A. Shaikh Lecture 1/5: Foundations of Classical Keynesian Political Economy

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 окт 2024
  • Lecture 1: Foundations of Classical Keynesian Political Economy
    1. Theoretical Foundations
    2. Structural Patterns in Advanced Capitalism

Комментарии • 16

  • @souritdey9450
    @souritdey9450 4 года назад +9

    This is just brilliant! Thank you UMass Econ department for uploading this for wider dissemination.

  • @RushuFriends
    @RushuFriends 6 лет назад +6

    Thank god some new content

  • @ekta9197
    @ekta9197 6 лет назад +2

    May I ask the name of the book he mentioned?

    • @01Tanthallas
      @01Tanthallas 6 лет назад +4

      Kashif Khan Capitalism: competition, conflict, and crises

    • @ekta9197
      @ekta9197 6 лет назад +3

      Steve Marangos thnk u so much :)

  • @ben-dr3wf
    @ben-dr3wf 6 лет назад +1

    Shaikh's classification of Post Keynesians as dealing with imperfect competition, thereby subscribing to the category of 'perfect and imperfect' competitions advanced by neo-classical theories, is not not convincing. Keynes himself does not make his theory based on perfect or imperfect competition.

    • @skeley1546
      @skeley1546 4 года назад +4

      ruclips.net/video/ShIg-3NRQj4/видео.htmlm45s

    • @nickolasrobert7340
      @nickolasrobert7340 Год назад

      Post Keynesian theory is not "pure Keynes"

  • @orkeer
    @orkeer 6 лет назад

    Is he a post-keynesian? I have read a few papers by him, but I'm not sure where to put him, in what school of thought..

    • @tibiasucks1
      @tibiasucks1 6 лет назад +7

      I believe he considers himself a classical political economst (School of Smith, Ricardo and Marx). He criticises post-keynesians a lot, and argues that his concept of real competition to be the proper foundation to Keynes' ideas.

    • @wiegraf9009
      @wiegraf9009 6 лет назад +7

      He is a Sraffian and Marxist. Definitely not a Post-Keynesian.

    • @01Tanthallas
      @01Tanthallas 6 лет назад +2

      Classical political economist.

    • @ben-dr3wf
      @ben-dr3wf 6 лет назад

      Shaikh's classification of Post Keynesians as dealing with imperfect competition, thereby subscribing to the category of 'perfect and imperfect' competitions advanced by neo-classical theories, is not not convincing. Keynes himsell does not make his theory based on perfect or imperfect competition.

    • @nickolasrobert7340
      @nickolasrobert7340 Год назад +1

      Classical/Neo-ricardian with a little bit of Marxism.