I read this in HC Verma and was confused about inertial frames and then I searched (Inertial frames) on RUclips . Guess what , The author of the book came to clear my doubts. 😅
I’m 31 now, and it’s now that I’m finding the right places to resolve my doubts. I had read Verma sir’s books throughout my senior school days but I never had an avenue to pick his brains or directly learn from him and channels like 3Blue1Brown. But now I have a newfound love for Physics and Mathematics all over again. I guess I was born too early. 😂 But I guess, I also hated to learn back then because we were learning to chase exam after exam, and not to actually understand these very concepts in an applied manner. It’s rather now that I don’t have to learn to quench the dogma of someone evaluating my knowledge that I have this rekindled love for this beautiful subject. We’re generations of victims of a flawed education system.
Thanks. From this I was able to determine my bedroom is inertial. My laundry is not accelerating toward the washroom and I'm definitely not about to apply a force to it.
Thank you for suggesting and setting up a criteria for judging weather a frame of reference is inertial or non inertial. Most teachers I know are not so clear on this subject.
Great sir No one can chalange your knowledge. Jo log dislike karte hai unka mind perfect developed nhi ha physics ko samajhne ke liye i ya to vo jealous se bhare hai.
"If u love physics then look at the black board,but if u do not have any idea about physics then just stare to his eyes and his loveable innocent smile.obviously u will fall in love with H C Verma and in Physics.." 🇧🇩🇧🇩
I think if it mainly depends on where we are seeing if we are having same accelerated then it will be inertial to us and if some other guy is seeing us who is at a rest then he finds us at non inertial frame
Very good explanation of inertial and non inertial concept. That means to say whether two frames are inertial or non inertial it depends on the observer's frame.
No! That is not what he said. He said whether a frame is inertial / non-inertial is absolute and not relative. From a frame if you see a particle not acted upon by any force accelerate, it is a non-inertial frame.
No we don't need another frame to determine if s & s' is inertial or not. Sir just gave an example to explain that it's not relative, don't take it in wrong meaning. Either a frame is inertial or non inertial, there's no relativity between them.
He is a great person and he wrote the book H.C VERMA. In that book we can find excellent problems and theory . By reading the theory and by doing the problems we can get a grip about the topic. The book is excellent.
Some statements by HC Verma Sir in this video are wrong, but this is still better than what is there in the book. 1. First improvement can be made by saying "any particle at any time" instead of "a particle" when defining Inertial Frame. HCV: If you look at A PARTICLE with no net force acting on the particle, and if from a frame of reference F if the particle has no acceleration, then the frame is inertial Better: If you look at ANY PARTICLE at ANY TIME with no net force acting on the particle, and if from a frame of reference F if the particle has no acceleration, then the frame is inertial 2. Second improvement needs to be made to incorporate rotational frames. While the above will NEVER give you a false positive for inertial frame, it may still give you a false impression for the test of inertial frame. The way relative motion is defined in HCV Book and most other books, it gives an impression that if a frame F1 is non-inertial wrt an inertial frame F0, then F1 has an acceleration wrt F0, say a1(vector). Students then wrongly imply that a particle with no acceleration wrt F0 would have an acceleration -a1(vector) wrt F1. Well, the particle may still have 0 acceleration wrt F1 as well if F1 is not translating but purely rotating wrt F0 and the particle is on its axis of rotation.
I read this in HC Verma and was confused about inertial frames and then I searched (Inertial frames) on RUclips . Guess what , The author of the book came to clear my doubts. 😅
You be like : magic w(°ｏ°)w
😂😂
@@jiya8016 according to my magic I came to know that you uses telegram for free books just like me
@@jiya8016 👏👏😂
Really is he the author ok the book
Watching hc verma sir lecture to solve hc verma book 😂😂 not even kidding
Then you are an ultra legend 😂😂😂👏
Me too😂😂😂
Me too
But lectures are topic wise and not complete
😔
@@swapnilsingh5788 you are correct
I’m 31 now, and it’s now that I’m finding the right places to resolve my doubts. I had read Verma sir’s books throughout my senior school days but I never had an avenue to pick his brains or directly learn from him and channels like 3Blue1Brown. But now I have a newfound love for Physics and Mathematics all over again. I guess I was born too early. 😂
But I guess, I also hated to learn back then because we were learning to chase exam after exam, and not to actually understand these very concepts in an applied manner. It’s rather now that I don’t have to learn to quench the dogma of someone evaluating my knowledge that I have this rekindled love for this beautiful subject. We’re generations of victims of a flawed education system.
Good luck!!
True we can fight for this together, I have found some one like me and that's you , I am thinking the same thing about education System of India
"We’re generations of victims of a flawed education system." That hit hard.
@@wildfacts8863 How do we fight this? Is there any way besides becoming a politician?
@@aakashsrivastava133 yes brother I wanna become an influence
Thanks. From this I was able to determine my bedroom is inertial. My laundry is not accelerating toward the washroom and I'm definitely not about to apply a force to it.
Wow, you're great man. Are you a Physics student??
@@name8166 fool he is in the field of physics then only he is watching this
@@rajnishkumar-ol3wu Okay, but 'fool' word doesn't sounds good bro 🙏🙏🙏.
I didn't say anything wrong. I was just asking
@@name8166 You replied to him much politely. Nowadays, people never reply like this.
@@mahigupta9717 Yeah, Humanity is best regardless how much knowledge anyone posses.
I have been trying to understand this for years, and this is by far the best explanation that I have seen on the topic. Thank you!!
studying from you is my dream a legend teaching us is the greatest thing ever thank you sir my all concepts gets cleared.
Mai physics ka student hun but i want to feel. How it's possible?
The ease with which sir teaches is amazing.
Eistein once said " Everything is relative. even my wife also"
His wife: now sign the divorce papers
😂🤭🤣🤣🤣🤣
Sweet home ALABAMA
unironically true
you are a legend sir plz keep doing videos i love physics because of you
Thank you for suggesting and setting up a criteria for judging weather a frame of
reference is inertial or non inertial.
Most teachers I know are not so clear on this subject.
I love your satisfying smile.. That says all about your passion on Physics!
I liked your English
@@devendramore9575 😍
3333333333333333333333333333433
Your simle at 5:00 was like....
Wait my children 😏physics isn't that easy
Ha ha 😈...
Yahi dekh bas tu
This man needs no ruler scale or any compass. His hands are super still
Sir u are a true legend. I was struggling with this concept from last two days but finally i got it.
The way sir concludes at last... 😅😅 superb
What an excellent explaination it was! Each and every sentence sounds very logical.
Because this is science, everything in science is logical
thank u sir, i was some confused in book but know when i came to your channel my all doubts are clear
Thank you very much sir .I couldnot understand this concept for last 6 months but today i know all the physics of this by see this video .
Such a great explaination sir , the conclusion is if you observe acceleration on a frame then the frame is non-inertial .
the best explanation of inertial fram I've found on RUclips so far
Bhi alok sir ka vhi hain
you are very good at explaining, an asset of physics you are
the best of physics teachers like alakh sir refer to ur book ur book is the best physics book and even ur teaching is really good
Greatest teacher of physics 🙌👌👌
You are amazing and your book - concepts of physics is very helpful sir. Thank you sir
I love physics because of you..... I always used to read Concepts of physics by HCV sir
When he smiles, a smile my face also comes automatically
Great sir. Very clear & satisfied explanation. Thank you sir. #Respect
in the end I got more confused than i had been ever before
Great sir
No one can chalange your knowledge. Jo log dislike karte hai unka mind perfect developed nhi ha physics ko samajhne ke liye i ya to vo jealous se bhare hai.
It was suuppeerrr! Whenever I see your video..first of all I give it a big fat thums up and then watch the video..
Perfect !! Just whats needed ! Crisp !
"If u love physics then look at the black board,but if u do not have any idea about physics then just stare to his eyes and his loveable innocent smile.obviously u will fall in love with H C Verma and in Physics.."
🇧🇩🇧🇩
True
@AP 309 so what
@AP 309 do you have any problem with that person, due to his country
@@itsDhiran those people sucks ! We give them their country but still they send rohingya and all , they don't want to friend with India
HC Verma 😘😍 😘 the great one, 😍 respect
Sir .. you are god of physics for me .. ✌🖤
Very well explained. Great video for all students. Thank you ! 🙏
Outstanding ....
Explanation ...👌👌👌
Thank you sir for such beautiful concept.....
Thanks for this video sir..
Sir teaches very well, he should write a book.
Your explanation is mind blowing
Nice sir. Lot of respect for you.
at 5:00 i said the same thing to myself, and Sir and i smiled at the same time, this feeling of understanding physics 🥰😍
Me to bro
amazing sir !!!!!!!!!!!!! very much cherished by listenting to ur vedio...................
ye dislike kis nai ki hai sir ki video he is a God of physics or jo hc Verma sir ki videos like nhi karta Matlab vo physics nhi janata
Sir you are the best concept explainer
Dhanyavaad guru ji.. 🙏
He always brings a smile on my face
Absolutely love to study physics from him❤
amazing teacher good content knowledge
👍
I think if it mainly depends on where we are seeing if we are having same accelerated then it will be inertial to us and if some other guy is seeing us who is at a rest then he finds us at non inertial frame
Sir you are very amazing and your book concept
Sir i liked..ur laugh .. at the end of the video.. And really understood better ... than before.. Thankyou sir
It is given your book volume 1
Inertial frame other than earth
...🙏🙏🙏
thank you for the great explanation.
THANK U SIR TO CLEAR BASIC DOUBTS
Very good explanation of inertial and non inertial concept. That means to say whether two frames are inertial or non inertial it depends on the observer's frame.
Well said!!!
No! That is not what he said. He said whether a frame is inertial / non-inertial is absolute and not relative. From a frame if you see a particle not acted upon by any force accelerate, it is a non-inertial frame.
Very nicely explained Sir.
Watching this video again has helped me understand it
गजब सर 👌👌🤝👍👍🇮🇳🇮🇳2nd like and comment sb mera hai🤣😁😅
Best teacher of india
i m ur big fan sir. really u shoulg be called THE GEAT TEACHER
Simply , HC VERMA god of physics concept
Thanku so much🙏 guru ji
Thank you Professor!
Sir i just wanted to be taught by you... It was my dream that came true!😇❤ feeling blessed!🙈❤😇
I am starting a pure research institute like xerox and paarc but will make it profitable.Donate on phonepe 7259293140.
Very good sir. Great.
Sir , where can we find non inertial or pure inertial reference frames ?
Thank you!
Nice video sir
You are the God of physics
Sir u r really great sir
To explain S & S' frame you still need a frame . Then why it is not relative sir?
Exactly
No we don't need another frame to determine if s & s' is inertial or not. Sir just gave an example to explain that it's not relative, don't take it in wrong meaning. Either a frame is inertial or non inertial, there's no relativity between them.
We need to see the motion of frame that it is accelerating or not but not for determining inertial or non inertial
I was actually confused in this example in HC Verma book and found it
Well this gave me inertiaception vibes... 😂
Lol😂
Superb sir👍👍💐💐
Thank you professor.
Love u maAh SMARTY sir😘😘😘😘
Once a legend always be a legend
Sir heads off to you👏👏
Wonderful Sir!
GOD AUTHOR WITH GOD CONCEPT VIDEOS OF PHYSICS
you are my best teacher
गर्दा मचा दीये सर
Just enjoyed , thankyou so much sir
I came here, didn't understand a thing then I read his book, OMG book explains better.
Could you let me know the book name and author name ?
@@wildkami1345 HC Verma
Amazing sir!!
Sir,teacher like you making physics non interesting but your book is interesting
The legend himself !
Thank u sir! This video is helpful
Sir thank you. Know I understood it perfectly
Thank you sir I now completely understood what is inertial amd non inertial now I can do the questions from your book
And now you're in IITB 😳✌️
@@ShivamSrma true
@@ShivamSrma I still watch his videos on quantum mechanics helpful for 1st semester as well
@@satyajeetiitbombay5532 Yes, I would still study his books and Lectures even when I will be employed. ✌️🤭
Thank you very much sir 👍😊
Amazing sir....... love from PAKISTAN
@Rahul Ranjan Bhai russia ka irodov bhi to India me famous hai ♥️🇮🇳 education knows no boundaries
He is a great person and he wrote the book H.C VERMA. In that book we can find excellent problems and theory . By reading the theory and by doing the problems we can get a grip about the topic. The book is excellent.
actually the name of the book is Concepts of Physics
Thanks for this video sir
Thank you so much sir for this video cleared my doubt😊
Very good explanation.
Some statements by HC Verma Sir in this video are wrong, but this is still better than what is there in the book.
1. First improvement can be made by saying "any particle at any time" instead of "a particle" when defining Inertial Frame.
HCV: If you look at A PARTICLE with no net force acting on the particle, and if from a frame of reference F if the particle has no acceleration, then the frame is inertial
Better: If you look at ANY PARTICLE at ANY TIME with no net force acting on the particle, and if from a frame of reference F if the particle has no acceleration, then the frame is inertial
2. Second improvement needs to be made to incorporate rotational frames. While the above will NEVER give you a false positive for inertial frame, it may still give you a false impression for the test of inertial frame. The way relative motion is defined in HCV Book and most other books, it gives an impression that if a frame F1 is non-inertial wrt an inertial frame F0, then F1 has an acceleration wrt F0, say a1(vector). Students then wrongly imply that a particle with no acceleration wrt F0 would have an acceleration -a1(vector) wrt F1. Well, the particle may still have 0 acceleration wrt F1 as well if F1 is not translating but purely rotating wrt F0 and the particle is on its axis of rotation.
Thanks sir very helpfull video
The great padmasree HC verma ,"The DADU of Indian Physics"🔥🔥🔥
Fantastic explanation