How Royal Propaganda Protects The Queen
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 окт 2024
- Despite being unelected and privileged sponges of taxpayers money, the royal family still enjoy widespread support. On the Platinum Jubilee, we document the more than seven decades of propaganda that’s kept the queen on the throne.
_________________________________________________________
Support Novara Media for as little as £1 a month:
novaramedia.co...
Watch our fundraiser video and meet the Novara Media team:
• Why Mainstream Media C...
Fawning obsequious praise is just sickening for a Queen who paid 12 Million to silence victims of sex abuse. Shut the whole thing down. The mainstream medias blanket obsequious and default reverence is what keeps it in place especially constructs such as Having Royal Correspondents.
She was paid for her services or else what was she doing there in the first place bet he wasnt the first or the last an shes got a tongue in her mouth to utter the simple word no but she stayed there after i bet
@@mayevans7568 And what was Andrew doing there, getting himself involved with people like eptstein
@@fredatlas4396 we only know the tip of the iceberg what went on at Epstein’s parties and andrew was in the thick of it
@@mayevans7568 are you sick in the head or what?
She was a groomed, exploited child being sexually abused. Being paid and thinking it's ok just shows how mentally disturbed she was from the grooming.
You have just tried to give reason to the horrific act of sexually exploiting vulnerable, inexperienced easily hoodwinked young women by blaming them because they took money. A whole cadre of perverts exploited and warped their innocence for sick malevolent acts and then paid them to assuage their own guilt. And now here you are blaming the victims who's age, innocence and lack of experience made them easy targets.
Very accurate. Why won't the public see through this bias? What a right royal fiasco
I remember being in Central London as a 6 year old and a copper said to Mum that if we waited for a while the Queen would drive by. She was adamant that we waited for a chance to see Betty in the flesh. I remember catching a miniscule glimpse as a Rolls went past us at speed. I remember thinking "so what!"
My Mum still loves the Royal Family. I think it's an anachronistic, out of date and toxic family. Just look at how Andrew has dodged the law because of his wealth and position in society. Utter madness.
Paul what makes you think Andrew has dodged the law ? Do you really think you are being told the truth ?
@@annewalden3795
Why pay someone 12 million pounds to silence them Anne? If Andy was SO innocent then surely he would want to clear his name in a court room rather than have his reputation sullied?
By the way, I know someone who served with Prince Andrew and he wasn't known as 'Randy Andy' because it rhymed!
@@paulharrion3398 The amount of money paid is not known. Andrew settled the legal action on the advice of his lawyers and presumably was influenced by the fact that his mother's Jubilee was being celebrated at the time.
Those who seek to dispose them actually want to replace them.
@@maddumass If they are disposed no one will replace them. Not required.
My great auntie nessie was in the ATS during the war, there's a picture of the queen working on a land rover, what actually happened is my auntie and her pals was working on it were told to move as the queen appeared for a Propaganda photo shoot, and that's all it was, then she pissed off for tea, she was supposed to be in her team but was never there.
My auntie was invited to a garden party with the Queen when she was 90 ,probably to check up that they kept their mouths shut😅
Opras eyes are darker with make up. What sorcery is this ?
Ah the Windsors. The only immigrant family living off taxpayers money in the lap of luxury that can rely on unconditional support from the Daily Mail.
Immigrants and tax payers money? We need to get Brexit Nigel on this.
@@GBGOLC leave nigel where he belongs in the swamp.
Great comment David. "The House of Windsor as we know it today began in 1917 when the family changed its name from the German “Saxe-Coburg-Gotha.” If only the flag wavers knew, LOL 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
You do realise the Queen pays her taxes right?
@@DingleDangle66 Stealing a coin from one person's purse, paying taxes with that same coin and demanding a rebate for that same stolen coin doesn't count as paying any taxes
a nation of willing subjects who celebrate their servitude and get cross at anyone who questions their plight - a triumph of imperial dominance
Many people reject the monarchy and hope the nation wakes up and smells the coffee because its long long overdue
Nobody is "in servitude" to the Queen, though many willingly volunteer for an unnecessary grovelling attitude. Her actual servants seem to be willing enough. All heads of state cost quite a lot, and most of the fabulous "royal wealth" is inherited. I don't condone the whole caboodle, but i think it could - and will - be reformed and modernised when HMQ dies. Charles knows it, and William knows it even more. Many things could be done to reduce the wealth and privilege, and legal and taxation anomalies without drastically changing the Constitutional arrangements.
I wouldn't say the British are any more servile than anyone else. At least the Queen has no power. Watching Americans treat their Presidents like religious leaders, when these people do have actual power, is much scarier.
Not every person in the UK is a royalist. Most people don't want a monarchy or just don't care about them. 1-2 million people turning out for a jubilee is nothing when there are over 65 million people in the UK. As for the street parties... well, everyone loves a party.
@@monkeymox2544 The firm as the royal family are known have their fingers in all area's of their subjects life's
A red cabinet box is delivered weekly and her and her secretary scrutinise any legislation that they do not like and change it .
The queen was the signature who porogued parliament without which that illegal act would not have happen
US Americans believe the American identity is one that is separate from England, a rejection of it. What I find extremely fascinating when watching pro-democracy/anti-monarchy videos like this, from people in the UK, is that it really demonstrates how American culture is just a relatively minor mutation of the English one and has been so for centuries. Instead of monarchs, Americans advocate for their own subjugation by industrialists/billionaires. In spite of American religiosity, we have created a superior class of aristocrats within the US whose status is derived from essential/inherent (god-given) talents/intelligence, which is virtually identical to the religious rationale that was used and is still used by royalists within the UK to justify the existence of the monarchy (while the UK has a majority of non-religious people.) Murdoch's ability to corrupt US and UK politics through the same tricks of nationalist rhetoric seems to stem from what is, at the core of it, a shared imperialist identity that is easily threatened by any notion that it will, at some very near but unspecified point in time, stop being the same imperialist power it has always been.
We have all that as well. The guillotine does not discriminate in the way a person's class is ascribed or achieved. The guillotine prunes all whose identity is harmful to the survival of the unnamed masses. Viva la revolution.
A wise and thought provoking comment friend 👍
Trevor, what an insightful and accurate reply IMO.
The peoples of the world are more locked into echo chambers and manipulated than before. Education, circumspection and a little cynicism are what the electorate need.
Beautifully put.
Write a book on the topic. Really. You are good with words :)
A very elegant synopsis. But a few comments:-
The Queen is, by definition, apolitical, being only a constitutional monarch. Now I think that I would be extremely naive to believe that she has not, at times, exercised her considerable 'soft' power to influence events, but never overtly. (quite whether non-overt exercise of power is good or bad, well hmm). But non-overt exercise of power can be be a force for good if it deflects more extreme governmental action without disturbing matters general. And this has not just been in the UK, but all over the world, remember.
And I don't believe that I am subjugated by the Monarchy. But I do believe that I am subjugated by big business and the media. In this respect I think your comparison between the two fails.
Possibly America is going through the (not trauma) but radical adjustment that the UK went through when the Empire evaporated. America is going through the same, with the rise of China.
And of course, jackals and hyenas are waiting on the sidelines.
It's insane that so many 'ordinary' people support this nonsense even if all of this is funded with money from their pockets too.
A lot of the problem is the relentless propaganda that people are subjected to throughout their life. Just take a look at the current Jubilee and it's handling in schools. The monarchy and it's supporting establishment are well aware of the "get them while they're young" philosophy. Then there's the main stream media, foremost of these the BBC, probably the most dedicated Royal PR department possible.
75p per year
they know how to work on the sheep
@@jameshunt8373 it doesn't matter what it costs individually. Collectively it's an obscene amount of money that could be better spent elsewhere.
@@benmundin71 they're existence contributes 1.8 billion to the economy as of 2018. It costs the tax payer 87.5 million. I couldn't give a fuck either way, but if you want to be economical.
Poor Queen still alive and healthy at 95, had 4 physically healthy children, lived a life of such entitlement, luxury, pampered, travelled the world, living in palaces with her own organic fruits, vegetables, herbs and even bee hives, trees, flowers, gardens you could land a helicopter in, imported the best of the best > cheeses, wines, champagnes,
cognacs, truffles, marmalades from the world, fresh meats, shooting sprees, horses to ride, carriages to sit in, cashmere and silk to wear, chefs to prepare her favourite meals, lady in waiting bringing her morning tea, run her bath, someone to dress her and
design all her hats, gloves, lingerie, cloths and shoes for her, jewellery we will never touch, Clarins in Paris even create her own special unique pink lipstick. The poor Queen had a husband beside and behind her
for 70 odd years, one who lived till almost 100 yrs of age. They shared a summer castle, a winter castle, autumn and spring castles. The private jet or the ship ? Yes the poor Queen, she never knew what it feels like to be left by a husband or lose a child to
cancer, or bring children up alone struggling to put a pie on the table. Pay taxes, pay a speeding fine, clean a house, sew a button, sit in a waiting room for a doctor to see you, I could go on and on and on and on.
And people feel sympathy for her.
Quite right…
She's 96.
very well said
This is a fine description Steve except you missed out the lackey whom does her Farts on her behalf - unless she does the necessary push and a servant with nose of the finest order discreetly places the Golden Henry Hoovers’ nozzle at her backside following a Regal Release…. 🏴❤️
Essentially Britain's highest paid beneficiaries.
There is no reason for monarchy anymore, not just in England but all over the world.
@@donaldellis3609 monarchy and corporatism are not the only two choices. And you say "Johnsons" as if it's a counterexample when it's actually an example. Bit of an own goal for your argument there huh.
@@donaldellis3609 Wake up to what? The two you mentioned were voted into power by people who are kept ignorant and misguided enough to vote against their own interests. The future is not predetermined - change could start with you waking up and educating yourself.
I hope that Australia will soon become a republic.
Don't go all 'Frenchie' on us now. We need Royal Turds around to have something juicy to gossip about.
@@tracesprite6078 not till the boomer generation are no longer with us
It’s about time the British people open their eyes .
Their government never come clean to them about what they did to their own neighbor the Irishmen, much less what they did and are doing to the rest of former colonies. It will take more than just eye-opening dialogues.
I agree with you 💯
Absolutely
Too busy buying commemorative teatowels.
Absolutely. This “jubilee celebration” is a nightmare that I wish was over.
No more paying for this extremely wealthy familys life style . Australia should become independent. Australian republic
when Charlie was born his mother handed him off to a Royal nanny /wet-nurse and buggered off on the Royal yacht Britannia for months, touring the empire. no wonder he is dysfunctional, this has always been the way Royal motherhood was done, her duty was to provide an heir to carry on the dynasty, bringing up the child was some other flunkies responsibility.
Remember how he formally shook her hand on her return?
She wasn't a single mother with sole responsibility - equal responsibility for how dysfunctional he is should also go to his cheating, racist of a father.
I was asked over this Jubilee weekend why I wasn’t a monarchist I answered .I have always found myself unable to venerate any person solely by reason of birth and that tonight many in this county of ours both young and old will go to bed cold and hungry.The Monarchy perpetuate a class system that should be abhorrent to all mankind.
It’s not the monarchy who perpetuate anything, it’s the society in which they, and we exist, which perpetuates it. And that’s the reason the monarchy will endure. A majority of people in British society want to keep the monarchy and therefore it stays.
Naysayers such as yourself would do well to ignore the monarchy and focus your attention on achievable goals to help the cold and hungry.
@@graemecreegan6749 what like getting rid of the root cause, our tory government since 2010. And how do you really know how many people here in the UK actually support the Royals. The royals could stay where they are, but our governments just stop giving them millions of pounds of our money every year
@@fredatlas4396 if a majority did not support the monarchy a labour government would have done away with it.
A change of government may well be more achievable. However I doubt it would make much difference as both major parties are virtually indistinguishable.
Well said.
@@graemecreegan6749 As long as Monachey exists there is a class system and they are without doubt the head of it. Whether people want it or not is not the issue.
I was always a Republican. The queen reinforces the class system and inherited wealth.
Er, "republican", surely? I'm not sure you're class analysis will make you popular among Republicans.
But Pirce Morgan doesn't like anyone talking bad about hes beloved queen. He'll walk for his hard working job in protest.
It's a cult
It is possible to escape this mind-prison. I used to be a monarchist, but the more I learned of history and political theory the more revolted I became with the notion. Robespierre had the correct idea.
As a portuguese, I want to say that, once you get rid of them, its stupid to bring the monarchy back, but if you still have them, you should keep them.
When the republicans killed king Carlos in 1908, and the monarchy ended in 1910, we had 16 years of one of the most unstable regimes in history (45 governments in 16 years, wich is more prime ministers in 16 years than kings in 800 years, for you to see, one government get us in the WWI, the next was pro german and abandoned the soldiers in the front), then we had 5 years of military dictatorship, and then Estado Novo was established, the longest fascist dictatorship. Then we had half an year of comunism, that was also removed by another military cue to avoid becoming a comunist dictatorship. Then we had 5-10 years of social instability, party sponsored terrorism, famin in the south, etc...
I cant even think in bringing our monarchy back. Its so stupid of an idea that the monarchist party got 220 votes last national election. But if I could turn back time, I would be in that square shouting that someone is going to shot the king.
The monarchy is stability, and is associated with national culture. They dont hold any real power, but more like pieces of "national furniture".
The british and spanish royal families are particulary toxic (they are next door, so any news from Philip VI, the king emeritus and the princesses make their ways into our tabloids very easily, and they are prety toxic to), but you can see how the royal family of Belgium is the only thing keeping the country together, and the examples of the netherlands, danemark and the scandinavian monarchies.
@@Duck-wc9de that may have been the case in Portugal, but I disgree that "monarchy = stability." That seems like you are severely limiting your own political possibilities. Also NM has frequently debunked the talking point of "they hold no real power therefore it is fine and we should not mind their continued maintenance of their title." Also I don't have much time for maintaining some outmoded notion of "national culture" with roots in the subjugation of colonies and rigid class hierarchy. Societies and cultures can and should change for the better.
@@bengallup9321 Republics are corrupt.
@@Duck-wc9de you don't have to have a monarch to have a stable country lol
@@Duck-wc9de Keeping them is an utter disgrace. They stand for nothing other than inequality. Inequality is the biggest contributing factor to suffering and depression. The reason the media work so hard to convince the masses that having a monarchy is somehow a privilege is because they want society divided by abhorrent class systems that support the idea that an unfair society is something to cherish. As soon as you try making things fairer, the powers that be and their rich lobbying friends are in the firing line.
The truth. The monarchy must be abolished!
"Unbearable duty?" Everything they do looks perfectly bearable to me. Sign me up!
Sad but a fact, there will be some in the U.K. watching jubilee celebrations cheering on the Queen while sitting in a cold home, with very little food in their belly.
so true
"with very little food in their belly" oh give me a break, that's such a cringe statement.
@@DingleDangle66 its true.
@@DingleDangle66 or the elderly lady who cannot afford to heat her house and resorts to riding on buses all day to keep warm.
@@DingleDangle66 or the parents 'wringing their hands wondering how to feed their children.' You may think these are cringey statements but sadly all true.
To be fair, her ancestors DID have the biggest and nastiest mafia gang in the past and ours didn't....
@@meh3247 no it was still there even after 1381
@@meh3247 That was no the peasantry hope you're aware?
That was the gentleman cohort of the New Model Army's Officer Corps.
No peasantry, anywhere, in the history of humanity has ever abolished a monarchy, only the bourgeoisie or administrative class (officers, priests, businessmen, etc) ever have.
From the very first revolution (the Roman one) to the socialist revolutions of the 20th century in Russia and Chinna (led by the academic elite and officer corp)
@@BasicLib someone has read their theory 😂
@@SumErgoCogito10 I’m actually probably not a socialist, definitely not a marxists
But Yh, I’ve read enough of Marx to understand historical materialism and the goals of the socialist project when you return to fundamentals and so I can treat it with a great deal of respect and understanding while significantly disagreeing with many of its core conceits.
It makes me so happy to see the people of the English speaking Caribbean wanting true independence from our former colonial masters.
No. Barbados is the only 1 that has become a republic in the last few years. Antigua/Barbuda, St Lucia, St Kitts and Nevis, Jamaica and the Bahamas, may become republics in the near future but not yet. This story is mostly rumour at the movment.
@@richardhussey7641 it's going to happen. Deal with it
@@benmundin71 That is far from certain!
@@richardhussey7641 Rumours you say? The PM of Jamaica announced during the recent visit by family of the British Queen that the Jamaican government has started the process to make the island a republic. And there are many people in The Bahamas who have friends and relatives living in the Turks and Caicos Islands and still remember the Michael Missick situation.
These isles are scared with the inadequacy of “government”. We have people starving and having to decide between eating or heating. The monarchy is rotting and should be shed from the support they receive from the nation. Here is a thought give half your wealth to the people that so clearly still support you, denounce the senseless government, and live on the same style of benefit many have to endure. I’m ashamed to be British if we cannot feed and protect our children - surely we’re more than this?
This British monarchy costs at most 2 billion pounds a year. We spend more than that every week just on the NHS. This channel is lying too you, about how much would be saved!
@@richardhussey7641 lol. The NHS is one of the largest parts of our economy. You have fallen for the propaganda 😛
@Carrot Cruncher Oh wow? What a great speech! Insane!
@@pseudonayme7717 On the country. You have fallen for the propaganda! It will not make much differance. And that is before, you factor in how much the monarchy brings in too Britain in tourism revenue. A lot more than it coasts!
@@richardhussey7641 where does that wealth go? I’m not sure it goes to help dear old Ethel in Lancashire struggling to afford to eat? I’m not trying to be provocative, a genuine fact based answer would be enlightening.
I think it is disgusting that we are celebrating this woman's birthday and spending millions(or is it billions?) of pounds of public tax payers monies at a time when there is a major cost of living crisis going on where people are choosing to heat or eat and when some can't even afford to buy food and have to visit a food bank to get by.
I think the bubble will burst once the queen who incidentally hasn't done anything for the people she professes to serve passes away. She chooses to miss the state opening of parliament because she was supposed to be too sick yet a couple of days later she is opening a new Tube line and is at the horse races. She shows more emotion towards her horses and dogs than she does the people. Remember, this woman had to dragged kicking and screaming down to London after the death of Diana who only did so after the people dared to ask the question where was she and talk about becoming a republic started in the news media.
YES WE HAVE BEEN HAD BIG TIME.
When her son takes over it is done
I question this the other week why at a time when there is a cost of living crisis are people are celebrating wealth
@@paulhynes170 Americans have got the myth of "pulling yourself by your own bootstraps" and self made billionaires-entrepreneurs . UK population has been indoctrinated for ages now, that all their wealth is somewhat a derivative of the monarchy they live under. In both cases it's a form of totemic religion that promises attaining same qualities (in this case immense wealth) as the object of their worship.
im self employed and forced to have a holiday with no pay.......Bravo to the queen
How much do the royals cost? How much money do they send to the caimans or other tax havens? From a European perspective this looks really anachronic and unjustified considering their cost to the British people. This monarchy has to end
Eeeh, half of Western European countries are monarchies, we really have no leg to stand on this one...
@@nicksmith4730 They're tiny, but don't forget Monaco, Liechtenstein, Andorra (half a year) and the Vatican (absolute elective monarchy).
@@vincentblack7467 £1.29 per person. And what The Firm generate in tourism for the economy is billions.
@c g rubbish, people would come regardless of them. Look at Versailles. In fact, it would probably be easier to get to see Buckingham Palace if they weren't there.
It’s time she serves zero purpose and the whole concept of birth right royalty in a modern Democratic age just doesn’t make much sense. I know people who actually believe she is a super hard worker…somehow writing letters and signing documents is considered work
You mean like a lot of civil servants working from home do you ?
Oh ok then a secretery doesn,t work
@@michaelmather7352 Well thats what you said not I. Remember, signing letters etc is not work, you said it.
@@michaelmather7352 Secretaries are paid pittance in comparison. it's not a job that deserves such ridiculous privileges, is it.
Oi! Wot about all the smiling 'n' shakin hands? And gettin in an out of carraiges? An' briefly luggin stuff about the public have given you?
The Royal family is a symbol of a time long passed.
Finally a touch of sanity as I’m going mad by watching all the fawning on British television!
hear hear !!!
@@meh3247 thanks dear 🙂
May I also recommend the wonderful
Christopher Hitchens,
The Monarchy: A Critique of Britain's Favourite Fetish
Especially that creepy brown nosed Nicholas witchell
@@jamsheadaziz3999 brother you read my mind! He is the worst of the lot! Apart from hanging outside Buckingham palace 24/7 like a creep …He probably has never even met the queen!!!😂😂😂
Hopefully once Charles is on the throne some of the shine will come off the crown.
Oh it will
Pure properganda.... costs excessive .. sickening
yeah sack the lot i say, the only time I respected them was through Diana she really worked hard and was the only one worth it, now just get rid of the lot
As an Australian (now living in the UK), I had the privilege of voting for Australia to become a republic. It was a bitter disappointment that that vote did not win the day and Australia is still subject to such perverse system of rule. I hope one day to vote for a republic in the UK as well. Thank you for such an excellent presentation.
Australia rules itself, the Queen is just a figurehead.
Indeed, but never underestimate the significance of what it says about a country by the figurehead it chooses to have. I know it's not often, but Australia still has to fund the "privilege" of any royal visits out of their own treasury.
@@philipaveray3770 Agreed.
Australia's new gov't has appointed a Minister for the Republic - hopefully 2nd time will be successful :)
just lets get rid of the monarchy and politicians we are adults we can govern ourselves and i am pretty sure we wont rob oursleves or take our soldiers to stupid wars thats about others resources and getting money from supplying arms its time for change time for the whole world to say oy get out we do not consent and then send all the guilty like tony blair etc to jail for a long time all public commodoties that were sold against our wishes should be seen and stolen property the buyers should be jailed for recieving stolen commodoties and the lot returned to the people
After a day or two of avoiding the nauseating, sacchariny, royalfest thank you for taking the time to critique this feudal anachronism that is the unearned privilege. What I'd like to know is when will the masses wake up and ditch this medieval pantomime?
Never. You will be crying over this for your whole life
Never in a million years. Stockholm syndrome has played it's part.
I love doug stanhope take down of the royal family
I'd say they'll wake up a couple of minutes before Armageddon.
Also, the latest is Prince William selling the Big Issue on the street. Firstly what a joke, secondly how insulting to people who are struggling. Then he gets in his chauffeur driven Rolls and goes back to his great big house, and is waited on hand and foot. No worries about mortgage payments, food bills, heating bills, fuel bills etc. I was going to say, do they think we are stupid, but unfortunately I think a lot of people love all this and fall for it every time. Still, we can all sleep soundly in our beds knowing that William went out to sell the big issue (photo op) and of course ‘he is one of us’ 🤣
Don't wish them harm just wish them gone. What sort of example does unearned privilege set ?
Name me one potential candidate for first UK President. No, really...
Caroline Lucas? Davis Attenborough? Plenty of honest hard-working people outside of our useless government
@@kumasenlac5504 None of the Royal family would make the ballot paper.
@@kumasenlac5504 Markus Rashford
They should be exiled to the US.
In 1947 the Queen spoke from Cape Town in such glowing words about South Africa and Rhodesia and the commonwealth. Fast forward to the 1960s and both were kicked out of the commonwealth and in the case of Rhodesia the Queen was supporting the very people who were killing and committing unspeakable attacks very often on their own people. Robert Mugabe was the leader of one of these factions and he was rewarded with a knighthood.
Strangely England is stuck with it. One unelected person head of the church the military and the people. Scotland on the other hand still retains its own Crown as written into The act of Union 1707. A fact that Westminster, almost all politicians and the media chose to ignore, the same way that they have treated other annexed countries. Scotland's sovereignty lies with the people and a King or Queen are subject to the will of the people. This is why no English monarch has been crowned in Scotland since Queen Anne. To do so the Coronation Oath of Scotland must be taken which reduces them to the leader of equals and can be sacked by the will of the people. We wouldn't want the English to get that idea would we?
It's amazing that a nation would celebrate someone on social welfare for 70 years.
👍🤣😅😆🤣
Very good. I agreed before watching, and agree even more now!
"How are you celebrating?"
"Eating meals that are from a food bank"
Have a nice evening.
And in fear of the next gas and electricity bill but they still hump the flag
When she goes then it is time to push hard, keep our powder dry until then, its pointless to push now, Charles is a weakness we can take advantage of.
Are you feeling OK?
@@tiny19892 Spiffing, how about you old chap?
Careful lads, ye'll end up in the Tower
@Korsalath not to mention that bringing up the ghost of Diana can really get people to turn against him. It's not the most rational reason for deciding for or against a political system, but humans are not particularly rational.
I do sort of feel a little bad but i really do think it's time England moved on without them,it doesn't make sense to most of us these days to keep a family with such a horrible history behind them, maybe they could move to America they the fairytale nonsense and they have plenty of money
We should take some lessons from the French and Bolshies about how to deal with the Aristocracy
Absolutely 👍 oh'.. love it the French style 🤣
You mean remove aristocracy and install another new totalitarian aristocracy? 😂 Human behaviour to subconsciously construct top down power structures to hold control over new political paradigms. If you're advocating for the removal of the current pseudo state level power structure to replace it with an absolute structure of totalitarian rule then a 'Bolshevik' and 'French' uprising would be apt.
Where could we get a guillotine? I bet France still has theirs
I mean the French at the time didn't really understand economic theory and how the nobles controlled the food, not the king. And then they replaced positions of power with people that were 10x more tyrannical than the king ever was.
Do I even need to explain what the Bolsheviks did wrong? Replacing a functioning power structure with their joke of a government?
Fortunately, The British have nothing to lose here except their nostalgia.
Guess you needed to know about the post revolutionary guillotine period to get the knitting comment.
Superb presentation. Always thrilling to hear the truth -- especially when so many put so much effort into covering it up.
Its the greed of the govenment an the business men that run the country that mess it up the rich are the ones are the con artists we payed taxes to the monarchy for their up keep an our defense our country if you dont like it you can always leave this place an no one will stop you
i turned down the chance to meet prince charles in the 80s when working at blist hill museum rolling mill site, they dragged off all the old beaten up machinery, cspent days cleaning up the site had brand new jcb`s dragged onto the site so as not to offend his eyes i supose, all the old beaten up machinery was brought back the next day and we wonder why they are so out of touch
Her name isn't Windsor. It's a fake name.
Now, now. We don't want to encourage xenophobia against our German overlords, do we?
Yep. She's German. The name change was to make them more acceptable in England.
Sachs-Coburg Gotha is their real surname!!
Half Scottish
I absolutely don't agree with the monarchy as it is. As much as Harry is privileged, people seen to forget he actually said that he would continue to carry out his royal duties but didn't wish to be paid by the Royal Estate. I expect this horrified the 'working royals.' I find it frustrating that this has been forgotten.
Saw the Jubilee procession - All I saw was militarism, rifles, uniforms, cannons. It was ridiculously out of step with 2022.
I'm a believer in abolishing the Monarchy once the queen abdicates or dies.
It's obscene to keep this system in place to shower both power and wealth upon an unelected few.
Keep all the trappings as show pieces and museums for the tourists .
What power?
I reckon her son won’t garner the same mystique and unquestioned respect or awe because as she says “ continuity is important “ and when she dies , a new face will not be “ continuity “ . And any rational citizen isn’t surely going to toady up to her 30 something grandson and his stuck up missus . Oh - here they are now…..Great Work . I will ensure my 14 yr old great niece of intellect sees this before it’s too late. 😮
We are never going to get beyond capitalism, if we are still holding on to feudalism.
Holy crap they are so cringe.
@Old Skool Bodybuilding Routines It's not and it's set to take us with it.
@Old Skool Bodybuilding Routines Things that know they are dying are most dangerous. In some ways it has never been stronger. We are deep in an ever more cliched capitalist dystopia. We have to kill it, because as i say, if we don't it will die only as a side effect of it killing the planet.
@Old Skool Bodybuilding Routines Don't get me wrong, change could be coming, but i see a lot of apathy and a lot of holding on to the damaging patterns. All part of change i guess. But scientifically, we can't say if what is happening won't be as bad, or worse than a comet, a super volcano or an algae bloom. None of those have changed the structural and chemical processes in just this way. It could do for life permanently, or at least for the same few million years as the others. Difference is, and the bit we definitely agree on i reckon, is the volitional aspect of this extinction event. Well, more that we have to learn to *actually* choose our behaviour, and not have cultural conditioning and biological drives choose for us.
Short version, i'd be more with your perspective if more people weren't putting up with this crap at this very late stage.
It's utter madness that poor people are cheering the Royals
The Queen has a personal wealth of £500 million and the family vwealth is £74 billion !!!!!
We have thousands in utter poverty
No one knows the real value of the British Monarchy. They have land, money and assets all over the world. Come to think about it, what does Britain really have in terms of natural resources - everything has been stolen from others through all kinds of methods - none of hem honourable.
Everything you are saying is so right we don't mean nothing to them and there don't mean nothing to me these four days are all fake no bank holiday for me I have had to work like in the real world
The real problem is that people simply do not want to know the truth and wouldn't believe it in any case. When I say I believe the monarchy should be ended, right now, people look at me as if I'm completely mad. They just trot out the same old arguments about how it would be so much worse with an elected Head of State. I think, even with Charles as the next monarch , they will carry on in the same old way.
i am British and the first to admit that the British people are absolutely crap at picking elected representatives you have only got to look at the corrupt government in power at the moment, Boris and his cronies, Brexit…For gods sake don’t give them anything else to vote like an elected head of state no telling what we would end up with!!!! Happy Jubilee everyone.x
Well the problem you have is expecting anyone else with their own mind to fall into line with anything you believe. The trick is to convince them to come around to your point of view with a compelling argument. But that requires thought not belief, so you might struggle.
@@vincentblack7467 illegal immigration costs the country more than the monarchy, let’s deal with the biggest problems first
what an amazing video you put together. I couldn't have put it better myself, you said everything spot on. The sneaky way they try to get support for royalty, through the media also is so annoying.
THE BRITISH MEDIA AND THE ROYAL FAMILY ARE IN EACH OTHER POCKET
ALWAYS HAS BEEN. IN THE MONTHS COMINGS FORWARD REGULAR PEOPLE WILL BE SUFFERING AND THE ROYAL FAMILY WILL BE LIVING A LIFE OF ENJOYMENT. You poor people their really making a fool of you all .
Very well thought take on the hypocrisy of the monarchy
I watched this after receiving an email from someone I don't remember ever knowing (I was apparently at school with him 55 years ago) asking me to remove them from my contact list, after I posted an image of the red/black flag and a suggestion that Elizabeth the Last would be worth celebrating.
Thank you for an excellent presentation - although I'm sure we all knew it all before.
It is salt in the wounds for all those struggling right now at home and no thought for those who are being brutally murdered in ukraine. Make me sick to the core. The windsors truly are the benefit scroungers. Disgusting.
The post box at the end of our road has GR on it. It is over 100 years old and from a time when all of Ireland had a king. It's impossible to imagine having a royal family now. Greetings from Ireland (republic).
This is an excellent channel - and this has to be one of their best productions. Brilliant.
On the Throne for 70 yeats? That must have been a frustrating movement.
The last time I had a Netflix subscription I binged watched The Crown. If that series is anywhere near accurate members of the Royal Family don't even dress themselves. They have servants to do that for them. And if news paper rumours are true Prince Charles has a servant to wipe his backside after having a number 2 and another servant puts toothpaste on his toothbrush when Charles cleans his teeth. Whether he actually brushes his teeth himself or has a servant do even that I don't know but these people are bloody lazy to the nth degree. Can you imagine what people would say if you or I were that lazy? Royals get away with it though.
The only thing I took away from that series was how disgusting they treated poor Diana. She was the only one of them with an ounce of integrity and they chewed her up, spat her out, and murdered her
Poor people are called "lazy", while rich people are "hard working".
Do you really believe that nonsense? I would TEN times rather have the king than a president like that awful man Trump, paid vast amounts of money to ruin his country.
That's 70 years on the scrunge. About time she and her family payed income tax, inheritance tax and got a proper job.
The Queen and her family all pay income tax voluntarily.
They do not have to but they chose to do so.
@@perfectstorm7379
Only just started in 1993. What about the years before? What about inheritance tax? What about all the free stuff they receive that anybody else would have to pay for out of taxed income?
As for the them volunteering to pay income tax it was to appease the public as to prolong the Royals existence.
@@kb9072 1993 is correct, but at least they pay tax. The free “ stuff “ is only like the company car driver. The car is free and the driver pays tax on it, same applys with gifts in kind which are declared on the accounts of the royal family. As for appeasing the public, well if that point is true it would mean that they care what the public thinks and wants of them. I am at the older end of the life scale so it means little to me if they stay or go, however, an elected head of state is how some dictatorships started.
Best we bare that in mind.
@@perfectstorm7379
Scroungers the lot of them. Not a days hard work In their entire life. The entire family have basically been on accelerated and enhanced benifits for over 70 years.
The flights, cars, hotels, clothes, jewellery, holidays that Andrew and Ferguson had during their marriage would amount to a vast fortune. What benifits did the country get from them?
She was caught trying to sell her influence. Scandal after Scandal. I just don't see because of who's womb he came out of why I've got to pay taxes towards keeping him in luxury.
@@kb9072 A fair argument.
A very good summary although I do think it's also unfair to be born into a job, no matter how privileged. All in all the monarchy must go!
And what would they do exactly? I don't see any of them having any discernable skills/talents.....
@@daveroche6522 jobcentre it is then. Have they thought of getting a job in cyber?
@@ianmendham6671 QEII - "What on EARTH is a cyber?,
All the others "I say - what on EARTH is a job?".
Amen ! Someone speaking out about this toxic institution. Obscene waste of money.
I have to disagree with you about how the members of the royal family are not to be pitied. The reason we are disgusted with so many of them as people is because they have been raised in absurd circumstances. They have never had the chance to be normal. It's just one more reason to abolish the ridiculous institution.
Thank you for telling a story more people should have to consider. In 2022, there is no. reason this extended family should receive government funding. Going to events and waiving does not cover what they receive in largesse.
rremember an old pathe propaganda about lizzy training to be an ambulance driver"and now its been changed to auto mechanic ha ha ! some of the londoners said she be home to coal fires and no rationing after a few hours! 1940! SAOR ALBA
the monarchy is the very lynchpin of privilege in this country and therefore they have to go
I AM glad Harry and Meghan leave this circus .what a waiste of money. As an American i wil not cursti OR bauw for no oder uman.i pray to God my lord.🙏
Can't remember how many times I've heard that the British monarchy is the envy of the world! Utter bullshit and propaganda as you state. Once saw a documentary of the Queen Mother visiting bombed homeless people in east London. She stepped out of her Rolls in her furs and pearls, shook some hands for about 10 min and left to go back to the comfort of the Palace. The comment from one of the women there - "How wonderful for her to come. She's one of us ain't she?
More like this! love you love your work!
Brits can’t afford a monarchy - nobody can….too anachronistic!
Also, too anti-human!
Anti nature for sure!
The Crown Estates pays for them, might be worth looking it up. Also who pays for Airforce 1?
If the queen really cares for her citizens why does she not fore go her salary and give it to the people in this cost of living crisis! Lets face even if she gave her salary for the 10 years it would not make any difference to her life style!!
The whole thing will fizzle out once liz has passed. People have a lot of sympathy for a little old lady but the tone changes when it’s a bloke (especially as Charles and William are hardly popular)
"The Queen celebrates 70 years on the throne," sounds like a great line for a laxative ad.
You are wicked, haha.
@@vincentblack7467 , throne = wc =toilet = lavatory = loo .
Just imagine if a laxative company actually used that for their advertising. There'd be mass complaints about how "tasteless" it is.
It would be a terrible line for a laxative ad, it would imply it was extremely ineffective.
Thank you so much for this. The only voice of reason that l've heard. I am 77 and l witnessed so much of what you show here. I am proud to say l have been a republican now for 60 years - although l didn't know that was what it was called. I only knew my belief was founded on the monstrous injustice of royalty's very existence - and it still is.
Good on you Pollie, me too, but I am afraid we are in the minority.
@@jeanettesteed3326 more are waking up, and when the Queen passes, things will change.
When the Queen passes it would be an excellent opportunity to end the status of the Royals, end the Monarchy and completely separate Church and state. However that will not happen as those in power, with power want to continue the anachronism that is the Monarchy along with the connotations that brings.
I have emoney on the former colonies that still have her as HoS will bin the idea and move on when she goes. The UK should do the same.
Then we have to change the whole system of government
Michael Walker is brilliant. He delivers his words in such a candid yet powerful manner. Novara’s standard of production seems to be getting better and better. So much work goes into this channel I implore anybody reading this to donate to the cause.
Not to put on my tinfoil hat to firmly, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the powers that be start to demonetise and/or shadow ban Novara videos.
Keep up the great work
@Annabel Jones the powers that be haven't always been good judges of what's dangerous to them. There are many examples of people banning stuff they didn't need to ban out of an inflated fear, and you just got done watching a video about how keen the royals are on propaganda. They kept a lovingly-made fluff-piece locked away from viewership for decades because it made them look too down-to-earth. Do you see these people as the best judges of threat? The same people including a guy who had to stumble over outwardly not regretting his Epstein friendship. That bunch of people. It'd be a long bet (hence the OP's "not to put on my tinfoil hat too firmly" qualifier) but it's certainly not outside the realm of plausibility is it.
@Annabel Jones I'm pretty certain that some of their journalists have already faced this type of thing on Twitter.
@Annabel Jones - Well ... telling the truth tends to upset the entire system. It is often a bit much for some that support it, the old reactionaries don't like it very much - threats are posed [or imagined] so they try to hang on, right through to the very bitter END!
@Annabel Jones - Unlike the case in point, I am not faith based in what I find to be relevant, believable - Novara Media is largely where I go to find it ['because I DO CARE}.
You’re right. The standard is superb and the contributors too.
Novara is the real national treasure.
".... the Queens subjects..." - those 3 words make me retch.
I am really happy that there are some British people that feel like others billions of people around the world, Bravo
I think it's considerably more than "some" despite some of the supposed polls mentioned in this video!
@@Astrolabi ...of what exactly?
@@Astrolabi ...I'm sure you know what you mean.
@@Astrolabi ...nope. Have another go.
I'm no monarchist but this idea Archie wasn't given a title because his mother is mixed race has been proven wrong.
Charles is not king yet, how you know? Meghan said she was told that when Charles became king he was going to change rules. With the new rules Archie & Lilibet won't receive tittles. Charles is not popular, so he may change his mind and give them tittles. ( Tittles means security) Now they live in USA, Charles can keep his tittles to himself.
@@mayrav1155 he is now
British royal propaganda is also replicated here in Brazil, the mainstream media spent hours daily, for a week, just talking about her funeral. Meanwhile an African monarch gets 30 seconds coverage.
Too many people defend the monarchy by going on about how Elizabeth is just a “cute little old lady”. Let’s hope Charles’s ascension opens their eyes. 🤷🏽♀️
She was 25 when she became Queen, was she “cute “ then.
@@perfectstorm7379 not my line of defence but I don’t think most people were alive then 🙂 it’s all about (re-)branding though isn’t it
@@perfectstorm7379 she looked about 50 when she was young
@@paulhynes170 Bit of a stupid thing to say but it takes all kinds I suppose.
People just say anything to defend her. British identity is intrinsically linked to the Queen, so any criticism of her is seen as an attack on people's identity.
well done for saying what everyone else fears to say. Anyone else fed up of all grovelling "best wishes" messages from various world leaders and celebs? (you too Mr Starmer)
TOO SHORT ! Loved the concluding speech by Mia Mottley PM of Barbados . It's all about 'growing up' , becoming adult , isn't it ?
I don't think the queen would be against the wishes of the people there, she's devoted to the Commonwealth which she's worked for tirelessly all her adult life and that's what people don't understand. If hey want to become a republic or Independent no one is stopping them. Result will be they won't be able to blame others for their bad governance.
@@Claudiaxyz Mia Mottley is one of the greatest most sincere leaders the world has right now. She's the opposite of corrupt. Your whole comment is based on an assumption. The Queen has never worked tirelessly either. She's been followed round by servants and has lived an immensely privileged life. Stop drinking the kool aid
@@benmundin71 we shall see.
@@Claudiaxyz Where's the personal attack?
The biggest tourist attraction in Europe is the Palace of Versailles. 'Nuff said. LOL
Love it. Brilliant criticism of the national embarrassment that is the British monarchy. Keep up the good work, dude.
There is this lady
and she sits upon a throne,
is prone
to scoffing all the cake we make,
the cake that we should own
She wears a diamond studded crown
upon her head,
instead of helping out
and getting a job
or getting out of bed
Well I am British
and I’m super proud, yes,
of my Union Jack t-shirt
and the fact
that I am loud
Yes you will
see and hear me
standing in the crowd
I avow to fight
for Queen and Country,
plastic flag
and forehead bowed
Her Majesty ate my dinner
Does it a lot, I’m getting thinner!
I, for one, don't like loud people. The Union Jack emblazoned drunken louts and hooligans is not my England.
👍👍. Beautiful
On the throne for 70yrs, Wow that was some curry!
"Let them eat cake" is now,!Let them use food banks". It's the same old chant.
A media Panto passes by.
Happy to share a republican view.
Put out more flags.
I thought it was disturbing seeing Prince George straightening his suit jacket and copying his Dad. How has it been explained to him? One day you will be King and rule these people , why Daddy? Because you were born to rule. It's a fairytale , for them.
If she has been on the throne for 70 years I bet if she stands up her legs will fall off. It's time we are a republic. If I am on the throne for 1/2 an hour I can hardly walk until my feet recover.
people actually being hypnotized by this nonsense glad to say I have not watch a minute of it on TV
It's way past time to abolish the monarchy
I was on the throne for over 70 minutes last Sunday after a monster Saturday night. That was more than enough
Thankyou for your service
I just can't get my head around how devastating it must be to learn your child won't be given a title.
As an American, Meghan doesn't realise that protocol dictates the ruling monarch grants titles to immediate family. Therefore, the question of whether Harry's children have titles will be decided by his father when his reign starts.
@@voulafisentzidis8830 James Hewitt is not in line to take the throne.
I just thank god I live in southern Ireland and don't have to put up with all that royal shit anymore. Hopefully we get a united Ireland soon to. I could die happy then.
I have never understood why adults would want a monarchy.
Propaganda.
A brilliant presentation......I believe the Monarchy days are numbered.....
I'd like to see it happen, but its wishful thinking.