@@theturkishprince It is. They basically replaced corridors with an explorable map. Your actions still lead to a single outcome that based on your morality will result in one of two endings.
In forest area exodus run's the same for me. (enhanced edition ultra) But yeah GI in metro is better right now, because GSC will add hardware RT only post launch later. Thought any open area scene stalker 2 look's way more detailed - wich is expected, one game is past gen, and one current gen
Forgot the immersive npc interactions "speak to our boss" , speak to our boss " , talk to our boss , speak with our boss, talk to the man in charge , speak to our boss ......
@@TeamYellowBS Should be something of it soon, their roadmap showed a new metro game following Metro Awakening in 202(x). I hope Artyom and Ana get to settle down, The ending of Exodus... Poor guy caught more Radiation in Novosibirsk than he did all of the 3 metro games and books combined. I don't think he has any shot of having health kids with Ana. I guess we'll have to wait and see :)
I hope we get a different story. in the new Metro game..... like Stalker 2 did.... a real open world Metro game where you can seamlessly travel from one station to the next. That would be great. They should ende Artyom's story with Exodus and give us a new interessting character. And please... this time someone who talks in cutscenes.... It annoyed the hell out of me that Artyom only talked in the loading screens but never during the gameplay itself....
@@Black0raz0rI highly doubt they will make a new character/setting russian. Moreover, I’m not sure that they even still have copyrights to use the Metro universe. The future of the franchise is unclear
Guys, the Zone lives in you even when you finish Stalker once or multiple times, what's left for you after you finished each of Metro games? Metro is just a game in the end but Stalker is definitely not just a game.
Then I play the, again some years later, like you reread a good book, or rewatch a good movie. I love Stalker, but the story of metro is amazing. I read the books too after I played 2033 when it came out. It makes you go through emotions that stalker would never be able to. I never felt emotionally attached in stalker like I did in metro. I almost cried in the end of Exodus. I think I played all of them 5-7 times over the years. Stalker has the zone ™ - but compared to Anomaly, Stalker 2 feels superficial. A lot bc the 100m radius around you is just laughable. - but why not have a 3d pda? Why no ranks and factions you can join? Stalker to me is about not feeling like the main character on rails - like metro. Stalker 2 tries hard now to also be this bombastic cutscene driven story experience, while that was never why I played stalker.
Lack of 3D PDA really puts dent on the immersion, i played Exodus on a Steam Deck as well where i couldn't see shit of what was written on the journal yet i'd still take that 10 million times over a flat jpeg slapped on your screen
@@Riddle99-v7q Yes but those were made in 2007-9, also different budgets, scopes etc. In Stalker 2 everything Is so high quality that something like that sticks out like a sore thumb.
@davidbueso3840 I think there are too many open-world games these days. What Exodus did was great: a linear story with open locations to explore. No need to run 3 km just to get from point A to point B. No endless question marks and points of interest.
Metro Exodus is not fully Open world like STALKER 2.. But both are good in its own ways... I liked both.. Both are worth playing... Metro released with good optimization where as STALKER still improving in performance with frequent updates
very true.... many forget that Stalker 2 just came out and has a seamless 64km² Open World compared to the very story driven Metro games. I also like both games and both franchises. but Stalker 2 has something I like more... the realism in the game compared to Metro.
as a fan of stalker back in the days and metro I think that both are awesome games with each one having special things on their own, but overall and after finishing stalker 2 I can say that metro is more polished in their mechanics and performance, and stalker is better visually
Stalker 2 has an around 64 km² huge seamless Open World compared to Metro Exodus and was just released 5 weeks ago..... Also Metro is al lot mor scripted than Stalker. Metro is way more Story driven and takes the Player by the Hand quite literally.... Also the Devs of Stalker 2 had way more problems than 4 A games ever had. originally it was announced for 2012 but they had to close the studio for a while because of money issues, some years later when they reopened the studio and started to develop the game again the Ukrainian War started and had to develop the game while some of the devs had to join the military to fight for Ukraine....
@@leverkmetyour point still stands. However how can you compare an almost 6 yo game that had many updates and even a enhanced/remastered game 4 years ago. Stalker just came out and hasn't even been a year. They just released a life patch witch is making the game much more immersive. Lets not talk about the back to back patches within nearly 2 months. Imagine the time of a year and or 6 years like metro. And, being open world, you're decision not like metro which is a linear narrative with some open environments. Both games are great and I enjoy both. At this moment, im being honest and just played stalker 2 in the beginning andnstopped, because like you said is not polished yet. However, im on console so I'm waiting for the patch to arrive and will be getting on when it arrives.
@@davidbueso3840 my opinion is based on the actual state of the game. of course performance wise it's going to improve with the time, but i still think that some of the metro mechanics and interface are way more polished, but that's game design. i don't really care if one game is more linear than the other, i love both games and i'm looking forward on seeing future stalker updates. the game has so much potential and it's something metro will never be able to compete with
After 70 hours of playing Stalker 2 I finally finished it and enjoyed it. Although my experience was not very good overall. I just started a game of Sam's Story (Metro Exodus) and I'm sorry but... Metro is another level of game. Stalker 2 is still in its infancy.
yeah, well, metro had its own world. i loved its story, and, i would say, that the best thing i liked in them (the trilogy, i could say) was the gas mask and its animations/graphics. but, the spiderweb+gas lighter were great too. and of course, what you mentioned too, the menus. they were cool :) stalker 2 however had a much greater world (in a way), the story took you not straightforward (i mean in the direction, kinda) but a lot of directions so to speak, way more animations for the equipments, and what you mentioned, the characters of the world. also, the story line is way longer (or it feels to me) in S2, than metro per game, i mean (although, i have to say, that i played the 3 metro games, but only stalker 2, not the stalker trilogy...)
It's hard to pick. I love both games, for some of the same reasons, and for some different reasons. Exodus was way ahead of its time and still stands strong to this day. They had some very "forward" thinking aspects in that game that other developers would do well to take notice. For Stalker 2, i actually don't mind the flat PDA on a flat screen. They were all like that, and it's part of the nostalgia. What would be cool in Stalker 2, is to either be able to keep your map on a Compass (N/S/E/W) orientation, OR in a navigational mode that rotates with your direction of travel, kind of like GPS in your car. And also zoom in just a little further.
Stalker all the way. Sure, at some places it has problems but in general, it is better looking than Metro. Take a PDA for example. In metro it's a object that you hold in your hands. While it's immersive, you can't see crap because it is too small and thus the icons on the PDA's screen are even smaller, and you either have to deal with tweaking FOV or something else. In Stalker however, it's a full screen PDA, so that you see your icons and objectives better and understand, what you are looking at. Sure, it's less immersive but, as a person who plays video games for fun and not for realism that I have too much in my life, I rather take full JPEG on screen to see my objectives than small object that I have to zoom in on, in order to see what I'm looking at. Also, the ripples in Metro looks unrealistic. They simply look like a splash wave. Now try to shoot with real weapon in to, let's say a paddle full of water. The splashes from it gonna wash your face in no time, making also your clothes wet. Thus Stalker 2 does it better. Sure, the splashes are not as crazy as in real life but again, I ain't playing games for realism so it's fine by me. On top of that, all of the extra animations and stuff gives you an idea of how much developers wanted their game to be good despite all the odds that they went through. Yes, the game is still have problems, despite patches, but name at least one game that doesn't these days? On top of that, adding the fact that Stalker 2 avoided been woke like many modern AAA games, it makes Stalker 2 like a fresh air in a stench of all that modern AAA crap. p.s - Don't forget that Metro was also made by people who worked on very first Stalker game. That's right! 4A Games was founded by the same people, who worked on original Stalker games. So if you had a thought that both games feel similar, then you are not wrong in that regard.
I like Metro's tablet more than Stalker's PDA, simply because it's less common to see menus built into the game's world. But I fully understand your preferences. Also, thank you for sharing your thoughts with us!
@@TeamYellowBS No problem. I'm happy to share my thoughts with people who understand me. Also, Far Cry 2 did this tablet thing way back in 2008. Only difference is that, instead of tablet it had a paper map.
Ive played the crap out of both the Stalker and the Metro series. Im sure most here have. Both games are unique and similar in their own way, both absolutely fantastic. Stalker is hard, unforgiving, until you learn what your doing and figure out your way around the zone. You start a scared little baby, then turn into a master of the zone. Metro is a hard, linear, story driven experience with great gunplay, tense moments and fights. Pick your poison
Stalker definitely has the best weapon jamming animations. Really shows you the struggle in unjamming your gun. Metro you just reload by the looks of it. Well not really reload but you get what I mean💀
I will say Metro has the cool unique weapon designs going for them. Stalker uses real weapons instead of making their own up besides the Gauss weaponry💀
Both games are fantastic and a top tier! Also they both have advantages and disadvantages. Some features from Exodus i would like to see in Stalker 2 and vice versa. Wish we could easily modify both of the games, to make them them look almost perfect
I don't know if it's fixed but a lot of graphic problems in Stalker 2. The Depth of the world looks better in Metro, And i haven't seen things dissapear in distance like in stalker 2 and i hate that in games!
сравнивать игру, вышедшую в начале 2019 года, и игру, вышедшую в конце 2024 года это конечно уровень, а вот давайте серьезно, сравним сталкер 2 и аномали гамму? простой мод
Metro Exodus (2019) VS Stalker 2 (2024) and yet metro look better , to be fair stalker 2 as play style look like a fallout games, don't get me wrong Stalker 2 is fun and one of the best games of this year 😊
Think they've patched some of these on Stalker recently. NPCs now shoot if you repeatably unholster your firearm and the radiation kill timer has been increased. GSC have released like 3 patches in the last 3 or 4 days
METRO will NEVER be near STALKER. I dont understand why people compare them so much. METRO is a Nuclear Winter/Post apocaliptic game in russia, Stalker is not that
Anomaly/ GAMMA is a reaaallly hard to beat game once you really experienced it. But i'm sure Modders will improve stalker 2 in the same fashion . And i'll be there for it.
Some of these are completely wrong you can drown in exodus they just give you 1 to 2 chances before you do. Plus radiation will kill you. I'm sorry for someone who's played both and enjoy both this video is very biased to one side and lying about the other game.
Why do I need to make perfect conditions to die from the environment in Metro? If a player gets damage from radiation, why does it stop after some time? Radiation be like: Aight, damaged him enough, now I gotta bounce!
Geez, if Stalker 2 looks like shit to you, I'm scared to imagine what your idea of good graphics is. I mean, I don't deny the issue of poor performance, but Stalker is among the most visually detailed games out there.
@@TeamYellowBS I'm referring in particular to the controls and the way the character moves. It's absolutely horrible and they never wanted to refine either one.
Because of bugs? Um... zero. The only major problem that I had is fps drops to 2-3 frames. And they still haven't fixed it yet, which is a shame. But talking about quest softlocks, then yeah. Quest in Zalissya is broken, and Lodochka didn't open the door. But you can still finish the story without those quests
@@TeamYellowBS scientist bunker - totally forgot about this. And again - lucky one. I had to load so many previous saves... Especially in Foundation, also in one of X laboratory, where I had to complete about 10 minute part with mutants without dying, because every saved state in this part was broken and unable to load. I have hard time to have warm thoughts about GSC because of all times when I was really frustrated during gameplay, which has never happened in Metro
@@Hylaaea No idea what you are on about. You either have a potato or are using mods that's breaking it. I've played through it two times and never had any of the issues you are dreaming up. Yes, the game is in a bad state, but you're exaggerating it to the extreme.
its like comparing apples to oranges. I do not understand why so many people say these two games are similar. besides the fact that they both take place in eastern europe and are FPS, they feel very different.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
![S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: HoC Anti-Aliasing And Upscaler Test @1080p [ Ryzen 5 3600 • RTX 2060 Super]](/img/1.gif)
Metro is linear, Stalker 2 is an extremely large world and requires a lot more work to make.
But GSC make it very bad
metro exodus..... is not a linear game
@@theturkishprince it is
@@theturkishprince It is. They basically replaced corridors with an explorable map.
Your actions still lead to a single outcome that based on your morality will result in one of two endings.
@@DaimeneX Hm. Okay then, compare exodus to the titles that came before it, they're obvious extremely different levels of "linear".
Both fantastic games, different but both worth your time.
exactly
I love both, but Exodus Looks Fantastic, a lot more clear and less blurry and yet still it runs 100 times better than stalker 2
That's probably because Exodus already has 4 years of updates under his belt + an enhanced edition.
In forest area exodus run's the same for me. (enhanced edition ultra)
But yeah GI in metro is better right now, because GSC will add hardware RT only post launch later. Thought any open area scene stalker 2 look's way more detailed - wich is expected, one game is past gen, and one current gen
Might be time for a PC upgrade if STALKER is looking blurry
@@poundtown808 yeah man, gotta get that 4090 for that sweet constant 60 FPS.
You do know that there are other GPUs besides the 4090
Forgot the immersive npc interactions
"speak to our boss" , speak to our boss " , talk to our boss , speak with our boss, talk to the man in charge , speak to our boss ......
if a random dude just came up to you and wanted to speak with you I'm not sure how else you'd respond. no one paying them to talk lmao
I got to say stalker considering that it just released with some of their main directors fighting in the war right now
Proud Son and Father moment. :)
Waiting for the Metro 4
@@TeamYellowBS Should be something of it soon, their roadmap showed a new metro game following Metro Awakening in 202(x).
I hope Artyom and Ana get to settle down, The ending of Exodus... Poor guy caught more Radiation in Novosibirsk than he did all of the 3 metro games and books combined. I don't think he has any shot of having health kids with Ana. I guess we'll have to wait and see :)
Maybe the bad ending will be canon🤔
I hope we get a different story. in the new Metro game..... like Stalker 2 did.... a real open world Metro game where you can seamlessly travel from one station to the next. That would be great.
They should ende Artyom's story with Exodus and give us a new interessting character. And please... this time someone who talks in cutscenes.... It annoyed the hell out of me that Artyom only talked in the loading screens but never during the gameplay itself....
@@Black0raz0rI highly doubt they will make a new character/setting russian. Moreover, I’m not sure that they even still have copyrights to use the Metro universe. The future of the franchise is unclear
Guys, the Zone lives in you even when you finish Stalker once or multiple times, what's left for you after you finished each of Metro games? Metro is just a game in the end but Stalker is definitely not just a game.
Then I play the, again some years later, like you reread a good book, or rewatch a good movie. I love Stalker, but the story of metro is amazing. I read the books too after I played 2033 when it came out. It makes you go through emotions that stalker would never be able to. I never felt emotionally attached in stalker like I did in metro. I almost cried in the end of Exodus. I think I played all of them 5-7 times over the years. Stalker has the zone ™ - but compared to Anomaly, Stalker 2 feels superficial. A lot bc the 100m radius around you is just laughable. - but why not have a 3d pda? Why no ranks and factions you can join? Stalker to me is about not feeling like the main character on rails - like metro. Stalker 2 tries hard now to also be this bombastic cutscene driven story experience, while that was never why I
played stalker.
Stalker > metro
Lack of 3D PDA really puts dent on the immersion, i played Exodus on a Steam Deck as well where i couldn't see shit of what was written on the journal yet i'd still take that 10 million times over a flat jpeg slapped on your screen
Totally agree!
I mean the PDA's were like that in the previous Stalker games also
True, but the old stalker games still shove your face into that PDA
@@Riddle99-v7q Yes but those were made in 2007-9, also different budgets, scopes etc.
In Stalker 2 everything Is so high quality that something like that sticks out like a sore thumb.
Stop mistaking moded stalker with vanilla stalker
Stalker 2 all day.👌
I like exodus's gunplay better also prefer real time map to stalker 2's fullscreen pda
Gunplay is debatable, but the rest is true
I love both games. I REALLY hope metro will come out with an open world game the size of Stalker 2 on there own engine. That would be amazing!
I don't think we need another open world
OH YES! That would be so great travel seamlessly from one Metro Station to the next and the next and the next would be amazing
@@TeamYellowBSwhy do you say that? You like linear stories? Ib enjoy great stories, however exploring the vast post apocalyptic world.
@davidbueso3840 I think there are too many open-world games these days. What Exodus did was great: a linear story with open locations to explore. No need to run 3 km just to get from point A to point B. No endless question marks and points of interest.
@@TeamYellowBS yea, that's true. I think Metro did an excellent job with given best of both worlds.
Metro Exodus is not fully Open world like STALKER 2.. But both are good in its own ways... I liked both.. Both are worth playing... Metro released with good optimization where as STALKER still improving in performance with frequent updates
very true.... many forget that Stalker 2 just came out and has a seamless 64km² Open World compared to the very story driven Metro games.
I also like both games and both franchises. but Stalker 2 has something I like more... the realism in the game compared to Metro.
I never got warm with metro, Stalker 2 instead had me from the first hour
Exodus doesn't get good until you reach the first "open world" area.
@@Skrenja i have a problem with the synchro of this games in the first line.
as a fan of stalker back in the days and metro I think that both are awesome games with each one having special things on their own, but overall and after finishing stalker 2 I can say that metro is more polished in their mechanics and performance, and stalker is better visually
Stalker 2 has an around 64 km² huge seamless Open World compared to Metro Exodus and was just released 5 weeks ago.....
Also Metro is al lot mor scripted than Stalker. Metro is way more Story driven and takes the Player by the Hand quite literally....
Also the Devs of Stalker 2 had way more problems than 4 A games ever had. originally it was announced for 2012 but they had to close the studio for a while because of money issues, some years later when they reopened the studio and started to develop the game again the Ukrainian War started and had to develop the game while some of the devs had to join the military to fight for Ukraine....
@Black0raz0r what's your point? my point still stands
@@leverkmetyour point still stands. However how can you compare an almost 6 yo game that had many updates and even a enhanced/remastered game 4 years ago. Stalker just came out and hasn't even been a year. They just released a life patch witch is making the game much more immersive. Lets not talk about the back to back patches within nearly 2 months. Imagine the time of a year and or 6 years like metro. And, being open world, you're decision not like metro which is a linear narrative with some open environments. Both games are great and I enjoy both. At this moment, im being honest and just played stalker 2 in the beginning andnstopped, because like you said is not polished yet. However, im on console so I'm waiting for the patch to arrive and will be getting on when it arrives.
@@davidbueso3840 my opinion is based on the actual state of the game. of course performance wise it's going to improve with the time, but i still think that some of the metro mechanics and interface are way more polished, but that's game design. i don't really care if one game is more linear than the other, i love both games and i'm looking forward on seeing future stalker updates. the game has so much potential and it's something metro will never be able to compete with
1:13 Wanna do that again?
Good Hunting, Stalker
4:20 What is the music in the video?
They have jumping grasshoppers in stalker, really cool.
I don’t need to watch to know metro takes this easily, but stalker 2 is still very impressive as I’m playing it now.
After 70 hours of playing Stalker 2 I finally finished it and enjoyed it. Although my experience was not very good overall. I just started a game of Sam's Story (Metro Exodus) and I'm sorry but... Metro is another level of game. Stalker 2 is still in its infancy.
Thats why I haven't played it yet waiting till a big patch
Both games are good. BTW Metro game egine authors are the same guys who made X-Ray game engine for the original Stalker.
Metro looks great and runs so much better. I like Stalker but the Metro atmosphere is hard to beat.
yeah, well, metro had its own world. i loved its story, and, i would say, that the best thing i liked in them (the trilogy, i could say) was the gas mask and its animations/graphics. but, the spiderweb+gas lighter were great too. and of course, what you mentioned too, the menus. they were cool :)
stalker 2 however had a much greater world (in a way), the story took you not straightforward (i mean in the direction, kinda) but a lot of directions so to speak, way more animations for the equipments, and what you mentioned, the characters of the world. also, the story line is way longer (or it feels to me) in S2, than metro per game, i mean (although, i have to say, that i played the 3 metro games, but only stalker 2, not the stalker trilogy...)
I love both! Great vid.
What's the song used here?
Thank you!
It's just some post-punk from stocktune, I don't remember the names
You can die fro radiation and drown in water in Metro. That happened to me many times.
You can definitely drown is stalker 2 The amount of times I’ve died by drowning in that game is insane
You mean like this 16:18?
It's hard to pick. I love both games, for some of the same reasons, and for some different reasons. Exodus was way ahead of its time and still stands strong to this day. They had some very "forward" thinking aspects in that game that other developers would do well to take notice. For Stalker 2, i actually don't mind the flat PDA on a flat screen. They were all like that, and it's part of the nostalgia. What would be cool in Stalker 2, is to either be able to keep your map on a Compass (N/S/E/W) orientation, OR in a navigational mode that rotates with your direction of travel, kind of like GPS in your car. And also zoom in just a little further.
Imagine Stalker 6 before GTA 6🤔
don't you mean Stalker 5 since we just got Stalker 4 (Stalker 2: Heart of Chernobyl/Chornobyl)
@@TeamYellowBS lol fixed, I meant Stalker 2. But yeah, Stalker 6 definitely before GTA 6.
You can drown in Stalker 2, down near the swamps. Happened to me once
16:18
Stalker all the way. Sure, at some places it has problems but in general, it is better looking than Metro. Take a PDA for example. In metro it's a object that you hold in your hands. While it's immersive, you can't see crap because it is too small and thus the icons on the PDA's screen are even smaller, and you either have to deal with tweaking FOV or something else. In Stalker however, it's a full screen PDA, so that you see your icons and objectives better and understand, what you are looking at. Sure, it's less immersive but, as a person who plays video games for fun and not for realism that I have too much in my life, I rather take full JPEG on screen to see my objectives than small object that I have to zoom in on, in order to see what I'm looking at. Also, the ripples in Metro looks unrealistic. They simply look like a splash wave. Now try to shoot with real weapon in to, let's say a paddle full of water. The splashes from it gonna wash your face in no time, making also your clothes wet. Thus Stalker 2 does it better. Sure, the splashes are not as crazy as in real life but again, I ain't playing games for realism so it's fine by me. On top of that, all of the extra animations and stuff gives you an idea of how much developers wanted their game to be good despite all the odds that they went through. Yes, the game is still have problems, despite patches, but name at least one game that doesn't these days? On top of that, adding the fact that Stalker 2 avoided been woke like many modern AAA games, it makes Stalker 2 like a fresh air in a stench of all that modern AAA crap.
p.s - Don't forget that Metro was also made by people who worked on very first Stalker game. That's right! 4A Games was founded by the same people, who worked on original Stalker games. So if you had a thought that both games feel similar, then you are not wrong in that regard.
I like Metro's tablet more than Stalker's PDA, simply because it's less common to see menus built into the game's world. But I fully understand your preferences. Also, thank you for sharing your thoughts with us!
Reading this felt awful, but I respect your opinion.
@@TeamYellowBS No problem. I'm happy to share my thoughts with people who understand me.
Also, Far Cry 2 did this tablet thing way back in 2008. Only difference is that, instead of tablet it had a paper map.
@@jonasblanchebarbe The feeling mutual.
Ive played the crap out of both the Stalker and the Metro series. Im sure most here have.
Both games are unique and similar in their own way, both absolutely fantastic.
Stalker is hard, unforgiving, until you learn what your doing and figure out your way around the zone. You start a scared little baby, then turn into a master of the zone.
Metro is a hard, linear, story driven experience with great gunplay, tense moments and fights.
Pick your poison
Stalker definitely has the best weapon jamming animations. Really shows you the struggle in unjamming your gun. Metro you just reload by the looks of it. Well not really reload but you get what I mean💀
I will say Metro has the cool unique weapon designs going for them. Stalker uses real weapons instead of making their own up besides the Gauss weaponry💀
I played both, Stalker 2 its better.
Understandable
you can drown in exodus if you cant climb back onto anything. one of the shrimp creeatures will get you!
Doesn't it consider a death from a mutant?
@ that is a good point. I guess you’re right.
But he wasn’t exactly going to survive anyway.
Yea, shrimps are annoying, especially when you're in the boat
@@TeamYellowBS they are. I’m just trying to enjoy my scenic boat trip with the cool water effects. Leave me alone
Each game is different and unique
12:49 that's very satisfying for some reason
Both games are fantastic and a top tier!
Also they both have advantages and disadvantages. Some features from Exodus i would like to see in Stalker 2 and vice versa.
Wish we could easily modify both of the games, to make them them look almost perfect
devs at gsc leave for 4A games
but metros series are better on many points
Too bad metro is not a open world, but the last one is semi-open
I don't know if it's fixed but a lot of graphic problems in Stalker 2.
The Depth of the world looks better in Metro, And i haven't seen things dissapear in distance like in stalker 2 and i hate that in games!
сравнивать игру, вышедшую в начале 2019 года, и игру, вышедшую в конце 2024 года это конечно уровень, а вот давайте серьезно, сравним сталкер 2 и аномали гамму? простой мод
Metro is a better game, Stalker after some time you get bored of the long walks
Radiation does kill you in metro. Ive died not wearing a mask.
Ukrainian game development knows what the gamers and fans really like and want.
Metro Exodus (2019) VS Stalker 2 (2024) and yet metro look better , to be fair stalker 2 as play style look like a fallout games, don't get me wrong Stalker 2 is fun and one of the best games of this year 😊
Depend of graphics. With 4090 Stalker on Epic settings with aand right setup (HDR, DLSS,...) looks incredibly good. One of the best
@@bernymonty22 Oh wow I need to upgrade my PC then 😅
Think they've patched some of these on Stalker recently. NPCs now shoot if you repeatably unholster your firearm and the radiation kill timer has been increased. GSC have released like 3 patches in the last 3 or 4 days
Yes, I recorded this video before the patch came out
slavjank titans go toe to toe!
stalker good art but is unreal engine graphic game we see in a lot of tittles,so metro exodus is better more original
Stalker 2 is a great game but it is the buggiest game I've played in a long time. It will bring down the whole system after awhile.
METRO will NEVER be near STALKER. I dont understand why people compare them so much. METRO is a Nuclear Winter/Post apocaliptic game in russia, Stalker is not that
What music is this?
Idk man walking around for 40 minutes straight i prefer Exodus
Yea, we need more guides in the zone
Modded Stalker > Stalker 2 or any Stalker like game (metro)
Anomaly/ GAMMA is a reaaallly hard to beat game once you really experienced it. But i'm sure Modders will improve stalker 2 in the same fashion . And i'll be there for it.
Ones way more linear in comparison
Some of these are completely wrong you can drown in exodus they just give you 1 to 2 chances before you do. Plus radiation will kill you. I'm sorry for someone who's played both and enjoy both this video is very biased to one side and lying about the other game.
Why do I need to make perfect conditions to die from the environment in Metro? If a player gets damage from radiation, why does it stop after some time? Radiation be like: Aight, damaged him enough, now I gotta bounce!
“Exodus runs 100 times better”.. probably because it’s focused on a storyline and you are limited to where and what you do. You num nuts 😂
Metro wins because I can increase the weapon pov.
But the FOV setting is broken in metro🤔
@ not for me. When I increase FOV In metro weapon FOV increases. I am on console.
Well, I'm not familiar with the console version, but on PC, the FOV slider does practically nothing
@ metro slider does something while stalker slider actually does nothing
Stalker's problem is that the FOV slider is locked to the world and not the viewmodel
bro youre nitpicking, both game have flaws why not pick those to feature. -1
Metro is way better than stalker by a long shot
STalker 2 looks like shit for a AAA Game in 2024 and is a Poor Performance Memory Leak mess
Geez, if Stalker 2 looks like shit to you, I'm scared to imagine what your idea of good graphics is. I mean, I don't deny the issue of poor performance, but Stalker is among the most visually detailed games out there.
your gpu 750 ti 😂
The gameplay of Exodus is pure scrap in comparison of Stalker 2. The game have great first look graphics, but is a gameplay disaster in comparison.
I think Metro is still a great game that is worth playing
While understandable
Exodus gameplay is different from stalker 2
@Freedomer3 True! Metro wants you to be a stealthy pacifist, while in Stalker 2 you can be a tank that kills half of the zone
@@TeamYellowBS especially when enemies only drop ammo and scraps. Also metro is completely relying on scavenging
@@TeamYellowBS I'm referring in particular to the controls and the way the character moves. It's absolutely horrible and they never wanted to refine either one.
The very first Stalker is still the best. Stalker 2 will be really good in the next few months/years.
Metro Exodus weapon better
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Metro is better than S2, becouse you could actually finish main story on premiere 😂
I successfully finished Stalker 2 before the first patch
@TeamYellowBS lucky one. How many previous saves you had to load because of bugs? 😂 And Zalysia rescue mission?
Because of bugs? Um... zero. The only major problem that I had is fps drops to 2-3 frames. And they still haven't fixed it yet, which is a shame. But talking about quest softlocks, then yeah. Quest in Zalissya is broken, and Lodochka didn't open the door. But you can still finish the story without those quests
@@TeamYellowBS scientist bunker - totally forgot about this. And again - lucky one. I had to load so many previous saves... Especially in Foundation, also in one of X laboratory, where I had to complete about 10 minute part with mutants without dying, because every saved state in this part was broken and unable to load. I have hard time to have warm thoughts about GSC because of all times when I was really frustrated during gameplay, which has never happened in Metro
@@Hylaaea No idea what you are on about. You either have a potato or are using mods that's breaking it. I've played through it two times and never had any of the issues you are dreaming up. Yes, the game is in a bad state, but you're exaggerating it to the extreme.
срулкер 2 жалкая поделка на урино энжн фуйф
its like comparing apples to oranges. I do not understand why so many people say these two games are similar. besides the fact that they both take place in eastern europe and are FPS, they feel very different.