Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Joe Rogan Experience
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 июн 2024
- Matt Walsh is a political commentator, author, filmmaker, and host of "The Matt Walsh Podcast." Stream his new documentary "What is a Woman?" at www.dailywire.com. www.dailywire.com/author/matt-walsh
My Psychiatrist said that she went form ZERO cases where kids thought they were meant to be the opposite sex to 8/10 children she sees. We are putting this in our kids heads. These are things that should be dealt with organically
Strange thing, Jessica - I am a white South African, and honestly the only places here where this is becoming prevalent, is in Liberal white communities. Most black people would think you are crazy if you mention such a thing. It is interesting how Africans are liberal/leftist when it comes to economics, but extremely conservative on topics such as family.
It’s sick. Our kids are being brainwashed by a communist party in the US. I live in ND which is super red and I also live out in the boonies and there’s a kid in our children’s small school that claims to be “trans.” This nonsense has spread everywhere. I don’t care what anyone does as an adult but, I draw a line at kids and I cannot believe we are not all in agreement on this.
My therapist said the same. 100% social contagion.
That’s terrible but not surprising. It’s all about attention now. Btw, WE aren’t doing this, THEY are.
Becky Weiss did a great video on IG where she says if she was a few years younger she might have gotten sucked into the trans ideology . She’s always been a tomboy and if someone had said to her ‘you’re really a boy’ at a vulnerable time in her development , she might have believed it. It’s so unfortunate that young girls are now questioning their gender just because they don’t fit into the stereotype of Barbie loving girls.
This is why Joe is the king. They agree for 70% of the interview and disagree on 30% yet the conversation goes on. People get to listen and decide for themselves.
And Matt bruh.
They were really dancing around the conversation. Matt's position was marriage is a religious union to create offspring and people who want to be together and 1 arent man and woman or/and 2 dont want kids can have that same legal union without calling it marriage. Law stole the name marriage.
Did you check the video after the 2 hour mark? Joe spends a good half hour building a straw man on Matt Walsh's conservative view on marriage vs gay marriage. It's pathetic.
Joe can't argue for shit without relying on logical fallacies or exceptional hypotheticals for a general argument; it's like listening to a 90s teenager point of view. I don't think Joe has challenged his views since then, it's embarrassing to hear a grown man like him argue purely from emotional outrage. Dude is a Karen for any liberal views he holds.
Matt kicked his ass.
I didn't realize this was from 2022 until Matt said he only had 4 kids.
Haha
Back when Joe did not care about the woke mob…. Cant remember the last time he had a figure like Matt
😁
We need more people speaking up like Mr Walsh. You should be proud of the work you’ve done sir and your family should be too. Keep fighting the good fight. God fearing, hard working, law abiding citizens are on your side. Period
💯
Matt should stick to what he knows, which is politics and religion, and leave psychology and psychiatry alone. He doesn't really believe in either and that's just dumb. Even catholic church exorcists believe in mental illness.
Please Matt, we need a sequel "What is a baby?"
Yes!
Cool. Let’s test that. What’s a baby?
@@thinkitthrough8000 Human offspring.
@@thinkitthrough8000 a baby is a stage of animal development in which the animal is highly dependent upon its parent or parents for survival.
@@Consconservative so a baby puppy?
They need to redo this interview in the current political climate. It has only gotten crazier.
Totally!
What is a Banana?
Obama Identifies as a black man even though he is half white. Who says you cannot self identify your race? Rachel Dolezal got beef for it and she had to be cancelled
Isn't this episode 11 days old?
@@brettmuir5679 na, it is an old one uploaded to the library. Look at the show number versus his current show number.
I love the fact that as much as Joe pushed, Matt never really backed down.
Joe "Whatabout" Rogan
You mean when Matt Walsh pulled a random number out of his ass and Jamie had to correct millions down to a few thousand? If you are that far off with basic facts, you have zero business being anywhere close to this conversation. What a fucking dunce.
@jasonpopielarczyk7511 did you love when Matt thought that millions had been on therapy when it was thousands? He did a documentary and was off by many orders of magnitude. You failed your sanity check.
While I don't agree with Matt on THAT subject, I admired Matt's patience. Very impressive indeed.
@@TheFloridaBro BRO (my b) i dont think the average joe checks the numbers, why do u think people say shit with so much confidence lmao. they just hope they are right.
I was put on lupron as a kid for precocious puberty, I’m fighting my second rare cancer diagnosis in the last 16 years. I’m not likely to survive this time around and partly blame the lupron for my current situation. I really wish I could scream it from the rooftops and talk to people about this risk, I vividly remember how that drug made me feel, it made me feel so terrible both physically and emotionally. Please if you are a parent who has a kid who’s transgender and is considering “treatment” I beg you to consider what the drug can do to your child in the future.
Interesting, this is why we won't treat our daughter with medication for precocious puberty. I'm so sorry for your experience!
You will make it! God bless you for telling your story!
I think joe is speaking about individual people. Matt is speaking for the society as a whole.
Individuals are allow to not have children. But for society not having children is a detriment to society.
Some would argue that having fewer children would actually be better for society as a whole.
@@mgband Well no, because that is slowly eliminating the society.
We actually need to start having more kids otherwise our societies are going to collapse. Replacement rate has went down all over the world and some think part of the open border crap is to ensure we still hit replacement rate but idk it seems like a lot more than that.
@@mgbandyeah Japan is doing great…
@casmatori it's what we need. This is why we are fighting for resources, why there's so much crime, and so on. To many people to keep any type of control of.
Matt exposing this issue absolutely helped me snap out of the Bay Area/LA liberal brainwashing. I came back to Conservatism thanks to this nonsense. God bless.
The very god you can't prove exist and has these views, sure buddy
@crunchywashere3513 It's basic English terminology. It's basic biology. It has nothing to do with religion. Nice try though
@@tippsish Well, if it was that simple, why would gay people exiat ? Let alone trans ans everything that is "abnormal" ? And the fact that they exist is fine by me, and not by Matt. Why ? Because of the Bible
@@crunchywashere3513you can’t disprove it. But It can be proven that a person with certain chromosomes is a man.
Respect.
Originally aired November 6th, 2022.
Thank you!
Damn! Why haven’t they put that in the description! This is so confusing!!
Thanks for sharing though!!
Yes. Today Matt has 6 kids.
Great conversation about marriage. I converted to Catholicism to be married in my fiance's church. 15 years and 3 children later, he wanted a divorce. We got pregnant by choice, and one of the reasons for that choice is that we could afford 3 children with both of us raising them, and we could parent them together. When he divorced me, he left me to raise those 3 children alone. All 3 children are now grown and have mental health issues, both from their abandonment by their father, and because I needed to leave them home alone to work because my income was now all we had to pay housing costs, food, clothing, etc. It was too much for me to provide for them alone. I never wanted the divorce, but was forced to accept this life he chose for me when he decided to leave us. I 100% agree with Matt that divorce is too easy. Both parties should want it. If he was going to have to be unhappy in our marriage, maybe his unhappiness would have been much better than the damage done to these children who had to be raised in a single family household with the economic struggles and lack of supervision that single parent families have.
Well, a according to Jesus. Divorce is not recognized. So if your ex sleeps with anyone else he's an adulterer. He can't marry again either. However YOU can marry again because he broke the covenant of Marriage which frees you.
I left this on when i ran to the store and now my cat is a conservative and has been telling me the benefits of converting to Christianity for the last hour.
So your cat has a brain 😂
Haha 😂
Smart cat
What is a cat?
Please stop lying. We all know that your cat doesn't even like you and would never spend an entire hour talking to you.
This 'thing' wasn't shut down fast enough. Now we struggle with the monster.
The lesson; Speak up people.
Same with all the Covid craziness.
Godless society.
Another lesson: don't tolerate obvious nonsense from degenerates.
@@6DarthSion9 Always been a Godless society because, unlike Trans people, God doesn't exist.
Things to google:
What was the trangender capital of the world in the 1930s
What religion has 6 genders?
Things to ponder:
What motive would a group of people have to sterlize Americans?
Did Germany really just go crazy in 1930-1950?
Is there a group of people who have a motive to hate Europeans because of their race?
nice to see a friendly calm debate between two respectable men
So who do you think won?
does that matter actually? i think this was a good conversation on its own and good points are made.
maybe judge the video on that fact instead of a winner/loser situation. @goon6932
@@goon6932 i actually don't have a bias. I'm a longtime Matt Walsh fan and although I agree with lots of his opinions, i also agreed with Joe most of the time here so. There's no winner, just a really good podcast
i would take joe rogan seriously if he wasn’t high out of his mind every day. matt walsh, thank you for being you and for being sober in mind. a true high value man.
Joe Rogan is a comedian. If you take him seriously on pretty much anything you’re a fool, sober or not.
On one hand yes very true. On the other hand he has a lot of serious conversations with serious professionals and seriously expresses his opinion and seriously has one of the largest podcasts in the entire world so naturally some people are seriously gonna take him seriously. I didn’t hear a lot of jokes in this conversation.
Sorry lol once I got going on repeating the word seriously it couldn’t stop myself
@@callsignfatbeard2637 yea because he also does comedy routines, nobody should take his opinions seriously.
@@pablohiteshew2457 he’s got a habit of not doing his research and getting fooled by fake shit on the internet all the time. He’s getting old.
Rogan smokes weed like once per month. People who smoke and/or appreciate weed arent always high out of their minds all day everyday. Some people smoke on the weekends. Some people do it once per month, like Rogan, last time I heard him speak about it. Stop generalizing
Glad to see that they are uploading all of these back onto RUclips.
Back? they were never here.
@@nik07nik Yes they were. Before the Spotify deal. Maybe not this specific one, and there are several that were done while Joe was only really on Spotify but all you could usually find on RUclips were things on the clips channel. It is nice to see Joe's podcasts back on RUclips.
@@mynamejeff4883This one was originally on RUclips. I've reached a point at hour and a 1/2 in realizing I heard this before and I can't believe I stumbled upon your conversation here By the way, I just googled it a little while ago and yes, this was from 2022.
@@mynamejeff4883 Yes!!!!!!
The original air date should be in the description
I clicked “more” and scrolled down to the bottom and saw the release date of nov 6, 2022
total control
This is still incredibly relevant.
It is. Maybe it's time to put the m3th pipe down.
I think it's some hack reposting these podcasts to RUclips off Spotify... They do it to Mr Ballen as well ..
I absolutely love that there was a debate on a sensitive topic and both men remained gentmanly (not a word) and cordial. This is something we need to see more of in the political and professional arenas. Great work!
To think there are people in this world who would argue that an 18 year old didn't understand student loans and can't possibly be trusted with a beer, but a 5 year old can determine their gender.
Very interesting commentary on marriage. Thanks Joe for having the courage to host these type of discussions. Props to Matt for being able to so clearly explain his position.
Shame his arguments didn’t follow logic and joe exposed the gaping holes in his backwards, religiously dogmatic thinking
Although I understand your sentiment, what kind of world are we in whe we have to "thank" someone for stating obvious facts?
They seem to have a disagreement on what the fundamental purpose of marriage is. Joe seems to think it's about individual happiness and matt seems to think it's about the way individual relationships and society interact to make a stable environment to raise kids. Both are right in their own sense
@@aaronflynndevereux1832it’s the liberal worldview (individual Liberty, personal happiness) vs the conservative worldview (societal stability and cohesion, tradition and connection).
@@aaronflynndevereux1832 agree, it's the order in which they view it. Joe thinks a marriage solidifies a loving bond between 2 people, who are then in a position to have a baby. Matt thinks you decide to reproduce and so get married to provide a stable environment in which to raise a baby. Joe doesn't regard the desire for baby-producing as a pre-requisite for marriage.
For anyone wondering why this got uploaded now? this is an old episode? Etc.
They are uploading the great majority of the back-catalog on RUclips again.
Prob has to do with signing the new Spotify deal Joe did several months ago.
ok thanks. This is what i was thinking.
Spotify exclusivity is over. It's that simple.
Thanks
Yes Spotify wouldn't upload the more "controversial" episodes. More censorship.
Good that they release the episodes. But I think it should be clear in the title that this was from years ago.
Thank you so much for giving Matt Walsh a voice! This is pivotal to break this spirit on world. It's helping us stop the tailspin we're in.
Got to give Joe and Matt credit for being able to have a reasonable discussion on points that they very firmly disagrees with and be able to come out at the end disagree and be civil about it, the world needs more of this we're allowed to disagree and still be civil!
Noah Webster's 1884 dictionary defines marriage as "the act of uniting a man and woman for life; wedlock; the legal union of a man and woman for life." It emphasizes the legal and lifelong union between a man and woman.
@@TheTexasBoys great for 1884, what's that matter now?
@@TheFloridaBro There is no justification for changing it now, and no authority to do so. Unlike the approach taken today where a cabal of ideological nitwits changes the definitions of words in online dictionaries on a whim, to suite their ideological predilections, the original compilers of dictionaries worked diligently to clarify definitions that expressed the observable and documented meaning of the word as used in society. They took their role seriously.
@mepatton an appeal to definition for a cultural construct like marriage is the lowest form of argument you could make, if it can even be called an argument. That was the definition in 1884 for those particular, very serious men. Their definition doesn't extend to the infinite future.
@@TheFloridaBro You're entirely wrong. The definition laid down in 1884 was mostly definitely NOT "the defition for those particular, very serious men," it was the OBSERVABLE RECOGNIZED DEFINITION of society as far back as they could document it. You demonstrate no comprehension of how dictionaries came to be, and no awareness that the English speaking world is not the only society which has recognized what marriage is. You will not find any significant different in the understanding of what marriage is in any society in the history of the world, regardless of the language they spoke. Marriage isn't a "cutural construct" as you #RegressiveleftistDipshits use the term. It is an observed action ("to marry") and an observed state of being ("marriage"). No one sat down one day and made up what they thought it should be at the time; both the act and the state of being predate written history and are present in all civilizations.
@@mepattonin 1884 the word gay meant something totally different also.
I think Joe doesn’t really buy that the family unit is the basic building block for society to be good. Having a high quality society is not valued these days maybe because we have not experienced it recently.
The family is the fundamental building block of the society. Society is the larger family. If the society is not a single family, it is low-quality. A fractured society is a larger, fractured family. Families are a form of social embedding as old as evolution itself. Social embedding is a prerequisite for a high-quality society of any lifeform we are familiar with. Unfortunately, the enemies of all-human potentiation figured out a simple trick: convince children their parents are ignorant perpetually by embedding subtext in family-focused media (cartoons, children's edutainment films, holiday films, social dramas, etc.), by redirecting their interests away from the norm perpetually by funding novel socio-political constructs (feudalism, industrialism, communism, capitalism, techno-feudalism, etc.) The modes of governance are shifted generationally and intentionally to perpetuate the permanent disabling of families emerging from poverty or providing legitimate socio-economic instruction across generations. It is an old technique, as old as society itself, but the majority are too plugged in to the constructs to figure the totality of the system out.
I desperately want Joe to interview Rosario Butterfield. It would be highly in the religious camp side of things, but boy would we get a phenomenal episode to watch.
Bring Matt back for a another conversation Joe!
What more is there to talk about?
@@ShimonFrankel Updates. Plenty of things. Cmon now. That's what makes joe Rogan podcast #1. He brings people back for more conversations.
@@ShimonFrankelThe usual stuff of course. UFOs, conspiracies and cults etc... it would be great to see Matt and Joe discuss the legitimacy of Bigfoot identifying as non binary.
I love how intelligent and pragmatic MEN speak with eachother. There is a certain type of respect and accountability that makes the conversations blossom and become very contemplative. Each participant is evolving mentaly right in front of your eyes
That’s what I was just thinking. I sent this to my son as an example of good conversation.
❤
Men remain civilized with other men because with every interaction there is a threat of violence, so typically they will both maintain their composure
Except when Joe expects Matt to answer for an entire religion. He have never treated a Muslim this way on the show.
@@lisareiter5368great idea 🙏🏻
This was such a DEEP AND POWERFUL conversation. I love Matt Walsh and Joe Rogan. I am a Catholic Convert ex feminist
Matt is 100% correct about the marriage issue. Joe is clueless like usual
@@TommyGunz327 is not Catholic yet but I did include him in my Rosary Prayer today with Father Rocky on Relevant Radio❤️🙏 I am asking Our Lady’s Intercession for his conversion. He is a good hearted man and seems just on the edge of realizing that he has a desire for a Faith Life. God changes hearts…I WAS a liberal and in my conversion to Catholicism I truly understand the disorder a mysogyny underneath homosexuality (I was bisexual and through conversion as well as Jungian type work I totally have been healed of same sex attraction)…see Mario Bergner’s book “Setting Love in Order” and Leanne Paynes book “The Broken Image”. Gay men were either molested/ or absent father/ overbearing mother…there is always a deep family of origin issue or molestation (even with Lesbians). In Lesbians there is some mother hunger absence of maternal love absence of father too.
@@TommyGunz327really? How so?
Based. I'm a Baptist but I agree with that.
@@TommyGunz327 Joe took the pride month to heart 🤣
I wish the film was on public places for those extremely misinformed people this film is aimed for. Love your work Matt 🫶
Matts not in the business of informing people. He's in the business of making money by talking about things that he is entirely unqualified to talk about.
I truly appreciate when a conversation can be exactly that, a conversation even when the views are different. No one is screaming. Open to a variety dialog. This is how people should discuss issues. If only.
Marriage has never been looked upon in any society throughout history as merely a construct of Man, it has always been seen as a creation of God and Nature and merely recognized as such by Man.
This is so fundamental it defies any disagreement.
It is because man and woman alone carry the procreative potential that marriage has been seen as the building block of society.
It is a new thing to say now Marriage is a lifestyle choice based on individual feelings.
A formal acknowledgement of a gay union might be a good thing, but it can never replace the purpose of Marriage for society.
This is a fundamental change in the way society has been ordered since recorded time.
We will, as Matt suggests, see in time what this change has yielded for society and our civilization.
The whole second half of this podcast really put on display how joe is only able to see reality through a hedonic lens.. from devorce, to the choìce of childless union, to people prefering same sex relations... everything he said was on wants and feels... total hedonism. Marriage is duty not choice. Sex for pleasure is an immoral selfish act. No one is born gay, some kids just never have their narcissism checked by a strong father and a loving mother in a proper marriage and so they come up with warped perceptions of sexuality and self to societies detriment.
Once it gets to that point though, the source of degradation will likely be skewed and/or ignored completely by the majority. Not trying to be a negative nelly, it's been a pattern of human history to twist said history for one's own personal gains
Conservatives were laughed at/derided for saying the legalization of gay marriage was the beginning of a slippery slope. And here we are. Once gay people achieved their goal, they had to figure out where to turn their attention and funds. They chose trans rights, although many gays are either unaware of that or furiously backpedaling away from that.
Its not that clear cut. The idea of marriage that we have today came in through christianity. Roman law, greek law, asian law, ancient egyptian law -- they were all different. Marriage in roman and greek terms had nothing to do with love. In fact, up until the middle-ages the very idea that you married for love was regarded as absurd. Your parents picked for you, often in a strategic way to join families and obtain wealth. So the idea of romantic or "love" based marriage is a relatively new notion. Christianity did not care about the love aspect either until the age of the chivalry. People really need to read history, including the darker aspects
@@CipherDiazindeed. That is the individual level it affects. The societal is less children. We are living that out heavily at this point. The west is well below replacement level at this point. The need in a society to at minimum keep replacement rate cannot be understated. This is why couples that marry and don’t have children actually do hurt other people. The economy suffers, the social programs become more burdened, the next generation of workers disappear and on and on. Then amplify those problems even further by saying anyone can get married and it doesn’t matter at all. The two same sex cannot naturally have children and that won’t help. Then if they do decide they want children they will have to use surrogacy or something. In this method they are intentionally depriving the child of either the actual mother or father. In some cases both. (This is especially egregious as a child has a right to be raised by their biological mother and father. Does that always play out, unfortunately not. In cases where the parents did something to lose those rights for the safety of the child or something. However as a society we shouldn’t start with that.) And that is all to fulfill their desire to have kids. A good thing in it itself but done in the most selfish way possible. Certainly marriage as it has historically been defined is better for everyone it impacts.
I don’t agree with Walsh in all subjects, but he is a great man fighting for a great cause! He speaks for all the people who can’t for fear of losing one’s livelihood
Matt is pretty smart on most topics…except for saying fat people are gluttons and food can’t be addictive. I have seen too many RUclips videos of people who lost weight once they gave up carbs.
@@lisareiter5368 well fat people a lot of the time are gluttons. if people are able to stop at some point then it means it's a choice
My father would always tell me “silence can make a man speak” just nod and listen when someone talks and they will tell you a lot, maybe more than they intend
I always enjoy JRE content, and while this episode wasn't the most exciting guest for me, I cannot express how impressive it is to watch two people with starkly different ideals on a very controversial subject have an open and calm debate. This was a masterclass on how more people should behave within differences.
Official Rogan quote “people shouldn’t be expected to stay married for life” lol Joe, that’s what he’s talking about.. Marriage doesn’t matter anymore, he’s explaining why that’s happened.. And yea, if you make a contracted commitment to a marriage, it should be hard to get out of..
It used to be hard to get out of as recently as the 50s and 60s. You were shunned by your close society. It caused misery for everyone involved - those who stayed in loveless cohabitation, kids growing up with parents who hate each other or live in fear of their parent, and those who were ostracised by their church and village/society. We changed divorce laws for the better
Gay marriage has only been legal in the US for less than 20 years so explain the increasing divorce rate and other things they discussed before it was legalized. Marriage may not mean as much as it used to but I highly doubt gay marriage caused as much of that problem as Matt is saying. Realistically it’s the lack of thought before actually getting married and then the easiness of modern day divorce.
People sometimes get into marriages that turn out to be incredible abusive... at the very least, it should be easy for people to get away from that.
@@gurugru5958 I don't know why people say this like it's some kind of own. Most hardcore stay-married-for-life advocates acknowledge the "Three As" as acceptable reasons for divorce: abuse, addiction, adultery. What is being criticized is no-fault divorce, where neither of the above are present.
@@sameash3153 Yeah, I can agree with that.
On marriage I don't get why Joe keeps going back to "well it's their choice." Matt's whole point is "it's not good for society." There are a whole lot of personal choices that everyone can make which will lead society to absolute ruin, and the vast majority of them would not effect you personally in the immediate.
Gay marriave will lead t0 "societal ruin"? 🙄
Because it’s their choice. You have no actual proof that is bad for society. Most marriages could be argued as bad for society. So should the government evaluate each and every single potential marriage to see whether we will be harmful and be the ones to decide whether it can happen? Why do you want more government oversight and tyranny?
No, I don't have a problem with gay marriage, but I do believe that's where the slippery slope began and that there wasn't a line drawn ever since.
100% agree jow ruined the conversation on the topic
That's the beauty of your personal political beliefs. I"m a centrist, libertarian but right leaning libertarian and while I think it's wrong to teach this gendered confusion to children, if you are an adult in a same sex relationship, and want to get married, then you should be able to get married. I"m all for people being treated respectfully and equally unless they give me, or society as a whole a reason not to treat them respectfully or equally.
Crazy how quickly this episode turned from both Matt and Joe seemingly being 100% on the same page, to having completely opposing viewpoints. While I don't agree with Matt's position on marriage, I can certainly appreciate the respectful dialogue and maturity between the two of them. Props to them both.
The debate on marriage was really good. Its one of the rare debates where even though I may agree a little more with one side, both Joe and Matt articulated their arguments well.
Matt Walsh is a true inspiration and love his work with the Daily Wire. Fantastic episode!
Matt is a clown at best
@@crunchywashere3513 No, I don't always agree with him. But, he is very serious about his convictions and for the most part they are based on sound reason and data. Clown is the last descriptor you could append to such a person.
@@crunchywashere3513yes, when I think of clown I think calm, rational person with consistent values who can articulate them well in an even tone of voice
Quite interestingly EVERYTHING Joe Rogan said to defend homosexuality is what Trans advocates use to defend transgenderism. It’s quite remarkable that each generation is swept up by something new with the EXACT SAME SENTIMENT, P3dophilia 🔜
@@crunchywashere3513how so?
The definition of "marriage" that Joe proposes here is actually the definition of "Civil Union." The two are not interchangeable because they have different origins and purposes. Matt is 100% correct on this - even if he couldn't quite articulate it in this session.
Marriage is the recognition of spiritual AND legal union - coupled with the expectation and opportunity to form a new family unit.
A civil union is the recognition of two individuals who love eachother and want to dedicate themselves legally to that coupling.
There is a REASON that gay people want "mariage" and not "civil union" - and that's the connotation that the term brings -- To set out on a journey of building a family together and becoming parents for the next generation is such a big deal to human beings (since time immemorial) that we have always gone out of the way to celebrate these unions in a big way.
A civil union doesn't get the same treatment societally because it is, literally, just designed for the happiness of those involved. It brings with it no such glorification, because it's not a proclamation of one's willingness to further the species and/or participate in societal customs. It's just two people saying "this one's mine."
The problem, as Matt tried to explain, is that modern society has completely lost touch with this fact - and is treating them interchangeably. The result is that marriage as an institution has been degraded of all of it's value and is treated identically to civil unions - The only noteable difference now is that mariage comes with a few extra legal benefits.
More and more young people are so disillusioned / removed from greater society and no longer see the value of marriage. Young men especially, since signing those papers essentially gives the women absolute control over their lives - with the opportunity to ruin them entirely and walk away scot-free.
When marriage is degraded to "just a legal document" that "says you love eachother," more and more young people are asking "well...why is that needed then? Why sign my life away unnecessarily?"
Yeah, I was little bummed at Matt's response here. Definitely lacking. I thought he'd have a better grasp and response than that.
You articulated this very well! I agreed with Matt Walsh on every point he made but it seemed like there was a bigger point that he was trying to get across that he just couldn’t find the words for.
Excellent. I was thinking about this while watching the episode.
Wow! That last part was a little rough. I was married for 16 years, was narcissistically abused, and when I finally escaped, left 3 business that we had built together, a new house on an acreage, boat, cars, trucks, RV's, etc. I got no cash, no alimony, no child support. Our daughter and I were homeless for two years while I dug us out of the hole. So no, marriage is not a contract that allows a woman to ruin a man and take all his stuff.
@@cayceesmith2650 yes it is.
What I think Matt failed to say: marriage was initially intended to be within the confines of the Church. The government adopted it legally to monopolize and incentivize with tax breaks. More government intervention.
As far as everything else, moral relativism leads to a “freedom” of chaos and hedonism.
I can’t believe in my thirties I’m a guy who rewatches podcasts 😂
Saying you are 5 when you are 38 is less crazy than a man saying he is a woman. At least sometime he was 5 and knows what being 5 feels like. You can’t say you feel you are a woman’s because you like the color pink and fashion shows. I don’t understand women who are in favor of this.
Doing this only serves to demean and diminish the real significance of being a woman to frivolous, material ideas.
Thank you Matt for graciously standing firm.
I thought this is why Matt's podcast was on hold for a few days, and then recognized the #1895 episode counter, and joes almost at 2200. We Definitely need an update.
My favorite episode. Matt Walsh speaks the truth. Every parent in Portland needs to watch "what is a woman"
How do you know what he's saying is "truth"? Because you agree with him?
Yes
Especially those parents than don't understand that Portlandia is intended as a comedy.
@@TheFloridaBroit's biological fact. How do you know you're human?
@@johnv6806 I understand the principle, but there is more of a social element to how people choose to present themselves. There is such thing as a biological woman, and there is such thing as a trans woman. Trans species might not be too far behind, depending on how technology/biological sciences advance.
I know they always switch around, but the Matt Walsh ARMS AGAPE is the greatest thumbnail EVER
Amazing conversation … made me query my own perspective and that is never a bad thing. I applaud you both for the platform and space you gave each other to discuss a delicate and nuanced subject 👏👏
we definitely need another pod with matt 🔥
Hate to see Joe using ‘she/her’ for a man. Matt has it right.
Weird how he can acknowledge how the movie shows the insanity of the position but then Joe also plays ball.
Sweet baby gang come on!
GAAAYYY…
@@jflesh8673how … dare you… insult thy sweet baby gang!? We will find you. 😢
@@acousticdoomfolkrock it’s the gayest thing you can refer to yourself as and it’s Matt Walsh..
😆is Matt the sweet daddy? Who came up with that? I’m not here to tease anyone but that’s awfully gay
@@robertfrancois6064it’s just an awesome troll
Super important discussion. Transparency and Truth is ALL that matters and its worth fighting for.
The way they both talked about the left at the beginning reaffirmed my right view, the second half of the podcast reaffirmed my left views😂
Dude I'm getting chills listening to this... So glad we have people like Matt big fan had to catch this episode.
Kids and humans have never before in history had so much access to " mental health care".. and yet it's getting worse. This should scream volumes
@swampypolitics9574 kids and humans? What a strange set of categories lol.
@@TheFloridaBro as in kids, the main point. And humanity in general.
Did you forget how expensive healthcare is in the USA? If you don’t have insurance good luck getting help you need.
@@AlCapwnd-tb5ow Obama care bro
@@TheFloridaBro just because you qualify for Obama care doesn't mean we all do
What a fantastic conversation between two people with different belief structure. I love it. Society needs more of this!
Matt is so well spoken, his way of explaining with a dry sense of humor just gets my goat
A lot of people don't get his humor. Like the time he off-handedly and hyperbolically called anime 'satanic' all kinds of news outlets were railing against him over this obvious joke. And it's Matt, so once they started attacking him on it, he doubled and tripled down.
Matt Walshes documentary should be put into school systems
It was better than I thought it would be. Funny, tragic, scary
Statute of limitations for medical malpractice in most states is 2 years. The high being 5 years. If the statute of limitations was raised. Especially for minors so they have a solid decade after they turn 18… and absolutely NO doctors would do hormones, puberty blockers, or surgery on minors.
The problem is that it isn't "malpractice" to do a transition surgery or medications. These are procedures that are fully legal for the doctor to do, and as long as the end results are technically correct, then it isn't "malpractice." If the puberty blockers blocked puberty exactly as intended, if the surgery went as expected and was performed correctly, then it isn't "malpractice." From a legal standpoint, that is.
From a moral standpoint, it is evil, ritual mutilation in the name of Satan, and should absolutely be stopped, not just in minors but in adults as well!!
I said what I said. 🤨
THIS!
@@ericsmith1508 let’s make it malpractice then 😎
That’s a great point.
@@ericsmith1508That is factually incorrect. When treating a patient you have to have to determine: the right patient, right medication/procedure, the right dose, the right time right route. This is typically used for medication administration but is true for any aspect of the medical system. Deviation from it does constitute malpractice. You can't suggest that A: a child can consent to any of this, or B: that a practitioner is not liable for their actions that have long term harm so long as they did their buchery well.
Matt Walsh seems like a real thrill to be with
JR always has the best guests. Thanks for always pursuing the truth
This is a great conversation by two thoughtful people and no hatred. Thank you both.
The more sense that Matt makes, the deeper Joe has to spin some hypothetical that represents a tiny insignificant minority. This is the most obnoxiously bleeding heart Joe has ever been. I’m shocked he didn’t start crying.
no, I don’t see this happening at all.
You have to remember Joe is a Progressive, a huge Bernie Saunders supporter.
Now draw the parallels to te COVID vaccines - no long term studies, don’t ask questions, you’re either on the right side or the wrong side
Great interview! “six genders and no personality” 😂
I started crying
3:04 Thank you Joe for your maturity and example of civil discourse.
Good thing this is a rerun, I thought Matt was actually wearing the exact same shirt for a sec lol
1:15:13: The only time Matt Walsh has been captured laughing on video.
😁
😂
Cursed! 😄
Marriage has become more of a legal status for taxes and protections under the law than a sacred union between two people. Society is slowly devolving.
Do you know why the tax incentive is there?
Orwellian nightmare now...
Genuine marriage stopped existing well over 30 years ago if you didn't notice.
The discussion about marriage was very good imo. It's so refreshing to see two opposing viewpoints have a civil discussion/debate about something. Regardless of your opinions on the topic it was nice to see Joe and Matt hash it out without anger.
Why was this episode removed from Spotify? I can’t find it anymore
1.3k 7 days. They are trying to withhold this gem from the masses
It doesn't show up at the top of the page. I had to search for It.
It's because youtube unbanned a bunch of these older videos and put them back online.
@@michael5432 and u have the facts for that?
like can we stop repeat this...be glad its on YT and spotify
@@d3m0bst3r_swe what?
Amazing conversation and glad RUclips added this back onto the site, the people need to see this
I feel like Matt lost himself a bit trying to explain the whole marriage thing, but I think I got what he meant. It's all about definition of the marriage institution. One could say it's a "loving union between a man and a woman in order to stablish a family by having children". So having children is recommended, because that's what marriage is for, but you can opt to have it without doing it. It's like buying a knife. A knife is for cutting. You can opt not to cut with it, but cutting is it's function. Now, if you call any sharp metal object a knife, soon you will be trying to cut your food with a hoe, and weed your yard with an axe.
2 men I love to listen to and respect...and this is another reason to respect them!!
This is how 2 people who disagree sit and have a discussion
Joe and Matt are two of my favorites! ❤
One of my favorite JRE episodes.
Wow I never would have guessed that I was a year older than Matt. Good on him for being as successful and mature as he is
The second half seemed like an interview for Matt's future doc called: "What is a marriage?"
to control the speech is to control the mind
Someone should write a book about that... They could call it, Speechless: Controlling Words Controlling Minds
@@samanthajardim there are many books that cover the subject, it's quite simple the way it works. Sort of like the elephant and the string, if you are familiar.
@@imjustadrummer I was being silly, Michael Knowles wrote a book about it called Speechless: Controlling Words Controlling Minds and he mentions it regularly on his show.
@@samanthajardim huh, I've seen a few of his shows and I had no clue! woosh! lmao!
@@samanthajardim🛎️
I loved this so much! An intelligent, civilized conversation just like back in the good old days.
The love and positivity here is overwhelming. God bless you all!
What Joe calls marriage and what Matt calls marriage are two different things.
I understand both sides. Matt is explaining the reason marriage exists while Joe is explaining why people want to marry. Both correct in their own way.
Joe Is NOT a Texan.
That's because the true definition of marriage isn't clear. Unless you're speaking of the legal aspects
@@edjackson4389 No it is perfectly clear. It is just people outside of the religious context in which it should remain, don't believe the sacramental value of it.
Have your civil unions, I have nothing against that, but to call them marriage... is pushing it.
@@mitchc3569I was slamming my head against the wall listening to Joe explain what he thinks marriage is
Matt Walsh one of the most censored in YT, I had to look for this episode because I heard it was uploaded, otherwise I would have never known it was here.
YT recommended it to me. Otherwise i probably would never have watched it.
All his stuff shows up in my feed regulary.
I rarely watch Joe's stuff yet YT recommended it to me. Also what else did you expect by not subscribing!!?
@@beach2787 I am subscribed to JR and MW I got to this particular episode by looking for it specifically and that's my point.
Wrong, his entire podcast is being uploaded by Daily Wire.
Two people that are so amazing and kind.
I don't usually git damn I could listen to Matt talk all day long! He just knows how to say what needs to be said! Come to AZ Matt I don't drink anymore but I'd have a beer with you!
I love how honest matt walsh is
It’s so refreshing
Just a few minutes in and I love that he calls him Bruce.
@@bradgilbert6718did Matt call Joe Bruce, or the other way around? I didn’t catch that.
@@celebritarianhe called caytlin Jenner Bruce 😂
@@AlexStein-q3dbased Matt
Matt walsh is great!
Rare in these times that people can have a discussion about contrarian views without it getting contentious.
I love Matt Walsh 😂 His show Judged was outrageous
7:21 How much you want to bet the foster father was SAing the foster kids.
A lot of foster kids were abused in their previous homes and never adjust to a stable home.
This was my first thought too
I'm on Matt Walsh's side.
How healthy to see two adults who disagree strongly on fundamental topics have a healthy debate without drama. This is how we should be interacting with those we disagree with. Composure, maturity and understanding.
I've never seen Joe refuse to let a guest answer questions and take up so much of the time arguing for his own agenda and perspective. Matt got badgered with shotgun style questioning and projections onto him of positions he does not hold. This podcast built a reputation for allowing guests to speak at length on controversial subjects so that deep critical thinking can occur. That did not happen here. Joe kept changing the focus in conversation, apparently, in total fear of hearing and/or allowing an opposing view to be clearly stated. Matt Walsh deserves another interview in which he's actually allowed to answer questions.
24:10 What gets me is the outright hatred of self. The touted line is that this movement is about embracing yourself, but in practice what we’ve seen is the utter objection to oneself to the point of lifelong pain & suffering. As if outward projection is a cure all for suffering that began inside. As if we as humans are not our ((entire)) organism, but just a culmination of ideas. It truly is madness and while I lean towards compassion, I refuse to enable this self hatred.
I went into my local supermarket. I asked. "What is a shopping cart?" The other shoppers became triggered and started screaming at me. I had to leave. The shopping carts in the parking lot started chasing after me. I have been stalked by shopping carts ever since. Thanks, Matt Walsh.
Just don't ask "what is a hotdog" you will be sued left and right by the food manufactures.
@@benfaubion Or what is peanut butter... that could get you FDA censure.
One of Joe's best podcasts/interviews I've watched in awhile.
I have a patient that is a corrections officer in NY and she told me at the women’s prison she works at they estimate the population is almost 20% men. She was in an altercation with a male trans pretender and durning the confrontation words were exchanged and she told me afterwards she was pulled aside by her supervisors and scolded for misgendering the inmate.
Joe nailed Matt on the marriage subject, you can tell simply by how much Matt is stammering through that part of their conversation. I love that Joe can agree on one part of a discussion and then disagree with another part of a discussion he has with his guest in a fair and pragmatic manner. He doesn't follow a narrative, or "take sides".
actually he is a liberal and he probes and question conservatives more than he probes anybody. And I don't like the easy to fool attitude he have when he have guest that question Christianity. He doesn't even check their basic claims and believe it is true which frustrates the listeners who have some basic idea of the subjects.
Joe keeps asking "what's the damage to a straight relationship because of a gay relationship" Matt Keeps answering "the damage I'm talking about is to society and the safe and best environment for child rearing NOT to my existing marriage or any other individual relationship" then Joe obviously doesn't listen and just asks the same question again...
Yes - Matt looks Big Picture not his own personal inconvenience
@@ThePossumone Exactly and if you look at countries and cultures doing better than America they are all traditional, homogenous, and in so many ways, if not completely, culturally opposite of America. And as America has become more secular and progressive we have declined. The irony is every country progressives point to as superior to America, their cultures are the exact opposite of America and often Catholic. And they love brown and/or Muslim cultures that are radically traditional, which is what they despise about America. Their cognitive dissonance is epic.
@@nedhill1242 interesting isnt it how deceived people can be
@@ThePossumone
It proves how easy it is to brainwash people. I’m 58 years old. People I went to college with back in the 80s would never ever have been on board with today’s radical agenda back then. But now whatever the Democrats tell them to think they rabidly defend. They love to mock conservatives and libertarians as being brainwashed, but we actually believe in objective truth, science, reality, data, science. They are the ones that believe things that are objectively false. We can prove what they believe is factually incorrect. But they still will not change their mind. It’s literally 1984 and precisely as Yuri Bezmenov described.
During pride I I got into fights on Instagram with very radical & privileged very attractive white women in their 20s and 30s. They loved saying go away old white man. And of course they arrogantly thought they were being funny and profound. I would immediately point out that they have a soft privileged life thanks to old white men. Everything they use and enjoy daily and take for granted was invented by an old white man. They have the right to vote because of old white men. They have freedom thanks to old white men. The reason they can even have a pride parade and the rights enjoyed by homosexuals today is because of old white men. So show some respect & appreciation.
The combination of the media selling out to the far left and the radicalization of the public school system by way of teachers union is what got us to where we are today.