PUTIN Stated in 2022 " WE WILL DEMILITARIZE UKRAINE " PUTIN in 2023 " 1950 s T-54 Tanks , Chinese Golf Carts and BEGGING North Korea for Ammo " In AVDIVKA Drone Footage Russia is using 1930 s Military Trucks, The Entire World is Laughing at PUTIN as Russia Collapses ... 😀😀
They still have nukes, and even if their delivery systems are compromised, that’s STILL a lot of fissile material. Yes Russia are beaten in regular combat, but I don’t feel safe knowing what the Russians will stoop to.
In the majority of "conflicts" and "wars" over the last 200 years, it has always been the case that a country that was invaded fought back against the invader on the territory of the invader - except for the first 2 years of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. I am glad to see that changing to the historical "norm"...
Hope the plan of the President of Ukraine, with support of all allies, will succeed, peace negotiations can kick off by the countries who fight this war, and the free Russia movement will take over.
They are NOT NATO. They are veterans who have served and left the forces and fighting voluntary. They have NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO do with NATO, and NATO has nothing to do with them. They@@shaun1463
Ukraine asked for weapons and the ability to use them. Zelensky has not called for foreign troops on the front lines. It suits the US to have Ukraine attrit russia's military and exhaust their stockpiles whilst keeping the war on Ukrainian territory. NATO allies are all dependant on the US for supplies, parts, munitions or services so cannot act independently in supporting Ukraine. The US is as much a part of the problem as russia. The US is happy to protect russian skies whilst russia commits war crime after war crime in Ukraine. The war would already be over had the west been willing and able to provide the supplies and freedom to use them to Ukraine.
Every weapon that has been given to Ukraine, Russia has figured out a defense against it and now they are mostly ineffective. Why do you think they keep asking for more and different weapons ? Listening to the British is bad joke. I thought the democrats had the corner on gaslighting but the British are ridiculous
@@CountDuckEgg that’s tens of billions was given with one hand tied behind their back. The west encouraged Ukraine to launch a counter offensive, but the West would never have done the same without air cover and attack. At that point the west had not given any F-16’s… Ukraine had little chance without air support.
Could you please elaborate on what “hahaha” means - tried Google translate but your comment do not make any sense - or are you just new to the troll business?
The EU are not going to invite the UK to come and lead European defence. Forget the “born to rule” attitude and decide whether Europe or the “special relationship” with the US is the foundation for the UK as riding 2 horses ends bad.
Times Radio: “Russia’s military weakened”. CNN: “Russian military personnel will increase nearly 2.4 million, including 1.5 million troops.” Vuhledar and Pokrovsk: 😱 Edit: RUclips’s censorship has got to go!
I heard some laughing at the failed Russian missile test. I had to remind them that the Russians have lots of types we know do work. These people actually said "they've been neglected and don't work." What fools. Ukraine hit ammo dumps very accurately and at far greater range than our missiles go. So just help them ramp up production of their own... unless there is something 'some' of our missiles can do that theirs can't... such as carry none conventional weapons 😮 If we do allow it and Ukraine launches 1 a day 2 a week, then Russia is likely not going to go that final step as 1 none conventional (nuke) type couldn't annihilate Russian capability. But if a lot are launched at once or that a conventional one took out early warning systems, then Russia would be left with no choice but to assume the worst and act accordingly. I'm fed up with the silly tones of voice. People talking as though they are enlightening kids, or... well you get the idea. Where are the true diplomats. Where is Churchill. More jaw jaw means less war war
Yes, Ukraine really teaching Russia a lesson - latest lesson: ‘How to retreat 5 KMs a day and incur massive losses’. Russia doesn’t need breathing space. They were suckered before by insincere negotiations Minsk 1 and 2. They won’t be ceasing fire for Minsk 3 for sure - not until Zelensky signs on the dotted line. European defense? Russia was never a threat to Europe. Just propaganda to support US interests and NATO existence. All that Putin wanted wAs for Ukraine to be a neutral country. Don’t forget it was the US that staged a CIA coup of the 2014 democratic Ukraine government. This is not a war about democracy. It’s a war about America weakening Russia - which prior to this war was absolutely no threat whatsoever.
Russia has done great puffing its chest out; but their lack of sincerity, professionalism, diligence, their willingness to skim of the top and substitute poor quality, its really unbecoming of any country in the G20 club. I no longer fear Russia tanks steamrolling anywhere, except the recycling bin.
If China is supporting Russia with the means to create ammunition, and Putin is waiting for the Americans to run short on the ability to assist Ukraine; Why play their game; do the unthinkable and prevent further actions from Russia, China's playing its cards hopping for the right time to hit Taiwan, when America no longer has the ability to defend. This has got to be in America's best interest to put Putin in a CHECK MATE. And make peace; give Russia what they want isn't winning the war for Ukraine, Don't play their game. Time is short
In september of 2014 Putin said in a televised interview, that if he wanted to....he could take Kiev in 2 weeks. And he believed that, based on the west ignoring his stealing Crimea. almost 3 years into his special military operation, the world knows russia cant win as long as the west supports Ukraine. Putin keeps hoping the west will just quit, but they wont....and unfortunately for all russians, putin will run out of money, troops, tanks, ammo.....and once it is all gone, there is no way to replenish. The sanctions dont come off after ukraine wins. Then the war crimes tribunals and war reparations start. Russia is going to suffer for many decades paying off ukraine.
This people have no clue what they are talking about, Ukraine army gone over 1.2 million liked and injured most of the country ruined 15 million left, where are you take it from here
As the Russians pull back their ammunition depots, aircraft, troop reserves etc to be out of range of Ukranian missiles they lengthen their lines. All history has shown that this, when prolonged, can become a major problem which leads to defeat.
What people have forgotten is that it is the Ukraine, in the form of the Kievan Rus, existed long before "Russia" or even the Grand Duchy of Moscow. As political entities, Russia and the Grand Duchy, as well as a few other Russian Polities, owe their very existence to the Kievan Rus and the family that ruled it, the Rurik Dynasty. It was only in the late 13th and 14th Centuries, once the Mongols went back to eastern Asia, did Moscow and its related vassals gain the upper hand, once the power of the Kievan Rus was "farmed out" through dynastic marriages, family infighting and the like. Eventually, the Grand Duchy of Moscow became the most important and powerful of the polities and once that happened, then history saw them become the dominant force. But, as far as all the revisionist history and rhetoric coming from Moscow (and elsewhere) about "Mother Russia" and the Ukraine being a part of it, it's nothing more than deluded nonsense. In essence, "Mother Russia" owes its very existence to the Ukraine/Kievan Rus. What's even more ironic is that the Rus themselves, are not even Slavs. The original Rus were an admix of Swedes and Finns that lived and traded in the area long before even the Kievan Rus became a political entity in its own right. It was only once these people were asked by the Slavic tribal unions in the area to take over running the area because of the disunity of these tribal unions, did the Kievan Rus finally began to take shape. Over 4 centuries before Moscow itself even existed! Kiev itself existed at the time and was a strong polity in its own right, but was taken over by the Rus around 879-882AD, when Oleg the Wise united the Slavic lands and took the city, making it his power base, along with Novgorod. In any case, regardless of any of that, what we have in Putin is a former KGB operative who thinks he has a good handle on "history" and wants to, in his mind, reconstitute the old Russian Empire or some modern version of it. Not a new Soviet Union, but a modern empire based on some sort of dynastic rule, with him or his successors being in charge. An uber Slavic Union, if you will. That includes the Baltic States, Poland, the Ukraine and anyone else he cares to think should be a part of it. This needs to be nipped in the bud, now, but should've been the moment he invaded the Ukraine.
Russian military 2022 approximately 600,000 men. Russian military 2024 1.5 million men. Don’t weaken them much more or they’ll be able to conquer Europe.
Question are they gonna be on foot? Because we all know they don’t have enough planes, jets helicopters, and we all know damn sure they don’t have enough boats!
I mean all of that is true. This was always Russia's war to lose. The fact that has even gone on this long and aren't sure who is gonna win is more a story of Russian weakness rather than of Ukrainian strength. This war will cause lots of shifts in defense strategy and geo-political strategy. What does a weak russia mean? In the balance is the value of mass, the rapid adoption of automated forms of warfare - a likely rebalance of assetts and energy away from the west and to the east - presuming russia loses. If russia loses this war , the federation will fall apart. It's kind of a big deal we appreciate the depths of russian failings. I think the accumulated faults that we can all see plain as day are enough to be fatal - but empires can take a while to die.
Russia struggles to defeat a much smaller nation, and it's still not sure it will win. Russia's economy is in shambles. Russia's despotic leader is, at best, a mafia-style criminal. Russia's most advanced weapons have proven ineffective. Russia may be able to win in Ukraine, but they haven't established that yet, after 3 years. Can Russia take on NATO? Don't make me laugh.
yes.... In september of 2014 Putin said in a televised interview, that if he wanted to....he could take Kiev in 2 weeks. And he believed that, based on the west ignoring his stealing Crimea. almost 3 years into his special military operation, the world knows russia cant win as long as the west supports Ukraine. Putin keeps hoping the west will just quit, but they wont....and unfortunately for all russians, putin will run out of money, troops, tanks, ammo.....and once it is all gone, there is no way to replenish. The sanctions dont come off after ukraine wins. Then the war crimes tribunals and war reparations start. Russia is going to suffer for many decades paying off ukraine.
In september of 2014 Putin said in a televised interview, that if he wanted to....he could take Kiev in 2 weeks. And he believed that, based on the west ignoring his stealing Crimea. almost 3 years into his special military operation, the world knows russia cant win as long as the west supports Ukraine. Putin keeps hoping the west will just quit, but they wont....and unfortunately for all russians, putin will run out of money, troops, tanks, ammo.....and once it is all gone, there is no way to replenish. The sanctions dont come off after ukraine wins. Then the war crimes tribunals and war reparations start. Russia is going to suffer for many decades paying off ukraine.
Yes, even when Kiev is surrounded on all sides they will be saying ‘Ukraine has the upper hand’. I am from the UK and confirm this is just blatant, wishful thinking and inaccurate propaganda. The ability for UK citizens to receive non biased news or alternative viewpoints decreases every day. Especially the viewpoint from outside Europe. All outlets just mirror the government stance positively in terms of Ukraine.
Assuming their objectives were to wipe out their working-age male population, use up all of their weapons, and destroy their own economy then yes--Russia has succeeded.
I honestly believe that ukraine should completely surrender now as they are obviously fighting a war which they simply can not win So far the intervention has been relatively smooth, however if Zelensky continues to stall then future plans and arrangements could be severely delayed I have a Masters Degree in Political Science from the University of Exeter and I have also worked in conjunction with the U.N so I speak with experience and knowledge regarding this subject. People who have tried debating me regarding this issue have inevitably lost and switched their support and eventually agree with me Keep replies respectful, preferably you should hold the minimum of a Masters degree if you want to add a comment otherwise don't bother
Hey mister with your shinny ma.. have you taken into account the way ruZZians treat Ukrainians.. have you seen the destruction they have brought.. have you any idea of the feeling for the Ukrainian ppl.. for decades they have been trying to diverge from the purge that is the rusky mir.. surrender you say... should we have done that in 1939 or 1914.. So, you with your political science reminds me of going to uni (in Australia age 36) and being taught by some ma in management, who, incidentaly had never worked outside of acedemia and knew nothing about actually running a business.. the young student rather liked the way I could rip into him with some real life experience that ran contrary to his theories. BTW by this time I'd set up a business in Kenya, rescued 1 from bankruptcy in Austrailia and one in Fiji.. was respected for that in Fiji and was funded to start my own business.. and I left skool at 16.. mr ma!
PUTIN Stated in 2022 " WE WILL DEMILITARIZE UKRAINE " PUTIN in 2023 " 1950 s T-54 Tanks , Chinese Golf Carts and BEGGING North Korea for Ammo " In AVDIVKA Drone Footage Russia is using 1930 s Military Trucks, The Entire World is Laughing at PUTIN as Russia Collapses ... 😀😀
oh this is from the category: Ukrainian troops are boldly advancing while Russian troops are cowardly running after them))
They still have nukes, and even if their delivery systems are compromised, that’s STILL a lot of fissile material. Yes Russia are beaten in regular combat, but I don’t feel safe knowing what the Russians will stoop to.
The cope is strrrooonnngggg with this one. 😊
@@Влад-п6п7щ *Boldly retreating
@@TheTororist no, it's a joke) maybe it's hard to understand
In the majority of "conflicts" and "wars" over the last 200 years, it has always been the case that a country that was invaded fought back against the invader on the territory of the invader - except for the first 2 years of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. I am glad to see that changing to the historical "norm"...
Ukraine never asked for nato troops - just nato weapons and ammo
Hope the plan of the President of Ukraine, with support of all allies, will succeed, peace negotiations can kick off by the countries who fight this war, and the free Russia movement will take over.
Asking and wanting are not the same.
Hoping and doing also not the same.
What do you call nato countries who are fighting in ukraine currently? Foreign legien? or mercs? what do you call them? if not nato.
They are NOT NATO. They are veterans who have served and left the forces and fighting voluntary. They have NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO do with NATO, and NATO has nothing to do with them.
They@@shaun1463
dream on
Ukraine asked for weapons and the ability to use them. Zelensky has not called for foreign troops on the front lines. It suits the US to have Ukraine attrit russia's military and exhaust their stockpiles whilst keeping the war on Ukrainian territory. NATO allies are all dependant on the US for supplies, parts, munitions or services so cannot act independently in supporting Ukraine. The US is as much a part of the problem as russia. The US is happy to protect russian skies whilst russia commits war crime after war crime in Ukraine. The war would already be over had the west been willing and able to provide the supplies and freedom to use them to Ukraine.
What supplies are you talking about? If you hadn't noticed, europe has already burned through all its reserves and stockpiles
Ukraine was given tens of billions of dollars for its 2023 counteroffensive, and it didn't even breach the first defensive line.
Every weapon that has been given to Ukraine, Russia has figured out a defense against it and now they are mostly ineffective. Why do you think they keep asking for more and different weapons ? Listening to the British is bad joke. I thought the democrats had the corner on gaslighting but the British are ridiculous
@@davemccrillis1470Russia has limited defence against storm shadow. That’s why Ukraine want to use them inside Russia.
@@CountDuckEgg that’s tens of billions was given with one hand tied behind their back. The west encouraged Ukraine to launch a counter offensive, but the West would never have done the same without air cover and attack. At that point the west had not given any F-16’s… Ukraine had little chance without air support.
The spirit of Comical Ali lives on....
The british go insane!!! this channel starts deleting comments!!! ;))
Hahaha 😂😂😂😂 propaganda from the west 😂😂😂😂
Could you please elaborate on what “hahaha” means - tried Google translate but your comment do not make any sense - or are you just new to the troll business?
I can't hear the brexiteers saying don't support Europe now.
ANOTHER REHASHED EPISODE! Shameful.
bro they are milking every interview for its last drops.
The EU are not going to invite the UK to come and lead European defence. Forget the “born to rule” attitude and decide whether Europe or the “special relationship” with the US is the foundation for the UK as riding 2 horses ends bad.
…such weaknesses collapsing Ukrainian front lines all over front…what if he actually has a good day? Kiev surrenders?
Times Radio: “Russia’s military weakened”.
CNN: “Russian military personnel will increase nearly 2.4 million, including 1.5 million troops.”
Vuhledar and Pokrovsk: 😱
Edit: RUclips’s censorship has got to go!
I heard some laughing at the failed Russian missile test. I had to remind them that the Russians have lots of types we know do work. These people actually said "they've been neglected and don't work." What fools.
Ukraine hit ammo dumps very accurately and at far greater range than our missiles go. So just help them ramp up production of their own... unless there is something 'some' of our missiles can do that theirs can't... such as carry none conventional weapons 😮
If we do allow it and Ukraine launches 1 a day 2 a week, then Russia is likely not going to go that final step as 1 none conventional (nuke) type couldn't annihilate Russian capability. But if a lot are launched at once or that a conventional one took out early warning systems, then Russia would be left with no choice but to assume the worst and act accordingly.
I'm fed up with the silly tones of voice. People talking as though they are enlightening kids, or... well you get the idea.
Where are the true diplomats. Where is Churchill.
More jaw jaw means less war war
Just want to know can he still press the big button thats all???
Prof , Malcolm Charmers......What a great expert to listen too. 👍
utter propaganda more like what are his doctorates on?
Yes, Ukraine really teaching Russia a lesson - latest lesson: ‘How to retreat 5 KMs a day and incur massive losses’. Russia doesn’t need breathing space. They were suckered before by insincere negotiations Minsk 1 and 2. They won’t be ceasing fire for Minsk 3 for sure - not until Zelensky signs on the dotted line. European defense? Russia was never a threat to Europe. Just propaganda to support US interests and NATO existence. All that Putin wanted wAs for Ukraine to be a neutral country. Don’t forget it was the US that staged a CIA coup of the 2014 democratic Ukraine government. This is not a war about democracy. It’s a war about America weakening Russia - which prior to this war was absolutely no threat whatsoever.
Russia has done great puffing its chest out; but their lack of sincerity, professionalism, diligence, their willingness to skim of the top and substitute poor quality, its really unbecoming of any country in the G20 club. I no longer fear Russia tanks steamrolling anywhere, except the recycling bin.
America is cheerleading during the war😂
What beating would this be then?
Ukraine does not want to have a brake. Finnish this now. Do not let Russia get more power
You should watch the mapping channels that show activity on the front lines. It doesn’t appear you know what is really going on.
@@davemccrillis1470👈🤡you are delusional if you think that Putin is going to win win this war.
@@davemccrillis1470definitely he doesn't
If China is supporting Russia with the means to create ammunition, and Putin is waiting for the Americans to run short on the ability to assist Ukraine; Why play their game; do the unthinkable and prevent further actions from Russia, China's playing its cards hopping for the right time to hit Taiwan, when America no longer has the ability to defend. This has got to be in America's best interest to put Putin in a CHECK MATE. And make peace; give Russia what they want isn't winning the war for Ukraine, Don't play their game. Time is short
Russia has been losing for 2 years apparently. The sooner peace breaks out the better for both sides.
In september of 2014 Putin said in a televised interview, that if he wanted to....he could take Kiev in 2 weeks. And he believed that, based on the west ignoring his stealing Crimea. almost 3 years into his special military operation, the world knows russia cant win as long as the west supports Ukraine. Putin keeps hoping the west will just quit, but they wont....and unfortunately for all russians, putin will run out of money, troops, tanks, ammo.....and once it is all gone, there is no way to replenish. The sanctions dont come off after ukraine wins. Then the war crimes tribunals and war reparations start. Russia is going to suffer for many decades paying off ukraine.
Propagandist Solovyov called for Putin’s resignation: a crisis in the Kremlin. (VIDEO)
This people have no clue what they are talking about, Ukraine army gone over 1.2 million liked and injured most of the country ruined 15 million left, where are you take it from here
PNAC PROXY PUPPETS
PNAC PROXY WAR
Water is wet.
Repeat!
As the Russians pull back their ammunition depots, aircraft, troop reserves etc to be out of range of Ukranian missiles they lengthen their lines. All history has shown that this, when prolonged, can become a major problem which leads to defeat.
Remember when Russia was intimidating?
Me neither 😂
Dr. Goebbels was saying the same propaganda after Stalingrad battle😂😂😂😂
"Playing games" ?
UK only 3 billion in military aid...USA over 56 Billion dollars...Lol, uk...
EU over 150 Billion in financial aid. Just saying. US has deep stocks of old military kit parked up. EU does not.
The house of Commons library lists £12.5 billion since 2022 (about $15 billion ) UK has a population 1/7 th of the USA.
12.7 billion pounds pledged to Ukraine 🇺🇦
@@anthonyhulse1248 damn thats a lot of winter fuel allowances, child care allowances, taxes etc. poor brits suffering for a war against russia.
@@shaun1463 As a Canadian, I must admit that I get a chuckle every time a Brit whinges about winter fuel allowances. No such thing here.
Come On! Russian defense's have more holes, than Swiss Cheese 🧀 😂😂🤣🧀
You wish 😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂
The Mastermind Lammy is an ignorant joke.
What people have forgotten is that it is the Ukraine, in the form of the Kievan Rus, existed long before "Russia" or even the Grand Duchy of Moscow. As political entities, Russia and the Grand Duchy, as well as a few other Russian Polities, owe their very existence to the Kievan Rus and the family that ruled it, the Rurik Dynasty. It was only in the late 13th and 14th Centuries, once the Mongols went back to eastern Asia, did Moscow and its related vassals gain the upper hand, once the power of the Kievan Rus was "farmed out" through dynastic marriages, family infighting and the like. Eventually, the Grand Duchy of Moscow became the most important and powerful of the polities and once that happened, then history saw them become the dominant force. But, as far as all the revisionist history and rhetoric coming from Moscow (and elsewhere) about "Mother Russia" and the Ukraine being a part of it, it's nothing more than deluded nonsense. In essence, "Mother Russia" owes its very existence to the Ukraine/Kievan Rus. What's even more ironic is that the Rus themselves, are not even Slavs. The original Rus were an admix of Swedes and Finns that lived and traded in the area long before even the Kievan Rus became a political entity in its own right. It was only once these people were asked by the Slavic tribal unions in the area to take over running the area because of the disunity of these tribal unions, did the Kievan Rus finally began to take shape. Over 4 centuries before Moscow itself even existed! Kiev itself existed at the time and was a strong polity in its own right, but was taken over by the Rus around 879-882AD, when Oleg the Wise united the Slavic lands and took the city, making it his power base, along with Novgorod. In any case, regardless of any of that, what we have in Putin is a former KGB operative who thinks he has a good handle on "history" and wants to, in his mind, reconstitute the old Russian Empire or some modern version of it. Not a new Soviet Union, but a modern empire based on some sort of dynastic rule, with him or his successors being in charge. An uber Slavic Union, if you will. That includes the Baltic States, Poland, the Ukraine and anyone else he cares to think should be a part of it. This needs to be nipped in the bud, now, but should've been the moment he invaded the Ukraine.
THANK YOU 🙏
😂👍
Russian military 2022 approximately 600,000 men. Russian military 2024 1.5 million men. Don’t weaken them much more or they’ll be able to conquer Europe.
But not 1.5 million fit, strong, well trained and well armed men.
@@anthonyhulse1248 It’s looking like you might get to find out.
Question are they gonna be on foot? Because we all know they don’t have enough planes, jets helicopters, and we all know damn sure they don’t have enough boats!
@@dramadrama2x690 🤣😂 You know nothing Jon Snow
The west mouth piece
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣How did he escape from his room? 🧑🍳🧑🍳
@@petervanwyngaard4788 are you Putin's lover? You think about him much more than Russians😅😅😅😅
BS Western style
Weird man, perversively delighted to discuss some weakness of Russia.
The weaker Russia is the safer the rest of the world is.
And cue _another_ repeated 'Russia is struggling / weak / evil / losing / running-out' video with different title
😂😂
I mean all of that is true. This was always Russia's war to lose. The fact that has even gone on this long and aren't sure who is gonna win is more a story of Russian weakness rather than of Ukrainian strength.
This war will cause lots of shifts in defense strategy and geo-political strategy. What does a weak russia mean? In the balance is the value of mass, the rapid adoption of automated forms of warfare - a likely rebalance of assetts and energy away from the west and to the east - presuming russia loses. If russia loses this war , the federation will fall apart. It's kind of a big deal we appreciate the depths of russian failings. I think the accumulated faults that we can all see plain as day are enough to be fatal - but empires can take a while to die.
@@swordarmstudios6052 Good post.
Constructive and objective...
Russia struggles to defeat a much smaller nation, and it's still not sure it will win. Russia's economy is in shambles. Russia's despotic leader is, at best, a mafia-style criminal. Russia's most advanced weapons have proven ineffective.
Russia may be able to win in Ukraine, but they haven't established that yet, after 3 years. Can Russia take on NATO? Don't make me laugh.
yes.... In september of 2014 Putin said in a televised interview, that if he wanted to....he could take Kiev in 2 weeks. And he believed that, based on the west ignoring his stealing Crimea. almost 3 years into his special military operation, the world knows russia cant win as long as the west supports Ukraine. Putin keeps hoping the west will just quit, but they wont....and unfortunately for all russians, putin will run out of money, troops, tanks, ammo.....and once it is all gone, there is no way to replenish. The sanctions dont come off after ukraine wins. Then the war crimes tribunals and war reparations start. Russia is going to suffer for many decades paying off ukraine.
WEST FAKE PROPAGANDA EVERYDAY
😂😂😂😂😂😂
In september of 2014 Putin said in a televised interview, that if he wanted to....he could take Kiev in 2 weeks. And he believed that, based on the west ignoring his stealing Crimea. almost 3 years into his special military operation, the world knows russia cant win as long as the west supports Ukraine. Putin keeps hoping the west will just quit, but they wont....and unfortunately for all russians, putin will run out of money, troops, tanks, ammo.....and once it is all gone, there is no way to replenish. The sanctions dont come off after ukraine wins. Then the war crimes tribunals and war reparations start. Russia is going to suffer for many decades paying off ukraine.
Yes, even when Kiev is surrounded on all sides they will be saying ‘Ukraine has the upper hand’. I am from the UK and confirm this is just blatant, wishful thinking and inaccurate propaganda. The ability for UK citizens to receive non biased news or alternative viewpoints decreases every day. Especially the viewpoint from outside Europe. All outlets just mirror the government stance positively in terms of Ukraine.
Russia is within inches of achieving all its military objectives.
Are they? Are you aware that Ukraine has taken more land in Russia, than Russia has in Ukraine in the past 2 years
😂😂😂
An inch a year?
Assuming their objectives were to wipe out their working-age male population, use up all of their weapons, and destroy their own economy then yes--Russia has succeeded.
Ok, Ivan, whatever you say.
I honestly believe that ukraine should completely surrender now as they are obviously fighting a war which they simply can not win
So far the intervention has been relatively smooth, however if Zelensky continues to stall then future plans and arrangements could be severely delayed
I have a Masters Degree in Political Science from the University of Exeter and I have also worked in conjunction with the U.N so I speak with experience and knowledge regarding this subject. People who have tried debating me regarding this issue have inevitably lost and switched their support and eventually agree with me
Keep replies respectful, preferably you should hold the minimum of a Masters degree if you want to add a comment otherwise don't bother
Don't have an MA or MSc , so won't bother to reply , as instructed.
Hey mister with your shinny ma.. have you taken into account the way ruZZians treat Ukrainians.. have you seen the destruction they have brought.. have you any idea of the feeling for the Ukrainian ppl.. for decades they have been trying to diverge from the purge that is the rusky mir.. surrender you say... should we have done that in 1939 or 1914.. So, you with your political science reminds me of going to uni (in Australia age 36) and being taught by some ma in management, who, incidentaly had never worked outside of acedemia and knew nothing about actually running a business.. the young student rather liked the way I could rip into him with some real life experience that ran contrary to his theories. BTW by this time I'd set up a business in Kenya, rescued 1 from bankruptcy in Austrailia and one in Fiji.. was respected for that in Fiji and was funded to start my own business.. and I left skool at 16.. mr ma!
You sre smaller than you think
So now we have a d**k measuring contest?
Ok, Boris.