If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, Canon will allow us to choose only 3 crippling debilitations in the R6 III. Thank you for your Bitcoin donations :) bc1qacvd72s9565hpat4jueeultha3qvrv4kznyl3f Gopro 13 with 400fps?! bhpho.to/3Xte49f Canon C100 Mark II amzn.to/3Mk2qqO Canon 24mm f1.4 amzn.to/4g2XUuE All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice
We also received the press release and it says R6x III, so I think it will be 18 crippling debilitations in total (6x III), but let’s wait for an official confirmation.
You are so weird and eccentric, I’m absolutely here for it! I don’t care what you’re talking about, I just love watching your content because it’s so entertaining. Thank you for being unique and creating compelling content.
I’ve been watching this channel for years and think it’s the most useful camera gear channel on RUclips. All the things that actually matter that no one else spends time on. And also the most entertaining by far
I was a 6D guy and then R6 and then R6ii. I’m two weeks into having the R5 II. This camera has ruined me forever. My R6 II looks like when the beer goggles wear off and you realize you aren’t with the prettiest girl anymore. R5 II completes me❤
@@RandumbTech canon is claiming the stacked back illuminated sensor is what gives the r5 II 16 plus stops of dynamic range and neither the r5 or R5c have a stacked sensor nor to they exceed 15 stops. Regardless of clog2 I am more in love with RAW 12 bit in either 8k or sRAW 12bit in 4k which neither r5 or R5c offer. 4k raw 12 bit that is.
@@JaredHoyman The only benefit of the stacked sensor is the faster readout speed, which does not improve dynamic range. In fact, it actually has the opposite effect as some people has shown. That's cool that you are enjoying the new RAW recording modes. That is absolutely a limitation of the older sensor. For a working pro like yourself, it probably makes a big difference, but for the average user, I don't know that the R5ii is much of an upgrade - especially if you do stills only.
Please start a channel called Photo Conspiracies, where you review cameras for their photo qualities. Exactly the same as your video channel, but where you review everything related to photo instead of video. You are the only honest reviewer on YT.
@@cameraconspiracies But everyone else lies about cameras and I am a photo first guy, not a video guy. If you don't review cameras, how will I know which one to buy?
You did a cut after saying 9 megapixel at around 10:41. What got cut? It sounded like something funny was coming. Nice to see the hammer again. Have a great day.
@cameraconspiracies some cameras think the reflection in your sunglasses is what you are filming and the camera will focus inside the reflection as its another dimension and you will be out of focus , this happened to me few times using the A7IV
You’re right. Something will be missing. My prediction (like yours) is Clog 2 will likely be gone and anything resembling a quality codec will be missing too. It will still be more than adequate for video as the R6 mark II is. It will still destroy for photo and the AF system will be the same as far as mathematics but not the larger view finder. On a side note, It’s hard to believe that the R5 Mark II after a few firmwares won’t be insanely better than it already is. Look at where the R5 started and where it’s come. I would imagine the same road for the Mark II. I can’t wait to scoop one up eventually. But right now, due to my sports photo work I’m eyeing the R1.
One of the biggest advantages of the R5 ii is that its got C-log2, I don’t see Canon putting that in the R6 iii, that’ll definitely cripple it. The ol cripple hammer does take away from certain features, but it’s still looking strong. Also love the new shirt!
But, is the DR any better than the R5? Will anyone who see's your stuff be able to tell what camera is was shot on. Of course not, it's all about image, your image in which no one cares. 🙂
@@FlatWaterFilms well Kasey already tested the R6 ii vs the mki and it had really noisy footage and worse color science than predecessors. And of course the R5 beat them both, but even the R was seemingly better overall, minus some of the newer features.
There are plenty of dynamic range tests with R5 vs R5 II. R5 II is better because of c-log 2. If that's not in the R6 III, we'll know it was an intentional cripple.
@@cameraconspiracies Still, who's going to notice the difference? If you plan your shots and know what you're doing c-log is unnecessary, correct? Same with RAW versus JPEG.
AFTER MUCH HOMEWORK AND WAITING. I WAS PATIENT AND BOUGHT TWO NEW CAMS UPGRADING FROM NIKON, and a LOT OF CANON. Went with SONY RX100 For Grab and Go and SONY A7III FOR MORE FLEXIBILITY AND Have no plans to change. Possibly Lenses, am done The A7 is more than enough for My Use.
Is 24mp enough for weddings with my r6ii ? I need an extra body and do I go all out and add the r5ii or just wait for the r6iii ? As I only shoot photos
on a more serious note lol, I think it would make sense especially if in no rush to wait for the r6mkiii and see what it might bring to the table. I for one dont need all the bell and whistles of the r5mkii id rather save some money.
I hope Canon R6 Mark III at last will be switching from outdated, decades old front-lit to BSI-CMOS sensors, if not I'm going back to Sony. At this point mirrorless camera makers should have been experimenting with much more efficient and sensitive SPAD, quantum dot and graphene enhanced CMOS sensors. Graphene sensors are x1000 more sensitive than current ones and can detect even deep thermal infrared spectrum so just imagine enormous possibilities.
It is a side step. Both 4k 120p HD 240p. Nikon's 6k Raw is probably way more usable and easy to edit than Canon's 8k raw. I'm only thinking Canon colors and stabilization might be better, but could be wrong.
@@cameraconspiracies Fair, industry hasn't moved the framerates goal post in 4 years much to frustration! The R5II review yesterday from Gerald Undone did show very good dynamic range results with 4K120 being quite impressive. You need to loan one to try I reckon ;) Personally I am hopeful Panasonic suddenly blindsides us all with a 480 fps capable S1H mk2 or something! Any more framerate would improve the quality of added false inbetween frames done in software.
If you want muscular physique, try two orlistat, it appears to function more than the muscle builders. They got the pany boy, but I already got that. The RX0 III will crush everything in its path, fresh ARM7, bionz Thul programmable photon, gyro laser space mobilizer. Great holiday gift. Come in a gusto moxy bag, easy lens cage, cannon might be A double plus's by then, magic garden breakbills with honors.
R6 line is the photographer's line. If you enjoying cinema line then get an used R5ii for wildlife goodness. C70 it's still super 35 sensor... Z6iii not worth it because doesn't have any RED goodness and their lenses doesn't pop.
Anyone who owns a R5 mark II just know that the R3 has the same exact screen protector size, so you can get away with an R3 screen protector for your R5mkii.
Id hate to message here hoping you'll read my comment. I don't know how RUclips works anymore with messaging. I would like to send you a photo I took and would love your critique.
You mark my words, Canon will not put 4K 120 in the R6iii. They will give you HD 180 and C Log 2 and you will be grateful that the hammer doesn't hammer YOUR LIFE!
I got the R6 II when it was released and it's a beast! It's the best camera I've owned in 18 years and I used 1 Series cams for about 12 of those years. The only thing I wish it had was Clog2 and 4k120, even with a crop. Other than that it's perfect. Honestly I wish it had even the basic Clog1 for low light stuff. I don't know why Canon took it out when going from the R6 to the R6 II. The R6 II has the best 4k60 you can get right now, even better than the R5 II, and Canon improved the colour on that cam from the R6 original.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, Canon will allow us to choose only 3 crippling debilitations in the R6 III.
Thank you for your Bitcoin donations :) bc1qacvd72s9565hpat4jueeultha3qvrv4kznyl3f
Gopro 13 with 400fps?! bhpho.to/3Xte49f
Canon C100 Mark II amzn.to/3Mk2qqO
Canon 24mm f1.4 amzn.to/4g2XUuE
All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice
We also received the press release and it says R6x III, so I think it will be 18 crippling debilitations in total (6x III), but let’s wait for an official confirmation.
Johnson lives on in the consumer’s heart.
We get a cripple hammer, board room meeting and a "your mom" joke all in one video!
You are so weird and eccentric, I’m absolutely here for it! I don’t care what you’re talking about, I just love watching your content because it’s so entertaining. Thank you for being unique and creating compelling content.
I’ve been watching this channel for years and think it’s the most useful camera gear channel on RUclips. All the things that actually matter that no one else spends time on. And also the most entertaining by far
you're bang on, just wish i could afford the cameras :)
I was a 6D guy and then R6 and then R6ii. I’m two weeks into having the R5 II. This camera has ruined me forever. My R6 II looks like when the beer goggles wear off and you realize you aren’t with the prettiest girl anymore. R5 II completes me❤
Been watching your videos about it! Love seeing your comments in the wild
@@codythep I appreciate it! More to come. Now we just need Kasey to buy the R5 II.
They could have added CLOG2 via firmware to the original R5 and that would have given you the dynamic range you are enamored with.
@@RandumbTech canon is claiming the stacked back illuminated sensor is what gives the r5 II 16 plus stops of dynamic range and neither the r5 or R5c have a stacked sensor nor to they exceed 15 stops. Regardless of clog2 I am more in love with RAW 12 bit in either 8k or sRAW 12bit in 4k which neither r5 or R5c offer. 4k raw 12 bit that is.
@@JaredHoyman The only benefit of the stacked sensor is the faster readout speed, which does not improve dynamic range. In fact, it actually has the opposite effect as some people has shown. That's cool that you are enjoying the new RAW recording modes. That is absolutely a limitation of the older sensor. For a working pro like yourself, it probably makes a big difference, but for the average user, I don't know that the R5ii is much of an upgrade - especially if you do stills only.
Please start a channel called Photo Conspiracies, where you review cameras for their photo qualities.
Exactly the same as your video channel, but where you review everything related to photo instead of video. You are the only honest reviewer on YT.
Thanks. And no lol.
@@cameraconspiracies But everyone else lies about cameras and I am a photo first guy, not a video guy. If you don't review cameras, how will I know which one to buy?
8:14 that quick mom joke while the opportunity is there, pure gold!
Love how Johnson is talking to Travis from Taxi Driver. 😎
You aren’t thinking like Canon enough, R6iii no mic jack and no audio at all other than in 720p, and photo video switch in the battery compartment.
Custom WB picture thing is just silly! I never use it, so awkward.
You did a cut after saying 9 megapixel at around 10:41. What got cut? It sounded like something funny was coming. Nice to see the hammer again. Have a great day.
I would love to see what a C70 ii would be
owning those glasses Brh... I''ll leave now.
The Canon Cripple Hammer never gets old.
Wait for the Canon R5C mark II.
Im afraid of watching this video and wanting me to ditch the r6 ii
@cameraconspiracies some cameras think the reflection in your sunglasses is what you are filming and the camera will focus inside the reflection as its another dimension and you will be out of focus , this happened to me few times using the A7IV
This video looks INSANELY Good!
I'm starting to call all feature downgrades "cripple hammered"
Weirdly - no one bats an eye when I say it. It's standard lexicon now.
You’re right. Something will be missing. My prediction (like yours) is Clog 2 will likely be gone and anything resembling a quality codec will be missing too. It will still be more than adequate for video as the R6 mark II is. It will still destroy for photo and the AF system will be the same as far as mathematics but not the larger view finder. On a side note, It’s hard to believe that the R5 Mark II after a few firmwares won’t be insanely better than it already is. Look at where the R5 started and where it’s come. I would imagine the same road for the Mark II. I can’t wait to scoop one up eventually. But right now, due to my sports photo work I’m eyeing the R1.
Do you have an affiliate link for that full auto Glock that shoots entire cartridges? That's 60% more bullet per bullet!
I have adapted my old EF lenses on a canon body, but the Servo AF in video gives that constant noise. I love the silence of the RF lenses.
Can we have a Board Room Meetings Playlist?
I’m definitely buying a Canon when they release the RQZ666.
any excitement on the rumored upcoming DJI camera (APS C or FF)?
The austerity cripple hammer is expanding across the industry
Great meeting 😂
will you test gopro hero 13 black ?
I'm waiting for R5 VI!
One of the biggest advantages of the R5 ii is that its got C-log2, I don’t see Canon putting that in the R6 iii, that’ll definitely cripple it. The ol cripple hammer does take away from certain features, but it’s still looking strong.
Also love the new shirt!
But, is the DR any better than the R5? Will anyone who see's your stuff be able to tell what camera is was shot on. Of course not, it's all about image, your image in which no one cares. 🙂
@@FlatWaterFilms well Kasey already tested the R6 ii vs the mki and it had really noisy footage and worse color science than predecessors. And of course the R5 beat them both, but even the R was seemingly better overall, minus some of the newer features.
There are plenty of dynamic range tests with R5 vs R5 II. R5 II is better because of c-log 2. If that's not in the R6 III, we'll know it was an intentional cripple.
@@cameraconspiracies Still, who's going to notice the difference? If you plan your shots and know what you're doing c-log is unnecessary, correct? Same with RAW versus JPEG.
@@FlatWaterFilms R5 is in the low 13 stop of DR in Clog3 and the R5II is in the high 15 with Clog2. 2+stop of DR is like going from m43 to FF.
Bad ass look, bro 😎
AFTER MUCH HOMEWORK AND WAITING. I WAS PATIENT AND BOUGHT TWO NEW CAMS UPGRADING FROM NIKON, and a LOT OF CANON.
Went with SONY RX100 For Grab and Go and
SONY A7III FOR MORE FLEXIBILITY AND Have no plans to change.
Possibly Lenses,
am done The A7 is more than enough
for My Use.
You are the best comedian I know 😂
Is 24mp enough for weddings with my r6ii ? I need an extra body and do I go all out and add the r5ii or just wait for the r6iii ? As I only shoot photos
The Canon cripple hammer! Can you patent that phrase?
I get super excited every time I see a new video posted from either of this man’s awesome channels.
SONY A7R5. BEST STABE AND DYNAMIC RANGE. NO NEED TO USE LOG, JUST ENHANCE NT PROFILE!
Johnson, you were only asking for trouble 😱. 🏴.. .
on a more serious note lol, I think it would make sense especially if in no rush to wait for the r6mkiii and see what it might bring to the table. I for one dont need all the bell and whistles of the r5mkii id rather save some money.
No stacked sensor for the R6 II. BSI only at 24 MP. Two SD card slots; no CF Express. So, no 4K/120; but maybe HD/240. Wave forms but no false colors.
I hope Canon R6 Mark III at last will be switching from outdated, decades old front-lit to BSI-CMOS sensors, if not I'm going back to Sony. At this point mirrorless camera makers should have been experimenting with much more efficient and sensitive SPAD, quantum dot and graphene enhanced CMOS sensors. Graphene sensors are x1000 more sensitive than current ones and can detect even deep thermal infrared spectrum so just imagine enormous possibilities.
r5 ii. canon has finally caught up to the a1 and you deserve it. give us the 8k that we deserve mr. conspiracy.
I´m pretty sure you will buy the R5II 🙂
this guy😄🥰
Muffs should have more respect. Some photographers even have them in their pictures (their last name rhymes with Ranger).
you sound like agent Smith from the Matrix ..... " Iam gonna enjoy watching you make this video Mr. Anderson "
Gotta be the R5II, if you are gonna upgrade from the Nikon its got to be a real jump up not a side step in similar tier
It is a side step. Both 4k 120p HD 240p. Nikon's 6k Raw is probably way more usable and easy to edit than Canon's 8k raw. I'm only thinking Canon colors and stabilization might be better, but could be wrong.
@@cameraconspiracies Fair, industry hasn't moved the framerates goal post in 4 years much to frustration! The R5II review yesterday from Gerald Undone did show very good dynamic range results with 4K120 being quite impressive. You need to loan one to try I reckon ;)
Personally I am hopeful Panasonic suddenly blindsides us all with a 480 fps capable S1H mk2 or something! Any more framerate would improve the quality of added false inbetween frames done in software.
@@spencerl885 Even if they do it will be manual focus only lol.
Poor Johnson.. Lol
With a price tag over $4K for just the body, it might be better to wait for a winning lottery ticket!
Sunglasses indoors? Are you channeling Casey Neistat these days?
Red Komodo X has just gone on special… 🤩🙌
Still more expensive that if it was used lol.
Go away! Debating!
If you want muscular physique, try two orlistat, it appears to function more than the muscle builders. They got the pany boy, but I already got that. The RX0 III will crush everything in its path, fresh ARM7, bionz Thul programmable photon, gyro laser space mobilizer. Great holiday gift. Come in a gusto moxy bag, easy lens cage, cannon might be A double plus's by then, magic garden breakbills with honors.
If you accidentally take pictures of wildlife… is where the R5ii would come in handy. The video should be better on the R6iii
R6 line is the photographer's line. If you enjoying cinema line then get an used R5ii for wildlife goodness. C70 it's still super 35 sensor... Z6iii not worth it because doesn't have any RED goodness and their lenses doesn't pop.
C70 also has a speedbooster. Can't speedboost a C100 lol.
9:40 In gerald undones video he actually showd that the R5 II has great Dynamic range results even in 4k120
But the R6 III probably won't have Clog2.
R6 III will be majorly crippled, its gonna go from full frame to micro four thirds just to make you angry.
Dammit
Anyone who owns a R5 mark II just know that the R3 has the same exact screen protector size, so you can get away with an R3 screen protector for your R5mkii.
Wait for the first one that hits $9,000 and demand a FREE battery and card from your dealer. If Nikon gets there first then you're a winner.
Id hate to message here hoping you'll read my comment. I don't know how RUclips works anymore with messaging. I would like to send you a photo I took and would love your critique.
Why not pick up a used R5?
It's terrible.
I can see it not having a stacked sensor nor clog 2 and only one cfexpress slot.
I need help. I’m a Nikon fanboy can you give me free phototherapy? To clarify not video therapy.
You mark my words, Canon will not put 4K 120 in the R6iii. They will give you HD 180 and C Log 2 and you will be grateful that the hammer doesn't hammer YOUR LIFE!
People are still having problems with mirrorless... I'll stick with my DSLRs. Thank You.
I got the R6 II when it was released and it's a beast! It's the best camera I've owned in 18 years and I used 1 Series cams for about 12 of those years. The only thing I wish it had was Clog2 and 4k120, even with a crop. Other than that it's perfect. Honestly I wish it had even the basic Clog1 for low light stuff. I don't know why Canon took it out when going from the R6 to the R6 II.
The R6 II has the best 4k60 you can get right now, even better than the R5 II, and Canon improved the colour on that cam from the R6 original.
mf here crazy lmao 600mm tony L
The stys are back, huh? Man get some dewormer.
Toneh 11 prime 🤮
🤣
Lmfao