@@kerrycturesproductions if you get it off court tv…..no volume for anybody but the judge. I have volume on 40 and can barely hear. Then the judge talks and blows my speakers! I hope it is not like this the whole trial!
I would too! But Sarah Boone? Nope. She would have to admit she's guilty. Sarah is incapable of taking accountability in any way shape or form. Even if it's to help herself.
No I wouldn’t lie to get on the jury to make sure she got guilty. I wouldn’t be able to be on the jury because I really don’t believe what happened to Jorge was accidental or excusable, and I don’t know if the defense would really be able to change my mind at this point and I want her to have a fair trial, I really do. And I don’t agree that letting cameras in the court leads to unfairness- trials have always been meant to be public. People with too much power who can decree people guilty and lock them up or have them killed would absolutely abuse that power because humans are flawed that way. Accountability is necessary, and public viewing is part of accountability
They are only considering closing the court for the one single hearing where the physical evidence the state has is presented to Sarah since she is pro se. Typically this is done behind closed doors and not in the court at all but in this case since Sarah is pro se they had to made an arrangement that includes a record so that Sarah can't claim she never saw something before. The issue is that if the media gets to be at this preview it will give Sarah grounds for appeal on the basis of an unduly prejudiced jury pool and that might work. I worry that the state won't want to retry this case if the appellate division tosses it back to the trial court.
@@tsuritsa3105 yes I get that but with the judge there is becomes an issue. They can still do it without the judge and the Prosecutors pay for the court reporter to take down the transcript of everything that is spoken.
judge kraynick is doing an excellent job so far, I would leave this to him to decide. There are billions of people that know nothing of Sarah Boone. local news interviewed 4 attys outside the courthouse, 3 had never heard of Sarah, 1 vaguely knew her name.
Judge Kraynick seemed to have anticipated this Motion would be filed by the Media. He's steps ahead, and steering a course to ward off any appellate issues that could later be successfully argued. I could be wrong, but he certainly seems to be the right Judge for this case.
@@byBeauxARTFULIVING there is actually a US Supreme Court guide to all courts in US regarding how to handling a Pro Se/Per deFENDANTS. It was followed by judge J.Dorow and now in this case. This judge are questioning her answers "a lot - most" - not letting her rest in her lies (its still court meetings before trial - but she is swan in - so she is obliged to tell the troth (which she have trouble to do - and the judge knows that - brilliant move by the judge)
JAC has been funding Boone's defense since early April 2020, less than two months after her case was filed Feb 25, 2020. Atty Padilla indicates that while he was hired, he was never paid anything, and in April 2020 asked the court to establish and order Boone indigent, so that he could get the JAC to pay travel expenses, experts, etc. It would be so revealing to put together and show a video covering all the experts that have been asked for and how much the JAC has approved as to funding.
Yes, bcz I recall Transparent Tea showing a visitor log where Sarah had many many hours with a Dv expert and many other attys or experts over since arrested
@@byBeauxARTFULIVING yes, I revisited the early case docket last night, but lost track of how many because there were so many. I did find where another investigator from Prison Break was on her case, I think in regards to mitigation, but she did not last long at all. ....it made me wonder if Boone does not work well with other females?
SO THRILLED that SB can’t manipulate her investigator into giving her legal advise or helping her in anyway that is representative of legal advise or actions a Lawyer would perform for her! I was anticipating SB attempting to do this and still feel she will throw her investigator under the bus when he refuses to assist her as a Lawyer would! Expect more long, manipulative, arrogant letters/motions by SB complaining about the investigators ‘lack’ of assistance that she seems his job!!!
I’d actually bet that the closest she gets to that (which would be admitting even to herself that she did something wrong) is that she wishes her last lawyer hadn’t been so “snotty” that she had to call her out on it and bring in pretend judge and leave meetings. I feel pretty confident in guessing that she still would shift the blame to that lawyer for the relationship not working out- but I totally agree that she wishes it had worked out!
No way! I would have to tell the truth as I do not want to do something like that affecting someone's life. Karma is a B*&ch!! I wouldn't want that done to me.
If she bothered to read the indigent's guide to self-destruction, I'll bet her loophole excuse mode will kick in. Judge Kraynick's legal phrasing of "oh, well" will be one for a bumper sticker.
This is a discovery exchange being handled in court because Sarah is an inmate. It would prejudice the potential jury pool to have the media there. Secondly, the discovery will be graphic as it includes autopsy photos as well as other sensitive discovery. Since Sarah doesn't know what she is doing, her discovery may not be admissible for trial. The judge will have an obligation to keep the media out of discovery to protect Sarah's pro se' rights. The judge may move the discovery to another secure location. However, the courtroom is ideal as it is already secure within a secure building. There is likely case law for this circumstance.
As a Third Party Intervener in this matter, Sarah should save that Docket Sheet, Time and Date Stamped, along with her client's Bill of Particulars, for evidence. Given how close the case is to the Atlantic, I wonder if this is an Admiralty Court or a Military Court.
I don't have to lie to get on juries because whenever I get one of those summonses in the mail, it goes straight into the trash. The trick to avoiding jury service is to never respond to those notices. Once you respond, you're on the hook.
Appeals happen if her rights were violated during the evidentiary trial. If it’s open to the public….its open! Guess you wouldn’t have to worry about any of this if you didn’t commit a crime. If she wants so much privacy….she should have pled! Not like there isn’t video evidence! Gesh!
4:00 No, I wouldn’t. I personally have never had jury duty, but I think I would be a fair juror if I don’t know anything ahead of time about the case. Now, with that being said, I’m still going to admit that I absolutely believe Sarah is guilty. But ESPECIALLY because I want to see her convicted, I would be honest about my knowledge in her case, which I believe would get me kicked off the jury,l. I wouldn’t do anything to jeopardize her being able to get a mistrial or win an appeal. As far as I understand, if someone lies on the jury to get there just to convict her, then it could potentially ruin the trial. (Please feel free to correct me on any of this if you know I’m wrong about anything!) I wouldn’t want to risk being caught essentially when I believe the state wouldn’t *need* biased jurors to find her guilty.
I just realized I wrote some things wrong in there, but I can’t edit it on my phone! 🥴 I meant to say I wouldn’t do anything to jeopardize the case, where she would be able to get a mistrial or win an appeal. Thankfully you all seemed to understand what I was trying to say anyways! 😃😊
The media and the public do not have the right to see the evidence before the trial begins. The judge should hold the hearing under seal and keep everything under seal until after the trial just like every other court case across the country
@@byBeauxARTFULIVING i am familiar with fla sunshine laws. They are why we are blessed every day with new Fla bodycam vids on YT. Im just saying that nothing in them suggests that evidentuary hearings are required to be held in open public. Example: Photographs of dead or mutilated bodies, abused children, sexxxual assault victims identities...many things are kept under seal until a verdict is reached
Okay... Although I agree that there may be some appellate sharks circling around right now and perhaps even be eager to take this case on.... HOWEVER....one minute, fifteen seconds AT THE MOST with defendant boone opening her cake eater and all those eager beaver appellate lawyers will RUN LIKE HELL!! Ole' boonie herself is headed straight to helll with gasoline drawers on 😆
@@LisaPeterson227 .. Awe.. thank you. I so very much want to take credit for that little ditty, .... but unfortunately, I must give credit where credit is due and I stole this saying from my INCREDIBLY HILARIOUS RUclips friend Cathy at "gossip, rumor and innuendo". Thank you again for the kindness 💯😆🙏✝️❤️
I would NEVER lie to get on a jury. I really don't believe most people would consider doing that. In addition, most people try to avoid jury service. I'm more likely to believe potential jurors would lie to GET OUT of jury service. As far as Sarah's evidence and whether we should see her viewing it: We, the public, probably already know what 95% of it is. It's easy to find between all of the interviews and body cams and some of the legal paperwork. Not to mention Sarah's letters. So I really don't think there is much of a risk that the streaming the evidence viewing adds any harm to Sarah or the jury pool. I think Sarah thinks she is going to be able to pick up, touch, and manipulate everything. She might be able to in a limited capacity but I highly doubt she's going to be allowed to do what she would like to do. Of course, these are only my opinions.
Kerry thats a great question, would i lie to get on the jury to convict Sarah Boone, i dont know if i would go that far but if i was picked, just from the interrogation with the police, i would say yes she is guilty !!!
I believe that most Americans would be fair, either by admitting they know too much already or because they are capable of having an open mind. I absolutely would NOT lie to get on the jury and I truly believe most people would not. Also, these days the Court can look at social media posts to see if potential jurors have publicly let on that they know about a case.
IMO the best irony in this is that she has insisted forever to get evert piece of paper from the beginning. Now she is being inundated with tons of documents. Her next complaint will be that she doesn't have time before trial to read it all LOL. Should have kept a lawyer Boones Farm
Ok now I have to be honest for a minute so I think we can all be influenced to not tell the truth but our Countrys Judicial System with some flaws is still the best in this Messed Up World 🌎💯🙏🔒🤗 now I am going back to not be so serious or this World 🌎 will Explode so please take every chance you get to smile and Laugh my friend's 💚💯🤗💚😂🤗
If the judge is in attendance this is now a “hearing” and Florida is an open court state. They can move it to a. They can move it to a room at the jail.
@@TanikaTwoCents if they move it outside of the courtroom without the Judge a record can still be made by having a court reporter making a transcript, which he also said.
@@AnaFernandez-jp5uh well they can find another place and the judge does not need be present that’s the point. Sarah will always try to keep the cameras out, I think she will also ask that no media be allowed for the actual trial.
How do you know that the trials were fairer when cameras weren’t recording and broadcasting it? I think they are fairer now because the world is watching and therefore they are more careful.
I don’t think the judges and legal experts are going to allow for her case to be appealed due to their mistake. The cases that are successfully appealed haven’t increased due to cameras. I’m sure they’re going to raise the issue that she didn’t want to go Pro-se but I don’t think it’s going to have anything to do with cameras being present.
Evidence: The suitcase The baseball bat Photos of Jorge's blunt force injuries that likely were cause by the baseball bat while he was in the suitcase. Digital Evidence: The video of her sadistically taunting Jorge as he began to suffocate to death. The 911 call, in which she clearly said, "I put him in the suitcase." The interviews of Sarah's ex husband, landlord, neighbors, Jorge's family, The Publics employee The interrogation of Sarah the day she was arrested and charged with 2nd Degree Murder. Did I miss anything?
Did Brookes get a jury? She gets to say yes, or no to jurors? She will go through the whole state of Fla. I can see Sarah, "Do you own suitcases"? Yes, "Dismissed". She will copy what the prosecution does to pick the jury, and get the jury prosecution wants. 😂 She isnt supposed to have copy access in jail.
That’s a great question! But… if she does, she will get hammered by prosecutor on cross examination! So… she can give a closing statement and tell her story, and the prosecutor cannot cross examine her on her closing. Just like Darrell Brooks.
I would not get in to vote her guilty. And I'm not sure what the charge is exactly and what it means in that state to even think she meets the guidelines. I do not think it was intentional but her actions did lead to his death.
Join us 8/14/24 for Night Court to watch the hearing ruclips.net/user/liveh04eFjnmiU0?feature=share
@@kerrycturesproductions if you get it off court tv…..no volume for anybody but the judge. I have volume on 40 and can barely hear. Then the judge talks and blows my speakers! I hope it is not like this the whole trial!
I agree, Boone is going to want to manipulate that suitcase. And, she doesn't want the media watching her do that.
If I were Sarah I would take 1 look at these documents and call the state and take a plea deal
I would too!
But Sarah Boone? Nope.
She would have to admit she's guilty.
Sarah is incapable of taking accountability in any way shape or form. Even if it's to help herself.
YEP
Thank you for reading this JAC letter, it’s awesome!
No I wouldn’t lie to get on the jury to make sure she got guilty. I wouldn’t be able to be on the jury because I really don’t believe what happened to Jorge was accidental or excusable, and I don’t know if the defense would really be able to change my mind at this point and I want her to have a fair trial, I really do. And I don’t agree that letting cameras in the court leads to unfairness- trials have always been meant to be public. People with too much power who can decree people guilty and lock them up or have them killed would absolutely abuse that power because humans are flawed that way. Accountability is necessary, and public viewing is part of accountability
I could never lie just to be io a jury. Honesty is what it is about. Do I wish I could be in the courtroom during this trial, you betcha I do!
They are only considering closing the court for the one single hearing where the physical evidence the state has is presented to Sarah since she is pro se. Typically this is done behind closed doors and not in the court at all but in this case since Sarah is pro se they had to made an arrangement that includes a record so that Sarah can't claim she never saw something before. The issue is that if the media gets to be at this preview it will give Sarah grounds for appeal on the basis of an unduly prejudiced jury pool and that might work. I worry that the state won't want to retry this case if the appellate division tosses it back to the trial court.
@@tsuritsa3105 yes I get that but with the judge there is becomes an issue. They can still do it without the judge and the Prosecutors pay for the court reporter to take down the transcript of everything that is spoken.
@@tsuritsa3105 almost impossible to get an appeal for jury’s. They take an oath, and unless they do something really stupid, not much she can do!
judge kraynick is doing an excellent job so far, I would leave this to him to decide. There are billions of people that know nothing of Sarah Boone. local news interviewed 4 attys outside the courthouse, 3 had never heard of Sarah, 1 vaguely knew her name.
Judge Kraynick seemed to have anticipated this Motion would be filed by the Media. He's steps ahead, and steering a course to ward off any appellate issues that could later be successfully argued. I could be wrong, but he certainly seems to be the right Judge for this case.
She’s a legend in her own mind. 🙄
Saw that too - and none of them would take the case
@@heleneschmidt8419 yes, and im really upset that mentour lawyer is helping Sarah and not helping the Torres family.
@@byBeauxARTFULIVING there is actually a US Supreme Court guide to all courts in US regarding how to handling a Pro Se/Per deFENDANTS.
It was followed by judge J.Dorow and now in this case.
This judge are questioning her answers "a lot - most" - not letting her rest in her lies (its still court meetings before trial - but she is swan in - so she is obliged to tell the troth (which she have trouble to do - and the judge knows that - brilliant move by the judge)
JAC has been funding Boone's defense since early April 2020, less than two months after her case was filed Feb 25, 2020. Atty Padilla indicates that while he was hired, he was never paid anything, and in April 2020 asked the court to establish and order Boone indigent, so that he could get the JAC to pay travel expenses, experts, etc. It would be so revealing to put together and show a video covering all the experts that have been asked for and how much the JAC has approved as to funding.
Yes, bcz I recall Transparent Tea showing a visitor log where Sarah had many many hours with a Dv expert and many other attys or experts over since arrested
@@byBeauxARTFULIVING yes, I revisited the early case docket last night, but lost track of how many because there were so many. I did find where another investigator from Prison Break was on her case, I think in regards to mitigation, but she did not last long at all. ....it made me wonder if Boone does not work well with other females?
@@ritahawkins2336 hahaha I dont think Sarah works well with other humans
SO THRILLED that SB can’t manipulate her investigator into giving her legal advise or helping her in anyway that is representative of legal advise or actions a Lawyer would perform for her! I was anticipating SB attempting to do this and still feel she will throw her investigator under the bus when he refuses to assist her as a Lawyer would! Expect more long, manipulative, arrogant letters/motions by SB complaining about the investigators ‘lack’ of assistance that she seems his job!!!
YOU are hysterical! She's dying to get her hands on the suitcase!😅
Bet Boone wishes she'd co operated with her last lawyer
I’d actually bet that the closest she gets to that (which would be admitting even to herself that she did something wrong) is that she wishes her last lawyer hadn’t been so “snotty” that she had to call her out on it and bring in pretend judge and leave meetings. I feel pretty confident in guessing that she still would shift the blame to that lawyer for the relationship not working out- but I totally agree that she wishes it had worked out!
Patricia Cashman was the best criminal defense attorney on the PD list at the time Sarah got her. Sarah screwed up bad losing Cashman.
Sarah Boone wishes they would have cooperated with her because she has done nothing wrong.
@@RebekahR213😂 for real
No way! I would have to tell the truth as I do not want to do something like that affecting someone's life. Karma is a B*&ch!! I wouldn't want that done to me.
If she bothered to read the indigent's guide to self-destruction, I'll bet her loophole excuse mode will kick in. Judge Kraynick's legal phrasing of "oh, well" will be one for a bumper sticker.
Alcohol bottles, he phone and the suitcase. She really really wanted to get her hands on that phone for some reason.
I think sarah ought to ask them to zip her into that suitcase to prove how easy it was for jorge to get out on his own!
This is a discovery exchange being handled in court because Sarah is an inmate. It would prejudice the potential jury pool to have the media there. Secondly, the discovery will be graphic as it includes autopsy photos as well as other sensitive discovery. Since Sarah doesn't know what she is doing, her discovery may not be admissible for trial. The judge will have an obligation to keep the media out of discovery to protect Sarah's pro se' rights. The judge may move the discovery to another secure location. However, the courtroom is ideal as it is already secure within a secure building. There is likely case law for this circumstance.
I agree with all of your points….
Normally discovery is handled behind closed between Attorneys anyway..
As a Third Party Intervener in this matter, Sarah should save that Docket Sheet, Time and Date Stamped, along with her client's Bill of Particulars, for evidence. Given how close the case is to the Atlantic, I wonder if this is an Admiralty Court or a Military Court.
I don't have to lie to get on juries because whenever I get one of those summonses in the mail, it goes straight into the trash. The trick to avoiding jury service is to never respond to those notices. Once you respond, you're on the hook.
🤭👍
That’s hilarious 😂
What the heck are you talking about?
There's no such thing except in the fantasies of "sovereign citizens". She's in county criminal court.
Not "Suitcase Sarah". I. AM. DEAD. 😂😂
She can’t have everything her way!!!! She gave Jorge no choices in his terrible death!!!
Appeals happen if her rights were violated during the evidentiary trial. If it’s open to the public….its open! Guess you wouldn’t have to worry about any of this if you didn’t commit a crime. If she wants so much privacy….she should have pled! Not like there isn’t video evidence! Gesh!
4:00 No, I wouldn’t. I personally have never had jury duty, but I think I would be a fair juror if I don’t know anything ahead of time about the case.
Now, with that being said, I’m still going to admit that I absolutely believe Sarah is guilty. But ESPECIALLY because I want to see her convicted, I would be honest about my knowledge in her case, which I believe would get me kicked off the jury,l. I wouldn’t do anything to jeopardize her being able to get a mistrial or win an appeal. As far as I understand, if someone lies on the jury to get there just to convict her, then it could potentially ruin the trial. (Please feel free to correct me on any of this if you know I’m wrong about anything!)
I wouldn’t want to risk being caught essentially when I believe the state wouldn’t *need* biased jurors to find her guilty.
I just realized I wrote some things wrong in there, but I can’t edit it on my phone! 🥴
I meant to say I wouldn’t do anything to jeopardize the case, where she would be able to get a mistrial or win an appeal.
Thankfully you all seemed to understand what I was trying to say anyways! 😃😊
It do not matter where she has court someone will see and know. I'm in OKC
No I wouldn’t do anything to jeopardize her conviction
The media and the public do not have the right to see the evidence before the trial begins. The judge should hold the hearing under seal and keep everything under seal until after the trial just like every other court case across the country
I respect your opinions 💯
are you familiar with sunshine laws ?
@@byBeauxARTFULIVING i am familiar with fla sunshine laws. They are why we are blessed every day with new Fla bodycam vids on YT. Im just saying that nothing in them suggests that evidentuary hearings are required to be held in open public. Example: Photographs of dead or mutilated bodies, abused children, sexxxual assault victims identities...many things are kept under seal until a verdict is reached
@@Timmichanga361 I understand, Sarah Boone is a legend in her own mind
HANGIN OUT WITH THE KEWL KIDS TODAY!!! The re-watch...crew 😂
What time does the hearing start?
ruclips.net/video/h04eFjnmiU0/видео.html
Yep, they are going to line up to defend her appeal just like they lined up to defend her. Please!!
Okay... Although I agree that there may be some appellate sharks circling around right now and perhaps even be eager to take this case on.... HOWEVER....one minute, fifteen seconds AT THE MOST with defendant boone opening her cake eater and all those eager beaver appellate lawyers will RUN LIKE HELL!! Ole' boonie herself is headed straight to helll with gasoline drawers on 😆
Gasoline drawers. Too funny. Never heard anyone say that. 😂
@@LisaPeterson227 .. Awe.. thank you. I so very much want to take credit for that little ditty, .... but unfortunately, I must give credit where credit is due and I stole this saying from my INCREDIBLY HILARIOUS RUclips friend Cathy at "gossip, rumor and innuendo". Thank you again for the kindness 💯😆🙏✝️❤️
I would NEVER lie to get on a jury. I really don't believe most people would consider doing that. In addition, most people try to avoid jury service. I'm more likely to believe potential jurors would lie to GET OUT of jury service. As far as Sarah's evidence and whether we should see her viewing it: We, the public, probably already know what 95% of it is. It's easy to find between all of the interviews and body cams and some of the legal paperwork. Not to mention Sarah's letters. So I really don't think there is much of a risk that the streaming the evidence viewing adds any harm to Sarah or the jury pool. I think Sarah thinks she is going to be able to pick up, touch, and manipulate everything. She might be able to in a limited capacity but I highly doubt she's going to be allowed to do what she would like to do. Of course, these are only my opinions.
Kerry thats a great question, would i lie to get on the jury to convict Sarah Boone, i dont know if i would go that far but if i was picked, just from the interrogation with the police, i would say yes she is guilty !!!
I believe that most Americans would be fair, either by admitting they know too much already or because they are capable of having an open mind. I absolutely would NOT lie to get on the jury and I truly believe most people would not. Also, these days the Court can look at social media posts to see if potential jurors have publicly let on that they know about a case.
No I definitely wouldn't lie to fo find her or anyone else guilty. I would want her to have a fair trial.
IMO the best irony in this is that she has insisted forever to get evert piece of paper from the beginning. Now she is being inundated with tons of documents. Her next complaint will be that she doesn't have time before trial to read it all LOL. Should have kept a lawyer Boones Farm
I agree about the appeal opportunities but I think this case will be an appellate circus no matter what this judge does.
Are we going to be able to watch today's hearing?
We are watching at 6pm tonight if you would like to join us ruclips.net/user/liveh04eFjnmiU0?feature=share
Nope - I’d be upfront as a potential juror. I never could lie! I’d give myself away in a minute! 😅👍
Good morning
Morning, Paula!
Good morning Puala
Ok now I have to be honest for a minute so I think we can all be influenced to not tell the truth but our Countrys Judicial System with some flaws is still the best in this Messed Up World 🌎💯🙏🔒🤗 now I am going back to not be so serious or this World 🌎 will Explode so please take every chance you get to smile and Laugh my friend's 💚💯🤗💚😂🤗
If the judge is in attendance this is now a “hearing” and Florida is an open court state. They can move it to a. They can move it to a room at the jail.
@@TanikaTwoCents if they move it outside of the courtroom without the Judge a record can still be made by having a court reporter making a transcript, which he also said.
That will not happen. The judge, prosecution and evidence must be protected and the jail is not that place.
@@AnaFernandez-jp5uh well they can find another place and the judge does not need be present that’s the point.
Sarah will always try to keep the cameras out, I think she will also ask that no media be allowed for the actual trial.
Are you saying that you DON'T want cameras in every hearing it's typically open to? Or, the trial?
Just this one hearing (uh oh I sound like Sarah) I just do not want the trial to be jeopardized.
No, the rare cases where somebody lies to get on a jury they're pretty stupid and they end up going to jail for contempt.
Good Morning. Kerry
Beautiful Bama 💚 I see you friend 💚😂
How do you know that the trials were fairer when cameras weren’t recording and broadcasting it? I think they are fairer now because the world is watching and therefore they are more careful.
I don’t think the judges and legal experts are going to allow for her case to be appealed due to their mistake. The cases that are successfully appealed haven’t increased due to cameras. I’m sure they’re going to raise the issue that she didn’t want to go Pro-se but I don’t think it’s going to have anything to do with cameras being present.
Evidence:
The suitcase
The baseball bat
Photos of Jorge's blunt force injuries that likely were cause by the baseball bat while he was in the suitcase.
Digital Evidence:
The video of her sadistically taunting Jorge as he began to suffocate to death.
The 911 call, in which she clearly said, "I put him in the suitcase."
The interviews of Sarah's ex husband, landlord, neighbors, Jorge's family, The Publics employee
The interrogation of Sarah the day she was arrested and charged with 2nd Degree Murder.
Did I miss anything?
Did Brookes get a jury? She gets to say yes, or no to jurors? She will go through the whole state of Fla. I can see Sarah, "Do you own suitcases"? Yes, "Dismissed". She will copy what the prosecution does to pick the jury, and get the jury prosecution wants. 😂 She isnt supposed to have copy access in jail.
Do you think she will testify?
Absolutely. Sarah is a narcissist and must tell her story. This is likely why is is without counsel.
@@AnaFernandez-jp5uh Agree 1,000%!
Absolutely!!!
That’s a great question! But… if she does, she will get hammered by prosecutor on cross examination!
So… she can give a closing statement and tell her story, and the prosecutor cannot cross examine her on her closing. Just like Darrell Brooks.
I would not get in to vote her guilty. And I'm not sure what the charge is exactly and what it means in that state to even think she meets the guidelines. I do not think it was intentional but her actions did lead to his death.
she needs at least weslaw if she has no layer c mon. also she s totally guilty and going down but still... let's be fair at least??
Good morning