Chanel won the fans and that’s how we know she’s the Queen ! Eurovision is over but you know other artists who slay comments so I can react to them as well 🤘🏽 ruclips.net/p/PLcqoynf5WAhVKyu8Cp1WCs_PC1gY-3Arc
I still can’t understand why she didn’t win, I voted for her ❤️ I’m so addicted to this song and performance, and it’s on repeat on Spotify 😍🔥 She’s such a good singer and dancer, she was on fire 🔥🔥 I absolutely love her, and no I’m not gay ( not that it’s anything wrong with that ❤️) Love from Norway 🇳🇴🇪🇸❤️
Sam didn't dominate televotes though, or do you think European juries that mostly consist of boomers are avid TikTok users who propped Sam up just because they stan him already?
@@NoClueHonestly Sam Ryder has 12 million followers on Tik-Tok. For Chanel this was her first single. I think that, if only for statistics, Sam Ryder started with a clear advantage. Ignoring this data and removing it from the voting results is unrealistic. Despite that the difference in points was less than a dozen.
@@ializarg los 12m los tiene ahora, no de antes. La mayor parte de fans estan en su pais y no le pueden votar (el mas afin, irlanda, nos dio 12p a nosotros). Y aun así pongamos que tenia 9M de seguidores, eso no es nada en comparación con toda europa y mas si contamos solos los que estan fuera de UK y que quien gano el televoto fueron ucrania, moldavia y españa
@@16purpura ¿Y hace una semana cuántos tenía? ¿500 o 600? Y claro, todos británicos. Que como Tik-Tok sólo lo usan los ingleses y en el resto del mundo no se entiende a los cantantes británicos... Que no, que no cuela.
Chanel is a complete artist!!! Spain performance had the highest quality of music, choreography, interpretation over all💐 They offered us a great show!⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ BTW I loved Italy , Rumania and UK But Chanel was much better!!
El año que viene si hay algún pais en guerra u otro que le haya pasado un terremoto o incendio pues mejor le damos el premio directamente y pasamos de montar el festival por respeto a los artistas.
Jajajajajajajjajajajja in love con tu comentario, todos los años ha sido así, intereses políticos por encima de la música solo que este año nos duele más porque nos afecta
Entiendo tu reacción ,supongo q a consecuencia d la guerra d Ucrania ganó ..con todos mis respetos ,los votos q consiguió Ucrania se hubieran divido entre uk y España,posiblemente España hubiera ganado ....política siempre ,bravo Chanel y su equipo mastreclass,otro nivel sin d un duda.
Los votos del público que fueron a ucrania se habrían dividido entre muchísimos más países, seguramente francia no habría quedado tan abajo y clarísimamente moldavia habría ganado el televoto. Decir que esos 439 puntos simplemente habrían ido a españa y uk es ser simplista y engañarse. La cuestión es que fueron a ucrania y no hay que darle más vueltas.
Una actuación de 10. La mejor, sin duda. Ella canta, baila y además es actriz. Tiene mucho mérito cantar y bailar a la vez. Muy merecido 👌🏻 Gracias por tu acertada reacción.
I have this song on repeat 🙌🏽🔥🙌🏽 she had everything but I guess cause of the war it was given to Ukraine at the end of the day she won shes the Queen of Eurovision. Peacock is streaming the whole finale show. Thanks for the video Reaction
UK singer has 3.5 million followers on tik tok. Also jurries wanted UK to win because they didn't want Ukraine to win which will not be able to host it. EBU accused six countries of irregularities and gave their top points to Ukraine. If that hasn't happened Spain would be second. So Ukraine won from sympathy war votes not for her song. This was best Spanish result in 27 years. She got more points than Spanish singers last ten years
Actually, Ukraine would still have won.even without the irregularities. The big difference was on the points the juries gave to UK (who had less popular vote than Spain).
@@Rechtauch it's all fixed, rigged... can't trust this big institutions, thy manipulate everything . If they can manipulate an election they certainly can manipulate a song content
Apart from the vote tampering that everybody’s mentioned, Spain didn’t win because of the war. The public gave Ukraine 400+ points to show moral support, and if those votes had been only on the performances, chances are that Chanel would have surpassed the UK. The public gave us many more votes and in the end Spain and the UK only had 7 of difference. Either way, Chanel is our winner no matter what 💙
Ukraine won because is in war, and, unfortunately, Eurovision has become more political than ever. UK contestant is a famous tiktoker with +12 million followers. If we think about it, Spain brought a girl who was not famous at all (not even in Spain, this is her debut as a singer), but she still managed to get to the 3d position, only 7 points away from UK. The quality of SloMo performance competed against a 12 million followers celebrity! This proves that this was the most interesting performance of all night. If Ukraine was not in war, it would not be in the TOP 5. In addition, there are news about Eurovision organization changing votes from 6 countries to give them to Ukraine (they are being investigated right now). I have no doubts that those stolen points from 6 countries were originally for Chanel. Spain is the only winner this year and everybody knows it.
@@NoClueHonestly I'm not saying that. But I'm sure that, without Ukraine, more votes from people would have been for Spain. I think people who voted UK was very sure about their votes, but maybe people was not that sure about voting Spain or Ukraine. I really believe that without Ukraine's situation, Spain would have made it to the top 1. That's my opinion.
@@lucasegea1385 and its probably true, sadly. Spain had the best performance but both UK and Ukraine had better songs and it's supposed to be a song contest.
@@leonorromerooliver4930 no roza, se explaya en ella. Y creo que nadie habria hablado de como Chanel enseña más o menos culo (cuando iban enseñando los tíos de otros países incluso más) , si la letra no hablara de lo que habla.
Comparing to the last 27 years, Chanel got the highest position, the most 12 points given from the Eurovision Jury ( 8 countries in total) and the most points from the fans given to Spain. Only less than 10 points below The UK on the total ranking. If Ukraine wasn’t at war, the public vote would’ve been divided into other countries which would’ve given Spain a definite win. Spain should’ve won. She did a hell of an amazing performance and to the eyes of many, she was the clear winner. Shame politics is part of the voting criteria.
The eurovision winners often win because of the televoting and this year everyone was with Ukraine so they got the majority of the televotes so if they didn't compete, Chanel wouldve probably won the contest
Un país en el que hay regiones de su mismo país que no la quieren no puede ganar.a los nacionalistas empedernidos no les interesaba que ganase españa.asi que imaginaros a quien votaron
He did not close the gala because there is a draw where they take out a role to act in the first or second half and he took out the first half and acted in the final part of the first part. Ukraine won because of the televote that voted for them in support of the war. And we are 7 points from the second. We are sure that Ukraine's points would have been spread out in other circumstances and would have benefited Spain.
Each person could vote 20 times. Whoever wanted to vote for Spain did, even if they also voted for Ukraine. Ukraine won because people wanted them to win. The real issue is with juries giving more points to a country (UK) that was further below on people's preferences.
I voted for both UK and Spain. Chanel was my #1, wasn't really going to vote for the UK, but that guy's voice is phenomenal and it blew me away so my vote was spontaneous. Also, he was #22 and she was in the first part (#10 if I am not mistaken)
I though was empty, too much replicating Bowie & Elton, the UK classics. and the staging... not much effort. but better than last year for sure. Am in the UK people are starting to believe that europeans don't hate them, it's just that the song matters. :)
Chanel is like THE QUEEN but sadly, here in Spain some people doesn't appreciate what she did and she gets hate by people... I love how she dances, sings, she's amazing and i don't understand why she gets hate :(
This is false, the composer of the song has explained what happened: what they wanted to mean is that the feeling of the show they want to achive was something of the style of JL at Superbowl, etc. But the traductor of one of the nordic countries misundersrtood it and now this fake story has spread (with even the comentarists of other countries taking it for real)
How is it possible that some countries didn't even give any points to Spain? It read somewhere that this had to do with the nudity in the performance. Welcome to 2022.
Lamentablemente, España lo tiene MUY difícil para ganar este concurso. CHANEL era ,de lejos, la mejor y no a podido. Los países del Este se votan entre ellos y los que están cerca de España, a veces, ni eso, por no decir que el idioma era una barrera que España a intentado introducir (ingles),en parte de su letra, pues ni así. España no es muy bien mirada en Europa, lo digo con pena pero es así y mejor no meternos en política europea. Pero es igual CHANEL superaba con creces al cantante inglés y Ucrania ganó por pena. EUROVISIÓN es una sucursal de la OTAN o de la ONU ? sólo pregunto 🤔
Es que España 🇪🇸 tiene a su alrededor vecinos envidiosos que no han olvidado que España puso frente a Europa y el mundo un continente desconocido hasta ese entonces. Nunca le van a perdonar haber protagonizado ese evento histórico. Italia 🇮🇹 Francia 🇫🇷 par de Repúblicas envidiosas la madre patria es la más bella. 🤪
@@vjmorenom igual sí, pero yo creo que saliendo del big 5 pagaríamos menos, nos tendrían menos rabia y solo llegaríamos a la final si no mandáramos cualquier mierda como algunos años.
@@judiit09 Yo creo que lo del big 5 lo hacen para asegurarse una buena audiencia en la final, en ese big 5 estamos nosotros, Francia, Italia, Alemania y Reino Unido, entre todos sumamos una poblacion en torno a los 320 millones de personas.
The UK's advantage over Spain comes almost directly from the 6 countries whose votes were "modified" (aka stolen) by Eurovision. I imagine the UK was seen as being at flight-risk by Eurovision following its awful performance last year and the intervening rumors that the result was yet another sign that the rest of Europe isn't necessarily happy with the UK following brexit. Losing the UK would result in a considerable financial loss for the contest, so the contest organizers decided to intervene on its behalf. The only other explanation is that much like Ukraine's victory comes from a desire from the organizers to show the world a united Europe, the UK's 2nd place was also orchestrated to project a unified Europe (the difference being that Ukraine's victory was the result of a collective vote of unity and the UK's second place was the result of the jury's tampering). To be clear neither entry (the UK's or Ukraine's) were bad entries. However, they were not 1st or 2nd place worthy entries -- especially in a year as competitive as this one.
The votes were modified because they blatantly and provably cheated in the semifinal by vote-swapping but way to play the victim lmfao. I swear some people will buy into any absurd conspiracy theories to justify why their fav didn't win. I love Chanel, the performance was the best of the night, but I knew it wouldn't win jury vote. It would do well for sure, but it wouldn't win because as stellar as the performance was, the song itself is kind of garbage. It's catchy and polished but the lyrics are not good, the hook is simple and musically, it's about as complex as a nursery rhyme. That's why it struggled with winning the jury vote even though the choreography, production and live vocals were on point. Sorry buddy, truth hurts.
@@NoClueHonestly I'm disagree with you. And example for you. I live in Italy, I vote for her, 5 points, my husband 5 points, my 6 friends 5 points each one that make a totally of 45 points. And I'm sure that many latin people here in Italy vote for her. So, why Italy don't give points, where are all this points. You can't see the votes from Italy. Zero points from the public. I feel robbed. The letter of the song is simple and catchy yes, is a festival not an opera. Aquile Lauro sang I wanna be a stripper so.... she deserves winning. I hope she can get a great carrier, who knows? Maybe will see in the Grammy.
@@miroroguez8363 And I and everyone I know spent most of our votes on Australia but he didn't get any televotes from my country. You don't see me screaming foul at it because I understand that it happens. There are around 200k Latin immigrants in Italy against a population of 60 million. That's 0.3% of the population, that's like nothing. And since Romania got a lot of points, maybe a big portion of them voted for the other song that was in Spanish instad
@@NoClueHonestly Who screaming? I get my opinion like you give us your opinion. I don't like her, I respect your feelings but I disagree with your opinion. That's is democracy. So for me it became a political festival, let's show to the world that Europe is against war. That is my opinion.
It's a bit suspicious that the first year the contest was sponsored by tiktok, it's the tiktok star the one that receives the more points from the jury..
Chanel number one over the world 🇪🇦 italy thanks for your 0 cheat points . An italian commentator saying that say should not vote for chanel in live ,how unprofessional🇮🇹👎
Desde 2016 Italia no le da ni un solo punto a España, este año ha sido el unico pais de todo el festival que no le ha dado ni un solo punto a Chanel, era logico, es el sexto año seguido que hacen lo mismo, no es un problema de la cancion, hay algo mas, odio, envidia, no se, algo hay por lo que llevamos seis años sin que nos den un solo punto.
@@jasmineperry387 el año pasado vuestra canción daba pena y ganasteis nadie daba un euro por ella, claro que ya sabemos que Eurovisión es política, Lo único que hacéis medio bien son los espaguetis.
@@jesemedinasuarez è vero che Chanel è piaciuta a molti (voi spagnoli eravate un esercito) ma nessuno può negare che abbia cantato una canzone superficiale, è come se all'Eurovision su cantasse un tormentone estivo.
@@jasmineperry387 Lo dices como si los demás países hubiesen mencionado un mensaje profundo… Kyle Hanagami, es un coreográfo profesional y ha bailado para grupos de la talla de BlackPink en Corea, JLo, entre otros. Y es él el que ha estado detrás de toda la exhibición de España. Hemos dado un buen espectáculo, que de eso se trata Eurovisión, un show, un festival… Hay que reconocer cuando se hacen bien las cosas e Italia se ha portado muy mal. Para mí, habéis sido una grandísima decepción.
There are different things you have to do in order to win Eurovision. This is not just about the great performance. There is no perfect recipe. It's whatever clicks with the audience that year, which is why Eurovision is so good. You never really know what to expect. Gays will love their female bops and will hype them up regardless, artsy people will prefer weird performances with a deeper message, yet the majority of the home audience will probably want something ethnic, something that sounds like the culture of the country they are representing. It's never a safe bet.
btw its not a fan recording lmao, this is the Official show performance, how everyone saw it, were you not confused about the different camera angles and her looking directly at it. What fan audience recording has that lol
Spain doesn't participate in the semifinals, Spain is part of the Big5, next to Germany, Uk, Italy and France. Germany once didn't classified and because the Big5 are the ones that invest the biggest amount of money, that year Eurovision was in danger, they didn't have enough money, Eurovision was close to be cancelled that year. Since then, they classify directly, and also they have less oportunities to shine on the stage. While the rest of the contestants are seen at least twice, the big 5 have to make people love them with just one opportunity in compensation for the direct classification.
What else was she suposed to do to win Eurovision? She deserved FIRST place. FACT! She already said she won’t participate it again and I think she is right. Was it good to Spain? I don’t think so. We deserved the FIRST place. ☹️
The problem with Eurovision is the political view of the contest. Adding to this,,, before the contest we held a festival in Benidorm (which Chanel won) in order to know which performer would be our representative in Eurovision. Chanel won, but there were tons of hate for her because the public thought it was some kind of scam because televoting only had a validity of 3% and others had 30%. As an example, this was our best spot in 27 years... and here in Spain, she is some kind of hero now. I wish her the best because she deserves it!
The Benidorm system was awful regardless. It's almost as bad as the Eurovision system of only 5 jurors controlling 50% of a country's total points to give out.
Lo criticado fue la canción (letra y mensaje) y la elección del jurado de la candidatura más cómoda (con una productora dispuesta a cubrir todos los gastos...) Para mí merecía ganar España este año porque la actuación (sobretodo coreografía y vestuario) destaca por encima del resto... Pero para muchos países, como Italia, lo principal es la canción y había muchas canciones mejores que Slo mo (como canción es flojilla) Aquí al principio, tampoco la tuvimos casi en cuenta, hasta ver la puesta en escena con una coreografía espectacular..
Pienso que el festival de Eurovisión ha perdido toda credibilidad y confianza por varias razones...: 1.- Por politizar... o dejar que se politice el concurso que es un festival de música y no político. 2.- Cambiar, permitir o dejar que se cambien, influyan o varíen las votaciones debido a esa politización y votos politizados. 3.- No estar dispuesto a corregir y poner las cosas, votaciones, resultados y puestos reales, auténticos y finales en su sitio correcto y justo. De haber sido y haberse dado todo como se debería haber dado, y según las votaciones reales y auténticas, ahora podríamos decir sin lugar a dudas que Chanel es o habría sido la ganadora absoluta del festival Eurovisivo de la canción y la música..., el cual ha quedado por los suelos al convertirse en un festival político que no ha respetado los votos reales y auténticos, semejante a como actúa una dictadura política que para lograr los resultados que quiere y ambiciona, y así poder perpetuarse en el poder, manipula los resultados, y corrupta por tanto. Qué pena y qué horror !!!...
Por tu punto uno creo que no esas muy al día de cual es el origen de eurovisión o lo que realmente representa. Eurovisión jamas ha sido un concurso de música sin mas, nacio por política y siempre ha tenido un papel político, se creo como algo que uniera a los países de Europa después de la segunda guerra mundial en algo no violento, lo importante de Eurovisión es la participación de todos los países en algo en armonía, quien gane o pierda no importa en absoluto, de hecho fuera de ABBA y Céline Dion prácticamente nadie ha salido de eurovisión y se le recuerda. Eurovisión es un lugar de unión y cooperación entre los países de Europa, por eso no puedes votar a tu propio país ni tan solo votas a uno, estas obligado a apoyar a varios vecinos. Así que si, eurovisión es un festival político, la música es una excusa.
@@javierpda pues mire usted, va a tener que ser que no le de la razón. Básicamente porque su punto de vista es eso, su punto de vista, pero no es exacto, ya que no se corresponde con la realidad del origen del festival y concurso, y por tanto su visión (la de usted), está un poco desvirtuada, tergiversada o torcida. Mire usted Sr. Javier..., basado en el Festival de San Remo, el primer Festival de la Canción de Eurovisión fue idea de Marcel Bezençon, expresidente de la Unión Europea de Radiodifusión. El fin último de la organización era UNIR A LOS PUEBLOS EN LA MÚSICA (ASÍ QUE NADA DE POLÍTICA), Y DAR A CONOCER AL MUNDO LA MÚSICA EUROPEA. El concurso también tenía la intención de probar los límites de la tecnología para la transmisión en vivo. Así que como ve, no es exactamente lo que usted dice, y por lo tanto, sí, me vuelvo a reiterar, se ha desvirtuado y corrompido por asuntos y temas políticos, hasta el punto de hacer y permitir que en los votos influyan aspectos políticos y/o solidarios políticamente hablando. En fin, una corruptela, ya que ES UN FESTIVAL Y CONCURSO MUSICAL y no un evento para la solidaridad nacionalista y política.
It's so funny seeing all the Spanish ppl defending Chanel now when not two months ago you were all tearing into her and mercilessly harassing her on social media because she wasn't your fav to win the national finals. NOW you care about the poor girl since she did well? Makes me sick
I did not harrase her (I had not listened to the song one week ago and I have a life, thanks). But I do think that, as much as it is a good commercial song and she gave a flawless performance, it was not a good song to represent Spain in Eurovision. Cultural appropriation at best,actually.
@@Rechtauch Spaniards literally abused her so much she left Twitter. Why is it cultural appropriation? She's part Spanish and has lived in Spain since the age of 3
@@NoClueHonestly I mean cultural appropriation from the part of Spain, to present a song that is Latin-American, I do not think it is right from us to present it as ours. No claiming that Chanel herself is less Spanish, just the song. A little like the Romanian song, that was flamenco. And there are million of Spaniards, including racist Spaniards and Internet trolls. "Spaniards" did not harrase her, some a****** did. Not the same that are now proud of her.
It is normal that Ukraine won. Of course people wanted to support them and the song did not stink. Between UK and Spain, the UK was favoured by the juries. The Spanish song got more votes from the public. That said, como española tampoco me entusiasma Chanel. A ver, que lo hizo muy bien y que le deseo todo El éxito del mundo, pero que mandar regetton en Spanglish a Eurovision...
Que tienes que hacer para ganar eurovision? Pues entrar en guerra contra un país muy superior a ti y comenzar una campaña de dar pena como hicieron los ucranianos desde el inicio del festival. Una vergüenza para eurovision y triste para un país que gana dando lastima por encima de la calidad de su artista.
Menos países bajos todas las canciones últimamente han ganado por pena. Ucrania 2 veces, Salvador Sobral diciendo que iba a ser ingresado por su corazón y le quedaba poco tiempo, Netta ya sabemos la letra de la canción... En fin
I think that the Eurovision Song Contest has lost all credibility and trust for several reasons...: 1.- For politicizing... or letting the contest become politicized, which is a music festival and not a political one. 2.- Change, allow or allow voting to be changed, influenced or varied due to this politicization and politicized votes. 3.- Not being willing to correct and put things, votes, results and real, authentic and final positions in their correct and fair place. If everything had been and had been given as it should have been, and according to the real and authentic votes, we could now say without a doubt that Chanel is or would have been the absolute winner of the Eurovision song and music festival..., which has been ruined by becoming a political festival that has not respected real and authentic votes, similar to how a political dictatorship acts that, in order to achieve the results it wants and aspires to, and thus be able to perpetuate itself in power, manipulates the results. And therefore, we can say that he has acted corruptly. What a pity and what horror !!!...
Chanel won the fans and that’s how we know she’s the Queen ! Eurovision is over but you know other artists who slay comments so I can react to them as well 🤘🏽 ruclips.net/p/PLcqoynf5WAhVKyu8Cp1WCs_PC1gY-3Arc
Spain did not win because it is Spain. And it seems that the pity had to win this year.
que humildad chanel que iinvito a 29 artistas a actuar en su concierto
i've never really bought a eurovision song but i legit bought this THE MOMENT I COULD. she was so skilled and talented and amazing!!
I still can’t understand why she didn’t win, I voted for her ❤️
I’m so addicted to this song and performance, and it’s on repeat on Spotify 😍🔥
She’s such a good singer and dancer, she was on fire 🔥🔥
I absolutely love her, and no I’m not gay ( not that it’s anything wrong with that ❤️)
Love from Norway 🇳🇴🇪🇸❤️
Política...
@@rosalianunez1535 I know, it’s sad though
💙
❤️❤️❤️❤️🇪🇦💋💋💋🇪🇦🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🇪🇦🇸🇯🇸🇯
Because a song about sex will never beat a wonderfully made and sung about the love towards Moms.
The best summary I have read of the results of this year Eurovision Song Contest was this:
1. The War
2. TikTok
3. Chanel
Sam didn't dominate televotes though, or do you think European juries that mostly consist of boomers are avid TikTok users who propped Sam up just because they stan him already?
@@NoClueHonestly Sam Ryder has 12 million followers on Tik-Tok.
For Chanel this was her first single.
I think that, if only for statistics, Sam Ryder started with a clear advantage.
Ignoring this data and removing it from the voting results is unrealistic.
Despite that the difference in points was less than a dozen.
@@ializarg los 12m los tiene ahora, no de antes. La mayor parte de fans estan en su pais y no le pueden votar (el mas afin, irlanda, nos dio 12p a nosotros). Y aun así pongamos que tenia 9M de seguidores, eso no es nada en comparación con toda europa y mas si contamos solos los que estan fuera de UK y que quien gano el televoto fueron ucrania, moldavia y españa
@@16purpura ¿Y hace una semana cuántos tenía?
¿500 o 600?
Y claro, todos británicos.
Que como Tik-Tok sólo lo usan los ingleses y en el resto del mundo no se entiende a los cantantes británicos...
Que no, que no cuela.
Nooooo 🤣🤣🤣🤣(risa amarga). Pero coño, es quien lo haya escrito, lo ha clavado. 🧛🏻♀️🖤
This was the real winner and everybody knows it! Chanel is a super star!
Chanel is a complete artist!!! Spain performance had the highest quality of music, choreography, interpretation over all💐 They offered us a great show!⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
BTW I loved Italy , Rumania and UK
But Chanel was much better!!
It is all politics, Spain number 1
She didnt got fiest place but she is the winner, her song and performance is the one everybody is going to remember.
this song is for one summer
Estoy de acuerdo
El año que viene si hay algún pais en guerra u otro que le haya pasado un terremoto o incendio pues mejor le damos el premio directamente y pasamos de montar el festival por respeto a los artistas.
Jajajajajajajjajajajja in love con tu comentario, todos los años ha sido así, intereses políticos por encima de la música solo que este año nos duele más porque nos afecta
Entiendo tu reacción ,supongo q a consecuencia d la guerra d Ucrania ganó ..con todos mis respetos ,los votos q consiguió Ucrania se hubieran divido entre uk y España,posiblemente España hubiera ganado ....política siempre ,bravo Chanel y su equipo mastreclass,otro nivel sin d un duda.
Los votos del público que fueron a ucrania se habrían dividido entre muchísimos más países, seguramente francia no habría quedado tan abajo y clarísimamente moldavia habría ganado el televoto. Decir que esos 439 puntos simplemente habrían ido a españa y uk es ser simplista y engañarse. La cuestión es que fueron a ucrania y no hay que darle más vueltas.
Moldova received more votes than Spain
Hahaha letteralmente tutte le altre canzoni meritavano molto di più rispetto alla Spagna
Una actuación de 10. La mejor, sin duda. Ella canta, baila y además es actriz. Tiene mucho mérito cantar y bailar a la vez. Muy merecido 👌🏻 Gracias por tu acertada reacción.
@@jasmineperry387 porque tú lo digas… xD
Bravo Chanel !!!! sin duda lo mejor de eurovision con diferencia 👍👍
I have this song on repeat 🙌🏽🔥🙌🏽 she had everything but I guess cause of the war it was given to Ukraine at the end of the day she won shes the Queen of Eurovision. Peacock is streaming the whole finale show. Thanks for the video Reaction
Lol, you forgeting that UK was second, not spain, and sweden was more deserving of third place than spain.
@@deimantev8641 Ukraine's votes would have been given to other countries and Spain would have gotten more points than UK
Ese performance no se puede repetir, y en otras circunstancias hubiéramos ganado. Que injusto...
UK singer has 3.5 million followers on tik tok. Also jurries wanted UK to win because they didn't want Ukraine to win which will not be able to host it. EBU accused six countries of irregularities and gave their top points to Ukraine. If that hasn't happened Spain would be second. So Ukraine won from sympathy war votes not for her song. This was best Spanish result in 27 years. She got more points than Spanish singers last ten years
20M*
Actually, Ukraine would still have won.even without the irregularities. The big difference was on the points the juries gave to UK (who had less popular vote than Spain).
@@Rechtauch it's all fixed, rigged... can't trust this big institutions, thy manipulate everything . If they can manipulate an election they certainly can manipulate a song content
@@AS-ld5mz just to be clear, we are really not on the same line. Juries are just our of touch with public's tastes.
Apart from the vote tampering that everybody’s mentioned, Spain didn’t win because of the war. The public gave Ukraine 400+ points to show moral support, and if those votes had been only on the performances, chances are that Chanel would have surpassed the UK. The public gave us many more votes and in the end Spain and the UK only had 7 of difference. Either way, Chanel is our winner no matter what 💙
I doubt Chanel will make a comeback tbh, but she made us all proud of her performance
Ukraine won because is in war, and, unfortunately, Eurovision has become more political than ever. UK contestant is a famous tiktoker with +12 million followers. If we think about it, Spain brought a girl who was not famous at all (not even in Spain, this is her debut as a singer), but she still managed to get to the 3d position, only 7 points away from UK. The quality of SloMo performance competed against a 12 million followers celebrity! This proves that this was the most interesting performance of all night. If Ukraine was not in war, it would not be in the TOP 5. In addition, there are news about Eurovision organization changing votes from 6 countries to give them to Ukraine (they are being investigated right now). I have no doubts that those stolen points from 6 countries were originally for Chanel. Spain is the only winner this year and everybody knows it.
But UK was carried by juries, not televote. Or do you think the boomers sitting in the jury gave Sam points because they follow him on TikTok? Lmao
@@NoClueHonestly The "problematic" votes were from 6 country-Juries, not from the televoting.
@@NoClueHonestly I'm not saying that. But I'm sure that, without Ukraine, more votes from people would have been for Spain. I think people who voted UK was very sure about their votes, but maybe people was not that sure about voting Spain or Ukraine. I really believe that without Ukraine's situation, Spain would have made it to the top 1. That's my opinion.
Those 6 countries only voted for each other fyi, NOT spain. They cheated and if you look at the way they voted its obvious they cheated.
@@lucasegea1385 and its probably true, sadly. Spain had the best performance but both UK and Ukraine had better songs and it's supposed to be a song contest.
Da igual España GANADORA 🥇
Love Chanel
So proud of her! ❤️❤️❤️
A new star was born . 😍🇪🇸🇨🇺
Gran representación de mi pais, Chanel es una superestrella
Tienes toda la razón. Ha sido un auténtico despropósito que España no ganara el Festival de Eurovisión 2022
Llego la mami, la dura, la bugati🎶🎶🎶
Sólo existe una, no hay imitaciones, pa'romper caderas, romper corazones 🎶🎶😂😂
La mejor una diosa 😍
Lo malo es leer la letra, porque en el escenario no se entinde y mejor así. Es muy vulgar y roza la vulgaridad y la prostitución
@@leonorromerooliver4930 no roza, se explaya en ella. Y creo que nadie habria hablado de como Chanel enseña más o menos culo (cuando iban enseñando los tíos de otros países incluso más) , si la letra no hablara de lo que habla.
Tenía que haber ganado Eurovisión es cantante de musicales ,el gualda espalda el rey león un abrazo fuerte desde Tenerife
Looks like the superbowl performance!!
My winner 🥇 forever
U r the best..gracias from ESPAÑA
Aww love you !!
Spain with Chanel is the really winner!
Chanel and all the performers AMAZING! 😍❤️👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Comparing to the last 27 years, Chanel got the highest position, the most 12 points given from the Eurovision Jury ( 8 countries in total) and the most points from the fans given to Spain. Only less than 10 points below The UK on the total ranking. If Ukraine wasn’t at war, the public vote would’ve been divided into other countries which would’ve given Spain a definite win. Spain should’ve won. She did a hell of an amazing performance and to the eyes of many, she was the clear winner. Shame politics is part of the voting criteria.
The eurovision winners often win because of the televoting and this year everyone was with Ukraine so they got the majority of the televotes so if they didn't compete, Chanel wouldve probably won the contest
Un país en el que hay regiones de su mismo país que no la quieren no puede ganar.a los nacionalistas empedernidos no les interesaba que ganase españa.asi que imaginaros a quien votaron
He did not close the gala because there is a draw where they take out a role to act in the first or second half and he took out the first half and acted in the final part of the first part. Ukraine won because of the televote that voted for them in support of the war. And we are 7 points from the second. We are sure that Ukraine's points would have been spread out in other circumstances and would have benefited Spain.
Each person could vote 20 times. Whoever wanted to vote for Spain did, even if they also voted for Ukraine. Ukraine won because people wanted them to win. The real issue is with juries giving more points to a country (UK) that was further below on people's preferences.
I voted for both UK and Spain. Chanel was my #1, wasn't really going to vote for the UK, but that guy's voice is phenomenal and it blew me away so my vote was spontaneous.
Also, he was #22 and she was in the first part (#10 if I am not mistaken)
I though was empty, too much replicating Bowie & Elton, the UK classics. and the staging... not much effort. but better than last year for sure. Am in the UK people are starting to believe that europeans don't hate them, it's just that the song matters. :)
Chanel is like THE QUEEN but sadly, here in Spain some people doesn't appreciate what she did and she gets hate by people...
I love how she dances, sings, she's amazing and i don't understand why she gets hate :(
Impresionante. Es imperdonable qué un concurso sea tan politizado.
With the real votes Spain was actually second (which is the same as winning because no one could top ukraine this year…)
thank you for the intro
Real Winner
the song was written for Jennifer Lopez, but apparently she rejected it!!!!!!!! Chanel made it her own......best of all she made it espaniol!!!!!
This is false, the composer of the song has explained what happened: what they wanted to mean is that the feeling of the show they want to achive was something of the style of JL at Superbowl, etc. But the traductor of one of the nordic countries misundersrtood it and now this fake story has spread (with even the comentarists of other countries taking it for real)
WoW!
How is it possible that some countries didn't even give any points to Spain? It read somewhere that this had to do with the nudity in the performance. Welcome to 2022.
This video isn't grand final. In the Grand Final her jacket (torera in spanish) is open before dance break. Chanel is a diva. She is our winner. 💃😍🌊
Lamentablemente, España lo tiene MUY difícil para ganar este concurso.
CHANEL era ,de lejos, la mejor y no a podido.
Los países del Este se votan entre ellos y los que están cerca de España, a veces, ni eso, por no decir que el idioma era una barrera que España a intentado introducir (ingles),en parte de su letra, pues ni así.
España no es muy bien mirada en Europa, lo digo con pena pero es así y mejor no meternos en política europea.
Pero es igual CHANEL superaba con creces al cantante inglés y Ucrania ganó por pena.
EUROVISIÓN es una sucursal de la OTAN o de la ONU ? sólo pregunto 🤔
Deberíamos dejar de estar en los Big 5 e ir a semis como los demás.
Unos se votan entre ellos, y otros, como Italia, no nos vota nunca.
Es que España 🇪🇸 tiene a su alrededor vecinos envidiosos que no han olvidado que España puso frente a Europa y el mundo un continente desconocido hasta ese entonces. Nunca le van a perdonar haber protagonizado ese evento histórico. Italia 🇮🇹 Francia 🇫🇷 par de Repúblicas envidiosas la madre patria es la más bella. 🤪
@@vjmorenom igual sí, pero yo creo que saliendo del big 5 pagaríamos menos, nos tendrían menos rabia y solo llegaríamos a la final si no mandáramos cualquier mierda como algunos años.
@@judiit09 Yo creo que lo del big 5 lo hacen para asegurarse una buena audiencia en la final, en ese big 5 estamos nosotros, Francia, Italia, Alemania y Reino Unido, entre todos sumamos una poblacion en torno a los 320 millones de personas.
#teamChanel 🇪🇸🇨🇺
The UK's advantage over Spain comes almost directly from the 6 countries whose votes were "modified" (aka stolen) by Eurovision. I imagine the UK was seen as being at flight-risk by Eurovision following its awful performance last year and the intervening rumors that the result was yet another sign that the rest of Europe isn't necessarily happy with the UK following brexit. Losing the UK would result in a considerable financial loss for the contest, so the contest organizers decided to intervene on its behalf. The only other explanation is that much like Ukraine's victory comes from a desire from the organizers to show the world a united Europe, the UK's 2nd place was also orchestrated to project a unified Europe (the difference being that Ukraine's victory was the result of a collective vote of unity and the UK's second place was the result of the jury's tampering). To be clear neither entry (the UK's or Ukraine's) were bad entries. However, they were not 1st or 2nd place worthy entries -- especially in a year as competitive as this one.
The votes were modified because they blatantly and provably cheated in the semifinal by vote-swapping but way to play the victim lmfao. I swear some people will buy into any absurd conspiracy theories to justify why their fav didn't win. I love Chanel, the performance was the best of the night, but I knew it wouldn't win jury vote. It would do well for sure, but it wouldn't win because as stellar as the performance was, the song itself is kind of garbage. It's catchy and polished but the lyrics are not good, the hook is simple and musically, it's about as complex as a nursery rhyme. That's why it struggled with winning the jury vote even though the choreography, production and live vocals were on point.
Sorry buddy, truth hurts.
@@NoClueHonestly I'm disagree with you. And example for you. I live in Italy, I vote for her, 5 points, my husband 5 points, my 6 friends 5 points each one that make a totally of 45 points. And I'm sure that many latin people here in Italy vote for her. So, why Italy don't give points, where are all this points. You can't see the votes from Italy. Zero points from the public. I feel robbed. The letter of the song is simple and catchy yes, is a festival not an opera. Aquile Lauro sang I wanna be a stripper so.... she deserves winning. I hope she can get a great carrier, who knows? Maybe will see in the Grammy.
@@miroroguez8363 And I and everyone I know spent most of our votes on Australia but he didn't get any televotes from my country. You don't see me screaming foul at it because I understand that it happens. There are around 200k Latin immigrants in Italy against a population of 60 million. That's 0.3% of the population, that's like nothing. And since Romania got a lot of points, maybe a big portion of them voted for the other song that was in Spanish instad
@@NoClueHonestly Who screaming? I get my opinion like you give us your opinion. I don't like her, I respect your feelings but I disagree with your opinion. That's is democracy. So for me it became a political festival, let's show to the world that Europe is against war. That is my opinion.
It's a bit suspicious that the first year the contest was sponsored by tiktok, it's the tiktok star the one that receives the more points from the jury..
Congratulazione nessuna ragione Italia
Chanel number one over the world 🇪🇦 italy thanks for your 0 cheat points . An italian commentator saying that say should not vote for chanel in live ,how unprofessional🇮🇹👎
Desde 2016 Italia no le da ni un solo punto a España, este año ha sido el unico pais de todo el festival que no le ha dado ni un solo punto a Chanel, era logico, es el sexto año seguido que hacen lo mismo, no es un problema de la cancion, hay algo mas, odio, envidia, no se, algo hay por lo que llevamos seis años sin que nos den un solo punto.
L'anno scorso la Spagna era noiosa e stereotipata, quest'anno ha portato una canzone superficiale adatta solo alle discoteche.
Un italiano hablando de superficialidad? Jajajajaja Que os conocemos.
@@jasmineperry387 el año pasado vuestra canción daba pena y ganasteis nadie daba un euro por ella, claro que ya sabemos que Eurovisión es política, Lo único que hacéis medio bien son los espaguetis.
@@jesemedinasuarez è vero che Chanel è piaciuta a molti (voi spagnoli eravate un esercito) ma nessuno può negare che abbia cantato una canzone superficiale, è come se all'Eurovision su cantasse un tormentone estivo.
@@jasmineperry387
Lo dices como si los demás países hubiesen mencionado un mensaje profundo…
Kyle Hanagami, es un coreográfo profesional y ha bailado para grupos de la talla de BlackPink en Corea, JLo, entre otros. Y es él el que ha estado detrás de toda la exhibición de España. Hemos dado un buen espectáculo, que de eso se trata Eurovisión, un show, un festival…
Hay que reconocer cuando se hacen bien las cosas e Italia se ha portado muy mal. Para mí, habéis sido una grandísima decepción.
its giving Beyonce and Camila Cabelo vibes
Ukraine also fan of Chanel so many other countries...✌️✌️✌️🙏🙏🙏
There are different things you have to do in order to win Eurovision. This is not just about the great performance. There is no perfect recipe. It's whatever clicks with the audience that year, which is why Eurovision is so good. You never really know what to expect. Gays will love their female bops and will hype them up regardless, artsy people will prefer weird performances with a deeper message, yet the majority of the home audience will probably want something ethnic, something that sounds like the culture of the country they are representing. It's never a safe bet.
btw its not a fan recording lmao, this is the Official show performance, how everyone saw it,
were you not confused about the different camera angles and her looking directly at it. What fan audience recording has that lol
It was a fan recording of the official video. They recorded it off their own screen.
That's. not the Grand Final performance. That is the performance that was aired in the semi-final 2.
Spain doesn't participate in the semifinals, Spain is part of the Big5, next to Germany, Uk, Italy and France. Germany once didn't classified and because the Big5 are the ones that invest the biggest amount of money, that year Eurovision was in danger, they didn't have enough money, Eurovision was close to be cancelled that year. Since then, they classify directly, and also they have less oportunities to shine on the stage. While the rest of the contestants are seen at least twice, the big 5 have to make people love them with just one opportunity in compensation for the direct classification.
Politics man, just politics… I don’t know why we still bother sending songs to eurovision. Great reaction btw, saludos!
What else was she suposed to do to win Eurovision? She deserved FIRST place. FACT!
She already said she won’t participate it again and I think she is right.
Was it good to Spain? I don’t think so. We deserved the FIRST place. ☹️
🔥💙🇪🇸
Nice weekend
politics, Chanel is a goddess
The problem with Eurovision is the political view of the contest. Adding to this,,, before the contest we held a festival in Benidorm (which Chanel won) in order to know which performer would be our representative in Eurovision. Chanel won, but there were tons of hate for her because the public thought it was some kind of scam because televoting only had a validity of 3% and others had 30%. As an example, this was our best spot in 27 years... and here in Spain, she is some kind of hero now. I wish her the best because she deserves it!
The Benidorm system was awful regardless. It's almost as bad as the Eurovision system of only 5 jurors controlling 50% of a country's total points to give out.
You can use a VPN to watch the videos en the US
True , I never did that before but I want to see many of the finals 😮
Hadise düm tek tek 2009 Eurovision grand final performance reaction pls ❣️ ı love you from turkey
For me she is the winner
CHANEL is the new J. LO
spain has a norm about sending people who aren't famous in the music world.
Chanel winner 2022 2023 y 2026
👍👍👍
From a spanish viewer i did also believe this was our year but no... unfortunately political decitions is what it is...
Why didn't Chanel win?
a)The war in Ukraine
b)The juries in each country go for more old - fashioned options, so they kind of ignored her.
Chanel👇
That’s not the grand final performance. That’s the performance of the day before the final.
It’s not available in USA anyways so it’s gonna be hard for me to watch .
Lo que es más raro aún es que cuando ganó el concurso nacional fue muy criticada en España .
Lo criticado fue la canción (letra y mensaje) y la elección del jurado de la candidatura más cómoda (con una productora dispuesta a cubrir todos los gastos...)
Para mí merecía ganar España este año porque la actuación (sobretodo coreografía y vestuario) destaca por encima del resto... Pero para muchos países, como Italia, lo principal es la canción y había muchas canciones mejores que Slo mo (como canción es flojilla) Aquí al principio, tampoco la tuvimos casi en cuenta, hasta ver la puesta en escena con una coreografía espectacular..
Winer...so far
Politics , the result was decided before it started.
She didn't win because of politics. It's not about the best song or performance. , the votes are between countries, friendship and politics.
Please react to the Albania at first semifinal plssssss
Estoy seguro de que muchos españoles de los que odian a España votaron a los que se sabían rivales.asi es imposible ganar
0:42 65% politics 35% overall performance
!
Eurovision is always about politics, that's why UK had more points than Spain, and honestly, that's why Ukraine won. Chanel was the best!
Cada ano en Eurovision hay un drama
It's luck, popularity and how they handle themselves at the event.
This wasn’t the grand final performance.
Pienso que el festival de Eurovisión ha perdido toda credibilidad y confianza por varias razones...:
1.- Por politizar... o dejar que se politice el concurso que es un festival de música y no político.
2.- Cambiar, permitir o dejar que se cambien, influyan o varíen las votaciones debido a esa politización y votos politizados.
3.- No estar dispuesto a corregir y poner las cosas, votaciones, resultados y puestos reales, auténticos y finales en su sitio correcto y justo.
De haber sido y haberse dado todo como se debería haber dado, y según las votaciones reales y auténticas, ahora podríamos decir sin lugar a dudas que Chanel es o habría sido la ganadora absoluta del festival Eurovisivo de la canción y la música..., el cual ha quedado por los suelos al convertirse en un festival político que no ha respetado los votos reales y auténticos, semejante a como actúa una dictadura política que para lograr los resultados que quiere y ambiciona, y así poder perpetuarse en el poder, manipula los resultados, y corrupta por tanto. Qué pena y qué horror !!!...
Por tu punto uno creo que no esas muy al día de cual es el origen de eurovisión o lo que realmente representa. Eurovisión jamas ha sido un concurso de música sin mas, nacio por política y siempre ha tenido un papel político, se creo como algo que uniera a los países de Europa después de la segunda guerra mundial en algo no violento, lo importante de Eurovisión es la participación de todos los países en algo en armonía, quien gane o pierda no importa en absoluto, de hecho fuera de ABBA y Céline Dion prácticamente nadie ha salido de eurovisión y se le recuerda. Eurovisión es un lugar de unión y cooperación entre los países de Europa, por eso no puedes votar a tu propio país ni tan solo votas a uno, estas obligado a apoyar a varios vecinos. Así que si, eurovisión es un festival político, la música es una excusa.
@@javierpda pues mire usted, va a tener que ser que no le de la razón. Básicamente porque su punto de vista es eso, su punto de vista, pero no es exacto, ya que no se corresponde con la realidad del origen del festival y concurso, y por tanto su visión (la de usted), está un poco desvirtuada, tergiversada o torcida. Mire usted Sr. Javier..., basado en el Festival de San Remo, el primer Festival de la Canción de Eurovisión fue idea de Marcel Bezençon, expresidente de la Unión Europea de Radiodifusión. El fin último de la organización era UNIR A LOS PUEBLOS EN LA MÚSICA (ASÍ QUE NADA DE POLÍTICA), Y DAR A CONOCER AL MUNDO LA MÚSICA EUROPEA. El concurso también tenía la intención de probar los límites de la tecnología para la transmisión en vivo.
Así que como ve, no es exactamente lo que usted dice, y por lo tanto, sí, me vuelvo a reiterar, se ha desvirtuado y corrompido por asuntos y temas políticos, hasta el punto de hacer y permitir que en los votos influyan aspectos políticos y/o solidarios políticamente hablando. En fin, una corruptela, ya que ES UN FESTIVAL Y CONCURSO MUSICAL y no un evento para la solidaridad nacionalista y política.
It's so funny seeing all the Spanish ppl defending Chanel now when not two months ago you were all tearing into her and mercilessly harassing her on social media because she wasn't your fav to win the national finals. NOW you care about the poor girl since she did well? Makes me sick
I did not harrase her (I had not listened to the song one week ago and I have a life, thanks). But I do think that, as much as it is a good commercial song and she gave a flawless performance, it was not a good song to represent Spain in Eurovision. Cultural appropriation at best,actually.
@@Rechtauch Spaniards literally abused her so much she left Twitter. Why is it cultural appropriation? She's part Spanish and has lived in Spain since the age of 3
@@NoClueHonestly I mean cultural appropriation from the part of Spain, to present a song that is Latin-American, I do not think it is right from us to present it as ours. No claiming that Chanel herself is less Spanish, just the song. A little like the Romanian song, that was flamenco. And there are million of Spaniards, including racist Spaniards and Internet trolls. "Spaniards" did not harrase her, some a****** did. Not the same that are now proud of her.
@@Rechtauch Chanel is Cuban so there's literally zero cultural appropriation
@@finnsalsa9304 please read my last comment. I obviously mean Spain appropriating the Latin-American culture.
This is number 1 for sure. Uk was crap , ucraine pitty vote... iam portuguese and portugal gave 12 points to chanel.
It is normal that Ukraine won. Of course people wanted to support them and the song did not stink. Between UK and Spain, the UK was favoured by the juries. The Spanish song got more votes from the public. That said, como española tampoco me entusiasma Chanel. A ver, que lo hizo muy bien y que le deseo todo El éxito del mundo, pero que mandar regetton en Spanglish a Eurovision...
100%
Thats not grand final performance
Que tienes que hacer para ganar eurovision?
Pues entrar en guerra contra un país muy superior a ti y comenzar una campaña de dar pena como hicieron los ucranianos desde el inicio del festival.
Una vergüenza para eurovision y triste para un país que gana dando lastima por encima de la calidad de su artista.
Así es,con todo igual 🤷🏻♀️
Menos países bajos todas las canciones últimamente han ganado por pena. Ucrania 2 veces, Salvador Sobral diciendo que iba a ser ingresado por su corazón y le quedaba poco tiempo, Netta ya sabemos la letra de la canción... En fin
Cierto!!! Y contando que hay seis millones de ucranianos refugiados en otros países que se han votado ellos mismos , así que ......
siempre lo mismo.. este "woke world" que intenta solo compatir cualquiera cosa por pena y por sentirse una buena persona.. a la mierda.
I think that the Eurovision Song Contest has lost all credibility and trust for several reasons...:
1.- For politicizing... or letting the contest become politicized, which is a music festival and not a political one.
2.- Change, allow or allow voting to be changed, influenced or varied due to this politicization and politicized votes.
3.- Not being willing to correct and put things, votes, results and real, authentic and final positions in their correct and fair place.
If everything had been and had been given as it should have been, and according to the real and authentic votes, we could now say without a doubt that Chanel is or would have been the absolute winner of the Eurovision song and music festival..., which has been ruined by becoming a political festival that has not respected real and authentic votes, similar to how a political dictatorship acts that, in order to achieve the results it wants and aspires to, and thus be able to perpetuate itself in power, manipulates the results. And therefore, we can say that he has acted corruptly. What a pity and what horror !!!...
She was robbed !!!!!!!
Chanel is stupid to compare with Rihanna or Shakira, she is very old-fashioned and somewhat reminiscent of Oreiro
!