worldwide flood the whole world would look like the scablands.
I like how he says "evolutionists" claim such and such about the Grand Canyon. I must have missed where the theory of evolution said anything about geological formations.
Oh you must be new then to kent hovind x3 when he says evolution he talks about the 7 "evolutions" 1. Cosmology evolution 2. Material Evolution 3. Biochemistry evolution 4. Life evolution 5. Macro evolution 6. Micro evolution I am missing one I think its the big bang or something, his argument for why is that we can't just have evolution we need the building blocks of life too etc etc which is rather stupid and someone needs to tell him that evolution while commonly used to refer to a increase of biodiversity it does only mean "change whit time" hence why we also have other theory's of evolution, btw kent also claims we have god even though we don't wanna admit it, from his view see time as a god "given enough time"
@@link7417 Nope, he says only 6. Where he gets none living things evolving is beyond me. Either the whole bible is literally true or none of it is. Personally I don't believe any holy book is true
@@link7417 1. Evolution of the universe itself or cosmology aka the big bang 2. Material evolution the origins of matter 3. Stellar evolution the origins of stars 4. Chemical evolution origins of complex substances 5. Evolution of life or abiogenesis 6. Micro evolution 7 Macro evolution All of these are different theories or hypothesis except 6 and 7 are the same thing and that only one actually called evolution in science.
I mean, if I remember correctly, that's correct in terms of composition to at least a degree, but in the way it was meant... yeah, no, that's absolutely stupid to say.
Subbed to your channel. It’s like a “best of” from my RUclips subscriptions: The knowledge of SciManDan, the disembodied voice and trippy backgrounds of VicedRhino, the occasional angry snarky clap back in the style of SirSic, CinemaSins Dings for the eye roll counter. It’s great keep up the good work.
I'm reminded most of SirSic except the Tick actually plays more than 5 seconds at a time of the source material. Tick has a better balance of humor and facepalm.
@@A-Milkdromeda-Laniakea-Hominid to be fair, Tick is also actually trying to make points, But i think Sic cares more for trying to make it comedic with counterpoints taking a backseat.
How sweet to see a grown man enjoying playing in his own sandpit and paddling pool. All Mr H has to do is submit his ideas to a respected scientific or geological journal for peer review. Until he does, he remains an ignorant preacher, the Bible remains Iron Age fan fiction and evolution remains science.
Wanted to thank you for hosting Dan's channel... you've introduced me to your content allowing me to continue to 'eye-roll' while watching stupidity and sheer unadulterated BS... Thought Kent was in jail... Darn, he must have got out. Consider me a subscriber! Cheers!
I've actually learned a lot of stuff watching youtubers like yourself and Dan debunk these idiots. I mean no where near an expert level, but I definitely appreciate knowing "stuff" even if I will probably make no use of it lol.
I’m always looking to learn more. But I like that I can point things out that others may go ‘oh yeah’ to. Some of it may be obvious, some of it may not be. I could just be confirming what others are thinking, but may not be confident in saying. That’s why I enjoy doing this.
There's a whole lot of them that work on debunking these yercs (young earth creationists), if you like this. Check out Dapper Dinosaur, Gutsick Gibbon, and AronRa, who all tackle these idjits¹ with glee! [1] *idjit* noun *idj•it* | _\'idg•it\_ *idjits* Definition: 1 : a wilfully, deliberately ignorant individual who refuses to learn, unlike someone who, due to birth defects, traumatic brain injuries, or other reasons, is unable to learn simple things like maths, geology, geography, or other sciences at a grade school level. 2 : one who ascribes to the ideas of a flat earth, a young earth, 9/11 "truth," JFK "truth," or that space doesn't exist, and when confronted with evidence that refutes their stance, simply sticks their fingers in their ears and shouts "nuh-uh, I can't hear you!" _'Poor bloke. He's an idjit, though, so he could easily learn better, if he only would!'_ _'Penelope, spouting such utterly unbelievable nonsense shows us you're either stupid, a Poe, or an idjit - which of them is it?'_
The fact that there are more than one Layer of the same material for multiple materials alone shows that the grand canyon couldn‘t have formed in a short time. But hey, i guess Kent Hovind fans haven‘t used their brains in a long time, so that tiny little giant red flag might be too hard for them to spot. 🤷
Kent: "assume Dan is honest and wants to know the truth". So immediately Dan switches off Kent who knows nothing and looks for someone who knows the truth, a professional geologist. Good advice Kenty lad.
I urge you to find his dissertation on Wiki leaks. You'll see how this man's only doctorate is in shoving pencils so far up his nose it affects his speech pattern, and now he can't do math.
Emma Thorne did a read through of it recently and its basically his power point slides in a wall of text including all errors. It starts Hello my name is Kent Hovind. lol
I think describing Kent Hovind as someone we all love to roll our eyes at whenever he opens his mouth is the single most accurate statement I've heard all week
Only 7 minutes in, and Kent never ceases to amaze me. He is a old-as-dirt man defaulting to childish, "Nuh-uh! You're wrong because I said you're wrong! MOM!" It actually kinda ticks me off ngl...
Not forgetting that the G-C meanders like you'd expect from a river. If it was cut like Kent suggests, it'd have been cut by a tsunami which would leave a straight cut
Well, he could just make an experiment flushing several thousands liters of water over a sand stone at normal water speed and see how much of the stone will vanish and extrapolate this to the grand canyon. No he chooses high pressure water on mudd, otherwise he would have proven himself wrong ...
There's a basic, pure logic issue I see here with Kent's position that I feel like should be pointed out and I'm not sure if anybody has. It's his position that the layers of stone around the Grand Canyon were laid down by the flood. It's also his position that the canyon that cuts through the stone was laid down during the flood when a damn burst upen and the rushing water cut through the stone. How can the river cut through layers of rock that haven't been laid down yet?
"It's a great place to raise kids, huh?" Wow! I can't believe he says that after a child died there because they have ponds that are not protected by life guards.
Saw you as a guest on Dan's channel. You got a sub right away. Really like the 2 videos i have seen so far. That one on Dan's channel and this one. Keep it up. This kind of delusional thinking needs to be addressed. I do not mind religion as a philosophical way of living/thinking. However, when the try to debunk science with religion someone need to stop it. The same goes to flat earther and conspiration theories.
Both. The flood laid it down, then it dried, but somehow formed a dam at the mouth of the Colorado that then burst, and all that water carved the grand canyons 3000ish square km area in a week, while performing the supernatural feat of reversing direction a couple times, and gently curving in an "S" shape some others.
I just found your channel after watching videos from the likes of GeneticallyModifiedSkeptic and ScienceManDan and I gotta say - nice channel pun. If you have any of those flat earth and conspiracy videos, I'd love to see them! Happy to appreciate all the atheist stuff in the meantime, I tend to learn cool science stuff while watching these.
What gets me about his whole argument is that he can't speak in minute details. If Kent has been to the Grand Canyon, then he's aware that at several points in its 3000+ km2 area, it slowly and gradually curves, forming an "s" or a "u" shape. I have never once heard Kent explain how his "liquid sand paper" thought bubble of rushing waters slicing through stone like it's loose mud, can explain that phenomena. He doesn't talk about how that limestone requires more life than the planet could sustain by itself to lay down in that area, if all done at once. Nope, he'd just rather find the point where "laid down by water" is mentioned by actual scientists then spend the rest of his time telling those scientists, among others, they're wrong.
It is written in the legendary big book of duuuh: When you watch every single Hovind video one after another, you roll your eyes enough time to reverse the rotation of the earth.
I am amazed at their incompetence in organizing things. The fact that you can hear the video echo on their side and every breathe they take, makes it much more annoying to listen to
Just a little correction, it is not just the density of the material the most important thing for the dam, their cohesion is also very important, if I used an ultra light concrete, or a very loose soil composed of iron ore, the first one will probably resist more. Sandstone is stronger than sand mainly because the grains are cemented or fused together, not because of the density.
How big does Kent think the canyon is? Also if the grand canyon was formed in a week, there would be no roads today, considering how much it rains and freezes annually
I would not disagree if all his "whack an atheist" segments were reported for bullying. I think there could be a strong case made for it, or at least how it could be honestly construed to appear that way.
12:42 I believe he just claimed all rock to be the same age, while he also claimed for some layer to have been created by the flood. Now, unless those things happened right after another he may have just contradicted himself.
Watching a bunch of narcissists take on the whole of scientific progress with arguments that can be disproven by backyard science experiments is an incredible wonder of nature.
Kent also loves his hydrologic sorting and if that happened during the flood there would only be one layer of each, but he conveniently forgets to mention that...
I am confused: is Kent claiming Noah's flood is responsible for creating the layers that were later eroded by a massive rush of water to create the Grand Canyon... or is he claiming that Noah's flood WAS the massive rush of water that eroded rock layers previously laid down by some other massive water event?
If the Grand Canyon could get to the depth it is now, in a week, wouldn't it be way deeper by now? Wouldn't it be alarmingly deep? I think I heard that somewhere before.
"There's absolutely no evidence of an animal ever producing any animal other than it's own kind." Except for horses, donkeys, tigers, lions, zebras, goats, etc when they're crossed to make offspring like mules, ligers, tigons, zebroids, wholphins, camas, coywolfs, etc.
While it's great watching people point out how absolutely ridiculous these theists are, at the same time it's painful to watch how absolutely ridiculous they are. The video is also delisted now. That just makes this whole thing even better.
KH claims the GC was made in a week, right? but the GC is carved INTO layers of limestone, sandstone, shale, etc. so the "Great Flood" had to lay down the layers first at over 6000ft high, compress the materials into rock and THEN carve it out in the shape of GC. all in a week? sounds ambitious.
Thank you for addressing this charlatan’s Grand Canyon formation fantasy. It’s one of his most annoying claims. And his insufferable air of superiority is odious.
Kent talking about children drowning? That's a bit sick of him, considering a child drowned in his dinosaur adventure land site. He took no responsibility for the death, not only that, he blamed the parents!!!!! Another child went missing after appearing on his show, but i don't know much about that one, so i can't comment so much. There was a bit of a sick joke going around for a while, it went, " Come to Dinosaur adventure land, a child 2 for 1 offer, come with 2 kids, leave with one".
Ok this is only the second video I have seen with him, and the first time I have no clue what he was talking about because i can not get past how he says "water", i spent the whole time laughing at him.
According to Kent, the rock layers AND the canyon were supposed to be formed during the flood. The rocks would have to be formed, then cut through during the flood.
@Brandon Shaver Yet around the seven-fifty mark, Hovind implied that all the layer of the Grand Canyon just settled into place after drifting as rock particles through the flood. I sense a God of the gaps argument here, and even as a Christian myself I wouldn't go that far. Especially since in the first four verses of the 8th chapter of Genesis it's implied the water receded. Knowing Hovind, he's probably say that's when the Grand Canyon was formed, which would take an act of God...
@@TheSkepTick it's actually matt Powell classic. Viced rhino makes a vid and Matt never fails to private for a while. That way viced rhinos people stop watching and Matt can put the vid back up without so many people correcting him.
Oh your channel is great lol I enjoyed this watch. Suuuuuubed. And that younger guy's body language next to hovin looks like many to my eye, such as, uncomfortable, and slightly doubtful Lol
If the Grand Canyon was carved out in a week why did it stop and why don't we see this level of erosion now? We would be able to observe considerable erosion with every heavy rainfall, Please explain that Kant Hovind.
Another great response to Kent’s Whack an Atheist segment. Subscribed. That’s two I’ve seen in a week. Imagine the canyon you could create!
I just found this guy, too! Excited to see more!
Thanks Dan for pointing us in this direction.
Yeah. Thanx Dan for pointing me to this guy.
I just found him because of you, too, Dan, so thanks so much!
Kent: Erosion can happen very quickly.
Not without something abrasive, which water is not.
love how kent after making a claim, looks at matt for validation, but matt is just ignoring him not understanding anything thats happening
I wonder why matt is even there in most cases since he rearly say anything, I will assume it is to make it look like kent does not stand alone in his world view or something lol
@@link7417 matt is kent's successor.
as far as i know kent isnt really in good relations with his son.
@@spatrk6634 yea I know that is what said but if thats the case one would think Kent would give him a more of a role in the programming but hey kent works in mysterious ways just like his god
So let me get this right, the flood lays down the layers and compresses them into rock, while simultaneously cutting the rock it is laying down and has not yet solidified? Got it.
Exactly! Was the flood laying down the rock layers or carving them up? Or both at the same time?! And where was this 'evaporation' part of the process for producing rock while under the flood waters? Ken Hovind's explanations are as clear as the mud of his imaginary flood waters. Also, which direction were the flood waters moving? Look at a map of the Grand Canyon and Colorado River - they twist around in all directions. That's one confused flood!
And also while salamanders in the middle of those layers were leaving behind fossilized footprints.
Don't forget that the high pressure beam of water cutting through the rocks meanders and creates switchbacks, rather than going straight
Matt does look like he's being held against his will.
I'm not entirely convinced Matt has a will. He does have a gia t inflatable banana in his backyard which he calls Dr. Peel.
@@Magekind Does he have a way though?
He's not sophisticated enough to even have a will.
With Kent's background, I'd be uncomfortable knowing that he's in the same building.
@@DissedRedEngie Point. I'd certainly be concerned if I were stuck in a room with a bloviating creationist. By the way, your profile picture looks like a dapper Mr. Carmen Sandiego, PE. Cheers.
Thunderf00t covered a claim similar to this in his Why Do People Laugh At Creationists series. He said the water would have had to rush through at a speed greater than sound…
That’s one heck of a big power washer…!
@@TheSkepTick yeah just ask the good “doctor”! That wat-ter will wash through there like a son of a bitch!
@@TheSkepTick I covered that as well. Noah's ark would've been in big trouble.
@@smearedwithsoot6362 Even if we *give* him the canyon, the Noachian deluge would turn the Earth into a glowy marble two hours in.
Love that he pulls up a power point to defend his claim and it really just comes down to "nuh-uh!"
It's so embarrassing...!
Just the most fucking boomer energy there ever was.
As a person who ACTUALLY LIVES next to the dam of the Colorado River, I want to give Kent a pile of loose dirt next to a big chunk of sandstone then ask him to SIMPLY, take a scoop out of each one with his hand. Comedy gold that.
Keep a gun trained on him to make him try.
Hey Kent let's do a standoff. From 20 yards away...you throw dirt at me and I'll throw rocks at you. Sound fair?
You're nicer than me. I would simply tell him that, if he really believes there's no difference, he shouldn't mind if I whack him in the head with the sandstone.
I poured milk onto my Cornflakes this morning, and I am now convinced that the Grand Canyon was created in a single morning when Jebus made his breakfast.
Not a fan of cornflakes, less of a fan of dead planet soup that Jaaaayzus would have been having.
Just found your channel, always good to have another voice speaking against pseudoscience & superstition. Liked/subscribed.
Thanks Monster! Looking forward to seeing you around the channel!
If the grand canyon was formed in "about a week", due to the biblical flood, why aren't there grand canyons all over the world?
Why hasn't Australia got grand canyons?
Why is it fairly flat, with rivers that aren't at the bottom of huge canyons?
Or New Zealand. Or the Amazon?
Or additionally, why is the Grand Canyon a windy, twisty path? There are a lot of curves in the canyon that a high pressure, high volume water flow would not have made. Speaks to a more sedate and time-intensive process to me.
If the pressure wave created the grand canyon, I wonder how all the other buildings around the world that managed to survive.
In the scablands of eastern Washington, there are ripples in the ground like you see at the beach. However these are huge ripples, 100 meters wide and 3 meters tall. That is what the result of a giant flood, in this case the Missula megaflood, looks like. If there really was a worldwide flood the whole world would look like the scablands.
I like how he says "evolutionists" claim such and such about the Grand Canyon. I must have missed where the theory of evolution said anything about geological formations.
Oh you must be new then to kent hovind x3 when he says evolution he talks about the 7 "evolutions"
1. Cosmology evolution
2. Material Evolution
3. Biochemistry evolution
4. Life evolution
5. Macro evolution
6. Micro evolution
I am missing one I think its the big bang or something, his argument for why is that we can't just have evolution we need the building blocks of life too etc etc which is rather stupid and someone needs to tell him that evolution while commonly used to refer to a increase of biodiversity it does only mean "change whit time" hence why we also have other theory's of evolution, btw kent also claims we have god even though we don't wanna admit it, from his view see time as a god "given enough time"
@@link7417 yeah I've heard some of that stuff. I just don't get it from their perspective other than he's using "evolutionist" as basically a slur.
@@CeeJayThe13th oh yea, he is deffinetly using that to insult his opposition for the weary least
@@link7417 Nope, he says only 6. Where he gets none living things evolving is beyond me. Either the whole bible is literally true or none of it is. Personally I don't believe any holy book is true
@@link7417
1. Evolution of the universe itself or cosmology aka the big bang
2. Material evolution the origins of matter
3. Stellar evolution the origins of stars
4. Chemical evolution origins of complex substances
5. Evolution of life or abiogenesis
6. Micro evolution
7 Macro evolution
All of these are different theories or hypothesis except 6 and 7 are the same thing and that only one actually called evolution in science.
Kent: "dirt is the same as rock"
Common sense: "wtf"
Even knowing nothing about geology should make it obvious that we are building with brick, rock or concrete and not mudblocks.
Hovind... Shit is the same as brains👍😁
@@vinnyganzano1930
You tell him that, and I get the sense he'd be dumb enough to believe you.
So you believe Adam came from a rock?😁
I mean, if I remember correctly, that's correct in terms of composition to at least a degree, but in the way it was meant... yeah, no, that's absolutely stupid to say.
Don't forget that the "good Dr" has been arrested for domestic violence not too long ago...
Doesn't make him wrong. (Other things do that.) Does mean he's an asshole.
He just cant stop getting arrested can he, well thats just more proof of him being unable to learn from his mistakes
@@brucebaker810
Well it means that his views on women are definitely wrong enough to get the police involved
You must not have seen how he was charged for pedophilia
Subbed to your channel. It’s like a “best of” from my RUclips subscriptions: The knowledge of SciManDan, the disembodied voice and trippy backgrounds of VicedRhino, the occasional angry snarky clap back in the style of SirSic, CinemaSins Dings for the eye roll counter. It’s great keep up the good work.
I'm reminded most of SirSic except the Tick actually plays more than 5 seconds at a time of the source material. Tick has a better balance of humor and facepalm.
Love ol' Siccy boy but I wish he'd stop stealing all the whisky.
@@A-Milkdromeda-Laniakea-Hominid to be fair, Tick is also actually trying to make points, But i think Sic cares more for trying to make it comedic with counterpoints taking a backseat.
How sweet to see a grown man enjoying playing in his own sandpit and paddling pool. All Mr H has to do is submit his ideas to a respected scientific or geological journal for peer review. Until he does, he remains an ignorant preacher, the Bible remains Iron Age fan fiction and evolution remains science.
Wanted to thank you for hosting Dan's channel... you've introduced me to your content allowing me to continue to 'eye-roll' while watching stupidity and sheer unadulterated BS... Thought Kent was in jail... Darn, he must have got out. Consider me a subscriber! Cheers!
Kent is appealing his sentence as far as I know the court date has not been set or at least any one in the skeptic community has not said anything.
You are truly doing gods work mr. Skeptic.
He never mentioned the igneous rock portion which takes extraordinary heat and pressure. Unless the water was above boiling. Lol!!!
I believe he was thinking of ingenious rock, not igneous rock, that it had a mind of it's own and that's how it formed 😂
To say nothing of how the layers simultaneously formed and was cut out to get what we see of the grand canyon, or really any canyon.
Skeptic reacting to Kent Hovind reacting to SciManDan reacting to Kent Hovind is peak reaction content
It’s what the people want 🤣
He got banned for "misinformation", in other words, something the ruling class needed its slaves to believe.
I've actually learned a lot of stuff watching youtubers like yourself and Dan debunk these idiots. I mean no where near an expert level, but I definitely appreciate knowing "stuff" even if I will probably make no use of it lol.
I’m always looking to learn more. But I like that I can point things out that others may go ‘oh yeah’ to. Some of it may be obvious, some of it may not be. I could just be confirming what others are thinking, but may not be confident in saying. That’s why I enjoy doing this.
There's a whole lot of them that work on debunking these yercs (young earth creationists), if you like this. Check out Dapper Dinosaur, Gutsick Gibbon, and AronRa, who all tackle these idjits¹ with glee!
[1]
*idjit*
noun
*idj•it* | _\'idg•it\_
*idjits*
Definition:
1 : a wilfully, deliberately ignorant individual who refuses to learn, unlike someone who, due to birth defects, traumatic brain injuries, or other reasons, is unable to learn simple things like maths, geology, geography, or other sciences at a grade school level.
2 : one who ascribes to the ideas of a flat earth, a young earth, 9/11 "truth," JFK "truth," or that space doesn't exist, and when confronted with evidence that refutes their stance, simply sticks their fingers in their ears and shouts "nuh-uh, I can't hear you!"
_'Poor bloke. He's an idjit, though, so he could easily learn better, if he only would!'_
_'Penelope, spouting such utterly unbelievable nonsense shows us you're either stupid, a Poe, or an idjit - which of them is it?'_
@@MaryAnnNytowl Add Professor Dave, Paulogia and Renegade Science Teacher to the list.
Kent actually erodes his own argument, by utterly failing to understand geology. I guess that makes sense when your degree is in fairytale.
TBS
The fact that there are more than one Layer of the same material for multiple materials alone shows that the grand canyon couldn‘t have formed in a short time.
But hey, i guess Kent Hovind fans haven‘t used their brains in a long time, so that tiny little giant red flag might be too hard for them to spot. 🤷
Brains, you think these people, I use the term loosely, have brains???🤯
@@vinnyganzano1930 well something has to regulate their breathing.
Kent: "assume Dan is honest and wants to know the truth". So immediately Dan switches off Kent who knows nothing and looks for someone who knows the truth, a professional geologist. Good advice Kenty lad.
I wanna have a stand off with Kent. From 20 yards away...he can throw dirt at me and I'll throw rocks at him. I mean that's fair, right?
"With everything drownding" - 7:54 🤣 I thought this guy was supposed to be a doctor??
A doctorate from a kid on creationist uni for a young earth creationist, I could knock up 100 during my lunch hour.
I urge you to find his dissertation on Wiki leaks.
You'll see how this man's only doctorate is in shoving pencils so far up his nose it affects his speech pattern, and now he can't do math.
Emma Thorne did a read through of it recently and its basically his power point slides in a wall of text including all errors. It starts Hello my name is Kent Hovind. lol
This is what I like to see Atheists helping Atheists
To be fair, a lot of christians are whacking Kent Hovind too.
@@tezzerii good lol
@@tezzerii even other young earth creationists try to distance themselves from Kent.
Learned of this channel from Sciman Dan. Just subbed, keep the videos coming my friend!
I think describing Kent Hovind as someone we all love to roll our eyes at whenever he opens his mouth is the single most accurate statement I've heard all week
Only 7 minutes in, and Kent never ceases to amaze me. He is a old-as-dirt man defaulting to childish, "Nuh-uh! You're wrong because I said you're wrong! MOM!" It actually kinda ticks me off ngl...
Yeah, it's annoying AF.
Every speck of dirt is the same age, which is why every radioactive isotope of the same type has aged the exact same amount in each layer-- OH WAIT.
Not forgetting that the G-C meanders like you'd expect from a river. If it was cut like Kent suggests, it'd have been cut by a tsunami which would leave a straight cut
Thanks too ScimanDan for pointing me here. Great video.
Well, he could just make an experiment flushing several thousands liters of water over a sand stone at normal water speed and see how much of the stone will vanish and extrapolate this to the grand canyon.
No he chooses high pressure water on mudd, otherwise he would have proven himself wrong ...
"Beautiful children you have there, Matt. Be a shame if something happened to em." - Kent Hovind, probably
Here from SciManDan... you just got a new subscriber... just binge watching your videos
13:25 - 13:27 he forgot the Vishnu schist, which is a metamorphic rock
There's a basic, pure logic issue I see here with Kent's position that I feel like should be pointed out and I'm not sure if anybody has. It's his position that the layers of stone around the Grand Canyon were laid down by the flood. It's also his position that the canyon that cuts through the stone was laid down during the flood when a damn burst upen and the rushing water cut through the stone. How can the river cut through layers of rock that haven't been laid down yet?
Arrived from scimandan, now subscribed. Love your work!
"It's a great place to raise kids, huh?"
Wow! I can't believe he says that after a child died there because they have ponds that are not protected by life guards.
Saw you as a guest on Dan's channel. You got a sub right away. Really like the 2 videos i have seen so far. That one on Dan's channel and this one. Keep it up. This kind of delusional thinking needs to be addressed. I do not mind religion as a philosophical way of living/thinking. However, when the try to debunk science with religion someone need to stop it.
The same goes to flat earther and conspiration theories.
Thank you arvid!
So did the flood lay down the layers of rock or cut through the layers of rock that were already formed?
Yes
Both. The flood laid it down, then it dried, but somehow formed a dam at the mouth of the Colorado that then burst, and all that water carved the grand canyons 3000ish square km area in a week, while performing the supernatural feat of reversing direction a couple times, and gently curving in an "S" shape some others.
@@Thoron_of_Neto sorry but I don't think my brain can process that level of stupid
I just found your channel after watching videos from the likes of GeneticallyModifiedSkeptic and ScienceManDan and I gotta say - nice channel pun. If you have any of those flat earth and conspiracy videos, I'd love to see them! Happy to appreciate all the atheist stuff in the meantime, I tend to learn cool science stuff while watching these.
What gets me about his whole argument is that he can't speak in minute details. If Kent has been to the Grand Canyon, then he's aware that at several points in its 3000+ km2 area, it slowly and gradually curves, forming an "s" or a "u" shape.
I have never once heard Kent explain how his "liquid sand paper" thought bubble of rushing waters slicing through stone like it's loose mud, can explain that phenomena.
He doesn't talk about how that limestone requires more life than the planet could sustain by itself to lay down in that area, if all done at once. Nope, he'd just rather find the point where "laid down by water" is mentioned by actual scientists then spend the rest of his time telling those scientists, among others, they're wrong.
Love SciManDan, love you for defending him. Subscribed!
It is written in the legendary big book of duuuh: When you watch every single Hovind video one after another, you roll your eyes enough time to reverse the rotation of the earth.
Nice... enjoyed that...! 😂
@@Unpeturbed you're welcome 😅
Do you think Kent pays Matt Powell in bananas? At the end of each whack an atheist he just hands him a hand of bananas as a treat
I don't think he really knows about the term drinking the kool-aid, and where it came from.
It was extremely ironic when he is running a cult compound.
I am amazed at their incompetence in organizing things. The fact that you can hear the video echo on their side and every breathe they take, makes it much more annoying to listen to
I wonder if Kent is willing to explain why the Grand Canyon isn’t growing deeper every week.
Just a little correction, it is not just the density of the material the most important thing for the dam, their cohesion is also very important, if I used an ultra light concrete, or a very loose soil composed of iron ore, the first one will probably resist more.
Sandstone is stronger than sand mainly because the grains are cemented or fused together, not because of the density.
How big does Kent think the canyon is? Also if the grand canyon was formed in a week, there would be no roads today, considering how much it rains and freezes annually
I would not disagree if all his "whack an atheist" segments were reported for bullying. I think there could be a strong case made for it, or at least how it could be honestly construed to appear that way.
12:42 I believe he just claimed all rock to be the same age, while he also claimed for some layer to have been created by the flood.
Now, unless those things happened right after another he may have just contradicted himself.
Sorry Xians: genetics sealed the deal: all life is related through descent.
I'm waiting for the day we find out Hovind and Powell are secretly lovers.
Kent's new special regular feature: Let's laugh with the funny misogynist!! 🤪
Top shelf stuff, as usual.
Kangaroo evolved from T-Rex.
The keyword in the descriptions of those layers is "stone," sediments became stone that were carved through by water over millions of years.
Awesome that You Tube took down Kent's channel!
8:01 Matt wondering if he could escape through that ventilation system up there!😜
Maybe don't have the holly spirit as producer. He never shows up to work. Could fix the audio issue.
How could people who follow Kent call themselves christian? The ignorance, hatefulness and attacks on other people’s views is appalling.
In all the examples Phake Hovind point to, there never a duration for the formation of lime/sand stone, just the elements needed.
Sooooo he explained how sedimentary rock forms, then follows it with everything's the same age, rocks can't be formed 😑
"Where have I been misleading" followed by him claiming that Darwin was an atheist a couple of seconds later. That didn't take long
Watching a bunch of narcissists take on the whole of scientific progress with arguments that can be disproven by backyard science experiments is an incredible wonder of nature.
If you haven't read Kent's "doctoral" thesis, you definitely should. It's hilariously pitiful.
New subscriber from.sciman Dan going to binge watch your vids
Kent also loves his hydrologic sorting and if that happened during the flood there would only be one layer of each, but he conveniently forgets to mention that...
“Evidences”…classic case of a theist not understanding grammar.
"Drownding" 😀
I am confused: is Kent claiming Noah's flood is responsible for creating the layers that were later eroded by a massive rush of water to create the Grand Canyon... or is he claiming that Noah's flood WAS the massive rush of water that eroded rock layers previously laid down by some other massive water event?
I don't think you're the only one confused - Kent seems to be as well, as he appears to be claiming both
Kent is real strange dilemma where the more people refute him the more powerful he seems to get, but left unchecked who knows what might happen.
I wanted to give kent some pointers on listening and understanding what people say on his vid, but sadly that vid is now 'private'.
If the Grand Canyon could get to the depth it is now, in a week, wouldn't it be way deeper by now? Wouldn't it be alarmingly deep? I think I heard that somewhere before.
"There's absolutely no evidence of an animal ever producing any animal other than it's own kind." Except for horses, donkeys, tigers, lions, zebras, goats, etc when they're crossed to make offspring like mules, ligers, tigons, zebroids, wholphins, camas, coywolfs, etc.
While it's great watching people point out how absolutely ridiculous these theists are, at the same time it's painful to watch how absolutely ridiculous they are.
The video is also delisted now. That just makes this whole thing even better.
KH claims the GC was made in a week, right?
but the GC is carved INTO layers of limestone, sandstone, shale, etc.
so the "Great Flood" had to lay down the layers first at over 6000ft high, compress the materials into rock and THEN carve it out in the shape of GC.
all in a week? sounds ambitious.
Ahahah inmate Hovind has been blocked... made my day.
Did the flood deposit the layers or carve through the layers? I’m confused!
Thank you for addressing this charlatan’s Grand Canyon formation fantasy. It’s one of his most annoying claims. And his insufferable air of superiority is odious.
My favourite evidence for how we know the grand canion was eroded slowly: the fucking thing meanders. Only slow moving water meanders.
Kent talking about children drowning? That's a bit sick of him, considering a child drowned in his dinosaur adventure land site. He took no responsibility for the death, not only that, he blamed the parents!!!!!
Another child went missing after appearing on his show, but i don't know much about that one, so i can't comment so much.
There was a bit of a sick joke going around for a while, it went, " Come to Dinosaur adventure land, a child 2 for 1 offer, come with 2 kids, leave with one".
I didn’t know about this! I’m going to look into it now!
He's such a nice man, just like all those those lovely priests who abused children for how many years?
@@TheSkepTick oh man, it is quite horrendous! He mentions the family is always welcome to come down and have fun again or something like that...
Oh yes, the small boy ‘invited’ to Kent’s Kompound by one of Kent’s Kiddy Fiddler Friends…
Ok this is only the second video I have seen with him, and the first time I have no clue what he was talking about because i can not get past how he says "water", i spent the whole time laughing at him.
It’s REALLY strange!!! Completely agree.
According to Kent, the rock layers AND the canyon were supposed to be formed during the flood. The rocks would have to be formed, then cut through during the flood.
@Brandon Shaver
Yet around the seven-fifty mark, Hovind implied that all the layer of the Grand Canyon just settled into place after drifting as rock particles through the flood.
I sense a God of the gaps argument here, and even as a Christian myself I wouldn't go that far. Especially since in the first four verses of the 8th chapter of Genesis it's implied the water receded. Knowing Hovind, he's probably say that's when the Grand Canyon was formed, which would take an act of God...
"Drownding" is Okie Standard English for "drowning," just as "acrosst" is Okie Standard English for "across."
I've subscribed to you and I've told my mates to. Just so you know it's because you have good content but it's also down to Dan so show him some love.
I commented on Sciman Dan's video that using Kents idea and maths on the grand canyon erosion it would take 101days...he actually debunked himself
Just took a look at the Kent and Matt video link and it's been made private. Guess it'd be a bit much to hope that Matt is starting to question
I find it hugely entertaining that the video has already been marked as private. It's like he's acknowledging that's it's rubbish.
I didn’t realise that!
@@TheSkepTick it's actually matt Powell classic. Viced rhino makes a vid and Matt never fails to private for a while. That way viced rhinos people stop watching and Matt can put the vid back up without so many people correcting him.
Tried to see the video of Matt Powell, the video is private. What cowards.
Found you through Dan. Gained my sub
How does anything especially organic debris settle in the bottom of something moving as fast as he implies?
Oh your channel is great lol I enjoyed this watch. Suuuuuubed. And that younger guy's body language next to hovin looks like many to my eye, such as, uncomfortable, and slightly doubtful Lol
Wh....
Why was *Spongebob* in the whack-a-mole machine at the beginning 🤦♂️
If the Grand Canyon was carved out in a week why did it stop and why don't we see this level of erosion now?
We would be able to observe considerable erosion with every heavy rainfall, Please explain that Kant Hovind.
Matt Powell looks entertained by all this
There are a few types of liquid sandpaper available. Nitric acid is one for metals.
Every speck of dirt is the same age? broooooooooooo stoooooooop
You just know that if he could, Kent would sooner burn an Atheist than wack one. He overwhelms me with his Christian kindness.
That reminds me, i forgot to bother Kent today, brb...i just love asking him if he is a convicted criminal