Smith, Ricardo and Marx were political economists and moral philosophers. It is sad that Henry George is absent from this group, considering that George made huge contributions in correcting the errors of logic and observations made by his predecessors and contemporaries. George would have done the same with Marx had Marx's works been available in English at the time. George's book "The Science of Political Economy" is a book that should be added to the works studied for such a course.
No, no. He has no realistic idea of neoclassical economics. Tell me, what is the heterodox theory of monopoly? He is typical of current anti ..... nonsense. He doesn’t like something and tries to undermine it by he thinks technical arguments. This is rather weak. He should concentrate on reality and thereby pro capitalistic policies. He’s a typical confusing and confused critique.We all know that firms do not take prices. OMG.
He has “no realistic idea of neo classical economics”, but teaches class in economic history and has published papers in many top 5 journals.. okay dude, if you say so lol. You just suffer from cognitive dissonance, but as a neoclassical Economist I wouldn’t expect you to know anything about individual psychology
God bless the person who uploaded this course!! You have my gratitude!! 😊👌
heyy
Thanks for posting. RUclips and AI are educating me.
40:58 He is talking about Comrade Narendra Dabholkar, a medicial doctor by profession who fought against superstition all his life.
I am watching this on 2x speed because I am the smartest person in the world and I am drunk
lol thanks for the tip
Agreed
Drunk?
thank you for this sharing; it's highly important!! wish that you'll do it more and more
DAAAAAAAAM that Kalecki roast tho
Smith, Ricardo and Marx were political economists and moral philosophers. It is sad that Henry George is absent from this group, considering that George made huge contributions in correcting the errors of logic and observations made by his predecessors and contemporaries. George would have done the same with Marx had Marx's works been available in English at the time. George's book "The Science of Political Economy" is a book that should be added to the works studied for such a course.
Thanks
What books were quoted?
31:45
Can anyone tell me professor's name
Anwar Shaikh
Emi swami,antha foreign english ey naa, can't talk u talk in telugu
This class is taught in NY city and the professor is a Pakistani US citizen. Who is the Telugu guy you are referring to?
No, no. He has no realistic idea of neoclassical economics. Tell me, what is the heterodox theory of monopoly? He is typical of current anti ..... nonsense. He doesn’t like something and tries to undermine it by he thinks technical arguments. This is rather weak. He should concentrate on reality and thereby pro capitalistic policies. He’s a typical confusing and confused critique.We all know that firms do not take prices. OMG.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly_Capital
He has “no realistic idea of neo classical economics”, but teaches class in economic history and has published papers in many top 5 journals.. okay dude, if you say so lol. You just suffer from cognitive dissonance, but as a neoclassical Economist I wouldn’t expect you to know anything about individual psychology
The only thing one needs to know about neoclassical economics is that it's fraudulent bollocks that is best ignored.
NO, NO, .... NO: denialism???
Lmao idealogue cope harder