This was actually extremely helpful. The problem I wanted to solve was with a inclined rough plane and rough plane and I did it thanks to you! (srry if my english's bad, I'm not a native).
Hello, Nice video :) It reminds me a physical problem which I've seen as a schoolboy in 1989. I was in the national physics competition for selection of the Bulgarian team for international competitions. And one of the problem they gave us was similar to this one, but the wedge with mass M was put on a slippery floor, and the wedge can move without friction on the floor, next a block with mass m was put on the wedge, so the block slips on the wedge and the wedge also slip on the floor in the opposite direction, because of the push from the block. I cannot remember if there were friction forces or not. And possibly they searched the time the block to reach the end of the wedge, knowing the height of the wedge. I was unable to make the solution at the competition, recently I solved it :) but if it is interesting for you, you may try it. I prefer not to influence with solution.
Thank you for the video. I’m stumped on a scenario where M accelerates at a certain speed on a fixed slope and then the slope is on ice and is pushed and M slides down at slower speed and I need to find the distance M moved at its final resting place ? Do you have any insight or a video for this ?
Hi so I just have a bit of a question, I've read that newton's laws of motion are not applicable in a non-inertial frame of reference, but you seem to be using it here?
Yea, you can use Newton's laws by adding a pseudo force in the opposite direction of the acceleration at 2:57 in the video. I call it the 'additional gravity'! My previous video pseudo forces talks about it in detail - ruclips.net/video/wqGeEVl7gGs/видео.html
I have a question ; What some people do is balance the( Macos theta ) component with mgsin(theta )along the incline .But what comes in my mind is how can a horizontal force (pseudo force here) balance a component of vertical force mg here .. So are they correct or my visualisation is wrong.. Plz do answer sir
thank you, u make everything clear now. im grateful to find ur video. have a great day
Very helpful video
Stuck on it for an hour but you helped it all thanks
Very simple method to explain, Thanks for making these types of questions interesting
It's my pleasure!
This was actually extremely helpful. The problem I wanted to solve was with a inclined rough plane and rough plane and I did it thanks to you! (srry if my english's bad, I'm not a native).
Your English is great! And I am glad you were to solve your numerical.
You are my hero. I’ve been working on this problem for too long.
Superb....you did what , which was very tedious for me
Very perfect explanation..
Thanks for this awesome concept. I am searching for this video for 45 minutes & finally got it
#Kcpsir
Hello,
Nice video :) It reminds me a physical problem which I've seen as a schoolboy in 1989. I was in the national physics competition for selection of the Bulgarian team for international competitions. And one of the problem they gave us was similar to this one, but the wedge with mass M was put on a slippery floor, and the wedge can move without friction on the floor, next a block with mass m was put on the wedge, so the block slips on the wedge and the wedge also slip on the floor in the opposite direction, because of the push from the block. I cannot remember if there were friction forces or not. And possibly they searched the time the block to reach the end of the wedge, knowing the height of the wedge. I was unable to make the solution at the competition, recently I solved it :) but if it is interesting for you, you may try it. I prefer not to influence with solution.
Thank you for the video.
I’m stumped on a scenario where M accelerates at a certain speed on a fixed slope and then the slope is on ice and is pushed and M slides down at slower speed and I need to find the distance M moved at its final resting place ?
Do you have any insight or a video for this ?
Hi so I just have a bit of a question, I've read that newton's laws of motion are not applicable in a non-inertial frame of reference, but you seem to be using it here?
Yea, you can use Newton's laws by adding a pseudo force in the opposite direction of the acceleration at 2:57 in the video. I call it the 'additional gravity'!
My previous video pseudo forces talks about it in detail - ruclips.net/video/wqGeEVl7gGs/видео.html
@@Mahesh_Shenoy Thank you so much for clarifiying
@@Ateaotoko You are welcome !
Sir how can I solve it by using Inertial frame of reference?
Please, can you tell me the steps?
My pleasure.❤@@Mahesh_Shenoy
Please once solve it using inertial frame of reference
Whats the point of background music?? Very anyoing . Good explanation tho
Very helpful thank you
Very well explained 💯💯💯
Why didn't you change the direction of acc. And then solved it would be bit tough???
Very helpful thanks.
Thanks man appreciate it
I have a question ; What some people do is balance the( Macos theta ) component with mgsin(theta )along the incline .But what comes in my mind is how can a horizontal force (pseudo force here) balance a component of vertical force mg here .. So are they correct or my visualisation is wrong.. Plz do answer sir
That’s a great question! The key is that every force can be modelled to have effects in direction other than where it points
Thanks bro ❤😊
Thank u ...I was just wondering about the direction of force....it was the fake gravitational force...thanks
It's called pseudo force, aka false force
@@TheBigSnek yes it's not fake gravity ig
If blk m falls freely so what is the vlue of F
But how did you take the components of N?
Could have been explained much better.
FINALLY THE VIDEO I NEED
Im such an idiot i spent hours on the problem when all i had to do is tan
Thank you
Gracias
Aren't you the guy from Khan academy India??
yea i also think the same :') I love this guy.
Yes he is.A great fan of him🙂
Thankyou
Good explanation
#Kcpsir
i did 500th like
I did 568th like
hiindi may btaya kro