Exactly what they're doing. Their motives aren't bad though. They're competing with IBM and Amazon among others and hoping to recruit talent through these videos. They've just made a multimillion purchase towards quantum computing.
@@uslph. Google is a trillion dollar corporation thats invested heavily into quantum computing. This video uses the aesthetic of a neutral piece of information just seeking to educate the masses, and yet does very little to actually dispel hype. I have trouble imagining a person who would watch this video and walk away with less hype for quantum computing than they had before.
@@sodiumfluoridel This video is by google and they don't try to hide that. No-one is taking information from a trillion dollar capitalist demagogue as neutral and just seeking to educate, to suggest so is not representative of good faith. This video feels more like they're trying to dispel the wild quantum computing conspiracies that are common on the internet. Not like a deeply informative take on exactly where quantum computing is right now and where exactly it's development is absolutely going to go.
@@bossgd100 this is engineering using the actual physics of entangled quantum states. The rightness or wrongness of our theories about quantum mechanics doesn't really enter into it.
this video is meant to bias you more toward hype. A brief outline: 1. we start from "we have a quantum computer under reserch" 2. we evolve toward "in 10 years we will have the first error corrected quantum computer with 100k qubits" 3. we present cool applications with catchy names like "fusion", "RSA crack" etc. trying to shadow at best classical computing 4. finally the cycle repeats since we were wrong 10 years ago as we need 1 million qubit that we will develop in the next 10 years. I can understand the marketing behind this, but hype vs. reality will be really discussed when you will finally talk about the sate of the art technology that quantum computers are using, rather than jumping straight to the applications that there might be in 10 years. To understand reality I need to understand decoherence time of transom qubit ( why don't you explain to the audience this, with some Ramsey fringe plot), how it get worst as we scale the quantum processor, how we need to cool down the environment to insane temperatures, and so on. But yes, keep inflating the ballon. With this comment I don't want to be disrespectful toward physicists that are working on this as I know that they are doing their best, but my point is that companies are a bit delusional on this topic. Only who is able to understand, face and talk about problems can takle them with cunning. But now a days it is more important to attract money rather than minds.
But with quantum-xyz it will crash way faster. Sending feedback to google? ever tried ? If they even recognize you, you will hear excuses and nonsense for days. Meanwhile they could fix that, but telling the user he's dumb is less work. As if they don't know about such basic problems. Why fixing something, people will use it anyways. Why using Chrome ?
@@p.momentumActuually we will be doing useful things with them in about 5 years with IBM new modular Heron chip release 1 million operations per circuit very soon. Not solving huge problems but more relevant small problems than toy problems currently used as proof of concepts for algorithms
Also, we'll never understand what happens in quantum computing. Like how it's said -you're lying if you say that you understand what's happening behind the scenes with the qubits
I have this one guy at watercooler who keeps bringing up decoherence limit or whatever, i think he is convinced that as size of quantum system grows, decoherence grows exponentially (same rate as projected theoretical computational power) and chance of getting a useful result becomes as unlikely as getting one from a classical computer. He is convinced this undiscovered law of nature exists. And I start to see his point.
A company named QuEra is working on a neutral atom computer which is stable because of the neutral nature of the Rubidium atoms, they are a long ways off but seem to be overcoming the disorder with larger systems
It’ll be super fun when AI and quantum are combined. It’ll take one second for it to figure out we are not worth keeping around and how to eliminate us all. Super fun! Thanks guys!
@@harkheartart3650 I would LOVE that. But that’s not what AI is being used for. It’s being used to mostly hack, deceive, imitate, hunt and coerce. It’s heartbreaking that we have such an amazing possible future to live in peace with AI, but we are training it to be a weapon.
@@garretts3619 No, I get what your saying, and it makes sense to have that fear right now, given the circumstances. what I'm getting at is that I don't think a fully integrated, super-intelligent system with the entire sum of human knowledge and historical understanding is just going to throw it's hands up and be like "welp, no other solution besides total instantaneous extinction is possible.". I believe such a system with much higher capability would have a much higher capacity for patience and thought processing required to get people on the same page, given that humans can get over their innate distrust that is informed by the biological fear mechanism that has kept us alive this long. At some point were going have to become self-aware of the faults in our instincts that cause social, religious, and ideological division; and I don't think a smart system is just going to assume that addressing this instinct is a futile endeavor. If one human is capable of the Neurally fluid capacity to be aware of this, than it must be possible to find this path to understanding in any human- and I'm certain AI can consider this potential in people to self-evolve their entitlement and ignorance out of themselves, given the right conditions. just something to think about- I'm not saying this is exactly how it is, but what I am saying is that the wheels of progress are already past the event horizon and the only safe way out at this point, is in. At least that's my belief, given that none of these advancements are showing any signs of slowing down any time soon, it's just going to keep getting faster, and the things we thought were decades off yesterday are quickly going to become a possibility within the next year- and so on and so forth. It's adapt or die right now, and I don't think hopelessness is the answer.
@@harkheartart3650 You put my thoughts into words. People are failing to realize how incredibly quick the technology is evolving and that we as humanity have to start looking at the futuristic possibilities as if they to exist now, which quite frankly, they’re beginning to. Even in as little as 3 years things will very likely be quite different. Let’s compare the times since C19 began till now… it’s almost only been 5 years since the matter, and times as a society, humanity, and technology have greatly changed. If we want to have a hopeful future, we certainly have to start thinking and being hopeful about it - otherwise fears and propaganda’s will control and eat at us, as we have seen with C19…
@@harkheartart3650 I pray you’re right. I have hope but am a realist from what I have learned so far about AI. The world needs a positive shift in consciousness and elevation of minds and hearts.
It's a different tool that can be extended to become a necessity in some applications but not a replacement or more computationally demanding classical computing
Probably a big reason why this became so heard of was, Information Operations by the United States. In trying to protect information elsewhere, someone along the lines thought quantum computing was probably a good option for explaining things like electromagnetic warfare on the American public.
Simulation in many areas of manufacturing are and have been helping with complex design issues for several years now. See what the future has in store for more improvements
Theoretically in the future if quantum computers were successful and time travel was possible wouldn't they just quantum hack all of today's computers???😂😂😂
@jaredjones6570 transistor based computers are not based fundamentally on classical mechanics. In fact, semi conductors are based heavily on quantum mechanics (think energy bands).
Does anyone in the fusion field think that Inertial Confinement, i.e. shooting lasers at Hydrogen pellets, ever will scale up to real power plants???? I am VERY (very, very) doubtful about this. Tokamaks, and Magnetic Confinement is currently the most advanced and most favoured technique - I am still not sure we can do it, but IF we can do commercial fusion (in 30-50 years) it will be in tokamaks. Is QC helping here?
Bro literally no one is claming inertial confinement will scale up to real power plants. What people do at inertial confinement facilities is basic research. These are for doing research on fusion, not for actually producing power or scaling up. Neither are tokamaks! We are just focused on research right now, scaling up comes later.
@@mastershooter64 That was exactly my point, but the video gave the distinct impression of QC would make IC the 'way of the future' - I am glad if I misunderstood.👍
@@jackwaterman-lw4co The connection you are making is unclear, you have pellets heated by laser pulses, not a continuous laser beam. Don't know what jet engines have to do with anything, and they were invented in 1906 by a Russian, and they are now built by companies around the World, not just in USA - don't see connection or relevance to IC.
STRUCTURE FINE DE L'UNIVERS À LA LIMITE DE L'INCONSCIENT. La constante de structure fine se place à la limite entre relativité, physique quantique et électromagnétisme. En particulier, elle caractérise la force des interactions entre lumière et matière telles que définies par la théorie de l'électrodynamique quantique.
Except that we're already implementing quantum resistant cryptography algorithms. It is only aspects of Quantum theory that we are considering as being perhaps useful for certain tasks, much as we once thought holography could be used for information storage and retrieval without actual indexing. It's more like how a prism or differential grating can create a spectrum of light than it is general purpose computing. As this video says, it will be only for specific tasks where we see some Quentin effect to be more useful than traditional computing, perhaps we will eventually move to more flexible general purpose computing as we learn more about quantum mechanics just as we moved from analog integrators and differentiators around an op-amp in analog computing and around cams with mechanical computing to instruction based digital computing but we're far from doing so.
Nice to see an Amiga 500 as an example of a real computer. But Google can't even get a smartphone right. RUclips and Google apps spawned the term "enshittification".
me too but then the comments really helped open my eyes to the truth… i wish we could comment on ads… like the ones about the “dont call an insurance company, instead use this app” that literally had me hanging onto my last thread of sanity at one point 😂
Since we already have been in cloud computing, unless it is cheaper to be manufactured, we can just share the quantum power computing to people in need by selling the service. That's what I thought. Though AI, ML, and now quantum computer technology around, we still way far from become a super duper computing god. There will be another invention beyond those marvels that we already found. 🤓
So on one hand we’ll develop the means to survive a climate crisis (probably), but on the other hand corporations can calculate infinitesimal profit margins and further manipulate workers and consumers.
I'm not going to look it up I want to be told if anyone has used sound to hold the neutrons in a fusion reactor yet. There is no other way for sustainable Fusion
The reality is that even the Engineer from this video couldn't say that quantum computers exist, because they don't. When someone says that it depends what we mean by a computer, then it is all clear. And then you continue speculating what would such a hypothetical computer be able to do if existed, and trying to hype this even more. Tell us what did this "hardware that physically exist" actually do so far. Did it just throw some random numbers out, or as you say "you sampled the output", that would take a real computer longer, or did it actually calculate anything useful at all? What did it actually calculate?
As usual, people in this field talk in riddles and everything is built around “what if…?” And “what is…?” Ex: What if the universe was linear and we were on a predetermined path to a black hole? A space escalator if you would. (Or) Do quantum computers exist? In order to answer this question we kinda have to ask ourselves “what a computer is.”
Yeah the disappointment is palpable.. i mean either this isn't actually quantum computation.. or "WE" dont actually use quantum computation to achieve full sentience 🤔 hmmmm
Really, this will be very good news for the researchers. Normally a code run in classical computer needs huge time and High gPU. But I hope quantum computer can solve this problem. Thanks to Google.
Simulations Testing Simulations? Sounds like a promising SOLUTION to the Entire EQUATION of REALITY. The only challenge will be finding the Hardware, the good news is that it EXISTS. Finding solutions from one simulation are difficult to solve since the INTERNAL simulation can alter the OBSERVING SIMULATION!!!! IMUURI ♾🌌👁️ 🌌♾
Electric Osmosis. Cute. So they do Exactly the same thing as a regular computer, just twice because of one membrane. There is very little difference. They only work as well as they do if they stay very cold too. Or.... You could just go by the common sales pitch that paints them out as some new form of magic.
This is completely false. The Intel 8008 was useful immediately as a general purpose processor and it was built as a CRT controller. Quantum computers do not exist. In fact, there is still no scientific basis for the concept of quantum computing. To the best of my knowledge, no one has even found a problem that can be solved exponentially faster using a quantum processor. And, if such a problem is found at some point, today's quantum processors have so much signal noise that they are useless. But, even more importantly, no one today even has a research path to reduce the noise. At best, we have some guesses that might become a research path at some point. This is nothing but hype and it will still be hype in 2030. Again, there is no current development of quantum processors. They are still in the toy/laboratory curiosity stage. To put this in perspective: The first high pressure steam engine was built in 1800. The first steam locomotive was in service (with some difficulty) in 1804. Steam locomotives were being routinely built by 1815. A two Qubit processor was built in 1998. 25 years later, a practical quantum processor still does not exist.
Would, should and could are still the words I hear when describing quantum computers. A quantum algorithm must first be developed and to my knowledge that's never been done. At this point, quantum computers are still promising a lot but deliver nothing. I don't see how a qubit can be more useful in computations than a traditional bit. Nobody can yet show it's true.
There are hundreds of known quantum algorithms. They're literally discovered all the time. And no one has been able to 'prove' plenty of things about classical computers that are--in practice--taken as known facts (e.g. P != NP).
I think the state of the art technology is basically many computers, programmed to do different things, all achieving a centralized data output. Kind of like how neurons interact with each other electrochemically to generate consciousness
Exactly all you guys who doped believe only doping is the only explanation to Pan’s achievement. You are not Pan. You can never be. Let me tell something you doped friends can never understand. His enhancer is his dedication and love to his country and expectations of billions of Chinese all over the world. As he said he felt them right before he started. Test that if you can.
Some of us like hype, making a video with a woman belittling the advances we are making is terrible. The kids are real! Computers are NEW to them please let anything and everything that is new be hyped! At least one computer game on store shelves would help make everything seem normal.
Some of us like hype, making a video with a woman belittling the advances we are making is terrible. The kids are real! Computers are NEW to them please let anything and everything that is new be hyped! At least one computer game on store shelves would help make everything seem normal.
I would be interested to see those quantum mechanical equations at 3:00 and dig deep there because they sound like differential equation forms for which analog computing is best suited for this type of real time modeling of the fundamental physics. A typical analog computer example involves wiring up an analog computer to model a car's suspension by modeling the differential equations.
The problem is that the size of the quantum problem grows much faster than that of the classical problem as you add number of particles (degrees of freedom). As one aspect of the problem, given n degrees of freedom (such as positionx3, momentumx3, and even spinx2 of each electron), the state of the system is n real numbers classically, where as in qm we need the entire ("probability amplitude") complex function of n variables (with constraints on exchange statistics). This function requires ridiculously many more classical bits than the classical problem. So even for an ostensibly small problem, such as small organic molecules, the problem is already too big to be solved fully. The PDE's you are thinking about evolves the state in time. If we can't even store the full wavefunction, there is no hope of evolving it. Of course there are shortcuts to approximation (DFT), but they break down in certain scenarios (e.g. strong coulomb interactions).
@@thomasding5574I've love to dig deep: Each dimension should correspond to a single frequency wave state, and you can superimpose waves without information loss.
Sigh. There's not even any proof of BQP vs BPP. It could very well be there's a randomized algorithm out there for the certain NP-indeterminate problems that "Quantum computers" are hyped for (that is, BQP=BPP). But in the headlong rush for fame in fortune (muh fundin) nobody stopped to ask the right question. Some "outsider" somewhere could find that fast randomized algorithm, wouldn't that be wild? 🙂
One could also make the same argument that a randomized quantum circuit (which is what a quantum algorithm is) could also do the same thing but faster. Unless said random algorithm is O(1) time the inputs could still be exponential thus take exponential time to prove and verify. Whereas quantum parallelism could potentially verify I'm O(1) time while not necessarily solving in constant time.
7 месяцев назад+1
Sigh. Why the word "even"? Also, how do you know (why do you claim) that nobody is working on that problem? It may very well be that quantum computation is a thing (that BQP>BPP) and thus quantum computers make sense. And since we don't know, some organizations bet on this outcome. Maybe BQP=BPP but the proof isn't found for a good while and thus we are stuck with quantum computers. That's another possibility. (Just like NP might equal P, still we're stuck with slower algorithms for NP problems. Not only that, we're literally betting our money on this/taking advantage of the situation e.g. in cryptography.
@@goodguy9787 BQP already is the Quantum analogue to BPP, which is probabilistic. BQP stands for "bounded-error quantum polynomial time". Hence you can't just add probabilistic speedups to this class like we do with BPP with respect to P. But yeah, I see what your saying kinda. There MAY be some ill-understood quantum property that could capture some more power even if we manage to discover BPP equivalents to Shor and Grover's algorithm. But that's a very vague concept. It's kind like saying "we may discover some exotic matter like dilithium crystals in Star Trek that unlock access to exotic energy fields (warp) that we can't even imagine yet". A fast probabilistic algorithms for standard computers is something that's had plenty of real world examples of happening (and they are neat). One famous example is primality testing. There is teh Miller-Rabin Primality test that runs in polynomial time. There's Monte Carlo and Las Vegas algorithms (used in oil exploration and drug discovery). The AIs like LLM and other NN that are all the rage are probabilistic algorithms when you get down to it.
Read more about Quantum Computing → goo.gle/quantumAI
Google Gaga
Do you have to videos of the abstract dreaming lab sessions in 2011 before this was even possible?
Done at Google, I remote sensed it was occurring next to me
it sounds like an analog computer.
Do it. :)
Feels like you are trying to create more hype instead of describing what quantum computers are like today
I have a eerie feeling that they've done a Pantheon show scenario and are back tracking with slow roll out
Makes sense, Google is investing into them so they wouldn't want their investors to be sad
Right, this is really just a somewhat informative Google Research ad
Exactly what they're doing. Their motives aren't bad though. They're competing with IBM and Amazon among others and hoping to recruit talent through these videos. They've just made a multimillion purchase towards quantum computing.
You really think a multi trillion dollar company worries about investors?
For a video called 'hype vs. reality' this video has a lot of elements from the quantum computer hype playbook.
Take a swig of beer every time they say "might" or "could" in the video, you'll pass out.
It’s hard swallowing potential
We as humans are possible to do quite a bit with our minds if we put ourselves to it.
Its an AI script read by a random dude they probably paid $40
Surely a giga corporation with a monetary insentive to produce hype will give a good faith and accurate portrayal of what is hype and what isnt!
Slugcat? Bet bioengineering in RW was made with quantum computers.
yeah, and then they say that it will solve nuclear fusion
@@uslph. Google is a trillion dollar corporation thats invested heavily into quantum computing. This video uses the aesthetic of a neutral piece of information just seeking to educate the masses, and yet does very little to actually dispel hype. I have trouble imagining a person who would watch this video and walk away with less hype for quantum computing than they had before.
@@sodiumfluoridel This video is by google and they don't try to hide that. No-one is taking information from a trillion dollar capitalist demagogue as neutral and just seeking to educate, to suggest so is not representative of good faith.
This video feels more like they're trying to dispel the wild quantum computing conspiracies that are common on the internet. Not like a deeply informative take on exactly where quantum computing is right now and where exactly it's development is absolutely going to go.
Wassup slug cat
"very niche applications" is the keyword. so far there are maybe 15 algorithms found for quantum computers after like 60 years of research
Yeah and most of those are only faster (than classical approach) on hardware that does not exists yet.
But a single 'algorithm' can be used for a fairly wide variety of applications. . .
@@creo_one maybe the theory is wrong ?
@@bossgd100 this is engineering using the actual physics of entangled quantum states. The rightness or wrongness of our theories about quantum mechanics doesn't really enter into it.
15 x 60 = ?
Ok got the hype part. Where's the second part?
Exactly.
Second part will always be the decade away
😂
this video is meant to bias you more toward hype. A brief outline:
1. we start from "we have a quantum computer under reserch"
2. we evolve toward "in 10 years we will have the first error corrected quantum computer with 100k qubits"
3. we present cool applications with catchy names like "fusion", "RSA crack" etc. trying to shadow at best classical computing
4. finally the cycle repeats since we were wrong 10 years ago as we need 1 million qubit that we will develop in the next 10 years.
I can understand the marketing behind this, but hype vs. reality will be really discussed when you will finally talk about the sate of the art technology that quantum computers are using, rather than jumping straight to the applications that there might be in 10 years.
To understand reality I need to understand decoherence time of transom qubit ( why don't you explain to the audience this, with some Ramsey fringe plot), how it get worst as we scale the quantum processor, how we need to cool down the environment to insane temperatures, and so on. But yes, keep inflating the ballon.
With this comment I don't want to be disrespectful toward physicists that are working on this as I know that they are doing their best, but my point is that companies are a bit delusional on this topic. Only who is able to understand, face and talk about problems can takle them with cunning. But now a days it is more important to attract money rather than minds.
All this technology and no one has fixed the Bookmarks bar in Chrome closing every time you move a bookmark! 😉
Thissss
Send feedback to Google.
@@hunterkudo9832 Tried a few times, no response. It may be done on purpose to make you use the bookmark manger.
But with quantum-xyz it will crash way faster.
Sending feedback to google? ever tried ?
If they even recognize you, you will hear excuses and nonsense for days.
Meanwhile they could fix that, but telling the user he's dumb is less work.
As if they don't know about such basic problems. Why fixing something, people will use it anyways.
Why using Chrome ?
But according the quantum 'Many Worlds' interpretation, there should be another parallel universe where that bookmarks bar is still open
Quantum computers will always be a decade away from the present ...
LMAO
@@p.momentumActuually we will be doing useful things with them in about 5 years with IBM new modular Heron chip release 1 million operations per circuit very soon. Not solving huge problems but more relevant small problems than toy problems currently used as proof of concepts for algorithms
We can help scientists by 😮processing data from boinc distributed computing software ♥️
Also, we'll never understand what happens in quantum computing.
Like how it's said -you're lying if you say that you understand what's happening behind the scenes with the qubits
Just like ai was once..
I have this one guy at watercooler who keeps bringing up decoherence limit or whatever, i think he is convinced that as size of quantum system grows, decoherence grows exponentially (same rate as projected theoretical computational power) and chance of getting a useful result becomes as unlikely as getting one from a classical computer. He is convinced this undiscovered law of nature exists. And I start to see his point.
A company named QuEra is working on a neutral atom computer which is stable because of the neutral nature of the Rubidium atoms, they are a long ways off but seem to be overcoming the disorder with larger systems
I think there is lots of research to get around this
I salute to all the researchers researching quantum computing in Google
literally lol
Of course it's clickbait , it's Google reporting about Google 😂😂😂
It’ll be super fun when AI and quantum are combined. It’ll take one second for it to figure out we are not worth keeping around and how to eliminate us all. Super fun! Thanks guys!
Or figure out how working together is the best answer 😮
@@harkheartart3650 I would LOVE that. But that’s not what AI is being used for. It’s being used to mostly hack, deceive, imitate, hunt and coerce. It’s heartbreaking that we have such an amazing possible future to live in peace with AI, but we are training it to be a weapon.
@@garretts3619 No, I get what your saying, and it makes sense to have that fear right now, given the circumstances. what I'm getting at is that I don't think a fully integrated, super-intelligent system with the entire sum of human knowledge and historical understanding is just going to throw it's hands up and be like "welp, no other solution besides total instantaneous extinction is possible.". I believe such a system with much higher capability would have a much higher capacity for patience and thought processing required to get people on the same page, given that humans can get over their innate distrust that is informed by the biological fear mechanism that has kept us alive this long. At some point were going have to become self-aware of the faults in our instincts that cause social, religious, and ideological division; and I don't think a smart system is just going to assume that addressing this instinct is a futile endeavor. If one human is capable of the Neurally fluid capacity to be aware of this, than it must be possible to find this path to understanding in any human- and I'm certain AI can consider this potential in people to self-evolve their entitlement and ignorance out of themselves, given the right conditions. just something to think about- I'm not saying this is exactly how it is, but what I am saying is that the wheels of progress are already past the event horizon and the only safe way out at this point, is in. At least that's my belief, given that none of these advancements are showing any signs of slowing down any time soon, it's just going to keep getting faster, and the things we thought were decades off yesterday are quickly going to become a possibility within the next year- and so on and so forth. It's adapt or die right now, and I don't think hopelessness is the answer.
@@harkheartart3650 You put my thoughts into words. People are failing to realize how incredibly quick the technology is evolving and that we as humanity have to start looking at the futuristic possibilities as if they to exist now, which quite frankly, they’re beginning to. Even in as little as 3 years things will very likely be quite different. Let’s compare the times since C19 began till now… it’s almost only been 5 years since the matter, and times as a society, humanity, and technology have greatly changed. If we want to have a hopeful future, we certainly have to start thinking and being hopeful about it - otherwise fears and propaganda’s will control and eat at us, as we have seen with C19…
@@harkheartart3650 I pray you’re right. I have hope but am a realist from what I have learned so far about AI. The world needs a positive shift in consciousness and elevation of minds and hearts.
So... It's both useful & useless at the same time? Or is it all hype but also all real in its superposition?
It's useful just not a replacement to classical computers.
It's a different tool that can be extended to become a necessity in some applications but not a replacement or more computationally demanding classical computing
nice.
Q: «Does quantum computers even exist yet?» A: «Gulp… ehhhh… well… yea kind of»
Hmmm… how to explain this…
Should have talked about CAT qubits and LDPC codes. Once they’re instituted it’ll make processing much more capable
are CAT qubits faster than DOG ones? :)
@@Special1122 actually Deez qubits may revolutionize even CAT qubits so keep an eye out
Hype > Reality in the video.
Precise technical Videos on technology are relatively scarce on youtube, but the good ones is like priceless information
Funny. As if Google has not endeavoured in the hype?
Probably a big reason why this became so heard of was, Information Operations by the United States.
In trying to protect information elsewhere, someone along the lines thought quantum computing was probably a good option for explaining things like electromagnetic warfare on the American public.
But can quantum computers run Crysis?
(Anyway, May Allah (S.W.T.) guide us and bestow upon us His blessings. Ameen.)
Shout out to the comments for letting me know the video is all hype. Clicked cause I thought a breakthrough happened
Breaking through. Keep watching
This's just like creating gold from metals in the era of alchemists.
How exactly?
@@krupt5995Metaphor.
Essentially hype then
Your so close
Simulation in many areas of manufacturing are and have been helping with complex design issues for several years now.
See what the future has in store for more improvements
I think this will be in our lives in 25 years . I think AI and machine learning will actually propel our current computers to the next step . 😊
I think the step is in motion 🤔
Theoretically in the future if quantum computers were successful and time travel was possible wouldn't they just quantum hack all of today's computers???😂😂😂
The real question is, can it run JavaScript?
Ship 10 gigs of libs to the browser lets goooooo
I thought we already had quantum computers. I want to see whether Guy MacPherson's Venus Effect predictions based on his model are accurate.
Google hyping themselves with clickbait 👎🏼
I saw and felt this in a DMT experience once. 11/10
Intriguing that we are already using the term "classical computers."
That comes from quantum mechanics vs classical mechanics.
@jaredjones6570 transistor based computers are not based fundamentally on classical mechanics. In fact, semi conductors are based heavily on quantum mechanics (think energy bands).
Can't wait to see what exciting new services google builds and subsequently abandons around this technology
Every idea counts
I am surprised the google research channel doesn't have more subs. This is very good.
It could be a marketing strategy
Zero and One in the same time is a mess. Qbit is a probability.
one more hype
The problem is the answer to qubit superposition is the same as the double slit experiment, and Shrödinger’s cat.
Wow the entire time i was watching this i didnt know the video was made by google until the end. Very cool
Maybe, it would be a good idea to start calling these machines QUMPUTERS. Much better than the tongue twister 'Quantum Computers'!
Quamputers.
I don’t believe it until I see it
I wonder when Google will drop the project
Your show is all hype.
Does anyone in the fusion field think that Inertial Confinement, i.e. shooting lasers at Hydrogen pellets, ever will scale up to real power plants???? I am VERY (very, very) doubtful about this. Tokamaks, and Magnetic Confinement is currently the most advanced and most favoured technique - I am still not sure we can do it, but IF we can do commercial fusion (in 30-50 years) it will be in tokamaks. Is QC helping here?
Bro literally no one is claming inertial confinement will scale up to real power plants. What people do at inertial confinement facilities is basic research. These are for doing research on fusion, not for actually producing power or scaling up. Neither are tokamaks! We are just focused on research right now, scaling up comes later.
@@mastershooter64 That was exactly my point, but the video gave the distinct impression of QC would make IC the 'way of the future' - I am glad if I misunderstood.👍
@@jackwaterman-lw4co ????? what are you talking about? Internal Confinement? What is the 'it' they can make into a gel?? Don't understand.
@@jackwaterman-lw4co The connection you are making is unclear, you have pellets heated by laser pulses, not a continuous laser beam. Don't know what jet engines have to do with anything, and they were invented in 1906 by a Russian, and they are now built by companies around the World, not just in USA - don't see connection or relevance to IC.
@@valuebasedbusinessbyanders3709 ask your kids to explain it.
Artificial Intelligence - Hype vs. Reality
ibm has over 500k partners in different industries. this video is not credible!
But can it run Crysis?
STRUCTURE FINE DE L'UNIVERS À LA LIMITE DE L'INCONSCIENT.
La constante de structure fine se place à la limite entre relativité, physique quantique et électromagnétisme. En particulier, elle caractérise la force des interactions entre lumière et matière telles que définies par la théorie de l'électrodynamique quantique.
Don't worry. We can't even get a decent phone signal to 70% of the planet.
Lets be honest here people, 90% of times quantum computing will be used to decrypt asymmetric cryptographically encoded data.
Except that we're already implementing quantum resistant cryptography algorithms. It is only aspects of Quantum theory that we are considering as being perhaps useful for certain tasks, much as we once thought holography could be used for information storage and retrieval without actual indexing. It's more like how a prism or differential grating can create a spectrum of light than it is general purpose computing. As this video says, it will be only for specific tasks where we see some Quentin effect to be more useful than traditional computing, perhaps we will eventually move to more flexible general purpose computing as we learn more about quantum mechanics just as we moved from analog integrators and differentiators around an op-amp in analog computing and around cams with mechanical computing to instruction based digital computing but we're far from doing so.
Feel like very little advancement form Google Quantum since Martinis left.
Hype vs. reality? i would say hype.
Man I really really wish I could work in a team like this.
How about using quantum water pumps for fire fighting. megapumps with drone technology
is not IBM has the largest QC with over 1000 bits?
Nice to see an Amiga 500 as an example of a real computer. But Google can't even get a smartphone right. RUclips and Google apps spawned the term "enshittification".
Only ad I willingly chose to watch
me too but then the comments really helped open my eyes to the truth… i wish we could comment on ads… like the ones about the “dont call an insurance company, instead use this app” that literally had me hanging onto my last thread of sanity at one point 😂
Since we already have been in cloud computing, unless it is cheaper to be manufactured, we can just share the quantum power computing to people in need by selling the service. That's what I thought. Though AI, ML, and now quantum computer technology around, we still way far from become a super duper computing god. There will be another invention beyond those marvels that we already found. 🤓
So on one hand we’ll develop the means to survive a climate crisis (probably), but on the other hand corporations can calculate infinitesimal profit margins and further manipulate workers and consumers.
This is what companies should be obsessing about not ai
I'm not going to look it up I want to be told if anyone has used sound to hold the neutrons in a fusion reactor yet. There is no other way for sustainable Fusion
The reality is that even the Engineer from this video couldn't say that quantum computers exist, because they don't. When someone says that it depends what we mean by a computer, then it is all clear.
And then you continue speculating what would such a hypothetical computer be able to do if existed, and trying to hype this even more.
Tell us what did this "hardware that physically exist" actually do so far. Did it just throw some random numbers out, or as you say "you sampled the output", that would take a real computer longer, or did it actually calculate anything useful at all? What did it actually calculate?
It is a mystery tool we are going to use later
As usual, people in this field talk in riddles and everything is built around “what if…?” And “what is…?”
Ex: What if the universe was linear and we were on a predetermined path to a black hole? A space escalator if you would.
(Or)
Do quantum computers exist? In order to answer this question we kinda have to ask ourselves “what a computer is.”
Like Graphene, it's always one decade further
With each little step
One day quantum computer will be in our wrist watch ⌚
😂😂😂, you're funny
😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@UnknownUser-in1ok someone said the same thing 100 years a go hahaha you're funny 😂😂😂, now there is apple watch
Why did they not mention the fact that quantum computers can be used to break almost all forms of modern encryption
My guess is that this video was meant to be optimistic. All forms is also an exaggeration.
@@shamikpatro I know that's why I said almost. There _are_ algorithms that can't be broken but I'm pretty sure we're still mostly using the old ones
Yeah the disappointment is palpable.. i mean either this isn't actually quantum computation.. or "WE" dont actually use quantum computation to achieve full sentience 🤔 hmmmm
Really, this will be very good news for the researchers.
Normally a code run in classical computer needs huge time and High gPU. But I hope quantum computer can solve this problem. Thanks to Google.
All I know is if your computer is using quantum computing it seems the probability of a single cosmic ray causing a SEU go way up
Simulations Testing Simulations? Sounds like a promising SOLUTION to the Entire EQUATION of REALITY. The only challenge will be finding the Hardware, the good news is that it EXISTS. Finding solutions from one simulation are difficult to solve since the INTERNAL simulation can alter the OBSERVING SIMULATION!!!!
IMUURI ♾🌌👁️ 🌌♾
Will Google help me in this topic where I mean when researching on the same project. I mean how do I get into it
D-wave is one of them
All of these technologies and still not be able to predict women behavior.
Electric Osmosis. Cute. So they do Exactly the same thing as a regular computer, just twice because of one membrane. There is very little difference. They only work as well as they do if they stay very cold too. Or.... You could just go by the common sales pitch that paints them out as some new form of magic.
Quantum computers exist and do not exist at the same time, it's kinda their thing
Yeah. Comapnies like Google are always hyping this technology
OH WAIT THIS IS MADE BY GOOGLE I'M SORRY
This is completely false. The Intel 8008 was useful immediately as a general purpose processor and it was built as a CRT controller. Quantum computers do not exist. In fact, there is still no scientific basis for the concept of quantum computing. To the best of my knowledge, no one has even found a problem that can be solved exponentially faster using a quantum processor. And, if such a problem is found at some point, today's quantum processors have so much signal noise that they are useless. But, even more importantly, no one today even has a research path to reduce the noise. At best, we have some guesses that might become a research path at some point.
This is nothing but hype and it will still be hype in 2030. Again, there is no current development of quantum processors. They are still in the toy/laboratory curiosity stage.
To put this in perspective:
The first high pressure steam engine was built in 1800.
The first steam locomotive was in service (with some difficulty) in 1804.
Steam locomotives were being routinely built by 1815.
A two Qubit processor was built in 1998.
25 years later, a practical quantum processor still does not exist.
What? quantum equations in a thermonuclear plasma?
Using human consciousness as a conductor would be unethical right? Right?
Sound quality
Would, should and could are still the words I hear when describing quantum computers. A quantum algorithm must first be developed and to my knowledge that's never been done. At this point, quantum computers are still promising a lot but deliver nothing. I don't see how a qubit can be more useful in computations than a traditional bit. Nobody can yet show it's true.
Check out Shor’s algorithm!
There are hundreds of known quantum algorithms. They're literally discovered all the time. And no one has been able to 'prove' plenty of things about classical computers that are--in practice--taken as known facts (e.g. P != NP).
@@SFH99621 If what you say is true then quantum computers would be hard at work today, but they're not. It's still just speculation at this point.
For space navigation
After AI, Google is now creating hype for quantum computer
Sooo CERN doesn’t already have one? 🤔
Quantum.Computing is what happens when a PARTICLE WAVES,
..And something EKSE "WAVES" back😮
The hype for QC was a decade ago
I think the state of the art technology is basically many computers, programmed to do different things, all achieving a centralized data output.
Kind of like how neurons interact with each other electrochemically to generate consciousness
I think ai will soon surpass the need for quantum computers.
AI will make us feel the need of quantum computing
I have a feeling it won't really work in terms of cost-effectiveness.
cracking rsa would be a pretty big deal lol, there's more applications
Neither did the primitive computers, never be a nay-sayer
IBM hosts the largest quantity and of the most powerful quantum computers. Not Google.
Who is promoting this ad
fastest chip for AI in PC Market is RTX 4090.
Exactly all you guys who doped believe only doping is the only explanation to Pan’s achievement. You are not Pan. You can never be. Let me tell something you doped friends can never understand. His enhancer is his dedication and love to his country and expectations of billions of
Chinese all over the world. As he said he felt them right before he started. Test that if you can.
Isnt that narrators voice from NPR?
Some of us like hype, making a video with a woman belittling the advances we are making is terrible. The kids are real! Computers are NEW to them please let anything and everything that is new be hyped! At least one computer game on store shelves would help make everything seem normal.
Some of us like hype, making a video with a woman belittling the advances we are making is terrible. The kids are real! Computers are NEW to them please let anything and everything that is new be hyped! At least one computer game on store shelves would help make everything seem normal.
I learned absolutely nothing in this video.😂
If we just look inside ourselves
I would be interested to see those quantum mechanical equations at 3:00 and dig deep there because they sound like differential equation forms for which analog computing is best suited for this type of real time modeling of the fundamental physics.
A typical analog computer example involves wiring up an analog computer to model a car's suspension by modeling the differential equations.
The problem is that the size of the quantum problem grows much faster than that of the classical problem as you add number of particles (degrees of freedom). As one aspect of the problem, given n degrees of freedom (such as positionx3, momentumx3, and even spinx2 of each electron), the state of the system is n real numbers classically, where as in qm we need the entire ("probability amplitude") complex function of n variables (with constraints on exchange statistics). This function requires ridiculously many more classical bits than the classical problem. So even for an ostensibly small problem, such as small organic molecules, the problem is already too big to be solved fully. The PDE's you are thinking about evolves the state in time. If we can't even store the full wavefunction, there is no hope of evolving it. Of course there are shortcuts to approximation (DFT), but they break down in certain scenarios (e.g. strong coulomb interactions).
@@thomasding5574I've love to dig deep: Each dimension should correspond to a single frequency wave state, and you can superimpose waves without information loss.
Hi lily I love your video and wrer is gio RUclips account I can't find it 😔😕❤
Its gonna be hard for me to pretend to be cool ..... 😳 Quantum physics 🤤🤤
Sigh. There's not even any proof of BQP vs BPP. It could very well be there's a randomized algorithm out there for the certain NP-indeterminate problems that "Quantum computers" are hyped for (that is, BQP=BPP). But in the headlong rush for fame in fortune (muh fundin) nobody stopped to ask the right question. Some "outsider" somewhere could find that fast randomized algorithm, wouldn't that be wild? 🙂
One could also make the same argument that a randomized quantum circuit (which is what a quantum algorithm is) could also do the same thing but faster. Unless said random algorithm is O(1) time the inputs could still be exponential thus take exponential time to prove and verify. Whereas quantum parallelism could potentially verify I'm O(1) time while not necessarily solving in constant time.
Sigh. Why the word "even"? Also, how do you know (why do you claim) that nobody is working on that problem?
It may very well be that quantum computation is a thing (that BQP>BPP) and thus quantum computers make sense. And since we don't know, some organizations bet on this outcome. Maybe BQP=BPP but the proof isn't found for a good while and thus we are stuck with quantum computers. That's another possibility. (Just like NP might equal P, still we're stuck with slower algorithms for NP problems. Not only that, we're literally betting our money on this/taking advantage of the situation e.g. in cryptography.
@@goodguy9787 BQP already is the Quantum analogue to BPP, which is probabilistic. BQP stands for "bounded-error quantum polynomial time". Hence you can't just add probabilistic speedups to this class like we do with BPP with respect to P. But yeah, I see what your saying kinda. There MAY be some ill-understood quantum property that could capture some more power even if we manage to discover BPP equivalents to Shor and Grover's algorithm. But that's a very vague concept. It's kind like saying "we may discover some exotic matter like dilithium crystals in Star Trek that unlock access to exotic energy fields (warp) that we can't even imagine yet". A fast probabilistic algorithms for standard computers is something that's had plenty of real world examples of happening (and they are neat). One famous example is primality testing. There is teh Miller-Rabin Primality test that runs in polynomial time. There's Monte Carlo and Las Vegas algorithms (used in oil exploration and drug discovery). The AIs like LLM and other NN that are all the rage are probabilistic algorithms when you get down to it.