Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Battle of Saragarhi: Indians Won & Indians Lost
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 дек 2021
- From Episode 33 of #AskAbhijit.
WATCH FULL EPISODE: #AskAbhijit 33: Indian History, Geopolitics ► • #AskAbhijit 33: Indian...
SUBSCRIBE ► www.youtube.co...
SHORT CLIPS CHANNEL ► www.youtube.co...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
------------------------------------------------------------------------
►UPI (G-Pay/PhonePe/Paytm): abhijitchavda@icici
►PayPal: paypal.me/Abhi...
►Become A Member on RUclips: / @abhijitchavda
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JOIN #AbhijitChavda
------------------------------------------------------------------------
★Discord: / discord
★Twitter: / abhijitchavda
★Instagram: / theabhijitchavda
★Facebook: / theabhijitchavda
★Website:
★Email Inquiries: inquiries.chavda@gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
#AskAbhijitPodcast
------------------------------------------------------------------------
★Spotify: open.spotify.c...
★Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple...
★Google Podcasts: podcasts.googl...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
#AskAbhijitChavda #Abhijit #Chavda #AskAbhijitShow
This man got mind blowing knowledge about history after being a scientist in his entire professional life and i really want to know what's his view on theosophy and also i call him Sir cause I'm now in history because of him.
I feel the same
@@Luckshae i can feel that..
@@swapnilmahurpwar2339 I
Fact is, all of India fought for British Army whether Hindus, Muslims or Sikhs. Sikhs stood tall among them in majority due to their strength and bravery so they were always first preference for British Generals.
In the Battle of Saragarhi, Sikhs were fighting for British Army but eventually the battle became about saving their land from invaders and above all, the battle was about their honour. British Commanders gave them the option to escape Saragarhi but the Sikhs refused.
Now say, if the Sikhs would have accepted to escape the battle (infact consider the Sikhs never ever even joined the British Army), with the control/destruction of Saragarhi, Afghanis would have easily brought down Fort Gulistan and Fort Lockhart. Aftemath would have been, loot/plunder of cities, Mandirs, rapes, kidnapping young boys and girls as slaves etc. and then Afghanis would have returned back to their lands. Because that is what all their purpose would have been as seen throughout history.
Ofcourse there would have been more battles but with the entry of Afghanis in India, the battle would have already been half lost for British and the Indians.
British Colonized India but India always belonged to Indians. So no matter what empire you fought for, it was always for protecting your land, your country.
Very pertinent point, AbhijitJi. Even in Australia, where I live, Indians fight with Indians all the time. They do this to seek approval from Australians or to prove that they are "the better Indians", and so on. Indians also try to distance themselves from Indian traditions just to prove that they are "modern", cosmopolitan and get with the times. Until Indians decolonize themselves, appreciate the science behind out traditions and learn to respect themselves, this will keep going for years to come. Jai Bharat! 👍🙏🕉
🧠🧠Afghans converted to Islam thousands years ago they choose whatever they want to be and that doesn’t change their DNA, it’s there region indigenously and ethnically and they were Victorious against British led Battles and invasion including allying forces Hindus Sikh with them Britishers.
Afghans defeated all of them and never chooses to be slave of British for many years despite lazy Hindus were enjoying slavery.
You cannot justify modern wars on the basis of ancient times and ancient civilisations when humans were primitive look at the world now no ancient civilisations despite you early humans.🧠🧠
Behari, Bengali, Ponjabi, Madrasi, Tamilial all have their own regions and culture and skin stay happy with that thanks nobody can claim regions on the basis of ancient mythology religions and ancient civilisations.🤧🤧🤧
@@trevorjack8542 LOL... settle down, cowboy! Don't come preaching. Just... go away! Thank you! Jayatu Sanatana. Jai Bharat!🙏🕉
Its the sikhs and punjabi muslim hindus who are britishs servants for last 200 years and most loyal to them..
This looks like some thing which i saw in attack on titan "we are good eldians"-gabi
@@asinh1100 lol bengalis were the first servant of britisheres
Sry Abhijit.. The Sikhs were not fighting for Britain but fighting the people who had committed 2 holocausts against Sikhs and desecrated the Golden Temple. As British soldiers they would have withdrawn but as Sikhs their honour would not let them. Sikh history was still fresh in their minds and rightly so.
True I think Abhijit should have looked spend some time introspecting this battle. With such following and reach there needs to be accountability but I guess it is not that common
May b u r right bt jaliwanwala proves u wrong also.
@@arupsarkar3345 untrue... that was a SAnjay Dixit bongi.. Sanjay admitted it was a research fault..and no Sikh soldiers were involved.. Gurkhas.. Balochis and Pastuns were the ethinicities of the firing squad..
we do.. @@assassincreed1238
Pashtuns Never wanted a Pakistan, they were behind the Great Khan Abdul Gafar khan (Bacha Khan)'s 'Khudai Kitmatgar' army for a United INDiA.... still Congress party deceived Pashtuns and their all time great Pashtun Leader.
With broken heart Bacha khan left Delhi with tears in his eyes and his famous words to Mr.Gandhi and Congress party was "You have thrown us to the Hands of the wolves..!!😢"
After that he and all the pashtuns were sent to jail for entire life
🧠🧠Afghans converted to Islam thousands years ago they choose whatever they want to be and that doesn’t change their DNA, it’s there region indigenously and ethnically and they were Victorious against British led Battles and invasion including allying forces Hindus Sikh with them British.
Afghans defeated all of them and never chooses to be slave of British for many years despite lazy Hindus were enjoying slavery.
You cannot justify modern wars on the basis of ancient times and ancient civilisations when humans were primitive look at the world now no ancient civilisations despite you early humans.🧠🧠
Behari, Bengali, Ponjabi, Madrasi, Tamilial all have their own regions and culture and skin stay happy with that thanks nobody can claim regions on the basis of ancient mythology religions and ancient civilisations.🤧🤧🤧
@begins 2009 Yes.He never wanted his body to have final rituals in Pakistan Soil.So when he died, Body has to be taken to Afghanistan amidst of Civil war there..Surprisingly, all parties agreed to a Cease fire just for Great Bacha Khan's final journey..that was the kind of Respect Pashtuns shown to him.INDiA lost Bacha Khan and Pashtuns alike because of Power Hungry Mr.Gandhi and Congress
@@trevorjack8542 whatever you said doesn't make any sense neither historically nor logically but I am guessing it has something to do with your prejudice against ancient mythologies, presumably Hindu,
Because it's wrong on many levels
Allow me to give you a free history lesson this one time
(Side Note - Islam is false religion)
1 - not all Afghans converted to islam voluntarily or as you put it "by choice" infact the majority of Afghans were forcefully converted to Islam and certainly not thousands of years ago lol, the Islamization of Afghanistan started in the late 10th century which is about 1100 years ago under the Abbasid invasion of Afghanistan who brutally subjugated the local populations into converting to Islam, as a matter of fact many Afghans naturally resisted and even the ones who had converted would revert back to their original religion after escaping and retreating to unconquered regions of Afghanistan, there were frequent religious squirmishes and riots, all of which was put to an end when Ghurids and Ghaznavids started to conquer the whole of Afghanistan and made everyone a Muslim
2 - The DNA of Pashtuns though deriving from one single monolithic central asian group 6000 years ago varies vastly and it more or less matches with the North Indian populations with regional variations in them ranging from Eurasian to Harappan, the only difference between them and Indians is that they are ethnically Iranic people who speak Iranian branch of Indo European languages while North Indians speak Indo Aryan, and understandably so considering they're descended from ancient Scythian people of Central Asia who had settled down in the southern most region of Asia which is today what we know as Afghanistan and northern Pakistan.
Interestingly some of these Scythians also made their way into the Indian subcontinent eventually mixing with local populations and embracing Indian religions so technically Indians and Afghans aren't that different but there certainly exists a remarkable degree of genetic dissimilarity as modern day Pashtuns also intermingled with invading Turkic populations under various Turkic invasions
3 - what indigeneity are you talking about ? Afghan are not Pashtuns only, there are Turks, Tajiks, Uzbeks, Hazaras, Gujjars, Brahui and Nuristani people living there, all of them at one point either invaded or migrated their way into the region, those lands does not belong to Pashtuns only and they're certainly not indigenous, the Harappans and ancient Hunter Gatherer populations were the first to have settled down in what's today Afghanistan, infact it's the Vedas the most ancient Hindu texts that record the habitats of these ancient populations that says the Pakhta people or the Pashtuns live in mountains of northwest, it has been cited by numerous Afghan nationalists as the proof of their claim on the lands of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, the very scriptures you called 'mythologies', also Gandhar the eastern most region of modern day Afghanistan was inhabited by Hindus which is evident from the numismatic, textual and architectural evidences, it is not just the Mythology that says that, it's History too
4 - what war are you talking about ? British did conquer Afghanistan and installed their stooge Shuja Shah as the Emir of Afghanistan and spared the life of Dost Muhammad Khan Barakzai consequently exiling him to India, it was only the intra British feuds that led to the downfall of British in Afghanistan but before retreating back to India they not only avenged the Afghan culprits responsible for killing British soldiers during their expedition, they also weakened Afghanistan into a very weak nation by dividing into two halfs by Durand line wherein the KPK was merely a North Western frontier of Indian Nation.
5 - Hindus and Sikhs weren't slaves of the British, British respected us both and termed us as Martial races, keep in mind, there were Pathaans too in British Army back then and if serving the Brits falls as slavery then Muslims were as much slaves to Brits as Hindus were
6. Your Modern Warfare and Early Human remark probably was born out of your desperation to distinguish Afghans from Indians where in they should be fantasizing about Invading and Killing Hindus like you rather than link themselves and possibly sympathize with us isn't it ?
Well get this straight in your mind and I don't mean to be a chauvinist or something but you're alive and muslim only because you have Hindus as your enemies. The Biharis, Punjabis, Bengalis, Marathis, Gujratis, Sindhis, and Tamils are all united under one banner as we're distinct in what we speak but one in essence, culture and religion. Also Tamils are the same as Madrasis lmfao
@@MagicSmoke11 so true 😥.. and so tragic...
Even today Indians are fighting against Indians. (India and Pakistan)
HAR Har Mahadev 🚩👍
#askabhijit
Goa inquisition. How christians destroyed goa hindus
read the goa inquisition book by ak priolkar all doubts of yours will be cleared
...u can check out Shefali vaidya interviews and books, she a goa'n writer
He already told a book that explains all this things.
Well about 75% of Goan people are Hindus
@@ChandranPrema123 Christan left for Portugal when India acquired Goa again
1. There is no corroboration of Saragarhi from Afghan side. How many Afghans attacked Saragarhi is only a story given by Britishers.
2. Sikhs and Punjabi Hindus had history of barbaric attacks by Afghans. For them Afghans were more evil force than Britishers.So from their PoV it was not Indian fighting Indian.
I disagree on your argument of Indians fighting Indians in Saragadhi, I don't think afghans considered themselves as Indians even at that time. Rule/invasion of afghans in india was a havoc on Indians (atleast after the fall of mughal empire) and there might be a reason for Sikhs to fight against Afghans thinking that if we lose this region then afghans will become powerful and they might attack and devastate India again.
sikh empire rose to power after seeing a decline in power of mughal empire and Afghan oppression and kidnappings that they did during their expansion eastwards. in the end afghans were able to defend themselves preventing a british takeover on their land but sikh empire alongside sind and balockistan got integrated into british raj. this is the reason sikha had to fight for the british. its called a regime change. if the company you are working in chnages their boss you stil have to listen to his orders. not to be rude but they way you phrased it in this video makes the audience feel like the soldiers killed the pastuns with personal hate. its not like they had a choice. in army your primary objective is all you have to to until its done or you die.
#askabhijit sir i hope you can confirm what i said is true. i would appreciate if you make a video about thia topic giving more details and more perspectives
Fact is, all of India fought for British Army whether Hindus, Muslims or Sikhs. Sikhs stood tall among them in majority due to their strength and bravery so they were always first preference for British Generals.
In the Battle of Saragarhi, Sikhs were fighting for British Army but eventually the battle became about saving their land from invaders and above all, the battle was about their honour. British Commanders gave them the option to escape Saragarhi but the Sikhs refused.
Now say, if the Sikhs would have accepted to escape the battle (infact consider the Sikhs never ever even joined the British Army), with the control/destruction of Saragarhi, Afghanis would have easily brought down Fort Gulistan and Fort Lockhart. Aftemath would have been, loot/plunder of cities, Mandirs, rapes, kidnapping young boys and girls as slaves etc. and then Afghanis would have returned back to their lands. Because that is what all their purpose would have been as seen throughout history.
Ofcourse there would have been more battles but with the entry of Afghanis in India, the battle would have already been half lost for British and the Indians.
British Colonized India but India always belonged to Indians. So no matter what empire you fought for, it was always for protecting your land, your country.
Wo unki dharti wo khud ko kuch v claim kare tumko kya be! 😂
@@Hashim_4_Excellence muslim aukaat dikha hi deta hai apni hmesha. Mughals ne india detroy kra tha and that was a fact tabbhi gaand chat te ho tm log unki
@@Hashim_4_Excellence haan to ye hamari dharti hai to apne allah ka claim hatao be.
My opinion : What you said is true sir. But what if the Afghans were allowed to enter India? They were the most brutal people in centuries. Brutal than even Aurangzeb. They had caused the two Sikh massacres earlier(Ghallugharas)(People should see the pictorial representations of these two ghallugharas). And it was not like they would stop after taking back tge Pashtun areas. They had in the past conquered western India(Pakistan) and Kashmir. No reason to believe they would not expand again. Not justifying fighting for the British here. But fighting against Afghans was necessary.
🧠🧠Afghans converted to Islam thousands years ago they choose whatever they want to be and that doesn’t change their DNA, it’s there region indigenously and ethnically and they were Victorious against British led Battles and invasion including allying forces Hindus Sikh with them Britishers.
Afghans defeated all of them and never chooses to be slave of British for many years despite lazy Hindus were enjoying slavery.
You cannot justify modern wars on the basis of ancient times and ancient civilisations when humans were primitive look at the world now no ancient civilisations despite you early humans.🧠🧠
Behari, Bengali, Ponjabi, Madrasi, Tamilial all have their own regions and culture and skin stay happy with that thanks nobody can claim regions on the basis of ancient mythology religions and ancient civilisations.🤧🤧🤧......
@Yogi Damn Right !
@जय अमर परशुराम In 1881, Punjab was already under the British since three 3 decades.
Secondly, Jallainwala Bagh event was conducted by two regiments : Baloch regiment and Gurkha regiment.
And yes, Pashtuns ARE Afghans. Pashtuns attacked India multiple times.
You have basic facts wrong.
And let me also tell you, Sikhs were widely over represented in the number of revolutionaries in the freedom struggle, and also over represented in the INA. And if the Sikhs were not there in the 18th and early 19th century, much of northern India would have been now Pakistan because as I said, the Afghans were the most brutal people to come in centuries.
I didn't want to bring this here, but you have a dislike for Sikhs and suffer from a superiority complex, so just for you I mentioned that. And now, please grant me leave. Since you don't have anything to add to my original comment at the top. You speak irrelevant things and that too without knowing the truth. Take care.
@Yogi Chatrapati Shivajis father served in the Sultanate army and Mughal army fighting wars for them. So the Marathas were much bigger traitors right? The Marathas formed alliances with the French, so they were traitors right?
Open your eyes. You guys form your opinions first and then read the facts.
Many of the Hindu Kings collaborated with the Turks and fought in their armies against other Hindu as well as Muslim kings. If the Sikhs were traitors, then the Hindus were 100 times bigger traitors. Because Sikh regiment was formed after all of India was captured. The Hindus and Muslims in the British army actually conquered India for them. Also please read my comment just before this one.
And tgey did not liberate the Christian and Muslim lands completely. They fought them and even cooperated with them many times. And please stop living in this La La Land of wishful thinking.
Also, again, if you have anything to add to the original comment at the top, please answer. I am not here to satisfy your superiority complex and dislike for some people. Irrelevant to the topic, you bring out your hatred for the Sikhs just because of my name. Whatever you want to believe, fine by me. Take care :)
I agree with your view point harpreet!! .. If Afghan would have won then.. It would be worst and india would have faced many repercussions for that even in present times.. Obviously they would expand after that.and what they could have done other religious people is we can't even think about it. And in modern times,who knows it would had been expanding version of Pakistan, in 1947 Pakistan could have claimed those regions also if pashtun won or Afghanistan wd have claimed.!!! And brother please here don't argue with people who said that sikhs/maratha/rajputs are this and that...
Jai hind
Literally what I thought after seeing the movie.
And it thought after when i learned about that whole battle
@@nischesharma 🧠🧠Afghans converted to Islam thousands years ago they choose whatever they want to be and that doesn’t change their DNA, it’s there region indigenously and ethnically and they were Victorious against British led Battles and invasion including allying forces Hindus Sikh with them.
Afghans defeated all of them and never chooses to be slave of British for many years despite lazy Hindus were enjoying slavery.
You cannot justify modern wars on the basis of ancient times and ancient civilisations when humans were primitive look at the world now no ancient civilisations despite you early humans.🧠🧠
Behari, Bengali, Ponjabi, Madrasi, Tamilial all have their own regions and culture and skin stay happy with that thanks nobody can claim regions on the basis of ancient mythology religions and ancient civilisations.
@@trevorjack8542 a lot of corrections,
Afghans didn't accept,they were forced to. There is a serious difference,then they persecuted Hindus and Sikhs in Afghanistan,who were afghans as well.
While muslims were not persecuted under sikh raj. Also, afghans defeated no one, after the British secured a geographically secure land which would stand the Russians,they went no further,as spoils of wars should be more fruitfull than the expenditure of wars, AFGHANISTAN IS A BARREN PLACE WERE PEOPLE RUN TO MOUNTAIN TOPS(CONSIDERING THE POPULATION A GOOD STRATEGY,NOT MENT TO DEMEAN), NOTE: RUSSIA WAS A BIG THREAT NOT AFGHANS.
I do agree that Hindus had a slave mentality under British but it was due to the famine polices and economic destruction, a empty stomach will beg not fight. Also, in a different perspective, it was better that British came,as Hindus were no longer under Islamic rule and daughters and women were comparetively free,than before.
Also,don't forget rani Lakshmi Bai,nepali Hindus, Hindus under sikh regiments,Marathas,ahom Hindus,Azad Singh,Bhagat Singh,Subhash chandra Bose and Indian liberation army. You can be selective in your view but try to atleast see a glimpse of history from other side.
Also, when it comes to CLAIMING TERRITORY OVER ANCIENT HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL MAP CCP WANTS TO KNOW YOUR LOCATION.:)
@@kumaryogesh5829 First Afghans stopped British led invasions from already occupied British India.
From where slaves Hindus and Sikhs regiments were attacking Afghans instead of revolting against there true Masters British.
Afghans push them back and many British slave regiment were gone to dust while they tried to Invade the Afghans country.
Secondly even after when British Era of colonialism ended in cold war era after WW2 Afghan were again invaded by Soviet Union rest you know the history what happened to them Victorious Afghans.
Afghanistan is a barren land but had enrich minerals to sustain themselves for next thousand years small population unless like you unstable population over 1.4 billion people and deceases kill people in India more than people dying in war torn countries all around the world.
WE DONT HAVE TO MANUPLATE OUR HISTORY TO PROVE OUR STRUGGLE WE ARE WHAT WE ARE SINCE THEN and world knows that nobody especially slaves cannot judge them what they did.
@@trevorjack8542 I explained the so called slave mentality, and why it existed, also if they run away up the mountains how can you beat them,do you mean afghans are special warriors and would defeat any ethnicity in fight on a equal playing feild. Also, Americans supplied arms to afghans to fight Soviet and profited . And Russia did same when USA invaded.
Afghanistan natural resources got drained USA as well.
You didn't read about anything I wrote,
So in simple words do you think that afghans are the most powerful warrior race and will defeat any on same playing feild?
As Guru Gobind Singh said Chiriya se main baaz ladau, gidara nu mein Sher banau, Sawa lakh se ek ladau te Gobind Singh nam kahau, they did not kneel before those turks......
Afghans they were
🧠🧠Afghans converted to Islam thousands years ago they choose whatever they want to be and that doesn’t change their DNA, it’s there region indigenously and ethnically and they were Victorious against British led Battles and invasion including allying forces Hindus Sikh with them British.
Afghans defeated all of them and never chooses to be slave of British for many years despite lazy Hindus were enjoying slavery.
You cannot justify modern wars on the basis of ancient times and ancient civilisations when humans were primitive look at the world now no ancient civilisations despite you early humans.🧠🧠
Behari, Bengali, Ponjabi, Madrasi, Tamilial all have their own regions and culture and skin stay happy with that thanks nobody can claim regions on the basis of ancient mythology religions and ancient civilisations.
@@trevorjack8542 wtf are you bitching at
@@trevorjack8542 no things that you said makes any sense.
@@shreyasathreya6361 You see modern world from the eyes of ten thousands years old primitive ancient civilisations. You have lower wisdom to understand such things
Sir how do you think the gurukul system or the similar ancient educational systems can make their way into the current education system... i feel today the education system does not do anything specific to develop the character of the children. So many childern are into self destructing practices.
@@SaiAbitathaDUCIC I'm from one such branch of that school, and I agree that they uniquely organise separate bhajan sessions, orchestras and encourage young children to participate in various activities they organise.
Use #AskAbhijit before question...
#AskAbhijit sir could you please tell about Chhatrapati Shivaji maharaj's Major impact against Turkic (Mughals)? And also about his being father of medieval indian Navy?
Biggest impact was that the Great King gave courage to Indians to fight turks and unite for Motherland.
You can tell Shivaji Maharaj as father of Medieval Indian navy. Cholas had the best navy in the world at their time.
@@ashrithrao06 Agree
@@ashrithrao06 agreed
@@ashrithrao06 thanks for correction
I am so lucky that I found abhijeet sir Chanel and Jaipur dialogue channel
The Sikhs lost against the British because they were betrayed by the Hindu generals who were Dogras, ( Muslims remained loyal to the Sikhs) . Sikhs have suffered greatly at the hands of Pashtuns , who often plundered Punjab, it’s not by chance if those Sikhs were ready to die for the British. I visited those areas in 1976 when I traveled to India overland and 1977 on the way back to Europe. It was possible to travel by bus from Peshawar to Kabul , trough the Khyber pass. I can say one thing, those areas were de facto independent. Pashtuns were all carrying arms, and didn’t think of themselves as Pakistanis . I remember that every bus passenger had to pay a tax to the local tribes, before entering the Khyber pass. On the way from Kabul to Peshawar, people were selling drugs , and changing money openly. When I asked about the border security, they replied. They are here to stamp your passport, nothing else. We are in charge here .
I keep listening to plenty of nonsense from many historians. Far from condoning colonisation, it’s clear that if the British were able to colonisé India , it was because it was not a country. It was a feudal system, and it was like Europe , made of several different people. In the distant past it may have been ruled by brahmanism , like Europe was ruled by the Catholic Church. Ashoka probably, but the British united the country.
can we just appreciate the bravery of those 21 soldiers who fought against and force of 10,000 men irrespective of who were they and what they fought for?
👍👍👍🙏🙏
No.
@@thedescanteer some people lack senses
@@rajsaini3138 Sensible people don't say things like "let's applaud bravery irrespective of what it fights or stands for", notwithstanding what the particulars are in this specific case. Such inane platitudes are made by and for unthinking, uninformed, virtue-signalling plebs who are preoccupied with political correctness over objectivity.
@@thedescanteer In mahabharat when arjuna was fighting against karna, krishna was in full praise of karna skill and bravery inspite of the intense battle. Even after kargil war dead pakistani soldiers were given a proper burial. These shows that warriors irrespective of the side they fought for must be respected for their bravery. We must blame the British and not 21 brave soldiers who showed extraordinary courage and battle skill.
#AskAbhijit What is your point of view on ‘Tajmahal Hindu Bhavan hai ’ by P. N. Oak
@Abhay Shah comment ko like kardo Bhai
@@Ritvik-xs3yh Would you please tell me why you think so?
@@Ritvik-xs3yh how can anyone proclaim Christianity as Krishna Niti?
@@Ritvik-xs3yh
Yes but Christianity is actually Solar Religion.
The Christian so called God is Solar Diety i.e Suryadev.
Ancient mythology and superstition dharama
They did not fight for the britishers actually, they fought for the land conquered by jarnail hari sngh nalwa from pathans. Saraghardi jo land tha na woh basically hari singh nalwa ka hi jeeta hua land tha. And sikhs are sensitive for their generals and shaheed. Thats why they fought against the pathans even though pathans gave them a chance to not fight
bhai stand up comedy bhi krte ho ?
😂😂 chewtiya
@@SHIVAM-qe8uo lol🤣🤣🤣 tu history nhu padhi ghonchu.
@@anmolmanhas6539 ismei galat kya bola?
@@anmolmanhas6539 dude maan liya woh britishers ke liye ladh rahe the pr unhone pathans ko rok kr bharat ko toh bachaya na
#AskAbhijit What is the truth of Tipu Sultan?
Put #askabhijit in your question
*Butcher* , he killed many indians in south
Kozhikode was renamed briefly as Islamabad, when Tipu invaded.
Tippu is tyrant. He killed thousands of civilians just because they didn't converted to Islam. A place in Karnataka is Melukote. People there even today do not celebrate Diwali festival because Tippu has killed many of their ancestors during Diwali night.
Hyena of mysore
Pashtuns were freedom fighters and These sikhs were supporting Britishers. This is a fact and you can't change the history.
You can never change the FACT that Singh is King. Less than 3% of the population and more than 97% greatness. Now the Sikhs have a greater community outside of India and history revivalists for political and other reasons can not ever undermine them. Sikhs command respect everywhere and it is deserved. In the West they could easily be victimised like Muslims are for the way they dress etc but they just come out always handsome magnificent and great. No fly be night hate mongers can now reach them. The more they are picked on the higher they get profiled.. Who in the world even recognises or knows a Maratha Paratha. Rajput's are also great characters and are visually represented by mostly Muslim Rajput's. In a recent world survey Ghandhi Hi was voted the greatest human ever??
@@jeetbahal7878 get a life
*Randeep Hooda's* project would 'd been amazing wish it was done
Great video👍👍
Sikhs had a bitter history with Mughals right from the start of their first guru - Guru Nanak. So, they would not defend afghans. Secondly, as Abhijit mentioned, after second Anglo-Sikh war, where sikhs lost and east India copmany annexed Sikh Empire and the entire Punjab region up to Peshawar. By this time, maharaja Ranjit Singh was also dead. So, sikh soldiers were "leaderless" and they were controlled by British Empire.
#AskAbhijit Sir what r your thoughts on Veer Savarkar?
There are many few things written about him in our history textbooks. Many people in India don't even know his history but still they always backlash him for no reason. Will you please elaborate about this. Thx Sir.
bhai 70 saal ki brainwashing hai ki india mein do cheez hai taj mahal and gandhi.
kuch secular log india mein kuch nhi sab mughals and britishers ne diya hai, par koi inse ye puche ki wo bharat mein kya tatti sab karne aye the humari😒😒😒😒😒😒
@@worldnews1055 💯
#AskAbhijit Sir if "Time Travel" would have been possible than what is that one thing which you want to change in past or what will you do in future ??
@Rajesh Pal Suppose if it would be possible than what will you do....?? 😼
I would go to 13 November 1191 during the 1st battle of Tarain and would advise Prithviraj Chauhan to at least imprison Muhammad Ghori, if he wouldn't kill him. I would take a fully charged laptop there to show him and convince him I'm from the future and tell him what will happen if he pardons him.
@Rajesh Pal Makes sense, travelling future seems imaginable for once, but with past such question arises.
I would stop prithviraj chauhan from forgiving ghori
If this has to possible then things have to preplanned.
Cause we think time is straight line.
The best theory about time travel is when we at very high speed and we come back to earth we will see time is different.
So is it time travel = relative times.
Time is not absolute. 🤯
Existence of Bhikaristan is a disgrace for all the bravehearts of our soil who fought and sacrificed everything for undivided Bharat. Jinnah kmkb. Jai hind. Akhand Bharat ban k rahega!
@@Roachh2877 most of India's problems have bhikaristan hands. Kashmir? Bhikaristan. Khalistan? Bhikaristan hands. Kerala Islamists extremist? Bhikaristan hands. Hindu genocide in west and east bengal? Bhikaristan hands. 26/11? Bhikaristan hands. Akshardham temple attack? Bhikaristan hands.
Tell me one good thing that bhikaristan has done for us?
What do we gain by letting pakistan be? We lose lives, stability, reputation.
What I think is british were hyping that battle to next level. They were praising Sikh valour against Pashtuns (the bad guys) in their editorials.
Today those cunning British are no more.We should avoid such 100 year old propaganda.
Well Sikh and Pashtun rivalry goes back one century before battle of saraghari. We screwed them over enough with our one empire.
Then you got spat on by pashtoons. British slaves will always get a taste of their own medicine
Indians always killed Indians by betraying us and joining enemy. Our forts even today are impenetrable, but kille k darwaze andar se khole gaye hai hamesha. That's what British took advantage of.
Panjab was its own country, huge in size compared to present day. British invade Panjab in 1849(or 1850) then war of Saragrahi.. Those solider at the time fought of Sikh empire not India (India was not there home) as stories and Presence of maharaja ranjit singh was still fresh.
Lol , the concept of country is western concept which limits people of the earth to not travel freely around the planet . These guys ( Europeans ) went all throughout the planet and colonise everything while they restricted others to do so by introducing Visa and Passport . This concept came in rest of the world after colonisation, there was no countries before it but there was a “civilisation” where all human beings were welcomed unlike now where humans have drawn artificial borders in planet which just causes wars and destruction.
There's a famous saying in Punjabi “Khaadha peeta lahe da baaki Ahmad Shahe da” (what belongs to you is whatever you have eaten and drunk, rest belongs to Ahmad Shah). Ahmad Shah was one of the most infamous Afghani invaders. This saying developed because of the constant invasions by Afghanis in winters every year. They plundered, looted, raped women and went back. Sikh Empire put a stop to it and for 50 years there were no invasions from Afghanis.
I just mean to say Afghanis or pashtuns were never Indians. Due to the atrocities afghanis had done in the past, Sikhs never had any affinity for them. I don't agree with this video.
This guy seems to have a lot of knowledge and is definitely well read. I have limited knowledge but still I am very neutral and objective in whatever I read. I have seen some of his videos and I do get a feel when it comes to videos related to Indian history he has a certain bias towards a particular segment of society. There's always some grey and nothing is white or black. If I have to trust someone at face value, I need to be sure he is neutral and giving me objective information. For instance - in one of his videos he says Ashoka had already converted to buddhism from Hinduism before he annihilated Kalinga. Reason given - he was already reading about Buddhism before that invasion. It just sounds stupid and just corroborated by belief that he has an agenda and does not provide objective information.
I have read about Mughal Empire and totally agree that rulers like Jehangir, Aurangzeb were total assholes so I agree with that aspect but Akbar as far as I have read was a fairly good ruler and even started his own religion 'Dīn-i Ilāhī' which encompassed good qualities from all religion. Even Birbal adapted that religion. Been a Muslim it would totally have been blasphemous but he believed in it (This to me is an example of a good king, who cares for his people irrespective of their religion). So this is what I mean by being objective, just a small example. Just saying don't take this guy at face value and do your own research as well.
Lol sikhs stopped them ? Yes but only after 1780s before that afghans killed almost everyone , 2 ghullugara happened in punjab in between 1730-70 .
Ala singh got 750 villages in gift from ahmad shah abdali 🤦🤦 punjab has been a land of backstabers its history is very ugly.
Ranjit singhs phase was only peaceful time in punjab's history but after his death his childrens were killed by their own greedy peoples to gain control over his empire🤦🤦
@@saurabh6453 yes these guys are opportunists.
@@saurabh6453 hindutva people spotted
@8:15 those forts were constructed by Maharaja Ranjit Singh (not by the British)
Secondly, Afghans had terrorized north India for a few centuries and they helped the foreign invaders from the Middle East to loot India .
(So they were not Indians ,so to speak)
Thirdly, Sikh empire fell due to a few conspiracies .nonetheless, Sikhs were promised freedom if they fought for the British empire in the world wars . Sikhs were the first people who revolted against the British . And they were the last to be conquered by the British
(Britishers controlled the armies of the entire nation and still couldn’t defeat the Sikh army so they resorted to other measures )
PS : Gotta read some books before you comment on these topics
Were these pashtuns coming to India just to say that "We are Indians and we love you". No way they wanted to destroy India. I agree that sikhs were in British Army but what they did was that they saved their motherland and no one want your validation over what sikhs did for the country
Say whatever you want when maharaja Ranjit Singh created Sikh empire then hari Singh took over Afghanistan that time from that side they stop attacking India
That's was after 1000 years of Indian gulami
Sikh freed India
You should make videos on it thx
#AskAbhijit What is your take on Nostradamus' prediction about the immortal ruler?
#AskAbhijit
Sir What happened in Battle of Haifa..
Indian cavalry with no guns defeated outnumbered turk/turkish ottomans and germans with guns and terrain in favour, at Haifa in Isareal
@@Ritvik-xs3yh 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🇮🇳🇮🇳
Sir Why don't you write a Book on history of India .It will be very useful and One of the best books in history.
French did the same game with maharajas of vijayanagar and bobbili in Andhra Pradesh. Vijanagar raja was flattered by french and went to war with bobbili that too in a cunning way😢
The Sikhs were smart ...they fought for the British but didn't fight during the 1857 revolt ...hence they became the favorite of the British
Sikh empire was dissolved by 1849. Therefore no one can say they didn't fought. Moreover revolt of 1857 was not a well structured, that's why no one can say they didn't participated knowingly.
@@sachinnayal of course they fought...and pretty well...but they chose the right side ...
@@dishanknayal6118 sikhs didn't fight 1857 coz hindus helped britishers to dethrone sikh empire... Anglo sikh wars who do you think were in british army then???
@@SurinderKaur-dv5pr u made ur point and thats fine ...but don't talk about doing some research or 'read about it'...nobody is going to change the opinion... yes I read some history and came to know about the khalistanis, air india blast, how Hindus were killed in Punjab, farmer protest by the free loading spoil brats of Punjab eating taxpayers money.. but ya ...u have a point ...peace
sikhs didnt help indians fight for the revolt because indians would make mughals their emperor and sikhs knew their history of persecution by mughals, and if they today help mughals become their king would they betray themselves? another thing that almost all the british seopys who revolted were purbias from bihar and bengal, who were main reason of conquering the sikhs by treachory of dogras and smart moves of taking out supplies of sikhs, and bribing sikh general. sikhs too revolted before with king of multan and bhai maharaj singh ji and also you should know about ajnala massacre, sikhs were also involved.
'Nothing has really changed' that's is mystery of tragedy... purpose of human Life, purpose of universe those way'...
Hemu's real name was Hema Chnadran Vikram Aditya and was a Afghan Hindu who kicked out the mughals....
We guys needed to wake up and get out history corrected, our life has been a lie.
When Maharaja Ranjit Singh fought against Afgans to reclaim the lost glory, would you say Indians fought against Indians. Source: Prof Kapil Kapoor .
in the name of Whatever.it's still going on. i like the way you put out the conclusion.👍🏼
#AskAbhijit What is the biggest proof against the Aryan Invasion Theory ?
There is no proof of Aryan invasion theory , why u want counterpart ?
@@shubhampawar3652 Lol I found what I was looking for, this comment was from when I was new to the channel.
But Pashtuns were already hypnotized by a foreign religion.
So fighting against Pashtuns was not like fighting against Indians.
Gori was also in some manner Indian, it didn't mean fighting against him was like fighting against any Indian.
🧠🧠Afghans converted to Islam thousands years ago they choose whatever they want to be and that doesn’t change their DNA, it’s there region indigenously and ethnically and they were Victorious against British led Battles and invasion including allying forces Hindus Sikh with them Britishers.
Afghans defeated all of them and never chooses to be slave of British for many years despite lazy Hindus were enjoying slavery.
You cannot justify modern wars on the basis of ancient times and ancient civilisations when humans were primitive look at the world now no ancient civilisations despite you early humans.🧠🧠
Behari, Bengali, Ponjabi, Madrasi, Tamilial all have their own regions and culture and skin stay happy with that thanks nobody can claim regions on the basis of ancient mythology religions and ancient civilisations.🤧🤧🤧...
@@trevorjack8542 yaa if that islam fairy tale or mythology by Mohammad never would have took place...this world would have been a better place to live.
@@mohit5165Great teaching from Hinduism! Disrespectful. No wonder Indians are the most disliked people on this planet
Hats off to you sir👌👌🙏
Jai hind Sir 🙏
Well one could feel the pain in the man who asked this question as his people were given a beating
#AskAbhijit is there any relation between kashmiri community, parsis and Iranians? and which culture did so called Aryans Followed?
Parsi, Iranis arw somewhat same people but there is no relation of Kashmiri community with them. Except some Persian culture adopted by Kashmiri Muslims under the rule of Islamic rulers.
#AskAbhijit
sir, maybe like 6-7 years ago I heard about Higgs boson - may be also known as "the God particle". They called that it can be the answer that how universe found....but now no one is talking about it....please explain it.
Sir I’m a Pashtun but then why Israel and Jewish people claim that Pashtun tribe is one of their lost 10 Jewish tribes ?
Same Jewish Propaganda brother.
Pashtuns are Iranian in origin i.e Aryan whereas Jews are Semetic.
Arabs, Jews and other Middle Eastern Communities are Semitic.
But Turks, Pashtuns are Aryans.
They even Claim Chitpavan Koknasth Brahmins to be Jews 😂😂🤣
But they again Claim them to be Brahmins and Aryan Invader stuff
And claim their DNA as purest Aryan.
And still say they were Jewish.
What to say bout' them.
@@mogambochamchokaabaap7262 🧠🧠Afghans converted to Islam thousands years ago they choose whatever they want to be and that doesn’t change their DNA, it’s there region indigenously and ethnically and they were Victorious against British led Battles and invasion including allying forces Hindus Sikh with them Britishers.
Afghans defeated all of them and never chooses to be slave of British for many years despite lazy Hindus were enjoying slavery.
You cannot justify modern wars on the basis of ancient times and ancient civilisations when humans were primitive look at the world now no ancient civilisations despite you early humans.🧠🧠
Behari, Bengali, Ponjabi, Madrasi, Tamilial all have their own regions and culture and skin stay happy with that thanks nobody can claim regions on the basis of ancient mythology religions and ancient civilisations.🤧🤧🤧
@@mogambochamchokaabaap7262 U R Right but Turks are not Aryans
@@trevorjack8542 Shut Up
It is said that Afgan commanders of Artillery joined hands with Turks to dethrone Hemchandra. Source: Glimpses of indian history - Prof Mohanlal Gupta.
@abhijit chavdaji, How do you define an Indian? Purely as an geographical entity? Or as an cultural entity? To be specific what culture similarity do you see among Indians belonging to a geographically vast area? As you are well aware culture and language change every 30KM in our great land. My point is lets stop beating around the bush and agree to accept that only a group of people sharing a same worldview and same motivations can constitute a nation, which is true if and only if they share the same religion.
#AskAbhijit Some research says that evidence found related to nuclear weapon used around 7000 year ago, is it related mahabharat or ramayana celestial weapon like brahamastra. If yes then how this knowledge got vanished
It is said that our own seiges and sadhus burnt and hide such texts carrying knowledge about such deadly weaponry cause they were scared of what happened in Mahabharata war .. such deadly weapons could wipe out an entire civilisation if gone into wrong hands...
@@rammodhvadiya7004 may be right bro but if answer from sir then it will be ti good
@@yashkumawat129 ofcourse Abhijit sir would give the best answer this was what I hear about it
@@yashkumawat129 bro when the kaliyug was started there were just one people in this world who knows to handle this deadly weapons and he was Parikshit . But sree krishna told him that don't give this information to anyone in this kaliyug and damaged all the scripts where was written how to use this deadly weapons. So king Parikshit was the last man to know how to invoke this deadly weapons.
@@devingoggins7159 lol. But we have even more nuclear weapons today in kaliyog
In Punjabi, I can say Ghoosi bhorti... Useless arguments.
Fact is that, when British acquired Punjab, KPK was part of Punjab, so they got KPK too. Punjab had always invasions from Iran and Afghanistan. To stop these invasions, Punjab/Sikhs conquered KPK (which was part of Afghanistan by that time) and made it part of Punjab.
Even though British were ruling India, Sikhs still believed Punjab to be their motherland and at every cost, they were ready to fight any other invasion into Punjab and strenghting of these attacks from West could be a threat for Punjab. So, Sikhs had no option, but to fight.
They fought to keep the afghans out of Indian land even though it was under British, right decision!
👍👍🙏🙏🇮🇳
सर क्या आप हमारे लिये हिंदी भाषा मे व्हिडिओज बना सकते हैं? हम आपको सुनते हैं लेकीन अंग्रेजी हमे ज्यादा आती नही इसलीये कूछ उपरसे निकल जाता हैं...
खूप खूप आभारी आहे अभिजित सर आम्हाला खरोखर चा इतिहास अवगत करून दिल्या बद्दल.
So the British used Indians to win India. 😢
✌️✌️🚩🚩
#askAbhijit sir tell us about lalitaditya mukhtapida ! Its said he was Indias greatest ruler ever .
Lalitaditya muktapida is a great king of Kashmir who successfully stopped Arab invasion in 7th century ( in 6oo's) and conquered up to some part of Arabia.
Due to his fear Arabs didn't conquer India in next 300 years. Lalitaditya constructed Martanda sun temple in kashmir.
@@nagalalitha1551 I know about that , needed more details. I searched the web and found very little stuff about him and bappa rawal
This man has a lot of knowledge
those 21 were fighting for the land once owned by Maharaja Ranjit Singh.
#AskAbhijit can you please explain about the fall of autocracy and rise of socialism and marxism in Russia?
There was clear distinction between Afgans and Indians at that period right?
#AskAbhijit Bloody history of Kashmiri Hindus
History Lesson for the world :
1. Sikhs never back down .
2. Sikhs would have never fought afghans had they not attacked Shri Harmandir Sahib .
3. Calling pakhtoon tribes indian is like calling Russians as Indians , so disagree with you on that point
So Turks are foreigners, muglas born in india are indians..so mughlas fought against Turks
The Pashtun tribals were mostly Afridi Pashtuns
While the 21 Sikh soldiers were Jat Sikhs
No it was Orakzai pashtoon area ...
#askabhijit can you please explain the treaty of Amritsar and its geographical importance , i had read that ranjit singh had forced the brits to stay on the left side of satluj river , as so my history teacher told me , but i never understood it . pls help
#AskAbhijit Sir brahmastra is said to have connection with modern day nukes, and pushpak viman is found to be aerodynamically accurate, so why didn't we use this technology to fight mughals and turks?
Sir plz make video on Netaji’s death mystery
Sir hindi channel par dali ek vedio pls 🙏
#askabhijit please explain on reality super weapons in Mahabharata like Brahmastra Vaishnavastra Pashupatastra e t.c and their relation with current super weapons like Nuclear bomb e.t.c
Plz cover yadav warrior history with rejangla and cho-la war in discussion please
#AskAbhijit
Sir Will Indian Army Collapse.
Will Avarage Population of India Became Old before becoming Rich.
lol, there is something called unmanned weapons and lol, will all people die out if seen by your logic
Sir, gandhar is not Afghanistan or for the sake kandahar. Gandhar is taxila-islamabad area in current Pakistan
NO
Yes ancient gandahar is in modern day Pakistan not Afghanistan taxila is in Pakistan not Afghanistan
Most of gandahara remains are found in Pakistan like taxila swat valley even Peshawar
@@sssppp6962 NO U R WRONG
@@gurugantaal5782 then explain
Sir says turkik invasions in literally every video😂😂, btw love ur work sir
Turks were really great warriors
@@sssppp6962 but they were very cruel
Because it were actually the Turk invasions which succeeded in India. From Ghori, Ghajni, to Mughals, they were Turks not Arabs or Pashtoons. Turks were excellent warriors with the knowledge of Gun Powder/Cannons and excellent breed of Horses.
@@SHIVAM-qe8uo even Khilji was half turk half afghan
Sir I love to watch your videos
#askabhijit. Hello sir please suggest some books on medivial/modern indian history
🕉️🙏
#askabhijit sir can you tell me about the history of yadavas are they ksyriyas
Sir you are incorrect . Calling pakhtun as Indians is like calling Chinese as Nepali’s . Pakhtuns have always invaded India and killed and stolen from India, many times these pakhtuns attached they took off with Hindu women who were later sold in the markets of ghazni as commodity . These pakhtoons later attached the golden temple because the Sikhs fought them while they were retreating and rescued the women . And hari singh nalwa spent his entire life fighting these tribals and till date their children are afraid of the word haria . Only the Sikhs could push back these afghans and could overpower them in their own territory.
#askabhijeet how Germany become so developed especially in militarily like we can see rate of fire of 70,80 years old machine gun MG42 and many more things.Is this any thing Because of they followed Vedic scriptures which they believe was developed by them and all that things....hope you get my question.
Same my point of view while watching movie🍿🎥
Rahul Baba is half European. On a serious not consider him East India Company 0.2 which he is amply portraying.
🛑#AskAbhijit I have expirienced that we cannot think without words. Am I right ?
I think pasthuns and Punjabis were arch enemies
#AskAbhijit despite being the first and most powerful mahajanpda Magadha (Bihar), it lost its glory with time. How do u see the condition of Bihar and bihari people today.,😸
Lalu Prasad Yadav and his two gems wasn't there at the time of glorious Magadh (Bihar). Most of the ancient glorious kingdoms were in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, and now at these two States. All because of Caste politics. Yadav Votebank voting for Samajvadi, Dalit Votebank voting to Mayawati etc.
Don’t be funny against Jatt Sikhs 21 or 22 Sikhs seems to know everything else perfectly well
#askabhijit
If the yadav clan got extint at the end of mahabharta then where did present days Yadavs come from.
Sikhs didn’t sent their daughter to mughals… because mughals were butcher while british gave rights to sikhs to follow their religion… afghans feared sikhs thats a truth ❤
Which religion?? A Abrahamic cult in which Today's Sikhism has developed.
What happened to Ranjit Singhs son, was he not converted to Christianity. Go and read history, how the British started Christianity in Punjab after anglo-sikh wars and developed Sikhs into a Abrahamic cult that today people are cuting heads and legs and hands of each other in Punjab.
Durrani empire had lead a mass murder of Sikhs- Vadda Ghalughara, a Sikh Genocide. There would be no way any Sikh would retreat when facing Afghans in a battle
There was no India or Pakistan before 1947
Good analysis but there is nothing terribly tragic about Indians fighting Indians in this instance. We have done it for thousands of years. The fact that it was under the British isn't particularly more unfortunate. I don't think the Pashtun tribesmen northwest of the Durand Line considered themselves Indians even then. They probably have not for a thousand years or so. The Pashtuns southeast of the Durand Line consider themselves Indians, Pakistanis now. These are the people Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan fought for, not Afghanis. There is a political division between Pakistani (Indian) Pashtuns and Afghan Pashtuns but you cannot really know of it until you have lived in northwest Pakistan.
It is true, Maharana Pratap formed an alliance with that time afghan king and others, against the mughals.
Maharana pratap formed alliance with Hakim khan suri who was the descendent of Sher Shah Suri who was from today's Bihar.
And at that time Hakim khan was not any king. He was just leading some 500 pathans.
@@aegontargaryen3818 yes, but as much as i remember i heard somewhere that he also formed alliance with some foreign king, more probably someone from afghan. Think i need to research more.
@@rage8673 No he never made any alliance with any foreign power. He made alliance with only Hakim khan suri who descendant of Sher Shah Suri. When Maharana Pratap ascended the throne in 1572 Ad he was himself surrounded by Foreign Turkic Mughals. But Mughals not able to Conquer maharana pratap and his Mewar. He was the only one who was able to defy Akbar and put up a fierce resistance alone and unaided against mighty Mughals
Abdali win panipat war against Maratha then why he go back from panipat ? Why not invade whole india? #askabhijit
Because Maratha Empire was not collapsed in panipat. They stil have very Large army. Infact Balaji Baji Rao ( Nana Saheb ) himself marched towards Delhi with around 1lakh+ army.
@@jalal3254 I know but mai sirf iss comment ka reply de raha tha ki abdali kyon lauta.
But Balaji Bajirao ke bare mein hume ye bhi nahi bhulna chahiye ki unke time par hi Maratha Empire apne peak par tha
#AskAbhijit If Russia had colonized India instead of Great Britain would India be worse or better?
Colonialism is always bad
It would be worse
Mangal pandey also had to face Indian gaddar soldiers who were under British payroll
Sir were akbar & Tipu Sultan really great?did Mughals & Sultans did any good for India?#askabhijit
We Mughals did Meena Bazaar
Chittorgarh Killings
Bengal Killings
Conversion of Mandirs to Masjids
Killed the Greatest Person - Chatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj
Killed Sons of Guru Gobind Singh and other Sikhs.
Lost against Rana Pratap
Lost against Great Marathas 😊
Tipsy Sultan wasn't different.
He too killed Malabar Hindus and
Destroyed many temples.
Again Defeated by Great Marathas 😊
I love my Father Marathas.
The Great Mughal Fathers.
@@mogambochamchokaabaap7262 and who are we.
We are the ones who have insects of secularism in our ass.
@@mogambochamchokaabaap7262 lol 😂😊
@@lifeisnothingbuttorturepai4610 he said chattrapati sambhaji maharaj 👍🙏❤
@@lifeisnothingbuttorturepai4610 He wrote Sambhaji not Shivaji