FX9! In general I want to switch to Sony as Canon are just too slow with upgrades and updates. Thank you for all the value and for the shout out on your LIVE to my country, South Africa. I appreciate you big time :)
Really thorough video Mark! I would say it really matches your style of final image after coloring a bit more (moodier, darker, etc) But, I think the canon is still the better choice in image quality. Also, I know the ergonomics work better for someone who doesn't primarily do handheld/shoulderstyle shooting primarily. Finally yes, canon sucks at slowmo, but I'm a big believer that 60p and above is waaaayyyy overdone now so overcrank for me is not a big deal.
Mark's decision makes sense based upon his situation. It's the same for all of us. If you have clients who like and request Sony and don't ever care about shooting RAW, buy the FX-9. I had it for a month to write a review, shot three client projects on it, it's a great camera. If you have clients who are not really in the FS7 MKII/FX-9 demo and like the Canon look, buy the C500 MKII, it's an amazing camera as well. You could easily shoot any kind of programming on either of these incredible machines. The main differentiators for me would be glass owned (I own a dozen Canon EF mount lenses), whether or not you want to shoot RAW or your clients do (we have several clients who we shoot a lot of green screen for, they LOVE RAW) and your budget. S-Cinetone brings actual usable colors to the FX-9 straight out of camera and it's a lot cheaper than the C500 MKII. Just remember too, if RAW is a big factor for you and your work, the C200 has dropped to $6,500.00 and it is still 90% as capable as either of these cameras. Also, just an observation, FF is ok but nothing to make a buying decision off of. S35 is still 99% as effective for most types of filmmaking, I ran the FX-9 FF and S35 mode on my shoots and either worked really well. No reason to bad mouth anyone who buys either of these cameras or play brand fanboy, either of them are better than anything on the market under $16k.
Why don’t many of the more popular RUclips camera reviewers talk about the Ursa Pro G2 4.6k? Seems like it has a lot of the same features and a great price
Absolutely. I'm getting the BMPCC4K next, not because of the camera, but because I have a bunch of M43rds cine primes. The lenses all together cost much more than the body does.
@@BeaPhotographerlessons No I have the original BMPCC from 2012. It's got a great look, but mine is getting beat up. The mini hdmi connection entirely snapped off the board so I don't have that anymore for my monitor. And there are a few dead pixels in the display screen. None show up in the image, but it's getting old now. I still love the look of the image so I'll use it on certain projects, but it's tough doing client work when the see a janky camera like that :)
Just subbed bro...found you via Matti's channel and binge watched your vids. No disrespect to Matti, but you're my new fav filmmaker on RUclips! 🙂 You're crazy talented but also down-to-earth and you keep it real, and as an aspiring filmmaker also out of the 6ix, I've experienced first hand much of the stuff you talk about, so I know you know your shit. Your work is straight 🔥and an inspiration, especially the way you utilize your dark and moody look...I love shooting that style myself! Keep doin what you do brother! Oh, and FX9 for exactly the same reasons you mentioned...again, those who know, know!
The gyro stabilization is actually super powerful and one of the main reasons I'm considering the camera. If you check out some Catalyst test clips, you'll see that it's possible to replicate the look of gimbal or steadicam (if you use a fast shutter speed). I'd consider it a major win for short-form shooting like commercials. For long form, the additional render time is probably a deal breaker.
All I know is that it will only work with lenses that can supply metadata to the camera. So it won't work with vintage or manual lenses. But maybe off-brand modern lenses (Sigma, Tamron) will be ok. Catalyst applies lens distortion correction based on a unique profile for each lens, so it needs the lens to ID itself.
I still want a C500 but this video is super informative and gives a good list of stuff to ask canon to implement.. I appreciate reviews with facts like this one
I was honestly blown away with how much better the FX9 is from the FS7. I had two FS7's and used them all the time for all kinds of productions (when cine level wasn't an option). I agree with you about the lack of varispeed in 6K FF, it's a bummer but I'm glad they at least acknowledged it and are releasing through firmware. I've heard they're also allowing up to 120fps in 4k ProRes RAW which is extremely exciting. I'm really hoping to upgrade our cameras to these FX9's, happy to hear from another commercial director how they fair on real world sets. Thanks again for the very well done review!
@@markbone its crazy how big it is! I didn't know how much bigger it was over the extension Unit on the FS7 until i got mine... I like a large camera but its defiantly makes it huge!
@@markbone Using the shape handle extension, same style one that I used on my FS7 for years, think thats a must have, external small HD 703 monitor, Wood Camera EFV holder/arm and looking at getting the Wooden Camera V-mount accessory. Looks really nice and compact and allows you to still be able to have a sony batter in the camera itself so you could hot swap Vmount while recording. I have a bunch of the sony batteries but finding the FX8 definitely draws quite a bit more power then the FS7 so needing to swap batteries more often then I would like too, so Vmount on the back will help with that.
I love the image quality out of my Sony A7iii in 4K. When your settings are dialed in and focus is bang on the image looks so clear and cinematic. Nice video as always Mark ✌🏻
If by some chance you actually get to read my comment I’d like to ask a question please? I really don’t like the 120p on the Sony A7iii. I shoot with a Sony 16-35 f2.8 GM. If I were to shoot with a Sony Prime, do you think I’d see better results at 120p? Thanks mate.
One thing I’ve found with Sony 1080 is to shoot with a shallow depth of field. With the lower bitrate it will render better images if everything isn’t in focus. So a fast prime lens or shooting on the 35 end will render best results
Love to hear the different perspective of these cameras. They seem to compete but they still doesn't compete because they have their own focus on specs and handling the camera. I would choose Canon C500 because of the form factor and raw internal. Also because I like to manual focus with canon lenses 😅
Great video Mark...I’ve shot quite a bit on the c500 Mark ii and made a few videos about it. Thanks for the real world review of the fx9. Looks to be an interesting camera.
@@markbone lol I'm looking for a run and gun camera (currently on an a7iii and love the hybrid features of it), that I could take on tour with artists and document on the fly handheld. So a rig that is quick is important to me. For that what would you recommend, FS7 or FX9 or neither lol?
That autofocus sound is just the Sigma 18-35. They all have noisy autofocus and it is the ONLY flaw in that lens - other than that, one of the best pieces of glass you can put in your bag (unless you're a full frame shooter).
1991ClarkJames sometimes I do. Older lenses often have more interesting bokeh. Typically though if I’m gonna shoot a commercial I would try and rent something like the Canon K35
i started on the f55 and even today having shot RED, Canon and Arri, i miss the f55 - it’s look, it’s simplicity. i got my hands on an Arri Alexa Studio - there’s a truck inside it i’m certain, but even at 2K it’s got a better picture than anything available. I also shoot with the Sony Z280 which has a lot of the features you love about the fx9- but obviously not full frame. the variable nd is insane - and putting it on auto leaving f1.9 is like being spoiled. great real world look - and great commercials. cheers
I've never felt like cropping in 120p was a big deal (assuming you're not losing resolving ability, which at 1080p you're not). If I want slow motion, it's usually because I want to highlight detail, so it's nice to be able to get closer to the action without changing a lens. Nobody wants to shoot static wide landscapes in slow motion!! 😂 Having said that I do much prefer the FS7/FX9 to the C300mkII/C500mkII for other reasons.
I really enjoy watching your vids... I am not a cinematographer by any mean or even close... but I enjoy all the info and insight you provide. It does help a lot. I actually laughed out loud with the school bus 30 ft and submarine 560 ft reference. Can't wait to see your next vid or be in the next live.
I've been doing some heavy research on the FX9 during all this lockdown and this is one of the best videos I've come across, real world use! - I think that lack of FF 4K currently is a bit of an issue, hopefully they don't take too long to get that update out.
Now that you've got two of them, you can build an office gym and use them for weightlifting as well! Might even throw in a C-Stand to function as a bar!
Great review Mark! Loved it. About the stabilization. I don’t personally own either of the cameras, but I’ve been watching a lot of YT videos on the topic and this guy did some tests on the C500mkII EIS with and without lens stabilization and honestly it looked pretty disappointing. Meanwhile I saw some tests using the FX9 and that software and it looked amazing. Stabilized the shots really nicely using the gyro metadata. They might implement that into DaVinci Resolve and maybe even Premiere at some point. All in all great choice and I hope it serves you well! 🤗
I rented both the C500ii and FX9. For me, the stabilization on the C500 was incredible; you can hand hold a 70-200 (non-IS) at 200mm and it looks completely stable. It's amazing. The FX9 stabilization software only works with a specific set of Sony lenses, and only if IS is turned off on the lens. So for me the C500 has a better implementation of stabilization technology, as it can also be used with PL lenses too, whereas the FX9 is much more limited. Both awesome cameras though, can't really go wrong IMO.
Thanks Mark, I liked this review, especially the double ISO - with clean 4000 iso signal and the no stepping ND, those are great useful features. Also the shots looked very nice and clean. I am doing some documentary work on a budget with my fuji XH1 but I enjoyed looking at the professional tools to learn what they have to offer over the standard mirrorless setups.
FYI a big reason why Sony doesn’t have internal raw on the fx9 is due to Red’s patent on internal compressed RAW recording. Part of the reason why the Venice records “xocn” but not “RAW”
Hey Great video. Lots of insights from a realistic and personal point of view; Just my 2 cents concerning the "iris wheel" problem you have with the C500 MKII. It's simple as hell, this can be deactivated (or set to any parameter such as iso or WB) in the dedicated assign button menu. And to change the iris then on you can use the wheel on the grip...
The electronic variable ND on the Fx9 only goes up to 7 stops. If you want 10 stops, to shoot f/1.8 in broad day light etc, you’ll need to add additional ND.
Thanks so much for the video. All great stuff but it would be so great if you could make a downloadable file of your footage even if its watermarked. Btw what are you putting in the matte box. Do you feel that the picture needs softening? Meanwhile thank so much and take care. Best K
Mark, appreciated your review! I am a five-year Sony FS7 vet and it’s been hard for me to justify the purchase of a camera that on the surface only seems to be moderately better than what I have. I shoot in slog3 and grade most projects in Resolve, so I’m already squeezing a ton of goodness out of my images anyway. Most of my clients are local/regional corporate clients that don’t see the quality difference between a Sony and an Arri, so how much better is the quality between the two, really? Is it really that much better? 10K in the middle of CV crisis for a cam that is basically a full frame FS7 with better low light performance might not be the best business decision 😜 Thx!
@@markbone 👍 Appreciate your channel. Keep it up! Too many youtubers out there with virtually NO pro experience doing reviews and tutorials. You're a BRIGHT spot on the interwebs!
Hi Mark, I am a FS7 owner but recently ordered the FX9. Out of curiosity, I noticed that you have a very clean set up. No Sony EVF (on FS7 and FX9) and no handle with magnifier, etc. How does it work for you like that? Using the Small HD, you need batteries, etc. I was thought the EVF of the FX9 was better? And the handle to me seems really practical, especially the magnify button...
I only use the arm when I’m on a easy rig or my shoulder. I hate all standard camera monitors (unless they’re made by RED) compared to a large size external monitor. I have an adapter that powers the monitor off the batteries but even so I don’t really care that if I need batteries, the image quality and my trust in the focus of an external monitor is just so much dang better the than the monitors that come default for Sony/Canon that I don’t mess around. Also too LUTS and False colour are so important for me. When you’re trying to DP and really understand the image you’re capturing I feel you need a good monitor, world of difference
@@markbone I like working with the Small HD bright 501, but I need to power it through my V mount battery, so I need the external unit. Are there any other solutions? One last question, I sometimes shoot with my metabones ultra adapter/canon 24-70L 2.8 Does the autofocus work with this combi on the FX9. Do you happen to know? Thanks. Nice work btw!
The noise of focusing is normal for some of the early lenses. I didn't go for FX9 while I noticed it does not support 4k 60fps in full-frame mode. Besides, no 444 or 4444 or raw is a bit disappointing, so I still keep my ARRI Amira, and waiting for the firmware update of FX9 or C300III published.
Have you ever tried a Blackmagic cinema camera? The Ursa Mini Pro G2 has crazy codecs, frame rates, and latitude. If you haven’t tried one I’d definitely recommend experimenting one for your next shoot or doing some test shots - the debate between Canon and Sony is old and a little restrictive. Pocket 4K is amazing as well
I've been impressed with the C500 MK II back when it was hiding inside of an unwieldy lunker called the C700. Putting it into a smaller, more affordable package makes it a no-brainer, but props to Sony for bringing excellent colors from their high end cinema cameras to a far more affordable option.
You pretty much nailed it when you said they design these in the lab, and not often with real DPs. Every camera has some design flaws, and Sony is no exception. But that lack of built full-frame 4k and not including raw is pretty much the nail in the coffin for me. I can get that in a sub $2K camera. Why is Sony being so obtuse?
I wish I had the sony FS7 I can't afford a camera like that I am working on a Project but I had to Barrow a camera for 2 days but it would be nice to own your own good video do you have any films on Netflix? If so what ones I would love to watch it
I have no business buying an FX9 (I'm a DIY youtube vlogger part time, my day job is something completely different) but I'm a junkie for incredible image quality. I'm mainly worried about size! Do you think it's possible to strip down the kit for portability?
Hey Mark just found your channel love the content! I have an FS700 with a Shogun 7 for external 4K footage I want to keep as a B cam would you recommend the FS7 Mkii as a primary or wait until the FX9 drops in price?
The cinetone looks really good! It's so hard to decide for a camera dude. Wanna purchase an entry cinema level camera soon and this could be a good option (even tho it's not entry-level haha). Still wanna wait if canon announces C300MIII or the Komodo.
The Sigma Art Lenses are ultra silent on a sony if you're using the native E-Mount. I also got the 35mm 1.4 EF-Mount on the Sigma MC-11 Converter for my A7III and the autofocus is noticeable loud and clicky. The native E-Mount lenses are also much smoother, during the autofocus
@MarkBone you are a straight G 👌... I like hearing your perspective on cameras and filmmaking because this is what you do for a living and you're not sharing this ever more common "youtube gear reviewer" POV which feels more like a sales pitch. You're an incredible filmmaker too!
wow how times have changed, i keep hearing film makers talk about autofocus or auto iris or autoND wtf happened, progress ??, i still dont have an auto lens, just clean primes, the FX9 or C500 neither one, last canon i had was XL1, and after the sony F900 sony went a bit off with colour, all cameras are good now, its the content thats overlooked ,,
Sony can't add internal true RAW recording due to RED's RAW patent. That's why Blackmagic's RAW is called "BRAW" and Canon's "Cinema RAW Light" and as I understand it - these RAW codecs are slightly compressed?
I’ve owned the C100 and C200 and never have I had an issue with the IRIS wheel on the front left and this is the first time I’ve heard someone complain about it. Now that the C300 mk iii has internal Raw, 4k 120fps with no crop, 2k 180fps and 422 standard, how would you compare them even tho you haven’t shot with it?
have fun with the fx9 turkey tail external raw. Has nothing on the c500 with pro res raw on atamos with dual autofocus. external rec and monitor in one unit with the atamos. c500 low light is sick, skin tones are sick, colors pop like a Warhaul commercial. Might wish I worked for Cannon but I don't.
I am an EPK DP in ICG669 amd we shoot on sony FS7 mostly and I have own a Sony A7Rii so all my glass is Sony/Zeiss collaboration of gmaster so I am hoping to get into an FX9 this year bit have been weary of the limitations I hear about.. thanks for the video..
interesting and useful comparison of cameras, with a lively and engaging tone and, most important, based on real usage. Do you think there is still a clear gap between high end cinema cameras, mid level cinema cameras like the FX9, and hybrid mirrorless ? Do you think you could shoot a documentary with sufficient quality on a xt4, or on the future eosr5?
yeah, dynamic range is king for me, and the high end cameras take the cake on that. Also, no one beats the Alexa colour science. Also yes you could shoot on one of those mirrorless cameras for a doc but audio is always the biggest hurdle and thats' why I don't mess with cameras that don't have XLR in unless they're my B-Cam
The built-Nd VND is way better than a double polarizing filtration system that often causes artifact. Sony system is an electronic and optical that has a crazy wide range and produces not color shit or artifact at all.
Thank you for your time to do this review. I can see your thoughts about Sony listening to filmmakers and Canons just creating products in labs. But as you said, also wish Sony had some more comparison resolutions and dynamic range as their competitors. But overall, such reliable products on some intense shoots in all kinds of environments.
I'm an Ursa Mini Pro fan here. Saw a lot of pros and cons, the variable ND is a huge unique factor! How would you say the FX9 compares to in image quality and in handling to the Ursa mini Pro 4.6k?
This was a very good insight! You have very good talent and seem to understand all the aspects of the camera, something I see in very few people that do this kind of work. I bet you're easy to work with too. Now i have a new name to look for.
I really enjoyed your video: right to the pint, succinct, clear and sincere. Do you think the FX9 could be use for narrative/fictional content? is it really too big the camera when you add the back?
Pablo Pucci naw it’s perfect for those. I have shot plenty with the back on my Fs7, I was just making a big deal about it to make a point about the extents you have to go to shoot RAW etc. It’s great for both doc and narrative
Thanks for the vid. Great review and sample shots. I've been contemplating between the FX9 and C500. I'm leaning more toward the Sony since I already have several high-quality sony Zeiss and GMaster lenses. The size and weight are important to me also. It actually doesn't look terrible and huge in your video stripped down and without the super-weird handle. I'm leaning a little further now towards the Sony.
Hi Mark, love your channel and your content. For someone like myself ( an aspiring filmmaker ) I find your reviews on kit and your general advice around filmmaking extremely helpful and encouraging. I wanted to ask your advice on something, I own and currently shoot with my Sony A7iii. I have managed to build up a pretty solid kit over the last few years of various native G-Master glass and have successfully used the A7iii on numerous narrative short film shoots and documentaries but I’m now looking at adding either the FS5 or the FS7 into the mix and I can’t decide which of these cameras would make the best sense in investing in. I have a very little experience of using the FS5 on a couple of shoots and although I never really fully put it through its paces, it felt and functioned brilliantly and was a real joy to use even from the simplicity of better ergonomics. I’m looking for an upgrade from the A7iii, but will keep the A7iii as my B camera. Which camera out of the FS5 or the FS7, in your opinion would be the better to go for? I intend to shoot more narrative short films, documentaries and branded content with whichever camera I go for. If you have the time to read my message and response I’d hugely appreciate it, but I also understand your probably hugely busy man. Thanks Mark Keep up the great work Best Neil
Mark - do you use FX9 rigged on the shoulder or only handheld? If so which rig do you use to keep it light as possible and with a balanced centre of gravity?
Really cool insight Mark! At your stage, would your clients feel 'cheated' if you were to shoot on something like an A7iii vs an Alexa or C500ii/FX9? Thanks!
Depends the client. If they’re paying lots, it’s nice for them to feel like were using cameras that justify the cost but they usually care more about final product
@@markbone so would you mainly say the reason you and other documentary-style filmmakers use these types of cameras is due to the dynamic range and better range in colour grading? Because other cheaper & lighter cameras also have 180fps 2k or 120fps 4k etc. Don't get me wrong, the fact that you were able to recover detail from the highlights and bring up the shadows internally is pretty impressive (my A7iii can't do that lol) but if you can't shoot internal RAW then is there much a gain? (law of diminishing returns at play here i guess haha)
It’s the compression/bit-rate and dynamic range. A7III footage falls apart when you try to pull back highlights but Fx9 is pretty sturdy. Did you watch the scene where I pulled back the information in the sky? You could never do that on the A7III
Great video Mark! In regards to the noise you hear with the Sigma art lenses with the Canon EF adaptor, it happens with all the Sigma lenses if you are using the adaptor but the native E mount Sigma lenses it does not. I did a test on the FX9 on a bunch of lenses and speak specifically to the Sigma lenses here ruclips.net/video/RspvZ6dMkbc/видео.html
Hi Mark, brilliant review. Ive just bought an fs7 and I have native full frame sony glass and Im looking for one lens that really fits the fs7. Would you go speedbooster and a 24-70 canon/tamron or sigma 18-35 f1.8 with normal adapter?
Hey mark so what is your work flow for when you shoot raw? Because as far as I know premiere doesn’t support raw? Or is it just pro res raw that it doesn’t support yet? Thanks for all the great content!
Just a question tho, is it your personal preference to have more green tones in ur videos? Skin looks greenish for sure but done in an artistic way. Im confused if it’s a sony problem or just ur style
If to choose camera for documentaries then Sony is a better option. But for set I would go with Canon. It's Raw, it's lighter, you can put it on a Ronin S. I prefer the Canon color science. Sony still looks videoish for me. Even Mark's color grading choice is terrible.
Do you have computer glasses you wear while editing? Night shift messes with the colors, so I don't ever turn that on. I was wondering if you had any recommendations on how to reduce eye strain.
Great informative video Mark! I also use a MC-11 adapter for my Sony with the 35mm 1.4 ART EF and it makes some noise on autofocus as well. I think it's just how the lens + adapter work together on the camera. My buddies 35mm ART E mount lens doesn't make any noise. Haven't found a fix though :P hope that helps!
Great review Mark! For the Kinobody footage, did you shoot in SLOG-3 or S-Cinetone? When I used the FX9 for my last video, I had a hard time using my Phantom Arri LUTS with SLOG-3 as I found the greens suuuuper green compared to FS7. Would love to know how you graded the Kinobody stuff! Thanks
I noticed you don't use cine lenses. Is there a reason why? Can you do a video about cine vs photo lenses. It seems like, if one doesn't use cine lenses is a not DP😁
What sigma lens is that? It looks like the 20mm art. I only ask because I’m wondering how to attached the polar pro matte box to the 20mm sigma art lens without going the rail support route since that lens doesn’t have filter threads haha
BM Ursa Mini Pro G2 solves nearly all of those problems... Yeah it's not full frame but I find a much bigger difference in having internal RAW and 150fps at dci 4k.
the ursa sucks in lowlight and have terrible ir pollution issues, great camera with great image, but these cameras are run and gun doc tv cameras that have great af and lowlight, the ursa is designed for sets with lights and irnd.
@@imabigsandwich1292 The G2 is much better in low light than the G1, though obviously not as good as having dual native iso. And I use a pocket 4k for any low light stuff anyway. Auto focus is a matter of personal taste. I don't ever use it and prefer using a remote follow focus, so don't think of that negatively for the BM cameras. AF is a clear win for the fx9
@@danielwylie-eggert2041 True, I also love my bmpcc4k, and have rented the mini, pro g1 and pro g2 before for projects, it's better, but still sucks compared to the pocket and the fx9 and c500 mk2. Autofocus in this case is requested by clients, so if you don't have it you just can't get the job, it's not even a workflow thing. And tv and documentary clients only wants fs7 and c300mk2, so these cameras are the natural choice for them, blackmagics aren't even in their consideration for a cams unfortunately.
@@danielwylie-eggert2041 Oh yeah that's right, their internal nds are ir compensated, but when you don't use nds it's still ir polluted, my pocket also has this issue, so I had to put a heliopan ir cut in front of lens at all times.
Which camera would you buy and why? Fx9 or C500?
FX9! In general I want to switch to Sony as Canon are just too slow with upgrades and updates. Thank you for all the value and for the shout out on your LIVE to my country, South Africa. I appreciate you big time :)
@@malcolmrainers Love South Africa!
Really thorough video Mark! I would say it really matches your style of final image after coloring a bit more (moodier, darker, etc) But, I think the canon is still the better choice in image quality. Also, I know the ergonomics work better for someone who doesn't primarily do handheld/shoulderstyle shooting primarily. Finally yes, canon sucks at slowmo, but I'm a big believer that 60p and above is waaaayyyy overdone now so overcrank for me is not a big deal.
right now i'll be super happy with a Sony A7SII.. i don't think i'm ready for a big boy camera 😄
Still keeping my bmpcc4k
Can’t buy any of those, but I still enjoy watching this...
Borrow one of ours! :)
Mark Bone yes, one day I will come to Toronto, borrow a camera of yours and apply all the things you teach! ✊🏼😤
Yup! Not even close to needing to buy one.
Me too!!!
@@markbone can I borrow?! :D
Mark's decision makes sense based upon his situation. It's the same for all of us. If you have clients who like and request Sony and don't ever care about shooting RAW, buy the FX-9. I had it for a month to write a review, shot three client projects on it, it's a great camera. If you have clients who are not really in the FS7 MKII/FX-9 demo and like the Canon look, buy the C500 MKII, it's an amazing camera as well. You could easily shoot any kind of programming on either of these incredible machines.
The main differentiators for me would be glass owned (I own a dozen Canon EF mount lenses), whether or not you want to shoot RAW or your clients do (we have several clients who we shoot a lot of green screen for, they LOVE RAW) and your budget. S-Cinetone brings actual usable colors to the FX-9 straight out of camera and it's a lot cheaper than the C500 MKII. Just remember too, if RAW is a big factor for you and your work, the C200 has dropped to $6,500.00 and it is still 90% as capable as either of these cameras.
Also, just an observation, FF is ok but nothing to make a buying decision off of. S35 is still 99% as effective for most types of filmmaking, I ran the FX-9 FF and S35 mode on my shoots and either worked really well.
No reason to bad mouth anyone who buys either of these cameras or play brand fanboy, either of them are better than anything on the market under $16k.
Great insights Daniel. I have fallen in love with my 24mm on FF so it’s a big deal for me these days and yes, price is much cheaper for the Sony!!
Why don’t many of the more popular RUclips camera reviewers talk about the Ursa Pro G2 4.6k? Seems like it has a lot of the same features and a great price
“Date the camera, marry the lenses.”
It’s a no brainer choice since you have a lot of Sony glass. Why would you change to Canon.
Love that quote!
Absolutely. I'm getting the BMPCC4K next, not because of the camera, but because I have a bunch of M43rds cine primes. The lenses all together cost much more than the body does.
@@Kaboom1212Gaming Upgrading from a GH4 / GH5?
@@BeaPhotographerlessons No I have the original BMPCC from 2012. It's got a great look, but mine is getting beat up. The mini hdmi connection entirely snapped off the board so I don't have that anymore for my monitor. And there are a few dead pixels in the display screen. None show up in the image, but it's getting old now. I still love the look of the image so I'll use it on certain projects, but it's tough doing client work when the see a janky camera like that :)
Just subbed bro...found you via Matti's channel and binge watched your vids. No disrespect to Matti, but you're my new fav filmmaker on RUclips! 🙂 You're crazy talented but also down-to-earth and you keep it real, and as an aspiring filmmaker also out of the 6ix, I've experienced first hand much of the stuff you talk about, so I know you know your shit. Your work is straight 🔥and an inspiration, especially the way you utilize your dark and moody look...I love shooting that style myself! Keep doin what you do brother! Oh, and FX9 for exactly the same reasons you mentioned...again, those who know, know!
Wow thanks Jules 🙏🏻🙏🏻 hope this channel helps you along your filmmaking journey
The gyro stabilization is actually super powerful and one of the main reasons I'm considering the camera. If you check out some Catalyst test clips, you'll see that it's possible to replicate the look of gimbal or steadicam (if you use a fast shutter speed). I'd consider it a major win for short-form shooting like commercials. For long form, the additional render time is probably a deal breaker.
I can’t wait to mess around with the catalyst software. I read somewhere it works best with Sony lenses due to the metadata. Is that true?
All I know is that it will only work with lenses that can supply metadata to the camera. So it won't work with vintage or manual lenses. But maybe off-brand modern lenses (Sigma, Tamron) will be ok. Catalyst applies lens distortion correction based on a unique profile for each lens, so it needs the lens to ID itself.
@@BrandonLiUnscripted hopefully my EF lenses that are adapted provide this data, I doubt Sony wants that though
According to the official product page, Sony E mount lenses are required. So yeah no EF compatibility unfortunately.
Is this better than Warp stabilizer?
I still want a C500 but this video is super informative and gives a good list of stuff to ask canon to implement.. I appreciate reviews with facts like this one
We've had the FX9 since Jan 2, love it, use the variable ND all the time, have it also on our FS5, great review, Mark!!!!
Nice!
I was honestly blown away with how much better the FX9 is from the FS7. I had two FS7's and used them all the time for all kinds of productions (when cine level wasn't an option). I agree with you about the lack of varispeed in 6K FF, it's a bummer but I'm glad they at least acknowledged it and are releasing through firmware. I've heard they're also allowing up to 120fps in 4k ProRes RAW which is extremely exciting. I'm really hoping to upgrade our cameras to these FX9's, happy to hear from another commercial director how they fair on real world sets. Thanks again for the very well done review!
The Bus and Submarine scale's were amazing 😂😂
Sony needs to figure it out lol. those weren't even with the RAW recorder attached, just the adapter
@@markbone its crazy how big it is! I didn't know how much bigger it was over the extension Unit on the FS7 until i got mine... I like a large camera but its defiantly makes it huge!
Brian Hunt what is your setup these days with it?
@@markbone Using the shape handle extension, same style one that I used on my FS7 for years, think thats a must have, external small HD 703 monitor, Wood Camera EFV holder/arm and looking at getting the Wooden Camera V-mount accessory. Looks really nice and compact and allows you to still be able to have a sony batter in the camera itself so you could hot swap Vmount while recording. I have a bunch of the sony batteries but finding the FX8 definitely draws quite a bit more power then the FS7 so needing to swap batteries more often then I would like too, so Vmount on the back will help with that.
@@BrianHunt irudkuyou find webcam ysd osustho xx
I was considering the C500 II as I was blown away by the image quality. FX9 not too far off apparantly ! Thanks for the review.
Yeah they’re a lot closer than people would like to think from my experiences so far
I love the image quality out of my Sony A7iii in 4K. When your settings are dialed in and focus is bang on the image looks so clear and cinematic. Nice video as always Mark ✌🏻
If by some chance you actually get to read my comment I’d like to ask a question please? I really don’t like the 120p on the Sony A7iii. I shoot with a Sony 16-35 f2.8 GM. If I were to shoot with a Sony Prime, do you think I’d see better results at 120p? Thanks mate.
Are you shooting S&Q 120fps or native 120?
Mark Bone I’ve tried both but I shoot native.
One thing I’ve found with Sony 1080 is to shoot with a shallow depth of field. With the lower bitrate it will render better images if everything isn’t in focus. So a fast prime lens or shooting on the 35 end will render best results
Nice review man, I'm a Blackmagic / Canon shooter but looks like a pretty cool cam with lovely image.
Love to hear the different perspective of these cameras. They seem to compete but they still doesn't compete because they have their own focus on specs and handling the camera. I would choose Canon C500 because of the form factor and raw internal. Also because I like to manual focus with canon lenses 😅
Great video Mark...I’ve shot quite a bit on the c500 Mark ii and made a few videos about it. Thanks for the real world review of the fx9. Looks to be an interesting camera.
Thanks mate!
“That’s like calling your record button ‘save.’” 🤣🤣🤣
Thank you for making this Mark! I've been eyeing the FX9 closely and this is helpful.
Get one! Or buy our Fs7's lol
@@markbone lol I'm looking for a run and gun camera (currently on an a7iii and love the hybrid features of it), that I could take on tour with artists and document on the fly handheld. So a rig that is quick is important to me. For that what would you recommend, FS7 or FX9 or neither lol?
@@lukestrege502 If you're doing handheld both are great! The Fx9 images are so gorgeous but if you want an Fs7 we are selling two of them!
Wow, that cinetone profile looks beautiful. Thanks for the video -- all the important information in a very digestible manner.
👌🏻
That autofocus sound is just the Sigma 18-35. They all have noisy autofocus and it is the ONLY flaw in that lens - other than that, one of the best pieces of glass you can put in your bag (unless you're a full frame shooter).
Do you ever use vintage lenses on this kind of high-end rig? and if so, why? a dedicated video on the topic would be lovely :-)
1991ClarkJames sometimes I do. Older lenses often have more interesting bokeh. Typically though if I’m gonna shoot a commercial I would try and rent something like the Canon K35
This camera really delivers sick quality! Love watching footage of it. Great that you shared your thoughts
Thanks mate!!
Thanks for the comparison video Mark! I appreciate your insights!
i started on the f55 and even today having shot RED, Canon and Arri, i miss the f55 - it’s look, it’s simplicity. i got my hands on an Arri Alexa Studio - there’s a truck inside it i’m certain, but even at 2K it’s got a better picture than anything available. I also shoot with the Sony Z280 which has a lot of the features you love about the fx9- but obviously not full frame. the variable nd is insane - and putting it on auto leaving f1.9 is like being spoiled. great real world look - and great commercials. cheers
One of my first cinema cameras was the F5! The younger bro for the F55
I've never felt like cropping in 120p was a big deal (assuming you're not losing resolving ability, which at 1080p you're not). If I want slow motion, it's usually because I want to highlight detail, so it's nice to be able to get closer to the action without changing a lens. Nobody wants to shoot static wide landscapes in slow motion!! 😂 Having said that I do much prefer the FS7/FX9 to the C300mkII/C500mkII for other reasons.
I really enjoy watching your vids... I am not a cinematographer by any mean or even close... but I enjoy all the info and insight you provide. It does help a lot. I actually laughed out loud with the school bus 30 ft and submarine 560 ft reference. Can't wait to see your next vid or be in the next live.
Thanks mate!!
Good call. I used to be a Canon man but was swayed from years of shooting FS7 and this FX9 looks great. Nice video.
Thanks mate
I've been doing some heavy research on the FX9 during all this lockdown and this is one of the best videos I've come across, real world use! - I think that lack of FF 4K currently is a bit of an issue, hopefully they don't take too long to get that update out.
Now that you've got two of them, you can build an office gym and use them for weightlifting as well! Might even throw in a C-Stand to function as a bar!
bahaha, I should!
Great review Mark! Loved it. About the stabilization. I don’t personally own either of the cameras, but I’ve been watching a lot of YT videos on the topic and this guy did some tests on the C500mkII EIS with and without lens stabilization and honestly it looked pretty disappointing. Meanwhile I saw some tests using the FX9 and that software and it looked amazing. Stabilized the shots really nicely using the gyro metadata. They might implement that into DaVinci Resolve and maybe even Premiere at some point. All in all great choice and I hope it serves you well! 🤗
I rented both the C500ii and FX9. For me, the stabilization on the C500 was incredible; you can hand hold a 70-200 (non-IS) at 200mm and it looks completely stable. It's amazing. The FX9 stabilization software only works with a specific set of Sony lenses, and only if IS is turned off on the lens. So for me the C500 has a better implementation of stabilization technology, as it can also be used with PL lenses too, whereas the FX9 is much more limited. Both awesome cameras though, can't really go wrong IMO.
Thanks Mark, I liked this review, especially the double ISO - with clean 4000 iso signal and the no stepping ND, those are great useful features. Also the shots looked very nice and clean. I am doing some documentary work on a budget with my fuji XH1 but I enjoyed looking at the professional tools to learn what they have to offer over the standard mirrorless setups.
FYI a big reason why Sony doesn’t have internal raw on the fx9 is due to Red’s patent on internal compressed RAW recording. Part of the reason why the Venice records “xocn” but not “RAW”
You should collaborate with C500ii users (Armando) to inform future buyers of the pros and cons of each system.
Hey Great video. Lots of insights from a realistic and personal point of view; Just my 2 cents concerning the "iris wheel" problem you have with the C500 MKII. It's simple as hell, this can be deactivated (or set to any parameter such as iso or WB) in the dedicated assign button menu. And to change the iris then on you can use the wheel on the grip...
Nicos Tube solved! I’ll definitely set this up next time
It is an electronic variable ND, not a circular polarizing filter 🤨 polarizing filters come with a lot of problems.
Came here to say this. Sony did huge R&D on this and it shouldn't be ignored.
Thats awesome, i hate VND filters, that cross polarization is awful.
Great review mate, straight to the point! Have you ever worked with the Panasonic Eva1?
Is there a purpose to keeping the ND in your polar pro basecamp if the Fx9 has the built-in one?
I believe you can't use catalyst software/stabilization when the ND is in play at the same time.
@@giovannigarcia10 Wut, seriously?
The electronic variable ND on the Fx9 only goes up to 7 stops. If you want 10 stops, to shoot f/1.8 in broad day light etc, you’ll need to add additional ND.
@@zacharykepler3567 Can you confirm whether or not you can use stabilization when the ND filter in engaged?
@@zacharykepler3567 One of the reasons why I choose the C300III.
The noise is not the adapter, just typical Sigma Lens. Happens both on my 50mm and 30mm Art. Wish they were silent...Cool vid btw 😎👍
Zeek yeah it’s just seems to be the norm on all sigma lenses that are adapted
@@markbone
Well I guess it makes sense to use an external recorder. Just another step though.
If the FX9 had full-frame 4k 120p (10bit+) it would be my dream camera flat out no questions asked
I think the only cameras that can do that is the Onyx by Phantom
Fast forward 8 months to the FX6
Thanks so much for the video. All great stuff but it would be so great if you could make a downloadable file of your footage even if its watermarked. Btw what are you putting in the matte box. Do you feel that the picture needs softening? Meanwhile thank so much and take care. Best K
Mark, appreciated your review! I am a five-year Sony FS7 vet and it’s been hard for me to justify the purchase of a camera that on the surface only seems to be moderately better than what I have. I shoot in slog3 and grade most projects in Resolve, so I’m already squeezing a ton of goodness out of my images anyway. Most of my clients are local/regional corporate clients that don’t see the quality difference between a Sony and an Arri, so how much better is the quality between the two, really? Is it really that much better? 10K in the middle of CV crisis for a cam that is basically a full frame FS7 with better low light performance might not be the best business decision 😜
Thx!
If your clients don't care, then there isn't a return on investment! Good call
@@markbone 👍 Appreciate your channel. Keep it up! Too many youtubers out there with virtually NO pro experience doing reviews and tutorials. You're a BRIGHT spot on the interwebs!
Everybody shoots in a different way, but we have found some of the audio handling/routing improvements over the FS7 to be useful on the FX9.
Hey Mark ! How did you soundproof your studio ? Your sound is very clear :). Thanks for all the great content, one of the best videographer imho
I don’t. I just use a really nice mic 🤪
@@markbone Hahahaha, love that. Cheers
Hi Mark, I am a FS7 owner but recently ordered the FX9. Out of curiosity, I noticed that you have a very clean set up. No Sony EVF (on FS7 and FX9) and no handle with magnifier, etc. How does it work for you like that? Using the Small HD, you need batteries, etc. I was thought the EVF of the FX9 was better? And the handle to me seems really practical, especially
the magnify button...
I only use the arm when I’m on a easy rig or my shoulder. I hate all standard camera monitors (unless they’re made by RED) compared to a large size external monitor. I have an adapter that powers the monitor off the batteries but even so I don’t really care that if I need batteries, the image quality and my trust in the focus of an external monitor is just so much dang better the than the monitors that come default for Sony/Canon that I don’t mess around. Also too LUTS and False colour are so important for me. When you’re trying to DP and really understand the image you’re capturing I feel you need a good monitor, world of difference
@@markbone I like working with the Small HD bright 501, but I need to power it through my V mount battery, so I need the external unit. Are there any other solutions? One last question, I sometimes shoot with my metabones ultra adapter/canon 24-70L 2.8 Does the autofocus work with this combi on the FX9. Do you happen to know? Thanks. Nice work btw!
The noise of focusing is normal for some of the early lenses. I didn't go for FX9 while I noticed it does not support 4k 60fps in full-frame mode. Besides, no 444 or 4444 or raw is a bit disappointing, so I still keep my ARRI Amira, and waiting for the firmware update of FX9 or C300III published.
Have you ever tried a Blackmagic cinema camera? The Ursa Mini Pro G2 has crazy codecs, frame rates, and latitude. If you haven’t tried one I’d definitely recommend experimenting one for your next shoot or doing some test shots - the debate between Canon and Sony is old and a little restrictive. Pocket 4K is amazing as well
yeah I've used them a bunch! Love the images, hate the form factor. but they're still great.
Mark Bone touché
Hey Mark, great video! Do you typically shoot in Cine EI or Custom mode?
I've been impressed with the C500 MK II back when it was hiding inside of an unwieldy lunker called the C700. Putting it into a smaller, more affordable package makes it a no-brainer, but props to Sony for bringing excellent colors from their high end cinema cameras to a far more affordable option.
You pretty much nailed it when you said they design these in the lab, and not often with real DPs. Every camera has some design flaws, and Sony is no exception. But that lack of built full-frame 4k and not including raw is pretty much the nail in the coffin for me. I can get that in a sub $2K camera. Why is Sony being so obtuse?
It's so frustrating. I'm totally with you. The more I use my Fx9, the less I like it.
I wish I had the sony FS7 I can't afford a camera like that I am working on a Project but I had to Barrow a camera for 2 days but it would be nice to own your own good video do you have any films on Netflix? If so what ones I would love to watch it
Check out Flight of the Butterflies (I helped edit) if it's still there or Transcend (the running documentary) or go to rescatethefilm.com
Hi Mark, love your vid, as always. Got a question though : why not the Z-CAM ? Seems like for less than half the price you got mostly better specs
Yeah I just haven’t got my hands on it. Would love to try it!
I have no business buying an FX9 (I'm a DIY youtube vlogger part time, my day job is something completely different) but I'm a junkie for incredible image quality. I'm mainly worried about size! Do you think it's possible to strip down the kit for portability?
yeah, you can get rid of the matte box and top handle
Hey Mark ! Good stuff! What do you think is the difference between FX9 and Venice? image wise.
Hey Mark just found your channel love the content! I have an FS700 with a Shogun 7 for external 4K footage I want to keep as a B cam would you recommend the FS7 Mkii as a primary or wait until the FX9 drops in price?
The Fx9 is a decent step up from the Fs7, I would go with it
Mark Bone actually going to give the zcam f6 a go. The footage I’ve been seeing is nice and I like the form factor.
What's up with the matte box when you have that great variable nd dial? Do you use for polarizing? Awesome video once again!
It’s the basecamp VND
The cinetone looks really good! It's so hard to decide for a camera dude. Wanna purchase an entry cinema level camera soon and this could be a good option (even tho it's not entry-level haha). Still wanna wait if canon announces C300MIII or the Komodo.
Cameras are like buying cars, there will always be next years model on the horizon, the best one is the one that gets you from point A to B.
Very well said man. :)
The Sigma Art Lenses are ultra silent on a sony if you're using the native E-Mount. I also got the 35mm 1.4 EF-Mount on the Sigma MC-11 Converter for my A7III and the autofocus is noticeable loud and clicky. The native E-Mount lenses are also much smoother, during the autofocus
Yes! We just bought a bunch of Sigma Art E-mount
@MarkBone you are a straight G 👌... I like hearing your perspective on cameras and filmmaking because this is what you do for a living and you're not sharing this ever more common "youtube gear reviewer" POV which feels more like a sales pitch. You're an incredible filmmaker too!
Thanks mate! Appreciate it. Just trying to share my insights from #setlife
wow how times have changed, i keep hearing film makers talk about autofocus or auto iris or autoND wtf happened, progress ??, i still dont have an auto lens, just clean primes, the FX9 or C500 neither one, last canon i had was XL1, and after the sony F900 sony went a bit off with colour, all cameras are good now, its the content thats overlooked ,,
I agree! I spoke about it in one of my last videos ruclips.net/video/jKHCmNyUBvU/видео.html
Sony can't add internal true RAW recording due to RED's RAW patent. That's why Blackmagic's RAW is called "BRAW" and Canon's "Cinema RAW Light" and as I understand it - these RAW codecs are slightly compressed?
Yes. BRaw has a layer of debayer so it’s not true RAW. I don’t know how Canon gets around it though
I’ve owned the C100 and C200 and never have I had an issue with the IRIS wheel on the front left and this is the first time I’ve heard someone complain about it. Now that the C300 mk iii has internal Raw, 4k 120fps with no crop, 2k 180fps and 422 standard, how would you compare them even tho you haven’t shot with it?
C300MKIII is gonna be a beast!
have fun with the fx9 turkey tail external raw. Has nothing on the c500 with pro res raw on atamos with dual autofocus. external rec and monitor in one unit with the atamos. c500 low light is sick, skin tones are sick, colors pop like a Warhaul commercial. Might wish I worked for Cannon but I don't.
It's like calling your record button "save" Lol, great video, I remember searching forever... I'm going to pick one up!
I am an EPK DP in ICG669 amd we shoot on sony FS7 mostly and I have own a Sony A7Rii so all my glass is Sony/Zeiss collaboration of gmaster so I am hoping to get into an FX9 this year bit have been weary of the limitations I hear about.. thanks for the video..
Welcome mate
Best Joke ever,..... NO INTERNAL RAW,...... "SONY PLEASE WE DON'T WANT THE CAMERA BEING AS LONG AS A SCHOOL BUS"!!!!
interesting and useful comparison of cameras, with a lively and engaging tone and, most important, based on real usage. Do you think there is still a clear gap between high end cinema cameras, mid level cinema cameras like the FX9, and hybrid mirrorless ? Do you think you could shoot a documentary with sufficient quality on a xt4, or on the future eosr5?
yeah, dynamic range is king for me, and the high end cameras take the cake on that. Also, no one beats the Alexa colour science. Also yes you could shoot on one of those mirrorless cameras for a doc but audio is always the biggest hurdle and thats' why I don't mess with cameras that don't have XLR in unless they're my B-Cam
The built-Nd VND is way better than a double polarizing filtration system that often causes artifact. Sony system is an electronic and optical that has a crazy wide range and produces not color shit or artifact at all.
Yeah it’s LCD from what I’ve read. It’s very nice
Mark Bone I fuckin miss that on my A7III...
Thank you for your time to do this review. I can see your thoughts about Sony listening to filmmakers and Canons just creating products in labs. But as you said, also wish Sony had some more comparison resolutions and dynamic range as their competitors. But overall, such reliable products on some intense shoots in all kinds of environments.
I'm an Ursa Mini Pro fan here. Saw a lot of pros and cons, the variable ND is a huge unique factor! How would you say the FX9 compares to in image quality and in handling to the Ursa mini Pro 4.6k?
Mark, please create an online course for basic camera instruction. I would pay $$$ for a course like that. #justsaying
This was a very good insight! You have very good talent and seem to understand all the aspects of the camera, something I see in very few people that do this kind of work. I bet you're easy to work with too. Now i have a new name to look for.
Very nice. You even got Patrick Bateman to pose for you! ;)
Bahaha 😂
Software update coming now, announcement was after this video.
I really enjoyed your video: right to the pint, succinct, clear and sincere.
Do you think the FX9 could be use for narrative/fictional content? is it really too big the camera when you add the back?
Pablo Pucci naw it’s perfect for those. I have shot plenty with the back on my Fs7, I was just making a big deal about it to make a point about the extents you have to go to shoot RAW etc. It’s great for both doc and narrative
Thanks for the vid. Great review and sample shots. I've been contemplating between the FX9 and C500. I'm leaning more toward the Sony since I already have several high-quality sony Zeiss and GMaster lenses. The size and weight are important to me also. It actually doesn't look terrible and huge in your video stripped down and without the super-weird handle. I'm leaning a little further now towards the Sony.
Hi Mark, love your channel and your content. For someone like myself ( an aspiring filmmaker ) I find your reviews on kit and your general advice around filmmaking extremely helpful and encouraging.
I wanted to ask your advice on something, I own and currently shoot with my Sony A7iii. I have managed to build up a pretty solid kit over the last few years of various native G-Master glass and have successfully used the A7iii on numerous narrative short film shoots and documentaries but I’m now looking at adding either the FS5 or the FS7 into the mix and I can’t decide which of these cameras would make the best sense in investing in.
I have a very little experience of using the FS5 on a couple of shoots and although I never really fully put it through its paces, it felt and functioned brilliantly and was a real joy to use even from the simplicity of better ergonomics.
I’m looking for an upgrade from the A7iii, but will keep the A7iii as my B camera.
Which camera out of the FS5 or the FS7, in your opinion would be the better to go for? I intend to shoot more narrative short films, documentaries and branded content with whichever camera I go for.
If you have the time to read my message and response I’d hugely appreciate it, but I also understand your probably hugely busy man.
Thanks Mark
Keep up the great work
Best
Neil
I would always buy an Fs7 over an fs5
Mark Bone thanks man, appreciate your advice man
Mark - do you use FX9 rigged on the shoulder or only handheld? If so which rig do you use to keep it light as possible and with a balanced centre of gravity?
Really cool insight Mark! At your stage, would your clients feel 'cheated' if you were to shoot on something like an A7iii vs an Alexa or C500ii/FX9? Thanks!
Depends the client. If they’re paying lots, it’s nice for them to feel like were using cameras that justify the cost but they usually care more about final product
@@markbone so would you mainly say the reason you and other documentary-style filmmakers use these types of cameras is due to the dynamic range and better range in colour grading? Because other cheaper & lighter cameras also have 180fps 2k or 120fps 4k etc. Don't get me wrong, the fact that you were able to recover detail from the highlights and bring up the shadows internally is pretty impressive (my A7iii can't do that lol) but if you can't shoot internal RAW then is there much a gain? (law of diminishing returns at play here i guess haha)
It’s the compression/bit-rate and dynamic range. A7III footage falls apart when you try to pull back highlights but Fx9 is pretty sturdy. Did you watch the scene where I pulled back the information in the sky? You could never do that on the A7III
@@markbone yes for sure, makes sense, saw the whole review, just wanted a bit more clarification. Appreciate it Mark! Stay safe
Great video Mark! In regards to the noise you hear with the Sigma art lenses with the Canon EF adaptor, it happens with all the Sigma lenses if you are using the adaptor but the native E mount Sigma lenses it does not. I did a test on the FX9 on a bunch of lenses and speak specifically to the Sigma lenses here ruclips.net/video/RspvZ6dMkbc/видео.html
Great news!
Hi Mark, brilliant review. Ive just bought an fs7 and I have native full frame sony glass and Im looking for one lens that really fits the fs7. Would you go speedbooster and a 24-70 canon/tamron or sigma 18-35 f1.8 with normal adapter?
Casper Janning it all depends what you’re shooting. I typically go for 24-70’s but again, all depends on the subject matter
Mark Bone why do you go for that one? :)
The school bus and the submarine are my favorites 😅
Hey mark so what is your work flow for when you shoot raw? Because as far as I know premiere doesn’t support raw? Or is it just pro res raw that it doesn’t support yet? Thanks for all the great content!
PP can support Canon RAW light helpx.adobe.com/ca/premiere-pro/using/supported-file-formats.html
Just a question tho, is it your personal preference to have more green tones in ur videos? Skin looks greenish for sure but done in an artistic way. Im confused if it’s a sony problem or just ur style
Hey! Which is your go to fast zoom lens for documentary? And which lens are you using in your test footage? Looks gorgeous
I often just stick to either the Canon 24-70 series 1 when not using a matte box but if I do need a matte box then I’ll use the Cambrio 19-90
C500II hands down. More compact, more versatile, Int RAW, better codec, trust color science, best AF, best IS, ...more appeal! what'else!
I looked through the description, but what brand is your top handle?
Wooden Camera
Reviews of this kind is what we need
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
The 18-35 sigma autofocus is noisy lol its the lens it sucks for vlogging or when using audio from camera
Thanks for the really detailed review, so what are you going to do with your Fs7?
Selling it! interested?
Hi Mark. Thanx for the info! Is yours the Fs7 the mark 2? or the older? I am considering upgrading from my A7r2 to a "real video" camera :-)
Just the Mark 1
I'm curious if you have on to the fx6 since this video, 4k 120 FF is amazing!, I wish sony would add internal to the FX6 mkii, that would be crazy!
If to choose camera for documentaries then Sony is a better option. But for set I would go with Canon. It's Raw, it's lighter, you can put it on a Ronin S. I prefer the Canon color science. Sony still looks videoish for me. Even Mark's color grading choice is terrible.
Would you have considered the C300mk3 now that's come out? Aside from Full Frame... it's a good competitor.
The Shooting PD yeah definitely! It’s gonna be a great camera. Sony should be scared
Thanks great info. What kind of Mattebox do you have on the lens?
Do you have computer glasses you wear while editing? Night shift messes with the colors, so I don't ever turn that on. I was wondering if you had any recommendations on how to reduce eye strain.
Great informative video Mark! I also use a MC-11 adapter for my Sony with the 35mm 1.4 ART EF and it makes some noise on autofocus as well. I think it's just how the lens + adapter work together on the camera. My buddies 35mm ART E mount lens doesn't make any noise. Haven't found a fix though :P hope that helps!
Is it suits for documentary or movies !!
love your work man, great video, very insightful.
Great review Mark! For the Kinobody footage, did you shoot in SLOG-3 or S-Cinetone? When I used the FX9 for my last video, I had a hard time using my Phantom Arri LUTS with SLOG-3 as I found the greens suuuuper green compared to FS7. Would love to know how you graded the Kinobody stuff! Thanks
I used Slog3 and just graded out the green as much as possible. Slog2 to 709 can work also in a pinch
I noticed you don't use cine lenses. Is there a reason why?
Can you do a video about cine vs photo lenses.
It seems like, if one doesn't use cine lenses is a not DP😁
What sigma lens is that? It looks like the 20mm art.
I only ask because I’m wondering how to attached the polar pro matte box to the 20mm sigma art lens without going the rail support route since that lens doesn’t have filter threads haha
24mm sigma
BM Ursa Mini Pro G2 solves nearly all of those problems... Yeah it's not full frame but I find a much bigger difference in having internal RAW and 150fps at dci 4k.
the ursa sucks in lowlight and have terrible ir pollution issues, great camera with great image, but these cameras are run and gun doc tv cameras that have great af and lowlight, the ursa is designed for sets with lights and irnd.
@@imabigsandwich1292 The G2 is much better in low light than the G1, though obviously not as good as having dual native iso. And I use a pocket 4k for any low light stuff anyway. Auto focus is a matter of personal taste. I don't ever use it and prefer using a remote follow focus, so don't think of that negatively for the BM cameras. AF is a clear win for the fx9
@@imabigsandwich1292 and the ir pollution isn't an issue with the G2
@@danielwylie-eggert2041 True, I also love my bmpcc4k, and have rented the mini, pro g1 and pro g2 before for projects, it's better, but still sucks compared to the pocket and the fx9 and c500 mk2. Autofocus in this case is requested by clients, so if you don't have it you just can't get the job, it's not even a workflow thing. And tv and documentary clients only wants fs7 and c300mk2, so these cameras are the natural choice for them, blackmagics aren't even in their consideration for a cams unfortunately.
@@danielwylie-eggert2041 Oh yeah that's right, their internal nds are ir compensated, but when you don't use nds it's still ir polluted, my pocket also has this issue, so I had to put a heliopan ir cut in front of lens at all times.