To be strongly against someone else or other people's way of looking at things is bigotry, anyone that throws around the word bigot is probably an idiot. As for you Kipling , I remember you you're a fucking Chomsky troll , I've read your pathetic and dishonest arguments on other Chomsky vids . You always say the same dumb line about Chomsky and still expect us to take you seriously lol?
Yeah, I dunno. a lot of this stuff sounds made up. It's a near miss because it's a miss.. "Near" is used as an adjective, like a "close miss". it certainly wasn't a "far miss" or a "wide miss".
My Father, it’s how comfortable where’s home is or with house we live, if we leave who we are by understanding adaptation . The ways of multilateral development and equality means much more than almighty togetherness not the by the international laws but the powerful hurtful ways as the USA lost thinking it self of international laws stand for our lives 🙏🏼.
When I learned his wisdom, I am the first with white flags. We’re all in conscious without the truth but illustrates. How’s goodness together without convictions. More than to love him but to go much in tryouts to be Human with humbling on one beautiful way 🙏🏼😀 .
In “How to balance inequality” on RUclips, A few calls to a friend in the White House about an inheritance cap to let people redistribute their wealth fairly, realigns man's mission here with his natural, higher purpose. How to balance inequality
This Chomsky lecture was stolen from some university recording and the person who stole it and posted it here also deleted the introduction which identified where and when and under what circumstances under which the talk was given. Does anyone know where the original recording can be found so I can listen to the full lecture?
1:50:29 I thought this was an interesting questions and I think it's probably true too. I got my thinking about the English word "Meow" which is the sound we hear a cat making versus "Nyan" which is how the Japanese hear it.
How’s much more for fakes on laws respect and control over the United family reasons for we uphold for destroying their rights on civilians living 🥲, and power screening for human beings living likely Palestinians without borders sovereignty with Israel invading please ? If’s no self conscious opinion consider with weapons justifying overseas us ?
soooo glad the boston fog didn't settle 10 minutes earlier.
:)
this is the best Chomsky talk I've heard on RUclips!
I agree. I love these long lectures rather than 6-10 minute clips. This one is also one of my favorites: ruclips.net/video/D5in5EdjhD0/видео.html
I’m curious if Carlin found his "Near Miss" joke from this lecture.
I love these videos where he can speak freely about theoretical subjects and not have to explain everything due to assumed knowledge.
Not always the case. If you listen to many of his talks, he has to dumb it down quite alot
+Rudyard Kipling Wow dude. I feel bad for you lol
To be strongly against someone else or other people's way of looking at things is bigotry, anyone that throws around the word bigot is probably an idiot. As for you Kipling , I remember you you're a fucking Chomsky troll , I've read your pathetic and dishonest arguments on other Chomsky vids . You always say the same dumb line about Chomsky and still expect us to take you seriously lol?
How do you like the new cabinet ? Chris Christie, Sarah Palin, Rudy Giuliani, Bolton lol yup the right got it right this time .
Yes agree that asking the right questions is harder!
Noam Chomsky: Telling the right truths...
54:20 George Carlin definitely heard this!
+Rich H. (Dymdez) at 54:30!
Yeah, I dunno. a lot of this stuff sounds made up. It's a near miss because it's a miss.. "Near" is used as an adjective, like a "close miss". it certainly wasn't a "far miss" or a "wide miss".
I've noticed for a while from what he's said in his acts and in interviews that Carlin definitely read and was familiar with Chomsky.
@@themodfather9382 Yes, a better example might be "I could care less". Or if we include intonation as part of grammar, uptalking.
QUESTION:
Does anyone know the TITLE of this TALK?
My Father, it’s how comfortable where’s home is or with house we live, if we leave who we are by understanding adaptation . The ways of multilateral development and equality means much more than almighty togetherness not the by the international laws but the powerful hurtful ways as the USA lost thinking it self of international laws stand for our lives 🙏🏼.
When I learned his wisdom, I am the first with white flags. We’re all in conscious without the truth but illustrates. How’s goodness together without convictions. More than to love him but to go much in tryouts to be Human with humbling on one beautiful way 🙏🏼😀 .
What are you even saying
In “How to balance inequality” on RUclips, A few calls to a friend in the White House about an inheritance cap to let people redistribute their wealth fairly, realigns man's mission here with his natural, higher purpose.
How to balance inequality
It is a pleasure always to listen to Chonky.
Ah, Chonky, the foremost linguist of the 20th century.
what's the date, and place?
This Chomsky lecture was stolen from some university recording and the person who stole it and posted it here also deleted the introduction which identified where and when and under what circumstances under which the talk was given. Does anyone know where the original recording can be found so I can listen to the full lecture?
noam chomsky: asking the right questions //
university of north carolina at chapel hill 1992 //
@@davidmateoricci3388 this guy is wrong it was saint lumberg univsetiy in fl 1994
41:12 I think John still doing the expecting on the second phrase.
Where do concepts reside?
1:50:29 I thought this was an interesting questions and I think it's probably true too. I got my thinking about the English word "Meow" which is the sound we hear a cat making versus "Nyan" which is how the Japanese hear it.
Very instructive for the linguistic student because you need the right questions or otherwise you are just wasting time or missing opportunities.
1:40:03 I was laughing with that guy. lol
next is the missing of water
Shalom
Wait, are people in this comment section actually arguing over a technical linguistics lecture? Lol no offense, I love Noam Chomsky.
46:48
IAU
George Carlin / Noam Chomsky dubble action for our satisfaction....
Bill Hicks is a better fit. If you want to pair.
1:43:24 chomsky on rule following again
In hiding me. Please. My Father
Man the question towards the end, around 1:50:00 is insane... typical behaviorist non-sensel
🙏🏻what’s the Un 🥲if’s there’s no international laws rights for the President order😭🙏🏻?
How’s much more for fakes on laws respect and control over the United family reasons for we uphold for destroying their rights on civilians living 🥲, and power screening for human beings living likely Palestinians without borders sovereignty with Israel invading please ? If’s no self conscious opinion consider with weapons justifying overseas us ?