Can’t believe I’ve owned this lens for a year now! Hope you enjoy my updated review on this lens and hopefully it’ll help you see if you need it. Thank you all for those who’ve watched all my videos on this lens! Appreciate you! ❤
😂😂😂 oh man haha well hopefully with holiday seasons coming up it’ll become available and you can get it despite her maybe not being too happy! I know Amazon tends to have it which I’ve linked it in my description!
Recently, I purchased this lens, almost one month, and I' m agree with you. This lens is excelent. In every way. Really like the lens. It's heavy but not like sigma lenses. I don't regret at all. Sharp and quality pictures. Beast of the lens. Happy anniversary 😎 and thanks for the review. I'm happy with my lens.
That’s awesome to hear! I’m glad you’re enjoying it! You’re definitely right, the weight isn’t anything compared to the sigmas honestly! Hope you keep enjoying your lens and appreciate you commenting and watching 😁❤️
As this boy wasn't available over here in Germany for a long time, I also own the Tamron 28-75 G2. First I thought, I will sell the 28-75 when I get my 35-150. But for a more lightweight and less intimidating setup, I'm still happy I own both.
That makes a lot of sense! Haha I still have my 28-75mm the first version since I got it for so cheap used there’s no point in getting rid of it for when I need something smaller on the gimbal!
To buy a7r5 with tamron 35-150 and 20mm 1.8, or a7iv with 24-70gm2 and 70-200gm2? I heard sony gm lenses have superior autofocus (xd linear motor) and rarely miss the focus, where 3rd party lenses aren’tthat reliable. What’s your experience with tamron autofocus where you have to be quick to focus and capture the shot and also in low light how it’s responding? Thanks! ❤
I haven’t had any issues with the Tamron lenses I own or have tested out! I’m sure the GM lenses have great autofocus but I don’t know if that much by the price difference haha I haven’t had any issues with mine when out shooting in daylight, lowlight or night time.
I've been debating for a while now on getting the megadap adapter that allows you to use Sony glass on the Nikon Z system and getting this for my Z7II for a more versatile studio lens instead of the F4 kit lens that way I can also use it for run and gun when I travel.
That would be awesome! I’m sure it would work pretty great with the adapter. Not sure if it makes the autofocus not be as perfect but it’s still better than not having the lens!
I am wondering if you have decided to get yourself the lens with the adapter. :) If so, would be great if you share with us your thoughts after using then on the Z system.
Just got this lense recently, the zoom ring is really stiff, which is quite annoying while shooting fast paced sports. Did yours get more loose overtime or not?
Mine doesn’t necessarily feel loose or stiff but just right. Not sure how fast you’d like to zoom in and how well to zoom in for you. But for me it’s worked great for sports.
Did you ever ran into weight-related problems when putting the cam with the 35-150 on a tripod for more than a few minutes? Seems a bit heavy for a lens without a tripod ring/mount.
@@criticaltinker it takes off a little edge of the digital feel of things to make the light more diffused as well so it isn’t too harsh! I usually use a 5%-10% to not make it too extreme
It seems like one of the best options for range + fast glass. I love the idea of one lens for 90% of my corporate and doc work. However, I wish the lens was bigger! And by that, I mean I wish it was the fully extended length and could zoom internally. No telescoping. Throw an aperture ring on it. Call it the pro version and increase the price by $500. I’d be first in line and and I think a bunch of other ENG, corporate and doc shooters would be as well.
It’s an amazing lens. Love mine still. Only way I’d replace it is if I get vibration compensation with it and maybe some internal zooming if it can do that! I like that idea.
Appreciate you watching!! And it’s not too bad! It’s not perfect but you can do a lot still! Most of my videos I do handheld when filming b-roll since I’ve gotten this lens unless I made a specific video about a gimbal and what not! For me it’s been fine honestly! The clips I do handheld usually I do in slow mo so it helps too!
Do you think it also can replace the GM 135 1.8… I could imagine that by this focal range the difference between 1.8 and 2.8 in regards to Bokeh is minimal?!? I just heard the the „weakness“ oft that Tamron is between 130-150 mm Greetings from Germany
I think you could replace it! I got rid of my 85mm 1.8 since I didn’t see too much difference from the bokeh between either that would make me want to not only stay with the 35-150mm. I haven’t had any weakness or issues with the 130-150mm range. I use it often when out shooting and haven’t had any problems myself!
Thank you! I think you’d love it for weddings! This is one I shot for my best friend’s wedding in Germany but you can see some video and photo examples! ruclips.net/video/nOD0t9F_USs/видео.html
Bought it 2 months ago, took it for one wedding one travel in Venise, and send back to repair 2 weeks ago. Sometimes the lens don't focus, nothing happen (5 times, and 4 times during one wedding, fortunately I didn't miss anything) and during my trip, one time the body couldn't change the aperture. To resolve that, i've to shut down/up the body and everything works fine, for the price it's not ok ! However this is a very very nice lens, sharp, focus is ok, have to test it more on sports picture, when it came back of repair. Yes it's heavy but, ok, you just pick one lens .
Oh wow! That’s crazy that happened. I wonder what the issue was since I haven’t had any of those issues at all. Maybe it was just a bad lens and they’ll just fix it or replace it well enough with a new one so you can enjoy it more! I’ve used it for my tennis academy a lot and it’s worked well too! I have a video about it on the channel too! It’s pretty cool to change focal lengths fast without missing a beat! Hopefully with the fix you’ll have no further issues and can enjoy it more!
@@EasyTigerCreative Yeah I'm still waiting the lens to come back from repair. Hope it will came back soon =) Was very pleasant to use it during the wedding, I've shot all the wedding with this only lens, and 35 mm was fine
I haven’t had any that I can see inside the lens. Only on the back but I can get them off with a dust blower I have! I also have had a cinebloom filter on it since I got it too haha so that might’ve helped.
@@EasyTigerCreative my friend has bought sigma 24-70 and it was extremely dusty inside after couple of weddings. With Fstops smaller than f8 dust was clearly visible in his photos. That's why I'm asking. This lens would be a huge investment for me, but in studio it would replace all primes I need. Thanks
@@mattstolzman yea sigma is known for that. One of the reasons I didn’t get one. I’ve been using Tamron lenses all around and they’ve been doing pretty great! I think you’d like this lens. It helped me replace all my primes honestly.
Love the lens and use it at all weddings most of the day. Ive had it for about a year and 4 months with no issues Only switch when it's time for dancing at the reception. The one thing I think they can improve is the coating for flaring. Not the best when light sources are coming straight at the lens.
That’s awesome! Glad to hear you’ve enjoyed the lens! Definitely love using mine all the time. Just helps me create more efficiently! And totally understand the flaring, I’ve just learned to use it to my advantage when needed or to avoid it when I can! Haha
As the lens that lives on my Sony full frame camera bodies (upgraded 3x) 99% of the time for all the regular event photography, I would definitely upgrade if the new version has IS/OSS/VC. This lens is one of the main reason why I switched to the Sony FF body and not Canon when I came back to full frame over 3 years ago. With the combination of FF + APS-C this lens provides an incredibly flexibilities that covers most of my needs. Tamron 35-150mm f/2.0-f/2.8 focal range combined with APS-C mode: @ f/2.0 Total available range: 35mm-58.5mm (FF range: 35mm-39mm + APS-C range: 52.5mm-58.5mm) @ f/2.2 Total available range: 40mm-88.5mm (FF range: 40mm-59mm + APS-C range: 60.0mm-88.5mm @ f/2.5 Total available range: 60mm-118.0mm (FF range: 60mm-79mm + APS-C range: 90.0mm-118.0mm) @ f/2.8 Total available range: 80mm-225.0mm (FF range: 80mm-150mm + APS-C range: 120.0mm-225.0mm) Love when I can just focus on creating and not swapping lenses during the shoot and cleaning the sensor after the shoot!
The updated version I’m sure will have some vibration compensation since they did that recently with their 70-180 new version that just came out that I tested.
t cant be possible to put OSS inside the lens, its already so big and with such an aperture theyd end to do a constant f2.8 to do a smaller lens and possibly OSS, but yeah i hope they either focus on smaller and lighter or working towards a constant f2
Generally, Optical image stabilisation (OIS) adds to the diameter, length & weight of the lens for the best performance. The compromise could be losing a Fstop of aperture to add OIS. I think OIS needs to capture slightly wider angle (FOV) at the front to then move internal lenses to adjust what hits the sensor at the back. The extra FOV, room for moving lenses, motors to move it, gyros & extra electronics all add to the size & weight. It's not something for free. Some older lenses had IS for th F4 version but the F2.8 version didn't. Canon added an RF 24-70mm F2.8 with IS for a similar size to previous EF 24-70mm F2.8 (non-IS) probably due to RF lenses can be slightly smaller due to the smaller back focal distance (mount to sensor distance) & newer lens/motor/control technology making room for adding extras. IBIS has some advantages but I don't think it can shift to the same amount as OIS. YMMV.
I haven’t noticed that on mine honestly! But I have heard some people complaining about sometimes getting like a rattle from their lens but then they get it sent for warranty and comes back fine.
Yup! That’s what I meant. Just meant the vibration compensation is what Tamron has, Sony has the OSS and such. Just said ibis in this video and didn’t have time to change basically that one word haha it’s life but appreciate you watching.
Yes I meant in body stabilization in the lens like the native Sony lenses. Some of them have like OSS or something like that haha but hopefully people understand what I mean.
@@EasyTigerCreative no. You said, and I quote, “lenses have it too”. No lenses have ibis. It’s not the same. Ibis moves the sensor around to achieve stabilization. Lenses do not do this. They do not have ibis.
@@justonbrazda3846 so please enlighten me to when I wrote, “some call it oss others other name.” My guy coming back to just fuel my algorithm. I appreciate that! I love the support so thank you 🥰😘❤️
I’m checking videos since I’m close to buyit,.. I’m just waiting what sigma will bring this week, Sar says it is a 70-200,.. but if they are intelligent enough it will be a 35-150 with ibis or maybe the unicorn 24-105 2.8… if they come out with another 70-200… well I get this… and use it until the G2 with ibis 😂
Yea I don’t know if sigma will dable into the 35-150 range since samyang did it but would be cool to see what they bring into the next line of lenses! It would be cool to get a cool 24-105 or to 135 range! But I’m sure Tamron will be working on their G2 version of the 35-150 eventually. Hopefully with some of the new vibration compensation!
@@TheAugusts definitely! It’s always tough when I have to decide if I want to not bring it when I’m trying to travel light because I know I can use my a7iv but the a7siii for video is just so smooth ahha
@@EasyTigerCreative I get mine in the mail later today. Too bad because I have a shoot this morning. Oh well, I am working a music festival in Santa Barbara next weekend so I’ll get o test it out then!
It doesn't have IBIS because IBIS = In Body Image Stabilization...for the camera body... Not the lens! Lenses have IS (image stabilization), OS (optical stabilization), OSS (optical steady shot), but not in body stabilization. But I digress. To answer the question, the reason why it doesn't have stabilization is because Tamron wanted to have the sharpest possible lens. Lens based image stabilization requires the lens to have floating elements which often result in less than perfect optical performance. This is the reason why most primes are not stabilized unless they are wildlife focal lengths where the advantages of stabilization outweigh the degradation in optical performance.
I know! Hopefully canon and Nikon will allow Tamron to make one for them! I know Fuji has a 17-70 that’s similar but still not the same form what I’ve seen with a lot of the specs of it even when translated from apsc to full frame
ive owned this lens for 5 months and used it only a couple times. Build quality is trash and the mounting bracket bent for me without ever dropping it and treating it like a baby. super disappointed with customer service as well wanting to charge me 400$ to fix something i didn't do, when i just spent 1900 after taxes to buy the damn thing. ill never buy another tamron again
Damn that’s wild! Never had any issues with them or their services. Maybe it was just an issue with that one and you can try to file it as a warranty. But I’d try to talk to someone above who you talked to see what they can do and explain that it’s a malfunction in the lens and see what they could do.
Can’t believe I’ve owned this lens for a year now! Hope you enjoy my updated review on this lens and hopefully it’ll help you see if you need it. Thank you all for those who’ve watched all my videos on this lens! Appreciate you! ❤
My wife is happy that every time I check on the status of this lens it is on backorder.
😂😂😂 oh man haha well hopefully with holiday seasons coming up it’ll become available and you can get it despite her maybe not being too happy! I know Amazon tends to have it which I’ve linked it in my description!
In stock now. BHphoto
@@pretor706 awesome!!! Glad to hear!
Buhahahahaha!
Recently, I purchased this lens, almost one month, and I' m agree with you. This lens is excelent. In every way. Really like the lens. It's heavy but not like sigma lenses. I don't regret at all. Sharp and quality pictures. Beast of the lens. Happy anniversary 😎 and thanks for the review. I'm happy with my lens.
That’s awesome to hear! I’m glad you’re enjoying it! You’re definitely right, the weight isn’t anything compared to the sigmas honestly! Hope you keep enjoying your lens and appreciate you commenting and watching 😁❤️
As this boy wasn't available over here in Germany for a long time, I also own the Tamron 28-75 G2. First I thought, I will sell the 28-75 when I get my 35-150. But for a more lightweight and less intimidating setup, I'm still happy I own both.
That makes a lot of sense! Haha I still have my 28-75mm the first version since I got it for so cheap used there’s no point in getting rid of it for when I need something smaller on the gimbal!
how were the lens flare issues? were there any specific conditions to avoid, or any techniques to minimize?
I know it can be a little much certain angles. I’ve used a diffusion filter on the lens and it’s been fine. I don’t mind it personally!
To buy a7r5 with tamron 35-150 and 20mm 1.8, or a7iv with 24-70gm2 and 70-200gm2? I heard sony gm lenses have superior autofocus (xd linear motor) and rarely miss the focus, where 3rd party lenses aren’tthat reliable. What’s your experience with tamron autofocus where you have to be quick to focus and capture the shot and also in low light how it’s responding? Thanks! ❤
I haven’t had any issues with the Tamron lenses I own or have tested out! I’m sure the GM lenses have great autofocus but I don’t know if that much by the price difference haha I haven’t had any issues with mine when out shooting in daylight, lowlight or night time.
@@EasyTigerCreative nice to hear! thank you!
IBIS is literally in camera body not lens but we get it 😅. OSS is the Lens stabilization or Tamrons own which is VC (Vibration Compensation) 🙂
Haha yea that’s what I meant. 😂 at least you got what I meant haha
@@EasyTigerCreative 😂 just teasing. Great video 👍 I have this lens myself and it’s my favorite
@@capturedbyfabian no worries haha and that’s awesome! What’s your favourite focal length on it?
I've been debating for a while now on getting the megadap adapter that allows you to use Sony glass on the Nikon Z system and getting this for my Z7II for a more versatile studio lens instead of the F4 kit lens that way I can also use it for run and gun when I travel.
That would be awesome! I’m sure it would work pretty great with the adapter. Not sure if it makes the autofocus not be as perfect but it’s still better than not having the lens!
I am wondering if you have decided to get yourself the lens with the adapter. :)
If so, would be great if you share with us your thoughts after using then on the Z system.
@@TransylvanianDream this lens came out for the Z system last month so there’s no longer a need for the adapter.
Just got this lense recently, the zoom ring is really stiff, which is quite annoying while shooting fast paced sports. Did yours get more loose overtime or not?
Mine doesn’t necessarily feel loose or stiff but just right. Not sure how fast you’d like to zoom in and how well to zoom in for you. But for me it’s worked great for sports.
Did you ever ran into weight-related problems when putting the cam with the 35-150 on a tripod for more than a few minutes? Seems a bit heavy for a lens without a tripod ring/mount.
Nope! No issues honestly. I’ve had it on there for doing talking head videos for a while and haven’t had any issues personally!
@@EasyTigerCreative Ok, thanks! 👌
how did you made that red ring?
That’s a cinebloom filter attached to the lens if that’s what you mean.
@@EasyTigerCreative oh interesting. what does that filter do? make the footages looks like film?
@@criticaltinker it takes off a little edge of the digital feel of things to make the light more diffused as well so it isn’t too harsh! I usually use a 5%-10% to not make it too extreme
It seems like one of the best options for range + fast glass. I love the idea of one lens for 90% of my corporate and doc work.
However, I wish the lens was bigger! And by that, I mean I wish it was the fully extended length and could zoom internally. No telescoping. Throw an aperture ring on it.
Call it the pro version and increase the price by $500. I’d be first in line and and I think a bunch of other ENG, corporate and doc shooters would be as well.
It’s an amazing lens. Love mine still. Only way I’d replace it is if I get vibration compensation with it and maybe some internal zooming if it can do that! I like that idea.
Watched so many of your videos about this lens. What's it like, with Active Stabilisation? Is it pretty stable handheld?
Appreciate you watching!! And it’s not too bad! It’s not perfect but you can do a lot still! Most of my videos I do handheld when filming b-roll since I’ve gotten this lens unless I made a specific video about a gimbal and what not! For me it’s been fine honestly! The clips I do handheld usually I do in slow mo so it helps too!
Do you think it also can replace the GM 135 1.8… I could imagine that by this focal range the difference between 1.8 and 2.8 in regards to Bokeh is minimal?!? I just heard the the „weakness“ oft that Tamron is between 130-150 mm
Greetings from Germany
I think you could replace it! I got rid of my 85mm 1.8 since I didn’t see too much difference from the bokeh between either that would make me want to not only stay with the 35-150mm. I haven’t had any weakness or issues with the 130-150mm range. I use it often when out shooting and haven’t had any problems myself!
Anyone know a similar option for canon rf?
I think canon came out with a 24-105 but not sure 🤷♂️ sadly canon hasn’t been allowing much of third party lenses.
Amazing review, mate. I mostly want it as a wedding and events lens when you don't wanna waste too much time changing lenses.
Thank you! I think you’d love it for weddings! This is one I shot for my best friend’s wedding in Germany but you can see some video and photo examples! ruclips.net/video/nOD0t9F_USs/видео.html
Bought it 2 months ago, took it for one wedding one travel in Venise, and send back to repair 2 weeks ago.
Sometimes the lens don't focus, nothing happen (5 times, and 4 times during one wedding, fortunately I didn't miss anything) and during my trip, one time the body couldn't change the aperture.
To resolve that, i've to shut down/up the body and everything works fine, for the price it's not ok !
However this is a very very nice lens, sharp, focus is ok, have to test it more on sports picture, when it came back of repair.
Yes it's heavy but, ok, you just pick one lens .
Oh wow! That’s crazy that happened. I wonder what the issue was since I haven’t had any of those issues at all. Maybe it was just a bad lens and they’ll just fix it or replace it well enough with a new one so you can enjoy it more! I’ve used it for my tennis academy a lot and it’s worked well too! I have a video about it on the channel too! It’s pretty cool to change focal lengths fast without missing a beat! Hopefully with the fix you’ll have no further issues and can enjoy it more!
@@EasyTigerCreative Yeah I'm still waiting the lens to come back from repair.
Hope it will came back soon =)
Was very pleasant to use it during the wedding, I've shot all the wedding with this only lens, and 35 mm was fine
@@Antonybec well I’m hoping it’ll arrive soon! 😁 and I used it for one wedding and went really smoothly honestly!
@@EasyTigerCreative huummm the shop call me, your bazooka is here 🤩🤩
@@Antonybec nice!!! 😂🤘
No dust specs inside the lens after a year?
I haven’t had any that I can see inside the lens. Only on the back but I can get them off with a dust blower I have! I also have had a cinebloom filter on it since I got it too haha so that might’ve helped.
@@EasyTigerCreative my friend has bought sigma 24-70 and it was extremely dusty inside after couple of weddings. With Fstops smaller than f8 dust was clearly visible in his photos. That's why I'm asking. This lens would be a huge investment for me, but in studio it would replace all primes I need. Thanks
@@mattstolzman yea sigma is known for that. One of the reasons I didn’t get one. I’ve been using Tamron lenses all around and they’ve been doing pretty great! I think you’d like this lens. It helped me replace all my primes honestly.
Love the lens and use it at all weddings most of the day. Ive had it for about a year and 4 months with no issues Only switch when it's time for dancing at the reception. The one thing I think they can improve is the coating for flaring. Not the best when light sources are coming straight at the lens.
That’s awesome! Glad to hear you’ve enjoyed the lens! Definitely love using mine all the time. Just helps me create more efficiently! And totally understand the flaring, I’ve just learned to use it to my advantage when needed or to avoid it when I can! Haha
As the lens that lives on my Sony full frame camera bodies (upgraded 3x) 99% of the time for all the regular event photography, I would definitely upgrade if the new version has IS/OSS/VC. This lens is one of the main reason why I switched to the Sony FF body and not Canon when I came back to full frame over 3 years ago. With the combination of FF + APS-C this lens provides an incredibly flexibilities that covers most of my needs.
Tamron 35-150mm f/2.0-f/2.8 focal range combined with APS-C mode:
@ f/2.0 Total available range: 35mm-58.5mm (FF range: 35mm-39mm + APS-C range: 52.5mm-58.5mm)
@ f/2.2 Total available range: 40mm-88.5mm (FF range: 40mm-59mm + APS-C range: 60.0mm-88.5mm
@ f/2.5 Total available range: 60mm-118.0mm (FF range: 60mm-79mm + APS-C range: 90.0mm-118.0mm)
@ f/2.8 Total available range: 80mm-225.0mm (FF range: 80mm-150mm + APS-C range: 120.0mm-225.0mm)
Love when I can just focus on creating and not swapping lenses during the shoot and cleaning the sensor after the shoot!
That’s awesome to hear! Definitely has been a solid lens to have! Really love how versatile it’s been for everyday photo and video!
I'm still not getting this lens (although I always wanting to have one) only because it has no ibis.
The updated version I’m sure will have some vibration compensation since they did that recently with their 70-180 new version that just came out that I tested.
t cant be possible to put OSS inside the lens, its already so big and with such an aperture theyd end to do a constant f2.8 to do a smaller lens and possibly OSS, but yeah i hope they either focus on smaller and lighter or working towards a constant f2
I’d be ok with a smaller and a f2.8 if it gave me some vibration compensation haha
Generally, Optical image stabilisation (OIS) adds to the diameter, length & weight of the lens for the best performance. The compromise could be losing a Fstop of aperture to add OIS.
I think OIS needs to capture slightly wider angle (FOV) at the front to then move internal lenses to adjust what hits the sensor at the back. The extra FOV, room for moving lenses, motors to move it, gyros & extra electronics all add to the size & weight. It's not something for free.
Some older lenses had IS for th F4 version but the F2.8 version didn't. Canon added an RF 24-70mm F2.8 with IS for a similar size to previous EF 24-70mm F2.8 (non-IS) probably due to RF lenses can be slightly smaller due to the smaller back focal distance (mount to sensor distance) & newer lens/motor/control technology making room for adding extras.
IBIS has some advantages but I don't think it can shift to the same amount as OIS.
YMMV.
Appreciate all the info! Truly helped me learn a lot so thank you for that! Just more wishful thinking on my end haha
I would absolutely take OIS if they made this a constant 2.8 to keep the size similar.
I got two of them and on both the aperture blades are asymmetrical. Has anybody noticed it?
I haven’t noticed that on mine honestly! But I have heard some people complaining about sometimes getting like a rattle from their lens but then they get it sent for warranty and comes back fine.
IBIS is the term for camera body, you don't call the image Stabilisation of the lens IBIS, ok?. Tamron call it VC (vibration control)
Yup! That’s what I meant. Just meant the vibration compensation is what Tamron has, Sony has the OSS and such. Just said ibis in this video and didn’t have time to change basically that one word haha it’s life but appreciate you watching.
He kept saying that he wished the lens have IBIS. I think he meant IS/VR/VC?
Yes I meant in body stabilization in the lens like the native Sony lenses. Some of them have like OSS or something like that haha but hopefully people understand what I mean.
ibis stands for "IN BODY" image stabilization. It is for camera bodies, not lenses.
Lenses have it too. Some call it OSS others other names. It’s in the lens. I just call it ibis as it’s more recognized.
@@EasyTigerCreative no lenses have ibis. Some camera bodies have ibis. Lenses have i.s, vr, ois, or oss. None of them have ibis.
@@justonbrazda3846 buddy literally what I just said 😂 but ok my guy! Sure! Good job! Go have a cookie and celebrate 🎉
@@EasyTigerCreative no. You said, and I quote, “lenses have it too”. No lenses have ibis. It’s not the same. Ibis moves the sensor around to achieve stabilization. Lenses do not do this. They do not have ibis.
@@justonbrazda3846 so please enlighten me to when I wrote, “some call it oss others other name.” My guy coming back to just fuel my algorithm. I appreciate that! I love the support so thank you 🥰😘❤️
it might become bigger if they'll add IS on that lens. Buy the A7RV for better IBIS.
True that! Eventually I might upgrade to that or maybe by then there will something better too!
Since I bought it, I've never used my Sony 50 f1.8 any more. 2 years down the line.
I feel you! That’s why I sold my prime lenses after getting it haha
I’m checking videos since I’m close to buyit,.. I’m just waiting what sigma will bring this week, Sar says it is a 70-200,.. but if they are intelligent enough it will be a 35-150 with ibis or maybe the unicorn 24-105 2.8… if they come out with another 70-200… well I get this… and use it until the G2 with ibis 😂
Yea I don’t know if sigma will dable into the 35-150 range since samyang did it but would be cool to see what they bring into the next line of lenses! It would be cool to get a cool 24-105 or to 135 range! But I’m sure Tamron will be working on their G2 version of the 35-150 eventually. Hopefully with some of the new vibration compensation!
Nice one again
Thank you!
This is my go to lens. Never take it off my FX3 👌Great vid man!
That’s awesome! Solid setup! I was wishing I had been able to get an fx3 since the form factor looks so good but love my a7siii honestly!
@@EasyTigerCreative yeah the a7s3 is amazing!
@@TheAugusts definitely! It’s always tough when I have to decide if I want to not bring it when I’m trying to travel light because I know I can use my a7iv but the a7siii for video is just so smooth ahha
@@EasyTigerCreative it’s true!
I'll take 35-150mm f/1.8 over IS. IBIS is for bodies, not lenses. I think you mean IS/OIS
Yea that’s what I meant haha but same!
@@EasyTigerCreative I get mine in the mail later today. Too bad because I have a shoot this morning. Oh well, I am working a music festival in Santa Barbara next weekend so I’ll get o test it out then!
@@charminbaer2323 ah man always sucks when that happens! Haha but at least you’ll get to have it soon to test out and enjoy it hopefully!😊
@@EasyTigerCreative actually doing a shoot today in Beverly Hills!
@@charminbaer2323 that’ll be awesome! Never been there but looks cool!
It doesn't have IBIS because IBIS = In Body Image Stabilization...for the camera body... Not the lens! Lenses have IS (image stabilization), OS (optical stabilization), OSS (optical steady shot), but not in body stabilization. But I digress. To answer the question, the reason why it doesn't have stabilization is because Tamron wanted to have the sharpest possible lens. Lens based image stabilization requires the lens to have floating elements which often result in less than perfect optical performance. This is the reason why most primes are not stabilized unless they are wildlife focal lengths where the advantages of stabilization outweigh the degradation in optical performance.
Appreciate the input!
not for apsc sensor, lol
You can use it for apsc cameras. It’ll just be more zoomed in.
It's such a beat of a lens
It really is!!
Too bad it's only for Sony :(
I know! Hopefully canon and Nikon will allow Tamron to make one for them! I know Fuji has a 17-70 that’s similar but still not the same form what I’ve seen with a lot of the specs of it even when translated from apsc to full frame
@@EasyTigerCreative Keeping my fingers crossed for Nikon version :D
@@photoreviewed-com I’ll be hoping there with you! You’d love it!
ive owned this lens for 5 months and used it only a couple times. Build quality is trash and the mounting bracket bent for me without ever dropping it and treating it like a baby. super disappointed with customer service as well wanting to charge me 400$ to fix something i didn't do, when i just spent 1900 after taxes to buy the damn thing. ill never buy another tamron again
Damn that’s wild! Never had any issues with them or their services. Maybe it was just an issue with that one and you can try to file it as a warranty. But I’d try to talk to someone above who you talked to see what they can do and explain that it’s a malfunction in the lens and see what they could do.
Best lens ever
Bla bla bla..
I can help you learn actual words too if you’d like!