Batman Arkham City vs Arkham Origins - Gotham City comparison
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 мар 2014
- Max vs Low series:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assassin's Creed: Revelations: • Assassin's Creed: Reve...
Crysis 2: • Crysis 2 - Low vs Max
Portal: • Valve's Portal - Low v...
Battlefield Bad Company 2: • Battlefield: Bad Compa...
Grand Theft Auto IV: • Grand Theft Auto IV GT...
Batman Arkham City: • Batman Arkham City - L...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out my other Batman: Arkham City videos:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
141x Combo in Challenge Room: • Batman: Arkham City - ...
Benchmark on EVGA GTX690 without Fraps: • Batman: Arkham City Be...
Riddler Challenge with Cat-Woman: • Batman: Arkham City - ...
Riddler Challenge: • Batman: Arkham City - ...
Riddler Challenge with Cat-Woman: • Batman: Arkham City Ri...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specs:
CPU: Intel i7-2600k @4.4GHz
GPU: EVGA nVidia GTX690 4GB @1.2GHz
RAM: Kingston Hyperx @1600MHz
MEM: Kingston HyperX 120GB SSD RAID0
MBO: Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P
PSU: Corsair TX750
Recorded using Fraps. Created with Adobe Premiere Pro.
Please Like! the video and subscribe If you want to see more videos like this ! 
Игры
![ian - Fit Check (Feat. VonOff1700) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/sDGWDBg45Dw/mqdefault.jpg)
“I remember this place back before they built a wall around it, sucked then too.”-joker thug
"Do you remember winters being this cold? Y'know as a kid?" -also Joker thug
well Donald trump paid for it
@@shadowrev2914 "Nah every year is a little colder for me I blame freaks like Freeze I heard he likes it cold"
@@njgrant3988 lol
I guess he was foreshadowing Arkham Origins.
When developing an open world, it’s easy to take an already built-together city and have it run down and destroyed. But taking a destroyed city and rebuilding it to make it functional is harder than it looks. Respect for the developers.
Origins is an underrated game.
"But taking a destroyed city and rebuilding it to make it functional is harder than it looks."
And what a creative waste of effort. "Hey, let's take this visually interesting and unique world and make it more boring. Sounds like a great idea to build our entire open world off of."
@@turbonerdo6838 sounds like cope
⁴
@@turbonerdo6838 as much as I love city a quarter of the map is unexplorable and a waste thanks to the water , origins fixed it
I know the reason they reused the map was to save dev resources, but I actually like the continuity it kept through both of these games. Something that was kind of sad to lose with Arkham Knight. Arkham knight almost feels like it’s in a different universe
The maps for arkham city and origins are under the 3 islands of arkham knight, you can see them on the map.
@@heinrichvonschnitzel8600what are you talking about?
@redangrycloud Arkham Knight isn't the entirety of Gotham city, just the 3 central islands. Same way as arkham origins/city just happen in a slum.
@@heinrichvonschnitzel8600 They should be part of the playable area then. Or ideally have is as similar to scenery form Arkham City.
@@Kacpa2 The Batmobile would not be accommodated for with the old narrow design of the past city games.
It’s unfortunate, but at least they didn’t retcon/change any of the old cities, because I love the old ones just the way they are.
Origins took place on Christmas, so it makes sense it had more winter storm fog than City.
Arkham city was set in the middle of winter
@@domii_gaming6335 even if its in the middle of winter that doesn't meen it should snow (alot)
@@basictrolle4246 it would snow the same amount all winter. It doesn't matter if its Christmas.
Bruce Wayne you’re *
You’re a fucking dumbass
@@domii_gaming6335 jesus christ its like 2010 kid wars in the comment section all over again.
Dont forget origin was before city,Some city structures/buildings changed over years...
+Steve Normandin yes, obviously but some of those changes are things like building completely changing their appearence, roads changing position, church having completely different bell tower with completely different fence etc.
+Mateusz Wojtkiewicz still trying to figure out how a train station can become a police station
Mateusz Wojtkiewicz Yes Im afraid that is true,so you make my comment invalid XD
also I believe that the building that Poison Ivy lives in Arkham City is literally built out from the water as seen in Arkham Origins
false! origins came in 2013 and city 2011
When I was a kid I loved these games so much. Now that I'm way older I appreciate them even more because of the detail and lore that went into these games.
Nothing beats the atmosphere of Arkham City. But Origins was great too,more difficult than Arkham City.
I think Arkham Asylum had a better atmosphere but overall City was a better game.
@Marcel MX10 Agreed I think City did almost everything better than Asylum but I just feel like the atmosphere was just better in Asylum then it was in City but do I blame them no as the Asylum was such a good setting.
How to go to fucking restricted area
No city is no where as good as origins fuck off
Lol I had different experience. Origins was probably easiest Arkham of all four. I didnt die often and even collected every Riddler trophies during first run. The hardest for me was Knight
All I expected out of origins was a way to kill time till knight. That's what I got. Therefore I enjoyed origins. It was like a big dlc.
I wish it was a dlc
+LIL-countdown bought it for the price of a DLC 😂 4,99 Euro
Yeah I play it on Christmas sometimes.
@@pheanix8647 German? :D
Same
Origins has much better boss fights than Arkham Knight. There, I said it.
ryanspears1986 I agree with you. It seems ridiculous at that point that people are saying Arkham Knight is 10/10 simply because it's developed by Rocksteady and Origins is 4/10 because it wasn't when in fact Origins is better than Knight in many aspects. Not to mention some things from Origins has been implemented by Rocksteady in Knight.
It's not that it's made by rocksteady... okay it is.. They lost their ... Game. From epic boss fights in arkham city to disappointing and annoying tank fights in arkham knight. I think the only reason why it's 10/10 is because of first impressions, how these reviewers are fixed onto the graphics and "you get to drive the batmobile!". I don't think they know what an arkham game really is. I'd rather fight Deathstroke in Arkham Origins than in Arkham Knight mainly because I actually Enjoyed fighting him up close.
57GreenGuy yup
I agree with you, Arkham Knight is a good game but I wanted to use my fighting skills against the supervillains.
57GreenGuy Rocksteady shit all over the character of Deathstroke. They threw him in a tank and recycled the same tank battle you already had with the Arkham Knight earlier in the game. I was stunned by the laziness. I think someone at WB probably sent a memo to Rocksteady like a week before launch saying, "Oh, by the way, you have to have a Deathstroke boss fight in the game. Period." And forget about Deathstroke for a second, I was expecting a one-on-one fight with the Arkham Knight! I could've been a little more forgiving about the Deathstroke thing if they had at least had a hand-to-hand boss fight with the main villain of the game who is in the game's freaking title for Christ's sake.
Generally speaking, Arkham City's city looked better. But Arkham Origins somewhat captured the "Fuck this place, I don't want to be here" vibe of Gotham, which is necessary for me personally. I'm still on the fence. I'm looking for something similar to the Gothic atmosphere of Arkham Asylum. Arkham Origins is closer to delivering that, I think. If only it was as detailed and as creatively designed as Arkham City.
Finally someone said it the dark gothic and dreary atmoshapre of orgins makes me wanna prefer it over citys neon lights and walled up atmospare.
Are you stupid? Origins was better!
Exactly
imo, i prefer the skyscrapers of arkham city, gothic and art deco style, i prefer the industrial district of origins and the actual buildings inside the map boundaries of knight
I I feel like Arkham Knight is a mix between them
Origins city appears more realistic while the previous one felt more Tim Burton-y
Yeah same opinion
right . Because a world with a dude in a batsuit and bat underpants needs to have the realistic factor as importatn..
@@danielcastaneda4975 right, because I said that’s what it “needs”. It’s an observation, not critique.
Tim burton-y is not a bad thing
@@bullymaguire513 nope, it isn’t.
Arkham City have better graphic,but the suit Origins win.
There're a lot of good things about Origins.
i think you mean origins has better graphics but city wins.
Bob Donald How to fix color correction of Arkham Origins: Install SweetFX
Arkham orgins has awful art color is why I don't like it
I love city more
Bob Donald origins runs at 720p max city runs at 1080p max if you get the remaster it runs at 2160p max
both of them were good , i love both
same...
Yes!
I miss Origins. wish they would remaster it for PS4. I tried replaying it on my old PS3 and the controller felt weird. Wasn't the same feel...
You could always buy a Xbox One which has backward compatibility. And of course, Batman Arkham Origins is playable on One. It's pretty damn good playing classics games with an improved controller and slightly better resolution.
limitlesscamo134 id rather clean my toilet with my tongue
that's why I can't play it either.
You can use a PS4 controller on ps3. Just use the Bluetooth feature
Myst3ry You can use it wired too
When I saw the Museum (Cyrus Pinkney's Institute), The Old GCPD Building, The Courthouse, The ACE Chemical Building, The Iceberg Lounge, The Church, Wonder Tower, Amusement Mile, Industrial District, Sionis Industries, Park Row and The Bowery from Arkham City when I first played Arkham Origins, I was hit with a tidal wave of nostalgia.
Oh my God, I'm just now realizing that they're both set in the same place. I'll never look at it the same way again.
you're kidding, right?
@@alfiethedinosaur6621 it happened to me too
@@jassykat same here
Half of Origins' area was in City.
@@alfiethedinosaur6621 I didn’t play origins growing up but I played the shit out of the other ones so when I finally gave origins a chance I realized it was half the same. It wasn’t like I was playing and never noticed
I love what they did letting you see Gotham before arkham city was built and I love how you can see arkham asylum off in the distance 5 years before asylum happened
Pretty sure it's more then 5 years.
@@nathanfracasse6645 it could be
@@nathanfracasse6645 i think asylum happens 7 or 8 years later something like that
@@BullyMaguirefrom2007movie really that long? Wtf
@@zendariun101 yeah its a really long time
BRUH IF ARKHAM KNIGHT NEVER HAD TANKS I WOULD PLAY IT ALL DAY
BRUH THOSE ARE 7TH GEN GAMES.
@@ZiadMr4 Knight came out exclusively for 8th Gen consoles bruh
*Not never, but definitely they exceed.*
I loved the tanks and batmobile. Come get some
bro i was 11 when i made this comment holy
I went to the Mill in origins today and I realized that I was in the room where you go up into the office and then the joker knocks you back down or whoever. It's nice.
this video is such a visual treat Thank you!
it's amazing just how much the city has changed over the years
Is it weird that I prefer city's art style as opposed to origins...? The inky blacks and blues got changed to dull Grays... Feels more like injustice or the dceu in origins where as city feels like a comic book
City is better because all of the epic fights and messed up structures. What I mean by that is everything in origins looks to perfect to have a Batman game.
It was a newer gotham and Batman just started to the commotion was probably not as bad as it was in City
The Graphics is awesome on origins for Xbox 360.
That Arkham Origins Batsuit though.... Fucking awesome
My favorite
@@KHarrison91939 better than the arkham knight one?
It doesn’t fit the rest of the series though. Why would batman go from wearing heavy tactical armor to fake abs and underwear on the outside? That’s why I always wear the long Halloween skin when I played origins, it makes more sense lore wise that he would wear something like that before asylum.
The reasons that Origins' graphics were not as good as city's is because:
1) wasn't made by rocksteady
2) city didn't have any villains to decorate to buildings (joker with his clowns and balloons)
3) the ps3/xbox 360 were pushed to their limits allowing the player to travel around a much larger Gotham than they did in City
are you stupid? it wasn't made by rocksteady, and that's a reason? villains to decorate to buildings? WHAT!? and the bigger map has NOTHING to do with graphics. Origins looked better.
Origins didn’t look as good because it was meant to be a filler game while rocksteady worked on Arkham Knight. They weren’t trying to make it look like the next best Arkham game.
@@mj3541It ain’t filler though it’s a prequel and Arkham Knight has Some Origin References.
I just recently discovered that Origins is basically Arkham City before it became Arkham City. I am honestly shocked I didn't notice this earlier!
Only North Gotham. South Gotham was a new place entirely.
I kinda want three new games, one gives us the rest of Gotham we didn't see in Origins or Knight, one that does for Knight what Origins did for City, and finally one that has it all playable and we can roam any part of Gotham we want.
@@TheBanishedWindThanks yeah just the North
I love how in Arkham Orgins it was a small part of Gotham city and we get to see it and what it looked like when not destroyed and Before it was turned in a separate city called Arkham city.
I liked Arkham Knight is nowhere near as bad as everyone thinks, it could've been worse.
Edit: Superman 64 and Bat Nipples worse. Just remember that.
For me the gameplay and graphics in Arkham Knight make it the best Arkham game for me. The graphics looked like they were for next gen consoles
Nice..it clearly shows the differences awesome
+Dheeraj S Thanks
The biggest change was the water. Something terrible was going on there and maybe the whole north island was destroyed and then they build it up to the island that we see 9 years later in AC. I really wish they would make 2 games that plays in that time.
Awesome 🤘🍻
Origins has a bigger city but much fewer details. The only visual upgrades are the enhanced shadows, ambient occlusion, and better physx effects on PC.
Due to the limitations of last gen consoles, Origins had to cut corners in details because it wanted to expand the map.
thanks for the info. i guess ima be rebuying it on pc then, in order to get the best experience.
origins expanded the map but it was almost pointless. the second map is completely uninteresting and unremarkable. it’s so cluttered and visually bland, no one can remember their way about it, unlike the other games.
@@JackMorgan06 As I remember it, even the part of the map copied and pasted from Arkham City has also been redone to make it blander and less interesting than before.
The only part of Origins's map that'd left an impression on me is the big new hotel building with some red colors on it. The map design surrounding that hotel is still bland though.
This is now 2015, and Arkham city is still eye candy! If only the port for Arkham knight was this good. :(
2020 here, still eye candy.
Playineth Menards lol damn right it is. 5 years tho...
@@lusack69 2023 and it's better than gotham knights lmaooo
God we need return to Arkham Origins😔
When I first saw the ace chemicals building when I played arkham origins, the nostalgia struck hard, real hard.
2022 and here are again comparing how WB Montreal cannot even come to close to Rocksteady... I remember when this video was posted, feels like it was yesterday... Time sure flies...
ORIGINS!
I'm just so enamored with the history of the place. What happened that caused the buildings near Wonder City to collapse and when did it happen? Why is the Amusement Mile flooded? I'm just so curious.
When Ra´s Al Ghul was loking for more Lazarus beneath arkham city he accidentally destroyed some structures that held Amusement Mil, flooding the area. As the old Gotham is beneath Arkham city, so any earthquake or other thing could do the same
I think it's a reference to a story called Gotham:No man's land
This reminds me about one of the dialogues Arkham city inmates sometimes say: “I remember this place back before they built a wall around it, sucked then too”
Saludos...He jugado los dos juegos y los dos son excelentes...
Arkham city looks alot better ..... at first i tought i am looking at Arkham Knight Lol !
+Shorts POOF City could still pass as a next gen game.
you spelled thought rong
Louis Ortega
WRONG !
+Louis Ortega you spelled wrong wrong
***** Do you even know what you're talking about or are you just copying some useless info from other websites? Also, all 4 games run on THE SAME ENGINE - which is Unreal 3.
I jus realized that Arkham Knight Harley’s costume is basically a fusion of her Arkham Asylum and Arkham City costumes.
Cool video
I might sound stupid but, I had no idea origins had the same map as city
I like City’s more vibrant visual style, and the map is better, but I think Origins did a better job capturing that dark Gotham feel, very similar to Burton’s Gotham and the Animated Series
so many unfinished details on origins, bland patches and textures. I can tell they rushed this game
yeah only game-physics has been upgraded...cape system looks realistic in ao.. otherwise ac is awesome visually
Are you serious? Origins was very good!
A lot of bugs and glitches too
@@diegogarza9321
Are you mad or what? Origins was completely finished! The cutscenes, the boss fights, the character development, the story, the soundtrack, the combat, the new features, the gadgets, the gameplay and it was obviously better than its predecessors! I didn't experience any glitches or bugs in this game. What are you talking about?! It was, is and will be the best game! And it was canon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@@diegogarza9321 you just shut up!
Well we all have our opinions im choosing origans because the have very cool suits and the gameplay runs very smooth for me
I honestly think city is better
Arkham city looks better
agreed
Arkham City actually has interesting places to go
how's that if you got time to tell me how contact me pls twitter.com/Daliyech
graphics: origins
gameplay: city
open world: origins
soundtrack: city
boss fights: origins
story: both
Bane: Origins. Someone had to say it.
@shadow rev agreed, bane was a joke in asylum and city
Open world in City was better. Origins was just grey and snowy crap.
Arkham city had the Gotham skyline and actual colours and no annoying ass bridge to cross.
@@jarlbalgruuf7701 but does city had a grappling hook boost?
@@Ryzen1 yes...
Nice vid
+saul rosenthal thanks!
I have to admit the roads in Origins do look like they are in the process of being lowered. Loads of times the roads just cut off and drop down.
Edit: Now that I'm playing City I find it difficult to believe it's the same city.
Makes me appreciate city little more, asylum still has best overall look
+Brendan Murphy Asylum has more comicbook style to it
arkham city!
Polecasz bardziej Arkham City czy Origins ? Która Twoim zdaniem jest po prostu lepszą grą :) ? Świetny film tak w ogóle :D
Dzięki. City jest wg mnie lepsza ale w Origins grało mi się bardzo dobrze.
I mistakenly skip video till the 2:56 and I was shocked to see origin map had country side and horse's too
Im a big fan at arkham games in arkham knight I went to 200%
The only shitty thing about Origins was the multiplayer mode. And the trophies tied to it.
Where did you get that soundtrack?
City has a better feel to it but I wish they had more snow in it like they did in origins
@This Is What Awesome Looks Like yea I guess but still would’ve looked better
1:43 Gotham City Bank, Wayne Enterprise and W&M towers are missing.
Honestly I like Arkham City's Gotham better
It's foggy and snowing.
Because origins took place years ago dumbass
@@Ryzen1 But Gotham City Bank and Wayne Enterprises were in Gotham since Bruce was a kid (I'm not sure about W&M though), so it should be there in Origins too
All of that is replaced by the map in Arkham Knight anyways so it doesn’t really matter
@@iamgood1484 they are in origins
There's a 8 year gap between origins and city
@@Ahmed-157 in game time...smh
No, it was 9-10 years. In Knight origins is aid to have happened 10 yrs before and city is 9 months before Knight
so many people here mix up "graphics" with "art-style", Origins has a clearly different art-style (more cartoony) when compared to City, Asylum and Knight. This can be seen with the cutscenes even being depicted as cartoonish compared to City's realistic approach; same with the character models etc. They are two different art-styles, it is personal preference, both have good graphics.
The vibrance and color and contrast or City is visually just better.
Honestly, Arkham City had better graphics. Thought the Amour design and detail was better in origins.
+PsychoKlown i remember city graphic more beautiful then on this video but origin its the same
No I wish rocksteady and Wb Montreal would have put like the dark knight returns skin in all of the games. I like that costume of batman. Expect Arkham knight, his costume in that game is good.
At first I thought the graphics were same in both games but the lighting is different.
TeamShowStoppa Spot on.
What was the music, I can't find it
Gotham City Royal Hotel
+Mateusz Wojtkiewicz thank you👍🏻
To me the original Arkham City always felt too blue and bland, ya know? The remaster fixed that luckily with more different colors.
Arkham origins has a simulated winter with fog and it looks like arkham city has more datails (with no fog)
I lost my shit when I spotted Wonder Tower
Also arkham origins and arkham city are the same map but city takes place of 10 years in the future?
Yep
Even if it's been 8 yes since Arkham origins that place changed alot even the size of the buildings was different
One thing I like about origins is that when u take out the enemies they don’t respawn at that exact same location unlike city, I think the developers got lazy there
So there's no monorail in origins?
Nope
iReviewer1486 origins happened before they made the city a.k.a arkham city and also those monorails happened because of fast transportation for the TYGER gaurds...
Numpteez hahaha oh my god this comment was 3 years ago, i already know that hahaha sorry 🤣
Origins is the best game of arkham series very epic boss fights interesting missions very good dlc's like cold cold hearth in my opinion its the best like who agree
I disagree City and Asylum are the best Origins is just a step up from Knight
Asylum is outdated. The combat is bad, gliding, ect.
Joker can be found in Sionis' Mill in Arkham City because he took over Black Mask years ago in Origins...
What is the bad graphics on two of them i want u to choose cuz i have low pc
City looks way more polished. Origins Batman looks like he started a regimen of synthol and graphics are just plain bad, you can see how they tried to use the clouds and snow to cover the city.
Totally agree the game would have been better if they made if for next gen consoles and took another year or two to fix all the glitches and polish the city.
Origins is better
Ronan K he'll yeah
Nah City is better
0:22 the devs got a little lazy here. In Arkham City, the Amusement Mile and everything below it was flooded. It painted a picture that this was once a lived in City, now in its final days. I wish the WBM devs put more time into totally reconstructing the flooded streets beneath rather than just building over it
How did I not realize that arkham city is half the map in origins
City is the best in my opinion
Podem me chamar de louco mas acho que o City ta mais bonito '-'
Lol at these people saying Origins had better graphics, compare the textures on the thugs and inmates in both games and then comeback and tell me if Origins looks better.
I played both games I think they look the same. The thugs look pretty good in origins.
+LegoG Pictures well I'm not done with City yet but telling by everything I saw so far ,Origins has the better thugs
thugs are way more textured in Origins... but yeah whole city looks rich in AC
I understand
Arkham city all the way. It's still my favourite out of the four.
my is to City for the win
Arkahm knight is the best
+Eddie Arnett agreed you have three areas of Gotham and get to ride the batmobile.
Asylum! !!GO FOR IT!!!
J.C. even tho knight is the best one but good option
I prefer the more bleak and dull take on this part of Gotham, it was always intended to be that Shitty part of the City that nobody liked
Origins had the better graphics but I like the City design of Gotham more.
Like with the iceberg lounge you see that Arkham City was completely taken over by those specific villains. In Origins that part of the city which later becomes Arkham is still rather decent. Villains don't show off that much where they are and who they are with their buildings. In City everyone is focusing on showing off "this is my territory " by plastering their signs and such on it.
So, even if I like City more, it's only logical that in Origins Gotham has a more decent look.
Both games are awesome though.
You know what the soundtrack of batman Arkham origins
ARKHAM ORIGINS
lighting on arkham city is way better than what we got on origins...well...the entire game is better actually
They wanted to let Origins look darker,also the dark Outside was ment to be a Blittzard
sorry for my bad English (I'm German,just in case :]).
City is boring...
@@netobolado45 really have you played it origins is
you wish
0:15-0:18 that was different without a 🌁.
so batman arkham origins take place in the past and arkham city take place in the future
Origins looks miles ahead imo
City is in North Gotham, where Batman's parents were killed, and Origins in South Gotham
kuif234
Origins has the same map as Arkham City in addition to the other island, South Gotham.
Just gonna say it, City had the most handsome Batman.
He looked like Buzz Lightyear in Asylum with that chin, he looked like Wolverine in Origins, and in Knight he just looked too old.
That's because he is older in Knight tho
He looks like an 80s Action Figure in City. Arkham Knight and Origins had the Best Looking Bruce’s
What I dont understand is why origins is set before asylum and city but the suit is much more advanced
iwishicouldbefunny Not really more advanced, just more armor looking.
It would make sense for batman to wear alotta armor when hes young, then start taking the armor off as he gets older because he doesnt need it anymore.
@@nathanfracasse6645 he pretty much says this in city. In origins hes more about armoring up and beatingsfkes down....but losing two fistfights with bane made him realize he needs to be more strategic and faster. Once he gains more confidence he sheds the heavier armor for lighter thinner armor. If u notice...in origins you are alot slower...you miss with batarangs...you have a shorter counter window.... and you have way less prowess in combat. You carry more gadgets. In city he tells alfredo more gadgets and armor slowedhim down..so he shed it. It does make sence
Hello buddy from a very bad 2023. If you have not forgotten the password yet, and the nickname from the channel, I wanted to give an idea, cities / places, take from these two parts, and check them in Arkham Knight
Its because batman arkham origins takes place before arkham city
Redwolf169 whatis? I know there are many changes because this part of a city was made into the Arkham City prison, but as I stated in the intro there are many changes to buildings/layout of a city which are not caused by the building of a prison like the location of building changing or some building that are there in the AC and are not there in Origins.
Mateusz Wojtkiewicz oh
Thomas Pieralisi I thought earthquakes are supposed to destroy buildings. But there are "old", hundred year old buildings in City which are not there in Origins.
Thomas Pieralisi for example:
0:45 here the layout is completely different
0:55 here the church tower looks completely different
1:00 - 1:03 the horse stands on a completely different base
1:21 here the metro line is gone from Origins (but I supposed it could've been built inbetween Origins and City so ok
1:42 here, once again, the layout is completely different and the "bridges" look different as well
Thomas Pieralisi ok then ;)
Origins looks better, and is a better game.
Totally agree.
Who payed you to say that and how much. I liked Origins but compared to asylum and city the game is shit yeah it had okayish boss fights but when you consider everything in origins it kinda sucks
Parker Schenck
Origins is better than knight man, better than asylum, not as good as City
AO sucked so hard, it had so many flaws and got things wrong. It is officially the worst Arkham game ever!
Jimmy Halden For you at least, for me Asylum isn't that good. Origins is my number 2 favorite Arkham games, and Asylum is the last.
How big is Origin's map compared to City's map?
Vilest7Creepers About 2x but half of it is City's map just changed slightly.
Origins has more realistic villains and it can be believed as a fan of batman but city's villains are like based on magic which really are dissapointing